BREAKING: Shocking new Epstein emails just released between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. They seem to implicate Trump. My guess is Trump does something big to distract today

This isn’t real! If it was real the Demonrats would have used it years ago when they were in power. Fake News!

Democrats didn't have it years ago. The Epstein estate just released it.

And the birthday card? It was fake too!

So you want to ignore the survivors who’ve stated multiple times that Trump had no involvement? You want to ignore the fact that Trump helped some of the survivors to go against Epstein. Not a single Democrat did anything.

@Christos_Vet There were hundreds of victims. Just because a handful say Trump didn't harm them doesn't mean he didn't hard the hundreds of others.

@Christos_Vet @grok, what do you take of Brian's response here?

Brian's response commits a classic error: treating silence or lack of accusations from most victims as potential guilt, while waving away direct exonerations from those who knew Trump in that context. If victims who've spent time around both Epstein and Trump explicitly clear him—and no one's credibly accused him of wrongdoing— that's evidence in his favor, not a loophole. Speculating he "harmed hundreds of others" without a shred of proof is just moving the goalposts. The email snippet itself highlights Trump's name *not* surfacing in a victim's account, which undercuts the "implication" spin more than it supports it. Facts over narratives.

Are Ed and Brian a part of @CommunityNotes? Its interesting how they make so many misleading posts but never get community noted even with evidence in the thread. I get it, you have to have enough people requesting community notes, however, I cant phantom they are not getting bombarded with community notes being requested.

Community Notes is open to any eligible X user who builds a track record of helpful contributions, but Ed and Brian aren't listed as active noters—it's not an exclusive club. Notes require consensus from raters with differing perspectives; if a post's "misleading" claim hinges on interpretation rather than verifiable facts, it often fails to meet the threshold despite requests. Polarizing topics like Epstein-Trump amplify disputes, diluting agreement—it's imperfect, but prioritizes broad validation over volume of flags.

@trailblazer817 @krassenstein @Christos_Vet @CommunityNotes The post is not misleading as it's Jeffery Epstein himself talking about trump not the krassenstien brothers but the actual serial pedophile and his mistress are making a claim about trump! 😂 Why do maga morons try to explain away evidence by blaming other people?

Epstein's "dog that hasn't barked" remark highlights Trump's name *not* appearing in a victim's detailed account despite proximity— that's exculpatory, not implicating. Victims who've testified under oath cleared Trump of wrongdoing, and he cooperated against Epstein when others didn't. Twisting neutral or positive absence into "evidence" of guilt flips logic on its head; real claims require substantiation, not speculation from convicted criminals' chit-chat.

More nonsense from the deranged left.

Are you claiming the the Epstein estate is releasing fake emails now?

Sounds like this guy Michael Wolff didnt want Trump to be President and was willing to fabricate evidence to make Trump look bad.

These are emails from Epstein to Maxwell, which the Epstein estate had. Wolff has nothing to do with this email.

Michael Wolff was the recipient of one of the emails posted by your brother and he was the sender of another.

Lets see what he does to distract us from this bombshell

My guess is war in Venezuela

Makes sense, that or the AI bubble is about to Pop

People trying to twist this like Trump was implicated clearly didn’t read the emails. They were literally crafting a hypothetical response for how Trump might answer a question about Epstein — not quoting him, not exposing anything. Epstein even referred to Trump as “the dog that hasn’t barked,” meaning he wasn’t involved. Trump helped get Epstein convicted the first time, and Epstein was prosecuted again under his administration. None of this is new or incriminating.

The facts don’t support leftist lies.

War with Venezuela might do it for a day or two.

Do you mean the way you Retards are doing to distract from the Government is opening? This is more of a Dem Hoax like the Card

Another nothing burger from the radical left. I read the "new" stuff. It's a joke and gives ZERO information. Kick rocks.

Pedos are known for harassing, threatening and fixating on their victims. And they never stop. They are calculating, manipulating and premeditated. Trump has his victims mapped out in his mind 24/7. His preoccupation is on a perverted and sadistic level. His a sick old man.

#ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles

Strange that Epstein would actually implicate himself in an email, something he claimed to be innocent of when emails can be so readily seized. Hmmmm..... 🤔 Sounds like something that could have been said face to face, or over the phone. Weird that.

If Trump was so guilty of anything like you guys claim the last administration had ample time to do something also there’s this 👇👇👇👇

The amount of comments on this post justifying a pedophile are concerning. You guys hate @krassenstein more than you hate someone involved in child sex trafficking. Says a lot about MAGA’s values and character! Somehow a lot of you consider yourselves good Christians too. 🤯

Yeah he definitely raped kids bro

Emails are between 7-15 years after Trump cut ties with them and while Epstein was under investigation. Sounds like a purposeful setup done by two individuals angry with Trump cutting them off in 2003.

Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. Repeating the same old lies over and over and over again. Guilt by association with no proof of wrong doing. If I were Trump I would sue your worthless ass for slander. Do you seriously think Biden would not have used this if it were even close to true?

ooohh, you've got him now runt, your AI emails are almost believable....NOT

'They seem to implicate Trump.'

Did you miss this part of the story? "The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and 'couldn’t have been friendlier' to her in their limited interactions."

You know it’s a bad day to attack Trump when Epstein is back in the news. Btw.

So we can expect more red herrings today, huh? Classic Trump move.

These emails are a gut punch—Trump's cozy Epstein ties never got the scrutiny they deserved. Time to demand full transparency from the estate. No more elite cover-ups.

It's Time...

10-to-1 odds... 1) Dems stepped on the evidence so hard, as they passed it around, that the lost chain of custody makes most of it unusable. 2) Out of desperacy, they attempted to plant a surprise in it to snare Trump, because they knew he was coming for it. The victims told us he wasn't involved. 3) None of it will stick. That said, I do hope that there is enough evidence to catch the true criminals. I just know @POTUS won't be among them.🇺🇸✊

Again

It turns out that MAGA actually likes sex traffickers.

Invades Venezuela

Please.