Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING: Ray Epps has been charged for his role in the Capitol riots. Another conspiracy of the right comes to an end. I’m sure people will now claim the government is charging him with a misdemeanor just to cover up the truth. Fact is the evidence just isn’t there...

1,398,007 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹
Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹vor 2 Jahren

"Conspiracy theory"

Profilbild von Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassensteinvor 2 Jahren

What's the crime though that you charge him with?

Profilbild von Craig Chamberlin
Craig Chamberlinvor 2 Jahren

I wonder if Ray Epps will get 11 years like the 70+ year old couple who "blocked the entrance to an abortion clinic." 🤔

Profilbild von Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassensteinvor 2 Jahren

What crime could you charge him with?

Profilbild von Rare 🇺🇸
Rare 🇺🇸vor 2 Jahren

So reporting on the event gets you more time and heavier charges than instigating it. Why’d they hide him for years when we had video? Why they hunt down grandmas for simply walking through the Peoples House. It wasn’t in insurrection. It was an inside job to certify a fraud.

Profilbild von Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassensteinvor 2 Jahren

Who got time for merely reporting on the event?

Profilbild von ChuckTrades
ChuckTradesvor 2 Jahren

Why is his sentence so much lighter than others who did much much less?

Profilbild von Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassensteinvor 2 Jahren

@randominfo_gems Compare the crimes.

Profilbild von BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸
BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸vor 2 Jahren

Definitely no evidence to speak of:

Profilbild von 🇺🇸 MAGA Michelle S 🇺🇸
🇺🇸 MAGA Michelle S 🇺🇸vor 2 Jahren

Sorry Ed, that’s exactly what they are doing!! Watch he won’t see a day in jail because he’s a FED!

Ähnliche Videos

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.

Kyle Becker

5,835,202 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren