Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Marco Rubio EVISCERATES reports that the US only struck Iran because Israel forced us to "If you're gonna play my statement, play the WHOLE statement! Not CLIP it to reach a narrative you want, OK?" "This was a question of timing as a joint operation, NOT... show more

Eric Daugherty

1,160,569 subscribers

92,751 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

Curtis Houck

15,505 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday walked back his comments that the United States attacked Iran because of Israel, saying the U.S. strikes "had to happen anyway." "The president made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks," Rubio told reporters on Tuesday. "This was a question of timing of why this had to happen as a joint operation," he added. "Not the question of the intent." On Monday, Rubio said the U.S. "proactively" hit Iran "in a defensive way" to prevent American casualties because the Trump administration believed an Israeli attack was imminent and that Iran "would immediately come after us" in retaliation. "Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it, but this had to happen no matter what," he said Monday.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday walked back his comments that the United States attacked Iran because of Israel, saying the U.S. strikes "had to happen anyway." "The president made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks," Rubio told reporters on Tuesday. "This was a question of timing of why this had to happen as a joint operation," he added. "Not the question of the intent." On Monday, Rubio said the U.S. "proactively" hit Iran "in a defensive way" to prevent American casualties because the Trump administration believed an Israeli attack was imminent and that Iran "would immediately come after us" in retaliation. "Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it, but this had to happen no matter what," he said Monday.

PBS News

13,865 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨Watch Tucker Carlson TWISTS Trump and Rubio’s statements to sell his Iran narrative - PURE PROPAGANDA: What Tucker claims Trump said on camera: “We’re thinking about using nukes against Iran. The president of the United States just said out loud that if this gets more intense, we could nuke them.” What Trump actually said when asked what more militarily needs to be done in Iran was “more of the same,” and that he is “leaving certain things.” He did not say he was “thinking about using nukes,” as Tucker claimed. Full quote from Trump: “More of the same. And we'll see how that all comes out. They've lost their navy. They've lost their air force. They have no anti-air force apparatus at all. They have no radar. Their leaders are gone. And we can do a lot worse. We're leaving certain things. That if we take them out, we take them out by this afternoon. In fact, within an hour. They'd literally never be able to build their country back.” Tucker went on to say that “there's been very little interest in convincing you we did this in America's national interests,” claiming Secretary of State Marco Rubio “came out and said Israel forced our hand.” This narrative has already been shot down by Rubio himself, who said he was taken out of context and that Trump made the decision to strike Iran after negotiations fell through. Rubio, when asked about claims that he told the press the U.S. got involved because Israel was going to strike Iran, said: “No. Yeah, your statement is false. I told you this had to happen anyway. The president made a decision. And the decision was that Iran wouldn’t be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program. That Iran was not going to be able to hide behind the ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The president made a decision to systematically destroy this terroristic capability that they had, and that we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing - of why this had to happen as a joint operation - not a question of intent. Once the president made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us in the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statements - not clip them to reach a narrative you want to do.” That last sentence could explicitly apply to Tucker Carlson.

🚨Watch Tucker Carlson TWISTS Trump and Rubio’s statements to sell his Iran narrative - PURE PROPAGANDA: What Tucker claims Trump said on camera: “We’re thinking about using nukes against Iran. The president of the United States just said out loud that if this gets more intense, we could nuke them.” What Trump actually said when asked what more militarily needs to be done in Iran was “more of the same,” and that he is “leaving certain things.” He did not say he was “thinking about using nukes,” as Tucker claimed. Full quote from Trump: “More of the same. And we'll see how that all comes out. They've lost their navy. They've lost their air force. They have no anti-air force apparatus at all. They have no radar. Their leaders are gone. And we can do a lot worse. We're leaving certain things. That if we take them out, we take them out by this afternoon. In fact, within an hour. They'd literally never be able to build their country back.” Tucker went on to say that “there's been very little interest in convincing you we did this in America's national interests,” claiming Secretary of State Marco Rubio “came out and said Israel forced our hand.” This narrative has already been shot down by Rubio himself, who said he was taken out of context and that Trump made the decision to strike Iran after negotiations fell through. Rubio, when asked about claims that he told the press the U.S. got involved because Israel was going to strike Iran, said: “No. Yeah, your statement is false. I told you this had to happen anyway. The president made a decision. And the decision was that Iran wouldn’t be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program. That Iran was not going to be able to hide behind the ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The president made a decision to systematically destroy this terroristic capability that they had, and that we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing - of why this had to happen as a joint operation - not a question of intent. Once the president made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us in the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statements - not clip them to reach a narrative you want to do.” That last sentence could explicitly apply to Tucker Carlson.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

54,366 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

SECRETARY RUBIO: Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them.

SECRETARY RUBIO: Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them.

Department of State

64,062 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"The war was launched this weekend, not because there was a breakdown in the negotiations, rather because there was a breakthrough in the negotiations." Al Jazeera's Marwan on the joint attack by Israel and the US on Iran.

"The war was launched this weekend, not because there was a breakdown in the negotiations, rather because there was a breakthrough in the negotiations." Al Jazeera's Marwan on the joint attack by Israel and the US on Iran.

Al Jazeera English

510,921 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#WATCH | On the resignation of Joseph Kent, Director of the National Counterterrorism Centre, US President Donald Trump says, "I always thought he was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security. But when I read his statement, I realised that it's a good thing that he's out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat. Every country realised what a threat Iran was..." (Source: The White House)

#WATCH | On the resignation of Joseph Kent, Director of the National Counterterrorism Centre, US President Donald Trump says, "I always thought he was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security. But when I read his statement, I realised that it's a good thing that he's out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat. Every country realised what a threat Iran was..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

28,123 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "Somebody asked me a question yesterday, 'Did we go in because of Israel?' and I said, 'No.' I told you this had to happen anyway. I told you this had to happen anyway. President Donald J. Trump made a decision — and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program."

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "Somebody asked me a question yesterday, 'Did we go in because of Israel?' and I said, 'No.' I told you this had to happen anyway. I told you this had to happen anyway. President Donald J. Trump made a decision — and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program."

Rapid Response 47

258,731 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

HOW THE INTERNET TOOK Secretary Marco Rubio OUT OF CONTEXT - making it seem like he said Israel was responsible for America’s involvement in Iran. A viral clip led many people to believe Marco Rubio said yesterday that Israel forced America’s hand in its operation in Iran. However, the added context left out of the clip shows Rubio clarifying minutes later that he was explaining why the operation happened at that specific time and why it was conducted jointly with Israel. He also made clear that action against Iran had already been agreed upon independently of Israel’s actions. As Rubio pointed out today, this context was left out so people could "reach a narrative."

HOW THE INTERNET TOOK Secretary Marco Rubio OUT OF CONTEXT - making it seem like he said Israel was responsible for America’s involvement in Iran. A viral clip led many people to believe Marco Rubio said yesterday that Israel forced America’s hand in its operation in Iran. However, the added context left out of the clip shows Rubio clarifying minutes later that he was explaining why the operation happened at that specific time and why it was conducted jointly with Israel. He also made clear that action against Iran had already been agreed upon independently of Israel’s actions. As Rubio pointed out today, this context was left out so people could "reach a narrative."

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

30,030 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BREAKING: Marco Rubio just UNLEASHED on the fake news after a reporter tried to bring up an OUT OF CONTEXT claim about what he said yesterday: "You're statement is FALSE." "Did we go in because of Israel? I said no. I told you this had to happen anyway. The president made a decision and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its missile program. They would not be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The president systematically made a decision to destroy this terroristic capability that they had and we carry that out. I was very clear on that answer." DESTROYED.

BREAKING: Marco Rubio just UNLEASHED on the fake news after a reporter tried to bring up an OUT OF CONTEXT claim about what he said yesterday: "You're statement is FALSE." "Did we go in because of Israel? I said no. I told you this had to happen anyway. The president made a decision and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its missile program. They would not be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The president systematically made a decision to destroy this terroristic capability that they had and we carry that out. I was very clear on that answer." DESTROYED.

Gunther Eagleman™

30,355 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

President Trump said that he did not want to extend a rapidly expiring ceasefire in the US-Israeli war on Iran and that the US military was ‘raring to go’ if negotiations were not successful

President Trump said that he did not want to extend a rapidly expiring ceasefire in the US-Israeli war on Iran and that the US military was ‘raring to go’ if negotiations were not successful

Reuters

65,399 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Iran’s deputy foreign minister: “Iran was on the verge of responding to Israel’s ceasefire violation last night. Then Pakistan intervened and conveyed messages regarding US controlling Israel and stopping it”. WRONG. Israel control the US. The US does not control Israel. Noam Chomsky who was a Mossad agent, told Jeffrey Epstein that he convinced Nasrallah and Iran that the US controls Israel. It was a poisoned pill. The last time Iran was promised that the US would control Israel and that a ceasefire was coming was just before Sayed Nasrallah was assassinated.

Iran’s deputy foreign minister: “Iran was on the verge of responding to Israel’s ceasefire violation last night. Then Pakistan intervened and conveyed messages regarding US controlling Israel and stopping it”. WRONG. Israel control the US. The US does not control Israel. Noam Chomsky who was a Mossad agent, told Jeffrey Epstein that he convinced Nasrallah and Iran that the US controls Israel. It was a poisoned pill. The last time Iran was promised that the US would control Israel and that a ceasefire was coming was just before Sayed Nasrallah was assassinated.

Syrian Girl

37,205 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Marco Rubio, referring to Iran as a "revolutionary movement that exports terror" and "not a country" says that Iran should not be a part of the Israel-Lebanon negotiations, only Israel and Lebanon.

Marco Rubio, referring to Iran as a "revolutionary movement that exports terror" and "not a country" says that Iran should not be a part of the Israel-Lebanon negotiations, only Israel and Lebanon.

Uri Kurlianchik

25,975 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

REPORTER: Yesterday you told us Israel was going to strike Iran and that's why we needed to get involved. But today the president said Iran-- RUBIO: No. Were you there yesterday? REPORTER: Yes. I asked the question

REPORTER: Yesterday you told us Israel was going to strike Iran and that's why we needed to get involved. But today the president said Iran-- RUBIO: No. Were you there yesterday? REPORTER: Yes. I asked the question

Aaron Rupar

4,410,915 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Question: "Was the US forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action?" Secretary Marco Rubio: "No... No matter what, ultimately, this operation needed to happen — that's the question of 'why now?' But this operation needed to happen because Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it because they could hold the whole world hostage. Look at the damage they're doing now — and this is a weakened Iran. Imagine a year from now. So, that had to happen. Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it — but this had to happen no matter what."

Question: "Was the US forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action?" Secretary Marco Rubio: "No... No matter what, ultimately, this operation needed to happen — that's the question of 'why now?' But this operation needed to happen because Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it because they could hold the whole world hostage. Look at the damage they're doing now — and this is a weakened Iran. Imagine a year from now. So, that had to happen. Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it — but this had to happen no matter what."

Mossad Commentary

20,425 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"Was the US forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action?" Secretary Marco Rubio: "No... No matter what, ultimately, this operation needed to happen — that's the question of 'why now?' But this operation needed to happen because Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it because they could hold the whole world hostage. Look at the damage they're doing now — and this is a weakened Iran. Imagine a year from now. So, that had to happen. Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it — but this had to happen no matter what."

"Was the US forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action?" Secretary Marco Rubio: "No... No matter what, ultimately, this operation needed to happen — that's the question of 'why now?' But this operation needed to happen because Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it because they could hold the whole world hostage. Look at the damage they're doing now — and this is a weakened Iran. Imagine a year from now. So, that had to happen. Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it — but this had to happen no matter what."

Rapid Response 47

979,951 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Piers Morgan drops a massive bombshell: Marco Rubio was caught on camera admitting the US launched a preemptive strike on Iran ONLY because Israel was about to attack. Netanyahu completely played Trump and dragged America into a disastrous war for Israel's interests.

Piers Morgan drops a massive bombshell: Marco Rubio was caught on camera admitting the US launched a preemptive strike on Iran ONLY because Israel was about to attack. Netanyahu completely played Trump and dragged America into a disastrous war for Israel's interests.

Furkan Gözükara

406,039 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten