Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

💥BREAKING - THIS IS BIG: Catherine Austin Fitts provides bombshell testimony to a court in the Netherlands, who have agreed to hear what may be one of the largest and most important landmark legal cases in recent history. The lawsuit alleges crimes perpetrated worldwide by prominent global figures. *As...

ShaunRickard67's profile picture

Shaun Rickard

49,070 subscribers

378,660 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨COURT OF APPEAL AMSTERDAM LIVE UPDATE🚨 Stassen (Dutch Lawyer) has not held back in Amsterdam Court of Appeal this morning, in the preliminary evidence appeal hearing in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and the Dutch state et al. (explainer video linked below). Peter Stassen told the High Court Justices (of which there are 4) that "Bill gates (a defendant in this case) is part of an elite network who share a 'satanic ideology'." He has directly accused the Dutch state of lying, and stated that the Judiciary is being misled, and while "no one is being prosecuted for the Epstein files - as they 'stick to a mafia type silencing code' - they continue to blame the victims (plaintiffs/claimants) in this case (the covid 'vaccine' injured and bereaved) as the dangerous ones, the liars." Lawyer for the Plaintiffs Peter Stassen states "give me the facts and I will give you the law." He states to the court: "it is important that you take into account alternative facts or you will never get the truth; we are experiencing the greatest crime against humanity and the defendants in this case are the perpetrators of that crime." More to follow. Links below for info. I promise I will follow and report on this case and share everything you need to know! Fiona Rose Diamond #COVIDJustice #Netherlands
4:39

🚨COURT OF APPEAL AMSTERDAM LIVE UPDATE🚨 Stassen (Dutch Lawyer) has not held back in Amsterdam Court of Appeal this morning, in the preliminary evidence appeal hearing in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and the Dutch state et al. (explainer video linked below). Peter Stassen told the High Court Justices (of which there are 4) that "Bill gates (a defendant in this case) is part of an elite network who share a 'satanic ideology'." He has directly accused the Dutch state of lying, and stated that the Judiciary is being misled, and while "no one is being prosecuted for the Epstein files - as they 'stick to a mafia type silencing code' - they continue to blame the victims (plaintiffs/claimants) in this case (the covid 'vaccine' injured and bereaved) as the dangerous ones, the liars." Lawyer for the Plaintiffs Peter Stassen states "give me the facts and I will give you the law." He states to the court: "it is important that you take into account alternative facts or you will never get the truth; we are experiencing the greatest crime against humanity and the defendants in this case are the perpetrators of that crime." More to follow. Links below for info. I promise I will follow and report on this case and share everything you need to know! Fiona Rose Diamond #COVIDJustice #Netherlands

Paul White Gold Eagle

28,019 views • 5 months ago

Alberta-based class-action lawsuit seeks justice for those harmed by COVID-19 vaccines Law firm Rath & Company has filed a class-action lawsuit against the federal and Alberta provincial governments on behalf of Albertans who have suffered debilitating injuries from the COVID-19 vaccines. The lawsuit claims that the governments engaged in “unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair, and deceptive practices” related to the warning, promotion, and distribution of these novel pharmaceutical products. At the heart of the claim is Carrie Sakamoto, a young mother from Lethbridge whose personal vaccine injury 10.5 million-dollar lawsuit pivoted into a class action, representing potentially thousands of Albertans facing debilitating, long-term effects from the widely promoted but highly controversial COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Sakamoto’s legal team, led by lawyers Jeffrey Rath and Eva Chipiuk (Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM), argues that the government intentionally withheld crucial information about the vaccines before mandating them. Rath emphasizes that their case challenges the blanket assumption that the vaccines are safe and effective, and the goal of a trial would be to enter into public record evidence proving otherwise. The lawsuit is scheduled for a case management hearing tomorrow, a crucial step where the key issues in dispute will be identified. However, Rath criticizes this as a “delay tactic” and an “abuse of process.” Chipiuk points to the government's failure to adequately address the severity of vaccine injuries, which have been largely ignored by programs like the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP). This lawsuit is more than just a legal battle — it’s an urgent call for accountability and a potential precedent for future public health responses. As legal action unfolds, will this be Canadians' only hope for the government to take responsibility for the widespread harm caused by its vaccine rollout? REPORT by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦:
10:32

Alberta-based class-action lawsuit seeks justice for those harmed by COVID-19 vaccines Law firm Rath & Company has filed a class-action lawsuit against the federal and Alberta provincial governments on behalf of Albertans who have suffered debilitating injuries from the COVID-19 vaccines. The lawsuit claims that the governments engaged in “unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair, and deceptive practices” related to the warning, promotion, and distribution of these novel pharmaceutical products. At the heart of the claim is Carrie Sakamoto, a young mother from Lethbridge whose personal vaccine injury 10.5 million-dollar lawsuit pivoted into a class action, representing potentially thousands of Albertans facing debilitating, long-term effects from the widely promoted but highly controversial COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Sakamoto’s legal team, led by lawyers Jeffrey Rath and Eva Chipiuk (Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM), argues that the government intentionally withheld crucial information about the vaccines before mandating them. Rath emphasizes that their case challenges the blanket assumption that the vaccines are safe and effective, and the goal of a trial would be to enter into public record evidence proving otherwise. The lawsuit is scheduled for a case management hearing tomorrow, a crucial step where the key issues in dispute will be identified. However, Rath criticizes this as a “delay tactic” and an “abuse of process.” Chipiuk points to the government's failure to adequately address the severity of vaccine injuries, which have been largely ignored by programs like the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP). This lawsuit is more than just a legal battle — it’s an urgent call for accountability and a potential precedent for future public health responses. As legal action unfolds, will this be Canadians' only hope for the government to take responsibility for the widespread harm caused by its vaccine rollout? REPORT by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦:

Rebel News

96,114 views • 1 year ago

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Dutch court orders Bill Gates to stand trial over COVID-19 vaccines. Seven vaccine-injured plaintiffs allege that Bill Gates and others “misled people into taking Covid-19 injections, while they knew or should have known that these injections were not safe and effective.” The lawsuit also targets former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and key members of the Dutch government’s COVID response team. The bombshell came when Gates tried to evade the case by arguing that, as a U.S. citizen, he should not be subject to Dutch legal proceedings. However, the court ruled that due to Gates’ close connection with other defendants under Dutch jurisdiction, he IS subject to trial in the Netherlands. Now, Gates and his legal team must confront these serious allegations in court, with a new hearing set for November 27th of this year. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
2:24

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Dutch court orders Bill Gates to stand trial over COVID-19 vaccines. Seven vaccine-injured plaintiffs allege that Bill Gates and others “misled people into taking Covid-19 injections, while they knew or should have known that these injections were not safe and effective.” The lawsuit also targets former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and key members of the Dutch government’s COVID response team. The bombshell came when Gates tried to evade the case by arguing that, as a U.S. citizen, he should not be subject to Dutch legal proceedings. However, the court ruled that due to Gates’ close connection with other defendants under Dutch jurisdiction, he IS subject to trial in the Netherlands. Now, Gates and his legal team must confront these serious allegations in court, with a new hearing set for November 27th of this year. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

5,320,909 views • 1 year ago

🚨 RFK JR DROPS BOMBSHELL CLAIM Robert F. Kennedy Jr just told a crowd that Bill Gates has been indicted in the Netherlands over alleged statements related to COVID vaccines — and that he may have to face trial. The audience erupted. If accurate, this would be a significant legal development involving one of the most powerful figures in global health and technology. However — and this is critical — claims of indictments involving high-profile individuals often require careful verification because: • Civil cases ≠ criminal indictments • Legal complaints ≠ charges filed by prosecutors • Jurisdiction and legal standards vary by country In recent years, Gates has faced multiple lawsuits and complaints in different jurisdictions related to pandemic policies and vaccine programs, but the legal status of each case depends on court filings and prosecutorial decisions. The key question now: Is this a formal criminal indictment by Dutch authorities — or a legal complaint filed by private parties? Those are very different things legally. Either way, the political significance is obvious. For years, critics have accused global health institutions and pharmaceutical partners of misleading the public. Supporters argue pandemic decisions were made under emergency conditions with evolving science. If any courtroom proceedings move forward, they could become a major flashpoint in the ongoing global debate over pandemic accountability. The next step is simple: Watch the courts. Because rhetoric can move crowds. But only legal evidence moves verdicts.
0:47

🚨 RFK JR DROPS BOMBSHELL CLAIM Robert F. Kennedy Jr just told a crowd that Bill Gates has been indicted in the Netherlands over alleged statements related to COVID vaccines — and that he may have to face trial. The audience erupted. If accurate, this would be a significant legal development involving one of the most powerful figures in global health and technology. However — and this is critical — claims of indictments involving high-profile individuals often require careful verification because: • Civil cases ≠ criminal indictments • Legal complaints ≠ charges filed by prosecutors • Jurisdiction and legal standards vary by country In recent years, Gates has faced multiple lawsuits and complaints in different jurisdictions related to pandemic policies and vaccine programs, but the legal status of each case depends on court filings and prosecutorial decisions. The key question now: Is this a formal criminal indictment by Dutch authorities — or a legal complaint filed by private parties? Those are very different things legally. Either way, the political significance is obvious. For years, critics have accused global health institutions and pharmaceutical partners of misleading the public. Supporters argue pandemic decisions were made under emergency conditions with evolving science. If any courtroom proceedings move forward, they could become a major flashpoint in the ongoing global debate over pandemic accountability. The next step is simple: Watch the courts. Because rhetoric can move crowds. But only legal evidence moves verdicts.

Jim Ferguson

32,883 views • 5 months ago

PFIZER IS IN BIG TROUBLE. NEW interview with Kris Kobach, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, who is suing Pfizer, along with 5 x other American States. He mentions they knew 10% of women had miscarriages: "Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women and they had information in their possession not only of of causing you know grave problems for pregnant rats but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases" TRANSCRIPT FOR CLIP: NEWSMAX "You're suing Pfizer for misleading claims on the covid vaccine sir round of applause for you on this what's this about and what's your case" KRIS KOBACK "Well the case is that Pfizer violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act and by the way all 50 states have some version of a consumer Protection act and while the federal government gave all the vaccine manufacturers immunity from normal tort suits, where someone who's injured would sue the company seeking damages for their injury, the federal government did not give the vaccine manufacturers license to misrepresent or state things that they knew to be false when trying to push their product, and that's what this lawsuit is about" "[Pfizer] made multiple misrepresentations, including saying it was safe for pregnant women, when Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women. And they had information in their possession not only of of causing, you know grave problems for pregnant rats, but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications, including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases..... just think about that a person dies in every miscarriage and yet they proceeded to advertise it as safe for pregnant women". This lawsuit also highlights the amount of ignorance within other government departments, that are still pushing the "safe and effective" narrative on a Global scale. Add on top of the that the more recent accumulating evidence of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, and you have a ticking time bomb for the Pharmaceutical industry
1:25

PFIZER IS IN BIG TROUBLE. NEW interview with Kris Kobach, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, who is suing Pfizer, along with 5 x other American States. He mentions they knew 10% of women had miscarriages: "Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women and they had information in their possession not only of of causing you know grave problems for pregnant rats but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases" TRANSCRIPT FOR CLIP: NEWSMAX "You're suing Pfizer for misleading claims on the covid vaccine sir round of applause for you on this what's this about and what's your case" KRIS KOBACK "Well the case is that Pfizer violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act and by the way all 50 states have some version of a consumer Protection act and while the federal government gave all the vaccine manufacturers immunity from normal tort suits, where someone who's injured would sue the company seeking damages for their injury, the federal government did not give the vaccine manufacturers license to misrepresent or state things that they knew to be false when trying to push their product, and that's what this lawsuit is about" "[Pfizer] made multiple misrepresentations, including saying it was safe for pregnant women, when Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women. And they had information in their possession not only of of causing, you know grave problems for pregnant rats, but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications, including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases..... just think about that a person dies in every miscarriage and yet they proceeded to advertise it as safe for pregnant women". This lawsuit also highlights the amount of ignorance within other government departments, that are still pushing the "safe and effective" narrative on a Global scale. Add on top of the that the more recent accumulating evidence of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, and you have a ticking time bomb for the Pharmaceutical industry

Humanspective

548,782 views • 1 year ago

New Filings in Sean "Diddy" Combs Lawsuit Name Jay-Z as Co-Defendant in Alleged Assault of Minor By Project Constitution In an explosive turn in the legal proceedings against Sean "Diddy" Combs, attorney Tony Buzbee has introduced an amended complaint that now includes Shawn "Jay-Z" Carter as a co-defendant. This amendment alleges a harrowing incident where both Combs and Carter are accused of drugging and raping a then 13-year-old girl at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards (VMA) after-party. The complaint further states that an unnamed female celebrity was present during the assault, witnessing the events without intervention. The plaintiff, identified only as Jane Doe in legal documents, describes in the complaint how she was taken to the after-party after attempting to gain entry to the VMAs without a ticket. According to the allegations, she was given a drink that made her feel disoriented, leading to the assault by Combs and Carter. Adding to the severity of the allegations, the complaint accuses Jay-Z of orchestrating a campaign of harassment, intimidation, and threats against the plaintiff to prevent her from naming him in the lawsuit. This campaign supposedly extended to Buzbee, his family, employees, clients, and former clients, in an attempt to discredit the attorney and undermine the case. Jay-Z responded to these accusations with a vehement denial on X, branding the lawsuit as a blackmail attempt. His response was not only a defense of his own character but also included personal attacks on Buzbee, challenging the validity of his military service and suggesting that the allegations were part of a larger conspiracy for financial gain. Jay-Z's statement was laden with threats of aggressive defense, referencing his upbringing in Brooklyn's "projects" as a testament to his tenacity. He dared the accusers to file criminal charges, rather than a civil lawsuit, if they believed in their claims. In response, Buzbee issued a statement defending his military career and denouncing Jay-Z's tactics as bullying. He interpreted Jay-Z's response as a direct threat but affirmed his commitment to represent his client, stating he would not be intimidated and was prepared to see the case through to the end. The legal landscape got even more intriguing when another media outlet sought comments from the Southern District of New York State Attorney's Office regarding the potential for criminal charges against Jay-Z. The office, which is currently prosecuting Diddy on federal charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, declined to comment, which has been interpreted by some as potentially significant. This case has sparked intense debate about celebrity accountability, the protection of minors, and the ethics of intimidation in legal battles. With Diddy already detained pending his criminal trial, the addition of Jay-Z to this civil lawsuit could have profound implications for both defendants' careers, reputations, and legal standing. Note to Readers: This article is based on the information available as of December 8, 2024. Legal cases can evolve, and we will continue to monitor this one for further developments. #DiddyLawsuit #JayZAccused #TonyBuzbee #VMA2000Scandal #JusticeForJaneDoe #CelebrityAccountability #HarassmentClaims #LegalBattle #IntimidationTactics #SexualAssaultAllegations #EntertainmentIndustry #ProtectMinors #HighProfileCase #NewYorkCourt #CivilLawsuit #CriminalAllegations
20:26

New Filings in Sean "Diddy" Combs Lawsuit Name Jay-Z as Co-Defendant in Alleged Assault of Minor By Project Constitution In an explosive turn in the legal proceedings against Sean "Diddy" Combs, attorney Tony Buzbee has introduced an amended complaint that now includes Shawn "Jay-Z" Carter as a co-defendant. This amendment alleges a harrowing incident where both Combs and Carter are accused of drugging and raping a then 13-year-old girl at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards (VMA) after-party. The complaint further states that an unnamed female celebrity was present during the assault, witnessing the events without intervention. The plaintiff, identified only as Jane Doe in legal documents, describes in the complaint how she was taken to the after-party after attempting to gain entry to the VMAs without a ticket. According to the allegations, she was given a drink that made her feel disoriented, leading to the assault by Combs and Carter. Adding to the severity of the allegations, the complaint accuses Jay-Z of orchestrating a campaign of harassment, intimidation, and threats against the plaintiff to prevent her from naming him in the lawsuit. This campaign supposedly extended to Buzbee, his family, employees, clients, and former clients, in an attempt to discredit the attorney and undermine the case. Jay-Z responded to these accusations with a vehement denial on X, branding the lawsuit as a blackmail attempt. His response was not only a defense of his own character but also included personal attacks on Buzbee, challenging the validity of his military service and suggesting that the allegations were part of a larger conspiracy for financial gain. Jay-Z's statement was laden with threats of aggressive defense, referencing his upbringing in Brooklyn's "projects" as a testament to his tenacity. He dared the accusers to file criminal charges, rather than a civil lawsuit, if they believed in their claims. In response, Buzbee issued a statement defending his military career and denouncing Jay-Z's tactics as bullying. He interpreted Jay-Z's response as a direct threat but affirmed his commitment to represent his client, stating he would not be intimidated and was prepared to see the case through to the end. The legal landscape got even more intriguing when another media outlet sought comments from the Southern District of New York State Attorney's Office regarding the potential for criminal charges against Jay-Z. The office, which is currently prosecuting Diddy on federal charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, declined to comment, which has been interpreted by some as potentially significant. This case has sparked intense debate about celebrity accountability, the protection of minors, and the ethics of intimidation in legal battles. With Diddy already detained pending his criminal trial, the addition of Jay-Z to this civil lawsuit could have profound implications for both defendants' careers, reputations, and legal standing. Note to Readers: This article is based on the information available as of December 8, 2024. Legal cases can evolve, and we will continue to monitor this one for further developments. #DiddyLawsuit #JayZAccused #TonyBuzbee #VMA2000Scandal #JusticeForJaneDoe #CelebrityAccountability #HarassmentClaims #LegalBattle #IntimidationTactics #SexualAssaultAllegations #EntertainmentIndustry #ProtectMinors #HighProfileCase #NewYorkCourt #CivilLawsuit #CriminalAllegations

Project Constitution

638,804 views • 1 year ago

Critical testimony from Sasha Latypova for Dutch attorney Peter Stassen's lawsuit against "the architects of The Great Reset," like Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, et al. Note that while Sasha sticks her neck out for a case like this, she's attacked by anon clowns like Jikkyleaks. Jikkyleaks (mouse piss) claims that Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") "has a reputation for derailing and making non-credible legal cases to which she attaches herself," even though she's been celebrated by both Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson and physician-hero Kirk Moore as "instrumental" and a source of critical information—see attached tweets. Meanwhile, mouse piss (Jikkyleaks 🐭) celebrates guys like Blob Malone. Makes you wonder what the deal is with the anon mouse piss? 🤔 ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In my expert opinion, the Covid-19 injections as deployed are indistinguishable from weapons. They are deployed under international legal frameworks for military medical countermeasures, all of which bypass normal regulatory norms, practices, and laws and remove all manufacturers' liability. "The mechanisms of harm were fully foreseeable and documented in numerous regulatory guidances all over the world. The mechanisms include synthetic RNA and DNA mediated cellular dysregulation, inflammatory immune effects and distributed injury to all organs. "The mass deployment of known harmful countermeasures using deceptive advertisement as pharmaceutical vaccines and drugs meets elements of democide, depraved indifference and criminal negligence leading to mass death and injury. Whether it meets the definition of genocide is legal determination for the court. "Dual-use mechanisms make weaponization of these Injections possible. For example, LNP and mRNA platforms have been recognized as dual-use technologies in biodefense literature. Dual use means that they can be used both for military and civilian purposes. Synthetic RNA can cause major damage without necessarily coding for any specific proteins. "Vaccine platforms also recognized in biodefense literature as a mechanism to deliver this deleterious cargo into human body. As previously mentioned, absence of meaningful enforceable pharmaceutical regulations or manufacturer liability makes it completely open. Makes this platform completely open for weaponization and adulteration by design."
1:56

Critical testimony from Sasha Latypova for Dutch attorney Peter Stassen's lawsuit against "the architects of The Great Reset," like Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, et al. Note that while Sasha sticks her neck out for a case like this, she's attacked by anon clowns like Jikkyleaks. Jikkyleaks (mouse piss) claims that Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") "has a reputation for derailing and making non-credible legal cases to which she attaches herself," even though she's been celebrated by both Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson and physician-hero Kirk Moore as "instrumental" and a source of critical information—see attached tweets. Meanwhile, mouse piss (Jikkyleaks 🐭) celebrates guys like Blob Malone. Makes you wonder what the deal is with the anon mouse piss? 🤔 ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In my expert opinion, the Covid-19 injections as deployed are indistinguishable from weapons. They are deployed under international legal frameworks for military medical countermeasures, all of which bypass normal regulatory norms, practices, and laws and remove all manufacturers' liability. "The mechanisms of harm were fully foreseeable and documented in numerous regulatory guidances all over the world. The mechanisms include synthetic RNA and DNA mediated cellular dysregulation, inflammatory immune effects and distributed injury to all organs. "The mass deployment of known harmful countermeasures using deceptive advertisement as pharmaceutical vaccines and drugs meets elements of democide, depraved indifference and criminal negligence leading to mass death and injury. Whether it meets the definition of genocide is legal determination for the court. "Dual-use mechanisms make weaponization of these Injections possible. For example, LNP and mRNA platforms have been recognized as dual-use technologies in biodefense literature. Dual use means that they can be used both for military and civilian purposes. Synthetic RNA can cause major damage without necessarily coding for any specific proteins. "Vaccine platforms also recognized in biodefense literature as a mechanism to deliver this deleterious cargo into human body. As previously mentioned, absence of meaningful enforceable pharmaceutical regulations or manufacturer liability makes it completely open. Makes this platform completely open for weaponization and adulteration by design."

Sense Receptor

24,375 views • 7 months ago

ESSENTIAL VIEWING FOR THE ENTIRE WORLD! What happened must never happen again. The perpetrators must be held accountable New Australian Film - WITNESS STATEMENT The Greatest Crimes in Australia’s History – The Story is Confronting Witness Statement 1 January 2025, has been released, telling the story of the most serious crimes ever committed in Australian history. The documentary addresses all Australian Police, State and Federal, and calls on them to identify and investigate alleged crimes and pursue prosecution of the offenders, without fear or favour. The film outlines numerous facts supported by indisputable data and evidence, of alleged criminal actions perpetrated on the people of Australia through the approval, promotion, mandating and injection of Covid-19 vaccines. It presents data, information, expert testimony and referenced evidence, in relation to the victims, the alleged crimes, the alleged offenders, the weapons used, possible motives, and the intent and means of the offenders. Numerous facts predominantly from Australian sources support the argument, including from our own Prof Ian Brighthope, Dr Phillip Altman, and Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan. Other foreign experts contribute including the famous English cancer specialist Professor Angus Dalgleish, the UK cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, plus Dr Paul Marik and Dr Peter McCullough from the United States, and many more. You will also hear from many of the brave Australian politicians who tried to expose the truth about the Covid-19 pandemic and vaccines, including Senator Malcolm Roberts and Senator Gerard Rennick, as well as current and former members of parliament, Russell Broadbent, Craig Kelly and George Christensen. The facts presented clearly show that there were many serious departures from reasonable standards of conduct and care and unlawful actions, which caused significant harm to Australian men, women and children. But the film is also a beacon of light for those who have not yet been exposed to truthful media reports about the true risks and harms of the Covid-19 injections. These are not conventional vaccines. They are according to global experts, not vaccines, but gene therapy bioweapons. The truth is already in the public domain, but sourcing the information can be challenging for those who don’t know where to look. This documentary strings the publicly available data together in a way that is easy to access and understand. After watching this documentary, the misleading slogan ‘Safe and Effective’, will ring untrue - loud and clear - as the lies are exposed. The documentary is lengthy at 2.5 hours, but it is presented in 9 parts, so that you can pause after, or during, each section to reflect and consider the information carefully. Once you press play, you will want to watch to the end. The documentary has been mailed to the Federal Attorney General, Mark Dreyfus, and all State and Territory Police Commissioners, with a call to action to watch the documentary and take action to investigate the alleged crimes and prosecute the offenders. A link to the film will also be emailed to our elected representatives at Council, State and Federal level, to ensure that they too can be informed of the facts and take action to protect the people from further harm. The film can be viewed now at : Click here for film trailer. For media inquiries contact Debra Leigh Email: program.justice@proton.me credit to Debra Leigh /GlobalTruthNetwork / CMNnews /
2:34:05

ESSENTIAL VIEWING FOR THE ENTIRE WORLD! What happened must never happen again. The perpetrators must be held accountable New Australian Film - WITNESS STATEMENT The Greatest Crimes in Australia’s History – The Story is Confronting Witness Statement 1 January 2025, has been released, telling the story of the most serious crimes ever committed in Australian history. The documentary addresses all Australian Police, State and Federal, and calls on them to identify and investigate alleged crimes and pursue prosecution of the offenders, without fear or favour. The film outlines numerous facts supported by indisputable data and evidence, of alleged criminal actions perpetrated on the people of Australia through the approval, promotion, mandating and injection of Covid-19 vaccines. It presents data, information, expert testimony and referenced evidence, in relation to the victims, the alleged crimes, the alleged offenders, the weapons used, possible motives, and the intent and means of the offenders. Numerous facts predominantly from Australian sources support the argument, including from our own Prof Ian Brighthope, Dr Phillip Altman, and Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan. Other foreign experts contribute including the famous English cancer specialist Professor Angus Dalgleish, the UK cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, plus Dr Paul Marik and Dr Peter McCullough from the United States, and many more. You will also hear from many of the brave Australian politicians who tried to expose the truth about the Covid-19 pandemic and vaccines, including Senator Malcolm Roberts and Senator Gerard Rennick, as well as current and former members of parliament, Russell Broadbent, Craig Kelly and George Christensen. The facts presented clearly show that there were many serious departures from reasonable standards of conduct and care and unlawful actions, which caused significant harm to Australian men, women and children. But the film is also a beacon of light for those who have not yet been exposed to truthful media reports about the true risks and harms of the Covid-19 injections. These are not conventional vaccines. They are according to global experts, not vaccines, but gene therapy bioweapons. The truth is already in the public domain, but sourcing the information can be challenging for those who don’t know where to look. This documentary strings the publicly available data together in a way that is easy to access and understand. After watching this documentary, the misleading slogan ‘Safe and Effective’, will ring untrue - loud and clear - as the lies are exposed. The documentary is lengthy at 2.5 hours, but it is presented in 9 parts, so that you can pause after, or during, each section to reflect and consider the information carefully. Once you press play, you will want to watch to the end. The documentary has been mailed to the Federal Attorney General, Mark Dreyfus, and all State and Territory Police Commissioners, with a call to action to watch the documentary and take action to investigate the alleged crimes and prosecute the offenders. A link to the film will also be emailed to our elected representatives at Council, State and Federal level, to ensure that they too can be informed of the facts and take action to protect the people from further harm. The film can be viewed now at : Click here for film trailer. For media inquiries contact Debra Leigh Email: [email protected] credit to Debra Leigh /GlobalTruthNetwork / CMNnews /

Max Freedom

16,033 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Pfizer gave $11M to Canadian officials during COVID, who got the money and why? Whistleblower lawsuit alleges foreign corruption violations that call into question Pfizer’s influence on Canada’s pandemic decisions. While Canadians were being urged to “trust the science” and line up for COVID-19 vaccines, a 2023 whistleblower lawsuit in California suggests something very concerning was happening behind the scenes. Frank Han, Pfizer’s former director of global compliance analytics, alleges in a civil lawsuit that the pharmaceutical giant funnelled millions to what the company labelled “Potentially Influential Government Officials,” or PIGOs. According to the suit, this activity violated foreign corruption laws. Han claims he raised red flags about potential fraudulent interactions between Pfizer and officials in China, only to be fired for doing so. Now, his lawsuit has brought attention to an unprecedented level of corporate spending on government contracts during a global health crisis. Between the second quarter of 2019 and the third quarter of 2021 — spanning the pre-pandemic period through the global rollout of mRNA vaccines — Pfizer allegedly spent $168 million targeting officials in China, $12 million in the United States, and $11 million in Canada. Canadian virologist and immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle points out that the scale is extraordinary. Canada’s pharmaceutical market is roughly one-eighteenth the size of the U.S., yet it received nearly as much money as American officials. Why would Pfizer invest so heavily in Canadian contacts when public health agencies here typically follow U.S. guidance anyway? What positions did these officials hold, and what decisions were influenced, from vaccine procurement to lockdown policies to public messaging? As it stands now, under Canada’s conflict of interest rules, public officials must disclose certain financial relationships, but there’s no easily searchable public record showing where Pfizer’s $11 million went. At Rebel News, we’re filing Access to Information requests to uncover this paper trail. Canadians deserve clarity on whether those shaping public health policy had undisclosed financial ties to a company profiting from the crisis. If Pfizer’s payments to Canadian PIGOs were legitimate, disclosure should be straightforward, but if money influenced decisions during one of the most consequential public health crises in modern history, Canadians have a right to know and to demand accountability. The questions are clear, but the answers remain in the hands of those who received the money.
5:10

🚨 Pfizer gave $11M to Canadian officials during COVID, who got the money and why? Whistleblower lawsuit alleges foreign corruption violations that call into question Pfizer’s influence on Canada’s pandemic decisions. While Canadians were being urged to “trust the science” and line up for COVID-19 vaccines, a 2023 whistleblower lawsuit in California suggests something very concerning was happening behind the scenes. Frank Han, Pfizer’s former director of global compliance analytics, alleges in a civil lawsuit that the pharmaceutical giant funnelled millions to what the company labelled “Potentially Influential Government Officials,” or PIGOs. According to the suit, this activity violated foreign corruption laws. Han claims he raised red flags about potential fraudulent interactions between Pfizer and officials in China, only to be fired for doing so. Now, his lawsuit has brought attention to an unprecedented level of corporate spending on government contracts during a global health crisis. Between the second quarter of 2019 and the third quarter of 2021 — spanning the pre-pandemic period through the global rollout of mRNA vaccines — Pfizer allegedly spent $168 million targeting officials in China, $12 million in the United States, and $11 million in Canada. Canadian virologist and immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle points out that the scale is extraordinary. Canada’s pharmaceutical market is roughly one-eighteenth the size of the U.S., yet it received nearly as much money as American officials. Why would Pfizer invest so heavily in Canadian contacts when public health agencies here typically follow U.S. guidance anyway? What positions did these officials hold, and what decisions were influenced, from vaccine procurement to lockdown policies to public messaging? As it stands now, under Canada’s conflict of interest rules, public officials must disclose certain financial relationships, but there’s no easily searchable public record showing where Pfizer’s $11 million went. At Rebel News, we’re filing Access to Information requests to uncover this paper trail. Canadians deserve clarity on whether those shaping public health policy had undisclosed financial ties to a company profiting from the crisis. If Pfizer’s payments to Canadian PIGOs were legitimate, disclosure should be straightforward, but if money influenced decisions during one of the most consequential public health crises in modern history, Canadians have a right to know and to demand accountability. The questions are clear, but the answers remain in the hands of those who received the money.

Rebel News

59,999 views • 5 months ago

BREAKING NEWS: Emergency injunction and tribunal order was served to WHO and all Criminal Defendants listed below to immediately cease and desist a criminal conspiracy to commit war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and to arrest and incarcerate these criminal defendants. All Constitutional law enforcements officers worldwide are being served starting with Interpol and constitutional law enforcements in everyone of the 194 member nations under Writs of Mandamus ordering them to carry out their duties to arrest and incarcerate these criminal codefendants for unlawful and Genocidal acts in connection with the WHO Pandemic preparedness response and changes to the international health regulations. Tribunal Writs of Mandamus is defined as: “The lawful term writ of mandamus refers to an order by a court to a lesser government official to perform an act required by law, which he has refused or neglected to do. This type of court order is a remedy that may be sought if a governmental agency, public authority, or corporation in service of the government, fails or refuses to do its public or statutory duty.” This has been ordered by the Tribunal Under Articles 6 (Genocide) and 7 (Crimes Against Humanity) of the International Criminal Code. List of Criminal Defendants 2009-2023 Lockstep Vaccination Genocidal Pandemic Criminal Co-conspiracy, including and not limited to individually and collectively: Bill and Melinda Gates individually and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. World Health Organization (WHO) and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO Director General, Anthony Stephen Fauci. World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents. Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller Jr, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Rockefeller Foundation, Global Business Network (GBN), Peter Schwartz, Chairman GBN. Convicted Vaccination Genocidal Pandemic and Neural Monitoring Governmental Executive Defendants: Xi JinPing, General Secretary of the Communist Party. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation. Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America. Joseph R. Biden 46th President of the United States of America. Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of the UK. Matt Hancock, UK Secretary of State for Health. The Crown Corporation and any and all of its Subsidiaries including and not limited to Serco. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada. Scott Morrison, Prime Minister of Australia. Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister of New Zealand. Stefan Löfven Prime Minister of Sweden. Minister of Heath Lena Hallengren. Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India. Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron, President of France. Edouard Phillipe, Prime Minister of France. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany. António Guterres, Secretary General of the United Nations Organization. European Union, and President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. President of the Parliament, David Sassoli. President of the European Council, Charles Michel. Michael Ryan, WHO CEO's at GCHQ-UK, NSA-USA and Bilderberg Group, all CEOs, Monarchies, and Members. Convicted Defendant Pandemic Vaccine Programs: Global Alliance Vaccine Initiative [GAVI], The Vaccine Alliance, including and not limited to its Pandemic Vaccine Program. Pandemic Vaccine Program United States of America, Operation Warp Speed and successor Pandemic Vaccine Program. World Health Organization COVAX, Pandemic Vaccine Program. Pandemic Vaccine Program People's Republic of China, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control. Russian Federation, Rospotrebnadzor. Convicted Genocidal Vaccination Entities: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, The Pirbright Institute. 02/24/23 Judge Pascal Najadi: They will all be arrested as soon as possible, Military and law enforcement worldwide are preparing for this to happen. Godspeed.
11:58

BREAKING NEWS: Emergency injunction and tribunal order was served to WHO and all Criminal Defendants listed below to immediately cease and desist a criminal conspiracy to commit war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and to arrest and incarcerate these criminal defendants. All Constitutional law enforcements officers worldwide are being served starting with Interpol and constitutional law enforcements in everyone of the 194 member nations under Writs of Mandamus ordering them to carry out their duties to arrest and incarcerate these criminal codefendants for unlawful and Genocidal acts in connection with the WHO Pandemic preparedness response and changes to the international health regulations. Tribunal Writs of Mandamus is defined as: “The lawful term writ of mandamus refers to an order by a court to a lesser government official to perform an act required by law, which he has refused or neglected to do. This type of court order is a remedy that may be sought if a governmental agency, public authority, or corporation in service of the government, fails or refuses to do its public or statutory duty.” This has been ordered by the Tribunal Under Articles 6 (Genocide) and 7 (Crimes Against Humanity) of the International Criminal Code. List of Criminal Defendants 2009-2023 Lockstep Vaccination Genocidal Pandemic Criminal Co-conspiracy, including and not limited to individually and collectively: Bill and Melinda Gates individually and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. World Health Organization (WHO) and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO Director General, Anthony Stephen Fauci. World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents. Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller Jr, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Rockefeller Foundation, Global Business Network (GBN), Peter Schwartz, Chairman GBN. Convicted Vaccination Genocidal Pandemic and Neural Monitoring Governmental Executive Defendants: Xi JinPing, General Secretary of the Communist Party. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation. Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America. Joseph R. Biden 46th President of the United States of America. Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of the UK. Matt Hancock, UK Secretary of State for Health. The Crown Corporation and any and all of its Subsidiaries including and not limited to Serco. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada. Scott Morrison, Prime Minister of Australia. Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister of New Zealand. Stefan Löfven Prime Minister of Sweden. Minister of Heath Lena Hallengren. Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India. Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron, President of France. Edouard Phillipe, Prime Minister of France. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany. António Guterres, Secretary General of the United Nations Organization. European Union, and President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. President of the Parliament, David Sassoli. President of the European Council, Charles Michel. Michael Ryan, WHO CEO's at GCHQ-UK, NSA-USA and Bilderberg Group, all CEOs, Monarchies, and Members. Convicted Defendant Pandemic Vaccine Programs: Global Alliance Vaccine Initiative [GAVI], The Vaccine Alliance, including and not limited to its Pandemic Vaccine Program. Pandemic Vaccine Program United States of America, Operation Warp Speed and successor Pandemic Vaccine Program. World Health Organization COVAX, Pandemic Vaccine Program. Pandemic Vaccine Program People's Republic of China, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control. Russian Federation, Rospotrebnadzor. Convicted Genocidal Vaccination Entities: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, The Pirbright Institute. 02/24/23 Judge Pascal Najadi: They will all be arrested as soon as possible, Military and law enforcement worldwide are preparing for this to happen. Godspeed.

Truth Justice ™

2,483,297 views • 3 years ago

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.
1:05

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

Music is Life

1,891,673 views • 11 months ago

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Diabolical Truth Behind All Vaccines According to Dr. Yeadon, groundbreaking investigative work by researchers Sasha Latypova (a retired pharma development executive) and Katherine Watt (a legal scholar) has uncovered a horrifying truth. Their findings, which align with his own expertise, suggest vaccines have never been primarily intended to reduce disease or improve health. Instead, they are mechanisms of harm. While the COVID-19 "jabs" are the most dangerous iteration, Dr. Yeadon states that all vaccines are implicated. None are good. The core of this discovery lies in a long-understood immunological principle, for which scientist Charles Richet won a Nobel Prize in 1913: anaphylactic sensitization. If you inject a tiny amount of a foreign protein into a person multiple times, you can induce a severe, lifelong allergy to that substance. Now, apply this to vaccine ingredients. What if childhood jabs contained minuscule, often undeclared amounts of: ▪️ Peanut oil? ▪️ Milk whey protein? ▪️ Beef plasma protein? The result? A population sensitized to basic food items. This, Dr. Yeadon argues, is the engineered cause of the catastrophic rise in food allergies that older generations (who recall a time with few allergies) have witnessed. He posits this is a deliberate, diabolical strategy to render people intolerant to the natural environment. The COVID-19 mRNA technology is simply an extension of this, forcing the body to produce a harmful "non-self" protein (spike), triggering autoimmune disaster. This isn't a new problem; it's the foundational flaw of vaccination since the late 1700s. As a direct result of this evidence, Dr. Michael Yeadon, a scientist with decades of experience at the highest levels of pharmaceutical research, declares himself proudly and unequivocally anti-vaccine of all kinds. His final advice? Don't take his word for it. Read the work of Latypova and Watt yourself and decide.
5:32

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Diabolical Truth Behind All Vaccines According to Dr. Yeadon, groundbreaking investigative work by researchers Sasha Latypova (a retired pharma development executive) and Katherine Watt (a legal scholar) has uncovered a horrifying truth. Their findings, which align with his own expertise, suggest vaccines have never been primarily intended to reduce disease or improve health. Instead, they are mechanisms of harm. While the COVID-19 "jabs" are the most dangerous iteration, Dr. Yeadon states that all vaccines are implicated. None are good. The core of this discovery lies in a long-understood immunological principle, for which scientist Charles Richet won a Nobel Prize in 1913: anaphylactic sensitization. If you inject a tiny amount of a foreign protein into a person multiple times, you can induce a severe, lifelong allergy to that substance. Now, apply this to vaccine ingredients. What if childhood jabs contained minuscule, often undeclared amounts of: ▪️ Peanut oil? ▪️ Milk whey protein? ▪️ Beef plasma protein? The result? A population sensitized to basic food items. This, Dr. Yeadon argues, is the engineered cause of the catastrophic rise in food allergies that older generations (who recall a time with few allergies) have witnessed. He posits this is a deliberate, diabolical strategy to render people intolerant to the natural environment. The COVID-19 mRNA technology is simply an extension of this, forcing the body to produce a harmful "non-self" protein (spike), triggering autoimmune disaster. This isn't a new problem; it's the foundational flaw of vaccination since the late 1700s. As a direct result of this evidence, Dr. Michael Yeadon, a scientist with decades of experience at the highest levels of pharmaceutical research, declares himself proudly and unequivocally anti-vaccine of all kinds. His final advice? Don't take his word for it. Read the work of Latypova and Watt yourself and decide.

Camus

49,019 views • 11 months ago

BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes. Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation paid Google, Facebook, Politico, Wikipedia, Fact Checkers in order to censor and control all the information. The CIA has been using Operation Mockingbird for years and has over 3,000 agents implanted in Mainstream Media to control the population. Event 201 was sponsored by Bill Gates, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (CIA) and the World Economic Forum to enforce a worldwide Pandemic response 5 months before the WHO fraudulently declared a global pandemic. It was a planned coordinated criminal effort worldwide. In January 2017 Anthony Fauci said there will be a surprise virus outbreak before the end of 2020. Bill Gates in 2015 talked of a future pandemic and lied in April 2020 when he said they did not simulate or practice for a pandemic. Klaus Schwab in his book Covid-19 The Great Reset shows Covid was the Trojan Horse to Reset the World according to the UN 2030 Agenda. Build Back Better slogan is a criminal coordinated effort to remove human rights and institute a one world government. Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation bribes the WHO, NIH, NIAID, CDC, FDA, Medical Schools and Journals to control the health industry and public health policy. WHO Chief Tedros involved in genocide killing and torture in Ethiopia. Tedros is a known member of the communist party. He is Beijing's and Bill Gates puppet. As a Health Minister he was accused of covering up three Cholera Epidemics and committing crimes against humanity. The CCP and Bill Gates helped put Tedros in charge of the WHO. John D. Rockefeller over 100 years ago seized the U.S. Media and took control over public health using toxic petroleum based drugs for profit and controlled the American Medical Association blacklisting and expelling any doctors who practiced natural medicine. Rockefeller's poison injections and medicines started causing cancer in early years and to cover it up formed the American Cancer Society. Medical error is the 3rd leading cause of death in America. Bill Gates used India and Africa as guinea pigs for pharmaceutical companies to make a financial killing while killing a lot of people in the process including killing innocent children and babies with vaccines. Bill Gates controls GAVI The Vaccine Alliance to vaccinate the world with his poisons. National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests December 10, 1974 (THE KISSINGER REPORT) shows the intention of governments to reduce the population. Bill Gates is one of the key funders in the Stratosphere experiment to block out the sun for Climate Change by releasing poisons in the air. Environmental Scientist call it global genocide experiment. Gates has invested over one billion dollars in the Earth Now Global Surveillance project to launch hundreds of satellites to monitor people everywhere 24/7 a day. In partnership with MIT Bill Gates has developed a new technology that allows vaccines to be injected under your skin along with your medical records. Bill Gates Gates funded genetically modified mosquitoes released in the USA to allow human immunization by means of mosquito bites "Flying Syringes." Bill Gates had business dealings and a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child sex criminal. Why would he choose to partner with the world's most notorious pedophile? To Blackmail? Bill Gates is the top financial donor of the WHO and CDC. No one person has more power than Gates to influence and control the health and medical freedom of all people. Bill Gates and all mRNA Vaccines must be stopped. This is a global genocide experiment and a takeover of the world.
59:56

BILL GATES CRIMES: U.S. patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in the creation of Wuhan SARS-CoV-2. Gates and CCP controlled WHO appoints criminal Tedros. CDC, FDA, CIA, NIH, Gates, Fauci, Baric, Rockefeller are all involved in Federal Crimes. Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation paid Google, Facebook, Politico, Wikipedia, Fact Checkers in order to censor and control all the information. The CIA has been using Operation Mockingbird for years and has over 3,000 agents implanted in Mainstream Media to control the population. Event 201 was sponsored by Bill Gates, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (CIA) and the World Economic Forum to enforce a worldwide Pandemic response 5 months before the WHO fraudulently declared a global pandemic. It was a planned coordinated criminal effort worldwide. In January 2017 Anthony Fauci said there will be a surprise virus outbreak before the end of 2020. Bill Gates in 2015 talked of a future pandemic and lied in April 2020 when he said they did not simulate or practice for a pandemic. Klaus Schwab in his book Covid-19 The Great Reset shows Covid was the Trojan Horse to Reset the World according to the UN 2030 Agenda. Build Back Better slogan is a criminal coordinated effort to remove human rights and institute a one world government. Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation bribes the WHO, NIH, NIAID, CDC, FDA, Medical Schools and Journals to control the health industry and public health policy. WHO Chief Tedros involved in genocide killing and torture in Ethiopia. Tedros is a known member of the communist party. He is Beijing's and Bill Gates puppet. As a Health Minister he was accused of covering up three Cholera Epidemics and committing crimes against humanity. The CCP and Bill Gates helped put Tedros in charge of the WHO. John D. Rockefeller over 100 years ago seized the U.S. Media and took control over public health using toxic petroleum based drugs for profit and controlled the American Medical Association blacklisting and expelling any doctors who practiced natural medicine. Rockefeller's poison injections and medicines started causing cancer in early years and to cover it up formed the American Cancer Society. Medical error is the 3rd leading cause of death in America. Bill Gates used India and Africa as guinea pigs for pharmaceutical companies to make a financial killing while killing a lot of people in the process including killing innocent children and babies with vaccines. Bill Gates controls GAVI The Vaccine Alliance to vaccinate the world with his poisons. National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests December 10, 1974 (THE KISSINGER REPORT) shows the intention of governments to reduce the population. Bill Gates is one of the key funders in the Stratosphere experiment to block out the sun for Climate Change by releasing poisons in the air. Environmental Scientist call it global genocide experiment. Gates has invested over one billion dollars in the Earth Now Global Surveillance project to launch hundreds of satellites to monitor people everywhere 24/7 a day. In partnership with MIT Bill Gates has developed a new technology that allows vaccines to be injected under your skin along with your medical records. Bill Gates Gates funded genetically modified mosquitoes released in the USA to allow human immunization by means of mosquito bites "Flying Syringes." Bill Gates had business dealings and a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child sex criminal. Why would he choose to partner with the world's most notorious pedophile? To Blackmail? Bill Gates is the top financial donor of the WHO and CDC. No one person has more power than Gates to influence and control the health and medical freedom of all people. Bill Gates and all mRNA Vaccines must be stopped. This is a global genocide experiment and a takeover of the world.

Truth Justice ™

2,498,600 views • 3 years ago

U.N. Took No Action Against Fired UNRWA Terrorists Involved in Oct. 7 Massacre: Q: “I’m wondering, in connection with UNRWA employees, I think there were nine of them fired because of their involvement in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israeli civilians. Has the UN taken any further steps to hold those employees accountable, either criminally or civilly in court?” 🇺🇳 UN Spokesperson: “I believe the situation is that they did, in fact, dismiss those people in which there was credible evidence linking them to Hamas. As you know, the UN stands ready to waive immunity of staff or former staff as needed in the prosecution of criminal investigations by national authorities.” Q: “Well, what I’m talking about in this case is whether the UN itself—because it does have this legal capacity to itself bring the suit—whether the UN has been proactive in seeking legal accountability for what those fired employees did, and if not, why not?” 🇺🇳: “You seem to misunderstand. The UN does not have capacity to have its own criminal trials. Those are conducted by national jurisdictions. We cooperate with those national jurisdictions, including by waiving immunity as needed.” Q: “I think you’re misunderstanding my question. The UN has legal capacity to be a plaintiff, to bring a lawsuit in a court, international court. And I’m wondering whether it has exercised that authority proactively in the name of the United Nations against these fired employees who acted recklessly and outside the scope of their authority, and in some cases, created some damage to the reputation of the UN.” 🇺🇳: “What the UN has done, as I’ve stated, is that it took action in terms of firing the employees and then cooperating with national authorities in terms of investigation into them. Yes, Stefano, and then Abdelhamid…”
2:27

U.N. Took No Action Against Fired UNRWA Terrorists Involved in Oct. 7 Massacre: Q: “I’m wondering, in connection with UNRWA employees, I think there were nine of them fired because of their involvement in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israeli civilians. Has the UN taken any further steps to hold those employees accountable, either criminally or civilly in court?” 🇺🇳 UN Spokesperson: “I believe the situation is that they did, in fact, dismiss those people in which there was credible evidence linking them to Hamas. As you know, the UN stands ready to waive immunity of staff or former staff as needed in the prosecution of criminal investigations by national authorities.” Q: “Well, what I’m talking about in this case is whether the UN itself—because it does have this legal capacity to itself bring the suit—whether the UN has been proactive in seeking legal accountability for what those fired employees did, and if not, why not?” 🇺🇳: “You seem to misunderstand. The UN does not have capacity to have its own criminal trials. Those are conducted by national jurisdictions. We cooperate with those national jurisdictions, including by waiving immunity as needed.” Q: “I think you’re misunderstanding my question. The UN has legal capacity to be a plaintiff, to bring a lawsuit in a court, international court. And I’m wondering whether it has exercised that authority proactively in the name of the United Nations against these fired employees who acted recklessly and outside the scope of their authority, and in some cases, created some damage to the reputation of the UN.” 🇺🇳: “What the UN has done, as I’ve stated, is that it took action in terms of firing the employees and then cooperating with national authorities in terms of investigation into them. Yes, Stefano, and then Abdelhamid…”

UN Watch

19,899 views • 3 months ago

A landmark lawsuit filed by physicians against the CDC exposes a staggering admission: the entire childhood vaccine schedule—72 doses from birth to age 18—has NEVER been studied for its collective long-term effects. The CDC concedes this critical point. While individual vaccines are tested, the synergistic effect of administering them together as mandated remains a vast, uncharted scientific territory. The lawsuit reveals these individual trials often only track short-term outcomes. The plaintiffs' demand is clear: the CDC must either conduct a comprehensive study of the full schedule or reclassify vaccines. Currently, most childhood vaccines hold a Category A status, making them a requirement. The physicians argue they should be moved to Category B, which allows for personalized medical decisions between parents and doctors, acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all mandate is not evidence-based. The CDC's justification for this lack of safety data? They claim it would be difficult to find an unvaccinated control group and that such a long-term study would be too expensive. Critics find these excuses hollow, pointing to a large population of unvaccinated children and questioning the allocation of the agency's billion-dollar budget. This case forces a fundamental question: Why is the foundational public health policy for our children built on an unproven assumption? The outcome of this lawsuit could redefine informed consent and medical choice for a generation. Follow for updates as this critical legal battle unfolds.
2:54

A landmark lawsuit filed by physicians against the CDC exposes a staggering admission: the entire childhood vaccine schedule—72 doses from birth to age 18—has NEVER been studied for its collective long-term effects. The CDC concedes this critical point. While individual vaccines are tested, the synergistic effect of administering them together as mandated remains a vast, uncharted scientific territory. The lawsuit reveals these individual trials often only track short-term outcomes. The plaintiffs' demand is clear: the CDC must either conduct a comprehensive study of the full schedule or reclassify vaccines. Currently, most childhood vaccines hold a Category A status, making them a requirement. The physicians argue they should be moved to Category B, which allows for personalized medical decisions between parents and doctors, acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all mandate is not evidence-based. The CDC's justification for this lack of safety data? They claim it would be difficult to find an unvaccinated control group and that such a long-term study would be too expensive. Critics find these excuses hollow, pointing to a large population of unvaccinated children and questioning the allocation of the agency's billion-dollar budget. This case forces a fundamental question: Why is the foundational public health policy for our children built on an unproven assumption? The outcome of this lawsuit could redefine informed consent and medical choice for a generation. Follow for updates as this critical legal battle unfolds.

Camus

732,066 views • 10 months ago

BREAKING - In an exclusive webinar presentation and slide show for the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms), Dr. Regina Watteel breaks down and clearly lays out the irrefutable damning evidence that she uncovered and exposes in her recently published preprint paper, which systematically dismantles every major piece of evidence used to justify Canada’s 2021–22 COVID vaccine mandates and travel restrictions. Dr. Watteel's paper is currently under international peer review. Jay Bhattacharya, we need to get as many eyes on this around the globe as soon as possible, so please share this presentation with, Secretary Kennedy, Dr Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Mehmet Oz, Robert W Malone, MD, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®, and all of your colleagues - Thank you. Download the full preprint paper here: For more startling evidence, read Dr. Watteel's best selling book, Fisman's Fraud - The Rise of Canadian Hate Science: Dr. Watteel's research is 100% independent & unfunded, so if you feel so inclined, please help support her work: Full webinar video can be found here on the JCCF's website: Natali Morris Trish Wood Noé Chartier Neil Oliver Conrad Black Dr Jordan B Peterson Tammy Peterson Joe Rogan Tucker Carlson CaitlinSinclairTV
45:16

BREAKING - In an exclusive webinar presentation and slide show for the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms), Dr. Regina Watteel breaks down and clearly lays out the irrefutable damning evidence that she uncovered and exposes in her recently published preprint paper, which systematically dismantles every major piece of evidence used to justify Canada’s 2021–22 COVID vaccine mandates and travel restrictions. Dr. Watteel's paper is currently under international peer review. Jay Bhattacharya, we need to get as many eyes on this around the globe as soon as possible, so please share this presentation with, Secretary Kennedy, Dr Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Mehmet Oz, Robert W Malone, MD, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®, and all of your colleagues - Thank you. Download the full preprint paper here: For more startling evidence, read Dr. Watteel's best selling book, Fisman's Fraud - The Rise of Canadian Hate Science: Dr. Watteel's research is 100% independent & unfunded, so if you feel so inclined, please help support her work: Full webinar video can be found here on the JCCF's website: Natali Morris Trish Wood Noé Chartier Neil Oliver Conrad Black Dr Jordan B Peterson Tammy Peterson Joe Rogan Tucker Carlson CaitlinSinclairTV

Shaun Rickard

28,557 views • 8 months ago

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.
0:36

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.

Mario Nawfal

3,646,145 views • 3 years ago