Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 BREAKING: Senator Chuck Schumer UNDER DOJ INVESTIGATION for Threats Against Supreme Court Justices! 🚨 Schumer thought he was untouchable, but now his own words are coming back to haunt him. His 2020 threats against Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are now under DOJ review for possible judicial intimidation and...

f_leclerc20037's profile picture

Francois Leclerc

34,120 subscribers

19,373 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

cowboy81's profile picture
cowboy811 year ago

Schumer should face consequences but I have seen too many times that nothing ever happens to democrats only republicans, so I'm not expecting anything to happen to him.

Francois Leclerc's profile picture
Francois Leclerc1 year ago

I hate to say it, but you are right about that

The Liberation Project's profile picture
The Liberation Project1 year ago

𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝟏𝟎 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐒 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘰. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

BelannF's profile picture
BelannF1 year ago

Schummer should be held accountable for inciting a man to go to Kavanaugh's house to do away with him. If Trump is guilty of inciting J6 protestors, then Schumer is certainaly guilty of worse - Schummer didn't say anything like go peacefully and patriotically.

Stop Socialist Tyranny's profile picture
Stop Socialist Tyranny1 year ago

Schumer's threats against Supreme Court Justices were outrageous and unacceptable, now he's facing the consequences of his own actions. His attempts to intimidate justices undermine the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, it's about time he's held accountable. Justice will be served, and Schumer's arrogance will be his downfall, no one is above the law, not even Senate leaders.

I am Ken's profile picture
I am Ken1 year ago

Chucky thought he was untouchable. As senate leader, he could control a lot. He controlled McConnell too, so full coverage. Secondly, when was the last time a democrat has been prosecuted

Sir Kolbath's profile picture
Sir Kolbath1 year ago

If the American people could see just ONE of these long term scum get toppled it would boost morale and lead to an overwhelming exodus from the democrat party. The problem is that so many sheep believe democrats can do no wrong because they never get prosecuted. Getting AWAY with it is not the same as not DOING it. Hillary admitted a felony on national television… nothing. Newsom burned down his state… deflect to climate change. These people are never held accountable. If even ONE is, the cracks will show.

Robin G's profile picture
Robin G1 year ago

@ArchKennedy Considering it’s on video, there won’t need to be much of an investigation.

Katherine Brown's profile picture
Katherine Brown1 year ago

@feldonthecat ITS ABOUT TIME THESE CONTEMPTABLE "A"HOLES ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!!!

Eddie's profile picture
Eddie1 year ago

@PaulaRed62 What about this?

Croxxed Out's profile picture
Croxxed Out1 year ago

How did this guy get so rich and be hubristic enough to actually think he's untouchable. Guess he's going to find out those "ten ways from Sunday". Karma.

Related Videos

🚨 JUST IN: Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) just OBLITERATED Chuck Schumer for egging on violence against Supreme Court Justices "A senator stood in front of the Supreme Court building and called out 2 members BY NAME, saying they had 'released a whirlwind' and will 'PAY THE PRICE.'" "This [ENDANGERS] the lives of justices!" Chuck should resign. Conservative justices are facing HUGE threats.
0:28

🚨 JUST IN: Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) just OBLITERATED Chuck Schumer for egging on violence against Supreme Court Justices "A senator stood in front of the Supreme Court building and called out 2 members BY NAME, saying they had 'released a whirlwind' and will 'PAY THE PRICE.'" "This [ENDANGERS] the lives of justices!" Chuck should resign. Conservative justices are facing HUGE threats.

Eric Daugherty

194,444 views • 1 month ago

The Supreme Court is about to step into the spotlight as Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan make a rare appearance before Congress during a hearing on the Court’s proposed budget. Moments like this do not happen often, which is why Americans will be watching closely. The hearing also comes after years of escalating threats against Supreme Court justices, including protests outside their homes and the attempted assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Regardless of politics, no judge should be forced to serve under threats or intimidation. The Supreme Court exists to uphold the Constitution, not to bend under pressure from angry mobs or political activists. A nation that respects the rule of law must also protect those entrusted with defending it.
1:18

The Supreme Court is about to step into the spotlight as Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan make a rare appearance before Congress during a hearing on the Court’s proposed budget. Moments like this do not happen often, which is why Americans will be watching closely. The hearing also comes after years of escalating threats against Supreme Court justices, including protests outside their homes and the attempted assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Regardless of politics, no judge should be forced to serve under threats or intimidation. The Supreme Court exists to uphold the Constitution, not to bend under pressure from angry mobs or political activists. A nation that respects the rule of law must also protect those entrusted with defending it.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

50,899 views • 1 month ago

HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller just EXPOSED Chuck Schumer for inciting assassination attempts against conservative SCOTUS justices "Chuck Schumer infamously stood in front of the Supreme Court and issued a direct threat to our justices. After that threat was issued, we saw assassination attempts and violence against our justices!" 💯 "We saw the Merrick Garland Justice Department refuse to stop and prosecute and disband the groups that were illegally demonstrating outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices in violation of federal law." "It is against federal law to illegally demonstrate outside of the home of a judge to try to influence a ruling. It's the same group of people who have fanned the flames of assassination all over this country." "This administration under President Trump has moved heaven and earth to find the domestic extremists in this country who are trying to kidnap, murder, and assassinate and bring them to justice, while the left, being good communists, has done everything in their power to foment violence and foment hatred and foment unrest." "You will never get a cleaner contrast. You want safe streets. You want criminals behind bars. You want to support the police. You want to support law enforcement. That's President Trump." "The Democrats are the party of violence. President Trump is the president of law, order, and safety." Stephen Miller Eric Daughtry
1:17

HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller just EXPOSED Chuck Schumer for inciting assassination attempts against conservative SCOTUS justices "Chuck Schumer infamously stood in front of the Supreme Court and issued a direct threat to our justices. After that threat was issued, we saw assassination attempts and violence against our justices!" 💯 "We saw the Merrick Garland Justice Department refuse to stop and prosecute and disband the groups that were illegally demonstrating outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices in violation of federal law." "It is against federal law to illegally demonstrate outside of the home of a judge to try to influence a ruling. It's the same group of people who have fanned the flames of assassination all over this country." "This administration under President Trump has moved heaven and earth to find the domestic extremists in this country who are trying to kidnap, murder, and assassinate and bring them to justice, while the left, being good communists, has done everything in their power to foment violence and foment hatred and foment unrest." "You will never get a cleaner contrast. You want safe streets. You want criminals behind bars. You want to support the police. You want to support law enforcement. That's President Trump." "The Democrats are the party of violence. President Trump is the president of law, order, and safety." Stephen Miller Eric Daughtry

A Man Of Memes

49,085 views • 5 months ago

The New York Times reported on a private strategy discussion this weekend with Virginia House Democrats where they vented about the Virginia Supreme Court’s ruling tossing their new congressional map. One wild idea floated was lowering the justices’ retirement age to force them all off the court and pack it with new appointees. Nothing’s been acted on yet. It’s angry brainstorming right after a big loss. Democrats do feel they are above the law. If a Supreme Court ruling is unfavorable to them they try to find a way to replace the Supreme Court Justices on both State and Federal levels.
0:44

The New York Times reported on a private strategy discussion this weekend with Virginia House Democrats where they vented about the Virginia Supreme Court’s ruling tossing their new congressional map. One wild idea floated was lowering the justices’ retirement age to force them all off the court and pack it with new appointees. Nothing’s been acted on yet. It’s angry brainstorming right after a big loss. Democrats do feel they are above the law. If a Supreme Court ruling is unfavorable to them they try to find a way to replace the Supreme Court Justices on both State and Federal levels.

Patricia 🇺🇸

19,634 views • 3 months ago

Mollie Hemingway says she has evidence that dissenting Supreme Court justices in the Dobbs case deliberately stalled their opinions in a way that left other justices under prolonged security risk. “The moment that it leaked… you had immediate protests at the Supreme Court.” “You also had immediate protests at the homes of the Supreme Court justices themselves.” “Justices having to be moved to secure locations… they had to wear bulletproof vests.” “It was a very bad situation.” “And to make it worse, you had the Department of Justice… doing nothing.” “Protests at a federal judge’s house to get him or her to change their opinion… that’s against the law.” “You even had an assassin show up on Brett Kavanaugh's street.” “And I show how the liberal justices actually slow-walked their dissent…” “To prevent the Dobbs decision from being officially released.” “They were able to keep those justices under constant pressure for nearly two months.” Mollie
1:46

Mollie Hemingway says she has evidence that dissenting Supreme Court justices in the Dobbs case deliberately stalled their opinions in a way that left other justices under prolonged security risk. “The moment that it leaked… you had immediate protests at the Supreme Court.” “You also had immediate protests at the homes of the Supreme Court justices themselves.” “Justices having to be moved to secure locations… they had to wear bulletproof vests.” “It was a very bad situation.” “And to make it worse, you had the Department of Justice… doing nothing.” “Protests at a federal judge’s house to get him or her to change their opinion… that’s against the law.” “You even had an assassin show up on Brett Kavanaugh's street.” “And I show how the liberal justices actually slow-walked their dissent…” “To prevent the Dobbs decision from being officially released.” “They were able to keep those justices under constant pressure for nearly two months.” Mollie

Jan Jekielek

137,308 views • 3 months ago

Political violence in America is clearly not a "both sides" issue like we've heard over the past week. Just look at the Supreme Court. Mollie explains: “The liberal Justices, they literally go appear on Broadway. They go to award shows. They hobnob with celebrities, they travel all over the world, and they are celebrated for this. And then the conservative justices, they take ONE step out of their house, it's highly scrutinized. They’re still dealing with regular death threats, much more than people realize. You had left wing terror groups posting the home addresses of these Supreme Court justices, completely against the law, and NOTHING was done."
2:37

Political violence in America is clearly not a "both sides" issue like we've heard over the past week. Just look at the Supreme Court. Mollie explains: “The liberal Justices, they literally go appear on Broadway. They go to award shows. They hobnob with celebrities, they travel all over the world, and they are celebrated for this. And then the conservative justices, they take ONE step out of their house, it's highly scrutinized. They’re still dealing with regular death threats, much more than people realize. You had left wing terror groups posting the home addresses of these Supreme Court justices, completely against the law, and NOTHING was done."

Glenn Beck

31,837 views • 3 months ago

🔥 The fight over the Supreme Court is far from over—and the stakes have never been higher. Are attacks on conservative justices actually making the Court more committed to originalism? Has the push to pack the Supreme Court fundamentally changed the judicial landscape? I sat down with Carrie Severino for a must-listen conversation on the future of SCOTUS, the growing pressure campaign against the justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's evolving jurisprudence, religious liberty, presidential power, the Second Amendment, and why the Court's biggest decisions are still ahead. If you want to understand where the Supreme Court—and the country—is headed next, you won't want to miss this episode of The Truth with Lisa Boothe 🎧 Listen here:
3:54

🔥 The fight over the Supreme Court is far from over—and the stakes have never been higher. Are attacks on conservative justices actually making the Court more committed to originalism? Has the push to pack the Supreme Court fundamentally changed the judicial landscape? I sat down with Carrie Severino for a must-listen conversation on the future of SCOTUS, the growing pressure campaign against the justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's evolving jurisprudence, religious liberty, presidential power, the Second Amendment, and why the Court's biggest decisions are still ahead. If you want to understand where the Supreme Court—and the country—is headed next, you won't want to miss this episode of The Truth with Lisa Boothe 🎧 Listen here:

Lisa Boothe

29,056 views • 1 month ago

🚨 NOW: Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan just ripped President Trump for supposedly fanning VIOLENCE against justices Absolutely unreal. SEN. REED (D): *Reads Trump being critical of the Court* JUSTICE KAGAN: "These statements are really unhelpful, they're DANGEROUS in terms of individual justices' security." Kagan tried the "both sides" stipulation, but it was in specific response to Trump. How many MAGA are trying to SWAT and kill justices!? Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas face the WORST OF IT. POLITICAL VIOLENCE COMES FROM THE LEFT
1:22

🚨 NOW: Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan just ripped President Trump for supposedly fanning VIOLENCE against justices Absolutely unreal. SEN. REED (D): *Reads Trump being critical of the Court* JUSTICE KAGAN: "These statements are really unhelpful, they're DANGEROUS in terms of individual justices' security." Kagan tried the "both sides" stipulation, but it was in specific response to Trump. How many MAGA are trying to SWAT and kill justices!? Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas face the WORST OF IT. POLITICAL VIOLENCE COMES FROM THE LEFT

Eric Daugherty

232,712 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Supreme Court under siege: Leftist intimidation tactics exposed as Justices testify on security funding. Today’s hearings come after a blockbuster term where the Court smacked down Trump’s birthright citizenship push and limits on his regulatory power, proving they’re not a “MAGA rubber stamp” no matter how much Dems scream. Former DOJ official John Yoo nailed it: Death threats, swatting (Barrett), protests at conservative Justices’ homes (Alito, Kavanaugh, Thomas), gunman at Kavanaugh’s, threats to Roberts, all aimed at the constitutional conservatives. Zero against the liberal bloc. Schumer’s “whirlwind” warning? Classic intimidation. This isn’t organic outrage, it’s a coordinated campaign to bully the Court into partisan outcomes. Democrats rage about “threats to democracy” while pushing court-packing, term limits, and billionaire-gift bans to force results they want. Sound familiar? FDR tried the same power grab and failed. Real threat to the Constitution: Turning SCOTUS into a political tool instead of an independent check.
6:26

🚨 Supreme Court under siege: Leftist intimidation tactics exposed as Justices testify on security funding. Today’s hearings come after a blockbuster term where the Court smacked down Trump’s birthright citizenship push and limits on his regulatory power, proving they’re not a “MAGA rubber stamp” no matter how much Dems scream. Former DOJ official John Yoo nailed it: Death threats, swatting (Barrett), protests at conservative Justices’ homes (Alito, Kavanaugh, Thomas), gunman at Kavanaugh’s, threats to Roberts, all aimed at the constitutional conservatives. Zero against the liberal bloc. Schumer’s “whirlwind” warning? Classic intimidation. This isn’t organic outrage, it’s a coordinated campaign to bully the Court into partisan outcomes. Democrats rage about “threats to democracy” while pushing court-packing, term limits, and billionaire-gift bans to force results they want. Sound familiar? FDR tried the same power grab and failed. Real threat to the Constitution: Turning SCOTUS into a political tool instead of an independent check.

Gunther Eagleman™

80,744 views • 1 month ago

WATCH: Mollie on how liberal Supreme Court justices are turning to *shocking* tactics all because they are not getting what they want from the Court: “I have a new book out today, 'Alito,' which tells the behind-the-scenes story of what happened with the Dobbs leak. You are correct that we have seen this increase in bad relationships between the justices or problems with leaks. And the court really does need to operate without leaks so that they can get their work done. Justices throughout the history of the court have said how important it is that they can work without fear of this type of public discussion of the topics. It is an attempt to go after the court and to achieve results that people are not able to achieve through normal court procedures. That’s what we saw with the Dobbs leak, where in my book I showed the liberal justices actually delayed their dissent in the Dobbs decision after the leak intentionally, even though their colleagues were facing death threats, and we even had an assassination threat at Kavanaugh, and it’s what you see with the most recent leak from the New York Times — the liberal justices are not happy with what they are getting, they are not winning on the strength of their arguments, so you are seeing more and more of these politicized leaks.”
1:09

WATCH: Mollie on how liberal Supreme Court justices are turning to *shocking* tactics all because they are not getting what they want from the Court: “I have a new book out today, 'Alito,' which tells the behind-the-scenes story of what happened with the Dobbs leak. You are correct that we have seen this increase in bad relationships between the justices or problems with leaks. And the court really does need to operate without leaks so that they can get their work done. Justices throughout the history of the court have said how important it is that they can work without fear of this type of public discussion of the topics. It is an attempt to go after the court and to achieve results that people are not able to achieve through normal court procedures. That’s what we saw with the Dobbs leak, where in my book I showed the liberal justices actually delayed their dissent in the Dobbs decision after the leak intentionally, even though their colleagues were facing death threats, and we even had an assassination threat at Kavanaugh, and it’s what you see with the most recent leak from the New York Times — the liberal justices are not happy with what they are getting, they are not winning on the strength of their arguments, so you are seeing more and more of these politicized leaks.”

Conservative War Machine

677,709 views • 3 months ago

President Trump warned of the elected Democrats’ plans to pack the United States Supreme Court if they win the midterms: “I think if Democrats took control of the Congress, I believe that this country is finished… You will have Washington, D.C., and you’ll have Puerto Rico as a state, which would be a disaster… But they want to go to 21 Supreme Court justices.” Back in September we warned about the left’s plans to pack SCOTUS. The upcoming midterms are important!
1:09

President Trump warned of the elected Democrats’ plans to pack the United States Supreme Court if they win the midterms: “I think if Democrats took control of the Congress, I believe that this country is finished… You will have Washington, D.C., and you’ll have Puerto Rico as a state, which would be a disaster… But they want to go to 21 Supreme Court justices.” Back in September we warned about the left’s plans to pack SCOTUS. The upcoming midterms are important!

Loomer Unleashed

107,577 views • 2 months ago

Here is: The leader of the Left responding to Charlie Kirk’s assassination—only after threatening two U.S. Supreme Court Justices with the consequence of a violent attack from an angry Left: “You will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you!” Chuck Schumer : “Political violence has no place in America. This shooting is horrifying, and I’m praying for Charlie Kirk and his family.”
0:21

Here is: The leader of the Left responding to Charlie Kirk’s assassination—only after threatening two U.S. Supreme Court Justices with the consequence of a violent attack from an angry Left: “You will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you!” Chuck Schumer : “Political violence has no place in America. This shooting is horrifying, and I’m praying for Charlie Kirk and his family.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

3,275,887 views • 11 months ago

🚨 NOW: Stephen Miller sounds the alarm that leftists are repeatedly plotting massive violence attempts on conservative US Supreme Court justices to influence rulings Amy Coney Barrett is a PRIME EXAMPLE of who they are swaying! "Clear threats of violence against our Supreme Court to try to shape how they rule on upcoming decisions. The leftist does this with the full desire, intent, and understanding that the threat of violence against a public figure or their family is meant to cal them into behaving or acting or conducting themselves differently."
0:32

🚨 NOW: Stephen Miller sounds the alarm that leftists are repeatedly plotting massive violence attempts on conservative US Supreme Court justices to influence rulings Amy Coney Barrett is a PRIME EXAMPLE of who they are swaying! "Clear threats of violence against our Supreme Court to try to shape how they rule on upcoming decisions. The leftist does this with the full desire, intent, and understanding that the threat of violence against a public figure or their family is meant to cal them into behaving or acting or conducting themselves differently."

Eric Daugherty

40,836 views • 1 month ago

🚨 NOW: President Trump expects the Supreme Court to UPHOLD birthright citizenship for illegal aliens, saying his own nominees are GOING AGAINST US SCOTUS MUST do the right thing! "Now they have birthright citizenship. They'll probably rule AGAINST us!" "Supreme Court could have helped us...no country in the world has it. It's horrible for our country. And I just see it, you know? I see some of these [justices] that are nominated by me asking real BAD questions!" "And looks like maybe we're gonna lose that one too."
1:27

🚨 NOW: President Trump expects the Supreme Court to UPHOLD birthright citizenship for illegal aliens, saying his own nominees are GOING AGAINST US SCOTUS MUST do the right thing! "Now they have birthright citizenship. They'll probably rule AGAINST us!" "Supreme Court could have helped us...no country in the world has it. It's horrible for our country. And I just see it, you know? I see some of these [justices] that are nominated by me asking real BAD questions!" "And looks like maybe we're gonna lose that one too."

Eric Daugherty

363,807 views • 3 months ago

President Trump just announced he will be going to the Supreme Court tomorrow to hear the case on birthright citizenship. He then proceeded to destroy some of the Supreme Court justices, including his own appointees: “I love a few of them. I don’t like some others… say what you want but you have the ones that were appointed by Barack Hussein Obama and Biden - I don’t care how good your case is, you could have the greatest case ever. They’re gonna rule against you. They always do. And it’s not supposed to be that way. Now the Republicans tend to be very different. They wanna show how honorable they are [sarcasm]. So a man can appoint them and they can rule against him, and sooo proud of it. ‘We’re so proud we ruled against Trump!’” It really is a shame, but he is right. The lib justices always fall in line, but Trump always has to worry about how the justices that he himself appointed are going to vote. This man faces resistance at every turn, but somehow he always wins. It’s really incredible to watch.
2:15

President Trump just announced he will be going to the Supreme Court tomorrow to hear the case on birthright citizenship. He then proceeded to destroy some of the Supreme Court justices, including his own appointees: “I love a few of them. I don’t like some others… say what you want but you have the ones that were appointed by Barack Hussein Obama and Biden - I don’t care how good your case is, you could have the greatest case ever. They’re gonna rule against you. They always do. And it’s not supposed to be that way. Now the Republicans tend to be very different. They wanna show how honorable they are [sarcasm]. So a man can appoint them and they can rule against him, and sooo proud of it. ‘We’re so proud we ruled against Trump!’” It really is a shame, but he is right. The lib justices always fall in line, but Trump always has to worry about how the justices that he himself appointed are going to vote. This man faces resistance at every turn, but somehow he always wins. It’s really incredible to watch.

TheStormHasArrived

31,016 views • 4 months ago

Pam Bondi says that nobody is above the law and people will be held accountable for their actions 💥 “We are investigating so many things at the DOJ… What they did to President Trump, what they tried to do to his family, no longer. Weaponization has ended and no one in this country is above the law and people will be held accountable for their actions.” Now we are talkin!!!
1:15

Pam Bondi says that nobody is above the law and people will be held accountable for their actions 💥 “We are investigating so many things at the DOJ… What they did to President Trump, what they tried to do to his family, no longer. Weaponization has ended and no one in this country is above the law and people will be held accountable for their actions.” Now we are talkin!!!

TheStormHasArrived

74,993 views • 1 year ago

🚨 NOW: President Trump RAGES at the Supreme Court, saying we are likely to LOSE the birthright citizenship case "TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER!" 🔥 "Wacko James Carville, a so-called Democrat “strategist,” wants the Democrats to make D.C. and Puerto Rico States and, most importantly, pack the Supreme Court, putting 13 Justices on the Court. Other Dems want 21 Justices." "They are already doing great with the Supreme Court, however. The Democrat Justices stick together like glue, totally loyal to the people and ideology that got them there. They are an immovable force, and there is nothing that can be done to change that." "Frankly, I respect that, a lot! Certain Republican Appointees let the Democrats push them around, always wanting to be popular, politically correct, or even worse, wanting to show how “independent” they are, with very little loyalty to the man who appointed them or, more importantly, the ideology from which they came to be Nominated and Confirmed." "Everyone knows that, as an example, Birthright Citizenship, which is Unconditional and Absent from any other developed or successful Country, is a disaster for the United States of America." "No Country can be successful with such an anchor wrapped firmly around its neck but, based on the questioning by Republican Nominated Justices that I watched firsthand in the Court, we lose." "As another example, if the Supreme Court put in one sentence stating that any money paid in Tariffs to the United States of America, to this point, does not have to be returned (to many people who hate our Country!), they would have saved American Taxpayers a minimum of $159 Billion Dollars." "All they had to do was read the Dissent, written by Justice Kavanaugh, it was a close call, it wasn’t a 9-0 decision — What a difference it would have made for our Country. I put certain people on the United States Supreme Court who totally misrepresented who they were, and the true ideology for which they stand!"
1:09

🚨 NOW: President Trump RAGES at the Supreme Court, saying we are likely to LOSE the birthright citizenship case "TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER!" 🔥 "Wacko James Carville, a so-called Democrat “strategist,” wants the Democrats to make D.C. and Puerto Rico States and, most importantly, pack the Supreme Court, putting 13 Justices on the Court. Other Dems want 21 Justices." "They are already doing great with the Supreme Court, however. The Democrat Justices stick together like glue, totally loyal to the people and ideology that got them there. They are an immovable force, and there is nothing that can be done to change that." "Frankly, I respect that, a lot! Certain Republican Appointees let the Democrats push them around, always wanting to be popular, politically correct, or even worse, wanting to show how “independent” they are, with very little loyalty to the man who appointed them or, more importantly, the ideology from which they came to be Nominated and Confirmed." "Everyone knows that, as an example, Birthright Citizenship, which is Unconditional and Absent from any other developed or successful Country, is a disaster for the United States of America." "No Country can be successful with such an anchor wrapped firmly around its neck but, based on the questioning by Republican Nominated Justices that I watched firsthand in the Court, we lose." "As another example, if the Supreme Court put in one sentence stating that any money paid in Tariffs to the United States of America, to this point, does not have to be returned (to many people who hate our Country!), they would have saved American Taxpayers a minimum of $159 Billion Dollars." "All they had to do was read the Dissent, written by Justice Kavanaugh, it was a close call, it wasn’t a 9-0 decision — What a difference it would have made for our Country. I put certain people on the United States Supreme Court who totally misrepresented who they were, and the true ideology for which they stand!"

Eric Daugherty

117,384 views • 3 months ago

.Mollie: “Every [Supreme Court Justice] hires their own clerks—law students from elite law schools who serve a one-year term… For Justices Thomas and Alito, they're picking people who understand there is this battle for the country, for the Constitution. And Justice Alito wants people who are not going to just cash out at the end of their clerkship. He wants them to also be part of this effort.”
1:42

.Mollie: “Every [Supreme Court Justice] hires their own clerks—law students from elite law schools who serve a one-year term… For Justices Thomas and Alito, they're picking people who understand there is this battle for the country, for the Constitution. And Justice Alito wants people who are not going to just cash out at the end of their clerkship. He wants them to also be part of this effort.”

The Independent with Scott Atlas

85,522 views • 1 month ago

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.
3:34

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,408 views • 6 months ago