正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

BREAKING: This Is A Pretty Stunning Contradiction. In June, the administration repeatedly described Iran's nuclear infrastructure as "obliterated." Now comes a different reality. According to international monitors cited by 60 Minutes, Iran still possesses more than 970 pounds of near-bomb-grade uranium. That's enough material to keep the nuclear question...

allenanalysis's profile picture

Brian Allen

301,230 subscribers

43,623 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"A week ago Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon. Now, Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they have, because we destroyed it." So, now that's been solved, we are never going to hear about Iran's nuclear threat again, right? Right?
0:52

"A week ago Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon. Now, Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they have, because we destroyed it." So, now that's been solved, we are never going to hear about Iran's nuclear threat again, right? Right?

Margarita Simonyan

187,550 次观看 • 1 年前

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright tells Margaret Brennan that the Trump administration’s military objectives in Iran “are achieved,” but “the ending of the Iranian nuclear program is a different matter, and that's what still needs to be achieved.” “We will have an end to the Iranian nuclear program,” he says. “The endpoint we know. The route, we don't.”
1:44

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright tells Margaret Brennan that the Trump administration’s military objectives in Iran “are achieved,” but “the ending of the Iranian nuclear program is a different matter, and that's what still needs to be achieved.” “We will have an end to the Iranian nuclear program,” he says. “The endpoint we know. The route, we don't.”

Face The Nation

14,290 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇮🇱🇮🇷 "IRAN WAS DAYS AWAY FROM MAKING A NUCLEAR BOMB" IDF International Spokesperson: “We saw Iran specifically taking steps to advance the nuclear bomb. They were days away from having a nuclear weapon, which is an Israeli problem, but it’s [also] a problem for all the world. If Iran has a nuclear weapon, that's a problem. If we don’t have this preemptive operation now, we’re gonna have to have a much larger war in the future, and that war in the future, Iran is gonna have a nuclear weapon.” Source: My interview with IDF Spokesperson LTC Nadav Shoshani (below)
3:29

🇮🇱🇮🇷 "IRAN WAS DAYS AWAY FROM MAKING A NUCLEAR BOMB" IDF International Spokesperson: “We saw Iran specifically taking steps to advance the nuclear bomb. They were days away from having a nuclear weapon, which is an Israeli problem, but it’s [also] a problem for all the world. If Iran has a nuclear weapon, that's a problem. If we don’t have this preemptive operation now, we’re gonna have to have a much larger war in the future, and that war in the future, Iran is gonna have a nuclear weapon.” Source: My interview with IDF Spokesperson LTC Nadav Shoshani (below)

Mario Nawfal

439,921 次观看 • 1 年前

Van Hollen: "Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is necessary in order for us to win, right?" Hegseth: "You asked me what the overarching objective is, and I would say ensuring Iran never has a nuclear weapon." Van Hollen: "You said after Midnight Hammer, 'Our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' Clearly that is not the case based on your testimony today. It's also a fact that the DNI Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of the Intelligence Committee that it was our assessment that Iran did not intend to restart its nuclear program. The President of the United States just about a week ago said Iran has committed not to develop a nuclear weapon."
1:10

Van Hollen: "Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is necessary in order for us to win, right?" Hegseth: "You asked me what the overarching objective is, and I would say ensuring Iran never has a nuclear weapon." Van Hollen: "You said after Midnight Hammer, 'Our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' Clearly that is not the case based on your testimony today. It's also a fact that the DNI Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of the Intelligence Committee that it was our assessment that Iran did not intend to restart its nuclear program. The President of the United States just about a week ago said Iran has committed not to develop a nuclear weapon."

The Bulwark

607,873 次观看 • 2 个月前

During the VP debate in 2024, Margaret Brennan stated as fact that Iran was less than two weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon. Immediately after we bombed Iran's nuclear facilities in 2025, Brennan began arguing that Iran was not close to developing a nuclear weapon. Completely different positions based off of completely different info, all because the Trump Admin did something and her job is to be adversarial and oppose everything they do.
1:37

During the VP debate in 2024, Margaret Brennan stated as fact that Iran was less than two weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon. Immediately after we bombed Iran's nuclear facilities in 2025, Brennan began arguing that Iran was not close to developing a nuclear weapon. Completely different positions based off of completely different info, all because the Trump Admin did something and her job is to be adversarial and oppose everything they do.

MAZE

476,855 次观看 • 12 天前

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The threat of a nuclear "red line" being crossed is no longer just a hypothetical scenario. General Wesley Clark admits that Iran building a nuke right now would be a "rational response" to seeing the U.S. and Israel push them into a corner. Gen. Clark suggested there's finally no reason to be in doubt about what Iran's nuclear ambitions are. "I wouldn't be surprised if Iran is building a nuke right now." Wes Clark
2:19

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The threat of a nuclear "red line" being crossed is no longer just a hypothetical scenario. General Wesley Clark admits that Iran building a nuke right now would be a "rational response" to seeing the U.S. and Israel push them into a corner. Gen. Clark suggested there's finally no reason to be in doubt about what Iran's nuclear ambitions are. "I wouldn't be surprised if Iran is building a nuke right now." Wes Clark

Mario Nawfal

29,464 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 This Was The Most Revealing Exchange In Hegseth’s 60 Minutes Interview. Pete Hegseth defended the new Iran agreement by saying the document guarantees Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, never seek one, and never obtain one. Then came Brennan’s response: The Obama-era JCPOA said that too. Notice what happened next. Hegseth didn’t argue that Brennan was wrong. He didn’t say the provision was new. Instead, he argued the difference was that this agreement was negotiated “from a position of strength.” Not whether Iran promised not to build a nuclear weapon. Both sides appear to agree similar language existed before. The disagreement is whether military pressure and leverage make this agreement more durable than the one Trump withdrew from.
1:30

🚨 This Was The Most Revealing Exchange In Hegseth’s 60 Minutes Interview. Pete Hegseth defended the new Iran agreement by saying the document guarantees Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, never seek one, and never obtain one. Then came Brennan’s response: The Obama-era JCPOA said that too. Notice what happened next. Hegseth didn’t argue that Brennan was wrong. He didn’t say the provision was new. Instead, he argued the difference was that this agreement was negotiated “from a position of strength.” Not whether Iran promised not to build a nuclear weapon. Both sides appear to agree similar language existed before. The disagreement is whether military pressure and leverage make this agreement more durable than the one Trump withdrew from.

Brian Allen

349,933 次观看 • 3 个月前

President Donald Trump said Thursday that he wouldn’t use a nuclear weapon in Iran and that nobody should be allowed to use them. “We don't need it. Why do I need it? Why would a stupid question like that be asked? Why would I use a nuclear weapon where we've totally in a very conventional way decimated them without it,” Trump said in a response to a question by PBS News’ Liz Landers. “A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody,” he added. Trump has often said that preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is one of the reasons for launching the nearly two-month war. “You cannot give Iran a nuclear weapon. This is all about a nuclear weapon. They cannot have the nuclear bomb, and they're not going to have the nuclear bomb,” Trump said during his appearance Thursday in the Oval Office. Earlier this month, the president threatened that a “whole civilization will die” if Iran didn’t concede to his deadline to make a deal. Trump pulled back from that threat, leading to a temporary ceasefire.
0:42

President Donald Trump said Thursday that he wouldn’t use a nuclear weapon in Iran and that nobody should be allowed to use them. “We don't need it. Why do I need it? Why would a stupid question like that be asked? Why would I use a nuclear weapon where we've totally in a very conventional way decimated them without it,” Trump said in a response to a question by PBS News’ Liz Landers. “A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody,” he added. Trump has often said that preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is one of the reasons for launching the nearly two-month war. “You cannot give Iran a nuclear weapon. This is all about a nuclear weapon. They cannot have the nuclear bomb, and they're not going to have the nuclear bomb,” Trump said during his appearance Thursday in the Oval Office. Earlier this month, the president threatened that a “whole civilization will die” if Iran didn’t concede to his deadline to make a deal. Trump pulled back from that threat, leading to a temporary ceasefire.

PBS News

15,936 次观看 • 5 个月前

WATCH: Secretary Hegseth spars with Democrat Rep. Seth Moulton on the Iran conflict, recalling that the Obama admin's efforts would have allowed Iran to pursue a nuclear weapon: HEGSETH: "Imagine what the world would look like right now if Iran had a nuclear weapon? Which... by the way...Obama was going to allow." MOULTON: "How is this war going? Do you think we're winning?" HEGSETH: "Militarily on the battlefield? It's been an astounding military success." MOULTON: "No. But are we winning the war?" HEGSETH: "Absolutely."
2:12

WATCH: Secretary Hegseth spars with Democrat Rep. Seth Moulton on the Iran conflict, recalling that the Obama admin's efforts would have allowed Iran to pursue a nuclear weapon: HEGSETH: "Imagine what the world would look like right now if Iran had a nuclear weapon? Which... by the way...Obama was going to allow." MOULTON: "How is this war going? Do you think we're winning?" HEGSETH: "Militarily on the battlefield? It's been an astounding military success." MOULTON: "No. But are we winning the war?" HEGSETH: "Absolutely."

Fox News

142,330 次观看 • 5 个月前

BREAKING: "The nuclear weapons program is destroyed. It is gone. If the Iranians decided tomorrow to build a nuclear weapon, they simply don't have the capacity in order to do that." - VP Vance "What we're trying to ensure is they don't rebuild that capacity not just a year from now, two years from now, but many, many years from now, so that our children never have to worry about a state sponsor of terrorism having a nuclear weapon." "You can't tell a country whether Israel or Iran, they're not allowed to have any self-defense... But as part of the final deal, what we want to see is Iran not funding regional instability, funding regional terrorism, and of course, trying to rebuild their nuclear weapons program. That's the main thing."
0:42

BREAKING: "The nuclear weapons program is destroyed. It is gone. If the Iranians decided tomorrow to build a nuclear weapon, they simply don't have the capacity in order to do that." - VP Vance "What we're trying to ensure is they don't rebuild that capacity not just a year from now, two years from now, but many, many years from now, so that our children never have to worry about a state sponsor of terrorism having a nuclear weapon." "You can't tell a country whether Israel or Iran, they're not allowed to have any self-defense... But as part of the final deal, what we want to see is Iran not funding regional instability, funding regional terrorism, and of course, trying to rebuild their nuclear weapons program. That's the main thing."

Fox News

764,720 次观看 • 3 个月前

Adam Schiff thinks Obama's Iran nuclear deal was more than enough to deter Iran from building nukes: Kristen Welker: "Do you agree...that the threat with Iran needed to be dealt with now?" Adam Schiff: "Let's remember, we had a nuclear agreement with Iran that put serious constraints on the Iranian nuclear program, and Donald Trump tore up that agreement. And when you do that, when you essentially say that diplomacy is not the way to resolve this, then that leaves war, and that's what we're encountering now."
0:33

Adam Schiff thinks Obama's Iran nuclear deal was more than enough to deter Iran from building nukes: Kristen Welker: "Do you agree...that the threat with Iran needed to be dealt with now?" Adam Schiff: "Let's remember, we had a nuclear agreement with Iran that put serious constraints on the Iranian nuclear program, and Donald Trump tore up that agreement. And when you do that, when you essentially say that diplomacy is not the way to resolve this, then that leaves war, and that's what we're encountering now."

Julia 🇺🇸

22,432 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨
0:35

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨

🇨🇳 陈杰森 Jason Chen

813,482 次观看 • 6 个月前