Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🔥🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL) dismantles Jack Smith MOORE: "You also issued an indictment against then-President Biden's most formidable political opponent. The candidate was President Trump." "You issued a gag order for President Trump during a 2024 election cycle. This was a major violation of President Trump's First...

ThePatriotOasis's profile picture

The Patriot Oasis™

351,579 subscribers

118,165 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔥🚨 BREAKING: HOLY CRAP! Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) absolutely BOMBS Jack Smith... Leaves him speechless... GILL: "In January of 2023, did you subpoena Kevin McCarthy's toll records?" SMITH: "We did." GILL: "How many days after Kevin Mccarthy was sworn in as speaker did you subpoena his records?" SMITH: "I don't recall but those two things had nothing to do with one another." GILL: "16 days after becoming the highest ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, you subpoenaed his toll record. Do you think it might be a violation of the debate or speech clause?" SMITH: "I do not." GILL: "At the time you secured those non-disclosure orders, was Speake McCarthy a flight risk?" SMITH: "He was not." GILL: "Why did your non-disclosure order refer to him as a flight risk. It says right here that the court finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in flight from prosecution." "I think you are using clearly in reference to speaker McCarthy, and you were using clearly false information to secure a non-disclosure order to hide from speaker McCarthy and from the American people the fact that you were spying on his toll records. I have more, so let's move on."
5:05

🔥🚨 BREAKING: HOLY CRAP! Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) absolutely BOMBS Jack Smith... Leaves him speechless... GILL: "In January of 2023, did you subpoena Kevin McCarthy's toll records?" SMITH: "We did." GILL: "How many days after Kevin Mccarthy was sworn in as speaker did you subpoena his records?" SMITH: "I don't recall but those two things had nothing to do with one another." GILL: "16 days after becoming the highest ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, you subpoenaed his toll record. Do you think it might be a violation of the debate or speech clause?" SMITH: "I do not." GILL: "At the time you secured those non-disclosure orders, was Speake McCarthy a flight risk?" SMITH: "He was not." GILL: "Why did your non-disclosure order refer to him as a flight risk. It says right here that the court finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in flight from prosecution." "I think you are using clearly in reference to speaker McCarthy, and you were using clearly false information to secure a non-disclosure order to hide from speaker McCarthy and from the American people the fact that you were spying on his toll records. I have more, so let's move on."

The Patriot Oasis™

716,271 views • 7 months ago

NEW: Senator Ted Cruz outlines the extent of the DOJ and FBI’s Arctic Frost investigation, the probe that led to Jack Smith’s election case against President Trump: "Watergate was about a handful of files in a single office." "This reached into tens of thousands of private communications, emails, records and personal data, toll records, bank records, donor lists, law firm records, and other personal files relating to every major conservative organization were subpoenaed."
0:25

NEW: Senator Ted Cruz outlines the extent of the DOJ and FBI’s Arctic Frost investigation, the probe that led to Jack Smith’s election case against President Trump: "Watergate was about a handful of files in a single office." "This reached into tens of thousands of private communications, emails, records and personal data, toll records, bank records, donor lists, law firm records, and other personal files relating to every major conservative organization were subpoenaed."

Fox News

126,354 views • 5 months ago

BREAKING: Jim Jordan reveals his phone records were targeted in the Biden DOJ’s Arctic Frost probe: "We know they spied on President Trump, then we learned it was Senators, then the Speaker of the House, and now we’ve learned they were spying on me for two and a half years, all the way back to January 2020. This is the epitome of the weaponization of government against the other party."
0:59

BREAKING: Jim Jordan reveals his phone records were targeted in the Biden DOJ’s Arctic Frost probe: "We know they spied on President Trump, then we learned it was Senators, then the Speaker of the House, and now we’ve learned they were spying on me for two and a half years, all the way back to January 2020. This is the epitome of the weaponization of government against the other party."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

271,166 views • 9 months ago

Sen. Ted Cruz torches Jack Smith after learning the DOJ tried to seize his phone records: "They issued a subpoena, and AT&T, to their credit, said no—we’re not going to hand this over. The Biden DOJ subpoenaed the phone records of nearly 20% of Republicans in the United States Senate. This was a fishing expedition and an abuse of power. By the way, they launched Arctic Frost—this witch hunt—just three days after Donald Trump announced his reelection campaign. Arctic Frost is the Biden Department of Justice’s Watergate; it is pure weaponization, going after their political opponents."
1:00

Sen. Ted Cruz torches Jack Smith after learning the DOJ tried to seize his phone records: "They issued a subpoena, and AT&T, to their credit, said no—we’re not going to hand this over. The Biden DOJ subpoenaed the phone records of nearly 20% of Republicans in the United States Senate. This was a fishing expedition and an abuse of power. By the way, they launched Arctic Frost—this witch hunt—just three days after Donald Trump announced his reelection campaign. Arctic Frost is the Biden Department of Justice’s Watergate; it is pure weaponization, going after their political opponents."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

312,073 views • 10 months ago

Famous mobster, Al Capone, was convicted of just 5 counts by the federal government. In comparison, President Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts by the corrupt state of New York. President Trump’s conviction was a political witch hunt and election interference aimed at taking down Joe Biden’s leading political opponent. They want nothing more than to stop President Trump and America First. The American people see right through this sham. 2024 will be TOO BIG TO RIG! #MAGA
0:39

Famous mobster, Al Capone, was convicted of just 5 counts by the federal government. In comparison, President Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts by the corrupt state of New York. President Trump’s conviction was a political witch hunt and election interference aimed at taking down Joe Biden’s leading political opponent. They want nothing more than to stop President Trump and America First. The American people see right through this sham. 2024 will be TOO BIG TO RIG! #MAGA

Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸

154,167 views • 2 years ago

BREAKING: Press Sec. Karoline Leavitt goes off on the Biden regime for seizing President Trump’s official government-issued phone and subpoenaing his personal phone records in the Arctic Frost investigation: “This is just further evidence of the egregious overreach and weaponization of government that took place under the previous White House against then former president and now President Donald J. Trump.” “It was a clear effort by the Biden White House and the Biden DOJ to go after the president, and this is just further evidence of that.”
0:44

BREAKING: Press Sec. Karoline Leavitt goes off on the Biden regime for seizing President Trump’s official government-issued phone and subpoenaing his personal phone records in the Arctic Frost investigation: “This is just further evidence of the egregious overreach and weaponization of government that took place under the previous White House against then former president and now President Donald J. Trump.” “It was a clear effort by the Biden White House and the Biden DOJ to go after the president, and this is just further evidence of that.”

Benny Johnson

1,164,748 views • 10 months ago

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith insists his prosecutions of President Trump weren’t politically motivated, calling the idea “ludicrous.” President Trump responded, calling Smith’s actions “criminal” and “the worst weaponization of a political opponent in history.” Subscribe to OAN LIVE for more stories like this
1:21

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith insists his prosecutions of President Trump weren’t politically motivated, calling the idea “ludicrous.” President Trump responded, calling Smith’s actions “criminal” and “the worst weaponization of a political opponent in history.” Subscribe to OAN LIVE for more stories like this

One America News

23,767 views • 10 months ago

Today, a Democrat judge issued an order gagging President Trump, destroying the First Amendment. The judge made her courtroom the Ministry of Truth. She said the case isn’t about the court of public opinion, yet she allows the media to sit in her courtroom, the very people who craft public opinion through their headlines and stories. Public opinion matters, and President Trump isn’t even able to defend himself. This entire operation is run by Joe Biden, his political opponent, and nothing more than election interference. This is the weaponization of government! If this can happen to a former President, the only question is, who’s next?
2:55

Today, a Democrat judge issued an order gagging President Trump, destroying the First Amendment. The judge made her courtroom the Ministry of Truth. She said the case isn’t about the court of public opinion, yet she allows the media to sit in her courtroom, the very people who craft public opinion through their headlines and stories. Public opinion matters, and President Trump isn’t even able to defend himself. This entire operation is run by Joe Biden, his political opponent, and nothing more than election interference. This is the weaponization of government! If this can happen to a former President, the only question is, who’s next?

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

2,132,311 views • 2 years ago

🚨🚨 BREAKING: FBI Director Kash Patel and CIA Director John Ratcliffe have just RELEASED A TROVE OF DOCUMENTS PROVING THAT THE FBI PLANTED AND TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE DURING THEIR RAID OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S MAR-A-LAGO HOME. They also knew that they didn’t have probable cause to raid his home in the first place, but the Biden administration put enormous pressure on them to raid President Trump’s home anyway. A senior Biden official was quoted as saying, “I don’t give a shit what the optics look like.” The case was all a BIG LIE - And Jack Smith and his team fabricated the entire thing. The criminal cases against President Trump were the Biden administration’s own version of Russiagate: It was a coup attempt meant to take down President Trump and prevent him from his inevitable return to The White House by illegally weaponizing the justice system against their political opponent. Each and every one of them should spend the rest of their lives in federal prison for this HIGH TREASON. God Bless Kash Patel and John Ratcliffe for EXPOSING THE TRUTH IN THESE BOMBSHELL DOCUMENTS.
1:27

🚨🚨 BREAKING: FBI Director Kash Patel and CIA Director John Ratcliffe have just RELEASED A TROVE OF DOCUMENTS PROVING THAT THE FBI PLANTED AND TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE DURING THEIR RAID OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S MAR-A-LAGO HOME. They also knew that they didn’t have probable cause to raid his home in the first place, but the Biden administration put enormous pressure on them to raid President Trump’s home anyway. A senior Biden official was quoted as saying, “I don’t give a shit what the optics look like.” The case was all a BIG LIE - And Jack Smith and his team fabricated the entire thing. The criminal cases against President Trump were the Biden administration’s own version of Russiagate: It was a coup attempt meant to take down President Trump and prevent him from his inevitable return to The White House by illegally weaponizing the justice system against their political opponent. Each and every one of them should spend the rest of their lives in federal prison for this HIGH TREASON. God Bless Kash Patel and John Ratcliffe for EXPOSING THE TRUTH IN THESE BOMBSHELL DOCUMENTS.

Joshua Hall

382,536 views • 8 months ago

I just filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice following its failure to substantively respond to my Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to uncover what White House officials including President Joe Biden communicated to Merrick Garland & Jack Smith about the unprecedented indictment in the classified documents case of a former U.S. President and one of Biden's political opponents in the 2024 Presidential election. I’m also filing a separate FOIA request with the DOJ to uncover any similar communications relating to the just-issued Jan 6 Trump indictment. We should demand accountability and transparency. In U.S. v. Alvarez, the Supreme Court held that political candidates have a First Amendment right to knowingly make inaccurate statements. If you're going to indict a former president and leading presidential candidate, it better not be based on unprecedented legal theory. Further, it's more than a stretch to call something criminal if someone is seeking legal counsel from their own lawyers. Jack Smith has created a dangerous precedent by criminalizing the behavior of Trump's lawyers who offered him legal advice, labeling them co-conspirators instead. This jeopardizes the future of our legal system. If we fail to admit the truth, Jan 6 will just be a preview of far worse to come. We must reunite this country, but the path forward will not be easy.
6:41

I just filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice following its failure to substantively respond to my Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to uncover what White House officials including President Joe Biden communicated to Merrick Garland & Jack Smith about the unprecedented indictment in the classified documents case of a former U.S. President and one of Biden's political opponents in the 2024 Presidential election. I’m also filing a separate FOIA request with the DOJ to uncover any similar communications relating to the just-issued Jan 6 Trump indictment. We should demand accountability and transparency. In U.S. v. Alvarez, the Supreme Court held that political candidates have a First Amendment right to knowingly make inaccurate statements. If you're going to indict a former president and leading presidential candidate, it better not be based on unprecedented legal theory. Further, it's more than a stretch to call something criminal if someone is seeking legal counsel from their own lawyers. Jack Smith has created a dangerous precedent by criminalizing the behavior of Trump's lawyers who offered him legal advice, labeling them co-conspirators instead. This jeopardizes the future of our legal system. If we fail to admit the truth, Jan 6 will just be a preview of far worse to come. We must reunite this country, but the path forward will not be easy.

Vivek Ramaswamy

2,188,644 views • 3 years ago

Stephanopoulos: We have never had a former president who was impeached then indicted for trying to overturn an election. We've never had a former president who lies about the election that he lost. We've never had a former president or presidential candidate who refuses to pledge to accept the results of the next election if he lost. The peaceful transfer of power is the most fundamental tenet of our democracy. Refusing to accept it is un-American and unconstitutional
0:42

Stephanopoulos: We have never had a former president who was impeached then indicted for trying to overturn an election. We've never had a former president who lies about the election that he lost. We've never had a former president or presidential candidate who refuses to pledge to accept the results of the next election if he lost. The peaceful transfer of power is the most fundamental tenet of our democracy. Refusing to accept it is un-American and unconstitutional

Headquarters

1,137,613 views • 2 years ago

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) SHOOTS down President Trump’s threat to endorse a Republican primary challenger against her: “Well, first of all, my election and my primary is settled. It is certified. There is no time for a write-in candidate, and so when the president called for a primary opponent against me, that can’t happen, and I’m going to face a Democrat in the general election. My Democrat opponent does not have a primary opponent either, so it is the two of us head-to-head for the rest of this cycle.”
2:32

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) SHOOTS down President Trump’s threat to endorse a Republican primary challenger against her: “Well, first of all, my election and my primary is settled. It is certified. There is no time for a write-in candidate, and so when the president called for a primary opponent against me, that can’t happen, and I’m going to face a Democrat in the general election. My Democrat opponent does not have a primary opponent either, so it is the two of us head-to-head for the rest of this cycle.”

RedWave Press

37,482 views • 3 months ago

Trump: You had the house raided of the ex-president of the US who actually won the election by a lot. I heard they were looking because there was a report bad about them. They thought I had it. I didn’t have anything of any merit. I had the Presidential Records Act. I had the right to have all that stuff.
1:06

Trump: You had the house raided of the ex-president of the US who actually won the election by a lot. I heard they were looking because there was a report bad about them. They thought I had it. I didn’t have anything of any merit. I had the Presidential Records Act. I had the right to have all that stuff.

Acyn

288,950 views • 10 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.
1:24

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

13,485 views • 7 months ago

Soon after President Trump announced he would run for re-election in the ‘24 cycle, Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, Fani Willis, Jack Smith and the full fury of the Left levied 91 indictments and a multimillion dollar lawsuit against him. President Donald J. Trump was targeted by the Left to stop him from winning. I truly believe none of these charges or lawsuits would have been filed had he decided not to run.
1:03

Soon after President Trump announced he would run for re-election in the ‘24 cycle, Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, Fani Willis, Jack Smith and the full fury of the Left levied 91 indictments and a multimillion dollar lawsuit against him. President Donald J. Trump was targeted by the Left to stop him from winning. I truly believe none of these charges or lawsuits would have been filed had he decided not to run.

Lindsey Graham

286,828 views • 10 months ago

Talarico: It should be troubling to all of us, regardless of our political affiliations or our political beliefs, that the most powerful people in the country, the most powerful politicians and the most powerful corporate executives are working together to sell out the first amendment, to sell out our freedom of speech in order to protect their own power and their own wealth. And that should be concerning to all of us, whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, whether you're a Progressive or Conservative, because an attack on any one of our first amendment rights is an attack on all of our first amendment rights.
1:10

Talarico: It should be troubling to all of us, regardless of our political affiliations or our political beliefs, that the most powerful people in the country, the most powerful politicians and the most powerful corporate executives are working together to sell out the first amendment, to sell out our freedom of speech in order to protect their own power and their own wealth. And that should be concerning to all of us, whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, whether you're a Progressive or Conservative, because an attack on any one of our first amendment rights is an attack on all of our first amendment rights.

Acyn

126,083 views • 6 months ago

RFK Jr. Schools CNN With Stunning Argument That Biden Is a ‘Worst Threat to Democracy’ Than Trump #1 - “President Biden is the first president in history that has used the federal agencies to censor political speech... 37 hours after he took the oath of office, he was censoring me.” #2 - “President Biden is the first president in history to use his power over the Secret Service to deny secret Service protection to one of his political opponents for political reasons.” #3 - “If you have a government that can silence its opponent, it has license for any atrocity.” CNN: “You’re saying you could make an argument that President Biden is a worse threat to democracy than Trump?” Robert F. Kennedy Jr: “Absolutely. What President in history has ever tried to censor political opponents?”
2:28

RFK Jr. Schools CNN With Stunning Argument That Biden Is a ‘Worst Threat to Democracy’ Than Trump #1 - “President Biden is the first president in history that has used the federal agencies to censor political speech... 37 hours after he took the oath of office, he was censoring me.” #2 - “President Biden is the first president in history to use his power over the Secret Service to deny secret Service protection to one of his political opponents for political reasons.” #3 - “If you have a government that can silence its opponent, it has license for any atrocity.” CNN: “You’re saying you could make an argument that President Biden is a worse threat to democracy than Trump?” Robert F. Kennedy Jr: “Absolutely. What President in history has ever tried to censor political opponents?”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,440,640 views • 2 years ago

BREAKING: "Saturday night was supposed to be a joyful evening, celebrating free speech and the First Amendment with all of you, members of the press." "Instead, the night was hijacked by a crazed anti-Trump individual who traveled across the country to assassinate the president and as many administration officials as possible." "This is the third major assassination attempt against President Trump in two years. No other president in history has faced such repeated serious attempts on his life." – Karoline Leavitt
0:31

BREAKING: "Saturday night was supposed to be a joyful evening, celebrating free speech and the First Amendment with all of you, members of the press." "Instead, the night was hijacked by a crazed anti-Trump individual who traveled across the country to assassinate the president and as many administration officials as possible." "This is the third major assassination attempt against President Trump in two years. No other president in history has faced such repeated serious attempts on his life." – Karoline Leavitt

Fox News

50,560 views • 4 months ago