正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 BREAKING: SecWar Pete Hegseth just dropped truth nukes on anyone crying "WAR CRIME!" against America "NO nation takes more precautions to ensure there's never targeting of civilians than the United States of America!" "From the boat strikes in the Caribbean, where every single strike is assessed to these... to this campaign here, no nation in the history of warfare has ever attempted in every way possible to avoid civilian casualties." "And frankly — that's a point that just isn't appreciated enough." "Where things happen that need to be investigated, we will investigate, to the question shouted in the back, that it's not, open source is not the place to determine what did or did not happen." "We take things very, very seriously and investigate them thoroughly, which takes time and which is why it does take time." "But ultimately, unlike Iran, who targets civilians indiscriminately, who we've seen in the intel, moving rocket launchers into civilian neighborhoods, near schools, near hospitals, to try to prevent our ability to strike." "That's how they operate. And then they set the targeting of drones and missiles toward civilian targets. Hospitals, hotels, airports. CENTCOM has been very good about putting that information out." "That's how terrorist regimes fight. They target civilians. We do not. And I can tell you, this administration and this Pentagon focuses on that very, very closely."show more

Eric Daugherty

980,292 subscribers

50,975 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 JUST IN: SecWar Pete Hegseth responds to whether the US is responsible for striking an Iranian elementary school and killing civilians "There's only one entity in this conflict between us and Iran that never targets civilians. LITERALLY never targets civilians." "I look at the process that's used on dynamic strikes or on boat strikes and others." "We have a very high-fidelity process in that case. So we don't target, Iran does. We will investigate, and we'll get to the truth, and we'll share it when we have it."

🚨 JUST IN: SecWar Pete Hegseth responds to whether the US is responsible for striking an Iranian elementary school and killing civilians "There's only one entity in this conflict between us and Iran that never targets civilians. LITERALLY never targets civilians." "I look at the process that's used on dynamic strikes or on boat strikes and others." "We have a very high-fidelity process in that case. So we don't target, Iran does. We will investigate, and we'll get to the truth, and we'll share it when we have it."

Eric Daugherty

22,487 次观看 • 6 个月前

Scott Jennings cuts right through the CNN panel as they trash Pete Hegseth over an alleged school strike in Iran — delivering a STUNNING defense of the Secretary of War. JENNINGS: “I think the most important thing Hegseth said...and all Americans need to know and understand this...the difference between us and the enemy; we DO NOT target civilians.” “When it happens, and it will happen in war, it is tragic and it is not meant to be.” “The enemy targets civilians.” “They hide behind civilians.” “They fund people who set up bases in hospitals so that civilians are in the way.” “That’s not what we do.” “An investigation needs to occur. All the truth needs to be told, and we will give transparency to the American people.” “But there’s two parts of this war; our part and the enemy.” “The enemy targets civilians. Look what they’re doing all over the region, firing missiles intermittently.”

Scott Jennings cuts right through the CNN panel as they trash Pete Hegseth over an alleged school strike in Iran — delivering a STUNNING defense of the Secretary of War. JENNINGS: “I think the most important thing Hegseth said...and all Americans need to know and understand this...the difference between us and the enemy; we DO NOT target civilians.” “When it happens, and it will happen in war, it is tragic and it is not meant to be.” “The enemy targets civilians.” “They hide behind civilians.” “They fund people who set up bases in hospitals so that civilians are in the way.” “That’s not what we do.” “An investigation needs to occur. All the truth needs to be told, and we will give transparency to the American people.” “But there’s two parts of this war; our part and the enemy.” “The enemy targets civilians. Look what they’re doing all over the region, firing missiles intermittently.”

Overton

415,454 次观看 • 6 个月前

It's really important to understand that not only has there been no genocide in Gaza, it's the opposite. It's actually the most humane, the most precise urban warfare fight the world has ever known. It's a war that was run, for the most part, by lawyers, international law scholars and lawyers called MAGs, military advocate generals, who are deployed in the field with the commanders, thousands of them, and who evaluate every action, every strike. And unlike here in the United States, where JAG officers give advice to commanders and say, "Hey, this is a precatory piece of advice. You can disregard it if you want," in Israel, the MAG's advice is not precatory. It's a mandatory order that must be followed by the commander. Every single day in Gaza, strikes on legitimate military targets are canceled, and I've seen this with my own eyes dozens and dozens and dozens of times, because of the risk of collateral consequences to civilians in Gaza. That's the very opposite of genocide. Think about real genocides in history. When you take the Nazis, for example, who pushed my mother's half-brothers and sisters into the gas chambers, they weren't looking to warn civilians to get out of the killing zone. They weren't looking to cancel strikes, which is to say a gas chamber, because there were too many civilians near the gas chambers. The whole purpose, the whole architecture of a genocidal regime was to push the civilians into the killing zone. Israel cancels strikes because of a fear of civilian casualties. It employs the most sophisticated civilian warning system the world has ever seen that gets civilians out of the killing zone in the war. Israel then shepherds them to safety, provides them with food purveyors, medical clinics, and the polio vaccine for 98% of the children in Al Mawasi—given for free by the Israeli government and by Israeli doctors to children in Gaza—this is the very opposite of what we would expect if there were a genocide.

It's really important to understand that not only has there been no genocide in Gaza, it's the opposite. It's actually the most humane, the most precise urban warfare fight the world has ever known. It's a war that was run, for the most part, by lawyers, international law scholars and lawyers called MAGs, military advocate generals, who are deployed in the field with the commanders, thousands of them, and who evaluate every action, every strike. And unlike here in the United States, where JAG officers give advice to commanders and say, "Hey, this is a precatory piece of advice. You can disregard it if you want," in Israel, the MAG's advice is not precatory. It's a mandatory order that must be followed by the commander. Every single day in Gaza, strikes on legitimate military targets are canceled, and I've seen this with my own eyes dozens and dozens and dozens of times, because of the risk of collateral consequences to civilians in Gaza. That's the very opposite of genocide. Think about real genocides in history. When you take the Nazis, for example, who pushed my mother's half-brothers and sisters into the gas chambers, they weren't looking to warn civilians to get out of the killing zone. They weren't looking to cancel strikes, which is to say a gas chamber, because there were too many civilians near the gas chambers. The whole purpose, the whole architecture of a genocidal regime was to push the civilians into the killing zone. Israel cancels strikes because of a fear of civilian casualties. It employs the most sophisticated civilian warning system the world has ever seen that gets civilians out of the killing zone in the war. Israel then shepherds them to safety, provides them with food purveyors, medical clinics, and the polio vaccine for 98% of the children in Al Mawasi—given for free by the Israeli government and by Israeli doctors to children in Gaza—this is the very opposite of what we would expect if there were a genocide.

Roy K. Altman

15,494 次观看 • 3 个月前

Secretary Hegseth calmly shuts down chief Karen of the Democrat Party, Senator Kristen Gillibrand, as she launches into a shouting tirade. Hegseth stayed ice cold and stopped her in her tracks with the facts. GILLIBRAND: “Let’s talk about how you’re prosecuting the war.” “What is your response to targeting that has resulted in the destruction of schools, hospitals, civilian places?” “Why did you cut by 90% the division that’s supposed to help you, not target civilians?” “And do you know the impact of a strategic failure at a war when you have so many civilian casualties?” “You may have tactically completed a mission well, but strategically is not meeting your goals because of the harms to civilians.” “What is the cost of that?!” HEGSETH: “No military, no country works harder at every echelon to ensure they protect civilian lives than the United States Military.” “And that is an ironclad commitment that we make no matter how, no matter what systems we use.”

Secretary Hegseth calmly shuts down chief Karen of the Democrat Party, Senator Kristen Gillibrand, as she launches into a shouting tirade. Hegseth stayed ice cold and stopped her in her tracks with the facts. GILLIBRAND: “Let’s talk about how you’re prosecuting the war.” “What is your response to targeting that has resulted in the destruction of schools, hospitals, civilian places?” “Why did you cut by 90% the division that’s supposed to help you, not target civilians?” “And do you know the impact of a strategic failure at a war when you have so many civilian casualties?” “You may have tactically completed a mission well, but strategically is not meeting your goals because of the harms to civilians.” “What is the cost of that?!” HEGSETH: “No military, no country works harder at every echelon to ensure they protect civilian lives than the United States Military.” “And that is an ironclad commitment that we make no matter how, no matter what systems we use.”

Overton

320,230 次观看 • 4 个月前

Biden's Secretary of State Blinken on Iran: The Iranians put us in a position where we've used up a lot of interceptors to deal with defense, or even our offensive missiles to take out their launchers. Or conversely, did they run out and we still have what we need? I don't know the numbers here — I'm not privy to that — but it is something we have to be very attentive to because these things are not in infinite supply. The production times are very long. And of course we're also using, in many cases, very expensive weapons to take down $20,000 drones. That's not a good equation if you keep that going over time.

Biden's Secretary of State Blinken on Iran: The Iranians put us in a position where we've used up a lot of interceptors to deal with defense, or even our offensive missiles to take out their launchers. Or conversely, did they run out and we still have what we need? I don't know the numbers here — I'm not privy to that — but it is something we have to be very attentive to because these things are not in infinite supply. The production times are very long. And of course we're also using, in many cases, very expensive weapons to take down $20,000 drones. That's not a good equation if you keep that going over time.

Clash Report

41,678 次观看 • 6 个月前

"No nation in the history of warfare takes more precautions to ensure there's never targeting of civilians than the US" — US Sec. Of War, Hegseth Does anyone really believe this nonsense? If Russia was the US, we would have 5x civilian casualties for every Ukrainian soldier. Yet in 12years of conflict in Ukraine, it has amounted to 15,000 between both sides. The US in Iraq was 500,000, Vietnam 2mil. And then they call Russia a villain.

"No nation in the history of warfare takes more precautions to ensure there's never targeting of civilians than the US" — US Sec. Of War, Hegseth Does anyone really believe this nonsense? If Russia was the US, we would have 5x civilian casualties for every Ukrainian soldier. Yet in 12years of conflict in Ukraine, it has amounted to 15,000 between both sides. The US in Iraq was 500,000, Vietnam 2mil. And then they call Russia a villain.

Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺

70,854 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨Pentagon Whistleblower: ‘Hegseth’s wilful recklessness in killing civilians in Iran is a WAR CRIME. The US🇺🇸 military leadership is carrying out every order no matter how ILLEGAL OR IMMORAL.’ ‘There’s a thing in international law called wilful recklessness, which Israel also falls under in its operations in Gaza and elsewhere, where if you display recklessness and negligence as a pattern, that can also be a war crime… Even if you are not so-called intentionally going out and targeting all these civilians and civilian infrastructure. And so we have, at the very least, a negligence, a recklessness in targeting. And I believe the culture that Hegseth is proliferating, what he’s directing is these massive amounts of strikes which leads to recklessness. He’s no doubt directing a higher tolerance for civilian casualties. Now, these are things that he’s likely not going to disclose, and it’s probably being done verbally within classified communications channels. But he can direct these things as the Secretary of Defence. And all the evidence I see is that’s what’s going on. That’s the precedent that he’s setting. And this is the guidance that he’s giving to the force. And somehow our senior military leadership is bending the knee and carrying out any order that Hegseth is directing, no matter how illegal, unconstitutional, unethical or immoral. We’ll go back to the Minab school strike. I’ve heard over and over again him responding combatively to our US representatives and to media about how so-called precise the US is and nobody’s better at protecting civilians and the innocent. I would argue that if we were that good, we wouldn’t have just completely negligently dropped missiles on hundreds of young schoolgirls in Iran. And then on top of that, not accounted for it or even apologised.’ -Master Sgt. Wes Bryant, Pentagon Whistleblower and Former Pentagon Chief of Civilian Harm Assessments, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

🚨Pentagon Whistleblower: ‘Hegseth’s wilful recklessness in killing civilians in Iran is a WAR CRIME. The US🇺🇸 military leadership is carrying out every order no matter how ILLEGAL OR IMMORAL.’ ‘There’s a thing in international law called wilful recklessness, which Israel also falls under in its operations in Gaza and elsewhere, where if you display recklessness and negligence as a pattern, that can also be a war crime… Even if you are not so-called intentionally going out and targeting all these civilians and civilian infrastructure. And so we have, at the very least, a negligence, a recklessness in targeting. And I believe the culture that Hegseth is proliferating, what he’s directing is these massive amounts of strikes which leads to recklessness. He’s no doubt directing a higher tolerance for civilian casualties. Now, these are things that he’s likely not going to disclose, and it’s probably being done verbally within classified communications channels. But he can direct these things as the Secretary of Defence. And all the evidence I see is that’s what’s going on. That’s the precedent that he’s setting. And this is the guidance that he’s giving to the force. And somehow our senior military leadership is bending the knee and carrying out any order that Hegseth is directing, no matter how illegal, unconstitutional, unethical or immoral. We’ll go back to the Minab school strike. I’ve heard over and over again him responding combatively to our US representatives and to media about how so-called precise the US is and nobody’s better at protecting civilians and the innocent. I would argue that if we were that good, we wouldn’t have just completely negligently dropped missiles on hundreds of young schoolgirls in Iran. And then on top of that, not accounted for it or even apologised.’ -Master Sgt. Wes Bryant, Pentagon Whistleblower and Former Pentagon Chief of Civilian Harm Assessments, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

19,477 次观看 • 4 个月前

John Spencer, Richard Kemp, and Andrew Fox are experts in the field of urban warfare, and I detail their findings in my new book, Israel on Trial: Examining the History, the Evidence, and the Law. In urban warfare, the average militant-to-civilian casualty ratio is about 1 to 9, meaning one militant killed for every nine civilians killed. That's not because every war that's ever been fought is a genocide. It's because war is horrible and urban warfare in particular is horrible. That's why Israel would much prefer to fight Hamas out in the open. It's Hamas who chooses to fight in Gaza underneath its civilian population precisely to increase—not decrease—the number of civilian casualties. In the American war in Iraq and Afghanistan, we and our allies set the gold standard. We had a militant-to-civilian kill ratio of about one to four-and-a-half, maybe one to five, and many experts believed no army would ever be able to meet that standard again. In much more difficult and complicated circumstances, Israel, even if you believe Hamas's bogus numbers—which you should not believe for all the reasons I lay out in the book—but even if you took Hamas at completely face value and you believed all of their numbers, Israel has a militant to civilian kill ratio of about one to one-and-a-half in Gaza. If Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, then the Americans committed genocide in Iraq and Afghanistan, then the Americans and the allies committed genocide in Germany and Japan, and literally every war that has ever been fought in human history has been a genocide. That's not what genocide means. We should reserve the label for the crime of all crimes, because otherwise the consequences will be dire.

John Spencer, Richard Kemp, and Andrew Fox are experts in the field of urban warfare, and I detail their findings in my new book, Israel on Trial: Examining the History, the Evidence, and the Law. In urban warfare, the average militant-to-civilian casualty ratio is about 1 to 9, meaning one militant killed for every nine civilians killed. That's not because every war that's ever been fought is a genocide. It's because war is horrible and urban warfare in particular is horrible. That's why Israel would much prefer to fight Hamas out in the open. It's Hamas who chooses to fight in Gaza underneath its civilian population precisely to increase—not decrease—the number of civilian casualties. In the American war in Iraq and Afghanistan, we and our allies set the gold standard. We had a militant-to-civilian kill ratio of about one to four-and-a-half, maybe one to five, and many experts believed no army would ever be able to meet that standard again. In much more difficult and complicated circumstances, Israel, even if you believe Hamas's bogus numbers—which you should not believe for all the reasons I lay out in the book—but even if you took Hamas at completely face value and you believed all of their numbers, Israel has a militant to civilian kill ratio of about one to one-and-a-half in Gaza. If Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, then the Americans committed genocide in Iraq and Afghanistan, then the Americans and the allies committed genocide in Germany and Japan, and literally every war that has ever been fought in human history has been a genocide. That's not what genocide means. We should reserve the label for the crime of all crimes, because otherwise the consequences will be dire.

Roy K. Altman

42,262 次观看 • 4 个月前

Israel’s doing the very opposite of genocide. Israel does everything in its power to move civilians out of harm’s way in order to preserve and protect them. I'll give you an example. Israel, at the beginning of the war, would warn civilians to get out of harm’s way. They would say, “here are the areas that we’re going to attack tomorrow, the next day, and the day after that you need to leave so that we can fight Hamas who’s hiding in those places.” Already that’s the very opposite of genocide. Genocide requires an army to be pushing civilians into the killing zone. Here’s an army warning civilians to get out of the killing zone. But here’s the thing, over time Israel learned that Hamas was not going to tolerate that. Hamas, we know from their private correspondence, they want more civilians to die, not less. They want to convince the world that Israel is bad, so that Israel can be easily destroyed. So they start killing civilians who are fleeing the war zone. They start at gunpoint, forcing civilians to go back into the places that Israel is going to attack in order to increase the amount of civilian casualties. Israel learns about this and what does Israel do? Israel starts building these humanitarian corridors—these are unheard of in warfare. They started at 4 hours a day, 8 hours a day. Ultimately there were 16, sometimes 20 hours a day, where Israel would man these highways that they would create. They would put their own soldiers, Israeli sons and daughters on the front lines of these highways to sit there and guard Palestinian civilians from other Palestinians as they fled the war zone to make sure that Hamas couldn't kill them as they fled. Again, that’s doubly the opposite of genocide and the numbers bear this out. In fact, every month since the war went on, you see the ratio of militants-to-civilians killed get lower and lower and lower so that ultimately, at the end of the war, when they go into Rafah—where Israel moved 1.2 million civilians out of harm’s way in order to destroy the final stronghold of Hamas in southern Gaza—you see the lowest civilian casualties of the war, at the end of the war. Again, it’s the very opposite of a genocide.

Israel’s doing the very opposite of genocide. Israel does everything in its power to move civilians out of harm’s way in order to preserve and protect them. I'll give you an example. Israel, at the beginning of the war, would warn civilians to get out of harm’s way. They would say, “here are the areas that we’re going to attack tomorrow, the next day, and the day after that you need to leave so that we can fight Hamas who’s hiding in those places.” Already that’s the very opposite of genocide. Genocide requires an army to be pushing civilians into the killing zone. Here’s an army warning civilians to get out of the killing zone. But here’s the thing, over time Israel learned that Hamas was not going to tolerate that. Hamas, we know from their private correspondence, they want more civilians to die, not less. They want to convince the world that Israel is bad, so that Israel can be easily destroyed. So they start killing civilians who are fleeing the war zone. They start at gunpoint, forcing civilians to go back into the places that Israel is going to attack in order to increase the amount of civilian casualties. Israel learns about this and what does Israel do? Israel starts building these humanitarian corridors—these are unheard of in warfare. They started at 4 hours a day, 8 hours a day. Ultimately there were 16, sometimes 20 hours a day, where Israel would man these highways that they would create. They would put their own soldiers, Israeli sons and daughters on the front lines of these highways to sit there and guard Palestinian civilians from other Palestinians as they fled the war zone to make sure that Hamas couldn't kill them as they fled. Again, that’s doubly the opposite of genocide and the numbers bear this out. In fact, every month since the war went on, you see the ratio of militants-to-civilians killed get lower and lower and lower so that ultimately, at the end of the war, when they go into Rafah—where Israel moved 1.2 million civilians out of harm’s way in order to destroy the final stronghold of Hamas in southern Gaza—you see the lowest civilian casualties of the war, at the end of the war. Again, it’s the very opposite of a genocide.

Roy K. Altman

15,434 次观看 • 3 天前

Hegseth on reports of an Iranian elementary school being struck: "There's only one entity in this conflict between us and Iran that never targets civilians. Literally never targets civilians." "We have a very high-fidelity process. We don't target civilians, Iran does. We will investigate, and we'll get to the truth, and we'll share it when we have it."

Hegseth on reports of an Iranian elementary school being struck: "There's only one entity in this conflict between us and Iran that never targets civilians. Literally never targets civilians." "We have a very high-fidelity process. We don't target civilians, Iran does. We will investigate, and we'll get to the truth, and we'll share it when we have it."

Open Source Intel

41,625 次观看 • 6 个月前

🇹🇷🇷🇺🇺🇦 Turkish FM Fidan on the Russia-Ukraine war: "The war itself has truly shifted over the past year from a war of attrition to a war of destruction. There is now no place that is not being targeted. We are also seeing civilian casualties steadily increase. As a nation that knows war and knows how to fight, we said from the very beginning where this would lead. This will escalate increasingly. Geographically, methodically and in terms of targets, unfortunately, this is the point we have reached. This needs to STOP to prevent it from spreading further and causing more disasters..." 💯💯💯💯 Writer: Michael

🇹🇷🇷🇺🇺🇦 Turkish FM Fidan on the Russia-Ukraine war: "The war itself has truly shifted over the past year from a war of attrition to a war of destruction. There is now no place that is not being targeted. We are also seeing civilian casualties steadily increase. As a nation that knows war and knows how to fight, we said from the very beginning where this would lead. This will escalate increasingly. Geographically, methodically and in terms of targets, unfortunately, this is the point we have reached. This needs to STOP to prevent it from spreading further and causing more disasters..." 💯💯💯💯 Writer: Michael

Mario Nawfal

42,963 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance says President Trump has ALL the cards, and Iran better understand it "We want Iran to not be able to make a nuclear weapon. We want the nuclear fuel, which is something the president has made very clear." "And again, the way to think about this is the United States has certain demands and certain things that we want. The Iranians have things they can get out of the negotiation. The more that they're willing to give us, I think the more they're going to get things out of this negotiation. The president's talked about sanctions relief." "The president's talked about economic partnerships and things like that. That's not going to happen unless the Iranians make a firm commitment to stop anything close to the development of a nuclear weapon." "And frankly, the president has all the cards here. We've got a lot of leverage. We've got a lot of things that we can do, but right now, I think we're in a good spot."

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance says President Trump has ALL the cards, and Iran better understand it "We want Iran to not be able to make a nuclear weapon. We want the nuclear fuel, which is something the president has made very clear." "And again, the way to think about this is the United States has certain demands and certain things that we want. The Iranians have things they can get out of the negotiation. The more that they're willing to give us, I think the more they're going to get things out of this negotiation. The president's talked about sanctions relief." "The president's talked about economic partnerships and things like that. That's not going to happen unless the Iranians make a firm commitment to stop anything close to the development of a nuclear weapon." "And frankly, the president has all the cards here. We've got a lot of leverage. We've got a lot of things that we can do, but right now, I think we're in a good spot."

Eric Daugherty

23,262 次观看 • 5 个月前

Rogin: This is the most unpopular war in American history by far, and for good reason. And the way that these things work is that the longer that it goes on, the popularity goes down, not up over time. And that is a calamity for the Republican party. But that's not what's important right now. What's important is that it's a calamity for the United States of America, for our national security, for our alliances abroad, for putting our troops in danger with no clear strategy of what achieves a victory and how to get them out of there. And how does this end? And without any of those answers, everybody can see that the administration is flailing about. And the way we know they have no strategy because the strategy changes every single day with various justifications that don't make any sense when compared to one another. And that's where we are. And that's a pretty sad state of affairs. And yes, that's going to be terrible for Republicans in November, but that's really not the most worst thing about it. And Donald Trump doesn't seem to care about that anyway.

Rogin: This is the most unpopular war in American history by far, and for good reason. And the way that these things work is that the longer that it goes on, the popularity goes down, not up over time. And that is a calamity for the Republican party. But that's not what's important right now. What's important is that it's a calamity for the United States of America, for our national security, for our alliances abroad, for putting our troops in danger with no clear strategy of what achieves a victory and how to get them out of there. And how does this end? And without any of those answers, everybody can see that the administration is flailing about. And the way we know they have no strategy because the strategy changes every single day with various justifications that don't make any sense when compared to one another. And that's where we are. And that's a pretty sad state of affairs. And yes, that's going to be terrible for Republicans in November, but that's really not the most worst thing about it. And Donald Trump doesn't seem to care about that anyway.

Acyn

49,764 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth just dropped TRUTH NUKES "We negotiate with BOMBS. You have a choice, as we loiter over the top of Tehran about your future." "This is NOT Iraq and Afghanistan." "The War Department agrees. Our job is to ensure that. And so we're keeping our hand on that throttle as long as as hard as is necessary to ensure the interest of the United States of America are achieved on that battlefield!" "This is not a President who's interested in vague end states. He's been very clear with us about what we need to accomplish, creating the conditions for them never to have a nuclear capability. And that's exactly what we're doing in historic fashion." 🇺🇸

🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth just dropped TRUTH NUKES "We negotiate with BOMBS. You have a choice, as we loiter over the top of Tehran about your future." "This is NOT Iraq and Afghanistan." "The War Department agrees. Our job is to ensure that. And so we're keeping our hand on that throttle as long as as hard as is necessary to ensure the interest of the United States of America are achieved on that battlefield!" "This is not a President who's interested in vague end states. He's been very clear with us about what we need to accomplish, creating the conditions for them never to have a nuclear capability. And that's exactly what we're doing in historic fashion." 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

1,053,651 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 SECWAR PETE HEGSETH JUST NOW: "President Trump means it when he looks in the camera in the cabinet room and said, they can either do this NOW through a deal, and we think we're in a good place to make that deal, or they can deal with the WAR DEPARTMENT!" 🔥 "We are prepared. We're postured even stronger today than we were on day one to address it that way if we have to, but he'd prefer not to." "So Iran knows very, very clearly what our expectations are, and that's on the negotiating team to deliver." "They're coming in our direction. The talks have been productive. I think they know where it needs to go." "And I'm quite confident with this, with our president, who makes nothing but great deals that ultimately, it'll be something he's proud to defend that ensures that Iran, which everyone knows, should not have a nuclear weapon, never does."

🚨 SECWAR PETE HEGSETH JUST NOW: "President Trump means it when he looks in the camera in the cabinet room and said, they can either do this NOW through a deal, and we think we're in a good place to make that deal, or they can deal with the WAR DEPARTMENT!" 🔥 "We are prepared. We're postured even stronger today than we were on day one to address it that way if we have to, but he'd prefer not to." "So Iran knows very, very clearly what our expectations are, and that's on the negotiating team to deliver." "They're coming in our direction. The talks have been productive. I think they know where it needs to go." "And I'm quite confident with this, with our president, who makes nothing but great deals that ultimately, it'll be something he's proud to defend that ensures that Iran, which everyone knows, should not have a nuclear weapon, never does."

Eric Daugherty

123,496 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance says conservatives should stop BLACK-PILLING, and he nailed it "Blackpilling is how you give power to the forces that are trying to DESTROY what our ancestors built." "They say, 'that's not what we voted for. We're going to check out of politics.' No! That's the exact wrong response." "If we do something you don't like, the response should be to get MORE involved, to make your voice HEARD, and to try to push things in the direction that you want them to be pushed." "Our civilization was not built overnight! It's not going to be saved overnight." Truth! "What I'd encourage you to do is stay involved, be patient, and don't let disappointment turn to checking out of the system entirely." "There's way too much of that, I would say, in the Anglo system and the American system. There's way too much, 'I didn't like this thing that the vice president said, or I didn't like this thing that the president did, and I'm going to completely check out.' We call that blackpilling in the United States of America." "We need to take power back from those people and build the kind of institutions that can actually save our societies." "It will not happen overnight. It will not happen in the term of one prime minister or one president, but it will happen so long as we keep our faith in God and we work hard to achieve it. That's what we have to do."

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance says conservatives should stop BLACK-PILLING, and he nailed it "Blackpilling is how you give power to the forces that are trying to DESTROY what our ancestors built." "They say, 'that's not what we voted for. We're going to check out of politics.' No! That's the exact wrong response." "If we do something you don't like, the response should be to get MORE involved, to make your voice HEARD, and to try to push things in the direction that you want them to be pushed." "Our civilization was not built overnight! It's not going to be saved overnight." Truth! "What I'd encourage you to do is stay involved, be patient, and don't let disappointment turn to checking out of the system entirely." "There's way too much of that, I would say, in the Anglo system and the American system. There's way too much, 'I didn't like this thing that the vice president said, or I didn't like this thing that the president did, and I'm going to completely check out.' We call that blackpilling in the United States of America." "We need to take power back from those people and build the kind of institutions that can actually save our societies." "It will not happen overnight. It will not happen in the term of one prime minister or one president, but it will happen so long as we keep our faith in God and we work hard to achieve it. That's what we have to do."

Eric Daugherty

442,500 次观看 • 5 个月前

Arteta on the players battling a physical strain: “Yes, but when I see them track back, when we lose the ball and the habits that they have, it's just amazing. That's why I know what they are doing, these players. There is a reason why we are the only English team in the competition, because this league and this schedule takes the hell out of you and it's very difficult to do what we've done. “We are not perfect, we need to improve things, that's for sure, we recognise that, but let's value what these players have done because they deserve it.”

Arteta on the players battling a physical strain: “Yes, but when I see them track back, when we lose the ball and the habits that they have, it's just amazing. That's why I know what they are doing, these players. There is a reason why we are the only English team in the competition, because this league and this schedule takes the hell out of you and it's very difficult to do what we've done. “We are not perfect, we need to improve things, that's for sure, we recognise that, but let's value what these players have done because they deserve it.”

Connor Humm

55,160 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dr. Ruxandra Teslo argues America's biotech problem isn't the science, it's how slowly we learn from humans: "This is going to be more and more of a bottleneck as science advances especially in oncology. It's not just that we don't have enough clinical trials and they are expensive. This has become worse and worse throughout the years." "The article is particularly focused on these phase one clinical trials. These are the trials where you first take a new drug into humans for the first time. The reason we're focusing on those, they are some of the most important trials because that's where you can actually start to learn and do iterative loops of learning in humans." "What you learn from that goes back into the science and you can engineer something better. We can see from China, they're very very good doing their phase one trials fast, that is very much responsible for propelling them ahead, almost ahead of the US in just a decade, despite the fact that their science is not as good." "We have a very good model for how to do them faster and better, which is Australia." Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 Adam Kroetsch IFP

Dr. Ruxandra Teslo argues America's biotech problem isn't the science, it's how slowly we learn from humans: "This is going to be more and more of a bottleneck as science advances especially in oncology. It's not just that we don't have enough clinical trials and they are expensive. This has become worse and worse throughout the years." "The article is particularly focused on these phase one clinical trials. These are the trials where you first take a new drug into humans for the first time. The reason we're focusing on those, they are some of the most important trials because that's where you can actually start to learn and do iterative loops of learning in humans." "What you learn from that goes back into the science and you can engineer something better. We can see from China, they're very very good doing their phase one trials fast, that is very much responsible for propelling them ahead, almost ahead of the US in just a decade, despite the fact that their science is not as good." "We have a very good model for how to do them faster and better, which is Australia." Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 Adam Kroetsch IFP

MTS

16,475 次观看 • 20 天前

🚨 JUST IN: Speaker Johnson says Iran better WATCH how many troops President Trump floods to the region and make a deal "The buildup of troops is very different than boots on the ground. We don't have boots on the ground. I don't think that's the intention, but I think Iran should WATCH that buildup, and they need to take note of that!" "They have to reopen the strait. They have to be good neighbors to their Middle East neighbors over there in the region." "They cannot have a nuclear warhead. They cannot have that capability. And they cannot declare war on the United States and Israel, which is what they did decades ago." "Our mission will be accomplished. I think that will wrap up in a short time period, and I know that's the intention of the administration and the Department of War." "We have the greatest, most powerful military fighting force ever conceived in the history of planet Earth." "It's an amazing, an amazing power that we have, and we willed it for good. We've done it here. That job is almost done, and I think it will wrap up soon."

🚨 JUST IN: Speaker Johnson says Iran better WATCH how many troops President Trump floods to the region and make a deal "The buildup of troops is very different than boots on the ground. We don't have boots on the ground. I don't think that's the intention, but I think Iran should WATCH that buildup, and they need to take note of that!" "They have to reopen the strait. They have to be good neighbors to their Middle East neighbors over there in the region." "They cannot have a nuclear warhead. They cannot have that capability. And they cannot declare war on the United States and Israel, which is what they did decades ago." "Our mission will be accomplished. I think that will wrap up in a short time period, and I know that's the intention of the administration and the Department of War." "We have the greatest, most powerful military fighting force ever conceived in the history of planet Earth." "It's an amazing, an amazing power that we have, and we willed it for good. We've done it here. That job is almost done, and I think it will wrap up soon."

Eric Daugherty

695,524 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio NAILS IT, says Iran is a threat to America ahead of negotiations tomorrow This is HIGH STAKES — Marco says Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are on their way RIGHT NOW. He also just briefed top leaders of Congress on Iran "They're not enriching right now, but they're trying to get the point where they ultimately can!" "Iran possesses a very large number of ballistic missiles, particularly short-range ballistic missiles, that threaten the United States and our bases in the region and our partners in the region and all of our bases in the UAE and Qatar and in Bahrain." "And they also possess naval assets that threaten shipping and try to threaten the U.S. Navy." "So I want everyone to understand that beyond just a nuclear program, they possess these conventional weapons that are solely designed to attack America and attack Americans if they so choose to do so." "The president was very clear last night that he always prefers diplomacy. But I want everyone to know that Iran poses a very great threat to the United States and has for a very long time."

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio NAILS IT, says Iran is a threat to America ahead of negotiations tomorrow This is HIGH STAKES — Marco says Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are on their way RIGHT NOW. He also just briefed top leaders of Congress on Iran "They're not enriching right now, but they're trying to get the point where they ultimately can!" "Iran possesses a very large number of ballistic missiles, particularly short-range ballistic missiles, that threaten the United States and our bases in the region and our partners in the region and all of our bases in the UAE and Qatar and in Bahrain." "And they also possess naval assets that threaten shipping and try to threaten the U.S. Navy." "So I want everyone to understand that beyond just a nuclear program, they possess these conventional weapons that are solely designed to attack America and attack Americans if they so choose to do so." "The president was very clear last night that he always prefers diplomacy. But I want everyone to know that Iran poses a very great threat to the United States and has for a very long time."

Eric Daugherty

478,918 次观看 • 7 个月前