正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Breaking News: Context: Meredith O’Neil successfully obtained an Emergency Restraining Order against Aiden Kearney last week. The details and affidavit was ordered by the Judge to be impounded. According to report from Aiden Kearney, only his Attorney Tim Bradl has copy of Meredith’s affidavit and submissions and he was...

21,295 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

BREAKING: Teacher Enoch Burke thrown into prison van and moved suddenly to Castlerea Prison On Sunday morning teacher Enoch Burke was told to gather his belongings and bring them to a prison van. He was then put into the van and brought on a two-and-a-half-hour journey to a new location, Castlerea Prison. At no point was he told where he was being brought, or for what reason. Upon arrival in Castlerea Prison he was consigned to a filthy committal landing. Prison authorities told him he was being given a job “in the kitchen.” Enoch Burke has a job. He is a teacher of German and History at Wilson’s Hospital School. He was taken from that job in 2022 and thrown into a prison cell by corrupt judges after he refused to endorse transgender ideology. His incarceration is an abomination. Enoch Burke’s removal from Mountjoy Prison is a violation of the order of Judge Brian Cregan of 19 January. That order specifically stated that Enoch Burke was to be detained in Mountjoy Prison in Dublin until further order of the High Court: “AND IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant be conveyed by the Commissioner and Members of An Garda Síochána to Mountjoy Prison and that he thereupon be lodged in Mountjoy Prison to be detained therein until he purges his contempt and is discharged pursuant to further Order of this Court”. There has been no further order. Enoch Burke, an innocent man, is now detained in Castlerea Prison without lawful authority. The removal to Castlerea Prison is deeply prejudicial to Enoch Burke as he is now over two hours from the courts where cases relating to his unjust incarceration are ongoing. Today Dr Isaac Burke raised this urgent matter before Judge Brian Cregan in the High Court. Judge Cregan prevaricated and obfuscated in response. He denied any knowledge of the development and showed little interest in the violation by the prison authorities of his own order. It is a dangerous state of affairs when a matter of this importance, the unlawful detention of an innocent man, can be taken so lightly by a High Court Judge.

Enoch Burke

159,566 次观看 • 4 个月前

AIDAN KEARNEY CRASHES OUT DURING HIS REVISIONIST HISTORY: TRUTH VS FICTION Last night, Aidan Kearney had a complete meltdown when the topic of his treatment of the O'Keefes came up. FICTION: Kearney claims the O'Keefes tried to send him to jail over hurt feelings. TRUTH: For months starting in May of 2023, Kearney regularly attacked the O'Keefes on his live show and in articles at the behest of Karen Read. Karen had told Kearney "John's family sucks" and "we don't sit with stupid", green lighting the attacks on them. Repeatedly he called Peggie O'Keefe a c#nt, John's friends and family "maggots" who should "burn in hell", and refused to take down leaked autopsy photos of John when Paul asked because they were upsetting to John's niece and nephew who John had been raising. Those who loved John were forced to walk through a hostile mob of Read and Kearney followers when they would attend pretrial hearings in John's case. Through actions entirely of his own accord, Kearney was the subject of a restraining order in 2024. The O'Keefes and friends attended a hearing early that year. With them was Lindsey Gaetani who was the person who had pursued the restraining order. Kearney was forced to leave the hearing or face the consequences of violating the order. It was entirely on Kearney and his own actions whether or not he 1. violated the order and 2. whether or not those actions would send him to jail yet again. To the left is him spiraling out of control and to the right, a video in support of the witnesses from Testify, the organization created to support the witnesses. In the beginning of that video you can view the family walking through the angry, verbally abusive crowd on the very day Kearney claims Paul was trying to put him in jail. Visit for more information on Kearney and his followers abuse. Special thanks to Earl “Pink Crying Lady” Grey for asking Kearney the question about his abuse💗

Julie Carpenter

23,112 次观看 • 7 个月前

READ & KEARNEY LEGAL TEAMS USE INFORMATION FROM A KNOWN LIAR & FRAUDSTER TO FILE INFLAMMATORY MOTIONS: KEARNEY ADMITS HE KNEW IT WAS ALL LIES On March 28th, Read’s legal team filed a confounding motion for discovery requesting, among other things, any witnesses reluctant to testify, any witness who had been given an inducement, and any witness who would be changing their testimony. The motion was allowed with no objection by the Commonwealth, but that didn’t stop the confusion the motion had caused. Who didn’t want to testify? Who had been “induced”? Who had threatened to change testimony? And where was the Defense getting information that any of these things occurred? Things became a bit clearer on April 26th, when during his live show, Aidan Kearney went on a rant about a person with the initials “JD” regarding information this person had been supplying to Read’s team, specifically David Yannetti as well as his own attorneys. At the time, Kearney railed that he knew “everything about that” and that the information was “conspiratorial bullshit”. Further, Kearney threatened “JD” aka Jean from Dorchester aka Jean Colantonio, that she “better come through” or “shut the fuck up”. Two days later, on 04/28, Kearney’s legal team, led by Timothy J. Bradl, P.C. and Bederow Law, filed a motion to compel discovery with an affidavit from a redacted individual, the aforementioned “JD” from his rant, that contained wild claims such as the CW was paying Kate Peter $1500 a month via cash app, Jennifer McCabe had bribed Peter with a couch purchase, Lally admitted to jury tampering in the first trial during a lunch with Peter, among other fantastical claims, none of which were supported by any kind of documented evidence. Interestingly, neither Bradl nor Bederow penned the affidavit for JD. That job was left to the paralegal, Courtney Healy. Kearney proudly advertised the motion and affidavit on his blog and presented the claims as credible along with other smears directed towards Peter. He followed this up with tweet that included a picture of the affiant’s door covered in papers claiming the affiant was being harassed at her residence by Peter. The apartment “JD” lived in just happened to be located in the same apartment building Peter resides in. Strangely, the picture of “JD” that had been posted on her door with the word “RAT” written over her face was that of her driver’s license, something only “JD” would possess. In leaked texts this week, Kearney admitted he knew “JD” was lying, but a “sworn affidavit means something” which when paired with Kearney’s threats to “JD” on his live show, begins to give the appearance of coercion to suborn perjury. What’s worse, Kearney has allowed his legal team to this day to continue on with this farce including using information in the affidavit in other filings and oral arguments. And as bad as it looks at this point, there are also additional allegations of text messages which show Timothy Bradl was heavily involved in obtaining this information from “JD” and helping her retain counsel to clear open warrants she had. It is also alleged that a hotel room was paid for by a third party for “JD” and Bradl personally thanked the party for doing so. So what did Timothy J. Bradl, P.C. , Bederow Law, David Yannetti, and Alan Jackson know about “JD” when they supplied information to the court from this person? Did either of these legal teams do a cursory search of her background? I may be “just a random housewife with lace curtains” but even I was able to see within 30 minutes this person has a history of fraud. Why would either team take the risk of filing under oath motions that either contained suspect information or that may have been based on highly suspect information from an unreliable source with a history of lying? And finally, why did Bradl procure legal services and housing for the affiant? Were they in exchange for her sworn affidavit? We are all ears if any of them wish to answer or correct the record

Julie Carpenter

28,746 次观看 • 7 个月前