Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BREAKING: Rep. Emily Randall Confronted AGAIN on NJ Illegal Alien Voters - Dodges, Then Pivots to Abortion LindellTV's Alison Steinberg pressed Sen. Emily Randall for a follow-up on the New Jersey illegal alien voter rolls story. Randall's response: call it "absurd." - Confirmed: "Folks were clearly inadvertently registered through... show more

LindellTV

110,627 subscribers

22,783 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

$🚨 BREAKING: Dem Rep. Emily Randall ADMITS ILLEGAL ALIENS VOTED - "A Very Small Fraction Voted Illegally." LindellTV's Alison Steinberg confronted Sen. Emily Randall with the number making headlines out of New Jersey - 6,600 illegal aliens were found on the voter rolls. Randall IMMEDIATELY tried to downplay it: "6,600 individuals didn't vote illegally. That's not for certain." But then backtracked?? Slightly admitting that "The proof shows that a very, very, very small fraction voted illegally" when pushed by our reporter to supply an answer. She then pivoted to attack election integrity efforts as a "poll tax" and promptly stopped answering any further questions...$

🚨 BREAKING: Dem Rep. Emily Randall ADMITS ILLEGAL ALIENS VOTED - "A Very Small Fraction Voted Illegally." LindellTV's Alison Steinberg confronted Sen. Emily Randall with the number making headlines out of New Jersey - 6,600 illegal aliens were found on the voter rolls. Randall IMMEDIATELY tried to downplay it: "6,600 individuals didn't vote illegally. That's not for certain." But then backtracked?? Slightly admitting that "The proof shows that a very, very, very small fraction voted illegally" when pushed by our reporter to supply an answer. She then pivoted to attack election integrity efforts as a "poll tax" and promptly stopped answering any further questions...

LindellTV

121,257 views • 3 days ago

🚨 NOW: After New Jersey just admitted to registering THOUSANDS of non-citizens to vote, Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon confirms NJ was one of the states concealing their voter records from the Trump administration Time for a nationwide HALT on mail-in ballots for any state hiding the rolls! Gov. Mikie Sherrill just admitted: That "thing" Democrats claim never happens, just happened over 6,600 times! 🤯 And this is just over ONE YEAR. Proof of citizenship under the SAVE America Act + voter ID is the ONLY acceptable outcome. The Senate must act now! 🇺🇸

🚨 NOW: After New Jersey just admitted to registering THOUSANDS of non-citizens to vote, Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon confirms NJ was one of the states concealing their voter records from the Trump administration Time for a nationwide HALT on mail-in ballots for any state hiding the rolls! Gov. Mikie Sherrill just admitted: That "thing" Democrats claim never happens, just happened over 6,600 times! 🤯 And this is just over ONE YEAR. Proof of citizenship under the SAVE America Act + voter ID is the ONLY acceptable outcome. The Senate must act now! 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

222,457 views • 3 days ago

🚨 DEM REP. SHRI THANEDAR ADMITS: "ONLY AMERICAN CITIZENS SHOULD VOTE." LindellTV's Alison Steinberg confronted Congressman Shri Thanedar over reports that thousands of illegal aliens were registered to vote in New Jersey, with hundreds casting ballots. Thanedar agreed that only U.S. citizens should vote and said any problems with voter registration "need to be fixed." "Only American citizens should vote in elections... Anyone that is a non-citizen must not be able to vote in our elections." When asked whether the incident strengthens the case for the SAVE Act, Thanedar rejected the proposal, calling the New Jersey case "an isolated incidence" and arguing the legislation would make it harder for some Americans to vote.

🚨 DEM REP. SHRI THANEDAR ADMITS: "ONLY AMERICAN CITIZENS SHOULD VOTE." LindellTV's Alison Steinberg confronted Congressman Shri Thanedar over reports that thousands of illegal aliens were registered to vote in New Jersey, with hundreds casting ballots. Thanedar agreed that only U.S. citizens should vote and said any problems with voter registration "need to be fixed." "Only American citizens should vote in elections... Anyone that is a non-citizen must not be able to vote in our elections." When asked whether the incident strengthens the case for the SAVE Act, Thanedar rejected the proposal, calling the New Jersey case "an isolated incidence" and arguing the legislation would make it harder for some Americans to vote.

LindellTV

54,095 views • 1 day ago

CNN’s Kasie Hunt: “The Heritage Foundation has documented a total of 25 instances of prosecution for voter fraud where citizenship was an issue. Just 25. I mean has this ever actually affected an American election?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “Well, 25 is 25 too many. It's kinda like one individual that dies from the hands of an illegal is one too many. It’s all preventable. One person voting illegally is one too many.” CNN’s Kasie Hunt: “Do you agree it doesn’t happen very much?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “No, I’m not saying it doesn’t happen very much or not. If you start looking and scrubbing some of these [voter] rolls, we see thousands of individuals that are registered to vote that have had mail-in ballots [sent] to them that are passed away.” “We see instances were 20 to 30 ballots being mailed to the same address.”

CNN’s Kasie Hunt: “The Heritage Foundation has documented a total of 25 instances of prosecution for voter fraud where citizenship was an issue. Just 25. I mean has this ever actually affected an American election?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “Well, 25 is 25 too many. It's kinda like one individual that dies from the hands of an illegal is one too many. It’s all preventable. One person voting illegally is one too many.” CNN’s Kasie Hunt: “Do you agree it doesn’t happen very much?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “No, I’m not saying it doesn’t happen very much or not. If you start looking and scrubbing some of these [voter] rolls, we see thousands of individuals that are registered to vote that have had mail-in ballots [sent] to them that are passed away.” “We see instances were 20 to 30 ballots being mailed to the same address.”

RedWave Press

165,322 views • 1 month ago

THIS ISN'T THE FIRST TIME MAXINE WATERS' TEAM HAS SILENCED OUR REPORTER House and Senate Democrats held a press conference today after President Trump declined to sign the Road to Housing Act. Maxine Waters TORE into President Donald J. Trump, calling it "America Last." LindellTV's Alison Steinberg asked her directly: How is securing our elections "America Last"? Isn't making sure only American citizens can vote the definition of America First? Before Waters could answer, her handlers stepped in, TOLD her NOT to speak with Waters, and blocked every follow-up. This is a pattern. Back in September, when Steinberg asked Waters point blank whether Democrats were demanding healthcare for illegal immigrants amid a government shutdown, Waters snapped: "Quit it. Stop it. This is the kind of journalism we don't need" - before admitting Democrats want healthcare "for everybody." Two confrontations. Two moments Democrats didn't want caught on camera. Securing election integrity isn't "America Last." It's the bare minimum of America First.

THIS ISN'T THE FIRST TIME MAXINE WATERS' TEAM HAS SILENCED OUR REPORTER House and Senate Democrats held a press conference today after President Trump declined to sign the Road to Housing Act. Maxine Waters TORE into President Donald J. Trump, calling it "America Last." LindellTV's Alison Steinberg asked her directly: How is securing our elections "America Last"? Isn't making sure only American citizens can vote the definition of America First? Before Waters could answer, her handlers stepped in, TOLD her NOT to speak with Waters, and blocked every follow-up. This is a pattern. Back in September, when Steinberg asked Waters point blank whether Democrats were demanding healthcare for illegal immigrants amid a government shutdown, Waters snapped: "Quit it. Stop it. This is the kind of journalism we don't need" - before admitting Democrats want healthcare "for everybody." Two confrontations. Two moments Democrats didn't want caught on camera. Securing election integrity isn't "America Last." It's the bare minimum of America First.

LindellTV

66,492 views • 1 month ago

OUT OF TOUCH: CNN’s Abby Phillip defends voter fraud in New Jersey in a WILD exchange with Jesse Arm and Scott Jennings. After claiming that the White House “seized on the news that New Jersey Democrats registered 6,600 noncitizens to vote, Jesse Arm & Jennings from the the top rope: Arm: “Sixty-six hundred non-citizens made it onto the voter rolls. That's to me is pretty widespread voter fraud.” Phillips: “That's widespread?” Arm: “I think, I think it'd be pretty bad if one person who's not a legal citizen of the United States [votes or is on voter roles]. (Arm was cut off by Phillips) Later, Jennings calls out Phillips for defending voter fraud: “You’re pounding him over the word ‘widespread.’ What is your tolerance for any fraud at all.” Phillips: “Is it widespread?” Jennings: “I have zero tolerance for this!”

OUT OF TOUCH: CNN’s Abby Phillip defends voter fraud in New Jersey in a WILD exchange with Jesse Arm and Scott Jennings. After claiming that the White House “seized on the news that New Jersey Democrats registered 6,600 noncitizens to vote, Jesse Arm & Jennings from the the top rope: Arm: “Sixty-six hundred non-citizens made it onto the voter rolls. That's to me is pretty widespread voter fraud.” Phillips: “That's widespread?” Arm: “I think, I think it'd be pretty bad if one person who's not a legal citizen of the United States [votes or is on voter roles]. (Arm was cut off by Phillips) Later, Jennings calls out Phillips for defending voter fraud: “You’re pounding him over the word ‘widespread.’ What is your tolerance for any fraud at all.” Phillips: “Is it widespread?” Jennings: “I have zero tolerance for this!”

Steve Guest

129,253 views • 3 days ago

“THE SAVE AMERICA ACT IS NOT SAVING AMERICA.” - TERI SEWELL DEFENDS VOTE AGAINST ELECTION SECURITY BILL Rep. Terri A. Sewell is defending her vote against the SAVE AMERICA Act, legislation designed to strengthen election integrity by requiring proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. When asked by LindellTV’s Alison Steinberg why she opposed the bill, Sewell argued that requiring identification would be too burdensome for some voters. “What the Save America Act does is it requires, in order to get a ballot, a passport or a driver's license.” She went on to claim many of her constituents do not have passports and cannot afford them, calling the legislation “unacceptable.” “The Save America Act is not saving America.” Americans are routinely required to show identification for everyday activities, yet voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements remain politically controversial. So... if voting is a “precious, almost sacred” right, why oppose measures designed to ensure that only American citizens cast ballots?

“THE SAVE AMERICA ACT IS NOT SAVING AMERICA.” - TERI SEWELL DEFENDS VOTE AGAINST ELECTION SECURITY BILL Rep. Terri A. Sewell is defending her vote against the SAVE AMERICA Act, legislation designed to strengthen election integrity by requiring proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. When asked by LindellTV’s Alison Steinberg why she opposed the bill, Sewell argued that requiring identification would be too burdensome for some voters. “What the Save America Act does is it requires, in order to get a ballot, a passport or a driver's license.” She went on to claim many of her constituents do not have passports and cannot afford them, calling the legislation “unacceptable.” “The Save America Act is not saving America.” Americans are routinely required to show identification for everyday activities, yet voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements remain politically controversial. So... if voting is a “precious, almost sacred” right, why oppose measures designed to ensure that only American citizens cast ballots?

LindellTV

19,160 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt reveals Democrat officials are now PANICKING about noncitizens on their voter rolls — a reporter just asked if the DOJ might bring PROSECUTIONS Yes! Prosecute every official allowing voter fraud! "New Jersey and this governor, the fact that she just all of a sudden decided to put out a press release saying President Trump and Republicans have been right about non-citizens on our voting rolls is not a coincidence!" "I think this governor is saying this because she realizes this administration is serious about getting to the bottom of illegal aliens voting and being on our voting rolls in our country!" "The Secretary of Homeland Security, as you know, sent a letter to several states, including New Jersey, requesting that non-citizens that are on their voter rolls need to be reported to DHS and need to be removed from those voter rolls." "So that's why all of a sudden she is speaking truth about the fact that this does take place in states across the country." "It is completely unacceptable to have non-citizens on American voter rolls voting in U.S. elections. And she says at 6,600, we suspect it's a heck of a lot more, not just in New Jersey, but in states across the country!" "The President is hell-bent on getting to the bottom of this, and it's also why we need to pass the Save America Act to ensure that only U.S. citizens are voting in U.S. elections."

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt reveals Democrat officials are now PANICKING about noncitizens on their voter rolls — a reporter just asked if the DOJ might bring PROSECUTIONS Yes! Prosecute every official allowing voter fraud! "New Jersey and this governor, the fact that she just all of a sudden decided to put out a press release saying President Trump and Republicans have been right about non-citizens on our voting rolls is not a coincidence!" "I think this governor is saying this because she realizes this administration is serious about getting to the bottom of illegal aliens voting and being on our voting rolls in our country!" "The Secretary of Homeland Security, as you know, sent a letter to several states, including New Jersey, requesting that non-citizens that are on their voter rolls need to be reported to DHS and need to be removed from those voter rolls." "So that's why all of a sudden she is speaking truth about the fact that this does take place in states across the country." "It is completely unacceptable to have non-citizens on American voter rolls voting in U.S. elections. And she says at 6,600, we suspect it's a heck of a lot more, not just in New Jersey, but in states across the country!" "The President is hell-bent on getting to the bottom of this, and it's also why we need to pass the Save America Act to ensure that only U.S. citizens are voting in U.S. elections."

Eric Daugherty

207,255 views • 1 day ago

DEMOCRATS INSIST NON-CITIZEN VOTING ISN'T HAPPENING - THEN OPPOSE PROVING IT LindellTV's Alison Steinberg asked a straightforward question: If it's already illegal for non-citizens to vote, and Democrats insist it's virtually nonexistent, why oppose stronger election safeguards? Senator Ruben Gallego's answer... "It's illegal already." He argued that military or law enforcement involvement at polling places could politicize the military and undermine public trust. Sen. Tammy Baldwin went even further, calling concerns about non-citizen voting an: "Exaggerated sort of conspiracy." Baldwin pointed to reviews in Utah and Louisiana showing "next to zero instances" of non-citizens voting and warned that additional enforcement could intimidate voters. "It's so incredibly rare." Yet Democrats continue to oppose voter ID, proof of citizenship requirements, and the SAVE America Act while insisting Americans simply trust the system. Still, the question remains. Instead of answering why stronger safeguards are a problem, they simply repeated that non-citizen voting is "rare". If it's so rare, why fight so hard against measures designed to prove it?

DEMOCRATS INSIST NON-CITIZEN VOTING ISN'T HAPPENING - THEN OPPOSE PROVING IT LindellTV's Alison Steinberg asked a straightforward question: If it's already illegal for non-citizens to vote, and Democrats insist it's virtually nonexistent, why oppose stronger election safeguards? Senator Ruben Gallego's answer... "It's illegal already." He argued that military or law enforcement involvement at polling places could politicize the military and undermine public trust. Sen. Tammy Baldwin went even further, calling concerns about non-citizen voting an: "Exaggerated sort of conspiracy." Baldwin pointed to reviews in Utah and Louisiana showing "next to zero instances" of non-citizens voting and warned that additional enforcement could intimidate voters. "It's so incredibly rare." Yet Democrats continue to oppose voter ID, proof of citizenship requirements, and the SAVE America Act while insisting Americans simply trust the system. Still, the question remains. Instead of answering why stronger safeguards are a problem, they simply repeated that non-citizen voting is "rare". If it's so rare, why fight so hard against measures designed to prove it?

LindellTV

138,464 views • 1 month ago

🚨 🚨 Chuck Schumer CONFIRMS Senate gridlock over the SAVE America Act + ADMITS TO ILLEGAL VOTERS? During a Capitol Hill gaggle, Chuck Schumer confirmed the Senate could face total gridlock over the SAVE America Act - and his response raised eyebrows. Our reporter, Alison Steinberg, asked him point-blank: is blocking voter ID, supported by roughly 85% of Americans, a betrayal of voters? Schumer erupted, "It allows ICE to kick tens of millions of people off the rolls... they don't tell them until Election Day... purging them... algorithm put together by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Government Efficiency, and Elon Musk... this is a bill that destroys the country!" Translation: Schumer's terrified because purging tens of millions means cleaning out the FRAUD - the very "voters" Dems rely on... Schumer ultimately said Democrats plan to fight the bill “tooth and nail.” Meanwhile, President Donald J. Trump has made it clear: no bills get signed until the SAVE America Act reaches his desk.

🚨 🚨 Chuck Schumer CONFIRMS Senate gridlock over the SAVE America Act + ADMITS TO ILLEGAL VOTERS? During a Capitol Hill gaggle, Chuck Schumer confirmed the Senate could face total gridlock over the SAVE America Act - and his response raised eyebrows. Our reporter, Alison Steinberg, asked him point-blank: is blocking voter ID, supported by roughly 85% of Americans, a betrayal of voters? Schumer erupted, "It allows ICE to kick tens of millions of people off the rolls... they don't tell them until Election Day... purging them... algorithm put together by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Government Efficiency, and Elon Musk... this is a bill that destroys the country!" Translation: Schumer's terrified because purging tens of millions means cleaning out the FRAUD - the very "voters" Dems rely on... Schumer ultimately said Democrats plan to fight the bill “tooth and nail.” Meanwhile, President Donald J. Trump has made it clear: no bills get signed until the SAVE America Act reaches his desk.

LindellTV

45,410 views • 4 months ago

I told you there was no “glitch.” There was never a glitch. It’s only a “glitch” because they got caught. 🚨🚨 The identity services provider (IDEMIA) used by the New Jersey DMV is pushing back against the Gov. Mikie Sherrill, saying it was the New Jersey Division of Elections—not the DMV—that registered 6,600 illegal aliens. “IDEMIA’s role is to transmit information through the motor vehicle system. The voter registration information is transmitted to the New Jersey Department of State, Division of Elections, which is ultimately responsible for verifying eligibility to vote. Information submitted by IDEMIA must still be validated and adjudicated by the Division of Elections.” This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” In other words, IDEMIA is not the agency that determines voter eligibility or approves voter registrations. Its role is to process and transmit information only. Meaning the New Jersey Division of Elections and Sedition knowingly and deliberately registered over 6,600 illegal aliens and who voted.

I told you there was no “glitch.” There was never a glitch. It’s only a “glitch” because they got caught. 🚨🚨 The identity services provider (IDEMIA) used by the New Jersey DMV is pushing back against the Gov. Mikie Sherrill, saying it was the New Jersey Division of Elections—not the DMV—that registered 6,600 illegal aliens. “IDEMIA’s role is to transmit information through the motor vehicle system. The voter registration information is transmitted to the New Jersey Department of State, Division of Elections, which is ultimately responsible for verifying eligibility to vote. Information submitted by IDEMIA must still be validated and adjudicated by the Division of Elections.” This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” In other words, IDEMIA is not the agency that determines voter eligibility or approves voter registrations. Its role is to process and transmit information only. Meaning the New Jersey Division of Elections and Sedition knowingly and deliberately registered over 6,600 illegal aliens and who voted.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

157,608 views • 2 days ago

"Let Schumer Defend Illegals Voting Over Americans" In a Capitol Hill interview with LindellTV's Alison Steinberg, Congresswoman Kat Cammack called out Senate leadership for refusing to advance the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship and voter ID to vote. Cammack blasted the so-called zombie filibuster that allows Democrats to quietly block bills without even showing up and urged the GOP to enforce the talking filibuster already on the books. “I’d love nothing more than Chuck Schumer to stand up and defend the rights of illegals over American citizens.” Cammack said the failure to attach the SAVE Act to the last funding package was a missed opportunity, but the fight isn’t over. “This isn’t a waste of time. What’s a waste of time is doing nothing, then watching Democrats win and move to impeach President Trump again.” She called on voters to demand a response from their senators and keep the pressure on. “This is common sense. It’s not controversial. And it’s what the American people expect us to do.”

"Let Schumer Defend Illegals Voting Over Americans" In a Capitol Hill interview with LindellTV's Alison Steinberg, Congresswoman Kat Cammack called out Senate leadership for refusing to advance the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship and voter ID to vote. Cammack blasted the so-called zombie filibuster that allows Democrats to quietly block bills without even showing up and urged the GOP to enforce the talking filibuster already on the books. “I’d love nothing more than Chuck Schumer to stand up and defend the rights of illegals over American citizens.” Cammack said the failure to attach the SAVE Act to the last funding package was a missed opportunity, but the fight isn’t over. “This isn’t a waste of time. What’s a waste of time is doing nothing, then watching Democrats win and move to impeach President Trump again.” She called on voters to demand a response from their senators and keep the pressure on. “This is common sense. It’s not controversial. And it’s what the American people expect us to do.”

LindellTV

32,889 views • 5 months ago

Here it is: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker and a serial domestic abuser, DOGE CONFIRMS: CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE: The illegal alien industry; Illegal aliens were issued Social Security numbers by the Biden–Harris terrorist administration. • 270,425 in 2021 • 590,193 in 2022 • 964,163 in 2023 • 2,095,247 in 2024 — on it’s way out the door. With 1.4 million illegal aliens on Medicaid. And Millions received driver's licences, registered to vote, and have already voted. Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

Here it is: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker and a serial domestic abuser, DOGE CONFIRMS: CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE: The illegal alien industry; Illegal aliens were issued Social Security numbers by the Biden–Harris terrorist administration. • 270,425 in 2021 • 590,193 in 2022 • 964,163 in 2023 • 2,095,247 in 2024 — on it’s way out the door. With 1.4 million illegal aliens on Medicaid. And Millions received driver's licences, registered to vote, and have already voted. Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

44,926 views • 6 months ago

The View falsely claims the SAVE Act is about keeping everyone from voting and downplay the 400 illegal votes in New Jersey as not a big deal: SARA HAINES: But 90 percent of U.S. citizens have some form of I.D. Whereas, only about half of Americans have passports so this actually is. JOY BEHAR: Or pastaports. HAINES: Yeah. That means it is reducing the voting public. You're making it harder when the percentages at the polls are already, i think, too low for this country, and what a vote means. BEHAR: So they really don't want us to vote, is the point. HAINES: Some of us. [Crosstalk] SUNNY HOSTIN: I do think we need to acknowledge and recognize that 6,600 noncitizens registered to vote is a problem. HAINES: Yes. HOSTIN: Right. I think we should recognize that. I think that's appropriate, 400 noncitizens went on to cast ballots. That's problematic. However, to call it widespread voter fraud is just absolutely misleading. It's absolutely ridiculous because if you look at the last election that Mikie Sherrill did win, it would amount -- 400 ineligible votes would amount to 0.01 of a percent of all votes cast. Okay? So there's no widespread voter fraud. But I will say this: comparing our vote to a pasta card, like voting rights are foundational in a functional democracy. Pasta purchases are not, and so - ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I beg to differ. ANA NAVARRO: Honey, they're just throwing spaghetti at the wall. HOSTIN: Correct. Nice one. I see what you did there. It's absurd.

The View falsely claims the SAVE Act is about keeping everyone from voting and downplay the 400 illegal votes in New Jersey as not a big deal: SARA HAINES: But 90 percent of U.S. citizens have some form of I.D. Whereas, only about half of Americans have passports so this actually is. JOY BEHAR: Or pastaports. HAINES: Yeah. That means it is reducing the voting public. You're making it harder when the percentages at the polls are already, i think, too low for this country, and what a vote means. BEHAR: So they really don't want us to vote, is the point. HAINES: Some of us. [Crosstalk] SUNNY HOSTIN: I do think we need to acknowledge and recognize that 6,600 noncitizens registered to vote is a problem. HAINES: Yes. HOSTIN: Right. I think we should recognize that. I think that's appropriate, 400 noncitizens went on to cast ballots. That's problematic. However, to call it widespread voter fraud is just absolutely misleading. It's absolutely ridiculous because if you look at the last election that Mikie Sherrill did win, it would amount -- 400 ineligible votes would amount to 0.01 of a percent of all votes cast. Okay? So there's no widespread voter fraud. But I will say this: comparing our vote to a pasta card, like voting rights are foundational in a functional democracy. Pasta purchases are not, and so - ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I beg to differ. ANA NAVARRO: Honey, they're just throwing spaghetti at the wall. HOSTIN: Correct. Nice one. I see what you did there. It's absurd.

Nicholas Fondacaro

15,758 views • 19 hours ago

Raphael Warnock is back at it again, and PBS was far too eager to carry water for his big lie. Secure elections are NOT Jim Crow. They’re NOT racist. They’re NOT segregationist. And they’re certainly NOT oppression. They’re about preserving the integrity of our republic. The SAVE America Act is designed to ensure that American citizens are voting in American elections. That should NOT be controversial. In fact, we should require identification for every voter. Voting is one of the most important civic responsibilities a citizen can perform. If a government-issued photo ID is required to open a bank account, board an airplane, or purchase alcohol, then requiring identification to vote is hardly an unreasonable standard. So why are so many working so hard to stop it from reaching the President’s desk?

Raphael Warnock is back at it again, and PBS was far too eager to carry water for his big lie. Secure elections are NOT Jim Crow. They’re NOT racist. They’re NOT segregationist. And they’re certainly NOT oppression. They’re about preserving the integrity of our republic. The SAVE America Act is designed to ensure that American citizens are voting in American elections. That should NOT be controversial. In fact, we should require identification for every voter. Voting is one of the most important civic responsibilities a citizen can perform. If a government-issued photo ID is required to open a bank account, board an airplane, or purchase alcohol, then requiring identification to vote is hardly an unreasonable standard. So why are so many working so hard to stop it from reaching the President’s desk?

Wesley Hunt

28,147 views • 1 month ago

INDEPENDENT VOTER: "I will never in my lifetime vote for a Democrat again!" Democrats lost the poor vote. They lost the minority vote. So they flooded the borders with people from other countries to vote for them. They are fighting the SAVE AMERICA ACT because it requires proof of citizenship and photo ID to vote in federal elections. No more illegals on the rolls. They want to strip funding for ICE so nobody stops the invasion. Keep the borders wide open and the new voters coming. This woman woke up and saw the game plain as day. Millions more are doing the same. Democrats turned on American workers to import their own electorate. Trump is pushing the SAVE AMERICA ACT hard. Time to pass it and lock down our elections before they rig the next one too. No more replacement. America First.

INDEPENDENT VOTER: "I will never in my lifetime vote for a Democrat again!" Democrats lost the poor vote. They lost the minority vote. So they flooded the borders with people from other countries to vote for them. They are fighting the SAVE AMERICA ACT because it requires proof of citizenship and photo ID to vote in federal elections. No more illegals on the rolls. They want to strip funding for ICE so nobody stops the invasion. Keep the borders wide open and the new voters coming. This woman woke up and saw the game plain as day. Millions more are doing the same. Democrats turned on American workers to import their own electorate. Trump is pushing the SAVE AMERICA ACT hard. Time to pass it and lock down our elections before they rig the next one too. No more replacement. America First.

Bill Mitchell

17,386 views • 3 months ago

Here it is: YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker, a serial domestic abuser, a child predator, and an illegal alien. And now the Democrats are saying, “No, it’s not Elon Musk . No illegal granted parole, a work visa, or a social security number can vote.” ⸻——— DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about five million of them who came into the country illegally were given various forms of parole around the country and they got through automatic system Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” ⸻ 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election, when Democrats said, “2020 was the most secure election in U.S. history,” even as they stopped counting so that, in the darkness of night, they could overthrow the U.S. government.

Here it is: YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker, a serial domestic abuser, a child predator, and an illegal alien. And now the Democrats are saying, “No, it’s not Elon Musk . No illegal granted parole, a work visa, or a social security number can vote.” ⸻——— DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about five million of them who came into the country illegally were given various forms of parole around the country and they got through automatic system Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” ⸻ 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election, when Democrats said, “2020 was the most secure election in U.S. history,” even as they stopped counting so that, in the darkness of night, they could overthrow the U.S. government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

104,022 views • 7 months ago

WOAH 🚨 American ‘Mvtsu Matsu’ says his dad was mailed a mail in ballot by California IN GEORGIA “My dad, who hasn't lived in California for 16 years, received a ballot sent to his Georgia address? Not forwarded, but sent to his Georgia address” A new lawsuit by Judicial Watch explains why. They are suing the state of California for having 873,000 ghost voters in California That's hundreds of thousands of people, inactive voters, on California's voter rolls “Remember, my dad is not the only one that has experienced this. So many other people — in my comment section, on other social media platforms. So many people have gotten either multiple ballots, they've gotten ballots for themselves differentiating between their maiden name and their married name. People have gotten ballots for their children when they've never even registered to vote in the state itself” This is accurate, A federal lawsuit was filed on May 28, 2026 by Judicial Watch 873,092 inactive voter registrations that have remained on the rolls Some of those have continuously been inactive through at least 2 and up to 5 or more federal general elections Judicial Watch describes these as “ghost voters” or “dirty names,” arguing many likely belong to people who have moved out of state, died, or otherwise become ineligible Democrats use these to ballot harvest, I guarantee it Democrats are rigging our elections with mail in ballots, ban them

WOAH 🚨 American ‘Mvtsu Matsu’ says his dad was mailed a mail in ballot by California IN GEORGIA “My dad, who hasn't lived in California for 16 years, received a ballot sent to his Georgia address? Not forwarded, but sent to his Georgia address” A new lawsuit by Judicial Watch explains why. They are suing the state of California for having 873,000 ghost voters in California That's hundreds of thousands of people, inactive voters, on California's voter rolls “Remember, my dad is not the only one that has experienced this. So many other people — in my comment section, on other social media platforms. So many people have gotten either multiple ballots, they've gotten ballots for themselves differentiating between their maiden name and their married name. People have gotten ballots for their children when they've never even registered to vote in the state itself” This is accurate, A federal lawsuit was filed on May 28, 2026 by Judicial Watch 873,092 inactive voter registrations that have remained on the rolls Some of those have continuously been inactive through at least 2 and up to 5 or more federal general elections Judicial Watch describes these as “ghost voters” or “dirty names,” arguing many likely belong to people who have moved out of state, died, or otherwise become ineligible Democrats use these to ballot harvest, I guarantee it Democrats are rigging our elections with mail in ballots, ban them

Wall Street Apes

153,166 views • 1 month ago

Last night, I went to the Senate floor to refute Democrat lies about the SAVE America Act. This vital legislation requires proof of citizenship to register for federal elections. It requires photo identification when casting a ballot. Nothing radical. Nothing extraordinary. Nothing that millions of Americans don't already do to board an airplane, cash a check, enter a federal building, purchase certain medications, or pick up tickets at will-call. "Noncitizen voting is already illegal." Exactly. Robbery is illegal. We still lock the bank. Identity theft is illegal. We still verify identities. Fraud is illegal. We still investigate fraud. No serious person believes that declaring something illegal eliminates the need to enforce the law. The SAVE America Act enforces the law. And the American people overwhelmingly want our laws enforced. Last Thursday, President Trump declassified reports detailing how vulnerable our elections have become. Our own intelligence community concluded that foreign adversaries like China and even non-state actors possess the capability to compromise American election infrastructure. The assessments specifically identify voter registration databases, electronic poll books, and election websites as the most vulnerable targets. According to the White House, Communist China acquired approximately 220 million American voter files. Names. Addresses. Phone numbers. Political affiliations. Enough information to build detailed profiles of nearly every American voter. If China hacked the personnel files of the Pentagon, this chamber would be in an uproar. If China stole the banking information of 220 million Americans, Congress would cancel its recess. But somehow we're expected to shrug when the target is the American voter. The House has acted. The President has called upon us to act. The American people are begging us to act. The only thing standing in the way is the Senate. We’ve been told there simply isn’t enough time to debate the SAVE America Act until it passes. But there is no law that we all need to take summer vacations. We don’t have a lack of time; we have a lack of spine. The American people are watching. They know this is not about Republicans. Not about Democrats. It isn't about the last election. It isn’t even about 2026. It's about every election yet to come, for generations, and whether Americans can trust them. American elections belong to American citizens. We should make it easy to vote, and hard to cheat. We should pass the SAVE America Act.

Last night, I went to the Senate floor to refute Democrat lies about the SAVE America Act. This vital legislation requires proof of citizenship to register for federal elections. It requires photo identification when casting a ballot. Nothing radical. Nothing extraordinary. Nothing that millions of Americans don't already do to board an airplane, cash a check, enter a federal building, purchase certain medications, or pick up tickets at will-call. "Noncitizen voting is already illegal." Exactly. Robbery is illegal. We still lock the bank. Identity theft is illegal. We still verify identities. Fraud is illegal. We still investigate fraud. No serious person believes that declaring something illegal eliminates the need to enforce the law. The SAVE America Act enforces the law. And the American people overwhelmingly want our laws enforced. Last Thursday, President Trump declassified reports detailing how vulnerable our elections have become. Our own intelligence community concluded that foreign adversaries like China and even non-state actors possess the capability to compromise American election infrastructure. The assessments specifically identify voter registration databases, electronic poll books, and election websites as the most vulnerable targets. According to the White House, Communist China acquired approximately 220 million American voter files. Names. Addresses. Phone numbers. Political affiliations. Enough information to build detailed profiles of nearly every American voter. If China hacked the personnel files of the Pentagon, this chamber would be in an uproar. If China stole the banking information of 220 million Americans, Congress would cancel its recess. But somehow we're expected to shrug when the target is the American voter. The House has acted. The President has called upon us to act. The American people are begging us to act. The only thing standing in the way is the Senate. We’ve been told there simply isn’t enough time to debate the SAVE America Act until it passes. But there is no law that we all need to take summer vacations. We don’t have a lack of time; we have a lack of spine. The American people are watching. They know this is not about Republicans. Not about Democrats. It isn't about the last election. It isn’t even about 2026. It's about every election yet to come, for generations, and whether Americans can trust them. American elections belong to American citizens. We should make it easy to vote, and hard to cheat. We should pass the SAVE America Act.

Mike Lee

44,804 views • 3 days ago

Can We Now Talk About Voter Fraud, Or Is That Still Forbidden? | David Strom, HotAir Soon enough, after the Democrats mostly give up on defending the most obvious welfare fraud in Minnesota and elsewhere, we will see them pivot to "it's isolated and rare." In fact, many of the Democrats and their Pravda propagandists have already half-pivoted, still claiming that the fraud is actually small, and that there is no systemic problem. It's a few bad apples, and be afraid of white men anyway. They are racists and xenophobes, right? But the fact is that this, and no doubt many other states, are organized around the perpetration of many frauds—the pillaging of billions of dollars from taxpayers, in much the same way that USAID was, and with many of the same propaganda techniques. "Think of the children!" But you don't get 50% or more of all Medicaid funds being disbursed fraudulently without it being what amounts to organized crime, and crime that has at least the implicit, and often explicit support of high-level government officials. They designed and implemented the programs to facilitate fraud. Well, folks, I have news for you. The same is true for our election system. In places like Minnesota, there are precisely zero checks on the validity of votes, and relatively few on the security of the ballots. We don't check IDs; people can vouch for the legality of up to 8 people each. Mail-in ballots have no checks on their validity. Votes get counted without signatures, and they not only never clean up the voter rolls but also actively fight against legally required efforts to do so. Most people don't know this, but in order to facilitate illegal immigration, you can now get a driver's license with no identification at all. You can vote with no evidence that you live in the precinct. A volunteer can waltz in with 8 "voters" who speak no English, have their faces covered, and have no evidence of citizenship or even residency in the precinct and "vouch" for them. In the last election, when my wife and I went to vote, a man walked out with us and begged for bus fare to get back home on the other side of the city. You can't make it up. Democrats often point to the relative paucity of "evidence" that voter fraud is happening (there is much more than the media tells you), but the fact is that the system is designed not to collect any evidence at all. A few years back, a ballot security activist tracked down the "residences" of suspicious voters and found that many of the addresses reported either didn't exist or were businesses. Homeless shelters often have hundreds of registered voters at their location, despite having capacities in the tens. The system is designed to create fraud, almost exclusively in the urban areas where the Democrats control the entire chain from registration to counting. Nursing homes are a great place to commit fraud, since one person there can vouch for the identity of every single resident, and I personally know that one person will sign the voter book for everybody there because I have seen it with my own eyes during the Norm Coleman recount. When I pointed out that the signatures were all in the same handwriting, the county auditor just said, "Oh, that's OK, it's a nursing home." For God's sake. Tens of votes decided the election. Who knows how many were fraudulent? We've all seen the videos of people stuffing ballot boxes. Yes, there were "mules" who collected ballots and delivered them in the middle of the night. You would think that people would understand the transitive property of fraud—if you see it rampant in one area, you should suspect it elsewhere when the same people are involved. Do you think that they scammed you over here but wouldn't DARE over there, especially since winning those elections makes their profitable fraud possible? How stupid or blind can you be? Minnesota's Attorney General bragged on Somali TV that he would not be the Attorney General without the votes of Somalis—the very Somalis he helped scam the taxpayers to the tune of $10 billion or more. Do you think he is vigorously investigating voter fraud?

Can We Now Talk About Voter Fraud, Or Is That Still Forbidden? | David Strom, HotAir Soon enough, after the Democrats mostly give up on defending the most obvious welfare fraud in Minnesota and elsewhere, we will see them pivot to "it's isolated and rare." In fact, many of the Democrats and their Pravda propagandists have already half-pivoted, still claiming that the fraud is actually small, and that there is no systemic problem. It's a few bad apples, and be afraid of white men anyway. They are racists and xenophobes, right? But the fact is that this, and no doubt many other states, are organized around the perpetration of many frauds—the pillaging of billions of dollars from taxpayers, in much the same way that USAID was, and with many of the same propaganda techniques. "Think of the children!" But you don't get 50% or more of all Medicaid funds being disbursed fraudulently without it being what amounts to organized crime, and crime that has at least the implicit, and often explicit support of high-level government officials. They designed and implemented the programs to facilitate fraud. Well, folks, I have news for you. The same is true for our election system. In places like Minnesota, there are precisely zero checks on the validity of votes, and relatively few on the security of the ballots. We don't check IDs; people can vouch for the legality of up to 8 people each. Mail-in ballots have no checks on their validity. Votes get counted without signatures, and they not only never clean up the voter rolls but also actively fight against legally required efforts to do so. Most people don't know this, but in order to facilitate illegal immigration, you can now get a driver's license with no identification at all. You can vote with no evidence that you live in the precinct. A volunteer can waltz in with 8 "voters" who speak no English, have their faces covered, and have no evidence of citizenship or even residency in the precinct and "vouch" for them. In the last election, when my wife and I went to vote, a man walked out with us and begged for bus fare to get back home on the other side of the city. You can't make it up. Democrats often point to the relative paucity of "evidence" that voter fraud is happening (there is much more than the media tells you), but the fact is that the system is designed not to collect any evidence at all. A few years back, a ballot security activist tracked down the "residences" of suspicious voters and found that many of the addresses reported either didn't exist or were businesses. Homeless shelters often have hundreds of registered voters at their location, despite having capacities in the tens. The system is designed to create fraud, almost exclusively in the urban areas where the Democrats control the entire chain from registration to counting. Nursing homes are a great place to commit fraud, since one person there can vouch for the identity of every single resident, and I personally know that one person will sign the voter book for everybody there because I have seen it with my own eyes during the Norm Coleman recount. When I pointed out that the signatures were all in the same handwriting, the county auditor just said, "Oh, that's OK, it's a nursing home." For God's sake. Tens of votes decided the election. Who knows how many were fraudulent? We've all seen the videos of people stuffing ballot boxes. Yes, there were "mules" who collected ballots and delivered them in the middle of the night. You would think that people would understand the transitive property of fraud—if you see it rampant in one area, you should suspect it elsewhere when the same people are involved. Do you think that they scammed you over here but wouldn't DARE over there, especially since winning those elections makes their profitable fraud possible? How stupid or blind can you be? Minnesota's Attorney General bragged on Somali TV that he would not be the Attorney General without the votes of Somalis—the very Somalis he helped scam the taxpayers to the tune of $10 billion or more. Do you think he is vigorously investigating voter fraud?

Owen Gregorian

90,673 views • 6 months ago