Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨BREAKING Minister for Social Security and Disability, Sir Stephen Timms, faces questions after attending the Muslim Council of Britain’s (MCB) leadership dinner last Monday. Despite Labour ministers assuring Nick Timothy MP in the Commons that the government would uphold the long-standing position of non-engagement with the MCB, Timms, along...

19,847 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I resigned the Labour whip during Wakefield Council meeting. Whilst speaking in a debate on austerity and welfare cuts, it became clear that the Labour Group are unwilling to genuinely represent the needs and interests of our district. Instead of supporting my motion in demanding an end to austerity, the reversal of all welfare cuts and the proper financing of local government, among other things. Labour Councillors overwhelmingly responded by watering it down, defending or excusing the government's actions and deflecting back onto the Tories and Lib Dems. Yes, criticism of the Tories and Lib Dems is warranted for their involvement in austerity over the last 14 years but, it is a Labour government that is doing it now. If we are not prepared to oppose this government with the same veracity as we did the Tories, then we are nothing more than hypocrites. Putting the current welfare cuts into perspective, they are the fifth largest tranche of cuts since 2010 and the largest since 2015. Essentially meaning that this so-called Labour Government are cutting benefits at higher levels than 9 of the 14 years the Tories were in office. Aditionally, the current disability cuts go further than the Tories were prepared to go to in 2018, as they are 3x larger than the cuts that Ian Duncan Smith resigned over. Whilst there have been other issues within the Labour Group and the wider Party that have influenced my decision, this debate was the final straw. The Labour Group are unwilling to call the government's cuts for what they really are - a continuation of Tory austerity. I was already suspended from the party for voting against the Labour Group's austerity budget which, reduced Council services by £29m, cut 250 jobs and raised Council tax by the maximum. I cannot continue to legitimise a Labour Cabinet which lied about the scale of the job cuts, and tried to decieve residents when u-turning on cuts to libraries and the garden waste services. I cannot remain a member of a political group that conducts itself in this manner, and is willing to stand by whilst the government betrays its own values and the working-class communities it is supposed to represent. Equally, I cannot continue to legitimise a Labour government that has reneged on its manifesto commitments and is attacking the poorest and most vulnerable in our society. This is not the Labour Party I joined, and it is not the Labour Party people voted for. Our district deserves better than Councillors who are putting their own positions and allowances over the needs of our residents. We deserve politicians, at all levels of government, who are honest and will genuinely represent our interests. This decision is not me leaving the Labour Party - it is the Labour Party that has left us. They do not represent working-class communities anymore and I could not look my residents in the eye if I were to continue legitimising the disgraceful choices of this Party. Just to be clear, whilst I have resigned the Labour whip, I will continue to represent Hemsworth, Kinsley, Fitzwilliam, South Hiendley & Felkirk. It will just be from the opposition benches, as an Independent Councillor. Solidarity, Jake

Jake Williamson

195,962 views • 1 year ago

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands

The Heartlands Tribune

105,438 views • 4 months ago

FATHER TAKES HIS NON VERBAL AUTISTIC SON TO VIRTUE SIGNAL AT REGENTS PARK MOSQUE Regents Park Mosque is alleged to have links to the Muslim Brotherhood via it's Director General Dr. Ahmad Al-Dubayan. Dr. Ahmad Al-Dubayan was one of the founding members of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) in 1997. He served as General Secretary for that Islamist/Muslim Brotherhood linked organisation. In March 2014 the Conservative Government led by David Cameron commissioned a review into the Muslim Brotherhood. This government commissioned report is called 'The Jenkins Review' (as it was led by British Ambassador Sir John Jenkins). The UK government never fully published his report because the report contained sensitive intelligence, analysis of sources, and detailed information that could compromise national security or ongoing investigations. Let that sink in for a moment. What I can say is that certain elements of the report were leaked to the press, also Theresa May gave a statement to the House of Commons on December 17th 2014 about it. What conclusions were drawn from this report? 1) The review concluded that the Muslim Brotherhood was not a single, monolithic organization but a complex movement with both political and extremist wings. 2) It assessed that aspects of the Brotherhood's ideology and tactics were contrary to British values and the rule of law. 3) It identified a network of individuals and organizations in the UK linked to the Brotherhood. It is notable that Gulf nations such as the UAE and Egypt have outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood because of their extremist/terrorist links. The Muslim brotherhood has 'offshoots' such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS. And this silly virtue signalling father has taken his non-verbal autistic son to simp for a mosque that is led by someone with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. Let that sink in.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

142,281 views • 8 months ago

Hugh Grant, "Politicians mistakenly believe that their entire careers and fate rely on sucking up to the owners of tabloid newspapers" "But such was the pressure of the big newspaper barons on government, and such was the cowardice of government, that they found a tiny technical loophole in the legislative process" "Here we are 12 years later, having waited 12 years for a Labour government, Labour said to victims of press abuse with their terrible stories. Labour said: its ok guys, the Tories are awful, once we're here we'll take care of this" "Suddenly as the election loomed last year, dead silence from Labour" "Since Labour have been in government, absolutely nothing" "On the contrary, what we're now seeing is a repetition of what happened under the Blair government" "Where you have a Labour government sucking up to the very organisations that perpetrated these abuses in the first place" "You have Keir Starmer the Prime Minister writing articles for The Sun. Having lunch with Lachlan Murdoch last year. Hiring the ex Chief Operating Officer of News UK, the Murdoch news company in this country, as the most important communications civil servant in Number 10" "Arranging for Rupert Murdoch to be at the big state banquet for Trump. And having him sit right next to Morgan McSweeney who is the PM's chief of staff" "And it's pretty hard to stomach for the families who were promised so much by Labour" Tom Bradby, "Are you saying to me that the pledge that Keir Starmer made to you and other victims was unequivocal, and that you feel personally betrayed by the fact they have done nothing about it" Hugh Grant, "Yeah, all the victims feel personally betrayed by all the politicians and most depressingly by this Labour government" "Labour were marvellous in opposition" "Labour politicians were very supportive to these families who were really brave, and then when push came to shove, they made this decision clearly. And it's a mistaken decision" "That it's more important for them, for their political careers. For the sake of their party, their bl**dy party, that they make nice with the big newspaper barons, than they do what's right for these families" "And lets face it, for the country" "And what Hacked Off if here to do right now is to try and put pressure on this government on this prime minister to finally do something that will protect those families" "We're asking the PM to do something, to create a law, that makes newspapers obey basic standards of decency" "And in doing that to create a press in this country that we can be proud of, that we can rely on. Which is absolutely essential in this day and age" "I watch, we all watch, liberal democracies that we have happily enjoyed for 30, 40, 50 years, gradually start to disappear" "If you don't have a reliable press, you're in real trouble. You're left to the cowboys of social media"

Farrukh

374,166 views • 10 months ago