BREAKING: Tucker Carlson reports Russia is actively considering using nuclear weapons against Europe.

They are literally going to blow up the world instead of tell us who the pedophiles are.

I miss the Fox News days.

Fake news. They’re pointed at Tuckers new house in Shariaville. Not to worry Europe.

Russian mouthpiece.

I don’t believe it. Russia knows this could lead to the end of civilization.

Hit Tel Aviv, the rest of the world are just their victims.

Obama said the quiet part out loud and a former CIA whistleblower just confirmed the entire corrupt system behind it. Listen to CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou expose how America provoked the Ukraine war to feed the war economy: Putin asked Clinton about joining NATO. Clinton refused, but promised NATO wouldn’t expand to Russia’s borders. Then Obama told Putin the same thing about Ukraine 👉🏼 “it won’t happen.” And Biden blew it all up by declaring Ukraine “a great addition to NATO.” Three administrations. Three broken promises. One engineered proxy war. Here’s my deep-dive exposing the war economy that requires these forever wars: If Americans don’t wake up now, the Empire will drag us into the next one before we even bury the last.

And how exactly would he know?

WWIII incoming all to hide a massive financial collapse.

Russian, Iranian, Qatari propaganda channel, Tucker is worse than Al Jazeera in English

@EndRaceHating He also predicted that if the US bombed Iran last June it would spark a major war and result in thousands of US casualties. His “predictions” mean nothing.

What ever happened to ending the war on day one @realDonaldTrump?

Tucker sure is plugged in to all the nations stirring the pot. Yet his silence on the atrocities in Iran is the most telling. He’ll rep Qatar. Spread misinformation to engender fear of Russia. And praise how peaceful Islam is. What he won’t do is focus on anything even remotely close to what is good for our great nation. Tucker isn’t America First. He’s Carlson Only.

Nothing puts White replacement into perspective like realizing that if London was nuked 47% of the people killed would be non White foreigners. (London is only 53% White)

@HussainShafiei Russian propaganda by a USian

And yet, Europeans do not consider Russia an enemy. All of this was engineered by the United States to separate the EU from Russia and to weaken Europe, which will once again be weaponized against Russia. The USA and its parasites represent a dangerous state that should be neutralized and isolated as soon as possible.

There it is

I've been a huge fan of yours for years but, you've lost a lot of credibility now, Tucker. I don't believe you.

Fact check #99999.

@barnes_law They will 💯 be justified too.

Bullshit. We have nukes too.

I am not shocked! The EU'S demands has impeded this war coming to an end. When has Russia ever attacked a NATO country? However, the EU constantly lies about President Putin being a threat to NATO countries 🙄! A President can only take so much! 🇺🇲

You are full of shit. There is a long way from saber rattling to the execution. Even Putin is not into self-annihilation. Only the crazy mullahs are into martyring themselves. You are just trying to stir up controversy for clicks.

Putin rn

Sucks for Europe. End NATO, not our problem.

Tucker is also a paid agent of Qatar now. Anything he says is completely irrelevant.

We Irish who have no gripe with the Russians will suffer the consequences of the fallout if they nuke GB.

Nuke's couldn't "take out" Germany and the UK. Key areas, sure... but let's not go.. nuclear.

Yeah, Tucker dropping the nuclear apocalypse mixtape again like he’s trying to set the algorithm on fire and sell fear like it’s bottled water in a hurricane, because “Russia considering nuking Europe” is the ultimate click-magnet sentence that hijacks nervous systems and melts critical thinking, and let’s be real, if that button was actually about to get pushed, you wouldn’t be hearing it first from a podcast rant, you’d see markets convulsing, militaries going DEFCON spicy, satellites lighting up like a Christmas tree, and every serious intel channel screaming bloody murder, not just dramatic eyebrow theater for engagement farming, nuclear threats get waved around in geopolitics like drunk dudes posturing in a parking lot, loud, reckless, mostly bluff, because everyone with two brain cells knows once that door opens there’s no winner, no victory lap, no podcast downloads left to count, so yeah stay sharp, watch real indicators not headline porn, don’t let fear merchants run your emotions like a stolen car, power is staying calm, reading the board, and not letting every loudmouth with a mic turn your brain into a panic factory, hype fades, consequences don’t 😈🔥

Russia’s revised nuclear use doctrine, updated in late 2024 and further examined through early 2025 analyses, represents one of the most consequential shifts in global nuclear posture since the end of the Cold War. It signals a lowered threshold for potential nuclear use, the expansion of defense parameters to include Belarus, and an explicit acknowledgment of non-nuclear and even cyber or aerospace threats as potential triggers. Let’s break it down clearly and systematically: ⚙️ Core Structural Changes (2024 Doctrine Update) The revised policy document — “Fundamentals of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence” — replaces the 2020 version and includes five key conditions that could trigger nuclear use, as confirmed by multiple analyses (Arms Control Association, NIPP, USIP, Jamestown, RUSI): 1Launch-on-warning:
Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if there is reliable data on the launch of ballistic missiles attacking Russian or allied territories. 2Use of WMDs:
Immediate nuclear response if any adversary uses nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction against Russia or its allies. 3Attacks on nuclear infrastructure:
Nuclear retaliation permitted if an adversary attacks state or military infrastructure that could compromise Russia’s nuclear command and control systems. 4Conventional aggression against Russia or Belarus:
The Kremlin now explicitly includes Belarus — part of the so-called “Union State.” Nuclear use is authorized if such aggression “creates a critical threat to sovereignty or territorial integrity,” which is a deliberate softening of the earlier threshold of “threatening the very existence of the state.” 5Massive aerospace or drone attacks:
A new clause authorizes nuclear response to “reliable data on the massive launch of aerospace attack means” — including tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, hypersonic weapons, and drones — crossing Russian borders. 🧭 Key Doctrinal Expansions •Lowered Threshold:
The 2020 doctrine limited nuclear response to existential threats. The 2024 doctrine replaces this with “critical threats to sovereignty or territorial integrity,” vastly widening the permissible scope for nuclear first use. •“Joint Attack” Clause:
Russia now considers aggression by a non-nuclear state that is supported by a nuclear state to be a joint attack.
→ Translation: if Ukraine uses long-range U.S., British, or French weapons to hit targets inside Russia, Moscow may treat it as a nuclear-level provocation by NATO itself. •Explicit Coverage of Belarus:
For the first time, Belarus is named in the doctrine — part of integrating Minsk into Russian nuclear decision-making. Joint nuclear exercises throughout 2024 confirmed that Belarusian units can deliver Russian nuclear weapons pre-positioned on their territory. •Inclusion of “Aerospace and Drone Attacks”:
This clause explicitly accounts for the modern reality of drone swarm warfare and hypersonics. It means even non-nuclear means of strategic attack could, in Kremlin interpretation, justify nuclear retaliation.

If attacked Not 🇪🇺only