Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

BREAKING: Senior Meta Engineer Reveals Anti-Kamala Posts Are "Automatically Demoted,” Admits Shadowbanning Tactics "Say your uncle in Ohio said something about Kamala Harris is unfit to be a president because she doesn't have a child, that kind of sh*t is automatically demoted,” reveals Meta Senior Software Engineer, Jeevan Gyawali...

JamesOKeefeIII's profile picture

James O'Keefe

3,560,515 subscribers

36,663,860 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

James O'Keefe profil fotoğrafı
James O'Keefe1 yıl önce

James O'Keefe contacted Jeevan Gyawali to request comment regarding hidden camera footage in which Gyawali discusses Meta's censorship practices. Upon hearing the details, Gyawali responded, "Ah, f*ck," before quickly ending the call. His comment speaks for itself.

Wall Street Apes profil fotoğrafı
Wall Street Apes1 yıl önce

This is blatant ELECTION INTERFERENCE. Mark Zuckerberg and everyone involved belongs in prison. META is doing exactly what they did in 2020 all over again. Rigging elections is the purest form of treason and everyone involved should share the punishment that carries

Shem Horne profil fotoğrafı
Shem Horne1 yıl önce

It can't be overstated how big of a deal it was that Elon Musk bought this website and stopped the mass censorship chokehold the left had on all of big tech. Huge.

MtnGirl profil fotoğrafı
MtnGirl1 yıl önce

Obviously Zuckerberg hasn’t learned his lesson, and his apology letter to the @GOPoversight meant nothing. @Jim_Jordan are you going to hold Zuckerberg accountable this time?

Expose Them profil fotoğrafı
Expose Them1 yıl önce

I knew Zuckercuck was just trying to save face by pretending he was sorry for all the censorship last cycle. Trump needs to follow through and throw him in prison.

Muff’s 🌎 profil fotoğrafı
Muff’s 🌎1 yıl önce

Yes I couldn’t post this on FB. I tried this three times. But I could put it as a story.

PO𝕏 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
PO𝕏 🇺🇸1 yıl önce

O'Keefe just made history, congrats!

Merissa Hansen profil fotoğrafı
Merissa Hansen1 yıl önce

Weird that Mark Zuckerberg “was all in for Trump” yet his company is still involved with election interference….

Catarina Van Beest profil fotoğrafı
Catarina Van Beest1 yıl önce

@disclosetv This is happening on X too. If I mention her, that post is buried @X @elonmusk you have traitors in your ranks.

Ashton Forbes profil fotoğrafı
Ashton Forbes1 yıl önce

Honeypot some Reddit admins next, I want to get proof of their corruption.

Benzer Videolar

BREAKING: Second Round of Meta Engineers Reveal Censorship Practices: “Pro-Trump” Posts “Go Just Up to Another Team to Take It Down" “Usually the disinformation we saw was pro-Trump... We'll investigate, and then it goes just up to another team to take it [the post] down,” admits Matthew Fowler (@mattsfowler), a Software Engineering Manager at Meta, during an undercover date with an O’Keefe Media Group journalist. Fowler emphasized that Meta’s investigations often rely on mainstream media for verification, stating, “The news is going to do their job, and then based on what the outlets say… you have to trust that.” Plamen Dzhelepov (@PlamenDzhelepov), a Machine Learning Engineer at Meta, agreed, “Meta has the right to suppress anything,” acknowledging the company’s political bias by noting, “they're biased if they do that against the Republicans.” Dzhelepov detailed Meta’s censorship capabilities, confirming they target “crazy conspiracy right-wing people,” actively demoting their opinions. Michael Zoorob (@MichaelZoorob), a Data Scientist at Meta, described the fact-checking process, stating, “the fundamental problem is that... the vast majority of what fact-checkers label as false is shared by conservatives,” admitting that any policy demoting content labeled false by fact-checkers disproportionately affects conservatives. When addressing misinformation, Dzhelepov explained Meta's approach: “it's either censored or it says a [community note] thing, where it says, 'this is disinformation, it's probably fake' under the post," adding that Meta “actually suppresses certain voices.” Zoorob also recalled how Meta had downranked the Hunter Biden laptop story upon the FBI's warning, stating, “We just downranked it,” making the post less visible in users' feeds.” MetaNewsroom Mark Zuckerberg Andy Stone
7:56

BREAKING: Second Round of Meta Engineers Reveal Censorship Practices: “Pro-Trump” Posts “Go Just Up to Another Team to Take It Down" “Usually the disinformation we saw was pro-Trump... We'll investigate, and then it goes just up to another team to take it [the post] down,” admits Matthew Fowler (@mattsfowler), a Software Engineering Manager at Meta, during an undercover date with an O’Keefe Media Group journalist. Fowler emphasized that Meta’s investigations often rely on mainstream media for verification, stating, “The news is going to do their job, and then based on what the outlets say… you have to trust that.” Plamen Dzhelepov (@PlamenDzhelepov), a Machine Learning Engineer at Meta, agreed, “Meta has the right to suppress anything,” acknowledging the company’s political bias by noting, “they're biased if they do that against the Republicans.” Dzhelepov detailed Meta’s censorship capabilities, confirming they target “crazy conspiracy right-wing people,” actively demoting their opinions. Michael Zoorob (@MichaelZoorob), a Data Scientist at Meta, described the fact-checking process, stating, “the fundamental problem is that... the vast majority of what fact-checkers label as false is shared by conservatives,” admitting that any policy demoting content labeled false by fact-checkers disproportionately affects conservatives. When addressing misinformation, Dzhelepov explained Meta's approach: “it's either censored or it says a [community note] thing, where it says, 'this is disinformation, it's probably fake' under the post," adding that Meta “actually suppresses certain voices.” Zoorob also recalled how Meta had downranked the Hunter Biden laptop story upon the FBI's warning, stating, “We just downranked it,” making the post less visible in users' feeds.” MetaNewsroom Mark Zuckerberg Andy Stone

James O'Keefe

1,314,862 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

IMAGINE MARK ZUCKERBERG IS RIGHT: In a recent interview with Complex, Zuckerberg talks about the future of the Meta glasses He talks about the transition from flip phones to smart phones, when smart phones came out it was clear that in 5 years all flip phones would become them He used this same concept on glasses. Billions of people wear glasses if that is for actual need or even sunglasses, and now technological infused glasses are coming out and who is the leader in it? Mark Zuckerberg and Meta What if Zuckerberg is right and in 5 years from now it will be the norm to have some level of technology in your eyewear? $META would go to a whole new level if that event played out
0:36

IMAGINE MARK ZUCKERBERG IS RIGHT: In a recent interview with Complex, Zuckerberg talks about the future of the Meta glasses He talks about the transition from flip phones to smart phones, when smart phones came out it was clear that in 5 years all flip phones would become them He used this same concept on glasses. Billions of people wear glasses if that is for actual need or even sunglasses, and now technological infused glasses are coming out and who is the leader in it? Mark Zuckerberg and Meta What if Zuckerberg is right and in 5 years from now it will be the norm to have some level of technology in your eyewear? $META would go to a whole new level if that event played out

dray

12,466 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Today I’m announcing a major multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit against Meta, the owner of Facebook & Instagram. The case is WILD and has implications for ALL OF US. On top of falsely calling me a criminal, Meta suggested my kids be taken from me. Here’s a summary of events: This all started with Meta’s AI falsely claiming that I was charged with a crime from January 6th but… I wasn’t even in DC that day (I was in TN) and I’ve never been charged with a crime IN MY LIFE. We found this out in August of 2024 when I was exposing woke policies at Harley Davidson. One dealership was unhappy with me and they posted a screenshot from Meta’s AI in an effort to attack me. This screenshot was filled with lies. I couldn’t believe it was real so I checked myself. It was even worse when I checked. From that day I’ve faced a steady stream of false accusations that are deeply damaging to my character and the safety of my family. This sounds bad, right? It gets MUCH worse. Meta was notified LAST YEAR by my lawyers, yet the defamation continues today. Some lies Meta spread about me: • Meta’s AI claims that I’ve appeared on Nick Fuentes show, that I’ve spoken at his rallies, and that I’ve supported him. I’ve never met him and this is all false. • Meta’s AI claims I’ve engaged in Holocaust denial. I’ve NEVER denied the Holocaust. • Meta’s AI tells advertisers NOT to advertise with me because of the lies it invented. • Meta tells employers NOT to hire me because of the lies it invented. • Meta suggested that MY KIDS BE TAKEN FROM ME because it would be better for them to be raised by someone more friendly to DEI and transgenderism. • Meta’s ironically claimed that I’ve been sued for DEFAMATION and EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. I’ve never been sued for either. I’ve tried to fix this privately since last year. Instead of fixing this and instituting safeguards, Meta has given us the runaround. Meta later BLACKLISTED my name from being searched (insane) but it didn’t end the defamation because Meta includes my name in news stories. You can then ask for more info about me. If you do that, Meta goes back to defaming me. In fact, the lies this week are the worst yet! Meta’s AI admits that a false accusation over J6 is extremely harmful to whoever is accused. It even agrees that a court is LIKELY to rule that this was defamation with ACTUAL MALICE. With my lawsuit today, I intend to MAKE Mark Zuckerberg Meta solve this problem. Why is this so important? While I’m the target today, a candidate you like could be the next target, and lies from Meta’s AI could flip votes that decide the election. YOU could be the next target too. That’s why I’m taking on this David vs. Goliath fight. For me, my honor, my family, for our elections, and FOR YOU! If you want to help me fight ALL the battles that I’m fighting, you can help support my team at Timecodes: (0:00) Intro (0:40) Announcing Meta Lawsuit (2:01) Video of Meta’s AI Defaming Me (03:24) Meta’s AI Tells People Not To Hire or Advertise With Me (04:30) How This All Started (05:35) Trying Meta’s AI Myself — Meta Claims I Was Charged With A Crime (06:06) Meta Says I Support Nick Fuentes (06:45) Meta Says I’m A Holocaust Denier (07:07) Meta’s AI Admits Courts Will Likely Find What They Did To Be Malicious (08:08) The Threat To Our Elections (09:11) More Defamation (09:27) Were Meta’s Lies Used In A Corporate Intelligence Report? (10:36) Meta’s AI Says They Need To Apologize And Institute Safeguards (11:15) Meta Admits Their Lies Have Damaged My Reputation (11:30) Our Legal Communication since 2024 (12:28) Meta Blacklists My Name + How It Lies (14:08) Meta Suggests Authorities Take My Kids Away Because I Pose A "Threat To Their Wellbeing" (16:00) Meta Asks Me For PR Help 😳 (16:31) The Consequences Of Lying AI (17:39) Threats and An Arrest Of A Man Who Wanted To Kill Me (18:30) Closing Argument (19:07) Introducing My New Show
19:58

Today I’m announcing a major multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit against Meta, the owner of Facebook & Instagram. The case is WILD and has implications for ALL OF US. On top of falsely calling me a criminal, Meta suggested my kids be taken from me. Here’s a summary of events: This all started with Meta’s AI falsely claiming that I was charged with a crime from January 6th but… I wasn’t even in DC that day (I was in TN) and I’ve never been charged with a crime IN MY LIFE. We found this out in August of 2024 when I was exposing woke policies at Harley Davidson. One dealership was unhappy with me and they posted a screenshot from Meta’s AI in an effort to attack me. This screenshot was filled with lies. I couldn’t believe it was real so I checked myself. It was even worse when I checked. From that day I’ve faced a steady stream of false accusations that are deeply damaging to my character and the safety of my family. This sounds bad, right? It gets MUCH worse. Meta was notified LAST YEAR by my lawyers, yet the defamation continues today. Some lies Meta spread about me: • Meta’s AI claims that I’ve appeared on Nick Fuentes show, that I’ve spoken at his rallies, and that I’ve supported him. I’ve never met him and this is all false. • Meta’s AI claims I’ve engaged in Holocaust denial. I’ve NEVER denied the Holocaust. • Meta’s AI tells advertisers NOT to advertise with me because of the lies it invented. • Meta tells employers NOT to hire me because of the lies it invented. • Meta suggested that MY KIDS BE TAKEN FROM ME because it would be better for them to be raised by someone more friendly to DEI and transgenderism. • Meta’s ironically claimed that I’ve been sued for DEFAMATION and EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. I’ve never been sued for either. I’ve tried to fix this privately since last year. Instead of fixing this and instituting safeguards, Meta has given us the runaround. Meta later BLACKLISTED my name from being searched (insane) but it didn’t end the defamation because Meta includes my name in news stories. You can then ask for more info about me. If you do that, Meta goes back to defaming me. In fact, the lies this week are the worst yet! Meta’s AI admits that a false accusation over J6 is extremely harmful to whoever is accused. It even agrees that a court is LIKELY to rule that this was defamation with ACTUAL MALICE. With my lawsuit today, I intend to MAKE Mark Zuckerberg Meta solve this problem. Why is this so important? While I’m the target today, a candidate you like could be the next target, and lies from Meta’s AI could flip votes that decide the election. YOU could be the next target too. That’s why I’m taking on this David vs. Goliath fight. For me, my honor, my family, for our elections, and FOR YOU! If you want to help me fight ALL the battles that I’m fighting, you can help support my team at Timecodes: (0:00) Intro (0:40) Announcing Meta Lawsuit (2:01) Video of Meta’s AI Defaming Me (03:24) Meta’s AI Tells People Not To Hire or Advertise With Me (04:30) How This All Started (05:35) Trying Meta’s AI Myself — Meta Claims I Was Charged With A Crime (06:06) Meta Says I Support Nick Fuentes (06:45) Meta Says I’m A Holocaust Denier (07:07) Meta’s AI Admits Courts Will Likely Find What They Did To Be Malicious (08:08) The Threat To Our Elections (09:11) More Defamation (09:27) Were Meta’s Lies Used In A Corporate Intelligence Report? (10:36) Meta’s AI Says They Need To Apologize And Institute Safeguards (11:15) Meta Admits Their Lies Have Damaged My Reputation (11:30) Our Legal Communication since 2024 (12:28) Meta Blacklists My Name + How It Lies (14:08) Meta Suggests Authorities Take My Kids Away Because I Pose A "Threat To Their Wellbeing" (16:00) Meta Asks Me For PR Help 😳 (16:31) The Consequences Of Lying AI (17:39) Threats and An Arrest Of A Man Who Wanted To Kill Me (18:30) Closing Argument (19:07) Introducing My New Show

Robby Starbuck

3,720,314 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This is North Korea level shit. Giving Mark Zuckerberg a three day ultimatum to apologise over the removal of the Prime Minister’s video, and threatening to withdraw Meta’s legal protections if he doesn’t, is an astonishing abuse of power. This is what happens when a government becomes so fragile that even an unintended slight is treated as an attack on the nation. The message is clear: question, criticise, or even make an honest mistake involving one man, and there will be consequences. No individual, not even the Prime Minister, should ever become bigger than the nation. That’s not how a democracy is supposed to function. Meta Mark Zuckerberg
0:45

This is North Korea level shit. Giving Mark Zuckerberg a three day ultimatum to apologise over the removal of the Prime Minister’s video, and threatening to withdraw Meta’s legal protections if he doesn’t, is an astonishing abuse of power. This is what happens when a government becomes so fragile that even an unintended slight is treated as an attack on the nation. The message is clear: question, criticise, or even make an honest mistake involving one man, and there will be consequences. No individual, not even the Prime Minister, should ever become bigger than the nation. That’s not how a democracy is supposed to function. Meta Mark Zuckerberg

pranav pradhi

16,290 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

#WATCH | Delhi: After chairing the meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications & IT, Committee Chairman and BJP MP Dr Nishikant Dubey said, "...The second question is that Meta India removed the Prime Minister's content. This is not the first time Meta India has done this. If you recall, Zuckerberg himself made a statement in January regarding the 2024 elections and later apologized. This shows that his intention is to destabilise the country. When a video of the Prime Minister of India can be removed, and they themselves admitted that the content was missing for five hours, from 12:30 am to 5:00 am, this is a very serious matter. Our committee has said two things and has clearly stated that the apology should come from Zuckerberg. If Zuckerberg does not give it, then the safe harbour protection under Section 79 should be withdrawn from him. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) is another issue. YouTube also has that content. Meta also has that content, and they do not remove content related to child abuse. They do not remove content related to women. Both these rules of the Government of India are very strict, and on top of that, they do not listen to the Home Ministry. They do not listen to the IT Ministry either. So, we have said that in all these matters, and in many other matters, you know that the Chief Minister of the Congress government of Telangana has filed an FIR against Meta India. We have said that safe harbour should be removed in all these matters..."
2:23

#WATCH | Delhi: After chairing the meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications & IT, Committee Chairman and BJP MP Dr Nishikant Dubey said, "...The second question is that Meta India removed the Prime Minister's content. This is not the first time Meta India has done this. If you recall, Zuckerberg himself made a statement in January regarding the 2024 elections and later apologized. This shows that his intention is to destabilise the country. When a video of the Prime Minister of India can be removed, and they themselves admitted that the content was missing for five hours, from 12:30 am to 5:00 am, this is a very serious matter. Our committee has said two things and has clearly stated that the apology should come from Zuckerberg. If Zuckerberg does not give it, then the safe harbour protection under Section 79 should be withdrawn from him. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) is another issue. YouTube also has that content. Meta also has that content, and they do not remove content related to child abuse. They do not remove content related to women. Both these rules of the Government of India are very strict, and on top of that, they do not listen to the Home Ministry. They do not listen to the IT Ministry either. So, we have said that in all these matters, and in many other matters, you know that the Chief Minister of the Congress government of Telangana has filed an FIR against Meta India. We have said that safe harbour should be removed in all these matters..."

ANI

55,478 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

Mark Zuckerberg reveals the hiring rule he uses at Meta "I have this hiring heuristic at Meta: I will only hire someone to work for me if I could see myself working for them. Not that I want them to run the company, but in an alternate universe, if it was their company, would I be happy to go work for them?" "Everyone always says don't compromise on quality, but there's this question of how do you know someone is good enough. My answer is: I would want someone on my team if I would work for them"
0:45

Mark Zuckerberg reveals the hiring rule he uses at Meta "I have this hiring heuristic at Meta: I will only hire someone to work for me if I could see myself working for them. Not that I want them to run the company, but in an alternate universe, if it was their company, would I be happy to go work for them?" "Everyone always says don't compromise on quality, but there's this question of how do you know someone is good enough. My answer is: I would want someone on my team if I would work for them"

Jaynit

221,375 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta: "The average American has fewer than three friends. And the average person has demand for meaningfully more, like 15." He said it flatly, as the setup for his real point: people are going to have relationships with AI. Not use it. Have relationships with it. AI friends, AI therapists, and yes, the other kind too. His logic is hard to argue with, and darker than it sounds. People are lonelier than they want to be. The demand for connection is already there, unmet. So Meta is building AI companions that remember you, talk back in real time, and with their Codec Avatars, "feel like a real person" on an always-on video call. We spent a decade afraid AI would take our jobs. Nobody asked whether it would take our friends. And the unsettling part is, for a lot of people, it might feel better.
2:07

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta: "The average American has fewer than three friends. And the average person has demand for meaningfully more, like 15." He said it flatly, as the setup for his real point: people are going to have relationships with AI. Not use it. Have relationships with it. AI friends, AI therapists, and yes, the other kind too. His logic is hard to argue with, and darker than it sounds. People are lonelier than they want to be. The demand for connection is already there, unmet. So Meta is building AI companions that remember you, talk back in real time, and with their Codec Avatars, "feel like a real person" on an always-on video call. We spent a decade afraid AI would take our jobs. Nobody asked whether it would take our friends. And the unsettling part is, for a lot of people, it might feel better.

Casper

259,435 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

This can be the superpower of the Neural Band that Meta is giving together with the Ray-Ban Meta Display glasses. The video shows an old prototype bracelet by CTRL+LABS, the startup acquired by Meta and whose technology was used to develop the Neural Band. At the beginning of the video, the guy makes an action (a keyboard key press) with his hands, then the bracelet can substitute the key pressure, and at the end of the video, the guy doesn't even have to do the action; it is just sufficient that he "thinks" about it. As long as the brain is sending an electric message to the fingers, the full action is not necessary anymore. Just an "intention" to move them is necessary. If the Neural Band is evolved to this stage, and the users are educated to this, potentially, we may not even need to perform air taps or writing gestures, but we could just think about doing them. This would reduce a lot of the fatigue of using XR devices and the weirdness of using them on the street. Then why isn't this feature available today? I guess that the reason is twofold. First of all, we have accuracy: the full gesture is easier to detect for the system. Many people (me included) are praising the accuracy of the Neural Band, and this is amazing, because an input mechanism should have a reliability close to 100%. Then we, as users, have never been trained to just "think" about actions: it would feel weird and hard to learn. I think we should undergo some training to learn how to do this "thinking" operation properly. I hope that something like this could come in the upcoming years... that would be the real game-changer paradigm if compared to the camera-based tracking.
0:26

This can be the superpower of the Neural Band that Meta is giving together with the Ray-Ban Meta Display glasses. The video shows an old prototype bracelet by CTRL+LABS, the startup acquired by Meta and whose technology was used to develop the Neural Band. At the beginning of the video, the guy makes an action (a keyboard key press) with his hands, then the bracelet can substitute the key pressure, and at the end of the video, the guy doesn't even have to do the action; it is just sufficient that he "thinks" about it. As long as the brain is sending an electric message to the fingers, the full action is not necessary anymore. Just an "intention" to move them is necessary. If the Neural Band is evolved to this stage, and the users are educated to this, potentially, we may not even need to perform air taps or writing gestures, but we could just think about doing them. This would reduce a lot of the fatigue of using XR devices and the weirdness of using them on the street. Then why isn't this feature available today? I guess that the reason is twofold. First of all, we have accuracy: the full gesture is easier to detect for the system. Many people (me included) are praising the accuracy of the Neural Band, and this is amazing, because an input mechanism should have a reliability close to 100%. Then we, as users, have never been trained to just "think" about actions: it would feel weird and hard to learn. I think we should undergo some training to learn how to do this "thinking" operation properly. I hope that something like this could come in the upcoming years... that would be the real game-changer paradigm if compared to the camera-based tracking.

TonyVT SkarredGhost

11,805 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

BREAKING: MSNBC Producer Admits MSNBC Is 'Doing All They Can to Help’ the Harris Campaign During an undercover date with an OMG journalist, Basel Hamdan (Basel Hamdan), a writer and producer for MSNBC’s show “Ayman,” (AYMAN) was asked what the network has done to assist the Kamala Harris campaign. Hamdan revealed on hidden camera that “what her [Harris’s] message of the day is, is their message of the day,” as MSNBC actively pushes Harris’s narrative to help her win. He admitted that MSNBC is doing “all they can to help,” Harris get elected, with the network operating as an extension of the campaign. He went on to say, "MSNBC is indistinguishable from the party," further highlighting their partisan agenda. In discussing the relationships between the MSNBC hosts and Democratic politicians, Hamdan reveals, ”The anchor and the politician are just in total agreement about everything.” He adds, “If you watch an interview with a Democratic politician, they just finish each other's sentences.” Hamdan also didn’t shy away from criticizing the network’s audience, stating, “They’ve made their viewers dumber over the years,” and explaining that MSNBC is “too cozy with Democratic politicians.” Ayman MSNBCPR Kamala Harris Vice President JD Vance @KamalaHQ
11:46

BREAKING: MSNBC Producer Admits MSNBC Is 'Doing All They Can to Help’ the Harris Campaign During an undercover date with an OMG journalist, Basel Hamdan (Basel Hamdan), a writer and producer for MSNBC’s show “Ayman,” (AYMAN) was asked what the network has done to assist the Kamala Harris campaign. Hamdan revealed on hidden camera that “what her [Harris’s] message of the day is, is their message of the day,” as MSNBC actively pushes Harris’s narrative to help her win. He admitted that MSNBC is doing “all they can to help,” Harris get elected, with the network operating as an extension of the campaign. He went on to say, "MSNBC is indistinguishable from the party," further highlighting their partisan agenda. In discussing the relationships between the MSNBC hosts and Democratic politicians, Hamdan reveals, ”The anchor and the politician are just in total agreement about everything.” He adds, “If you watch an interview with a Democratic politician, they just finish each other's sentences.” Hamdan also didn’t shy away from criticizing the network’s audience, stating, “They’ve made their viewers dumber over the years,” and explaining that MSNBC is “too cozy with Democratic politicians.” Ayman MSNBCPR Kamala Harris Vice President JD Vance @KamalaHQ

James O'Keefe

30,616,214 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Mark Zuckerberg was asked to describe the business AI agent opportunity at $META. The answer is worth paying attention to. A few things that stood out: 💸 The end goal for advertising: any business comes with an objective and a budget — $META delivers the results. Zuck calls it “the ultimate business results machine.” 📈 Advertising has historically been ~1% of global GDP — but that includes enormous inefficiency. As it transforms into an AI-driven results machine, that share grows. 🤖 Every business will have an AI agent living in messaging platforms handling customer support and sales. Thailand and Vietnam are already the proof of concept — and they’re META’s 10th and 11th revenue countries despite ranking in the 30s by global GDP. 💬 WhatsApp, from a revenue perspective, is just getting started. ___ 🎙️ YouTube: Stripe | A conversation with Mark Zuckerberg (05/08/2025)
3:46

Mark Zuckerberg was asked to describe the business AI agent opportunity at $META. The answer is worth paying attention to. A few things that stood out: 💸 The end goal for advertising: any business comes with an objective and a budget — $META delivers the results. Zuck calls it “the ultimate business results machine.” 📈 Advertising has historically been ~1% of global GDP — but that includes enormous inefficiency. As it transforms into an AI-driven results machine, that share grows. 🤖 Every business will have an AI agent living in messaging platforms handling customer support and sales. Thailand and Vietnam are already the proof of concept — and they’re META’s 10th and 11th revenue countries despite ranking in the 30s by global GDP. 💬 WhatsApp, from a revenue perspective, is just getting started. ___ 🎙️ YouTube: Stripe | A conversation with Mark Zuckerberg (05/08/2025)

Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®

49,669 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Evan Spiegel talks Snap Spectales vs. Meta Raybans. Feels a vertically-integrated approach targeting higher end (eg. Tesla with Roadster, Apple with iPhone) is the move for smart glasses. Also, says brand association is risky for Luxxotica: “I think it’s much more harmful for Luxottica than it is for Meta. I think Meta needed to partner with Luxottica because the Meta brand…is not something that people want to put anywhere near their face. So, I think that Meta really needed [them]. I think what’s challenging for Luxottica is they took the most iconic, crazy high-margin product and they destroyed the margin and then they associated it with Meta. So I think we’ll see if that pans out over a longer period of time, if that was the right brand choice for them. But I can definitely see why Meta needed to camouflage their brand, which I think a lot of people don’t resonate with and don’t like, with the Ray-Ban brand. But I think people are misreading the dynamic of what’s happening when you have Meta Ray-Bans on the shelf next to a regular pair of Ray-Bans and they’re both about the same price.” *** Full interview with David Senra here:
2:54

Evan Spiegel talks Snap Spectales vs. Meta Raybans. Feels a vertically-integrated approach targeting higher end (eg. Tesla with Roadster, Apple with iPhone) is the move for smart glasses. Also, says brand association is risky for Luxxotica: “I think it’s much more harmful for Luxottica than it is for Meta. I think Meta needed to partner with Luxottica because the Meta brand…is not something that people want to put anywhere near their face. So, I think that Meta really needed [them]. I think what’s challenging for Luxottica is they took the most iconic, crazy high-margin product and they destroyed the margin and then they associated it with Meta. So I think we’ll see if that pans out over a longer period of time, if that was the right brand choice for them. But I can definitely see why Meta needed to camouflage their brand, which I think a lot of people don’t resonate with and don’t like, with the Ray-Ban brand. But I think people are misreading the dynamic of what’s happening when you have Meta Ray-Bans on the shelf next to a regular pair of Ray-Bans and they’re both about the same price.” *** Full interview with David Senra here:

Bearly AI

320,493 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

emily chang: if you could choose one thing for people to know the truth about you, what would that one thing be? meghan: no one's even asked me that. what a great question. i just want people to know that i'm a real person. and i think a lot of that gets lost in what can be super dehumanizing when you look at the clickbait culture and how much is written about someone... my kids will see those magazines, and we all know mom's gossip. and so, i have to make a choice to move through the world as myself in spite of all the noise that's created. but maybe there would be less noise if people remembered that 'im a real person. #TheCircuit
1:40

emily chang: if you could choose one thing for people to know the truth about you, what would that one thing be? meghan: no one's even asked me that. what a great question. i just want people to know that i'm a real person. and i think a lot of that gets lost in what can be super dehumanizing when you look at the clickbait culture and how much is written about someone... my kids will see those magazines, and we all know mom's gossip. and so, i have to make a choice to move through the world as myself in spite of all the noise that's created. but maybe there would be less noise if people remembered that 'im a real person. #TheCircuit

magali 🐼

56,822 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

NEW: Trump is asked to say three good qualities about Kamala Harris at the Univision town hall. Question: What are the three virtues that you see in Vice President Kamala Harris? Here is what he said: 1. "She seems to have an ability to survive. She was out of the race and all of a sudden she's running for president. That's a great ability." 2. "She seems to have some pretty long-time friendships... I call that a good thing." 3. "She seems to have a nice way about her." "She does seem to be a survivor because remember, she was the first one out and all of a sudden she's running for president and the other 21 people that were running, they're sitting home watching her on television." "So that's by far the toughest question I've had today."
1:44

NEW: Trump is asked to say three good qualities about Kamala Harris at the Univision town hall. Question: What are the three virtues that you see in Vice President Kamala Harris? Here is what he said: 1. "She seems to have an ability to survive. She was out of the race and all of a sudden she's running for president. That's a great ability." 2. "She seems to have some pretty long-time friendships... I call that a good thing." 3. "She seems to have a nice way about her." "She does seem to be a survivor because remember, she was the first one out and all of a sudden she's running for president and the other 21 people that were running, they're sitting home watching her on television." "So that's by far the toughest question I've had today."

Collin Rugg

2,175,177 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

ELON: LEGACY MEDIA IS DRIVER OF MISINFORMATION... AVERAGE CITIZEN OFTEN KNOWS MORE THAN JOURNALISTS "I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often when I see an article about something I know a lot about, they get a lot wrong. The best interpretation is someone who doesn't really understand what's going on, has only a few facts, has to come up with an article. If you read an article about something you know about, how accurate is that article? Now imagine that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation, but not an exact situation. If somebody is an expert in the field and was actually there and writes about their experience, that's in a lot of cases going to be better than a journalist because the journalist wasn't there." Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023
1:09

ELON: LEGACY MEDIA IS DRIVER OF MISINFORMATION... AVERAGE CITIZEN OFTEN KNOWS MORE THAN JOURNALISTS "I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often when I see an article about something I know a lot about, they get a lot wrong. The best interpretation is someone who doesn't really understand what's going on, has only a few facts, has to come up with an article. If you read an article about something you know about, how accurate is that article? Now imagine that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation, but not an exact situation. If somebody is an expert in the field and was actually there and writes about their experience, that's in a lot of cases going to be better than a journalist because the journalist wasn't there." Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023

Mario Nawfal

39,061 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's apology over the temporary removal of PM Modi's video, Cyber Expert Prashant Mali says, "If a social media platform has removed the Prime Minister of India's official video without valid justification, then this is not merely about one individual. It raises serious questions about accountability towards India's democratic institutions. However, I feel the government should deal with this issue strictly within the framework of law and not emotion. If Meta has violated Indian laws, the IT Act, the Intermediary Rules, or any other applicable legal provisions, the government is well within its rights to seek an explanation and initiate legal proceedings if warranted, because that is required. At the same time, Meta also must demonstrate transparency by publicly explaining why the video was taken down and whether this was the result of a human or technical error. An apology and a clear commitment to prevent such incidents in the future would be the responsible course of action. I feel India is one of Meta's largest markets, and every global platform, be it a technology platform or a social media platform, must respect India's laws, democratic institutions, and digital sovereignty. That's very important. Being a sovereign country and respecting digital sovereignty have become two things that Meta is clearly seen not doing here. And I think, henceforth, Meta will respect India's digital sovereignty." (Source: Self-Made)
3:26

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's apology over the temporary removal of PM Modi's video, Cyber Expert Prashant Mali says, "If a social media platform has removed the Prime Minister of India's official video without valid justification, then this is not merely about one individual. It raises serious questions about accountability towards India's democratic institutions. However, I feel the government should deal with this issue strictly within the framework of law and not emotion. If Meta has violated Indian laws, the IT Act, the Intermediary Rules, or any other applicable legal provisions, the government is well within its rights to seek an explanation and initiate legal proceedings if warranted, because that is required. At the same time, Meta also must demonstrate transparency by publicly explaining why the video was taken down and whether this was the result of a human or technical error. An apology and a clear commitment to prevent such incidents in the future would be the responsible course of action. I feel India is one of Meta's largest markets, and every global platform, be it a technology platform or a social media platform, must respect India's laws, democratic institutions, and digital sovereignty. That's very important. Being a sovereign country and respecting digital sovereignty have become two things that Meta is clearly seen not doing here. And I think, henceforth, Meta will respect India's digital sovereignty." (Source: Self-Made)

ANI

113,802 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Meta’s Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang just put a five-year countdown on the most consequential race in human history. Wang: “Mark and myself, we very strongly believe that this is a very special time in human history.” Not a decade. Not a generation. Five years. Wang: “The discoveries made over the next half-decade are going to be some of the most monumental discoveries that human civilization has ever made.” To run that race, Meta didn’t just build a new model. They built an entirely new division from scratch. Meta Superintelligence Labs. Designed from a blank slate. Singular focus. Wang: “What does the optimal team look like for the future of superintelligence?” The bottleneck to superintelligence isn’t compute anymore. It isn’t data. It’s the density of human genius in a single room. Wang: “Highest talent density. Bring the very best people together and build the best possible environment for them.” The AI arms race has shifted from hoarding GPUs to hoarding the smartest minds on earth. The first company to perfect that organizational structure will be the first company to reach superintelligence. But reaching it is only half the battle. Deploying what you built to the world is the other half. And here is where Meta’s advantage becomes almost unfair. Wang: “Three and a half billion people utilize our platforms every single day.” While every other AI lab is still trying to figure out how to get users to adopt their technology, Meta already has nearly half the planet locked into their ecosystem. MSL wasn’t built just to achieve scientific breakthroughs. Wang: “Build the products that will enable this technology to be deployed to billions and billions of people worldwide.” Whoever builds superintelligence first wins the race. Whoever distributes it to 3.5 billion people controls what comes after. Meta is positioning to do both.
1:31

Meta’s Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang just put a five-year countdown on the most consequential race in human history. Wang: “Mark and myself, we very strongly believe that this is a very special time in human history.” Not a decade. Not a generation. Five years. Wang: “The discoveries made over the next half-decade are going to be some of the most monumental discoveries that human civilization has ever made.” To run that race, Meta didn’t just build a new model. They built an entirely new division from scratch. Meta Superintelligence Labs. Designed from a blank slate. Singular focus. Wang: “What does the optimal team look like for the future of superintelligence?” The bottleneck to superintelligence isn’t compute anymore. It isn’t data. It’s the density of human genius in a single room. Wang: “Highest talent density. Bring the very best people together and build the best possible environment for them.” The AI arms race has shifted from hoarding GPUs to hoarding the smartest minds on earth. The first company to perfect that organizational structure will be the first company to reach superintelligence. But reaching it is only half the battle. Deploying what you built to the world is the other half. And here is where Meta’s advantage becomes almost unfair. Wang: “Three and a half billion people utilize our platforms every single day.” While every other AI lab is still trying to figure out how to get users to adopt their technology, Meta already has nearly half the planet locked into their ecosystem. MSL wasn’t built just to achieve scientific breakthroughs. Wang: “Build the products that will enable this technology to be deployed to billions and billions of people worldwide.” Whoever builds superintelligence first wins the race. Whoever distributes it to 3.5 billion people controls what comes after. Meta is positioning to do both.

Dustin

32,982 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce