Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING NEWS: Top U.S. Nuclear Chief Caught LEAKING Sensitive National Security Information to Stranger, Reveals Army Chemist Was Exposed to U.S. Chemical Nerve Agent, Confirms U.S. Strike Killed Children in Iran, Discloses U.S. Plans to ‘Kill Iran’s New Supreme Leader’ “If he [Mojtaba Khamenei] doesn't change his ways, yeah,...

JamesOKeefeIII's profile picture

James O'Keefe

3,575,355 subscribers

8,038,801 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: Andrew Hugg, a U.S. Chief of Chemical Nuclear Surety, has reportedly been escorted out of the Pentagon and placed on administrative leave. Why: O'Keefe caught him on hidden camera casually discussing U.S. chemical nerve agents, an Army chemist's death, and airstrikes on Iran. The man responsible for nuclear and chemical weapons security was apparently talking about all of it on camera. Source: @OKeefeMediaGroup, Douglas Macgregor
0:40

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: Andrew Hugg, a U.S. Chief of Chemical Nuclear Surety, has reportedly been escorted out of the Pentagon and placed on administrative leave. Why: O'Keefe caught him on hidden camera casually discussing U.S. chemical nerve agents, an Army chemist's death, and airstrikes on Iran. The man responsible for nuclear and chemical weapons security was apparently talking about all of it on camera. Source: @OKeefeMediaGroup, Douglas Macgregor

Mario Nawfal

1,317,962 views • 4 months ago

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?
1:20

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?

Acyn

986,734 views • 1 year ago

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: U.S. Vice President on Iran Having Nukes They just do not want Muslim Countries to have nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia buys billions in Weapons from America, and the U.S. still does not trust them. Vance: "And it's not just them, because if the Iranians get a nuclear weapon, you know who gets a nuclear weapon like the next day? The Saudi Arabians. And then somebody else in the Gulf Arab state. And so you have nuclear proliferation on a global scale. The biggest threat to security in the world is a lot of people having nuclear weapons. So what the president has said is Iran's not going to get a nuclear weapon."
0:33

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: U.S. Vice President on Iran Having Nukes They just do not want Muslim Countries to have nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia buys billions in Weapons from America, and the U.S. still does not trust them. Vance: "And it's not just them, because if the Iranians get a nuclear weapon, you know who gets a nuclear weapon like the next day? The Saudi Arabians. And then somebody else in the Gulf Arab state. And so you have nuclear proliferation on a global scale. The biggest threat to security in the world is a lot of people having nuclear weapons. So what the president has said is Iran's not going to get a nuclear weapon."

Ryan Rozbiani

73,195 views • 6 months ago

Iran has proposed a deal to the U.S. to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war, while deferring nuclear talks to a later stage. President Trump has summoned a Situation Room meeting today to decide Washington’s response. Why accepting this deal by the U.S. would be a defeat for the United States and a big victory for Iran, let’s understand in simple language: The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war, and it will be open after the war once peace is restored. Then what was the objective of this war? This will remain a big question. The initial objectives of the U.S. and Israel were regime change, seizing enriched uranium, and destroying Iran’s nuclear and long-range missile programs. Have they achieved any of these? No. Rather, after this deal, the Islamic regime will intensify its nuclear weapons and long-range missile programs without hesitation because they now know the weakness of the United States. Postponing discussions on the nuclear program indirectly means that Iran is not going to stop. What are the future repercussions of this deal? Many independent journalists have reported that the current IRGC chief, Ahmad Wahidi, has ordered an intensification of the nuclear weapons development program. After a few months or years, Iran may have a nuclear bomb. Once Iran acquires nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, neither the United States nor any other country will be able to save Israel. The Islamic regime has the intent but not the capability to target the U.S. mainland; the day they gain that capability, they will target the U.S. mainland. In short, we can say that this is a trap for the U.S.
1:02

Iran has proposed a deal to the U.S. to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war, while deferring nuclear talks to a later stage. President Trump has summoned a Situation Room meeting today to decide Washington’s response. Why accepting this deal by the U.S. would be a defeat for the United States and a big victory for Iran, let’s understand in simple language: The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war, and it will be open after the war once peace is restored. Then what was the objective of this war? This will remain a big question. The initial objectives of the U.S. and Israel were regime change, seizing enriched uranium, and destroying Iran’s nuclear and long-range missile programs. Have they achieved any of these? No. Rather, after this deal, the Islamic regime will intensify its nuclear weapons and long-range missile programs without hesitation because they now know the weakness of the United States. Postponing discussions on the nuclear program indirectly means that Iran is not going to stop. What are the future repercussions of this deal? Many independent journalists have reported that the current IRGC chief, Ahmad Wahidi, has ordered an intensification of the nuclear weapons development program. After a few months or years, Iran may have a nuclear bomb. Once Iran acquires nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, neither the United States nor any other country will be able to save Israel. The Islamic regime has the intent but not the capability to target the U.S. mainland; the day they gain that capability, they will target the U.S. mainland. In short, we can say that this is a trap for the U.S.

Baba Banaras™

36,866 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING: 🇨🇳 China just took the most aggressive diplomatic position in decades. Xi Jinping on CCTV 13: "If the world is to be saved from a third world war, Israel and the United States must be disarmed of nuclear weapons." China arms Iran. Dumps U.S. Treasuries. Buys discounted Iranian oil. Now demands U.S. nuclear disarmament. This is a direct challenge to U.S. global dominance.
0:21

BREAKING: 🇨🇳 China just took the most aggressive diplomatic position in decades. Xi Jinping on CCTV 13: "If the world is to be saved from a third world war, Israel and the United States must be disarmed of nuclear weapons." China arms Iran. Dumps U.S. Treasuries. Buys discounted Iranian oil. Now demands U.S. nuclear disarmament. This is a direct challenge to U.S. global dominance.

Merlijn The Trader

1,286,386 views • 4 months ago

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
2:09

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

22,300 views • 5 months ago

Q: "In March, the ODNI released their threat assessment concluding Iran is not building a nuclear weapon...What new intelligence does the U.S. have since then?" Hegseth: "The president has made it very clear, he's looked at all of this, all of the intelligence, all of the information, and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat and was willing to take this precision. operation to neutralize that threat in order to advance American national interests."
1:13

Q: "In March, the ODNI released their threat assessment concluding Iran is not building a nuclear weapon...What new intelligence does the U.S. have since then?" Hegseth: "The president has made it very clear, he's looked at all of this, all of the intelligence, all of the information, and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat and was willing to take this precision. operation to neutralize that threat in order to advance American national interests."

The Bulwark

40,809 views • 1 year ago

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸IRAN TO U.S: BOMB US, AND WE GO NUCLEAR Adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Larijani: “We have said that there is a Fatwa, we are working under the supervision of the IAEA and we won’t move towards a nuclear weapon, but if you make a mistake regarding Iran’s nuclear issue, you’ll force Iran to take that path, because it has to defend itself. If you at some point take the path of bombing (Iran’s nuclear sites) yourself or through Israel, you’ll force Iran to make a different decision. This is not your betterment.” Source: AP News
0:26

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸IRAN TO U.S: BOMB US, AND WE GO NUCLEAR Adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Larijani: “We have said that there is a Fatwa, we are working under the supervision of the IAEA and we won’t move towards a nuclear weapon, but if you make a mistake regarding Iran’s nuclear issue, you’ll force Iran to take that path, because it has to defend itself. If you at some point take the path of bombing (Iran’s nuclear sites) yourself or through Israel, you’ll force Iran to make a different decision. This is not your betterment.” Source: AP News

Mario Nawfal

493,034 views • 1 year ago

President Trump warned "all hell will rain down" on Iran if the country decides to pursue nuclear weapons as both countries agreed to an initial deal to end the war. "The only thing that really matters to me is Iran will never have a nuclear weapon," Trump said on Tuesday at the G7 summit in France. The deal is expected to extend the U.S.-Iran ceasefire, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, end a U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports and launch negotiations on Iran's nuclear program.
1:16

President Trump warned "all hell will rain down" on Iran if the country decides to pursue nuclear weapons as both countries agreed to an initial deal to end the war. "The only thing that really matters to me is Iran will never have a nuclear weapon," Trump said on Tuesday at the G7 summit in France. The deal is expected to extend the U.S.-Iran ceasefire, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, end a U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports and launch negotiations on Iran's nuclear program.

CBS News

41,468 views • 2 months ago

“I believed it was inevitable…” “Not because the U.S. ever wants war, but because… these are terrorists who have been threatening the United States since 1979... It was going to take someone to go in and rip these nuclear weapons out of their cold hands.” @MikePompeo on Iran
1:05

“I believed it was inevitable…” “Not because the U.S. ever wants war, but because… these are terrorists who have been threatening the United States since 1979... It was going to take someone to go in and rip these nuclear weapons out of their cold hands.” @MikePompeo on Iran

Tony Perkins

50,387 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: Reports Claim U.S. Strike on Suspected Underground Nuclear Site in Iran Unconfirmed reports circulating overnight claim the U.S. Air Force struck a suspected underground uranium enrichment facility in Bukan, Iran. According to the reports, the facility was allegedly concealed beneath a dairy company used as a cover operation. The claims further suggest that several Iranian nuclear scientists were killed in the strike and that the site was completely destroyed. At this stage, major international news agencies have not yet confirmed the existence of the facility or the strike, and details remain unclear. If verified, it would represent a significant development in the ongoing campaign targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. More information is expected as intelligence assessments and satellite imagery begin to emerge.
0:41

🚨 BREAKING: Reports Claim U.S. Strike on Suspected Underground Nuclear Site in Iran Unconfirmed reports circulating overnight claim the U.S. Air Force struck a suspected underground uranium enrichment facility in Bukan, Iran. According to the reports, the facility was allegedly concealed beneath a dairy company used as a cover operation. The claims further suggest that several Iranian nuclear scientists were killed in the strike and that the site was completely destroyed. At this stage, major international news agencies have not yet confirmed the existence of the facility or the strike, and details remain unclear. If verified, it would represent a significant development in the ongoing campaign targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. More information is expected as intelligence assessments and satellite imagery begin to emerge.

Jim Ferguson

1,106,157 views • 5 months ago

🚨 NEW: Trump says the U.S. struck Iran because, if he “didn’t hit them first,” Tehran would have “taken over the Middle East” and attacked Israel. Speaking to reporters today, President Trump said Iran was planning to “take over the Middle East” with its “thousands of missiles” and “try and destroy Israel” — two of the three justifications he cited for launching the U.S.-Israeli regime change war against Iran on February 28. Trump also claimed Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons, saying Iranian negotiators had effectively told Washington: “We want to continue to build nuclear weapons.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X in the days before the first U.S. strike that Iran will “under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon,” a position also confirmed by Oman’s foreign minister, who was mediating the talks. Since coming to power in the 1979 revolution, Iran’s regime has not initiated a war against another state, but it has supported armed groups resisting Israel’s occupation and expansion.
0:52

🚨 NEW: Trump says the U.S. struck Iran because, if he “didn’t hit them first,” Tehran would have “taken over the Middle East” and attacked Israel. Speaking to reporters today, President Trump said Iran was planning to “take over the Middle East” with its “thousands of missiles” and “try and destroy Israel” — two of the three justifications he cited for launching the U.S.-Israeli regime change war against Iran on February 28. Trump also claimed Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons, saying Iranian negotiators had effectively told Washington: “We want to continue to build nuclear weapons.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X in the days before the first U.S. strike that Iran will “under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon,” a position also confirmed by Oman’s foreign minister, who was mediating the talks. Since coming to power in the 1979 revolution, Iran’s regime has not initiated a war against another state, but it has supported armed groups resisting Israel’s occupation and expansion.

Drop Site

80,364 views • 5 months ago

President Donald Trump issued a new threat against Iran on Wednesday, saying the U.S. would hit "very hard" if the country made a move for nuclear material. In a primetime address from the White House, Trump said the U.S. has obliterated Iran's nuclear sites, and that it "would take months to get near the nuclear dust." "If we see them make a move, even a move for it, we’ll hit them with missiles very hard again," Trump said. The president said the U.S. would hit Iran "extremely hard over the next two to three weeks." At other points of his address, he said the mission was “nearing completion,” and that discussions are ongoing. "We are going to bring them back to the Stone Ages, where they belong," he added. Polls have shown majorities of Americans oppose military action in Iran, and also oppose U.S. troops on the ground there. Gas prices have soared to over $4 a gallon, heightening Americans' economic concerns. Trump described the sticker shock as "temporary." "The United States has never been better prepared economically to confront this threat. You all know that," he said earlier in his remarks.
3:51

President Donald Trump issued a new threat against Iran on Wednesday, saying the U.S. would hit "very hard" if the country made a move for nuclear material. In a primetime address from the White House, Trump said the U.S. has obliterated Iran's nuclear sites, and that it "would take months to get near the nuclear dust." "If we see them make a move, even a move for it, we’ll hit them with missiles very hard again," Trump said. The president said the U.S. would hit Iran "extremely hard over the next two to three weeks." At other points of his address, he said the mission was “nearing completion,” and that discussions are ongoing. "We are going to bring them back to the Stone Ages, where they belong," he added. Polls have shown majorities of Americans oppose military action in Iran, and also oppose U.S. troops on the ground there. Gas prices have soared to over $4 a gallon, heightening Americans' economic concerns. Trump described the sticker shock as "temporary." "The United States has never been better prepared economically to confront this threat. You all know that," he said earlier in his remarks.

PBS News

33,019 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. and Iran still look like they’re negotiating from two completely different realities: sovereignty, sanctions, and economic normalization are all being read in opposite ways. Charles Finfrock’s warning: Iran has already failed to uphold its obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and has repeatedly been caught trying to develop a nuclear weapon in secret. He calls that one of the greatest intelligence successes in American history, arguing the U.S. has tracked every step the regime has taken. If Tehran thinks it can hide future nuclear progress, Charles says it is on a “fool’s errand.” Charles Finfrock
2:58

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. and Iran still look like they’re negotiating from two completely different realities: sovereignty, sanctions, and economic normalization are all being read in opposite ways. Charles Finfrock’s warning: Iran has already failed to uphold its obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and has repeatedly been caught trying to develop a nuclear weapon in secret. He calls that one of the greatest intelligence successes in American history, arguing the U.S. has tracked every step the regime has taken. If Tehran thinks it can hide future nuclear progress, Charles says it is on a “fool’s errand.” Charles Finfrock

Mario Nawfal

42,376 views • 2 months ago