Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🔥🚨BREAKING: TPUSA’s Andrew Kolvet just revealed that he shared information with Joe Kent to help pursue every possible lead in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. He went on to confirm that he doesn’t have any proof that Kent sent Candace Owens leaks and he isn’t making this video to tarnish Kent’s...

dom_lucre's profile picture

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

1,694,826 subscribers

150,012 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Here are the facts: Yes, I shared the screen grab with Joe Kent because I was told I could trust him and I wanted EVERY possible lead pursued. We've done this quietly behind the scenes with countless items. Yes he did suggest I make it public. I declined. A few weeks later the screen grab was leaked anyway. I'm not going to recklessly tarnish somebody's reputation if I don't have irrefutable proof, but now that my name's being brought up, it's time to address it.
4:05

Here are the facts: Yes, I shared the screen grab with Joe Kent because I was told I could trust him and I wanted EVERY possible lead pursued. We've done this quietly behind the scenes with countless items. Yes he did suggest I make it public. I declined. A few weeks later the screen grab was leaked anyway. I'm not going to recklessly tarnish somebody's reputation if I don't have irrefutable proof, but now that my name's being brought up, it's time to address it.

Andrew Kolvet

1,849,623 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

It’s hard to fathom how deeply the Turning Point USA staff has been betrayed these past six months. On the show today, Andrew Kolvet explains how he thought he could trust Joe Kent, shared Charlie’s group chat with him, & then the chat was leaked to millions by Candace: “I was told I could trust Joe Kent. I provided the screen grabs to Joe Kent… Joe did message me and suggest that I make those screen grabs public. I declined because those were shared privately. I didn’t want to be reckless with them in the public… But then fast-forward another week or two, and they were made public.” So the leaker was either Kent or his staff, and based on his smiling selfies with Candace, the answer seems clear. At this point, I think it’s very likely that he’s guilty of other leaks, as well.
1:38

It’s hard to fathom how deeply the Turning Point USA staff has been betrayed these past six months. On the show today, Andrew Kolvet explains how he thought he could trust Joe Kent, shared Charlie’s group chat with him, & then the chat was leaked to millions by Candace: “I was told I could trust Joe Kent. I provided the screen grabs to Joe Kent… Joe did message me and suggest that I make those screen grabs public. I declined because those were shared privately. I didn’t want to be reckless with them in the public… But then fast-forward another week or two, and they were made public.” So the leaker was either Kent or his staff, and based on his smiling selfies with Candace, the answer seems clear. At this point, I think it’s very likely that he’s guilty of other leaks, as well.

Jackie Chea ⚖️| Agent #13/92

255,022 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Somebody is lying… who? Mark Levin: TPUSA Andrew Kolvet said he gave you Charlie Kirk’s last text messages about Israeli donors… you called him and told him to make it public. He didn’t want to, so you leaked it to Candace Owens. True or false? Joe Kent: That is absolutely False. I did not give anything to Candace Owens Andrew Kolvet: I don’t get enough credit.. the fact that I’ve shared these group chats in the first place — Charlie never mentioned once he was worried about “The Jews” coming after him Joe Kent Clip Andrew Kolvet
1:13

Somebody is lying… who? Mark Levin: TPUSA Andrew Kolvet said he gave you Charlie Kirk’s last text messages about Israeli donors… you called him and told him to make it public. He didn’t want to, so you leaked it to Candace Owens. True or false? Joe Kent: That is absolutely False. I did not give anything to Candace Owens Andrew Kolvet: I don’t get enough credit.. the fact that I’ve shared these group chats in the first place — Charlie never mentioned once he was worried about “The Jews” coming after him Joe Kent Clip Andrew Kolvet

MJTruthUltra

66,520 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: Joe Kent has again pointed to information leaked to Candace Owens while he was still involved in Charlie Kirk’s investigation at the Counter Terror Centre as potential proof of a broader conspiracy. Today, in an interview with the Daily Caller, Kent said there were “more leads to run down” in the Kirk investigation, adding, “we knew that there were people who had prior knowledge” of the assassination - pointing specifically to George Zinn. On Oct 8, 2025, Candace Owens said on her show that a source told her George Zinn claimed he had been paid to stage a scene and take responsibility for Kirk’s death. She added that Zinn did not know who was behind it, and that payment would come afterward. Owens cited this as evidence of an “op.” This follows last week, when Kent cited leaked group chat screenshots as potential evidence of a larger conspiracy. Those screenshots, which were provided to Owens, were later revealed to have been given to Kent by Andrew Kolvet. Kent continues to maintain that he has not leaked anything to Candace Owens.
1:06

🚨BREAKING: Joe Kent has again pointed to information leaked to Candace Owens while he was still involved in Charlie Kirk’s investigation at the Counter Terror Centre as potential proof of a broader conspiracy. Today, in an interview with the Daily Caller, Kent said there were “more leads to run down” in the Kirk investigation, adding, “we knew that there were people who had prior knowledge” of the assassination - pointing specifically to George Zinn. On Oct 8, 2025, Candace Owens said on her show that a source told her George Zinn claimed he had been paid to stage a scene and take responsibility for Kirk’s death. She added that Zinn did not know who was behind it, and that payment would come afterward. Owens cited this as evidence of an “op.” This follows last week, when Kent cited leaked group chat screenshots as potential evidence of a larger conspiracy. Those screenshots, which were provided to Owens, were later revealed to have been given to Kent by Andrew Kolvet. Kent continues to maintain that he has not leaked anything to Candace Owens.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

34,571 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Josh Hammer says he feels betrayed by TPUSA Andrew Kolvet and made him apologize because he shared the private Charlie Kirk text messages of him saying he wanted to “abandon the pro-Israel cause” the day before he was assassinated with Joe Kent — “He should have known better” “Joe Kent wanted Andrew Kolvet to leak it himself, this is insane behavior, like pathologically insane batcrap crazy behavior.” So… if it were not for Andrew Kolvet (confirmed) and Joe Kent (unconfirmed), we never would have seen these messages the day before he died. They would have remained classified.
2:53

Josh Hammer says he feels betrayed by TPUSA Andrew Kolvet and made him apologize because he shared the private Charlie Kirk text messages of him saying he wanted to “abandon the pro-Israel cause” the day before he was assassinated with Joe Kent — “He should have known better” “Joe Kent wanted Andrew Kolvet to leak it himself, this is insane behavior, like pathologically insane batcrap crazy behavior.” So… if it were not for Andrew Kolvet (confirmed) and Joe Kent (unconfirmed), we never would have seen these messages the day before he died. They would have remained classified.

MJTruthUltra

144,504 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

BREAKING:🚨 John Solomon reports that the FBI allegedly launched an investigation into Joe Kent in “late 2025”. The timing of that investigation is interesting. Here’s why. On Oct 29th, 2025 it was reported that the FBI shut down Joe Kent’s probe into possible foreign ties to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Joe Kent confirmed that report in a recent interview with Tucker. Kent said he was running down multiple leads suggesting a possible foreign nexus into Kirk’s assassination but was STOPPED by the FBI. The FBI’s investigation into Joe Kent, appearing to have been launched around the same time Kent claims he was told by the FBI to stop investigating the foreign ties, leaves more questions than answers. Watch below . 👇
2:04

BREAKING:🚨 John Solomon reports that the FBI allegedly launched an investigation into Joe Kent in “late 2025”. The timing of that investigation is interesting. Here’s why. On Oct 29th, 2025 it was reported that the FBI shut down Joe Kent’s probe into possible foreign ties to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Joe Kent confirmed that report in a recent interview with Tucker. Kent said he was running down multiple leads suggesting a possible foreign nexus into Kirk’s assassination but was STOPPED by the FBI. The FBI’s investigation into Joe Kent, appearing to have been launched around the same time Kent claims he was told by the FBI to stop investigating the foreign ties, leaves more questions than answers. Watch below . 👇

Heather Mullins

23,358 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.
18:38

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.

Jacktron

34,932 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

THREAD: Here’s a compilation of clips from the interview between Mark R. Levin Mark Levin and Joe Kent Joe Kent. Joe Kent told Mark Levin that he had leads pointing to a foreign nexus behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but he wouldn’t name any countries that are supposedly involved. When pressed on this, Kent caved and said he can’t talk about it because it’s “classified”. He can’t talk about it because he made it up.
1:55

THREAD: Here’s a compilation of clips from the interview between Mark R. Levin Mark Levin and Joe Kent Joe Kent. Joe Kent told Mark Levin that he had leads pointing to a foreign nexus behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but he wouldn’t name any countries that are supposedly involved. When pressed on this, Kent caved and said he can’t talk about it because it’s “classified”. He can’t talk about it because he made it up.

Laura Loomer

222,777 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

HOLY SH*T 🤯 Mitch Snow just MESSED UP big time. He accidentally revealed that Joe Kent has been in communication with him and Candace Owens behind the scenes. Joe Kent is the guy who “vetted” Mitch Snow and gave him and Candace the go ahead to put out the FAKE Fort Huachuca story. Candace has claimed to have “inside sources” that leak her information. At this point I think it’s safe to assume that Joe Kent might be that source. If what Mitch says is true then all parties involved might be in some big trouble.
2:59

HOLY SH*T 🤯 Mitch Snow just MESSED UP big time. He accidentally revealed that Joe Kent has been in communication with him and Candace Owens behind the scenes. Joe Kent is the guy who “vetted” Mitch Snow and gave him and Candace the go ahead to put out the FAKE Fort Huachuca story. Candace has claimed to have “inside sources” that leak her information. At this point I think it’s safe to assume that Joe Kent might be that source. If what Mitch says is true then all parties involved might be in some big trouble.

Cinema Shogun

636,626 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red on Joe Kent's resignation claiming Iran did not pose an imminent threat to the U.S.... "But there's one point that I think is important in that Marco Rubio was part of all of the intelligence briefings on this, and Joe Kent was not. So, Marco Rubio had access to everything that Joe Kent did not have access to. What was also left out of that letter was Joe Kent's plans now -- I suppose to be part of this resistance -- go on podcasts that have been very critical of Israel. This is someone who, over the course of the next few days, you'll see more reporting on how he was seen as a chief leaker in this White House. And that goes to some of the problems I have with -- with some folks who are now amplifying Joe Kent as if they agree with him or as if they suddenly believe that he is someone to be trusted"
0:48

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red on Joe Kent's resignation claiming Iran did not pose an imminent threat to the U.S.... "But there's one point that I think is important in that Marco Rubio was part of all of the intelligence briefings on this, and Joe Kent was not. So, Marco Rubio had access to everything that Joe Kent did not have access to. What was also left out of that letter was Joe Kent's plans now -- I suppose to be part of this resistance -- go on podcasts that have been very critical of Israel. This is someone who, over the course of the next few days, you'll see more reporting on how he was seen as a chief leaker in this White House. And that goes to some of the problems I have with -- with some folks who are now amplifying Joe Kent as if they agree with him or as if they suddenly believe that he is someone to be trusted"

Curtis Houck

67,563 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Confirmation that the episode with Valhalla didn’t happen. I was unaware that Joe Kent was going to join 👀 He had an emergency did he? Is it because he didn’t want to be apart of your click bait psyop?
0:33

Confirmation that the episode with Valhalla didn’t happen. I was unaware that Joe Kent was going to join 👀 He had an emergency did he? Is it because he didn’t want to be apart of your click bait psyop?

Honest Ash

12,471 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Rantz: And that goes to some of the problems I have with with some folks who are now amplifying Joe Kent as if they agree with him… Blow: Donald Trump amplified Joe Kent because he put him in charge of the national counterterrorism center
1:04

Rantz: And that goes to some of the problems I have with with some folks who are now amplifying Joe Kent as if they agree with him… Blow: Donald Trump amplified Joe Kent because he put him in charge of the national counterterrorism center

Acyn

45,493 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Me and Joe Rogan have a history I WENT ON STAGE WITH HIM IN 2019 ( he was talking alot of shit) I PROMISED TO GET HIM BACK AND I DID IN 2023 , WHEN I DID A PODCAST WITH HIS DAD That pissed Joe off , so he decide to put Andrew Wilson on his podcast BECAUSE WE HATE EACHOTHER #FACTS and what did Andrew do with that clout , did a debate with Candace Owens and got smoked HAHAHAHA 🤡
1:09

Me and Joe Rogan have a history I WENT ON STAGE WITH HIM IN 2019 ( he was talking alot of shit) I PROMISED TO GET HIM BACK AND I DID IN 2023 , WHEN I DID A PODCAST WITH HIS DAD That pissed Joe off , so he decide to put Andrew Wilson on his podcast BECAUSE WE HATE EACHOTHER #FACTS and what did Andrew do with that clout , did a debate with Candace Owens and got smoked HAHAHAHA 🤡

Max Prime

25,820 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Arteta on Lewis-Skelly: “I've been tough on him. He had a spectacular season last year when he jumped into the first team. He had some difficult moments after that, but he stayed very humble, very focused, aligned when we wanted to do and I knew he was ready. “He's been showing in training every day the opportunities that he had to play, he's done it and today he really stepped up and I thought he had an incredible performance. Reporter: What was the sort of thinking behind that and why do you think it's taken this long to play him there? Arteta: “Because probably I don't have a clue. Maybe I should have done it earlier, I don't know. But I have to do things when I believe that the player is ready, the team is ready and the opponent is the right one to play with him in that position. “We've done it today, it's the first time, it was a big risk because I knew what was going to happen. If it works, it's great. would have lost the game, what would have happened, how do you play a kid at this age in this scenario in a position he hasn't played all season. I knew that but I had the feeling it was the right game for him.”
1:09

Arteta on Lewis-Skelly: “I've been tough on him. He had a spectacular season last year when he jumped into the first team. He had some difficult moments after that, but he stayed very humble, very focused, aligned when we wanted to do and I knew he was ready. “He's been showing in training every day the opportunities that he had to play, he's done it and today he really stepped up and I thought he had an incredible performance. Reporter: What was the sort of thinking behind that and why do you think it's taken this long to play him there? Arteta: “Because probably I don't have a clue. Maybe I should have done it earlier, I don't know. But I have to do things when I believe that the player is ready, the team is ready and the opponent is the right one to play with him in that position. “We've done it today, it's the first time, it was a big risk because I knew what was going to happen. If it works, it's great. would have lost the game, what would have happened, how do you play a kid at this age in this scenario in a position he hasn't played all season. I knew that but I had the feeling it was the right game for him.”

Connor Humm

384,431 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Joe Kent, who is allegedly under criminal investigation for leaking classified information, floats Candace Owens-level conspiracy theories about the assassination of Charlie Kirk Kent implies it may have something to do with pro-Israel donors and that there could have been a foreign plot to kill Charlie because he did not want war with Iran Everything that he says here will be used by Tyler Robinson's defense team to help their client in court
4:34

Joe Kent, who is allegedly under criminal investigation for leaking classified information, floats Candace Owens-level conspiracy theories about the assassination of Charlie Kirk Kent implies it may have something to do with pro-Israel donors and that there could have been a foreign plot to kill Charlie because he did not want war with Iran Everything that he says here will be used by Tyler Robinson's defense team to help their client in court

Ryan Saavedra

126,593 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Michael Shellenberger interviewed Joe Kent and is reporting that he's willing to testify in the defense of Tyler Robinson. Here's my interview with Michael Shellenberger, posted in FULL. But let me add this... If Israel, Egyptian planes, or any foreign government killed Charlie, I want to know. I was not afraid of that being the truth (which is why I shared the group chat in the first place). But here we are, over six months having passed, and there have been ZERO actionable facts to back any of these theories up. There has been ZERO evidence presented of a broader conspiracy. If Joe Kent has proof, he needs to present it, otherwise all he's doing is sowing chaos and aiding and abetting a murderer.
18:06

Michael Shellenberger interviewed Joe Kent and is reporting that he's willing to testify in the defense of Tyler Robinson. Here's my interview with Michael Shellenberger, posted in FULL. But let me add this... If Israel, Egyptian planes, or any foreign government killed Charlie, I want to know. I was not afraid of that being the truth (which is why I shared the group chat in the first place). But here we are, over six months having passed, and there have been ZERO actionable facts to back any of these theories up. There has been ZERO evidence presented of a broader conspiracy. If Joe Kent has proof, he needs to present it, otherwise all he's doing is sowing chaos and aiding and abetting a murderer.

Andrew Kolvet

294,356 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 CANDACE OWENS: CHARLIE KIRK CAME TO ME IN A DREAM AND TOLD ME HE WAS BETRAYED Owens says Charlie Kirk appeared to her in a dream over the weekend, telling her he was “betrayed”: “You don't have to believe that, but I believe that... I believe it will be inevitably revealed.” Source: Candace Owens Clip: The Calvin Coolidge Project
0:35

🚨🇺🇸 CANDACE OWENS: CHARLIE KIRK CAME TO ME IN A DREAM AND TOLD ME HE WAS BETRAYED Owens says Charlie Kirk appeared to her in a dream over the weekend, telling her he was “betrayed”: “You don't have to believe that, but I believe that... I believe it will be inevitably revealed.” Source: Candace Owens Clip: The Calvin Coolidge Project

Mario Nawfal

1,844,310 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

On the 13th of Sept, someone transferred 180k for an iPhone Xs 256GB. After acknowledging his receipt, he called, and I told him we don't have it but will ask colleagues and let him know. I asked my friend, and he told me 190k. I begged him to leave it at 180k because that is what the guy deposited (check frame 2 for reference). When he sent the phone from Kano to Jos, then I noticed it was an Xs Max. Seeing that the guy was in a hurry and didn't want to disappoint, I called him and told him what happened and said if he wants the Max, he can take it at no additional cost. I was willing to settle the difference because it was his first time buying from us. I packaged it with a new premium charger because all our used phones are sent packaged in our branded box with a charger, and I sent it to him in Abuja. He later messaged that he has received the phone and truly appreciates it. After months of not receiving any complaints from him, it clearly indicates that he has received a fully functioning phone. It is in our policy that if you find anything faulty within one week, you can return it to us and either ask for a replacement or refund. What this means is that the cost of bringing it from Kano to Jos, the packaging and charger, and the delivery to Abuja are all a loss to me. But I didn't mind because at least I have satisfied him. Nine weeks later, while I was in Kano, I saw a call from an unknown number. When I picked up, he said it was him. He told me that the camera has started giving him problems. I told him it has been months since you bought it, but you can take it to any repair store and tell me how much you spent, and I will pay. He asked if I know anyone, and I sent him someone's number. The guy didn't pick; he texted and informed me and later called me. I told him to go to anyone he trusts and let me know the amount he spent. A few days later, I was stranded between Kaduna and Abuja on my trip from Kano to Abuja because my car engine failed. He called, and I didn't pick; I don't even know his number. Later in the night, I received his messages on WhatsApp with a threat that he will make a video to tarnish the image of my business. Someone I was willing to help after months of buying a USED device from me is threatening me. I said he should go ahead because I can't entertain him anymore. In conclusion, a trade that I incurred a loss from is what some people are trying to justify as a scam. The beautiful part is I have made trades with hundreds of people here, and I would love two more people to come out and present a case in which they are still using a device I sold to them that is faulty and they contacted me for a replacement or refund, and I didn't do it instantly. "The hypocrite will always look for faults" - Ghazali. Those that are looking for a fault in me can justify something as woke as this; it doesn't matter. This is my own side and will no longer entertain him anymore. For those that believe in me without hearing from me, thank you so much.
0:20

On the 13th of Sept, someone transferred 180k for an iPhone Xs 256GB. After acknowledging his receipt, he called, and I told him we don't have it but will ask colleagues and let him know. I asked my friend, and he told me 190k. I begged him to leave it at 180k because that is what the guy deposited (check frame 2 for reference). When he sent the phone from Kano to Jos, then I noticed it was an Xs Max. Seeing that the guy was in a hurry and didn't want to disappoint, I called him and told him what happened and said if he wants the Max, he can take it at no additional cost. I was willing to settle the difference because it was his first time buying from us. I packaged it with a new premium charger because all our used phones are sent packaged in our branded box with a charger, and I sent it to him in Abuja. He later messaged that he has received the phone and truly appreciates it. After months of not receiving any complaints from him, it clearly indicates that he has received a fully functioning phone. It is in our policy that if you find anything faulty within one week, you can return it to us and either ask for a replacement or refund. What this means is that the cost of bringing it from Kano to Jos, the packaging and charger, and the delivery to Abuja are all a loss to me. But I didn't mind because at least I have satisfied him. Nine weeks later, while I was in Kano, I saw a call from an unknown number. When I picked up, he said it was him. He told me that the camera has started giving him problems. I told him it has been months since you bought it, but you can take it to any repair store and tell me how much you spent, and I will pay. He asked if I know anyone, and I sent him someone's number. The guy didn't pick; he texted and informed me and later called me. I told him to go to anyone he trusts and let me know the amount he spent. A few days later, I was stranded between Kaduna and Abuja on my trip from Kano to Abuja because my car engine failed. He called, and I didn't pick; I don't even know his number. Later in the night, I received his messages on WhatsApp with a threat that he will make a video to tarnish the image of my business. Someone I was willing to help after months of buying a USED device from me is threatening me. I said he should go ahead because I can't entertain him anymore. In conclusion, a trade that I incurred a loss from is what some people are trying to justify as a scam. The beautiful part is I have made trades with hundreds of people here, and I would love two more people to come out and present a case in which they are still using a device I sold to them that is faulty and they contacted me for a replacement or refund, and I didn't do it instantly. "The hypocrite will always look for faults" - Ghazali. Those that are looking for a fault in me can justify something as woke as this; it doesn't matter. This is my own side and will no longer entertain him anymore. For those that believe in me without hearing from me, thank you so much.

Rayyan Tilde

855,545 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Wow. Joe Kent just revealed the last thing Charlie Kirk said to him: “The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this Earth was in June, in the West Wing.” “He looked me in the eye and he said … Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” “One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis.” “And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?” “The investigation that I was a part of [with] the National Counterterrorism Center, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.” “But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can’t really get into.” “There’s unanswered questions.” “We know, because of the text messages that have been made public, that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.” Joe Kent Tucker Carlson
2:09

Wow. Joe Kent just revealed the last thing Charlie Kirk said to him: “The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this Earth was in June, in the West Wing.” “He looked me in the eye and he said … Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” “One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis.” “And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?” “The investigation that I was a part of [with] the National Counterterrorism Center, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.” “But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can’t really get into.” “There’s unanswered questions.” “We know, because of the text messages that have been made public, that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.” Joe Kent Tucker Carlson

Holden Culotta

4,667,246 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад