Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🔥🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Scot Bessent BODIES Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) then Rep. Lynch has a MELTDOWN. BESSENT: "Well, the Biden Administration..." LYNCH: "SIR, BE RESPONSIVE TO MY QUESTION!" BESSENT: "I am, sir." LYNCH: "Mister Chairman, the answers have to be responsive if we are going to have a serious...

ThePatriotOasis's profile picture

The Patriot Oasis™

367,530 subscribers

917,931 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"Could you speak a little louder? I can't hear you" -- Bessent is flat out taunting Democratic House members like Rep. Lynch here
0:40

"Could you speak a little louder? I can't hear you" -- Bessent is flat out taunting Democratic House members like Rep. Lynch here

Aaron Rupar

32,509 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 LMAO! Scott Bessent just SET OFF a Democrat Congressman who was screaming at him incoherently BESSENT: “Could you speak a little louder please?! I can’t hear you!” 🤣🔥 REP. LYNCH: “YEAH OK” Democrats deserve to be treated like children
0:33

🚨 LMAO! Scott Bessent just SET OFF a Democrat Congressman who was screaming at him incoherently BESSENT: “Could you speak a little louder please?! I can’t hear you!” 🤣🔥 REP. LYNCH: “YEAH OK” Democrats deserve to be treated like children

Nick Sortor

588,363 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

'I CAN'T HEAR YOU': Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent jokingly asks a shouting Democratic Rep. Stephen Lynch to “speak a little louder” during a tense exchange on corporate investigations.
0:22

'I CAN'T HEAR YOU': Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent jokingly asks a shouting Democratic Rep. Stephen Lynch to “speak a little louder” during a tense exchange on corporate investigations.

Fox News

254,164 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

TAPPER: When can we expect the Trump administration to make SNAP payments? BESSENT: Well, President Trump just truthed out that he needs to hear from the courts TAPPER: The courts have weighed in BESSENT: There's a process that has to be followed
1:29

TAPPER: When can we expect the Trump administration to make SNAP payments? BESSENT: Well, President Trump just truthed out that he needs to hear from the courts TAPPER: The courts have weighed in BESSENT: There's a process that has to be followed

Aaron Rupar

532,153 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Wouldn't Answer The Hypothetical. Rep. Linda Sánchez asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a simple question: If Joe Biden filed an amended tax return claiming the government owed him $1 billion, would that be audited? 🔥 Bessent refused to answer. That's what made the exchange notable. Sánchez wasn't really asking about Biden. She was testing whether the standard being applied to Trump would be applied to anyone else. And Bessent wouldn't engage.
0:23

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Wouldn't Answer The Hypothetical. Rep. Linda Sánchez asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a simple question: If Joe Biden filed an amended tax return claiming the government owed him $1 billion, would that be audited? 🔥 Bessent refused to answer. That's what made the exchange notable. Sánchez wasn't really asking about Biden. She was testing whether the standard being applied to Trump would be applied to anyone else. And Bessent wouldn't engage.

Brian Allen

68,098 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Meet the Press, September 7, 2025: BESSENT: So we would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs... . WELKER: And you're prepared to give those... refunds? BESSENT: "Well, I mean, there's no be prepared. If the court says it, we'd have to do it."
0:46

Meet the Press, September 7, 2025: BESSENT: So we would have to give a refund on about half the tariffs... . WELKER: And you're prepared to give those... refunds? BESSENT: "Well, I mean, there's no be prepared. If the court says it, we'd have to do it."

Scott Lincicome

34,727 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 OMG. Secretary Bessent just BRUTALLY EMBARRASSED this RUDE Democrat congressman LARSON (D): Are you in favor of eliminating the gas tax?! BESSENT: We have moved to— LARSON: —Are you IN FAVOR of ELIMINATING the gas tax?! Answer! BESSENT: Well if I'm NOT INTERRUPTED I CAN! LARSON: I'm waiting for your answer! BESSENT: We ASKED CONGRESS to eliminate the gas tax. That's done through statute. *Pause* LARSON: ...you moved that? You're in favor of eliminating the gas tax? BESSENT: We have ASKED for that. LARSON: You're in favor to eliminate the gas tax? BESSENT: AGAIN, the White House ASKED for it. LARSON: They have?! Why isn't it before the committee for a vote? BESSENT: I don't run the agenda. 😂💀 Clueless dolt!
1:03

🚨 OMG. Secretary Bessent just BRUTALLY EMBARRASSED this RUDE Democrat congressman LARSON (D): Are you in favor of eliminating the gas tax?! BESSENT: We have moved to— LARSON: —Are you IN FAVOR of ELIMINATING the gas tax?! Answer! BESSENT: Well if I'm NOT INTERRUPTED I CAN! LARSON: I'm waiting for your answer! BESSENT: We ASKED CONGRESS to eliminate the gas tax. That's done through statute. *Pause* LARSON: ...you moved that? You're in favor of eliminating the gas tax? BESSENT: We have ASKED for that. LARSON: You're in favor to eliminate the gas tax? BESSENT: AGAIN, the White House ASKED for it. LARSON: They have?! Why isn't it before the committee for a vote? BESSENT: I don't run the agenda. 😂💀 Clueless dolt!

Eric Daugherty

825,330 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."
1:44

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

Eric Daugherty

1,428,739 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔥🚨 BOOM! Sec. Scott Bessent has a HILARIOUS response to Sen. Thom Tillis... TILLIS: "I do have one awkward question. Did you actually tell Director Bill Pulte you'd punch him in the face?" BESSENT: "No, sir...I actually said I was going to KICK HIS ASS!" 😂 "That was Summer 2025. Many teams have fights in the locker room, then go out and win for the team."
0:34

🔥🚨 BOOM! Sec. Scott Bessent has a HILARIOUS response to Sen. Thom Tillis... TILLIS: "I do have one awkward question. Did you actually tell Director Bill Pulte you'd punch him in the face?" BESSENT: "No, sir...I actually said I was going to KICK HIS ASS!" 😂 "That was Summer 2025. Many teams have fights in the locker room, then go out and win for the team."

The Patriot Oasis™

118,103 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Rep. Torres: Does the president have the constitutional authority to remove the chair of the Federal Reserve solely because of a policy disagreement? Bessent: I'm not a lawyer and I don't have an opinion. Rep. Torres: What is the administration's opinion? Bessent: There are varying opinions in the administration
0:52

Rep. Torres: Does the president have the constitutional authority to remove the chair of the Federal Reserve solely because of a policy disagreement? Bessent: I'm not a lawyer and I don't have an opinion. Rep. Torres: What is the administration's opinion? Bessent: There are varying opinions in the administration

FactPost

16,048 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 LMFAO! WATTERS: We want people to have babies during the Trump administration SCOTT BESSENT: Exactly. The Vice President has done it. Karoline Leavitt. Stephen Miller. WATTERS: You guys are very busy! BESSENT: We know what their hobby is! 🤣
0:22

🚨 LMFAO! WATTERS: We want people to have babies during the Trump administration SCOTT BESSENT: Exactly. The Vice President has done it. Karoline Leavitt. Stephen Miller. WATTERS: You guys are very busy! BESSENT: We know what their hobby is! 🤣

Eric Daugherty

244,812 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."
1:44

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just rhetorically bodied a Democrat congresswoman who understands NOTHING about dealmaking & foreign policy. Clown show. VELAZQUEZ (D-NY): "Specifically, which countries are you close to striking deal with?" BESSENT: "I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States." VELAZQUEZ: "No, no, no. I'm asking you a question based on the statement that you made on CNBC." BESSENT: "And I am telling you that it would be detrimental to the interest of the United States for me to answer that question." VELAZQUEZ: "Why would that be detrimental?" BESSENT: "Because as the negotiations may still be in process as we speak, as we are not at the end of the week yet, I am sure that you, through your question, would not want to compromise U.S. negotiations." VELAZQUEZ: "Reclaiming my time." BESSENT: "Would you?" VELAZQUEZ: "Why would you not answer my question? And that would be considered detrimental to the American people, to the American economy. I do not understand." BESSENT: "Congresswoman, I'm happy to say there are negotiations going on. I'm not going to reveal the details."

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

157,862 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Scott Bessent FIRES BACK at ABC's Jon Karl on the MN shooting KARL: There's no evidence he brandished the gun! BESSENT: But he BROUGHT a gun. Have you ever gone to a protest, Jon? Have you? I have. Guess what. I didn't bring a gun, I brought a billboard!
0:25

🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Scott Bessent FIRES BACK at ABC's Jon Karl on the MN shooting KARL: There's no evidence he brandished the gun! BESSENT: But he BROUGHT a gun. Have you ever gone to a protest, Jon? Have you? I have. Guess what. I didn't bring a gun, I brought a billboard!

Eric Daugherty

1,226,541 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 LMAO! SEC. BESSENT: "I will mention three weeks ago, I got an honorary degree from the University of South Carolina. So if you REALLY want to get a question, call me DOCTOR Bessent" REPORTER: "DOCTOR BESSENT!" *room breaks out in laughter* 🤣
0:20

🚨 LMAO! SEC. BESSENT: "I will mention three weeks ago, I got an honorary degree from the University of South Carolina. So if you REALLY want to get a question, call me DOCTOR Bessent" REPORTER: "DOCTOR BESSENT!" *room breaks out in laughter* 🤣

Nick Sortor

591,409 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Scott Bessent is EMBARRASSING low-IQ Rep. Maxine Waters right now, this is priceless 😂 WATERS: Did you say Trump's tariffs are INFLATIONARY?! BESSENT: "Uhh...no. 🤨" WATERS: OK, we have a New York Times article- BESSENT: "-*New York Times?* 😂" WATERS: Are tariffs inflationary?! BESSENT: According to the San Francisco Federal Reserve, with 150 years of data- WATERS: Yes or no?!?! BESSENT: Tariffs do not cause inflation. San Francisco Federal Reserve. 150 YEARS of data. Bessent has about quadruple her IQ 😭😭
1:38

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Scott Bessent is EMBARRASSING low-IQ Rep. Maxine Waters right now, this is priceless 😂 WATERS: Did you say Trump's tariffs are INFLATIONARY?! BESSENT: "Uhh...no. 🤨" WATERS: OK, we have a New York Times article- BESSENT: "-*New York Times?* 😂" WATERS: Are tariffs inflationary?! BESSENT: According to the San Francisco Federal Reserve, with 150 years of data- WATERS: Yes or no?!?! BESSENT: Tariffs do not cause inflation. San Francisco Federal Reserve. 150 YEARS of data. Bessent has about quadruple her IQ 😭😭

Eric Daugherty

1,121,512 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on if the Trump Administration will use emergency funds to cover SNAP benefits. BESSENT: "There's a process that has to be followed. So, we got to figure out what the process is. President Trump wants to make sure that people get their food benefits. TAPPER: "So it could be done by Wednesday?" BESSENT: "Could be."
0:23

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on if the Trump Administration will use emergency funds to cover SNAP benefits. BESSENT: "There's a process that has to be followed. So, we got to figure out what the process is. President Trump wants to make sure that people get their food benefits. TAPPER: "So it could be done by Wednesday?" BESSENT: "Could be."

State of the Union

46,374 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent STUNS the NYT after exposing that affordability is worse in blue states 🤣🔥 BESSENT: Affordability is worse in a blue state. NYT: We can debate that... BESSENT: Oh, no. There's no debate! 50 basis points higher inflation. The 10 highest inflation rates are in blue cities. NYT: I looked...since 2021, the highest inflation has been in RED states, especially Florida. BESSENT: I am talking about CURRENT. NYT: Current?? Not over 4 years? BESSENT: Right...TODAY. *Crowd is laughing* BESSENT: TODAY, it is 50 basis points higher. And I have the American people on my side! NY, IL, CA, MA are depopulating! 🔥🔥🔥 Scott NEVER MISSES!
1:25

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent STUNS the NYT after exposing that affordability is worse in blue states 🤣🔥 BESSENT: Affordability is worse in a blue state. NYT: We can debate that... BESSENT: Oh, no. There's no debate! 50 basis points higher inflation. The 10 highest inflation rates are in blue cities. NYT: I looked...since 2021, the highest inflation has been in RED states, especially Florida. BESSENT: I am talking about CURRENT. NYT: Current?? Not over 4 years? BESSENT: Right...TODAY. *Crowd is laughing* BESSENT: TODAY, it is 50 basis points higher. And I have the American people on my side! NY, IL, CA, MA are depopulating! 🔥🔥🔥 Scott NEVER MISSES!

Eric Daugherty

510,262 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.
1:28

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten