Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING: Pam Bondi’s own opening statement reportedly says she did NOT personally oversee the Epstein document review and instead delegated responsibility to Todd Blanche. Yes. The same Todd Blanche who is now Acting Attorney General. That detail matters enormously. Because for months Bondi has been one of the central...

265,115 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🔥MUST SEE! 🔥🔥 STING!🔥 Chapter 1. The Bust. The chamber fell into a stunned hush as Attorney General Pam Bondi reached into her black binder and withdrew a single sheet of paper. The label was unmistakable: "Jayapal Pramila Search History. "It was February 11, 2026, during a tense House Judiciary Committee hearing on the Department of Justice's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Earlier that week, the DOJ under the new administration had finally granted members of Congress limited in-person access to unredacted versions of the long-sought Epstein documents. Lawmakers could review them on secure DOJ computers, in private sessions, using their own logins. The promise was confidentiality, each member could explore the files without interference, armed only with their oversight authority and a burning need for answers. But the document Bondi now held told a different story. Printed neatly were timestamps, file numbers, and brief descriptions each entry corresponding to searches performed by Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) during her recent visit to the department. The list matched what Jayapal herself later confirmed she had queried. The DOJ, it turned out, had been logging every access who logged in, when, and exactly which documents they opened or searched. What was sold as a secure, member-only review had included invisible surveillance. The room erupted. Democrats leaped to their feet, voices overlapping in fury. "This is spying!" one shouted. "Blatant abuse of power!" another cried. Jayapal, her face flushed, accused Bondi of bringing a "burn book" to the hearing using the tracked data not for security, but to prepare partisan counterattacks and dodge real questions about the Epstein case. She called it a violation of separation of powers, an intimidation tactic aimed at lawmakers performing constitutional oversight. Bondi remained composed, but the revelation spread like wildfire across the Capitol. Other members who had quietly reviewed the files began to wonder: Had their own searches been cataloged too? Whispers turned to demands bipartisan in places for the DOJ to stop the tracking immediately, destroy the logs, and explain why such monitoring had been put in place without notice. The irony hung heavy in the air. Here were officials, entrusted with probing one of the most explosive scandals in modern memory a web of powerful figures potentially implicated in Epstein's crimes now furious at being watched themselves. Accusations flew: How could they condemn the surveillance without admitting curiosity about certain files? Some had reportedly searched terms or documents that, if exposed, might raise uncomfortable questions. Yet to fight the logging risked shining a spotlight on their own inquiries. The hearing adjourned amid chaos, but the fallout was only beginning. Democrats launched investigations, letters flew demanding full accounting, and even House Speaker Mike Johnson publicly chided the practice as inappropriate. Jayapal and allies vowed to pursue every avenue to end what they called "outrageous secret surveillance."In the shadows of the Epstein saga, a new layer of distrust had been laid bare not just between the public and the powerful, but among the powerful themselves. It was brilliant. Stay tuned. EPSTEIN FILES

Whiplash347

11,335 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten