正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨BREAKING: The leftists on MSNBC are now DOUBLING DOWN on demonizing ICE officials. This has to STOP! "Just yesterday, Homeland Security released a propaganda video on their social website stating or using the nintendo’s pokemon to catch them all and continuing to dehumanize non-citizens." "The way you fix this...

36,247 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

After REPEATED attacks from Senator Rand Paul, Senator Markwayne Mullin finally stopped him cold with a BRUTAL truth bomb: “Sir, I get it. It’s about character assassination for you. That’s the way this game is played.” PAUL: “Do you think fighting as a resolution for political difference is a good example for the men and women of ICE and Border Patrol?” MULLIN: “As you can notice over my shoulder, here is my good friend Sean O’Brien. Both of us have had conversations. Both of us have shaken hands, and both of us agreed we could have done things different.” “Sean is someone that has become a close friend. We talk all the time. I’ve been on his podcast. We’ve talked through this. That’s how you handle your differences. Not like this chairman.” PAUL: “I’m glad you guys are friends now and that you’ve reconciled. But really, it doesn’t get to the real point, whether or not you think violence is the way we settle things.” “In the days after the fight you said, and I quote, sometimes people just need to be punched in the face.” “Is that still your opinion that political disputes can sometimes and often only be resolved by violence?” MULLIN: “No, I don’t I don’t always agree with that. I don’t believe in political violence. I’ve made that very clear. But sometimes people do need…” PAUL: “Unless it’s perpetrated on me.” That’s when Mullin fired back. MULLIN: “Sir, I get it. It’s about character assassination for you.” “That’s the way this game is played. I understand it, and you are making this about you, which is fine, but that doesn’t keep me as Secretary of Homeland Security.”

Overton

484,729 次观看 • 3 个月前

Former Fox News host Geraldo Rivera: “By focusing on the censorship aspect and the First Amendment aspect, it’s losing sight of what should be the lead and that’s that Jimmy Kimmel owes the family of Charlie Kirk and his wife Erika, two small children, an apology. You know, you know, what’s he saying? That if you’re if you’re a member of MAGA and Charlie is a friend of MAG, of MAGA, then he had it coming. It’s just — it’s — it’s in some ways — it’s very — it’s — extremely — extremely insensitive. The country is in a country is in a very tough spot right now. Everyone is walking on eggshells. The First Amendment is not a license to incite hatred and, you know, I think that we can think that we can start the discussion once Jimmy Kimmel apologizes, then they can talk about the business aspects and whether or not he gets whether or not he gets back on the schedule and so forth, but there’s got to there’s got to be a recognition that a terrible thing has happened here, and that millions of Americans are grievously hurt by what happened. You know, there is a — Charlie Kirk was beloved by many. And to just trample over it. He’s not even buried yet for goodness sake. And to make fun of the flags at half staff and so forth. I just half staff and so forth. I just think that we’ve got to look at it with a — with a notion that the country has to be healed, that we have to work to bring people together, that we need to respect each other. You know, we don’t have to agree, but we have to respect. And I think that, you know, the audience has deserted him for a good reason.”

Curtis Houck

825,225 次观看 • 9 个月前

Alex Karp, Palantir: “At a certain level of accomplishment, you’re in an artistic space where it’s very hard to explain why you have your insights.” "There’s one country in the world where you get rewarded for that.. in America, if you deliver, you can be you.” “This is a maximal freedom culture… & that self-expression—because it’s not playbook—creates an environment that is exceedingly hard to compete with & will piss off all the right people.” . . . "I think in the end, to do something important—whether it’s me, or @elianoayounes, or look at all these people here—these are among the best and most talented people in the world. At a certain level of accomplishment, you’re in an artistic space where it’s very hard to explain why you have your insights, and it goes way beyond experiences that have of course also influenced them. But I just have artistic impulses, and they shape my life, and I’ve allowed myself—or I’ve been forced to allow myself—the freedom to live that way. And there’s one country in the world where you get rewarded for that, because in America, if you deliver, you can be you. You’re your own boss, right? You decide who you want to talk to, you decide who you don’t want to talk to. You have ideas of things you’d like to advance on. And I think one of the biggest variables in my life is simply that I live in a culture where if you deliver—in this case economically—and by the way, at 18, for most investors, we were failing for at least 15 years. Many would say 18 years. Honestly, some would say until two years ago. And still, this is a culture where the financials are going to show up. That’s only possible in this culture. I guess maybe because I lived abroad so long, it’s easier for me to accept and rely on that. I think sometimes people who’ve lived here their whole life don’t always exactly understand that this is a maximal freedom culture. It’s the only culture like this in the world, and it allows you to self-express. And if you self-express, that self-expression—because it’s not playbook—creates an environment that is exceedingly hard to compete with and will piss off all the right people."

Molly O’Shea

52,497 次观看 • 5 个月前

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: “You said that it’s up to Congress if the president’s face is on a $250 bill. But it is actually — The Washington Post that’s reporting two political appointees from the Treasury Department who have asked agencies to be ready to — to do that. Do you think politically, it’s a good idea to put his face on a $250 bill when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Treasury Secretary Bessent: “You know, I don’t really understand this Washington Post article that — who here’s from The Post? Yeah. Terribly written, terribly edited. Because basically what it says is that Treasury is following the law and that we created the bill and that it’s up to Congress, but that — we follow the bill and it’s up to — I didn’t really understand what the story was.” Bessent: “So — anyway —” Collins: “So, these two political appointees aren’t involved in that? Two of your political appointees?” Bessent: “Yeah, of course, but we — we prepare for everything. If it gets passed, just like we — we were ready six months in advance of the one big, beautiful bill for tax guidance that. So, we have to prepare in advance. You can’t draw something up the day before.” Collins: “But, politically, do you think it’s a good idea, though, when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Bessent: “Look, I think it has — I think that it’s bifurcated. That — do you think we should have a 250th anniversary — the celebration?” Collins: “Well, that’s happening anyway, but putting the President’s face on a $250 bill —” Bessent: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no.” Collins: “— is a choice.” Bessent: “But Kaitlin, it’s not happening anyway. It’s happening because it’s being funded by private citizens, by the federal government, by state governments, by municipal governments to celebrate our country, and I don’t think that there’s anything untoward about having the President of the United States — the person who was President of United States on the 250th anniversary bill.”

Curtis Houck

32,387 次观看 • 1 个月前

CNBC’s Joe Kernen put Nikki Haley on the spot after she accused the Trump administration of “caving” on Iran. Kernen repeatedly pressed her to explain what “finish the job” actually means...and whether she’s willing to support a longer military conflict to achieve it. KERNEN: “If you’re pessimistic about how much… concessions we can get in this MOU to actually sign on the dotted line, so that let’s say that doesn’t happen.” “How long and what are you proposing? What are you proposing and how long are you willing to do it?” “Would you go into another six months of, of really, you know, something like an Iraq situation, like a surge or something?” “I mean, are we talking boots on the ground?…” “Would you go in for another six months of protracted combat if you had to?” HALEY: “I don’t think it would take another six months.” “But the real question is, it’s not do we go back in, it’s do you leave Iran stronger than they were pre-war?” “Are we willing to allow that to happen? Are we willing to allow them to threaten all the ships that go through the Strait of Hormuz?” “Are we willing to allow them to continue to fund their terrorist proxies?” “Are we willing to have them go and continue their nuclear ambitions?” “The answer to all three of those is no, we don’t like those answers. But at the end of the day, if you started it, you have to finish it.” “And this is one where this is not the U.S. alone. We need to get our Gulf allies. We need to get the Europeans. We need to finish this.” “The Gulf allies do not want to be in this situation right now. They were encouraging President Trump to finish the deal. When he is pulled back, they’re not happy with that. Our European allies are not happy with where we are. We need to pull them all together and finish this.” “This is not going to take six months. This is going to take commitment to say, finish the job, bring Iran to their knees.” “Stop with the release of the frozen assets, stop with the sanction waivers and finish what you started. They were weak already. We had them at the weakest they had ever been. And then we caved.” “That can’t happen.”

Overton

32,199 次观看 • 3 天前