Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING: Rep. Andy Biggs just submitted SEVERAL things into the record via a Unanimous Consent, and it TRUTH NUKES about Dems and Epstein that they don't want anyone to know: Biggs: "Bombshell new docs show Trump called police about Epstein in 2006." Jim Jordan: "Without objection." Biggs: "Plaskett defends...

GuntherEagleman's profile picture

Gunther Eagleman™

1,762,316 subscribers

788,022 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & PoliticsHealth & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

In the 20,000 pages of Jeffrey Epstein documents released it shows Democrat Stacey Plaskett was being personally text by Jeffrey Epstein during an Oversight Hearing while she questioned Trump’s former attorney He was feeding her what to say Plaskett took money from Epstein “Epstein messaged Delegate Stacey Plaskett while she questioned Michael Cohen. She was actively texting with Epstein during a 2019 House Oversight Committee hearing. While Plaskett grilled President Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, Epstein appeared to be providing real-time coaching, with time stamps matching her questions and his messages. Newly released estate texts are part of oversight committee pages. They come from the Oversight Committee, 20,000 pages released from the Epstein files. They show Epstein sending short notes to Democrat Delegate Stacey Plaskett — Records also show past donations from Epstein. She was actively being coached and paid by Epstein after he was convicted of sexual trafficking.“
1:35

In the 20,000 pages of Jeffrey Epstein documents released it shows Democrat Stacey Plaskett was being personally text by Jeffrey Epstein during an Oversight Hearing while she questioned Trump’s former attorney He was feeding her what to say Plaskett took money from Epstein “Epstein messaged Delegate Stacey Plaskett while she questioned Michael Cohen. She was actively texting with Epstein during a 2019 House Oversight Committee hearing. While Plaskett grilled President Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, Epstein appeared to be providing real-time coaching, with time stamps matching her questions and his messages. Newly released estate texts are part of oversight committee pages. They come from the Oversight Committee, 20,000 pages released from the Epstein files. They show Epstein sending short notes to Democrat Delegate Stacey Plaskett — Records also show past donations from Epstein. She was actively being coached and paid by Epstein after he was convicted of sexual trafficking.“

Wall Street Apes

1,055,241 views • 9 months ago

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Hakeem Jeffries was just CONFRONTED about the fact a Congressional Democrat COLLUDED with Jeffrey Epstein to harm Donald Trump in 2019. He did NOT expect this. REPORTER: "Why should Americans trust YOU and House Democrats on the Epstein files when one of your own - Congresswoman Plaskett - texted Epstein during a hearing...and he tells her, 'good job?'" JEFFRIES: This is a bipartisan effort...there is full and complete transparency...they can't escape accountability. Next. NO answer! Hakeem lost this issue. It's a political game to him.
0:40

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Hakeem Jeffries was just CONFRONTED about the fact a Congressional Democrat COLLUDED with Jeffrey Epstein to harm Donald Trump in 2019. He did NOT expect this. REPORTER: "Why should Americans trust YOU and House Democrats on the Epstein files when one of your own - Congresswoman Plaskett - texted Epstein during a hearing...and he tells her, 'good job?'" JEFFRIES: This is a bipartisan effort...there is full and complete transparency...they can't escape accountability. Next. NO answer! Hakeem lost this issue. It's a political game to him.

Eric Daugherty

1,081,758 views • 8 months ago

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins just put Hakeem Jeffries in the heat seat about Epstein for over two minutes straight on national television. Jeffries tried to dodge questions about his and his party’s connections, but Collins came at him like a locomotive. She started with Stacey Plaskett: COLLINS: “Do you think it was appropriate for her to be texting with Jeffrey Epstein, 11 years after he pleaded guilty?” JEFFRIES: “I mean, I have not had a conversation with Stacey Plaskett to discuss this issue because we’ve been focused today on making sure that there was a decisive vote as it related to the Epstein files and the release.” COLLINS: “Do you plan to talk to her about it?” JEFFRIES: “I think that we……successfully defeated a resolution that lacked any basis, was not credible and was being brought by an individual who was trying to weaponize this issue to reinvigorate his own failed gubernatorial campaign in south Carolina.” “It was rejected on a bipartisan basis on the floor today. That’s the end of the story.” COLLINS: “Yeah, I was just asking if you personally believe messaging with Jeffrey Epstein, who is at that point a registered sex offender, is appropriate for a member of the House Democratic caucus?” Jeffries, clearly feeling the hear, snapped back: JEFFRIES: “That’s the third time you’ve asked me this question, and I’m going to give you the same exact answer.” “Our focus today is on making sure that the Jeffrey Epstein files were released. If you want to have a conversation with Stacey Plaskett about it, I’m sure she’d be willing to talk to you.” “It was an illegitimate effort to try to remove her from the House Committee on Intelligence, and that was defeated in a bipartisan way.”
2:21

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins just put Hakeem Jeffries in the heat seat about Epstein for over two minutes straight on national television. Jeffries tried to dodge questions about his and his party’s connections, but Collins came at him like a locomotive. She started with Stacey Plaskett: COLLINS: “Do you think it was appropriate for her to be texting with Jeffrey Epstein, 11 years after he pleaded guilty?” JEFFRIES: “I mean, I have not had a conversation with Stacey Plaskett to discuss this issue because we’ve been focused today on making sure that there was a decisive vote as it related to the Epstein files and the release.” COLLINS: “Do you plan to talk to her about it?” JEFFRIES: “I think that we……successfully defeated a resolution that lacked any basis, was not credible and was being brought by an individual who was trying to weaponize this issue to reinvigorate his own failed gubernatorial campaign in south Carolina.” “It was rejected on a bipartisan basis on the floor today. That’s the end of the story.” COLLINS: “Yeah, I was just asking if you personally believe messaging with Jeffrey Epstein, who is at that point a registered sex offender, is appropriate for a member of the House Democratic caucus?” Jeffries, clearly feeling the hear, snapped back: JEFFRIES: “That’s the third time you’ve asked me this question, and I’m going to give you the same exact answer.” “Our focus today is on making sure that the Jeffrey Epstein files were released. If you want to have a conversation with Stacey Plaskett about it, I’m sure she’d be willing to talk to you.” “It was an illegitimate effort to try to remove her from the House Committee on Intelligence, and that was defeated in a bipartisan way.”

Overton

530,058 views • 8 months ago

BREAKING NEWS: My opponent Jim Jordan was just HUMILIATED on the House Floor by Rep. Swalwell after threatening to hold Attorney General Garland in contempt. This is so good!!!! 🔥 “My colleague just said you should be held in contempt of Congress. And that is quite rich because the guy who is leading the hearing room right now, Mr Jordan, is about 500 days into evading his subpoena…are you serious?” He’s right! My opponent Jim Jordan IGNORED a subpoena from the House Select Committee investigating the January 6th attack on the Capitol. He should be in PRISON. Jordan's refusal to comply with the subpoena is a serious obstruction of justice. It is also a betrayal of the American people, who deserve to know the truth about what happened on January 6th and who is responsible! Who agrees with me that Jim Jordan should be BARRED from running again for violating the Fourteenth Amendment! 🖐️
1:37

BREAKING NEWS: My opponent Jim Jordan was just HUMILIATED on the House Floor by Rep. Swalwell after threatening to hold Attorney General Garland in contempt. This is so good!!!! 🔥 “My colleague just said you should be held in contempt of Congress. And that is quite rich because the guy who is leading the hearing room right now, Mr Jordan, is about 500 days into evading his subpoena…are you serious?” He’s right! My opponent Jim Jordan IGNORED a subpoena from the House Select Committee investigating the January 6th attack on the Capitol. He should be in PRISON. Jordan's refusal to comply with the subpoena is a serious obstruction of justice. It is also a betrayal of the American people, who deserve to know the truth about what happened on January 6th and who is responsible! Who agrees with me that Jim Jordan should be BARRED from running again for violating the Fourteenth Amendment! 🖐️

Tamie

1,479,038 views • 2 years ago

🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE – REP. JIM JORDAN ON EPSTEIN FILES, FBI: “WE’LL GET THE TRUTH. TRUMP DID NOTHING WRONG.” Mario: “There are two topics dividing MAGA: what’s happening in Israel and Palestine, and the Epstein files." Rep. Jim Jordan : "I think the country deserves to get information, and we're facilitating that in our committee. FBI Director Wray will testify before us in two weeks. Attorney General Bondi is coming early next month. She’ll be asked about this and a host of others. I’ll be asking about information that both Kash and Pam have released regarding Adam Schiff allegedly leaking classified intel – according to a whistleblower. Oversight has already subpoenaed documents, deposed witnesses – and there’s more to come. I’m confident President Trump didn’t do anything wrong. If the Democrats had anything on him, they’d have used it already. They’ve lied and attacked him for years. So no – I’m not worried.”
1:44

🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE – REP. JIM JORDAN ON EPSTEIN FILES, FBI: “WE’LL GET THE TRUTH. TRUMP DID NOTHING WRONG.” Mario: “There are two topics dividing MAGA: what’s happening in Israel and Palestine, and the Epstein files." Rep. Jim Jordan : "I think the country deserves to get information, and we're facilitating that in our committee. FBI Director Wray will testify before us in two weeks. Attorney General Bondi is coming early next month. She’ll be asked about this and a host of others. I’ll be asking about information that both Kash and Pam have released regarding Adam Schiff allegedly leaking classified intel – according to a whistleblower. Oversight has already subpoenaed documents, deposed witnesses – and there’s more to come. I’m confident President Trump didn’t do anything wrong. If the Democrats had anything on him, they’d have used it already. They’ve lied and attacked him for years. So no – I’m not worried.”

Mario Nawfal

92,247 views • 11 months ago

🚨 BOOM: Jim Jordan just went FULL NUKE on the House floor and exposed the Democrats’ latest Epstein charade for EXACTLY what it is… 'We’re all voting YES to release the Epstein files… but let’s talk about WHY the Democrats are suddenly obsessed with Epstein AFTER doing NOTHING for four years. They REDACTED the name of a Virginia Giuffre, who already went PUBLIC and testified UNDER OATH that she NEVER saw President Trump do anything wrong. Why redact her name? Because it DESTROYS their narrative. They’ll leak, twist, and hide anything if they think it hurts Trump, even if it means protecting the memory of Jeffrey Epstein over actual victims.' He listed off the ten years of non-stop witch hunts: - Spying on his campaign - Mueller - Impeachment 1 - Impeachment 2 - Lawfare with Bragg, Fani, Tish - Jack Smith - Mar-a-Lago raid - 43-day government shutdown - FAKE outrage over Epstein The American people see right through this garbage. Pass the resolution, release the files, and get Congress BACK TO WORK for the American people. Their lies are NOT WORKING and they know it!
4:24

🚨 BOOM: Jim Jordan just went FULL NUKE on the House floor and exposed the Democrats’ latest Epstein charade for EXACTLY what it is… 'We’re all voting YES to release the Epstein files… but let’s talk about WHY the Democrats are suddenly obsessed with Epstein AFTER doing NOTHING for four years. They REDACTED the name of a Virginia Giuffre, who already went PUBLIC and testified UNDER OATH that she NEVER saw President Trump do anything wrong. Why redact her name? Because it DESTROYS their narrative. They’ll leak, twist, and hide anything if they think it hurts Trump, even if it means protecting the memory of Jeffrey Epstein over actual victims.' He listed off the ten years of non-stop witch hunts: - Spying on his campaign - Mueller - Impeachment 1 - Impeachment 2 - Lawfare with Bragg, Fani, Tish - Jack Smith - Mar-a-Lago raid - 43-day government shutdown - FAKE outrage over Epstein The American people see right through this garbage. Pass the resolution, release the files, and get Congress BACK TO WORK for the American people. Their lies are NOT WORKING and they know it!

Gunther Eagleman™

1,343,083 views • 8 months ago

Liz Crokin says Jeffrey Epstein was an Intelligence Asset, Bragged to Mossad that he had Blackmail on Prince Andrew and referred to him as his 'Super Bowl trophy'. "Jeffrey Epstein was running a blackmail intelligence operation... he was working with Mossad or was just flat out Mossad or maybe Mossad was working for him... we also know he was working with the CIA... This is Pandora's box that is about to be open. This investigation could prove Jeffrey Epstein without a shadow of a doubt that he was an intelligent asset and that's why he was trying to get state secrets from The U.K." "There are people that have even gone on the record and they have said that Jeffrey Epstein used to brag about how he basically had Prince Andrew completely blackmailed and he bragged about how he was giving all the information he got from Prince Andrew to Mossad."
3:55

Liz Crokin says Jeffrey Epstein was an Intelligence Asset, Bragged to Mossad that he had Blackmail on Prince Andrew and referred to him as his 'Super Bowl trophy'. "Jeffrey Epstein was running a blackmail intelligence operation... he was working with Mossad or was just flat out Mossad or maybe Mossad was working for him... we also know he was working with the CIA... This is Pandora's box that is about to be open. This investigation could prove Jeffrey Epstein without a shadow of a doubt that he was an intelligent asset and that's why he was trying to get state secrets from The U.K." "There are people that have even gone on the record and they have said that Jeffrey Epstein used to brag about how he basically had Prince Andrew completely blackmailed and he bragged about how he was giving all the information he got from Prince Andrew to Mossad."

Benny Johnson

214,872 views • 5 months ago

🚨 THE DEMOCRATS JUST GOT EXPOSED — ON THE HOUSE FLOOR Jim Jordan didn’t just speak today — he detonated a political truth bomb that ripped straight through the Democrats’ entire Epstein theatre. Jordan laid it out with surgical precision: “You had FOUR YEARS to release the Epstein files. You did NOTHING. Now suddenly you care — because you think you can twist it to hit President Trump.” And he proved it: Democrats redacted the name of a victim who already went public That same victim testified UNDER OATH that President Trump did NOTHING wrong So why hide her? Because it destroys their narrative They’d rather protect the memory of Jeffrey Epstein than tell the truth Then Jordan listed TEN YEARS of nonstop political warfare waged against President Trump: • Spying on his campaign • Mueller • Impeachment 1 • Impeachment 2 • Bragg • Fani • Tish • Jack Smith • Mar-a-Lago raid • 43-day shutdown • And now… FAKE OUTRAGE over Epstein Every playbook. Every lie. Every hoax. All for one goal: Stop Trump. But here’s the part that broke the room: “President Trump DID what he promised. That’s why they fear him.” This is not about victims. This is not about justice. This is not about Epstein. This is about Democrats losing control — and scrambling for their last narrative. Pass the resolution. Release the files. And get Congress back to work. America sees through every last bit of this.
4:24

🚨 THE DEMOCRATS JUST GOT EXPOSED — ON THE HOUSE FLOOR Jim Jordan didn’t just speak today — he detonated a political truth bomb that ripped straight through the Democrats’ entire Epstein theatre. Jordan laid it out with surgical precision: “You had FOUR YEARS to release the Epstein files. You did NOTHING. Now suddenly you care — because you think you can twist it to hit President Trump.” And he proved it: Democrats redacted the name of a victim who already went public That same victim testified UNDER OATH that President Trump did NOTHING wrong So why hide her? Because it destroys their narrative They’d rather protect the memory of Jeffrey Epstein than tell the truth Then Jordan listed TEN YEARS of nonstop political warfare waged against President Trump: • Spying on his campaign • Mueller • Impeachment 1 • Impeachment 2 • Bragg • Fani • Tish • Jack Smith • Mar-a-Lago raid • 43-day shutdown • And now… FAKE OUTRAGE over Epstein Every playbook. Every lie. Every hoax. All for one goal: Stop Trump. But here’s the part that broke the room: “President Trump DID what he promised. That’s why they fear him.” This is not about victims. This is not about justice. This is not about Epstein. This is about Democrats losing control — and scrambling for their last narrative. Pass the resolution. Release the files. And get Congress back to work. America sees through every last bit of this.

Jim Ferguson

53,188 views • 8 months ago

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Mark Zuckerberg the founder of Meta, formally known as Facebook and Instagram admits he regrets working with the Biden-Harris administration by censoring information online during the Covid era In a letter to Chairman Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee, writes that he "regrets" working with the Biden-Harris administration, which "repeatedly pressured" Meta's teams "for months" to censor COVID posts, including satire and humor: "I believe that government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it."
0:59

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Mark Zuckerberg the founder of Meta, formally known as Facebook and Instagram admits he regrets working with the Biden-Harris administration by censoring information online during the Covid era In a letter to Chairman Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee, writes that he "regrets" working with the Biden-Harris administration, which "repeatedly pressured" Meta's teams "for months" to censor COVID posts, including satire and humor: "I believe that government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it."

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

9,313,742 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., asked Attorney General Pam Bondi in an oversight hearing Wednesday to apologize to the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse. In a heated exchange, Jayapal asked Bondi to turn to the survivors in attendance “and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information.” Minutes of crosstalk and argument between Jayapal, Bondi, committee chair Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., followed. In her final seconds, Jayapal reiterated she believes the release of the Epstein files has been “a massive cover-up.” The Department of Justice has released millions of pages of Epstein-related documents, photographs and messages. But it missed its deadline by more than a month, and the releases have been mired by missed redactions and accusations of key omissions. Millions of pages related to the investigation into the late convicted sex offender remain inaccessible, though the White House defends its review as thorough and complete. A bipartisan group of lawmakers has demanded more transparency, accusing the government of failing to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed in November, and survivors released a Super Bowl ad telling Bondi that “it’s time for the truth.”
3:30

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., asked Attorney General Pam Bondi in an oversight hearing Wednesday to apologize to the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse. In a heated exchange, Jayapal asked Bondi to turn to the survivors in attendance “and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information.” Minutes of crosstalk and argument between Jayapal, Bondi, committee chair Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., followed. In her final seconds, Jayapal reiterated she believes the release of the Epstein files has been “a massive cover-up.” The Department of Justice has released millions of pages of Epstein-related documents, photographs and messages. But it missed its deadline by more than a month, and the releases have been mired by missed redactions and accusations of key omissions. Millions of pages related to the investigation into the late convicted sex offender remain inaccessible, though the White House defends its review as thorough and complete. A bipartisan group of lawmakers has demanded more transparency, accusing the government of failing to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed in November, and survivors released a Super Bowl ad telling Bondi that “it’s time for the truth.”

PBS News

17,323 views • 6 months ago

Rep. Jim Jordan says Joe Biden is interfering in the U.S. Presidential election by censoring Robert F. Kennedy Jr and indicting Donald Trump: "The White House is working to censor their primary election opponent. Now, they are going to indict their general election opponent. All while Joe Biden has classified documents at four different locations. All while Joe Biden's family took millions of dollars from foreign nationals. And then, of course, there's the comparison to how they treated Secretary Clinton. This is ridiculous what's going on, and the country understands that and sees clearly that they've been out to get Trump in 2016 when it was the Trump Russia hoax, the Crossfire Hurricane, the 2018 Bob Mueller, the 2020 impression of the Biden laptop story with the 51 intelligence officials, and now this." Robert F. Kennedy Jr Rep. Jim Jordan
3:38

Rep. Jim Jordan says Joe Biden is interfering in the U.S. Presidential election by censoring Robert F. Kennedy Jr and indicting Donald Trump: "The White House is working to censor their primary election opponent. Now, they are going to indict their general election opponent. All while Joe Biden has classified documents at four different locations. All while Joe Biden's family took millions of dollars from foreign nationals. And then, of course, there's the comparison to how they treated Secretary Clinton. This is ridiculous what's going on, and the country understands that and sees clearly that they've been out to get Trump in 2016 when it was the Trump Russia hoax, the Crossfire Hurricane, the 2018 Bob Mueller, the 2020 impression of the Biden laptop story with the 51 intelligence officials, and now this." Robert F. Kennedy Jr Rep. Jim Jordan

KanekoaTheGreat

750,262 views • 3 years ago

REPORT: House Oversight Chair James Comer says he is prepared to have Bill and Hillary Clinton ARRESTED if they keep ignoring subpoenas over their Epstein ties, and the pressure on them is now rapidly intensifying by the day. The Clintons are the only major political figures refusing to cooperate, even as Trump answers Epstein questions daily and other officials sit for depositions. Comer warns their silence will NOT be tolerated, and Washington is already showing cracks. Hakeem Jeffries refused three times to say whether it was appropriate for Democrat Stacey Plaskett to be texting Epstein during an anti-Trump hearing in 2019, and newly surfaced emails suggest Epstein helped boost Jeffries early in his rise. Meanwhile, Speaker Mike Johnson insists the files involve national security and require redactions, raising the obvious question: how can a “hoax” be a national security threat? The pressure is hitting a breaking point. If they want this story to go away, there’s only one answer: release the files and let America see everything. Watch the full report: 👇
11:20

REPORT: House Oversight Chair James Comer says he is prepared to have Bill and Hillary Clinton ARRESTED if they keep ignoring subpoenas over their Epstein ties, and the pressure on them is now rapidly intensifying by the day. The Clintons are the only major political figures refusing to cooperate, even as Trump answers Epstein questions daily and other officials sit for depositions. Comer warns their silence will NOT be tolerated, and Washington is already showing cracks. Hakeem Jeffries refused three times to say whether it was appropriate for Democrat Stacey Plaskett to be texting Epstein during an anti-Trump hearing in 2019, and newly surfaced emails suggest Epstein helped boost Jeffries early in his rise. Meanwhile, Speaker Mike Johnson insists the files involve national security and require redactions, raising the obvious question: how can a “hoax” be a national security threat? The pressure is hitting a breaking point. If they want this story to go away, there’s only one answer: release the files and let America see everything. Watch the full report: 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

97,333 views • 8 months ago

Benny Johnson talks about ‘Barack Obama’s dark ties to Jeffrey Epstein’ “Barack Obama was in on it” “Barack Obama's personal lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, White House counsel, this is arguably the most powerful lawyer in the world. She served the entire time Barack Obama was president. She was splitting her time with Jeffrey Epstein. They shared a lawyer. Kathryn Ruemmler here has emailed Jeffrey Epstein 12,000 times. In fact, she was the person who emailed Jeffrey Epstein the most. And what did she email? Jeffrey Epstein? Tee-hee-hee. Thanks for all the gifts, Jeffrey. Calling him my wonderful Jeffrey, Uncle Jeffrey. Dinner dates, travel, trips, her passport. She was made with Jeffrey Epstein. She got set up in the Rothschild's bank and then Goldman Sachs. She got set up on Wall Street by Jeffrey Epstein. She even set up Jeffrey Epstein with Barack Obama, or at least they tried. You can see at the United Nations, they were trying to make it work. Kathryn Ruemmler has resigned out of humiliation over these revelations. She said, he didn't know who Jeffrey Epstein was. Jeffrey Epstein was a convicted pedophile. This happened in 2008. That's the first year, by the way, that Barack Obama was in office. 2009, Jeffrey Epstein gets out of jail, and then he immediately becomes best friends with Kathryn Ruemmler, Barack Obama's lawyer. Here's an exchange where Jeffrey Epstein says that Catherine Rummler is a perfect lawyer for me because she's a feminist and because she's loved by Hillary Clinton and Obama. This is Jeffrey Epstein's own text message. Hillary Clinton, that's a little weird. Um, let's see, isn't she like the spirit cooking John Podesta, creepy connected to all of this? Yeah, it's that dark. Just a reminder that these people, they had these squeaky clean images of themselves. There's never been a scandal with Barack Obama. No, man, Barack Obama was in on it. It's not just Kathryn Ruemmler that was sharing with Jeffrey Epstein, his treasury secretary, Larry Summers in the documents, you can see it all laid out. The entire Obama administration, this was like Jeffrey Epstein's heyday. And if you still sitting there being like, well, Obama never went to the island or whatever, you know, we're just going to forget all this creepy personal life stuff. Ask yourself this. Why didn't Barack Obama ever prosecute Jeffrey Epstein? Why did they never have any interest in going after Epstein? It was only Trump who signed an executive order day one against human trafficking and put Jeffrey Epstein back in prison where it belonged. Just a question.”
2:54

Benny Johnson talks about ‘Barack Obama’s dark ties to Jeffrey Epstein’ “Barack Obama was in on it” “Barack Obama's personal lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, White House counsel, this is arguably the most powerful lawyer in the world. She served the entire time Barack Obama was president. She was splitting her time with Jeffrey Epstein. They shared a lawyer. Kathryn Ruemmler here has emailed Jeffrey Epstein 12,000 times. In fact, she was the person who emailed Jeffrey Epstein the most. And what did she email? Jeffrey Epstein? Tee-hee-hee. Thanks for all the gifts, Jeffrey. Calling him my wonderful Jeffrey, Uncle Jeffrey. Dinner dates, travel, trips, her passport. She was made with Jeffrey Epstein. She got set up in the Rothschild's bank and then Goldman Sachs. She got set up on Wall Street by Jeffrey Epstein. She even set up Jeffrey Epstein with Barack Obama, or at least they tried. You can see at the United Nations, they were trying to make it work. Kathryn Ruemmler has resigned out of humiliation over these revelations. She said, he didn't know who Jeffrey Epstein was. Jeffrey Epstein was a convicted pedophile. This happened in 2008. That's the first year, by the way, that Barack Obama was in office. 2009, Jeffrey Epstein gets out of jail, and then he immediately becomes best friends with Kathryn Ruemmler, Barack Obama's lawyer. Here's an exchange where Jeffrey Epstein says that Catherine Rummler is a perfect lawyer for me because she's a feminist and because she's loved by Hillary Clinton and Obama. This is Jeffrey Epstein's own text message. Hillary Clinton, that's a little weird. Um, let's see, isn't she like the spirit cooking John Podesta, creepy connected to all of this? Yeah, it's that dark. Just a reminder that these people, they had these squeaky clean images of themselves. There's never been a scandal with Barack Obama. No, man, Barack Obama was in on it. It's not just Kathryn Ruemmler that was sharing with Jeffrey Epstein, his treasury secretary, Larry Summers in the documents, you can see it all laid out. The entire Obama administration, this was like Jeffrey Epstein's heyday. And if you still sitting there being like, well, Obama never went to the island or whatever, you know, we're just going to forget all this creepy personal life stuff. Ask yourself this. Why didn't Barack Obama ever prosecute Jeffrey Epstein? Why did they never have any interest in going after Epstein? It was only Trump who signed an executive order day one against human trafficking and put Jeffrey Epstein back in prison where it belonged. Just a question.”

Wall Street Apes

66,533 views • 5 months ago

The American people were promised the truth about the Jeffrey Epstein files and the tapes the DOJ and Pam Bondi claimed existed. By refusing to release the evidence for so long, the DOJ allowed for grifters and political operatives to fester and push LIES that President Trump is engaging in a cover-up and false accusations that Trump is a pedophile. Just because someone’s name is in a “file” or they knew Epstein does NOT mean they committed a crime. Many people knew Epstein, and many people of notoriety emailed with him over the years. The best solution is for everyone whose name appears in the files to provide a transparent explanation about how they knew Epstein. We have due process in our country, and the best way people can quell conspiracies is by being fully transparent about how they knew Epstein. It isn’t a crime to know a criminal. Many people know people who commit crimes at a later time in life. That doesn’t make them a participant in the crime. But, it does create the room for conspiracies to fester when people allow wild narratives to spread without addressing them head on. A lot of people want to weaponize the Epstein files for their own personal agenda. All while distorting what the definition of a “file” is.
1:36

The American people were promised the truth about the Jeffrey Epstein files and the tapes the DOJ and Pam Bondi claimed existed. By refusing to release the evidence for so long, the DOJ allowed for grifters and political operatives to fester and push LIES that President Trump is engaging in a cover-up and false accusations that Trump is a pedophile. Just because someone’s name is in a “file” or they knew Epstein does NOT mean they committed a crime. Many people knew Epstein, and many people of notoriety emailed with him over the years. The best solution is for everyone whose name appears in the files to provide a transparent explanation about how they knew Epstein. We have due process in our country, and the best way people can quell conspiracies is by being fully transparent about how they knew Epstein. It isn’t a crime to know a criminal. Many people know people who commit crimes at a later time in life. That doesn’t make them a participant in the crime. But, it does create the room for conspiracies to fester when people allow wild narratives to spread without addressing them head on. A lot of people want to weaponize the Epstein files for their own personal agenda. All while distorting what the definition of a “file” is.

Laura Loomer

66,698 views • 6 months ago

Proof that Trump is *Not* in the Epstein Files: 🧵 First off, ask yourself this: If there was incriminating evidence against Trump in the Epstein files, would the Deep State have just kept it a secret and just watched Trump take office -- TWICE?! Please. They released the Access Hollywood tapes without flinching. The media, the DOJ, every Trump-hating institution would’ve nuked him with Epstein Tapes. They didn’t — because it’s false. Here's further proof: Trump is the one who tipped off law enforcement in Palm Beach to Epstein's sick operation. Epstein's prosecutors have praised Trump for helping them secure the conviction of Epstein in court. This is after Trump banned Epstein permanently from his clubs. Every mention of Trump's name in the Epstein victim depositions clears him completely — confirming he never set foot on Epstein’s island or private residences. No ties. No involvement. Trump has regularly called for the release of the Epstein files. Something you have never heard from Bill Clinton. The facts are there. Trump didn’t associate with Epstein, he acted against him. While others stayed silent or partied on the island, Trump helped victims, cooperated with law enforcement, and banned Epstein outright. Here's researcher and legendary author James Patterson summarizing Trump's relationship with Epstein nicely:
2:11

Proof that Trump is *Not* in the Epstein Files: 🧵 First off, ask yourself this: If there was incriminating evidence against Trump in the Epstein files, would the Deep State have just kept it a secret and just watched Trump take office -- TWICE?! Please. They released the Access Hollywood tapes without flinching. The media, the DOJ, every Trump-hating institution would’ve nuked him with Epstein Tapes. They didn’t — because it’s false. Here's further proof: Trump is the one who tipped off law enforcement in Palm Beach to Epstein's sick operation. Epstein's prosecutors have praised Trump for helping them secure the conviction of Epstein in court. This is after Trump banned Epstein permanently from his clubs. Every mention of Trump's name in the Epstein victim depositions clears him completely — confirming he never set foot on Epstein’s island or private residences. No ties. No involvement. Trump has regularly called for the release of the Epstein files. Something you have never heard from Bill Clinton. The facts are there. Trump didn’t associate with Epstein, he acted against him. While others stayed silent or partied on the island, Trump helped victims, cooperated with law enforcement, and banned Epstein outright. Here's researcher and legendary author James Patterson summarizing Trump's relationship with Epstein nicely:

Benny Johnson

438,744 views • 1 year ago

🚨SWAMP BOMBSHELL: Jeffrey Epstein was LIVE-TEXTING Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett DURING the 2019 Cohen hearing—coaching her on grilling Trump’s "Associate" Cohen about Trump's exec assistant "RONA" (Rhona Graff)!😱 Over 20,000 pages of transcripts released this week reveal that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was in direct text contact with Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI), the non-voting delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, during the February 27, 2019, House Oversight Committee hearing. There, Michael Cohen testified against then-President Donald Trump, alleging racism, financial fraud, and hush-money payments—claims Trump denies. A Washington Post analysis, matching timestamps to video, confirms Plaskett as the recipient. Epstein texted: “Cohen brought up RONA - keeper of the secrets” (referring to Trump executive assistant Rhona Graff, misspelled). Plaskett replied: “RONA??” and “Quick I’m up next is that an acronym?” In her questioning, Plaskett probed Cohen on Trump associates: “You’ve got to quickly give us as many names... She is Ms Rhona, what is Ms Rhona’s—?” Cohen confirmed: “Rhona Graff is Mr. Trump’s executive assistant… Her office is directly next to his, and she’s involved in a lot.” Epstein also texted: “Are you chewing?”—one minute after footage showed Plaskett doing so. She responded: “Not any more. Chewing interior of my mouth. Bad habit from middle school.” statement from her office, brushing them off by claiming she received texts from “staff, constituents and the public at large offering advice... including from Epstein”—an absurd equivalency treating a notorious sex trafficker like any ordinary voter. Democrats argue these, plus new emails, indicate Trump knew more about Epstein’s activities than admitted, highlighting elite ties and oversight failures.Full transparency is essential. Congress must release all documents. Full transparency is essential. Congress must release all documents.
1:34

🚨SWAMP BOMBSHELL: Jeffrey Epstein was LIVE-TEXTING Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett DURING the 2019 Cohen hearing—coaching her on grilling Trump’s "Associate" Cohen about Trump's exec assistant "RONA" (Rhona Graff)!😱 Over 20,000 pages of transcripts released this week reveal that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was in direct text contact with Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI), the non-voting delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, during the February 27, 2019, House Oversight Committee hearing. There, Michael Cohen testified against then-President Donald Trump, alleging racism, financial fraud, and hush-money payments—claims Trump denies. A Washington Post analysis, matching timestamps to video, confirms Plaskett as the recipient. Epstein texted: “Cohen brought up RONA - keeper of the secrets” (referring to Trump executive assistant Rhona Graff, misspelled). Plaskett replied: “RONA??” and “Quick I’m up next is that an acronym?” In her questioning, Plaskett probed Cohen on Trump associates: “You’ve got to quickly give us as many names... She is Ms Rhona, what is Ms Rhona’s—?” Cohen confirmed: “Rhona Graff is Mr. Trump’s executive assistant… Her office is directly next to his, and she’s involved in a lot.” Epstein also texted: “Are you chewing?”—one minute after footage showed Plaskett doing so. She responded: “Not any more. Chewing interior of my mouth. Bad habit from middle school.” statement from her office, brushing them off by claiming she received texts from “staff, constituents and the public at large offering advice... including from Epstein”—an absurd equivalency treating a notorious sex trafficker like any ordinary voter. Democrats argue these, plus new emails, indicate Trump knew more about Epstein’s activities than admitted, highlighting elite ties and oversight failures.Full transparency is essential. Congress must release all documents. Full transparency is essential. Congress must release all documents.

Project Constitution

350,298 views • 9 months ago

Lydia Moynihan on the latest Epstein files drop: “I thought there was a very interesting email between Epstein and Michael Wolff. And Michael Wolff says to Epstein, if you have anything juicy about Trump to change the narrative, this was back, I believe, in the first term, now would be the time to do it because Epstein was coming under fire.” “If Epstein had something juicy, he would have loved to change the narrative and reveal it. And I would note that all of the claims that you made in the intro, were, as you mentioned, from unverified sources. They were looked into and those complainants were deemed not credible. And there were multiple incidents with those folks involving police and psychiatric evaluations.” “So look, I think if anything, this shows that Epstein didn't have anything that d*mning where he would have released it. And again, if Biden, who his DOJ did everything they could to put him in jail for four years, if they'd had any inkling or any tidbit that was damning, I think we would know that by now.”
0:50

Lydia Moynihan on the latest Epstein files drop: “I thought there was a very interesting email between Epstein and Michael Wolff. And Michael Wolff says to Epstein, if you have anything juicy about Trump to change the narrative, this was back, I believe, in the first term, now would be the time to do it because Epstein was coming under fire.” “If Epstein had something juicy, he would have loved to change the narrative and reveal it. And I would note that all of the claims that you made in the intro, were, as you mentioned, from unverified sources. They were looked into and those complainants were deemed not credible. And there were multiple incidents with those folks involving police and psychiatric evaluations.” “So look, I think if anything, this shows that Epstein didn't have anything that d*mning where he would have released it. And again, if Biden, who his DOJ did everything they could to put him in jail for four years, if they'd had any inkling or any tidbit that was damning, I think we would know that by now.”

RedWave Press

702,192 views • 6 months ago

It's one thing for Massie and Tucker to engage in wild speculation about Epstein before an audience of millions. Ho hum. But what's really galling here is that Tucker intimates Trump had Epstein "murdered." Tucker then proceeds to misstate basic facts to support his wildly inflammatory intimation. - Contrary to what Tucker states as though it were established fact, Epstein was not "brought back" to the United States from France in July 2019. He flew back on his own accord to Teterboro airport, unaware that he'd been indicted by a Grand Jury and US marshals were waiting to arrest him. - Epstein was not "re-arrested for crimes he'd already been convicted of" in July 2019. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York expressly had to concoct a *new* set of crimes to charge Epstein with, so as to circumvent the 2007-2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement. Hence, while they charged Epstein for conduct that purportedly took place during the same period that his previous charged offenses were alleged to have taken place -- roughly 2002-2005 -- the 2019 charges included a new federal nexus, by alleging interstate crimes in New York, in addition to Florida. Epstein was federally charged with New York-based offenses for which he was never charged in 2006-2008. - Tucker seems to believe he knows for certain that Epstein was "murdered." That's possible, at least -- but if he's so unwaveringly certain of this, can he please at some point identify the evidence underlying his certainty? I realize most people do not know, and do not necessarily even need to know, these granular details, especially the legal technicalities. But if you're going to intimate that the SITTING PRESIDENT had someone murdered in prison, is it too much to ask that you first have a grasp of the basic facts? Tucker and Massie just don't care.
2:13

It's one thing for Massie and Tucker to engage in wild speculation about Epstein before an audience of millions. Ho hum. But what's really galling here is that Tucker intimates Trump had Epstein "murdered." Tucker then proceeds to misstate basic facts to support his wildly inflammatory intimation. - Contrary to what Tucker states as though it were established fact, Epstein was not "brought back" to the United States from France in July 2019. He flew back on his own accord to Teterboro airport, unaware that he'd been indicted by a Grand Jury and US marshals were waiting to arrest him. - Epstein was not "re-arrested for crimes he'd already been convicted of" in July 2019. Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York expressly had to concoct a *new* set of crimes to charge Epstein with, so as to circumvent the 2007-2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement. Hence, while they charged Epstein for conduct that purportedly took place during the same period that his previous charged offenses were alleged to have taken place -- roughly 2002-2005 -- the 2019 charges included a new federal nexus, by alleging interstate crimes in New York, in addition to Florida. Epstein was federally charged with New York-based offenses for which he was never charged in 2006-2008. - Tucker seems to believe he knows for certain that Epstein was "murdered." That's possible, at least -- but if he's so unwaveringly certain of this, can he please at some point identify the evidence underlying his certainty? I realize most people do not know, and do not necessarily even need to know, these granular details, especially the legal technicalities. But if you're going to intimate that the SITTING PRESIDENT had someone murdered in prison, is it too much to ask that you first have a grasp of the basic facts? Tucker and Massie just don't care.

Michael Tracey

47,252 views • 2 months ago