正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

‼️BREAKING: The Pentagon’s ANSWER To A 19-Year-Old Jumping Off The USS Abraham Lincoln Is To CHARGE Him A 19-year-old sailor on the USS Abraham Lincoln went over the side. That ship just came off a record deployment in a war the country was never honestly briefed on. The reports...

40,288 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 次观看 • 18 天前

‼️NEW NAVY MEMO: Orders EVERY Sailor, Marine, and Family Member's Social Media Page LOCKED Down And Scrubbed — Sailors Phones May Even Be CONFISACATED😤 CENTCOM commander Admiral Brad Cooper drafted with a memo telling sailors, Marines, and their families to lock every profile and scrub every trace of service. The Navy did not wake up scared of Tehran this week. They woke up scared of a leak. The USS Abraham Lincoln is finally heading home after nine months in the Middle East, and the first port stop — Thailand — did not come from a Pentagon briefing. It came from sailors’ texts and family pages. That story hit. Then the stern memos hit. Now they want every sailor, Marine, and family account locked down and scrubbed of any military tie. CENTCOM commander Admiral Brad Cooper’s memo goes further: some troops in the Middle East may have to surrender their cell phones. They will tell you this is about Iran mining “pattern of life.” but the hostile actors they want offline is the press — and any sailor still able to text the truth home. This blast went out after the Lincoln’s movement and the conditions on that boat started traveling through family feeds and reporters. Journalists were connecting names to a ship in an Iran fight. Sailors were talking. The answer was not fix the treatment. The answer was wipe the internet and confiscate the phones. If the priority was dignity, you would treat the crew like human beings and let them tell their families where they are going after nine months at sea. Instead they are closing the only channel enlisted people have left. A memo that threatens to seize every sailor’s phone is not force protection. It is a gag. They would rather hide how those ships are being run than risk another leak. That should make you furious.

Project Constitution

86,061 次观看 • 23 天前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally assaulted a 19-year-old U.S. citizen, and then kidnapped him, while admitting on camera they didn’t even know who he was, in Olathe, Kansas. In the video, an agent is sitting on the teenager’s back as his 14-year-old brother screams that he’s a U.S. citizen, in a Walmart parking lot. The agent responds: “Well, we’re going to find that out since whoever drives this [pointing to the truck] isn’t.” That sentence is the admission. Because it shows the only thing they knew, at that moment, was something about the registered owner of the truck… not the person they had pinned to the pavement. Vehicle registration tells you who owns a car. It does NOT tell you who is driving it. Before law enforcement can detain someone, they need individualized reasonable suspicion tied to that person. If they had not confirmed the driver matched the registered owner… If they had not observed a crime… If they had no warrant… Then pinning him down, handcuffing him, and loading him into a vehicle raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You don’t get to tackle someone first and figure out who they are later. You don’t get to use force based on “we’ll find out.” The issue isn’t just that he’s a U.S. citizen… The issue is whether agents had lawful, INDIVIDUALIZED suspicion to detain him before they used force. Because when law enforcement starts treating vehicle registration as automatic suspicion for whoever is behind the wheel… That’s collective punishment. And the Constitution does not allow that.

Jesus Freakin Congress

397,279 次观看 • 7 个月前

CBC spent a 9/11 commemoration in Gander treating the invited U.S. ambassador as the story Pete Hoekstra said the day was about the dead, the stranded passengers, and the town that took them in. CBC kept steering it back to tariffs, “51st state” talk, and whether he should have been allowed in the building. That is not reporting a ceremony. That is using a memorial as a vehicle The transcripts are not subtle. Anchors and reporters loop the same lines: he has “drawn the ire,” he is “Trump’s man,” some people “don’t even want him here,” there was a petition, Gander had to issue a statement that September 11 is bigger than politics. Then they cut to Hoekstra saying, again, that this is about thanking Gander and that the economic fight can wait. CBC treats that answer as an obstacle to be worked around rather than the point of the day That pattern is the inflammatory part. A publicly funded broadcaster with a large older audience does not have to invent a trade war. It only has to keep naming the ambassador, the tariffs, and the sovereignty rhetoric in the same breath as a 25-year-old act of hospitality. Viewers who already dislike the administration get a fresh reason to stay angry. Viewers who came for the history get the current fight instead. The town’s organizers wanted the focus on 2001. The coverage did not Gander’s record that week was practical and decent: planes on the ground, people housed, fed, and treated as guests. Turning the anniversary into another round of “can you believe they invited him” is the opposite of that instinct. If the relationship is strained, the strain is not clarified by making a memorial the latest venue for it. CBC chose to inflame anyway Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

17,499 次观看 • 7 天前

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,693 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Horse That Once Collapsed and the Change No One Could Have Expected 🐎💗 When the rescuers first saw that horse, they almost did not know what to think. He was so thin that his bones showed clearly beneath the skin. His four legs were spread wide to keep his balance, his body swaying, and he nearly fell into the trailer. Looking at him, one had the feeling that just a little more and he would no longer have the strength to stand. They brought him to the foster home with worry. A horse that has become so weak and has been down for too long can face many difficulties getting back on his feet. No one knew how far he would recover. Then the next morning, when the stall door opened, the caregivers saw something that took them by surprise. The horse was standing. He was not only standing on his own legs but also pawing the ground, as if waiting for the caregiver to bring him food. It was a small sign, but a very important one. He still had strength. And he still wanted to eat. From there, the recovery process began with the most ordinary things. He was given enough food and water, a safe place to rest, and caregivers who monitored his condition every day. No change happened overnight. His health returned little by little. His body gradually filled out. He stood more steadily, moved more, and finally was able to run across the pasture. Looking at that image, it is hard to connect it with the horse that once could barely stand beside the trailer. But the most thought-provoking part of this story is not how much he changed. It is that the rescuers did not know the outcome in advance. They could not be sure the horse would recover. They simply saw an animal in very poor condition who still had a chance, and they decided to give him that chance. Perhaps we humans often make a similar mistake: looking at someone in their hardest moment and thinking that is who they are, or that is where their story will end. But one bad day is not always an entire life. This horse did not need a miracle to begin changing. He needed food, water, care, and time. The rest, his body found on its own. And then one day, the horse that once had only enough strength to lean against a trailer was able to run across the pasture. Perhaps that is the most memorable image of this story: not a life that was turned into something else, but a life that was given the chance to return to itself.

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

15,983 次观看 • 25 天前