Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 BREAKING: SNP insiders drop bombshell Two former finance officials have come forward saying Nicola Sturgeon and the top brass bullied them for raising serious questions about the party books back in 2021. They flagged almost 400 grand in dodgy payments and over one and a half million unaccounted...

MrsBr0wn_82's profile picture

Cat Brown 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🚜🇬🇧🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

11,131 subscribers

365,326 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Towards the end of this interview Laura Kuenssberg asks Nicola Sturgeon if she'll pay out of her own pocket to recover the funds embezzled by her ex-husband 🤷‍♂️ Sturgeon was arrested, investigated, and released without charge Peter Murrell pleaded guilty to the embezzlement, so he bears criminal responsibility Spouses are not automatically liable for each other's crimes under UK law unless there's evidence of joint enterprise or prior knowledge Laura Kuenssberg knows this but she said it anyway One of the most powerful women in British politics brought down not because of what she did or didn't do, but because of what her ex-husband did And one of the most influential high profile journalists covering British politics, not showing support to her, but exploiting the fact that she was a victim, to bring her down even further
23:23

Towards the end of this interview Laura Kuenssberg asks Nicola Sturgeon if she'll pay out of her own pocket to recover the funds embezzled by her ex-husband 🤷‍♂️ Sturgeon was arrested, investigated, and released without charge Peter Murrell pleaded guilty to the embezzlement, so he bears criminal responsibility Spouses are not automatically liable for each other's crimes under UK law unless there's evidence of joint enterprise or prior knowledge Laura Kuenssberg knows this but she said it anyway One of the most powerful women in British politics brought down not because of what she did or didn't do, but because of what her ex-husband did And one of the most influential high profile journalists covering British politics, not showing support to her, but exploiting the fact that she was a victim, to bring her down even further

Farrukh

274,864 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨This Karen didn’t do nuffin! But hotel staff and police said she had to leave. —First she makes a scene and comes at a hotel staffer screaming about towels. —When police show up to escort her out of the building, she screams at them saying she knows her rights and they need to do a full investigation. She asks them to view the cameras and listen to her side of the story because she has a RIGHT to stay there. Is this a case of racism or can any business refuse service? They asked for body-cams… They got body-cams.
1:35

🚨This Karen didn’t do nuffin! But hotel staff and police said she had to leave. —First she makes a scene and comes at a hotel staffer screaming about towels. —When police show up to escort her out of the building, she screams at them saying she knows her rights and they need to do a full investigation. She asks them to view the cameras and listen to her side of the story because she has a RIGHT to stay there. Is this a case of racism or can any business refuse service? They asked for body-cams… They got body-cams.

AmyLouWho

74,720 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Retired Ottawa Police officer Rob Stocki explains the complicated background of Helen Grus' case: She was prevented from presenting evidence, the hearing officer worked against her, she was told not to present evidence by a superior, her union refused to pay for her defence, and someone LEAKED confidential police information to the media to create a PR case against her. What started it all? She literally did her job. She is what is known in the police community as a "digger." It's a compliment. She doesn't wait around, she gets to work. She finds the answers. She takes initiative. It's why she's had such a remarkable policing career and she was on her way to sergeant before this political prosecution. When she noticed an alarming uptick in infant mortality a few years ago, she investigated. Her former unit is mandated to investigate these tragic occurrences. She looked at all possible links, including vaccines, and that upset powerful people. The idea that police need permission to investigate any possible crime is contrary to the principles of policing. She did her job. She upheld her Christian beliefs and her oath. She refused to be intimidated. She stood up for the voiceless and the vulnerable. She is the very best of policing and society. She is a hero. And she is not alone.
15:59

Retired Ottawa Police officer Rob Stocki explains the complicated background of Helen Grus' case: She was prevented from presenting evidence, the hearing officer worked against her, she was told not to present evidence by a superior, her union refused to pay for her defence, and someone LEAKED confidential police information to the media to create a PR case against her. What started it all? She literally did her job. She is what is known in the police community as a "digger." It's a compliment. She doesn't wait around, she gets to work. She finds the answers. She takes initiative. It's why she's had such a remarkable policing career and she was on her way to sergeant before this political prosecution. When she noticed an alarming uptick in infant mortality a few years ago, she investigated. Her former unit is mandated to investigate these tragic occurrences. She looked at all possible links, including vaccines, and that upset powerful people. The idea that police need permission to investigate any possible crime is contrary to the principles of policing. She did her job. She upheld her Christian beliefs and her oath. She refused to be intimidated. She stood up for the voiceless and the vulnerable. She is the very best of policing and society. She is a hero. And she is not alone.

Right Blend

29,338 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell were the husband and wife team at the top of the Scottish Nationalist Party. Like all socialist parties, it redistributed wealth - to itself. Peter Murrell has just admitted embezzling over £400,000 from SNP donors, and it looks like there could be further revelations to come. It's so funny because all these donations are from grim little Scottish nationalists who scraped together their money and gave it to the SNP to push for independence, and then the top guy in the SNP just used it to buy luxury toilet seats, sports cars and £2,600 pepper pots. But how much did Sturgeon know? She's been photographed standing next to or wearing some of the luxury items bought with these embezzled funds. Does it prove the rumours that her marriage was a sham and she was living elsewhere with a lesbian? Or had she succumbed to the same self-serving logic as fellow socialist Ceausescu and started to believe that THEIR stealing is ethical? The publisher of Nicola Sturgeon’s book received £700,000 in government funding. I wonder how much her advance was?
13:42

Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell were the husband and wife team at the top of the Scottish Nationalist Party. Like all socialist parties, it redistributed wealth - to itself. Peter Murrell has just admitted embezzling over £400,000 from SNP donors, and it looks like there could be further revelations to come. It's so funny because all these donations are from grim little Scottish nationalists who scraped together their money and gave it to the SNP to push for independence, and then the top guy in the SNP just used it to buy luxury toilet seats, sports cars and £2,600 pepper pots. But how much did Sturgeon know? She's been photographed standing next to or wearing some of the luxury items bought with these embezzled funds. Does it prove the rumours that her marriage was a sham and she was living elsewhere with a lesbian? Or had she succumbed to the same self-serving logic as fellow socialist Ceausescu and started to believe that THEIR stealing is ethical? The publisher of Nicola Sturgeon’s book received £700,000 in government funding. I wonder how much her advance was?

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

27,486 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Sturgeon Files🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⚡️: "All of the missing donations have gone towards Scottish Independence, I guarantee it" - Lying toad Ian Blackford from within the House Of Commons in 2022. Watch as former SNP Parliamentary Leader Ian Blackford LIES to the entire country, giving a guarantee that ALL of the missing SNP members funds has not been stolen and will go to an 'Independence' vote. Surely this must carry some legal ramifications for the bloated Ian Blackford? He made these false statements during the police investigation which deceived SNP supporters to the veracity of Sturgeon, Murrell and the party's credibility which now lies in ruins.
1:35

The Sturgeon Files🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⚡️: "All of the missing donations have gone towards Scottish Independence, I guarantee it" - Lying toad Ian Blackford from within the House Of Commons in 2022. Watch as former SNP Parliamentary Leader Ian Blackford LIES to the entire country, giving a guarantee that ALL of the missing SNP members funds has not been stolen and will go to an 'Independence' vote. Surely this must carry some legal ramifications for the bloated Ian Blackford? He made these false statements during the police investigation which deceived SNP supporters to the veracity of Sturgeon, Murrell and the party's credibility which now lies in ruins.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

85,337 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Lady publicly cries out for help over her brother who has been missing for the past three weeks in Enugu, alleging that despite reaching out to the company he worked for, she has received no tangible feedback. According to her, her brother worked as a security guard with St. Christopher Security Agency in Enugu and had been missing since the 7th of this month. She said she traveled from Abuja to Enugu to meet the company, where she was told that they had reported the case to the police two days after he went missing, on the 9th. She explained that the police requested his photograph, which she immediately sent to the company. However, when she personally visited the police station to make a report, officers allegedly told her that the company never returned with the picture they requested and had not been actively following up on the case. She also claimed that after the police made an arrest, the statement from the person arrested was completely different from the information she was initially given.
2:24

Lady publicly cries out for help over her brother who has been missing for the past three weeks in Enugu, alleging that despite reaching out to the company he worked for, she has received no tangible feedback. According to her, her brother worked as a security guard with St. Christopher Security Agency in Enugu and had been missing since the 7th of this month. She said she traveled from Abuja to Enugu to meet the company, where she was told that they had reported the case to the police two days after he went missing, on the 9th. She explained that the police requested his photograph, which she immediately sent to the company. However, when she personally visited the police station to make a report, officers allegedly told her that the company never returned with the picture they requested and had not been actively following up on the case. She also claimed that after the police made an arrest, the statement from the person arrested was completely different from the information she was initially given.

CHUKS 🍥

71,220 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Vrinda Advitiya is very upset and crying because she has been standing at the police station since morning, but no one is listening to her. She says the officers are shouting at her and even threatened to file a case against her when she tried to talk. She mentions that a "Baba" is in jail and she has live video proof of some unfair behavior by Nagar Nigam officials. After making her wait all day, the police are now telling her to come back tomorrow or the day after. She is recording this video to show everyone what is happening and says if anything happens to her, these people will be responsible.
0:48

Vrinda Advitiya is very upset and crying because she has been standing at the police station since morning, but no one is listening to her. She says the officers are shouting at her and even threatened to file a case against her when she tried to talk. She mentions that a "Baba" is in jail and she has live video proof of some unfair behavior by Nagar Nigam officials. After making her wait all day, the police are now telling her to come back tomorrow or the day after. She is recording this video to show everyone what is happening and says if anything happens to her, these people will be responsible.

Arpit

103,904 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Candace Owens claims she never gives anyone limits when they interview her. I guess she thought we forgot when she got cooked 🔥 by CNN of all places. After Candace was exposed for not knowing 💩 she tried to use the excuse that she LIMITED them to not asking questions about her fake Charlie Kirk investigation before the interview. Go ahead and add this to her list of lies.
1:54

Candace Owens claims she never gives anyone limits when they interview her. I guess she thought we forgot when she got cooked 🔥 by CNN of all places. After Candace was exposed for not knowing 💩 she tried to use the excuse that she LIMITED them to not asking questions about her fake Charlie Kirk investigation before the interview. Go ahead and add this to her list of lies.

Cinema Shogun

35,407 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"This country is being held to ransom by the likes of Patrick Harvie and Maggie Chapman and John Swinney's intransigence, because John Swinney will not admit that Nicola Sturgeon got it wrong. The whole of the Scottish National Party group in the Parliament that voted for the gender recognition reform bill, did it to prove their loyalty to the former First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon. Because to advance your career in the Scottish National Party for the past 10 years, you had to have blind loyalty, which meant effectively saying, that black was white and white was black." Lloyd Quinan with Barrhead Boy (Through A Scottish Prism) and eva comrie Fife_For_Life Phil Boswell Alliance To Liberate Scotland ISP - Independence for Scotland Party Sovereignty For Women Scotland 🎥 Watch Again
2:50

"This country is being held to ransom by the likes of Patrick Harvie and Maggie Chapman and John Swinney's intransigence, because John Swinney will not admit that Nicola Sturgeon got it wrong. The whole of the Scottish National Party group in the Parliament that voted for the gender recognition reform bill, did it to prove their loyalty to the former First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon. Because to advance your career in the Scottish National Party for the past 10 years, you had to have blind loyalty, which meant effectively saying, that black was white and white was black." Lloyd Quinan with Barrhead Boy (Through A Scottish Prism) and eva comrie Fife_For_Life Phil Boswell Alliance To Liberate Scotland ISP - Independence for Scotland Party Sovereignty For Women Scotland 🎥 Watch Again

ScotNews

23,389 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This is part of the story of our now deceased comrade, Marinos Alexandria, who died in the wee hours of this morning after a while of getting treatment for the torture ocassioned upon her. She was abducted and tortured by security operatives, the UPDF spokesperson confirmed they had detained her, but released her days later without charge. So why didn't they take her to police or court if she had committed a crime? Why did they release her with torture marks and signs of abuse after holding her in incommunicado detention? Why did police where she went afterwards to report send her away without filing her complaint against the abduction and torture? Why did the Uganda Human Rights Commission pay a deaf ear to the complaint she raised with them? Many questions, few answers!
3:13

This is part of the story of our now deceased comrade, Marinos Alexandria, who died in the wee hours of this morning after a while of getting treatment for the torture ocassioned upon her. She was abducted and tortured by security operatives, the UPDF spokesperson confirmed they had detained her, but released her days later without charge. So why didn't they take her to police or court if she had committed a crime? Why did they release her with torture marks and signs of abuse after holding her in incommunicado detention? Why did police where she went afterwards to report send her away without filing her complaint against the abduction and torture? Why did the Uganda Human Rights Commission pay a deaf ear to the complaint she raised with them? Many questions, few answers!

Joel Ssenyonyi

32,443 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Nicola Sturgeon’s crooked estranged husband spent part of your hard earned taxpayer money on luxury gifts and vacations. For that reason he has been given a 5 year prison sentence, which will most likely be cut in half thanks to the SNP’s soft touch approach to justice. And of course the SNP refuse to have a public inquiry on this matter. Nicola Sturgeon is not an innocent victim here: she was the leader of the SNP at the time and shot down anyone who raised questions. Now it is her turn to answer some very important questions.
2:15

Nicola Sturgeon’s crooked estranged husband spent part of your hard earned taxpayer money on luxury gifts and vacations. For that reason he has been given a 5 year prison sentence, which will most likely be cut in half thanks to the SNP’s soft touch approach to justice. And of course the SNP refuse to have a public inquiry on this matter. Nicola Sturgeon is not an innocent victim here: she was the leader of the SNP at the time and shot down anyone who raised questions. Now it is her turn to answer some very important questions.

Dr Pam Gosal MBE

39,975 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A Muslim woman who was fasting was brutally tied up and beaten. When she asked for water, instead of giving her water, she was forced to drink a mixture of alcohol and urine. On February 25, 2026, during the month of Ramadan, Roshan Khatoon, a resident of Madhubani district in Bihar, was brutally beaten while she was fasting. She later died on March 1. According to the family, Roshan Khatoon had gone to the village head’s house to resolve a dispute, where she was tied to a pole and beaten with sticks. The family claims that when she asked for water while fasting, instead of giving her water, she was forced to drink a mixture of alcohol and urine. The family alleges that she was targeted because she was a Muslim and that this was done deliberately to humiliate her. Serious questions have also been raised about the role of the police after the incident. The family alleges that instead of taking her to the hospital in an injured condition, she was taken to the police station and a demand of ₹50,000 was made. In the case, 19 accused have been named, but so far only one arrest has been made. The family has accused the Bihar police of not taking the matter seriously and supporting the accused. It has also been stated that the accused have the backing of BJP and JDU. Even after one month of the incident, the postmortem report has not been released. Reporting: Meer Faisal Vc:Observer Post Hindi Full report on YouTube 👇
8:16

A Muslim woman who was fasting was brutally tied up and beaten. When she asked for water, instead of giving her water, she was forced to drink a mixture of alcohol and urine. On February 25, 2026, during the month of Ramadan, Roshan Khatoon, a resident of Madhubani district in Bihar, was brutally beaten while she was fasting. She later died on March 1. According to the family, Roshan Khatoon had gone to the village head’s house to resolve a dispute, where she was tied to a pole and beaten with sticks. The family claims that when she asked for water while fasting, instead of giving her water, she was forced to drink a mixture of alcohol and urine. The family alleges that she was targeted because she was a Muslim and that this was done deliberately to humiliate her. Serious questions have also been raised about the role of the police after the incident. The family alleges that instead of taking her to the hospital in an injured condition, she was taken to the police station and a demand of ₹50,000 was made. In the case, 19 accused have been named, but so far only one arrest has been made. The family has accused the Bihar police of not taking the matter seriously and supporting the accused. It has also been stated that the accused have the backing of BJP and JDU. Even after one month of the incident, the postmortem report has not been released. Reporting: Meer Faisal Vc:Observer Post Hindi Full report on YouTube 👇

The Muslim Matter India

11,486 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Today Show interview got better for Karen Read as it went on, and she responded to the comment about how John was being lost in all of this perfectly: "He's not lost, he's the reason we're doing this." This needs to be emphasized more because it's the most common criticism of her detractors. Karen is John's voice. There would be no justice for John O'Keefe if she was convicted. She and her team have done more to shed light on what really happened to him than anyone who claims to be fighting for him while trying to put her in prison. She really humanized him with this answer, telling the public who John really was, and what a tremendous loss this was for everyone. We rarely heard this from her during the trial and it was powerful. The antis have tried to take ownership of John's legacy and she took it back with this answer. I know Karen cared for John because she sent me pictures of him that showed what a good father he was, and pictures of her with the kids that showed how much they liked her. She asked me not to share them publicly because she didn't want to exploit them, but she wanted me to know what a tremendous loss it was for the kids.
1:40

The Today Show interview got better for Karen Read as it went on, and she responded to the comment about how John was being lost in all of this perfectly: "He's not lost, he's the reason we're doing this." This needs to be emphasized more because it's the most common criticism of her detractors. Karen is John's voice. There would be no justice for John O'Keefe if she was convicted. She and her team have done more to shed light on what really happened to him than anyone who claims to be fighting for him while trying to put her in prison. She really humanized him with this answer, telling the public who John really was, and what a tremendous loss this was for everyone. We rarely heard this from her during the trial and it was powerful. The antis have tried to take ownership of John's legacy and she took it back with this answer. I know Karen cared for John because she sent me pictures of him that showed what a good father he was, and pictures of her with the kids that showed how much they liked her. She asked me not to share them publicly because she didn't want to exploit them, but she wanted me to know what a tremendous loss it was for the kids.

Aidan Kearney

100,750 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)
9:52

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)

ANI

41,692 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨UPDATE: Trial hears two women who accused Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexually abusing them claim he subjected them to “difficult and traumatic incidents” when they were children 🎤Chief Reporter James from Newry Crown Court. The former DUP Leader is accused of rape and several counts of gross indecency and of indecent assault. He has pleaded not guilty to the 18 alleged offences. The charges span between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims. Mr Donaldson’s wife Lady Eleanor Donaldson, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending. She is facing a trial of the facts. Barrister Rosemary Walsh KC opened the prosecution case by summarising the evidence. She told the jury they would hear evidence from witnesses as well as police interviews carried out with the Donaldsons at the time of their arrest in 2024. Ms Walsh said two complainants had come forward to police more than two years ago and reported “difficult and traumatic incidents they say happened when they were children”. She said the evidence of the two complainants would in part be delivered during the trial by pre-recorded interviews. She said they would be cross-examined by barristers but would not come into the court. Ms Walsh said that in March 2024 Complainant B told police that she had been sexually abused when she was a child and that she remembered two incidents “vividly”. In the first alleged incident, she told the police that Jeffrey Donaldson had put his hands down her underwear, pulled her legs apart and then sexually assaulted her. In the second incident she told police that Donaldson had lifted her top and started to touch her breasts. Ms Walsh said Complainant B had said there were other incidents and that Donaldson had put his hands down her pants “a lot”. The barrister told the jury that Complainant B had later been at a meeting with Donaldson at a Christian centre and he had “apologised to her for what had happened in the past”. Ms Walsh then turned to the evidence that would be presented during the trial by Complainant A. Complainant A also made a statement to police in March 2024. She alleged that Donaldson touched her on a number of occasions under her top when she was a child. She told police that touching her had become something he had “done quite often”. She told police that Donaldson would make comments about her appearance, including the size of her breasts. She recalled one incident where she claimed that Donaldson had been “looking at her private parts”. The jury was told that the Donaldsons had been arrested on March 28 2024 and were subject to a number of police interviews. In Jeffrey Donaldson’s interview, when Complainant B’s account was put to him, he said it was “unbelievable” that he would have touched her in a sexual way. Regarding Complainant A, he denied that he ever rubbed her breast. Eleanor Donaldson is facing a trial of the facts, not a criminal trial, after Judge Paul Ramsey ruled her unfit to stand trial on mental health grounds. The trial of the facts will test the evidence in the case but cannot result in a criminal conviction. It is being heard by the same jury, with proceedings against both Donaldsons running simultaneously as part of one overall trial process presided over by Judge Ramsey. The trial continues.
1:15

🚨UPDATE: Trial hears two women who accused Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexually abusing them claim he subjected them to “difficult and traumatic incidents” when they were children 🎤Chief Reporter James from Newry Crown Court. The former DUP Leader is accused of rape and several counts of gross indecency and of indecent assault. He has pleaded not guilty to the 18 alleged offences. The charges span between 1985 and 2008 involving two alleged victims. Mr Donaldson’s wife Lady Eleanor Donaldson, denies several charges of aiding and abetting her husband’s alleged offending. She is facing a trial of the facts. Barrister Rosemary Walsh KC opened the prosecution case by summarising the evidence. She told the jury they would hear evidence from witnesses as well as police interviews carried out with the Donaldsons at the time of their arrest in 2024. Ms Walsh said two complainants had come forward to police more than two years ago and reported “difficult and traumatic incidents they say happened when they were children”. She said the evidence of the two complainants would in part be delivered during the trial by pre-recorded interviews. She said they would be cross-examined by barristers but would not come into the court. Ms Walsh said that in March 2024 Complainant B told police that she had been sexually abused when she was a child and that she remembered two incidents “vividly”. In the first alleged incident, she told the police that Jeffrey Donaldson had put his hands down her underwear, pulled her legs apart and then sexually assaulted her. In the second incident she told police that Donaldson had lifted her top and started to touch her breasts. Ms Walsh said Complainant B had said there were other incidents and that Donaldson had put his hands down her pants “a lot”. The barrister told the jury that Complainant B had later been at a meeting with Donaldson at a Christian centre and he had “apologised to her for what had happened in the past”. Ms Walsh then turned to the evidence that would be presented during the trial by Complainant A. Complainant A also made a statement to police in March 2024. She alleged that Donaldson touched her on a number of occasions under her top when she was a child. She told police that touching her had become something he had “done quite often”. She told police that Donaldson would make comments about her appearance, including the size of her breasts. She recalled one incident where she claimed that Donaldson had been “looking at her private parts”. The jury was told that the Donaldsons had been arrested on March 28 2024 and were subject to a number of police interviews. In Jeffrey Donaldson’s interview, when Complainant B’s account was put to him, he said it was “unbelievable” that he would have touched her in a sexual way. Regarding Complainant A, he denied that he ever rubbed her breast. Eleanor Donaldson is facing a trial of the facts, not a criminal trial, after Judge Paul Ramsey ruled her unfit to stand trial on mental health grounds. The trial of the facts will test the evidence in the case but cannot result in a criminal conviction. It is being heard by the same jury, with proceedings against both Donaldsons running simultaneously as part of one overall trial process presided over by Judge Ramsey. The trial continues.

Cool FM News

42,589 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 A single mum was terrorised in her home by immigrants living next door UK Police did nothing about the incidents, they threatened to arrest the mum for 'inciting racial hatred' if she went to the press She contacted me to shine a light on her case, I put a post out on X and they arrested me, confiscated my phone and put me on strict bail conditions for 3 months This is what you call two-tier policing in the UK
1:34

🚨 A single mum was terrorised in her home by immigrants living next door UK Police did nothing about the incidents, they threatened to arrest the mum for 'inciting racial hatred' if she went to the press She contacted me to shine a light on her case, I put a post out on X and they arrested me, confiscated my phone and put me on strict bail conditions for 3 months This is what you call two-tier policing in the UK

Active Patriot

1,515,625 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Trump: I watched AOC answering questions in Munich. This was not a good look for the United States. I watched Gavin Newscum answering questions in Munich and this was a bad look for our country. These two people are incompetent and at least Hillary's competent. She's just Trump deranged. She was so deranged. She is an angry woman. But I watched the other two speaking and answering basic questions. Look, Gavin has destroyed California and AOC — I never really got her to — I never heard her speak very much. And they started answering questions. She had no idea what was happening. She had no idea how to answer, you know, very important questions concerning the world.
0:54

Trump: I watched AOC answering questions in Munich. This was not a good look for the United States. I watched Gavin Newscum answering questions in Munich and this was a bad look for our country. These two people are incompetent and at least Hillary's competent. She's just Trump deranged. She was so deranged. She is an angry woman. But I watched the other two speaking and answering basic questions. Look, Gavin has destroyed California and AOC — I never really got her to — I never heard her speak very much. And they started answering questions. She had no idea what was happening. She had no idea how to answer, you know, very important questions concerning the world.

Clash Report

88,300 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege
36:28

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

Brian Harrison

26,944 просмотров • 1 год назад

I'm at a loss for words to describe this. Not once did Hasina mention the students who lost their lives during the recent protests during her latest presser with business leaders. The police killed at least 170 students (the actual number is likely higher), but she didn't express any condolences, nor did she address the police brutality. All she said was that the protest was orchestrated by 'Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami and Bangladesh Nationalist Party-BNP,' and she will go to any extent to arrest and punish the perpetrators. This is sickening. What a classic case of a dictator she is!
7:00

I'm at a loss for words to describe this. Not once did Hasina mention the students who lost their lives during the recent protests during her latest presser with business leaders. The police killed at least 170 students (the actual number is likely higher), but she didn't express any condolences, nor did she address the police brutality. All she said was that the protest was orchestrated by 'Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami and Bangladesh Nationalist Party-BNP,' and she will go to any extent to arrest and punish the perpetrators. This is sickening. What a classic case of a dictator she is!

Sami

481,895 просмотров • 2 лет назад