Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BREAKING: 🇮🇷🇷🇺 Unconfirmed reports suggest Iran may have received Mi-28 attack helicopters, following earlier indications that Tehran had placed an order for the platform, potentially signaling a new addition to its military capabilities.

246,817 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran's latest attack struck U.S military facilities in Kuwait and the UAE, but the timing may be more important than the attack itself. The previous U.S-Iran exchange had effectively stopped. Washington decided not to retaliate against Iran's last barrage and reports suggest Trump’s team is actively trying to avoid another major escalation before the midterms. Iran attacked again anyway. And to understand why, look at what Washington is doing behind the scenes. The U.S is intensifying its economic campaign against Tehran, reportedly instructing embassies around the world to pressure governments to cut Iranian trade, with countries, companies and individuals potentially threatened with sanctions or a loss of access to the dollar system. Meanwhile, the UAE has become an important partner in Washington's attempt to keep oil moving through Hormuz and tighten the economic screws on Iran. Then Iran hits U.S-linked military infrastructure in the UAE and Kuwait. That makes these strikes look less like retaliation for something America already did and more like a warning about what comes next: If Washington turns the Gulf into the infrastructure for an economic war against Iran, Tehran may turn that same infrastructure into the battlefield. And that creates a serious problem for Trump's apparent pivot from military war to economic war. Sanctions were supposed to provide a way of squeezing Iran without another major exchange of missiles. Iran may be signalling that it doesn't intend to let America separate the two. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

340,144 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Glenn Diesen: Iran may no longer let America decide when the war starts For months, the U.S. has held one enormous advantage over Iran: escalation control. Washington can attack, pause, move toward diplomacy, then potentially attack again when conditions are more favorable. Glenn Diesen thinks Tehran is increasingly determined to take that option away. “If the U.S. know they can just stop the fighting whenever they want, then why not try another attack here or there?” His argument is that Iran may now move toward something considerably more dangerous: striking first when it sees preparations for another major U.S. or Israeli attack. Refueling aircraft assembling. Runways becoming active. Forces moving into position. “There's no reason to wait.” Diesen argues Tehran may not even consider such action a preemptive strike because, from its perspective, the war never actually ended. That may also explain the increasingly aggressive behavior around American warships. Diesen believes Iran may previously have avoided hitting them not because it lacked the capability, but because killing large numbers of U.S. sailors would force Washington dramatically higher up the escalation ladder. Now, he says, Tehran appears to be signaling that restraint may have limits. The strategic shift is subtle but potentially enormous: Iran isn't merely trying to deter the next American attack. It's trying to deny Washington the ability to choose when it happens. Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

295,795 просмотров • 1 месяц назад