Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BREAKING: The new U.S.-Iran agreement reportedly does not include specific limits on uranium enrichment, centrifuges, or terrorism funding. Even some Republicans are blasting the deal, with Sen. Bill Cassidy calling it the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.

Brian Allen

302,146 subscribers

31,004 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I just interviewed Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) about President Trump’s Iran peace agreement. Cassidy delivered one of the sharpest critiques yet from within the president’s own party, calling the agreement a “tremendous foreign policy blunder.”

I just interviewed Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) about President Trump’s Iran peace agreement. Cassidy delivered one of the sharpest critiques yet from within the president’s own party, calling the agreement a “tremendous foreign policy blunder.”

Reshad Hudson

31,783 views • 2 months ago

Susan Collins on whether she agrees w Bill Cassidy that Iran was the “worst foreign policy blunder in decades.” “I have said from the beginning that I hoped the war would be brief and successful.” Reserves judgment on the MOU: “I have not reviewed the MOU yet.”

Susan Collins on whether she agrees w Bill Cassidy that Iran was the “worst foreign policy blunder in decades.” “I have said from the beginning that I hoped the war would be brief and successful.” Reserves judgment on the MOU: “I have not reviewed the MOU yet.”

Manu Raju

172,675 views • 2 months ago

President Trump’s red lines are the right ones: - Open the Strait of Hormuz. - Zero enrichment. - Turn over enriched uranium. - Stop funding terrorism. Iran does not need enrichment for civilian nuclear energy. It needs enrichment for one thing: building a nuclear weapon. Secretary Rubio and I discussed how to ensure Iran understands it can't cross those red lines.

President Trump’s red lines are the right ones: - Open the Strait of Hormuz. - Zero enrichment. - Turn over enriched uranium. - Stop funding terrorism. Iran does not need enrichment for civilian nuclear energy. It needs enrichment for one thing: building a nuclear weapon. Secretary Rubio and I discussed how to ensure Iran understands it can't cross those red lines.

Senator Ted Cruz

83,342 views • 2 months ago

The MOU is all carrots, no sticks. And the administration lied all week claiming the leaked versions weren’t the actual deal because they knew it was so terrible. Trump’s only choice is to blame Vance, which he’ll happily do. Ben Shapiro called it a “disaster.” Bill Cassidy called it “the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.” The agreement includes sanctions relief, oil export waivers, the release of frozen assets, and a $300 billion reconstruction commitment, while many of the administration’s original objectives remain unresolved or discarded. It’s bad!

The MOU is all carrots, no sticks. And the administration lied all week claiming the leaked versions weren’t the actual deal because they knew it was so terrible. Trump’s only choice is to blame Vance, which he’ll happily do. Ben Shapiro called it a “disaster.” Bill Cassidy called it “the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.” The agreement includes sanctions relief, oil export waivers, the release of frozen assets, and a $300 billion reconstruction commitment, while many of the administration’s original objectives remain unresolved or discarded. It’s bad!

Jessica Tarlov

360,757 views • 2 months ago

Mark Levin on Iran: “A Deal Won’t Change the Regime” Mark Levin argued that even the “best deal ever” would not fundamentally change Iran’s leadership or ideology. He questioned why the regime would agree to give up nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, and regional influence, and said past agreements show Tehran does not consistently honor commitments. Levin pointed to Iran’s uranium enrichment increases, expanded stockpiles, use of advanced centrifuges, and limits placed on international inspectors after the 2018 U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal. His central argument: the issue is not the quality of a deal, but whether the regime itself would abide by one. President Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump Mark R. Levin #KingRezaPahlavi #RezaPahlaviForIran #IranRevolution2026‌ #IranMassacre

Mark Levin on Iran: “A Deal Won’t Change the Regime” Mark Levin argued that even the “best deal ever” would not fundamentally change Iran’s leadership or ideology. He questioned why the regime would agree to give up nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, and regional influence, and said past agreements show Tehran does not consistently honor commitments. Levin pointed to Iran’s uranium enrichment increases, expanded stockpiles, use of advanced centrifuges, and limits placed on international inspectors after the 2018 U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal. His central argument: the issue is not the quality of a deal, but whether the regime itself would abide by one. President Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump Mark R. Levin #KingRezaPahlavi #RezaPahlaviForIran #IranRevolution2026‌ #IranMassacre

Shahinlooo

13,204 views • 5 months ago

🚨 DONALD TRUMP IS ON THE VERGE OF A DEAL WITH IRAN And it includes a uranium enrichment MORATORIUM on the regime "Reports indicate a one-page memorandum of understanding is close to being reached between the United States and Iran. Axios reports this would include a uranium enrichment moratorium, as well as the eventual opening of the Strait of Hormuz." — Trey Yingst 47's leverage is paying off!

🚨 DONALD TRUMP IS ON THE VERGE OF A DEAL WITH IRAN And it includes a uranium enrichment MORATORIUM on the regime "Reports indicate a one-page memorandum of understanding is close to being reached between the United States and Iran. Axios reports this would include a uranium enrichment moratorium, as well as the eventual opening of the Strait of Hormuz." — Trey Yingst 47's leverage is paying off!

Eric Daugherty

34,989 views • 3 months ago

"We are calling uncle right now. I don't see how that can be spun into a victory. It seems to me that the congressman who said the worst foreign policy blunder ever, or in a generation is probably correct." Geraldo Rivera

"We are calling uncle right now. I don't see how that can be spun into a victory. It seems to me that the congressman who said the worst foreign policy blunder ever, or in a generation is probably correct." Geraldo Rivera

Laura Coates

32,034 views • 2 months ago

Sen. Tim Kaine says that ending the Iran nuclear deal “will go down in history as one of the worst” foreign policy decisions by a U.S. president: “If you make diplomacy impossible, you tend to make war inevitable."

Sen. Tim Kaine says that ending the Iran nuclear deal “will go down in history as one of the worst” foreign policy decisions by a U.S. president: “If you make diplomacy impossible, you tend to make war inevitable."

This Week

12,503 views • 4 months ago

NEW 🇮🇷🇺🇸: MAJOR Updates from JD Vance and Sources on U.S. and Iran Deal VP JD Vance to Fox News: We have made significant progress in the talks with Iran. Bloomberg: Iran and the U.S. are in Talks for Round 2 of Negotiations to Reach a Long-Term Ceasefire New York Time: At the Islamabad talks, the US demanded Iran halt uranium enrichment for 20 years; Iran offered up to five. The US also wants enriched uranium removed, while Iran insists on keeping it but diluting it. My reports were accurate. New image below from the Iranian Delegation at the Pakistan talks. I wonder how many gallons of tea they drank during the 25 hours of talks.

NEW 🇮🇷🇺🇸: MAJOR Updates from JD Vance and Sources on U.S. and Iran Deal VP JD Vance to Fox News: We have made significant progress in the talks with Iran. Bloomberg: Iran and the U.S. are in Talks for Round 2 of Negotiations to Reach a Long-Term Ceasefire New York Time: At the Islamabad talks, the US demanded Iran halt uranium enrichment for 20 years; Iran offered up to five. The US also wants enriched uranium removed, while Iran insists on keeping it but diluting it. My reports were accurate. New image below from the Iranian Delegation at the Pakistan talks. I wonder how many gallons of tea they drank during the 25 hours of talks.

Ryan Rozbiani

38,594 views • 4 months ago

Iran's BLAMES The U.S. for Every MOU Breach Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed that the U.S. broke the Memorandum of Understanding first: "They had so little patience in breaking the agreement that they did not even allow the one-month timeframe foreseen in Clause Five to pass." He made clear Iran's suspensions are RESPONSES, not violations. "No one can accuse the Islamic Republic of Iran of violating the agreement. Wherever the other side violated it, we too suspended our commitments." Commitment for COMMITMENT. Iran will keep the deal exactly as long as Washington does.

Iran's BLAMES The U.S. for Every MOU Breach Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed that the U.S. broke the Memorandum of Understanding first: "They had so little patience in breaking the agreement that they did not even allow the one-month timeframe foreseen in Clause Five to pass." He made clear Iran's suspensions are RESPONSES, not violations. "No one can accuse the Islamic Republic of Iran of violating the agreement. Wherever the other side violated it, we too suspended our commitments." Commitment for COMMITMENT. Iran will keep the deal exactly as long as Washington does.

Ryan Rozbiani

43,103 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 MARCO RUBIO JUST SAID ON THE IRAN DEAL: "WE HAVE NOT REACHED THE GOAL YET. THERE HAS BEEN SOME PROGRESS, BUT I DON’T WANT TO EXAGGERATE IT." SOURCES RERORT THAT SIDES CAN'T FIND COMPROMISE ON THE HORMUZ AND URANIUM ENRICHMENT SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS HAPPENING...

🚨 BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 MARCO RUBIO JUST SAID ON THE IRAN DEAL: "WE HAVE NOT REACHED THE GOAL YET. THERE HAS BEEN SOME PROGRESS, BUT I DON’T WANT TO EXAGGERATE IT." SOURCES RERORT THAT SIDES CAN'T FIND COMPROMISE ON THE HORMUZ AND URANIUM ENRICHMENT SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS HAPPENING...

ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ

35,963 views • 3 months ago

All weekend, the legacy media couldn’t help themselves: they saw Trump, looked at the word “deal,” and said, “Obama made a deal too!” But this isn’t about who “made a deal" first. It’s about what the deal allowed. Obama built a system where Iran could keep enriching uranium, with limits. Trump rejected that entire premise: NO enrichment. That’s not the same strategy. Not even close.

All weekend, the legacy media couldn’t help themselves: they saw Trump, looked at the word “deal,” and said, “Obama made a deal too!” But this isn’t about who “made a deal" first. It’s about what the deal allowed. Obama built a system where Iran could keep enriching uranium, with limits. Trump rejected that entire premise: NO enrichment. That’s not the same strategy. Not even close.

Glenn Beck

73,276 views • 5 months ago

🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 Israeli Ambassador Leiter on the U.S.-Iran deal: "This is clearly an agreement to get the Strait open. This is not an agreement to end the nuclear weaponization of Iran." Even Israel's Defense Minister Katz basically said the same, it's about U.S. priorities. Not blaming it. Writer: Lucas

🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 Israeli Ambassador Leiter on the U.S.-Iran deal: "This is clearly an agreement to get the Strait open. This is not an agreement to end the nuclear weaponization of Iran." Even Israel's Defense Minister Katz basically said the same, it's about U.S. priorities. Not blaming it. Writer: Lucas

Mario Nawfal

57,369 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING | From a source close to the IRGC to Channel 14: Understandings: • 60% enriched uranium: dilution or removal is on the table – not yet approved by Mojtaba • Proxies: Iran would not arm them – only financial or humanitarian support • Ballistic missiles: not yet deeply discussed – assessment that a solution will be found • Enrichment: the key issue – if resolved, the rest can be addressed Gaps: • U.S. demand: zero enrichment on Iranian soil • Dismantling of all enrichment sites and centrifuges • Zero centrifuge R&D • Despite claims of a disconnect – Araghchi remains in contact with the Americans, but no breakthrough • Iranian assessment: Washington is trying to portray them as rejecting a deal Money: • Understandings on a mechanism to release frozen funds and lift sanctions • The release would be gradual and tied to implementation phases • In practice: gaps with the U.S. remain significant Bottom line: Araghchi and Ghalibaf support a deal – the final decision rests with the IRGC commander.

BREAKING | From a source close to the IRGC to Channel 14: Understandings: • 60% enriched uranium: dilution or removal is on the table – not yet approved by Mojtaba • Proxies: Iran would not arm them – only financial or humanitarian support • Ballistic missiles: not yet deeply discussed – assessment that a solution will be found • Enrichment: the key issue – if resolved, the rest can be addressed Gaps: • U.S. demand: zero enrichment on Iranian soil • Dismantling of all enrichment sites and centrifuges • Zero centrifuge R&D • Despite claims of a disconnect – Araghchi remains in contact with the Americans, but no breakthrough • Iranian assessment: Washington is trying to portray them as rejecting a deal Money: • Understandings on a mechanism to release frozen funds and lift sanctions • The release would be gradual and tied to implementation phases • In practice: gaps with the U.S. remain significant Bottom line: Araghchi and Ghalibaf support a deal – the final decision rests with the IRGC commander.

דרור בלאזאדה | Dror Balazada

58,301 views • 4 months ago

Danny Citrinowicz previously led the Iran branch in the IDF’s Military Intelligence Directorate. He argued on CNN that Israel does not actually want a deal with Iran: “For Israel, no deal is better than a bad deal.” Key Points: ▪️He believes Israel is pressuring Trump not to sign an agreement because a deal would block Israel from continuing or restarting attacks on Iran. ▪️Citrinowicz argues that Benjamin Netanyahu cannot openly confront Donald Trump the way he publicly fought Barack Obama over the JCPOA, meaning that if Trump ultimately signs a deal with Iran, Israel could find itself politically stuck with an agreement it opposes. Once Trump backs a deal, Israel would have far less ability to politically undermine it inside the United States or mobilize any kind of opposition in U.S. political circles in the future. ▪️ He says Trump faces a choice: either continue pursuing maximalist demands and escalation, or accept compromise and Iran’s right to enrich uranium under restrictions. ▪️ He repeatedly also says Iran will not capitulate, even under blockade and economic pressure. So the Israeli preference for maximalist demands like “zero enrichment” makes an agreement impossible. ▪️ Citrinowicz says the war failed strategically because Iran’s core nuclear red lines did not change after 39 days of fighting.

Danny Citrinowicz previously led the Iran branch in the IDF’s Military Intelligence Directorate. He argued on CNN that Israel does not actually want a deal with Iran: “For Israel, no deal is better than a bad deal.” Key Points: ▪️He believes Israel is pressuring Trump not to sign an agreement because a deal would block Israel from continuing or restarting attacks on Iran. ▪️Citrinowicz argues that Benjamin Netanyahu cannot openly confront Donald Trump the way he publicly fought Barack Obama over the JCPOA, meaning that if Trump ultimately signs a deal with Iran, Israel could find itself politically stuck with an agreement it opposes. Once Trump backs a deal, Israel would have far less ability to politically undermine it inside the United States or mobilize any kind of opposition in U.S. political circles in the future. ▪️ He says Trump faces a choice: either continue pursuing maximalist demands and escalation, or accept compromise and Iran’s right to enrich uranium under restrictions. ▪️ He repeatedly also says Iran will not capitulate, even under blockade and economic pressure. So the Israeli preference for maximalist demands like “zero enrichment” makes an agreement impossible. ▪️ Citrinowicz says the war failed strategically because Iran’s core nuclear red lines did not change after 39 days of fighting.

Drop Site

91,892 views • 3 months ago

In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I push back on claims that Israel pressured the U.S. into war with Iran and explain the reality of the U.S.–Israel alliance and shared national security interests. From the 1979 hostage crisis to ongoing attacks on Americans, this is about Iran’s long history of terrorism, nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, and why the threat extends far beyond Israel. Topics include Trump, Iran, Israel, Middle East policy, terrorism, nuclear weapons, and U.S. foreign policy. Watch the entire episode; Rumble: YouTube:

In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I push back on claims that Israel pressured the U.S. into war with Iran and explain the reality of the U.S.–Israel alliance and shared national security interests. From the 1979 hostage crisis to ongoing attacks on Americans, this is about Iran’s long history of terrorism, nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, and why the threat extends far beyond Israel. Topics include Trump, Iran, Israel, Middle East policy, terrorism, nuclear weapons, and U.S. foreign policy. Watch the entire episode; Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

41,107 views • 5 months ago