Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨BREAKING: Sen. Chuck Schumer Says, “Donald Trump’s first 100 days can be defined by one big F-word: failure. Failure on the economy, lowering costs, tariffs, foreign policy, preserving democracy, failure on helping middle-class families.” What's your response to him?

278,151 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

7 Yorum

JaneDoeCitizen profil fotoğrafı
JaneDoeCitizen1 yıl önce

Yeah, keep arguing against reality, it's working wonders for your party approval rating. 😂😂🤣🤮🇺🇸

Merry profil fotoğrafı
Merry1 yıl önce

Schumer is a liar and a propagandist!

Steel city service profil fotoğrafı
Steel city service1 yıl önce

The only reason you’re saying it is a failure. Is because you’re no longer getting kickbacks. Truth be told.

FreeSpeech FreeMind profil fotoğrafı
FreeSpeech FreeMind1 yıl önce

Thx President Donald Trump for Making America Great Again.

AmericanSanityMagazine profil fotoğrafı
AmericanSanityMagazine1 yıl önce

Crazy old fart ain't he?

James M. Hewitt profil fotoğrafı
James M. Hewitt1 yıl önce

Schumer is the biggest LIAR in America. Can’t wait for midterms in 2026.

V.Streifel profil fotoğrafı
V.Streifel1 yıl önce

Lying a$$ ignorant fool. Demonrats are jealous because Trump is getting things done for the people of this country. Not taking from them like the Demonrats do!!

Benzer Videolar

Training to failure isn’t needed to max gains? Some people believe that you must take every set to failure in order to maximize muscle gains, but emerging literature suggests this may not be the case A new study examined training to failure vs stopping 1 to 2 reps shy of failure & found that the participants gained the same amount of muscle mass from both training styles There are several strengths to this study. First of all, they used a unilateral design where each participant was their own control by training one leg taking each set to failure and stopping 1-2 reps shy on the other. This helps negate any genetic induced differences since each person is acting as their own control Second, they matched training volumes to the participants previous volumes. This is a HUGE strength that is often overlooked in other studies Third, they used participants that were well trained (at least 3 years resistance training experience) Fourth, they had them all eat in a slight calorie surplus This adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating that training to absolute failure isn’t needed for gains & is likely counterproductive for optimal strength gains due to excess fatigue Interestingly, each group had no difference in total reps performed. That may seem strange when one group is going to failure but the other is stopping 1-2 reps shy. This can be explained by lower inter-set fatigue in the non failure group. For example if a failure group hits failure at 10 reps in set 1, they may only get 8 on the next set, and 6 on the next set. Whereas they might have been able to do 8 reps every set if they didn’t go to all out failure. As such, if you do train to failure I recommend only going to failure on your very last set of an exercise If you want to know how to implement this sort of programming make sure you check out the Biolayne Workoit Builder to get access to all my evidence based programs to help you get strong AF & build muscle 👊

Layne Norton, PhD

48,374 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce