Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. SCOTT BESSENT will be sitting in the FRONT ROW at the Supreme Court as they consider abolishing President Trump's sweeping tariffs "I am there to emphasize that this is an economic EMERGENCY. National security is economic security. Economic security is national security. As the Treasury... secretary of the United States, I'm in charge of maintaining both." This is a LANDMARK case and central to Trump's foreign policy wins. "I'm actually going to go and sit hopefully in the front row and have a ringside seat!" "This is a matter of national security. If President Trump had not had the IEEPA, which is an emergency tariff authority, back in the spring, he put IEEPA tariffs on China. Last week in Korea, the Chinese agreed to start working to bring down the precursors for fentanyl. If fentanyl is not a national emergency, what is?!" 🔥🔥🔥 SCOTUS MUST do the right thing!show more

Eric Daugherty

1,129,335 subscribers

146,712 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent ANNOUNCES he’s going to “SIT IN THE FRONT ROW” during THIS WEEK’S Supreme Court Tariff hearings 🚨 “I’m actually going to sit — hopefully in the front row — and have a ringside seat.” 🔥🔥 “They can say what they want. I’m there to emphasize this is an economic emergency.” 🔥

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent ANNOUNCES he’s going to “SIT IN THE FRONT ROW” during THIS WEEK’S Supreme Court Tariff hearings 🚨 “I’m actually going to sit — hopefully in the front row — and have a ringside seat.” 🔥🔥 “They can say what they want. I’m there to emphasize this is an economic emergency.” 🔥

Jesse Watters

1,101,768 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Economic security is national security, and tariffs are safeguarding both. President Trump used emergency authority to stop China’s rare earth threats and cut the flow of fentanyl precursors. With tariffs, he is protecting America’s economy and our people.

Economic security is national security, and tariffs are safeguarding both. President Trump used emergency authority to stop China’s rare earth threats and cut the flow of fentanyl precursors. With tariffs, he is protecting America’s economy and our people.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

153,514 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“This is really a national security issue,” says Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on tariffs. “If the Supreme Court goes the other way, it will be a loss for the American people… look at the drop in fentanyl deaths because President Donald J. Trump was able to put fentanyl tariffs on China, Mexico, Canada.”

“This is really a national security issue,” says Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on tariffs. “If the Supreme Court goes the other way, it will be a loss for the American people… look at the drop in fentanyl deaths because President Donald J. Trump was able to put fentanyl tariffs on China, Mexico, Canada.”

Rapid Response 47

135,684 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent says he listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court will UPHOLD President Trump's sweeping tariffs AWESOME! We're on the verge of a huge WIN! 🇺🇸 "It is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule a president's signature economic policy. They did not overrule Obamacare." "I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos. We have set these trade deals. And it is very good for the United States." "We are balancing our trade deficit. You look, Europe is being overrun with Chinese goods. There is now an emergency in Europe." "There's going to be an economic emergency. The Europeans will follow us. So President Trump is preempting this." "If we go back to emergencies, he put a fentanyl tariff in Mexico, Canada, China. Guess what's happened to fentanyl deaths? If that's an emergency, I don't know what it was!" "October 8th, when the Chinese threatened to put rare earth export controls in the entire world, President Trump threatened a 100% tariff. And the Chinese came to the table, and we negotiated on behalf of the whole world!" 💯💯💯

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent says he listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court will UPHOLD President Trump's sweeping tariffs AWESOME! We're on the verge of a huge WIN! 🇺🇸 "It is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule a president's signature economic policy. They did not overrule Obamacare." "I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos. We have set these trade deals. And it is very good for the United States." "We are balancing our trade deficit. You look, Europe is being overrun with Chinese goods. There is now an emergency in Europe." "There's going to be an economic emergency. The Europeans will follow us. So President Trump is preempting this." "If we go back to emergencies, he put a fentanyl tariff in Mexico, Canada, China. Guess what's happened to fentanyl deaths? If that's an emergency, I don't know what it was!" "October 8th, when the Chinese threatened to put rare earth export controls in the entire world, President Trump threatened a 100% tariff. And the Chinese came to the table, and we negotiated on behalf of the whole world!" 💯💯💯

Eric Daugherty

29,758 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Pres. Trump announces a "historic" trade deal with the United Kingdom following the implementation of Trump's tariffs: "Both countries have agreed that the economic security is national security and we'll be working together as allies."

Pres. Trump announces a "historic" trade deal with the United Kingdom following the implementation of Trump's tariffs: "Both countries have agreed that the economic security is national security and we'll be working together as allies."

ABC News

38,776 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Scott Bessent is AWESOME! Q: Did you expect as Treasury Secretary to be so involved in US national security? SCOTT BESSENT: "This was the problem with past administrations. We separated economic security from national security. I came into office saying — economic security is national security!" "A group of us are running as HARD as we can over the next few years to take away ANY leverage our adversaries might have against us." He's crushing it and will go down in history as one of the greatest EVER! I don't think many people expected the Treasury Secretary to be so pivotal in Trump 2.0. WE LOVE BESSENT 🇺🇸

🚨 Scott Bessent is AWESOME! Q: Did you expect as Treasury Secretary to be so involved in US national security? SCOTT BESSENT: "This was the problem with past administrations. We separated economic security from national security. I came into office saying — economic security is national security!" "A group of us are running as HARD as we can over the next few years to take away ANY leverage our adversaries might have against us." He's crushing it and will go down in history as one of the greatest EVER! I don't think many people expected the Treasury Secretary to be so pivotal in Trump 2.0. WE LOVE BESSENT 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

447,553 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

The President should not invite Chinese automakers to set up shop in the United States. This is quite literally an attempt by Chinese companies to get their foot in the door of the American market. This is a national security and an economic security issue. We should not give an inch.

The President should not invite Chinese automakers to set up shop in the United States. This is quite literally an attempt by Chinese companies to get their foot in the door of the American market. This is a national security and an economic security issue. We should not give an inch.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

13,418 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Tariffs are "a matter of national security and this is one of President Donald J. Trump' signature policies — and it would be very unusual for the Supreme Court to overrule a President's signature policy. The Supreme Court gave President Obama a lot of room on Obamacare..."

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Tariffs are "a matter of national security and this is one of President Donald J. Trump' signature policies — and it would be very unusual for the Supreme Court to overrule a President's signature policy. The Supreme Court gave President Obama a lot of room on Obamacare..."

Rapid Response 47

121,213 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "The national emergency is avoiding a national emergency... He is able to use the economic might of the U.S. to avoid a hot war, so why wouldn't we do that?"

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "The national emergency is avoiding a national emergency... He is able to use the economic might of the U.S. to avoid a hot war, so why wouldn't we do that?"

Rapid Response 47

124,427 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "Greenland is essential to the U.S. national security... President Trump is being strategic. He's looking beyond this year, he's looking beyond next year, to what could happen for a battle in the arctic. We are not going to outsource our national security."

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "Greenland is essential to the U.S. national security... President Trump is being strategic. He's looking beyond this year, he's looking beyond next year, to what could happen for a battle in the arctic. We are not going to outsource our national security."

Rapid Response 47

739,014 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Wayne Allyn Root: A national security emergency isn’t the same as an executive order. It’s the SAVE America Act on steroids. It’s a national security emergency for elections. You can’t take a national security emergency to court; you have to get a two-thirds vote in both Houses of Congress to overcome a national security emergency. It could actually be in effect for the midterms and democrats could not stop it. Sir Wayne Allyn Root - TV & Radio Host

Wayne Allyn Root: A national security emergency isn’t the same as an executive order. It’s the SAVE America Act on steroids. It’s a national security emergency for elections. You can’t take a national security emergency to court; you have to get a two-thirds vote in both Houses of Congress to overcome a national security emergency. It could actually be in effect for the midterms and democrats could not stop it. Sir Wayne Allyn Root - TV & Radio Host

Bannon’s WarRoom

45,279 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Ted Cruz says acquiring Greenland is a smart move for U.S. security and the economy, citing its critical minerals and strategic position as China and Russia ramp up activity in the Arctic: “President Trump is exactly right that it is overwhelmingly in the national security interest and economic interest to acquire Greenland. Economically, they have vast rare earth minerals and critical minerals there that are incredibly important to our economy and national defense. And from a national security standpoint, Greenland’s location in the Arctic is vitally important, especially with both China and Russia becoming more active and aggressive in the Arctic. The question is how this is going to happen, and I think the answer is that it is going to happen through a voluntarily negotiated acquisition. The media acts like there is something bizarre and unusual about the notion of acquiring territory. If you go back to Thomas Jefferson, he signed the Louisiana Purchase, acquiring about half of what is today the United States.”

Ted Cruz says acquiring Greenland is a smart move for U.S. security and the economy, citing its critical minerals and strategic position as China and Russia ramp up activity in the Arctic: “President Trump is exactly right that it is overwhelmingly in the national security interest and economic interest to acquire Greenland. Economically, they have vast rare earth minerals and critical minerals there that are incredibly important to our economy and national defense. And from a national security standpoint, Greenland’s location in the Arctic is vitally important, especially with both China and Russia becoming more active and aggressive in the Arctic. The question is how this is going to happen, and I think the answer is that it is going to happen through a voluntarily negotiated acquisition. The media acts like there is something bizarre and unusual about the notion of acquiring territory. If you go back to Thomas Jefferson, he signed the Louisiana Purchase, acquiring about half of what is today the United States.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

116,269 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

President Trump came to Detroit and said out loud – in Detroit – it might be time to sell Chinese vehicles in the United States. That is an economic and national security issue.

President Trump came to Detroit and said out loud – in Detroit – it might be time to sell Chinese vehicles in the United States. That is an economic and national security issue.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

22,681 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 TREASURY SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT JUST URGED EVERY SENATOR TO VOTE YES ON THE #BITCOIN CLARITY ACT THIS BILL "IS ESSENTIAL TO ENSURING AMERICA WINS THE GLOBAL RACE FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY" "ECONOMIC SECURITY IS NATIONAL SECURITY" CLEAR RULES FOR CRYPTO ARE COMING. ₿ELIEVE 🔥🔥

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 TREASURY SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT JUST URGED EVERY SENATOR TO VOTE YES ON THE #BITCOIN CLARITY ACT THIS BILL "IS ESSENTIAL TO ENSURING AMERICA WINS THE GLOBAL RACE FOR NEW TECHNOLOGY" "ECONOMIC SECURITY IS NATIONAL SECURITY" CLEAR RULES FOR CRYPTO ARE COMING. ₿ELIEVE 🔥🔥

The Bitcoin Historian

48,587 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

PRESIDENT TRUMP on SHIELD OF THE AMERICAS: This is the largest and most powerful alliance for economic and national security ever to convene in the Western Hemisphere.

PRESIDENT TRUMP on SHIELD OF THE AMERICAS: This is the largest and most powerful alliance for economic and national security ever to convene in the Western Hemisphere.

Department of State

141,271 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten