Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING: Trump Trade advisor, Peter Navarro, ridiculously claims that Auto tariffs will raise $100 billion and other tariffs will raise $600 billion a year. This is such a gaslighting attempt to mislead. No, they will NOT raise this much money. Not even close In 2024, the U.S. brought in...

834,574 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von AnatolijUkraine
AnatolijUkrainevor 1 Jahr

Navarro’s math isn’t just bad—it’s fantasy economics. Tariffs don’t magically print billions, they hike prices and tank demand. Consumers pay the price, not China.

Profilbild von Slingshot News
Slingshot Newsvor 1 Jahr

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Here’s How Donald Trump Can Break China’s Battery Monopoly What do YOU think about this idea? Let us know in the comments ⬇️ Be sure to follow @NewsSlingshot for more exclusive reports!

Profilbild von Scarlett
Scarlettvor 1 Jahr

All they do is gaslight and use misdirection to try and confuse their constituents into believing the lies. They are wonderful manipulators.

Profilbild von Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassensteinvor 1 Jahr

Exactly

Profilbild von 🇺🇸 Ryan 🇺🇸
🇺🇸 Ryan 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Tariffs will raise money from the imports. That will make buyers shift to American made cars. That is the whole point.

Profilbild von Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassensteinvor 1 Jahr

If buyers shift to American-made products, then the tariff revenue will fall. You get that right? Additionally, other countries will implement similar tariffs meaning US manufacturers will generate less revenue from foreign sales. So yes, US companies will make more in America, but less abroad, all while, prices increase for Americans and tariff revenue stays the same or even falls.

Profilbild von Stan Portman
Stan Portmanvor 1 Jahr

Tariffs don’t magically print money; they raise prices and kill demand.

Profilbild von Make Men Great Again
Make Men Great Againvor 1 Jahr

Trump’s plan worked because it made sense, not fantasy math.

Profilbild von Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassensteinvor 1 Jahr

It worked? How do you figure? All I'm seeing is prices still going up, the stock market falling sharply, and recession fears skyrocketing.

Profilbild von CanadaFirst
CanadaFirstvor 1 Jahr

Americans have gone back on education, science, healthcare, knowledge about economics They chose an idiot for president because he offered WEF as a boogie man to explain away their issues rather than looking inwards Don’t fix the real problem folks You are headed to medieval times, conquering shit 🤣🤣🤣🇨🇦

Profilbild von Pamela -Wysox, Pa🌍🐾💙
Pamela -Wysox, Pa🌍🐾💙vor 1 Jahr

trump is going to bankrupt this country just he did to 4 Casinos.

Ähnliche Videos

Trump claims tariffs will make America rich again, but that’s not how it works. Tariffs aren’t paid by other countries—they’re paid by Americans. It’s not a tax on countries like China; it’s a tax on the stuff we buy. Here’s how it works: when the government puts a tariff on something, it raises the price of that product. The idea is to make imported goods more expensive so people buy American-made products instead. Sounds good, right? The problem is, most things we use in the U.S. are made overseas, and it would take years—or even decades—to make them here. And in some cases, it might never happen because it costs too much to produce those goods locally. For example, if something costs $50 and a tariff adds $5, the new price is $55. That extra cost comes out of your pocket. This can cause inflation, making everything more expensive, and people either stop buying or have to spend more because there are no cheaper options. So, who gets the money from tariffs? The U.S. government collects it, but it’s not paid by China or any other country. It’s paid by you—the American consumer. The U.S. can’t tax other countries directly, so the burden falls on taxpayers here. Tariffs can work if the product being taxed is already made in the U.S. For example, if China floods the market with super-cheap goods that hurt local manufacturers, tariffs can make those imports more expensive, giving American businesses a chance to compete. But slapping tariffs on goods we don’t make here—or won’t make for years—just makes things more expensive for everyone. That’s why no president has wanted to be known as a "tariff president." They knew tariffs are really just taxes on Americans and can backfire politically. If tariffs drive up prices and hurt voters’ wallets, it could mean big trouble in the next election. Republicans might certainly lose in 2026.

Simon Ateba

50,090 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When Adam’s stock price dropped by 92% he borrowed money to buy back $6 billion in stock. That bet made the company more than $60 billion: “If no one's going to buy our shares why don't we just start buying our own shares? The company at the bottom was worth $3.8 billion. And we were generating over a billion dollars of EBITDA. Well in theory we could buy back 20% of the shares of the company just in the next year if we really believed in the path we were on. So we kicked that off. But we did it a little bit differently than what most companies do. Most companies go out and say I'm going to buy shares from the public markets and just take shares back. But you don't know who's on the other side of that trade. On the other hand we knew that we had a cap table where about 50% of the shares were going to sell at some point over the coming years. We had private equity investors that owned roughly 50% of the shares of the company alongside some other founders that were no longer there. So instead of going to the public we went to the shareholders that we knew were going to sell and got them to agree to sell back to us over time. And so for the following 18 months we ended up deploying around $6 billion of buybacks using our own capital and we leveraged some to buy back shares in the company. And over time that ended up creating somewhere in the neighborhood of $50 to $60 billion of actual proceeds from the buyback. It was one of the most successful buybacks in the history of companies.”

David Senra

518,747 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

When Adam’s stock price dropped by 92% he borrowed money to buy back $6 billion in stock. That bet made the company more than $60 billion: “If no one's going to buy our shares why don't we just start buying our own shares? The company at the bottom was worth $3.8 billion. And we were generating over a billion dollars of EBITDA. Well in theory we could buy back 20% of the shares of the company just in the next year if we really believed in the path we were on. So we kicked that off. But we did it a little bit differently than what most companies do. Most companies go out and say I'm going to buy shares from the public markets and just take shares back. But you don't know who's on the other side of that trade. On the other hand we knew that we had a cap table where about 50% of the shares were going to sell at some point over the coming years. We had private equity investors that owned roughly 50% of the shares of the company alongside some other founders that were no longer there. So instead of going to the public we went to the shareholders that we knew were going to sell and got them to agree to sell back to us over time. And so for the following 18 months we ended up deploying around $6 billion of buybacks using our own capital and we leveraged some to buy back shares in the company. And over time that ended up creating somewhere in the neighborhood of $50 to $60 billion of actual proceeds from the buyback. It was one of the most successful buybacks in the history of companies.”

David Senra

154,426 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten