Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BREAKING: Recommendations for MAHA & First Do No Pharm film features in mainstream US television today 🔥 Key points : MILLIONS of people have been killed by medical research fraud Big Pharma should no long longer be allowed to test their own drugs and control the data The FDA... show more

Dr Aseem Malhotra

1,426,076 subscribers

133,735 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

The Don 🇺🇸1 year ago

Proud of you @DrAseemMalhotra Thank you .. #MAHA

Jason Vale1 year ago

Your Dad will be BEAMING with pride from above amazing man. You’re a genuine force for good 👊🏼

Burningrice1 year ago

@LadyLibertyinAZ They should NEVER have been able to test their own drugs. A five year old could tell you that.

Angelus iustitiae1 year ago

And millions more will be 👇🏻

DILLIRGAFA1 year ago

Dr Malhotra, thank you sounding the alarm on statins. I listened to your podcast a couple of years ago on Joe Rogan. I refused them last year when my doctor tried to prescribe them. I had to refuse again a few months later when he sent the script to the pharmacy. Yes I have borderline high LDL and always have. I guess turning 60 was the big deal. Stress test normal, cardiac calcium in the normal range, need to improve my diet a bit. There is no way I will put a statin in my body. The side effects especially the pain are hard no for me. I am already a chronic pain patient with severe facet syndrome. Implanted a SCS almost 6 years ago to not be on pain medication. Thank you.

Citizens MAHA—Mobilizing Advocacy to Heal America!1 year ago

A prohibition on Big Pharma being allowed to test their own drugs would likely require Congressional action but here are a few alternative actions I believe the FDA could take. These could be the subject of citizen petitions to the FDA. Mandate Independent Audits of Clinical Trial Data: Require independent third-party audits of all clinical trial data submitted for drug and vaccine approvals to ensure accuracy and integrity. These audits would be conducted by FDA-approved entities unaffiliated with the sponsor. Public Access to Clinical Trial Data: Require full transparency by mandating the public release of all clinical trial protocols, raw data, and results submitted to the FDA, subject to privacy protections. This data should be made available on a publicly accessible database managed by the FDA or a designated third party. Strengthen Oversight of Data Analysis: Require that data analysis and interpretation for pivotal clinical trials be conducted by independent biostatisticians or FDA-appointed experts, in addition to sponsor analyses. The sponsor’s role in the analysis should be limited to collaboration rather than sole control. Enhance Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures: Expand requirements for disclosure of financial relationships between sponsors, researchers, and trial sites in all clinical trial documents submitted to the FDA. The FDA should make these disclosures publicly available. Incentivize Independent Trials: Establish a voluntary program encouraging sponsors to use independent contract research organizations (CROs) to conduct clinical trials, with expedited review for submissions that meet enhanced independence and transparency criteria.

Lorath1 year ago

@RobertKennedyJr @realDonaldTrump are you listening?

North Norfolk Olly1 year ago

It SICKENS me to see YouTube content for kids interrupted with coercive ads for unnecessary and potentially harmful VACCINES!

FLOWERPOT1 year ago

The Australian TGA takes 97% of funding from Big Pharma. It is completely conflicted. It's totally WRONG!

Related Videos

Senior MAHA Advisor Calley Means scorches Big Pharma along with the Legacy Media for ignoring the MAHA report and pushing “medical guidance” that’s harming kids: “The media and the medical establishment is breaking their necks not to talk about the substance of this report.” “The true fake guidance has been from our medical authorities over the past 30 years. You know, telling kids to wear masks, to be 6ft apart, to take 80 Covid boosters over the course of their life.” “Telling teenage girls that they should be taking SSRIs instead of putting down their phone, which they're on for eight hours a day, telling young boys they should be taking Adderall, a methamphetamine, instead of going outside and playing more.” “The MAHA report is the most honest assessment in the history of the US Government on ultra processed food, environmental toxins, vaccine injury over medicalization, chronic stress. It a bold, mature invitation from the Trump administration to have a mature conversation about these existential issues.” “That is a invitation that the mainstream media and the medical establishment is ignoring.”

Senior MAHA Advisor Calley Means scorches Big Pharma along with the Legacy Media for ignoring the MAHA report and pushing “medical guidance” that’s harming kids: “The media and the medical establishment is breaking their necks not to talk about the substance of this report.” “The true fake guidance has been from our medical authorities over the past 30 years. You know, telling kids to wear masks, to be 6ft apart, to take 80 Covid boosters over the course of their life.” “Telling teenage girls that they should be taking SSRIs instead of putting down their phone, which they're on for eight hours a day, telling young boys they should be taking Adderall, a methamphetamine, instead of going outside and playing more.” “The MAHA report is the most honest assessment in the history of the US Government on ultra processed food, environmental toxins, vaccine injury over medicalization, chronic stress. It a bold, mature invitation from the Trump administration to have a mature conversation about these existential issues.” “That is a invitation that the mainstream media and the medical establishment is ignoring.”

Benny Johnson

87,027 views • 1 year ago

This is going to blow your mind Dr Bryan Ardis EXPOSES The FDA created a process that allows Big Pharma TO BUY THEIR OWN DRUG APPROVALS It costs $10 million dollars “Big Pharma buys the FDA's approval. In fact — like 30 years ago, the FDA stopped having to do all the review process for all drugs (approved through this process) If you just paid a lump fee up front. Drug maker, you want to pay us $10 million up front? We'll automatically allow you to start selling this right now. Put it on the shelves. If you believe, and can prove in your own research studies, that trust us must not be biased at all, you give us a $10 million upfront stipend, we'll just go ahead and approve it” So Big Pharma is allowed to provide their own research, of their own clinical trials (totally not bias), and for $10 million dollars they get fast tracked through the process and get an approval Absolutely insane

This is going to blow your mind Dr Bryan Ardis EXPOSES The FDA created a process that allows Big Pharma TO BUY THEIR OWN DRUG APPROVALS It costs $10 million dollars “Big Pharma buys the FDA's approval. In fact — like 30 years ago, the FDA stopped having to do all the review process for all drugs (approved through this process) If you just paid a lump fee up front. Drug maker, you want to pay us $10 million up front? We'll automatically allow you to start selling this right now. Put it on the shelves. If you believe, and can prove in your own research studies, that trust us must not be biased at all, you give us a $10 million upfront stipend, we'll just go ahead and approve it” So Big Pharma is allowed to provide their own research, of their own clinical trials (totally not bias), and for $10 million dollars they get fast tracked through the process and get an approval Absolutely insane

Wall Street Apes

191,157 views • 1 year ago

Far too many people suffering from long COVID have struggled to get their symptoms taken seriously – by the medical community, by the media, and by Congress. That should not be happening in the United States of America. It is time for us to act to address this crisis.

Far too many people suffering from long COVID have struggled to get their symptoms taken seriously – by the medical community, by the media, and by Congress. That should not be happening in the United States of America. It is time for us to act to address this crisis.

Sen. Bernie Sanders

376,302 views • 2 years ago

The FDA has been the victim of a horrible rumor that 50% of their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry In response they’ve released an official report of their funding to prove everyone wrong Officially 47% of their funding comes from Big Pharma (holy sh*t) “So think about that. The people that you're supposed to be making rules and regulations for, are the same people that are paying you money. Seems like a conflict of interest, no?”

The FDA has been the victim of a horrible rumor that 50% of their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry In response they’ve released an official report of their funding to prove everyone wrong Officially 47% of their funding comes from Big Pharma (holy sh*t) “So think about that. The people that you're supposed to be making rules and regulations for, are the same people that are paying you money. Seems like a conflict of interest, no?”

Wall Street Apes

1,109,908 views • 1 year ago

In his powerful presentation Dr Pierre Kory educated over 20 UK MPs on the devastating fraud perpetrated against Ivermectin by Big Pharma. Noting that some of the greatest and most impactful fraud occurred on their own turf. Slamming the universities of Liverpool and Oxford for manipulating data and withholding results. Kory said the WHO was directly responsible for millions and millions of deaths as they refused to recommend ivermectin despite knowing it reduced mortality by 81%. The data presented can no longer be denied.

In his powerful presentation Dr Pierre Kory educated over 20 UK MPs on the devastating fraud perpetrated against Ivermectin by Big Pharma. Noting that some of the greatest and most impactful fraud occurred on their own turf. Slamming the universities of Liverpool and Oxford for manipulating data and withholding results. Kory said the WHO was directly responsible for millions and millions of deaths as they refused to recommend ivermectin despite knowing it reduced mortality by 81%. The data presented can no longer be denied.

Kat A 🌸

171,158 views • 2 years ago

🔥Robert F. Kennedy Jr says he sees a way to get rid of Big Pharma Ads “We're looking at this now with the White House, the ways that we can get by that Supreme Court decision.” The United States and New Zealand are the only countries IN THE WORLD that allow pharma companies to market their prescription drugs directly to consumers. There is no question that it is an entirely unethical and dangerous practice that MUST BE STOPPED.

🔥Robert F. Kennedy Jr says he sees a way to get rid of Big Pharma Ads “We're looking at this now with the White House, the ways that we can get by that Supreme Court decision.” The United States and New Zealand are the only countries IN THE WORLD that allow pharma companies to market their prescription drugs directly to consumers. There is no question that it is an entirely unethical and dangerous practice that MUST BE STOPPED.

Children’s Health Defense

32,840 views • 1 year ago

Holy smokes. Suspicions confirmed. Former Pharma insider tells Tucker Carlson that the true goal of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs but to BUY OFF the news media. This is described as an "open secret" within the pharmaceutical industry. TUCKER: You're saying that pharma buys TV spots not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their physicians, but to subvert the news business? CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma. TUCKER: I never thought of that. CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma. This is an open secret. The kind of silly ads you see between the news breaks, the points of that is not — it's largely to impact the customer. But the pharma has already got that. They've already bought off the doctors. They're good on that. No, this is an open secret. The news ad spending from pharma is a public relations lobbying tactic, essentially to buy off the news. They're not investigating pharma. The news has become basically a referee. That you are a terrible anti-science luddite for asking why the shots that we require our kids to get, that fundamentally by their own advertising change the immune system of that child for life... To even ask that question, the news referees that and calls you anti-science. When the two largest vaccine makers in the country are literally criminal enterprises, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, in the past five years, have settled two of the largest criminal penalties in American corporate history for bribing doctors and creating misleading research for the two largest vaccine makers. So you literally have the media playing referee that you can't even ask a question. TUCKER: If you have a vaccine injury and many people have, including some I know very well, even a profound vaccine injury, you're not allowed to complain about it. CALLEY MEANS: No, you're "anti-science." TUCKER: Even if it can be shown to us that this is a vaccine injury? CALLEY MEANS: The media plays referee because they're funded by so, on all levels. TUCKER: This is very dark, Calley Means.

Holy smokes. Suspicions confirmed. Former Pharma insider tells Tucker Carlson that the true goal of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs but to BUY OFF the news media. This is described as an "open secret" within the pharmaceutical industry. TUCKER: You're saying that pharma buys TV spots not to convince people to ask for specific drugs from their physicians, but to subvert the news business? CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma. TUCKER: I never thought of that. CALLEY MEANS: This is an open secret working for pharma. This is an open secret. The kind of silly ads you see between the news breaks, the points of that is not — it's largely to impact the customer. But the pharma has already got that. They've already bought off the doctors. They're good on that. No, this is an open secret. The news ad spending from pharma is a public relations lobbying tactic, essentially to buy off the news. They're not investigating pharma. The news has become basically a referee. That you are a terrible anti-science luddite for asking why the shots that we require our kids to get, that fundamentally by their own advertising change the immune system of that child for life... To even ask that question, the news referees that and calls you anti-science. When the two largest vaccine makers in the country are literally criminal enterprises, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, in the past five years, have settled two of the largest criminal penalties in American corporate history for bribing doctors and creating misleading research for the two largest vaccine makers. So you literally have the media playing referee that you can't even ask a question. TUCKER: If you have a vaccine injury and many people have, including some I know very well, even a profound vaccine injury, you're not allowed to complain about it. CALLEY MEANS: No, you're "anti-science." TUCKER: Even if it can be shown to us that this is a vaccine injury? CALLEY MEANS: The media plays referee because they're funded by so, on all levels. TUCKER: This is very dark, Calley Means.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

4,094,449 views • 2 years ago

Dr David Bell, a former WHO senior medical officer warns that the WHO is no longer operating as originally intended to provide guidance and coordination. They no longer serve the people but have been hijacked by Bill Gates and globalists to do their bidding only. The WHO are a bunch of bureaucrats not experts and should in no way be responsible for dictating global health policy.

Dr David Bell, a former WHO senior medical officer warns that the WHO is no longer operating as originally intended to provide guidance and coordination. They no longer serve the people but have been hijacked by Bill Gates and globalists to do their bidding only. The WHO are a bunch of bureaucrats not experts and should in no way be responsible for dictating global health policy.

Kat A 🌸

887,508 views • 2 years ago

From Netanyahu Campaigns to Big Food Clients. Why Susie Wiles Alarms the MAHA Base Is Trump’s own chief of staff, Susie Wiles, quietly sabotaging the America First and Make America Healthy Again agenda? Mike Adams argues her track record speaks for itself. From lobbying on behalf of some of the worst corporate actors in America to previously campaigning for Netanyahu, none of it lines up with a grassroots, anti‑swamp movement. Instead of taking the obvious step of ripping ultra‑processed junk out of school lunches, this White House is now leaning into subsidized weight‑loss injections. A massive win for Big Pharma and Big Food, and a loss for basic nutrition reform. Susie Wiles has spent years representing many of the same companies at the heart of America’s health and corruption crises. So whose interests are really setting policy? HealthRanger joins us to dig into her history, her influence, and what it means for the future of the America First movement.

From Netanyahu Campaigns to Big Food Clients. Why Susie Wiles Alarms the MAHA Base Is Trump’s own chief of staff, Susie Wiles, quietly sabotaging the America First and Make America Healthy Again agenda? Mike Adams argues her track record speaks for itself. From lobbying on behalf of some of the worst corporate actors in America to previously campaigning for Netanyahu, none of it lines up with a grassroots, anti‑swamp movement. Instead of taking the obvious step of ripping ultra‑processed junk out of school lunches, this White House is now leaning into subsidized weight‑loss injections. A massive win for Big Pharma and Big Food, and a loss for basic nutrition reform. Susie Wiles has spent years representing many of the same companies at the heart of America’s health and corruption crises. So whose interests are really setting policy? HealthRanger joins us to dig into her history, her influence, and what it means for the future of the America First movement.

Redacted

35,197 views • 1 month ago

EXPOSED: Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren is owned by Big Pharma, that’s why she wants to block RFK Jr as HHS Secretary Anna Matson exposes Elizabeth Warren lobbyist payments: - $125,000 from pharmaceuticals - $491,000 from health professionals - $108,000 from hospitals - Totaling $871,000 from the Healthcare Industry - Carla Jerviston’s Super PAC gave a whopping $14.6 million to support Elizabeth Warren for the Senate. She is a physician, she is Big Pharma. She helped fund the construction of the new Stanford Medical Center - Other reports have Elizabeth Warren taking over $5.2 million from the Healthcare Industry when you add up all revenue sources There are many more Big Pharma ties to Elizabeth Warren mentioned in this video Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren is literally TAKING MONEY as bribes to make sure CHILDREN AND ADULTS keep getting poisoned by Big Pharma and Big Food for profit There is no evil greater than this. It’s incomprehensible how evil Elizabeth Warren is. She wants you and American children poisoned for her own personal profit

EXPOSED: Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren is owned by Big Pharma, that’s why she wants to block RFK Jr as HHS Secretary Anna Matson exposes Elizabeth Warren lobbyist payments: - $125,000 from pharmaceuticals - $491,000 from health professionals - $108,000 from hospitals - Totaling $871,000 from the Healthcare Industry - Carla Jerviston’s Super PAC gave a whopping $14.6 million to support Elizabeth Warren for the Senate. She is a physician, she is Big Pharma. She helped fund the construction of the new Stanford Medical Center - Other reports have Elizabeth Warren taking over $5.2 million from the Healthcare Industry when you add up all revenue sources There are many more Big Pharma ties to Elizabeth Warren mentioned in this video Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren is literally TAKING MONEY as bribes to make sure CHILDREN AND ADULTS keep getting poisoned by Big Pharma and Big Food for profit There is no evil greater than this. It’s incomprehensible how evil Elizabeth Warren is. She wants you and American children poisoned for her own personal profit

Wall Street Apes

436,731 views • 1 year ago

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Holy Moly! Listeners are STUNNED as popular Australian podcaster and radio host Chris Smith apologizes for promoting the harmful COVID vaccines on air. --------------------------------------- Every major study that I've looked at, mainstream study, mainstream study has told me how wrong I was during the pandemic. To believe government to believe Big Pharma to believe eminent immunologists was wrong. And it's proved that way. I got it wrong. I wish. I wish I'd known then what I knew then. But I had eminent immuno... anyway, no excuse. I should have. I should have considered that it was taking too quick a time to put a vaccine on the market and we should have been a lot more, you know, we should have scrutinised it a lot more. Having said that, people need to do their own research. From Cleveland, Oxford University and from New Zealand, three mainstream studies showing that the injuries that have occurred from and the deaths that have occurred from the COVID vaccine have exceeded all the advice we got from Big Pharma. There are people in mainstream media who need to wake up, not go with what, you know, the narrative is in their newsroom, or the narrative might be from their bosses, and they're desperate to keep their jobs. They need to go and do their proper due diligence and homework on some of these mainstream studies that have come out ---------------------------------------- H/T: RosieM

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Holy Moly! Listeners are STUNNED as popular Australian podcaster and radio host Chris Smith apologizes for promoting the harmful COVID vaccines on air. --------------------------------------- Every major study that I've looked at, mainstream study, mainstream study has told me how wrong I was during the pandemic. To believe government to believe Big Pharma to believe eminent immunologists was wrong. And it's proved that way. I got it wrong. I wish. I wish I'd known then what I knew then. But I had eminent immuno... anyway, no excuse. I should have. I should have considered that it was taking too quick a time to put a vaccine on the market and we should have been a lot more, you know, we should have scrutinised it a lot more. Having said that, people need to do their own research. From Cleveland, Oxford University and from New Zealand, three mainstream studies showing that the injuries that have occurred from and the deaths that have occurred from the COVID vaccine have exceeded all the advice we got from Big Pharma. There are people in mainstream media who need to wake up, not go with what, you know, the narrative is in their newsroom, or the narrative might be from their bosses, and they're desperate to keep their jobs. They need to go and do their proper due diligence and homework on some of these mainstream studies that have come out ---------------------------------------- H/T: RosieM

aussie17

192,096 views • 1 year ago

New study looked into our food in America and found its chemical composition is engineered to be so addictive, it should be regulated like cigarettes “AlarmIng information also from a new study about the food that we eat. Ultra processed foods like pop and sweets are, quote, ‘carefully engineered to encourage consumption and should be regulated like cigarettes.’ The study in an academic health journal looked at the design, marketing and distribution of ultra processed foods and how they mirror tactics used by the tobacco industry.” “The Millbank Quarterly concludes that these foods should be considered addictive as they optimize craving, rapid intake, repeated use and come with some very serious health risks.”

New study looked into our food in America and found its chemical composition is engineered to be so addictive, it should be regulated like cigarettes “AlarmIng information also from a new study about the food that we eat. Ultra processed foods like pop and sweets are, quote, ‘carefully engineered to encourage consumption and should be regulated like cigarettes.’ The study in an academic health journal looked at the design, marketing and distribution of ultra processed foods and how they mirror tactics used by the tobacco industry.” “The Millbank Quarterly concludes that these foods should be considered addictive as they optimize craving, rapid intake, repeated use and come with some very serious health risks.”

Wall Street Apes

31,442 views • 6 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On the debate around the Sanchar Saathi app, Union Minister for Communications Jyotiraditya Scindia says, "Do not go by what the rumours are in the public domain. 7B also does not say that you cannot uninstall the app. The problem is that a lot of reality is lost if you don't go into the details. 7B only says that the phones should have the apps installed and there should be no hindrance for the user to be able to access them, and it should not be disabled so that the user cannot use it. Nowhere does 7B say that the user cannot delete the app. 7B is not for users; it is for the installation of the app by the manufacturers. 7B has been misconstrued... I have said in the Parliament that we have only one aim, that is the safety of the common people. We have to save the common people from this cancer called fraud... Now we need to decide between saving people from this fraud or letting this fraud continue... From the feedback we have received, we are ready to amend the rules, and I have said it in the Parliament. We are not adamant..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On the debate around the Sanchar Saathi app, Union Minister for Communications Jyotiraditya Scindia says, "Do not go by what the rumours are in the public domain. 7B also does not say that you cannot uninstall the app. The problem is that a lot of reality is lost if you don't go into the details. 7B only says that the phones should have the apps installed and there should be no hindrance for the user to be able to access them, and it should not be disabled so that the user cannot use it. Nowhere does 7B say that the user cannot delete the app. 7B is not for users; it is for the installation of the app by the manufacturers. 7B has been misconstrued... I have said in the Parliament that we have only one aim, that is the safety of the common people. We have to save the common people from this cancer called fraud... Now we need to decide between saving people from this fraud or letting this fraud continue... From the feedback we have received, we are ready to amend the rules, and I have said it in the Parliament. We are not adamant..."

ANI

34,234 views • 8 months ago

"I want to describe to you the life of a non-vaccinated person in Israel today. Our life has been destroyed, and we woke up to a nightmare in which we have have been kidnapped by our own government, who sold us to be guinea pigs to an experimental vaccine. They want us to give up our bodies and our souls with no questions. We have become the biggest clinical trial of a vaccine in history in the scale of an entire country" Listen to this testimony from an Israeli citizen on what life was like for an unvaccinated person in Israel at the beginning of the insane vaccination campaign and mass experiment on the Israeli people. What's the difference between Israel experimenting on millions of their own citizens and killing thousands of them with forceful coercion techniques, and them bombing a hospital in Gaza killing 500? or letting Hamas kill their people as justification for the war and perpetuation of more death. If we just go by the numbers, shouldn't we all be far more outraged about the vaccine? That death toll is easily over a million globally now, perhaps even tens of millions. Why should I trust the government that did this to their own people? Why should I listen to any government that did this to their people? It's willful murder no matter how you spin it, and we should all know by now that the denial of such evils by all the authorities that people are still clinging to for the truth, or the ignorance/negligence excuse that they didn't know, is a complete and utter BS lie. They had a clear purpose with the vaccines and knew exactly what they were doing, just as they have a clear purpose now with war and propaganda that comes with it. Depopulation.

"I want to describe to you the life of a non-vaccinated person in Israel today. Our life has been destroyed, and we woke up to a nightmare in which we have have been kidnapped by our own government, who sold us to be guinea pigs to an experimental vaccine. They want us to give up our bodies and our souls with no questions. We have become the biggest clinical trial of a vaccine in history in the scale of an entire country" Listen to this testimony from an Israeli citizen on what life was like for an unvaccinated person in Israel at the beginning of the insane vaccination campaign and mass experiment on the Israeli people. What's the difference between Israel experimenting on millions of their own citizens and killing thousands of them with forceful coercion techniques, and them bombing a hospital in Gaza killing 500? or letting Hamas kill their people as justification for the war and perpetuation of more death. If we just go by the numbers, shouldn't we all be far more outraged about the vaccine? That death toll is easily over a million globally now, perhaps even tens of millions. Why should I trust the government that did this to their own people? Why should I listen to any government that did this to their people? It's willful murder no matter how you spin it, and we should all know by now that the denial of such evils by all the authorities that people are still clinging to for the truth, or the ignorance/negligence excuse that they didn't know, is a complete and utter BS lie. They had a clear purpose with the vaccines and knew exactly what they were doing, just as they have a clear purpose now with war and propaganda that comes with it. Depopulation.

Inversionism

642,685 views • 2 years ago

This makes a mockery of our entire political system and our constitution The oath is supposed to be understood as well as given We have a common language in the UK, it's English This should be the only language you can take an oath in Why are they allowed to declare they don't care for their oaths before swearing them? What's the point in an oath that they clearly have no intention of keeping? None of these people should be allowed to take part in politics They are subversives and traitors, they should be treated as such

This makes a mockery of our entire political system and our constitution The oath is supposed to be understood as well as given We have a common language in the UK, it's English This should be the only language you can take an oath in Why are they allowed to declare they don't care for their oaths before swearing them? What's the point in an oath that they clearly have no intention of keeping? None of these people should be allowed to take part in politics They are subversives and traitors, they should be treated as such

Basil the Great

34,950 views • 2 months ago

NEW: Joe Lonsdale shocks CNBC on AI regulation debate: Andrew Ross Sorkin: Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Joe: The FDA has killed millions of people... Andrew: Killed?? Joe: Massive bureaucracy makes it cost 10 or 100X more than it should... there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do... China would love for us to have a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. Andrew Ross Sorkin: We're all trying to figure out what this could look like. Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Is that a good thing or a bad thing for somebody who's thinking the way you do? Joe: Listen, the FDA has killed millions of people. Let's be totally clear, right? Andrew: Killed?? Joe: It's literally led to the deaths of millions of people, Andrew... There's all these new therapies, especially now, by the way, with AI that we could be developing... Andrew: It's also hopefully saved some lives... Joe: I mean the trade off is probably 100 to 1. There's a very famous story from 60 years ago where they caught some stuff that was killing people in Europe and saved them here. They've used that as an excuse to make this massive bureaucracy that makes it cost 10 or 100 times more to do drugs than it should, which means there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do. I would be investing billions more to save lives, but I can't. So the equivalent is terrifying to me. The government is bad at these things. The bureaucrats are bad at these things. Now there's a there's another argument here, which is that you have things like Mythos and OpenAI's new technology that's really, really good at hacking into everything. And you probably don't want like, that new technology going to the bad guys right away. So there has to be some sort of trade off, some sort of framework. We have to be really careful not to make the mistakes the FDA has made. Andrew: So what would you do? What do you think that should look like? Joe: There probably should be some national agreement on regulation on new powerful models. It should be as small and as narrow as possible. It should not have the same bureaucracy. You should make sure the government from the start, has metrics on the speed at which it has to go and the transparency, because you're gonna have cronyism, you're gonna have the big guys capture it. You're going to slow it down. Pharma loves the FDA against biotech. It makes it too expensive for us to build our own pharma companies. We have to sell to them. This is what the big guys want. Google and Microsoft and OpenAI and the rest of them, they want to create rules to make it so they can... Andrew: They've all been calling for it. I mean, you remember Sam Altman, Dario, others early on said, "Regulate us; you need to regulate us. Please, regulate us." The question is was that a genuine call for action or do you think that was a "We think Washington's never going to do this. So we'll say it, and get some nice PR points." Joe: If you are the leader in the space and you have tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars, you want there to be really complicated regulation with people you can hire who go in and out of your company, who work there because you know you're going to be able to control it and influence it. ...And by the way, China has pre-IND (Investigational New Drug process) and IND of 30 and 60 days about right now. We have 200 and 500 days. And so we've completely delayed anything we do. We've handed more than a third now of our biotech sector to China in the last six years because we're so slow. We definitely don't want to do that on the AI side. That would be a disaster. China would love for us to do a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. We cannot allow that to happen. Squawk Box

NEW: Joe Lonsdale shocks CNBC on AI regulation debate: Andrew Ross Sorkin: Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Joe: The FDA has killed millions of people... Andrew: Killed?? Joe: Massive bureaucracy makes it cost 10 or 100X more than it should... there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do... China would love for us to have a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. Andrew Ross Sorkin: We're all trying to figure out what this could look like. Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Is that a good thing or a bad thing for somebody who's thinking the way you do? Joe: Listen, the FDA has killed millions of people. Let's be totally clear, right? Andrew: Killed?? Joe: It's literally led to the deaths of millions of people, Andrew... There's all these new therapies, especially now, by the way, with AI that we could be developing... Andrew: It's also hopefully saved some lives... Joe: I mean the trade off is probably 100 to 1. There's a very famous story from 60 years ago where they caught some stuff that was killing people in Europe and saved them here. They've used that as an excuse to make this massive bureaucracy that makes it cost 10 or 100 times more to do drugs than it should, which means there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do. I would be investing billions more to save lives, but I can't. So the equivalent is terrifying to me. The government is bad at these things. The bureaucrats are bad at these things. Now there's a there's another argument here, which is that you have things like Mythos and OpenAI's new technology that's really, really good at hacking into everything. And you probably don't want like, that new technology going to the bad guys right away. So there has to be some sort of trade off, some sort of framework. We have to be really careful not to make the mistakes the FDA has made. Andrew: So what would you do? What do you think that should look like? Joe: There probably should be some national agreement on regulation on new powerful models. It should be as small and as narrow as possible. It should not have the same bureaucracy. You should make sure the government from the start, has metrics on the speed at which it has to go and the transparency, because you're gonna have cronyism, you're gonna have the big guys capture it. You're going to slow it down. Pharma loves the FDA against biotech. It makes it too expensive for us to build our own pharma companies. We have to sell to them. This is what the big guys want. Google and Microsoft and OpenAI and the rest of them, they want to create rules to make it so they can... Andrew: They've all been calling for it. I mean, you remember Sam Altman, Dario, others early on said, "Regulate us; you need to regulate us. Please, regulate us." The question is was that a genuine call for action or do you think that was a "We think Washington's never going to do this. So we'll say it, and get some nice PR points." Joe: If you are the leader in the space and you have tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars, you want there to be really complicated regulation with people you can hire who go in and out of your company, who work there because you know you're going to be able to control it and influence it. ...And by the way, China has pre-IND (Investigational New Drug process) and IND of 30 and 60 days about right now. We have 200 and 500 days. And so we've completely delayed anything we do. We've handed more than a third now of our biotech sector to China in the last six years because we're so slow. We definitely don't want to do that on the AI side. That would be a disaster. China would love for us to do a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. We cannot allow that to happen. Squawk Box

American Optimist

192,497 views • 3 months ago

A first of its kind government lawsuit has been launched against 11 Big Food companies for knowingly creating highly addictive, poisonous, ultra processed foods Companies being sued include giants like Kellogg and Coca-Cola Showing these foods are liked to obesity, cancer, diabetes and more “They're on nearly every shelf in nearly every grocery store across the country. Ultra-processed foods now make up over 50% of the American diet. Our case is about companies who design food to be harmful and addictive. In San Francisco today, City Attorney David Chiu announced the first government lawsuit of its kind against 11 companies that manufacture ultra-processed foods, including breakfast titan Kellogg and beverage maker Coca-Cola, accusing them of using unfair and deceptive marketing to sell food. We've known for a long time that the ingredients in many of these ultra-processed foods are unhealthy. — We have all suspected for a long time that food that is not food were likely not good for us, but it took many years for the science to catch up. Research has linked ultra-processed foods to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. In a statement, a trade group representing many of the companies named in the lawsuit said, There is currently no agreed-upon the scientific definition of ultra-processed foods and that calling them unhealthy is misleading to consumers. There's a clear definition in California law on what ultra-processed foods are — San Francisco has a history of taking on big business. They previously sued and won multi-million dollar lawsuits against big tobacco, lead paint and opioid manufacturers.“

A first of its kind government lawsuit has been launched against 11 Big Food companies for knowingly creating highly addictive, poisonous, ultra processed foods Companies being sued include giants like Kellogg and Coca-Cola Showing these foods are liked to obesity, cancer, diabetes and more “They're on nearly every shelf in nearly every grocery store across the country. Ultra-processed foods now make up over 50% of the American diet. Our case is about companies who design food to be harmful and addictive. In San Francisco today, City Attorney David Chiu announced the first government lawsuit of its kind against 11 companies that manufacture ultra-processed foods, including breakfast titan Kellogg and beverage maker Coca-Cola, accusing them of using unfair and deceptive marketing to sell food. We've known for a long time that the ingredients in many of these ultra-processed foods are unhealthy. — We have all suspected for a long time that food that is not food were likely not good for us, but it took many years for the science to catch up. Research has linked ultra-processed foods to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. In a statement, a trade group representing many of the companies named in the lawsuit said, There is currently no agreed-upon the scientific definition of ultra-processed foods and that calling them unhealthy is misleading to consumers. There's a clear definition in California law on what ultra-processed foods are — San Francisco has a history of taking on big business. They previously sued and won multi-million dollar lawsuits against big tobacco, lead paint and opioid manufacturers.“

Wall Street Apes

406,381 views • 8 months ago