Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 BREAKING: There is seemingly ONE SINGLE JUROR that is flat out REFUSING to follow instructions from the judge The judge spoke with EACH juror individually, and sent them BACK to deliberate DO NOT allow Clancy to walk!

Nick Sortor

1,600,343 subscribers

578,501 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨; There is one juror who is holding out against 11 jurors who are in favor of not guilty (straight up) in the Lindsay Clancy case. Oh my word. This is incredible. Reddington wants the juror removed (judge denied). Jury was given "reasonable doubt" instruction and sent back to deliberate further.

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨; There is one juror who is holding out against 11 jurors who are in favor of not guilty (straight up) in the Lindsay Clancy case. Oh my word. This is incredible. Reddington wants the juror removed (judge denied). Jury was given "reasonable doubt" instruction and sent back to deliberate further.

Grant Smith Ellis

23,861 views • 5 days ago

BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy jury has been dismissed until tomorrow morning. Judge reminds jurors to not watch media coverage: "Remember the instructions." ONE juror is holding out and speculation is rampant that he or she is the ONLY juror willing to vote guilty.

BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy jury has been dismissed until tomorrow morning. Judge reminds jurors to not watch media coverage: "Remember the instructions." ONE juror is holding out and speculation is rampant that he or she is the ONLY juror willing to vote guilty.

LifeNews.com

22,619 views • 5 days ago

Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney Kevin Reddington said there is one juror who is refusing to adhere to Judge William Sullivan's instructions. He has asked the judge to remove the juror who is refusing to listen. "I don't feel it is proper for me to side with one side or the other in deliberations," Sullivan said. Follow live updates:

Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney Kevin Reddington said there is one juror who is refusing to adhere to Judge William Sullivan's instructions. He has asked the judge to remove the juror who is refusing to listen. "I don't feel it is proper for me to side with one side or the other in deliberations," Sullivan said. Follow live updates:

ABC News

66,480 views • 5 days ago

JUST IN - A single juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial is allegedly refusing to listen to the law and instructions by the judge on reasonable doubt, raising the risk of a mistrial. Lindsay Clancy's defense is asking for the juror to be removed.

JUST IN - A single juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial is allegedly refusing to listen to the law and instructions by the judge on reasonable doubt, raising the risk of a mistrial. Lindsay Clancy's defense is asking for the juror to be removed.

Disclose.tv

2,356,500 views • 5 days ago

ONE JUROR is apparently standing between the Lindsay Clancy trial and a unanimous verdict. Now Clancy’s defense is asking the judge to remove that holdout, accusing them of disregarding the court’s instructions.

ONE JUROR is apparently standing between the Lindsay Clancy trial and a unanimous verdict. Now Clancy’s defense is asking the judge to remove that holdout, accusing them of disregarding the court’s instructions.

Real America's Voice (RAV)

17,141 views • 5 days ago

There is one juror refusing to follow the law as it pertains to reasonable doubt, Judge Sullivan allows the parties to argue on the record. Reddington:

There is one juror refusing to follow the law as it pertains to reasonable doubt, Judge Sullivan allows the parties to argue on the record. Reddington:

Kiki Danger

15,922 views • 5 days ago

🚨 JUST IN: The judge has just sent the Lindsay Clancy jury to DELIBERATE for the 7TH DAY after the defense tried viciously to scrutinize and throw out the lone juror holding out against "not guilty" That juror is holding strong! If it stays this way, a mistrial could be coming. Hopefully their personal info stays PRIVATE so the left can't threaten and commit violence 🙏🏻

🚨 JUST IN: The judge has just sent the Lindsay Clancy jury to DELIBERATE for the 7TH DAY after the defense tried viciously to scrutinize and throw out the lone juror holding out against "not guilty" That juror is holding strong! If it stays this way, a mistrial could be coming. Hopefully their personal info stays PRIVATE so the left can't threaten and commit violence 🙏🏻

Eric Daugherty

276,118 views • 4 days ago

LINDSAY CLANCY DEFENSE ACCUSES JUROR OF LYING UNDER OATH A dramatic exchange erupts in the Lindsay Clancy trial as defense attorney Kevin Reddington accuses a juror of lying under oath and refusing to apply the court’s reasonable doubt instructions. The defense claims the jury is essentially “11 to 1” and argues that one juror has acknowledged doubt but is refusing to apply it when considering a not guilty verdict. Reddington tells the judge the alleged conduct goes beyond a disagreement during deliberations, accusing the juror of making a false statement under oath The judge is asked to intervene as the jury remains deadlocked. For more updates, watch OAN on OAN Live.

LINDSAY CLANCY DEFENSE ACCUSES JUROR OF LYING UNDER OATH A dramatic exchange erupts in the Lindsay Clancy trial as defense attorney Kevin Reddington accuses a juror of lying under oath and refusing to apply the court’s reasonable doubt instructions. The defense claims the jury is essentially “11 to 1” and argues that one juror has acknowledged doubt but is refusing to apply it when considering a not guilty verdict. Reddington tells the judge the alleged conduct goes beyond a disagreement during deliberations, accusing the juror of making a false statement under oath The judge is asked to intervene as the jury remains deadlocked. For more updates, watch OAN on OAN Live.

One America News

34,361 views • 4 days ago

BREAKING: The foreperson in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial just delivered a note asking for one juror to be removed for not following the rules regarding the law's definition of reasonable doubt. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington then asked for that juror to be removed. The prosecution, however, stated that it felt the judge's instructions to the jury were sufficient, and the existing jury is now continuing to deliberate, as instructed by the judge.

BREAKING: The foreperson in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial just delivered a note asking for one juror to be removed for not following the rules regarding the law's definition of reasonable doubt. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington then asked for that juror to be removed. The prosecution, however, stated that it felt the judge's instructions to the jury were sufficient, and the existing jury is now continuing to deliberate, as instructed by the judge.

CBS News

293,207 views • 5 days ago

Judge, prosecution and defense get heated in discussion over foreperson's note saying one juror is refusing to follow Massachusetts law in application of the principle of "reasonable doubt" in Lindsay Clancy case.

Judge, prosecution and defense get heated in discussion over foreperson's note saying one juror is refusing to follow Massachusetts law in application of the principle of "reasonable doubt" in Lindsay Clancy case.

Libby Emmons

17,908 views • 4 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy case is ADMONISHING jurors who are REFUSING to follow his instructions It sounds like there is a DISPUTE among jurors. He is NOT declaring a mistrial. "First off, I want to remind you that you are REQUIRED to follow my instructions on the law as I gave them to you." The judge is reminding them what REASONABLE DOUBT actually means. It's clear there are certain jurors simply REFUSING to take their role as impartial jurors seriously.

🚨 BREAKING: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy case is ADMONISHING jurors who are REFUSING to follow his instructions It sounds like there is a DISPUTE among jurors. He is NOT declaring a mistrial. "First off, I want to remind you that you are REQUIRED to follow my instructions on the law as I gave them to you." The judge is reminding them what REASONABLE DOUBT actually means. It's clear there are certain jurors simply REFUSING to take their role as impartial jurors seriously.

Nick Sortor

5,062,516 views • 5 days ago

🚨 JUST IN: The Lindsay Clancy prosecution is FIRING BACK at the defense's attempts to dismiss the one lone juror She says it's time to get back to deliberations and that the juror has NO reason to be removed or scrutinized HOLD OUT FOR JUSTICE! That one juror has a lot of pressure.

🚨 JUST IN: The Lindsay Clancy prosecution is FIRING BACK at the defense's attempts to dismiss the one lone juror She says it's time to get back to deliberations and that the juror has NO reason to be removed or scrutinized HOLD OUT FOR JUSTICE! That one juror has a lot of pressure.

Eric Daugherty

43,335 views • 4 days ago

This is wild NBC reporter Laura Jarrett seems to agree that the one juror who’s holding up the verdict and will likely be the only one to find Lindsay Clancy guilty should be removed “Why wouldn't the judge just remove that one juror — if there is any suggestion at all that that juror is not able to follow the law, why wouldn't the judge just entertain the defense motion to remove that jury — I mean, these jurors have been at this for days now, right? Don't the rest of the jurors, sort of get some benefit of the doubt for trying to follow the law, but they're being held up by one person who refuses to?” The one juror isn’t refusing to follow the law, the juror likely is the only one who doesn’t see reasonable doubt and knows she’s guilty This woman murdered her 3 children To be crystal clear, Lindsay Clancy admitted that she killed her three children by strangling them with exercise bands in the basement of their Duxbury, Massachusetts home Her attorneys have repeatedly stated she does not dispute killing the children

This is wild NBC reporter Laura Jarrett seems to agree that the one juror who’s holding up the verdict and will likely be the only one to find Lindsay Clancy guilty should be removed “Why wouldn't the judge just remove that one juror — if there is any suggestion at all that that juror is not able to follow the law, why wouldn't the judge just entertain the defense motion to remove that jury — I mean, these jurors have been at this for days now, right? Don't the rest of the jurors, sort of get some benefit of the doubt for trying to follow the law, but they're being held up by one person who refuses to?” The one juror isn’t refusing to follow the law, the juror likely is the only one who doesn’t see reasonable doubt and knows she’s guilty This woman murdered her 3 children To be crystal clear, Lindsay Clancy admitted that she killed her three children by strangling them with exercise bands in the basement of their Duxbury, Massachusetts home Her attorneys have repeatedly stated she does not dispute killing the children

Wall Street Apes

422,199 views • 5 days ago

🚨 BREAKING — IT'S OFFICIAL: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy trial has declared a MISTRIAL after a LONE MALE juror BLOCKED a NOT GUILTY VERDICT for Clancy This man is an absolute HERO! THANK YOU for REFUSING to give in to the DERANGED jurors trying to let a baby kiIIer go free!

🚨 BREAKING — IT'S OFFICIAL: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy trial has declared a MISTRIAL after a LONE MALE juror BLOCKED a NOT GUILTY VERDICT for Clancy This man is an absolute HERO! THANK YOU for REFUSING to give in to the DERANGED jurors trying to let a baby kiIIer go free!

Nick Sortor

4,860,439 views • 4 days ago

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer is now screaming at the judge in the courtroom after the judge refused to remove the 1 male juror who is holding out from voting not guilty

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer is now screaming at the judge in the courtroom after the judge refused to remove the 1 male juror who is holding out from voting not guilty

Jack Posobiec

1,541,817 views • 4 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy m*rder defense attorney just DEMANDED that ONE HOLDOUT JUROR be REMOVED from the jury, accusing that juror of not listening to "reasonable doubt" instructions HOLD THE LINE!! The attorney worries there will be a mistrial, meaning it would GO AGAIN to try and convict her "There's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt...if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame, it's a real shame!"

🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy m*rder defense attorney just DEMANDED that ONE HOLDOUT JUROR be REMOVED from the jury, accusing that juror of not listening to "reasonable doubt" instructions HOLD THE LINE!! The attorney worries there will be a mistrial, meaning it would GO AGAIN to try and convict her "There's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt...if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame, it's a real shame!"

Eric Daugherty

4,171,039 views • 5 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy m*rder trial jury says they're UNABLE TO REACH a unanimous decision You gotta be freaking kidding... ...she killed her kids. The evidence is clear. Juror, or jurors, are HOLDING OUT The judge is now asking them to go back and CONTINUE deliberating THIS IS TOTAL MADNESS!! They want to show her mercy!

🚨 BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy m*rder trial jury says they're UNABLE TO REACH a unanimous decision You gotta be freaking kidding... ...she killed her kids. The evidence is clear. Juror, or jurors, are HOLDING OUT The judge is now asking them to go back and CONTINUE deliberating THIS IS TOTAL MADNESS!! They want to show her mercy!

Eric Daugherty

456,354 views • 7 days ago

#BREAKING: Judge William Sullivan officially declares a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, after one juror reportedly was holding out against a not-guilty verdict

#BREAKING: Judge William Sullivan officially declares a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, after one juror reportedly was holding out against a not-guilty verdict

Curtis Houck

34,975 views • 4 days ago

Wow! It appears as though there is only 1 juror who is preventing the jury from finding Lindsey Clancy NOT GUILTY by reason of insanity. 1 Juror out of all of them is all that is apparently preventing Lindsey Clancy from getting off.

Wow! It appears as though there is only 1 juror who is preventing the jury from finding Lindsey Clancy NOT GUILTY by reason of insanity. 1 Juror out of all of them is all that is apparently preventing Lindsey Clancy from getting off.

Ed Krassenstein

114,150 views • 5 days ago

AUDACITY! Defense council Reddington tells judge to “listen to my instructions” and give the jury instructions “forcefully”. “What do you want me to do? Get a brass band?” the judge replies. Reddington then accuses the judge of “glossing over” the issue. Holy cow. I will also not be shocked to discover some collusion between the juror four person and Reddington / his team. This is wild.

AUDACITY! Defense council Reddington tells judge to “listen to my instructions” and give the jury instructions “forcefully”. “What do you want me to do? Get a brass band?” the judge replies. Reddington then accuses the judge of “glossing over” the issue. Holy cow. I will also not be shocked to discover some collusion between the juror four person and Reddington / his team. This is wild.

Viva Frei

65,095 views • 4 days ago