Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING: on October 31st, Canadian’s will be let go & Rogers will be giving operational control of the Rogers Wireless Network to workers in India. This is after Canadian staff were required to train their Indian counterparts, including some flying to Canada and others flying to India. After staggering...

282,016 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

33 Comments

Uneek design's profile picture
Uneek design11 months ago

I got half way through your post and I had to stop. I emailed Rogers, as a customer, and told them if they do this I'm leaving them. thanks Mario.

Cathy Dee🇨🇦's profile picture
Cathy Dee🇨🇦11 months ago

Let’s not forget the Bell Canada jobs that are also leaving Canada for India…

Tehking ❌🇨🇦's profile picture
Tehking ❌🇨🇦11 months ago

Our telecommunications business practices here are fucked. No real competition

Ǎ$$Â$$IN's profile picture
Ǎ$$Â$$IN11 months ago

So now all the Indian scam call centers will have full access to Canadian customers data. If they have access to texts, they can access text banking codes sent to their customers. I smell class action lawsuit!!!

Jamie Chirps 🇨🇦's profile picture
Jamie Chirps 🇨🇦11 months ago

Yep, I was just chatting with the Ontario fibre folks at about this. They're worried about people's data and infrastructure being compromised through moves like this Rogers one. Hopefully, people will realize how important it is to keep our data here. 🇨🇦

Maximus Decimus Meridius's profile picture
Maximus Decimus Meridius11 months ago

MORE LIES..Thats all you do man just give it a break..

coralcoral's profile picture
coralcoral11 months ago

that's fucking crazy! you don't send critical infrastructure anywere, and even less to a country known for having a scammers industry.

Dan Dicks's profile picture
Dan Dicks11 months ago

Im actually shocked...this is the first video I've seen where you don't point up at something!

𝕏 's profile picture
𝕏 11 months ago

Good thing I cancelled my wireless and internet plans @Rogers over the last 2 months. Was a life long customer. Close to 20 years with them and I had enough.

Docwatt's profile picture
Docwatt11 months ago

Moving to Telus, starlink and streaming feeds. Speaking with your wallet is the way.

heidiina's profile picture
heidiina11 months ago

When is elon making a starlink phone?

Paramvir Singh Sandhu's profile picture
Paramvir Singh Sandhu11 months ago

They should have not allowed Rogers to buy Shaw. Shaw customer service was based all in Canada.

Merlyn's profile picture
Merlyn11 months ago

Never should have been allowed to buy Shaw Cable, as so many of us warned

Reality Always Bats Last - Always's profile picture
Reality Always Bats Last - Always11 months ago

Odd how the Government protects cell phone providers from outside foreign competition, but turns away from watching those same protected companies outsourcing their CSR positions offshore. Nothing to see here, move along.

heather's profile picture
heather11 months ago

“Canadian staff”😂😂🙄Rogers is already controlled by Indians, I’m pretty sure we won’t even notice a difference. They all “work from home” anyways-half are probably already in India. And no, tfws are not a better solution🤦🏻‍♀️

Reality Always Bats Last - Always's profile picture
Reality Always Bats Last - Always11 months ago

Our local phone/internet provider was sold to Telus. We had to organize our migration to Telus. Spoke to a CSR, chickens crowing in the background, CSR was in the Philippines, working from home, it was 4am their time. This will be the same with Rogers.

WTF!'s profile picture
WTF!11 months ago

Elon needs to hurry up with that phone. Rogers needs to lose customers for this move.

kat2022's profile picture
kat202211 months ago

@fordnation @Rogers Rogers is supposed to be a Canadian company. I like that I get Canadians answering the calls. We even chat about the weather in the provinces. If Rogers wants Canadian money they need to back us and hire Canadians.

achi77es's profile picture
achi77es11 months ago

God I hate Rogers 😑😑😑

ɴᴇᴛᴀᴊɪ's profile picture
ɴᴇᴛᴀᴊɪ11 months ago

Stop blaming immigrants for your struggles. Update your résumé instead of attending LGBTQ parades, sharpen your skills, and compete that’s how real talent gets noticed, not through excuses.

Z3RØ's profile picture
Z3RØ11 months ago

After the security breaches at the airports NOTHING should be outsourced to these terrorists and scammers over the current population.

Roger's profile picture
Roger11 months ago

"Our wireless network is gonna be 2nd to none! 🤘👌" ~ Right Honourable Jeff

All For Him's profile picture
All For Him11 months ago

I got rid of Rogers last year. They are taking Canadian jobs away. All they care about is their bottom line.

Adrian D. Henderson's profile picture
Adrian D. Henderson11 months ago

Pull all levels of government contracts from Rogers services across the board. Might even be some security issues?

GrandmaSavage's profile picture
GrandmaSavage11 months ago

I can't stand talking to them now.. I was of understanding that under Cdn Law we as Canadians can demand to speak to a Canadian and be put through to one.

Shareaware Canada's profile picture
Shareaware Canada11 months ago

Our elections in BC are about to be controlled by India. previous Manitoba NDP CEO Shipra Verma. The parliamentary committee is as follows: * Janet Routledge, MLA, Burnaby North (chair) * Linda Hepner, MLA, Surrey-Serpentine River (deputy chair) * Tara Armstrong, MLA, Kelowna-Lake Country-Coldstream * Garry Begg, MLA, Surrey-Guildford * Harman Bhangu, MLA, Langley-Abbotsford * Stephanie Higginson, MLA, Ladysmith-Oceanside * Qwulti’stunaat / Debra Toporowski, MLA, Cowichan Valley

joey V's profile picture
joey V11 months ago

Cdn corporations and govt are more of an enemy to Canada then Trump

τao τemplar's profile picture
τao τemplar11 months ago

FYI you can get a phone plan with 5gb of data for $300/yr from Mexico. North American calls are free, AND THE PLAN WORKS WITHIN CANADA, no roaming. I'm never using a Canadian telecom monopoly again.

irish80ca's profile picture
irish80ca11 months ago

Just before his passing in 2008, Ted Rogers, founder of Rogers Communications, released Relentless: The True Story of the Man Behind Rogers Communications. The book chronicles his life and dedication to strengthening the CANADIAN economy by building a homegrown business empire.

frenchbulldoge's profile picture
frenchbulldoge11 months ago

What the F is happening in Canada ? This is not Normal ! It looks like corporate Canada is scuttling their businesses for some unknown reason. Is the USA poised to take CANADA SOON ! I hope so cause Under Indian control is gonna suck huge !

Hailey’s Mom's profile picture
Hailey’s Mom11 months ago

So glad that I dropped Rogers last month. Unfortunately there weren’t any great options to choose from because the industry of a few is an oligarchy

monocle9999's profile picture
monocle999911 months ago

I tried Vmedia about 7 years ago, when I had a problem - their customer care centre was in India. I boycotted them immediately.

The Great Gazoo's profile picture
The Great Gazoo11 months ago

Can Doug ford stomp on his Roger’s phone subscription at his next press conference? How do you say “elbows up” in Hindi?

Related Videos

The Government's trade deal with India will mean that it's cheaper to hire an Indian worker than a British one. Most other countries are perfectly happy to strike trade deals without forcing us to undercut our own workforce. We should have expected India to do the same. Instead, under the terms of our Free Trade Agreement with India, Indian companies will be able to transfer their workers to this country more easily. Once they're here, those workers will be able to avoid National Insurance payments for up to three years. The same is true for employers. Instead, both employee and employer will pay into the Indian social security system instead. This National Insurance exemption will make it much cheaper to hire Indian workers, in fields like IT and engineering, than to hire domestic talent. Let's imagine a British IT firm, set to hire a computer programmer for £60,000 a year. To hire them, an employer needs to spend £60,000 a year on their salary, plus £8,250 on Employer National Insurance. That's a total of £68,250. An Indian competitor with an office in London, meanwhile, can save money by transferring Indian workers to the UK, even if they pay the same headline salary. They’d still spend £60,000 on the salary - but instead of paying National Insurance, they pay into the Indian Employee Provident Fund instead. Mandatory contributions to the fund are capped at 15,000 rupees a month, or about £120. That means that, across a year, an employer only pays £1,470 into the social security system - for a total of £61,470. So under this Government's deal, it would be at least 10 percent cheaper to hire an Indian worker over a British one for this job. This is absurd. Over three years, it would be more than £20,000 cheaper for an Indian firm to bring over an Indian worker to London than to hire locally. The reason for this absurd arrangement is that the India deal includes a Double Contribution Convention. DCCs make it easier for international companies to transfer their workforce. They're designed to stop highly-skilled workers from paying into two different social security systems. We already have Double Contribution Conventions with other countries. However, these other countries tend to be either: (1) roughly as developed as the UK - in the case of countries like Canada or Japan, or (2) very small - in the case of countries like Jamaica. India is by far the poorest country on the list, and by far the largest. The net result of this deal will be more Indian workers in fields like IT and engineering, undercutting British workers. Given the relative markets in the UK and in India, we shouldn't expect this to automatically be a like-for-like swap in terms of talent. We've seen this happen in the US already, with Indian consultancies leasing their workers to American companies, who are then able to pay an Indian worker far less than they'd need to pay an American. The result has been a massive expansion in the number of lower-cost Indian workers, at the expense of American workers. We should not be allowing other countries to dictate the terms of our migration system, in exchange for some trade benefits at the margins. If India wants to trade, then we should trade. Migration shouldn't even come into the equation.

Katie Lam

167,617 views • 7 months ago