正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

#BREAKING: Steele: “…on Monday the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could UPEND the midterms. The case centers on whether states can accept mail-in ballots postmarked before election day, even if they arrive to election offices after election day…if the court rules against that grace period,... show more

Emoluments Clause

112,980 subscribers

49,308 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治 #BREAKING

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Supreme Court's conservative majority on Monday appeared sympathetic to arguments by the Republican National Committee seeking to limit the counting of mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, even if they were postmarked on or before.

The Supreme Court's conservative majority on Monday appeared sympathetic to arguments by the Republican National Committee seeking to limit the counting of mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, even if they were postmarked on or before.

ABC News

31,505 次观看 • 6 个月前

DEVELOPING: The U.S. Supreme Court appears likely to STRIKE down state laws that allow mail-in ballots to be COUNTED up to 5 days after Election Day. Shannon Bream: “This stems from a Mississippi law that says you can get ballots counted up to 5 business days after election day. If those ballots are postmarked by Election Day.” “The RNC is challenging this.” “29 states have some kind of grace period after Election Day. So the implications of this issue could be widespread heading into the midterms.”

DEVELOPING: The U.S. Supreme Court appears likely to STRIKE down state laws that allow mail-in ballots to be COUNTED up to 5 days after Election Day. Shannon Bream: “This stems from a Mississippi law that says you can get ballots counted up to 5 business days after election day. If those ballots are postmarked by Election Day.” “The RNC is challenging this.” “29 states have some kind of grace period after Election Day. So the implications of this issue could be widespread heading into the midterms.”

RedWave Press

17,480 次观看 • 6 个月前

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects a Republican-led challenge to counting some mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that states can continue counting ballots received after Election Day if state law allows it and the ballots meet requirements, including being postmarked on time. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and the Court's three liberal justices. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, calling the ruling inconsistent with federal election law and "two centuries of historical practice." | Shannon Bream America's Newsroom

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects a Republican-led challenge to counting some mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that states can continue counting ballots received after Election Day if state law allows it and the ballots meet requirements, including being postmarked on time. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and the Court's three liberal justices. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, calling the ruling inconsistent with federal election law and "two centuries of historical practice." | Shannon Bream America's Newsroom

Fox News

1,023,434 次观看 • 2 个月前

McCaughey: The supreme court will be deciding a case about mail in ballots and the preposterous notion that you can that you can count ballots that arrive after election day. Phillip: Which we do all the time for people who live overseas and the military

McCaughey: The supreme court will be deciding a case about mail in ballots and the preposterous notion that you can that you can count ballots that arrive after election day. Phillip: Which we do all the time for people who live overseas and the military

Acyn

192,190 次观看 • 8 个月前

President Trump on Monday called mail-in ballots "detrimental to honest elections" after the US Supreme Court ruled that federal law permits mail-in ballots to arrive after Election Day

President Trump on Monday called mail-in ballots "detrimental to honest elections" after the US Supreme Court ruled that federal law permits mail-in ballots to arrive after Election Day

Bloomberg

31,994 次观看 • 2 个月前

HISTORIC: The Supreme Court has taken up two of Judicial Watch’s election integrity cases! They raise two massive issues: whether candidates have standing to challenge unlawful election rules and whether states can count ballots that arrive days or weeks after Election Day. Tom Fitton

HISTORIC: The Supreme Court has taken up two of Judicial Watch’s election integrity cases! They raise two massive issues: whether candidates have standing to challenge unlawful election rules and whether states can count ballots that arrive days or weeks after Election Day. Tom Fitton

Judicial Watch ⚖️

47,097 次观看 • 10 个月前

Oh Shizzles… 👀 There’s Real Hope for California: SCOTUS could potentially END “Election Month” Once and For All! Right now, the U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to rule in a major case called Watson v. Republican National Committee. What the case is about: Federal law has long set a clear Election Day for president, Senate, and House races—the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. But some states, including Mississippi (and California), allow mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day to still be counted if they arrive several days later. Mississippi gives a five-business-day “grace period.” Challengers argue this violates federal law that says ballots must actually be received by Election Day. What it implies for California and the country: The Supreme Court heard arguments in March, and most justices appeared READY TO SIDE WITH THE CHALLENGERS. If they rule that way (expected this month), it would strike down those post-Election Day counting windows in roughly 15 states plus D.C.—including California’s rules—for all federal elections. That means no more “ballots keep trickling in” for days or weeks after polls close. How impactful could this be? Absolutely Huge. It means Faster, clearer results on Election Night instead of weeks later.

Oh Shizzles… 👀 There’s Real Hope for California: SCOTUS could potentially END “Election Month” Once and For All! Right now, the U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to rule in a major case called Watson v. Republican National Committee. What the case is about: Federal law has long set a clear Election Day for president, Senate, and House races—the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. But some states, including Mississippi (and California), allow mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day to still be counted if they arrive several days later. Mississippi gives a five-business-day “grace period.” Challengers argue this violates federal law that says ballots must actually be received by Election Day. What it implies for California and the country: The Supreme Court heard arguments in March, and most justices appeared READY TO SIDE WITH THE CHALLENGERS. If they rule that way (expected this month), it would strike down those post-Election Day counting windows in roughly 15 states plus D.C.—including California’s rules—for all federal elections. That means no more “ballots keep trickling in” for days or weeks after polls close. How impactful could this be? Absolutely Huge. It means Faster, clearer results on Election Night instead of weeks later.

Whiplash347

23,654 次观看 • 3 个月前

Oh Shizzles… 👀 🚨There’s Real Hope for California: SCOTUS could potentially END “Election Month” Once and For All! Right now, the U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to rule in a major case called Watson v. Republican National Committee. What the case is about: Federal law has long set a clear Election Day for president, Senate, and House races—the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. But some states, including Mississippi (and California), allow mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day to still be counted if they arrive several days later. Mississippi gives a five-business-day “grace period.” Challengers argue this violates federal law that says ballots must actually be received by Election Day. What it implies for California and the country: The Supreme Court heard arguments in March, and most justices appeared READY TO SIDE WITH THE CHALLENGERS. If they rule that way (expected this month), it would strike down those post-Election Day counting windows in roughly 15 states plus D.C.—including California’s rules—for all federal elections. That means no more “ballots keep trickling in” for days or weeks after polls close. How impactful could this be? Absolutely Huge. It means Faster, clearer results on Election Night instead of weeks later. This is checkmate

Oh Shizzles… 👀 🚨There’s Real Hope for California: SCOTUS could potentially END “Election Month” Once and For All! Right now, the U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to rule in a major case called Watson v. Republican National Committee. What the case is about: Federal law has long set a clear Election Day for president, Senate, and House races—the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. But some states, including Mississippi (and California), allow mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day to still be counted if they arrive several days later. Mississippi gives a five-business-day “grace period.” Challengers argue this violates federal law that says ballots must actually be received by Election Day. What it implies for California and the country: The Supreme Court heard arguments in March, and most justices appeared READY TO SIDE WITH THE CHALLENGERS. If they rule that way (expected this month), it would strike down those post-Election Day counting windows in roughly 15 states plus D.C.—including California’s rules—for all federal elections. That means no more “ballots keep trickling in” for days or weeks after polls close. How impactful could this be? Absolutely Huge. It means Faster, clearer results on Election Night instead of weeks later. This is checkmate

MJTruthUltra

254,616 次观看 • 3 个月前

BIG COURT WIN! The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that counting ballots that arrive after Election Day is unlawful!

BIG COURT WIN! The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that counting ballots that arrive after Election Day is unlawful!

Tom Fitton

265,333 次观看 • 1 年前

For five years, Judicial Watch has fought states that allow ballots to arrive days and weeks after Election Day. This banana republic practice creates post-election confusion. We head to the Supreme Court on March 23 to defend our Fifth Circuit victory: ballots received up to 5 days after Election Day are unlawful.

For five years, Judicial Watch has fought states that allow ballots to arrive days and weeks after Election Day. This banana republic practice creates post-election confusion. We head to the Supreme Court on March 23 to defend our Fifth Circuit victory: ballots received up to 5 days after Election Day are unlawful.

Judicial Watch ⚖️

43,291 次观看 • 7 个月前

BREAKING: 29 States could see their laws allowing mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day OVERTURNED by the Supreme Court. This would be a massive win for election integrity JUSTICE ALITO: "Independence Day, birthday, and Election Day. They are all particular DAYS. So if we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase 'Election Day,' I think this is the DAY in which everything is going to take place."

BREAKING: 29 States could see their laws allowing mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day OVERTURNED by the Supreme Court. This would be a massive win for election integrity JUSTICE ALITO: "Independence Day, birthday, and Election Day. They are all particular DAYS. So if we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase 'Election Day,' I think this is the DAY in which everything is going to take place."

Benny Johnson

464,026 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: The US Supreme Court ruled states CAN accept mail-in ballots AFTER Election Day, 5-4 Yet ANOTHER reason the SAVE America Act must be passed NOW! This means states like California can CONTINUE taking WEEKS to count ballots after Election Day BEYOND insane. Barrett and Roberts joined liberals Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson

🚨 BREAKING: The US Supreme Court ruled states CAN accept mail-in ballots AFTER Election Day, 5-4 Yet ANOTHER reason the SAVE America Act must be passed NOW! This means states like California can CONTINUE taking WEEKS to count ballots after Election Day BEYOND insane. Barrett and Roberts joined liberals Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson

Nick Sortor

1,520,261 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Supreme Court has just allowed states like Mississippi to count certain mail-in ballots if they arrive a few days AFTER Election Day. This is EXACTLY why the SAVE America Act isn't optional. It's absolutely mandatory if we want election integrity.

The Supreme Court has just allowed states like Mississippi to count certain mail-in ballots if they arrive a few days AFTER Election Day. This is EXACTLY why the SAVE America Act isn't optional. It's absolutely mandatory if we want election integrity.

Glenn Beck

290,879 次观看 • 2 个月前

BREAKING: The Supreme Court on Monday, in a 5-4 decision, upheld state laws that allow the counting of late-arriving mail-in ballots even if they were postmarked by Election Day. ABC News' Devin Dwyer has the latest.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court on Monday, in a 5-4 decision, upheld state laws that allow the counting of late-arriving mail-in ballots even if they were postmarked by Election Day. ABC News' Devin Dwyer has the latest.

ABC News

40,644 次观看 • 2 个月前

Why are some mail-in ballots received after Election Day despite being postmarked before Election Day? “Will it shock you to learn,” Marc Elias asks, “that the same postmaster general who wants to cooperate with Donald Trump … that under his tenure, election mail is moving slower and slower?”

Why are some mail-in ballots received after Election Day despite being postmarked before Election Day? “Will it shock you to learn,” Marc Elias asks, “that the same postmaster general who wants to cooperate with Donald Trump … that under his tenure, election mail is moving slower and slower?”

Democracy Docket

35,591 次观看 • 2 个月前

President Trump reacted to the Supreme Court’s ruling that states can count mail ballots that are cast by Election Day but arrive later: “I think it was very detrimental to honest elections.” The high court split 5 to 4 in finding that Mississippi's measure does not conflict with federal statutes that set Election Day as the Tuesday after the first Monday in November in certain years.

President Trump reacted to the Supreme Court’s ruling that states can count mail ballots that are cast by Election Day but arrive later: “I think it was very detrimental to honest elections.” The high court split 5 to 4 in finding that Mississippi's measure does not conflict with federal statutes that set Election Day as the Tuesday after the first Monday in November in certain years.

CBS News

48,540 次观看 • 2 个月前

BREAKING: Federal Court Speeds Appeal over Challenges to State’s Counting of Ballots that Arrive after Election Day

BREAKING: Federal Court Speeds Appeal over Challenges to State’s Counting of Ballots that Arrive after Election Day

Tom Fitton

199,064 次观看 • 2 年前

The law requires an "Election Day," not an "Election Week." or "Election Month" -- counting ballots that arrive days and weeks after Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud! Illinois counts ballots that arrive up to 14 DAYS after Election Day, even without a postmark. Heavy lifting Judicial Watch ⚖️ has an appellate argument this week our legal challenge to this law....

The law requires an "Election Day," not an "Election Week." or "Election Month" -- counting ballots that arrive days and weeks after Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud! Illinois counts ballots that arrive up to 14 DAYS after Election Day, even without a postmark. Heavy lifting Judicial Watch ⚖️ has an appellate argument this week our legal challenge to this law....

Tom Fitton

388,293 次观看 • 2 年前