Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨BREAKING Minister for Social Security and Disability, Sir Stephen Timms, faces questions after attending the Muslim Council of Britain’s (MCB) leadership dinner last Monday. Despite Labour ministers assuring Nick Timothy MP in the Commons that the government would uphold the long-standing position of non-engagement with the MCB, Timms, along...

sirwg202110's profile picture

Starmer Sycophant

21,676 subscribers

19,847 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 The Muslim Council of Britain was given a platform at yesterday’s Together hate march. Dr Wajid Akhter taking on the "far right": “Unity means learning from the people of Gaza.” What? And how dare he invoke the Cenotaph as a symbol of anti-fascism while addressing a crowd of fascists. The government still maintains a policy of non-engagement with the MCB, yet that didn’t stop Labour MPs sharing the same platform. The renewed mainstreaming of the MCB is a big threat.
2:25

🚨 The Muslim Council of Britain was given a platform at yesterday’s Together hate march. Dr Wajid Akhter taking on the "far right": “Unity means learning from the people of Gaza.” What? And how dare he invoke the Cenotaph as a symbol of anti-fascism while addressing a crowd of fascists. The government still maintains a policy of non-engagement with the MCB, yet that didn’t stop Labour MPs sharing the same platform. The renewed mainstreaming of the MCB is a big threat.

Subversive Force

11,334 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The Labour Government have put our defence, safety and security at risk by surrendering the sovereignty of the Chagos Islands. Labour cannot answer simple questions about their plans, including the costs and the long term future of our base at Diego Garcia. In an uncertain and dangerous world, the Chagos Islands are a key strategic asset for us and it's reckless and irresponsible of Labour to compromise them. With a new Government elected in Mauritius and a new President elected in the USA, Ministers must review these plans.
2:26

The Labour Government have put our defence, safety and security at risk by surrendering the sovereignty of the Chagos Islands. Labour cannot answer simple questions about their plans, including the costs and the long term future of our base at Diego Garcia. In an uncertain and dangerous world, the Chagos Islands are a key strategic asset for us and it's reckless and irresponsible of Labour to compromise them. With a new Government elected in Mauritius and a new President elected in the USA, Ministers must review these plans.

Priti Patel MP

79,814 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

John Prescott, the former Labour Deputy Prime Minister has died at the age of 86. He was a straight-talking, sometimes controversial MP for nearly 40 years, and at the heart of Government for 10. He passed away surrounded by his family after a battle with Alzheimer's.
0:46

John Prescott, the former Labour Deputy Prime Minister has died at the age of 86. He was a straight-talking, sometimes controversial MP for nearly 40 years, and at the heart of Government for 10. He passed away surrounded by his family after a battle with Alzheimer's.

Good Morning Britain

51,307 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Free Speech Union has long warned that the official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — would be used to silence legitimate criticism of Islam. Within weeks, Labour MPs had reported Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, branded him an “Islamophobe”, and called on the Prime Minister to remove him from his post. Last week, 27 Labour MPs reported Reform UK to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), accusing the party of Islamophobia and urging the Commission to investigate. Led by Afzal Khan, a leading campaigner for an official Islamophobia definition, the MPs cited Nigel Farage’s criticism of the mass Muslim prayer event in Trafalgar Square, alongside comments made by Lee Anderson and Sarah Pochin. This definition is already being weaponised to silence those who criticise Islam. It amounts to an Islamic blasphemy law by the back door. Hear from FSU Campaigns Officer Max Thompson 👇
1:06

The Free Speech Union has long warned that the official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — would be used to silence legitimate criticism of Islam. Within weeks, Labour MPs had reported Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, branded him an “Islamophobe”, and called on the Prime Minister to remove him from his post. Last week, 27 Labour MPs reported Reform UK to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), accusing the party of Islamophobia and urging the Commission to investigate. Led by Afzal Khan, a leading campaigner for an official Islamophobia definition, the MPs cited Nigel Farage’s criticism of the mass Muslim prayer event in Trafalgar Square, alongside comments made by Lee Anderson and Sarah Pochin. This definition is already being weaponised to silence those who criticise Islam. It amounts to an Islamic blasphemy law by the back door. Hear from FSU Campaigns Officer Max Thompson 👇

The Free Speech Union

37,498 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I was in Makerfield on a couple of occasions. I’m delighted Andy Burnham won the by-election and he will be a great MP and voice for Labour. Outside of Westminster, everyone I speak to cannot get their head around the idea of changing Prime Ministers now - especially after the Tory leadership chaos they voted for Keir Starmer and The Labour Party to draw a line under. It’s time to unite and get on with governing the country. 🇬🇧
0:54

I was in Makerfield on a couple of occasions. I’m delighted Andy Burnham won the by-election and he will be a great MP and voice for Labour. Outside of Westminster, everyone I speak to cannot get their head around the idea of changing Prime Ministers now - especially after the Tory leadership chaos they voted for Keir Starmer and The Labour Party to draw a line under. It’s time to unite and get on with governing the country. 🇬🇧

Kevin Craig

42,145 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I resigned the Labour whip during Wakefield Council meeting. Whilst speaking in a debate on austerity and welfare cuts, it became clear that the Labour Group are unwilling to genuinely represent the needs and interests of our district. Instead of supporting my motion in demanding an end to austerity, the reversal of all welfare cuts and the proper financing of local government, among other things. Labour Councillors overwhelmingly responded by watering it down, defending or excusing the government's actions and deflecting back onto the Tories and Lib Dems. Yes, criticism of the Tories and Lib Dems is warranted for their involvement in austerity over the last 14 years but, it is a Labour government that is doing it now. If we are not prepared to oppose this government with the same veracity as we did the Tories, then we are nothing more than hypocrites. Putting the current welfare cuts into perspective, they are the fifth largest tranche of cuts since 2010 and the largest since 2015. Essentially meaning that this so-called Labour Government are cutting benefits at higher levels than 9 of the 14 years the Tories were in office. Aditionally, the current disability cuts go further than the Tories were prepared to go to in 2018, as they are 3x larger than the cuts that Ian Duncan Smith resigned over. Whilst there have been other issues within the Labour Group and the wider Party that have influenced my decision, this debate was the final straw. The Labour Group are unwilling to call the government's cuts for what they really are - a continuation of Tory austerity. I was already suspended from the party for voting against the Labour Group's austerity budget which, reduced Council services by £29m, cut 250 jobs and raised Council tax by the maximum. I cannot continue to legitimise a Labour Cabinet which lied about the scale of the job cuts, and tried to decieve residents when u-turning on cuts to libraries and the garden waste services. I cannot remain a member of a political group that conducts itself in this manner, and is willing to stand by whilst the government betrays its own values and the working-class communities it is supposed to represent. Equally, I cannot continue to legitimise a Labour government that has reneged on its manifesto commitments and is attacking the poorest and most vulnerable in our society. This is not the Labour Party I joined, and it is not the Labour Party people voted for. Our district deserves better than Councillors who are putting their own positions and allowances over the needs of our residents. We deserve politicians, at all levels of government, who are honest and will genuinely represent our interests. This decision is not me leaving the Labour Party - it is the Labour Party that has left us. They do not represent working-class communities anymore and I could not look my residents in the eye if I were to continue legitimising the disgraceful choices of this Party. Just to be clear, whilst I have resigned the Labour whip, I will continue to represent Hemsworth, Kinsley, Fitzwilliam, South Hiendley & Felkirk. It will just be from the opposition benches, as an Independent Councillor. Solidarity, Jake
3:48

I resigned the Labour whip during Wakefield Council meeting. Whilst speaking in a debate on austerity and welfare cuts, it became clear that the Labour Group are unwilling to genuinely represent the needs and interests of our district. Instead of supporting my motion in demanding an end to austerity, the reversal of all welfare cuts and the proper financing of local government, among other things. Labour Councillors overwhelmingly responded by watering it down, defending or excusing the government's actions and deflecting back onto the Tories and Lib Dems. Yes, criticism of the Tories and Lib Dems is warranted for their involvement in austerity over the last 14 years but, it is a Labour government that is doing it now. If we are not prepared to oppose this government with the same veracity as we did the Tories, then we are nothing more than hypocrites. Putting the current welfare cuts into perspective, they are the fifth largest tranche of cuts since 2010 and the largest since 2015. Essentially meaning that this so-called Labour Government are cutting benefits at higher levels than 9 of the 14 years the Tories were in office. Aditionally, the current disability cuts go further than the Tories were prepared to go to in 2018, as they are 3x larger than the cuts that Ian Duncan Smith resigned over. Whilst there have been other issues within the Labour Group and the wider Party that have influenced my decision, this debate was the final straw. The Labour Group are unwilling to call the government's cuts for what they really are - a continuation of Tory austerity. I was already suspended from the party for voting against the Labour Group's austerity budget which, reduced Council services by £29m, cut 250 jobs and raised Council tax by the maximum. I cannot continue to legitimise a Labour Cabinet which lied about the scale of the job cuts, and tried to decieve residents when u-turning on cuts to libraries and the garden waste services. I cannot remain a member of a political group that conducts itself in this manner, and is willing to stand by whilst the government betrays its own values and the working-class communities it is supposed to represent. Equally, I cannot continue to legitimise a Labour government that has reneged on its manifesto commitments and is attacking the poorest and most vulnerable in our society. This is not the Labour Party I joined, and it is not the Labour Party people voted for. Our district deserves better than Councillors who are putting their own positions and allowances over the needs of our residents. We deserve politicians, at all levels of government, who are honest and will genuinely represent our interests. This decision is not me leaving the Labour Party - it is the Labour Party that has left us. They do not represent working-class communities anymore and I could not look my residents in the eye if I were to continue legitimising the disgraceful choices of this Party. Just to be clear, whilst I have resigned the Labour whip, I will continue to represent Hemsworth, Kinsley, Fitzwilliam, South Hiendley & Felkirk. It will just be from the opposition benches, as an Independent Councillor. Solidarity, Jake

Jake Williamson

195,962 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

An "Independent" candidate standing for election to Birmingham City Council has admitted his part in punching and kicking a resident on the campaign trail in 2022. Amer Khan, is standing for the "independent Candidate Alliance", a group overseen by weirdos Akhmed Yakoob and Shakeel Afsar, in the ward of North Edgbaston. He was among a group of supporters making a case at the time for Labour's Saqib Khan to take the seat. They were accompanied by Labour councillor, Mohammed Idrees, who was standing in nearby Alum Rock. Everywhere they go, the same, tribal politics.
0:41

An "Independent" candidate standing for election to Birmingham City Council has admitted his part in punching and kicking a resident on the campaign trail in 2022. Amer Khan, is standing for the "independent Candidate Alliance", a group overseen by weirdos Akhmed Yakoob and Shakeel Afsar, in the ward of North Edgbaston. He was among a group of supporters making a case at the time for Labour's Saqib Khan to take the seat. They were accompanied by Labour councillor, Mohammed Idrees, who was standing in nearby Alum Rock. Everywhere they go, the same, tribal politics.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

44,395 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands
0:58

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands

The Heartlands Tribune

105,438 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨📣 NEW BRIEFING An official definition of Islamophobia would be a direct threat to free speech. Last year, Communities Secretary Angela Rayner established a working group to draft one. In a new briefing, our Director of Policy and Research, David Rose, uncovers that all five members of the group have links to Islamist organisations. Even the only non-Muslim member — the chair, former Conservative MP and Attorney General Dominic Grieve — has admitted to taking advice from the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND), both organisations with a long record of promoting extreme views. Watch David below and read the full briefing in the comments 👇
1:47

🚨📣 NEW BRIEFING An official definition of Islamophobia would be a direct threat to free speech. Last year, Communities Secretary Angela Rayner established a working group to draft one. In a new briefing, our Director of Policy and Research, David Rose, uncovers that all five members of the group have links to Islamist organisations. Even the only non-Muslim member — the chair, former Conservative MP and Attorney General Dominic Grieve — has admitted to taking advice from the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND), both organisations with a long record of promoting extreme views. Watch David below and read the full briefing in the comments 👇

The Free Speech Union

28,590 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Victoria Derbyshire, "Labour say the tax rises are because of 14 years of broken services by the Conservative government" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "Labour are going to keep blaming the Conservative government for as long as they like.. It's such a boring argument by Labour" Victoria Derbyshire, "Boring?" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "Labour are in power, they made up a £22 billion hole.. It wasn't £22 billion" Nicholas Watt, "We discussed that last time.. It includes rises that the previous Conservative government did not factor in" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "It's not £22 billion.. It's not £22 billion.. These are Labour's choices" Alex Sobel, "First of all, early this year, the Conservative government was blaming the last Labour government in 2010" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "Maybe just answer my question" Alex Sobel, "I'm responding to your point. It's a bit rich now to say that we're literally three months into government and Labour are still blaming the last Conservative government that were in power this year"
0:58

Victoria Derbyshire, "Labour say the tax rises are because of 14 years of broken services by the Conservative government" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "Labour are going to keep blaming the Conservative government for as long as they like.. It's such a boring argument by Labour" Victoria Derbyshire, "Boring?" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "Labour are in power, they made up a £22 billion hole.. It wasn't £22 billion" Nicholas Watt, "We discussed that last time.. It includes rises that the previous Conservative government did not factor in" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "It's not £22 billion.. It's not £22 billion.. These are Labour's choices" Alex Sobel, "First of all, early this year, the Conservative government was blaming the last Labour government in 2010" David Cameron's sister-in-law, Emily Sheffield, "Maybe just answer my question" Alex Sobel, "I'm responding to your point. It's a bit rich now to say that we're literally three months into government and Labour are still blaming the last Conservative government that were in power this year"

Farrukh

282,315 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

FATHER TAKES HIS NON VERBAL AUTISTIC SON TO VIRTUE SIGNAL AT REGENTS PARK MOSQUE Regents Park Mosque is alleged to have links to the Muslim Brotherhood via it's Director General Dr. Ahmad Al-Dubayan. Dr. Ahmad Al-Dubayan was one of the founding members of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) in 1997. He served as General Secretary for that Islamist/Muslim Brotherhood linked organisation. In March 2014 the Conservative Government led by David Cameron commissioned a review into the Muslim Brotherhood. This government commissioned report is called 'The Jenkins Review' (as it was led by British Ambassador Sir John Jenkins). The UK government never fully published his report because the report contained sensitive intelligence, analysis of sources, and detailed information that could compromise national security or ongoing investigations. Let that sink in for a moment. What I can say is that certain elements of the report were leaked to the press, also Theresa May gave a statement to the House of Commons on December 17th 2014 about it. What conclusions were drawn from this report? 1) The review concluded that the Muslim Brotherhood was not a single, monolithic organization but a complex movement with both political and extremist wings. 2) It assessed that aspects of the Brotherhood's ideology and tactics were contrary to British values and the rule of law. 3) It identified a network of individuals and organizations in the UK linked to the Brotherhood. It is notable that Gulf nations such as the UAE and Egypt have outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood because of their extremist/terrorist links. The Muslim brotherhood has 'offshoots' such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS. And this silly virtue signalling father has taken his non-verbal autistic son to simp for a mosque that is led by someone with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. Let that sink in.
1:26

FATHER TAKES HIS NON VERBAL AUTISTIC SON TO VIRTUE SIGNAL AT REGENTS PARK MOSQUE Regents Park Mosque is alleged to have links to the Muslim Brotherhood via it's Director General Dr. Ahmad Al-Dubayan. Dr. Ahmad Al-Dubayan was one of the founding members of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) in 1997. He served as General Secretary for that Islamist/Muslim Brotherhood linked organisation. In March 2014 the Conservative Government led by David Cameron commissioned a review into the Muslim Brotherhood. This government commissioned report is called 'The Jenkins Review' (as it was led by British Ambassador Sir John Jenkins). The UK government never fully published his report because the report contained sensitive intelligence, analysis of sources, and detailed information that could compromise national security or ongoing investigations. Let that sink in for a moment. What I can say is that certain elements of the report were leaked to the press, also Theresa May gave a statement to the House of Commons on December 17th 2014 about it. What conclusions were drawn from this report? 1) The review concluded that the Muslim Brotherhood was not a single, monolithic organization but a complex movement with both political and extremist wings. 2) It assessed that aspects of the Brotherhood's ideology and tactics were contrary to British values and the rule of law. 3) It identified a network of individuals and organizations in the UK linked to the Brotherhood. It is notable that Gulf nations such as the UAE and Egypt have outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood because of their extremist/terrorist links. The Muslim brotherhood has 'offshoots' such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS. And this silly virtue signalling father has taken his non-verbal autistic son to simp for a mosque that is led by someone with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. Let that sink in.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

142,281 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Matthew Wright proves our point on LBC this morning. The official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — is already silencing legitimate debate and criticism of Islam and its practices. It amounts to a de facto Muslim blasphemy law. The treatment of Nick Timothy by Labour MPs is deeply sinister. The Shadow Justice Secretary criticised mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square, was reported to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, branded “Islamophobic”, and faced calls to resign from Labour MPs and even the Prime Minister. This morning, FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was invited on to discuss the comments made by Nick Timothy. Matthew Wright didn’t want to hear it. After the interview, he told another guest he had “closed her down” because she was “putting out anti-Muslim hatred”. Farcical. In a crowded field, Matthew is this week’s runner up as for chief enforcer of the blasphemy law this week. 👏
4:26

Matthew Wright proves our point on LBC this morning. The official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — is already silencing legitimate debate and criticism of Islam and its practices. It amounts to a de facto Muslim blasphemy law. The treatment of Nick Timothy by Labour MPs is deeply sinister. The Shadow Justice Secretary criticised mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square, was reported to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, branded “Islamophobic”, and faced calls to resign from Labour MPs and even the Prime Minister. This morning, FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was invited on to discuss the comments made by Nick Timothy. Matthew Wright didn’t want to hear it. After the interview, he told another guest he had “closed her down” because she was “putting out anti-Muslim hatred”. Farcical. In a crowded field, Matthew is this week’s runner up as for chief enforcer of the blasphemy law this week. 👏

The Free Speech Union

788,133 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

📣🚨 NEW FSU PODCAST EPISODE OUT NOW! Just when you think this government couldn’t get any more authoritarian, it’s pressing ahead with restricting the right to trial by jury. Tomorrow, the Courts and Tribunals Bill will have its second reading, and Labour MPs are gearing up to rebel against the government. On this week’s episode, the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young, is joined by Labour MP and former Shadow Attorney General Karl Turner MP, who has been leading the charge in Parliament to save our jury trials. Watch the full episode on our YouTube channel 👇
0:29

📣🚨 NEW FSU PODCAST EPISODE OUT NOW! Just when you think this government couldn’t get any more authoritarian, it’s pressing ahead with restricting the right to trial by jury. Tomorrow, the Courts and Tribunals Bill will have its second reading, and Labour MPs are gearing up to rebel against the government. On this week’s episode, the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young, is joined by Labour MP and former Shadow Attorney General Karl Turner MP, who has been leading the charge in Parliament to save our jury trials. Watch the full episode on our YouTube channel 👇

The Free Speech Union

21,658 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Breaking News🇬🇧⚡️: "How can Labour complain about Nigel's behaviour, when Burnham has appointed a fraudster as one of the most senior Ministers in the country. Absolutely outrageous decision". Former Tory Minister Jacob Rees-Mogg goes in on the utter contempt displayed by Labour towards the illigence of the British voters with the appointment of the convicted fraudster Louise Haigh who is now in charge of 'ethics and standards' in the Burnham Government. Sickening new lows from the UK.
0:31

Breaking News🇬🇧⚡️: "How can Labour complain about Nigel's behaviour, when Burnham has appointed a fraudster as one of the most senior Ministers in the country. Absolutely outrageous decision". Former Tory Minister Jacob Rees-Mogg goes in on the utter contempt displayed by Labour towards the illigence of the British voters with the appointment of the convicted fraudster Louise Haigh who is now in charge of 'ethics and standards' in the Burnham Government. Sickening new lows from the UK.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

55,308 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The “Return to Gaza” conference in Israel is currently taking place with a plan to re-establish Israeli settlements in Gaza on top of recently destroyed Palestinian communities. This conference is being attended by Israelis from all over the state, and even 12 cabinet ministers and parliament officials from the Israeli government. Ben Gvir, the Minister of National Security of Israel, along with other ministers, signed a petition for “victory and renewal of the settlement in Gaza” during the event. Attendees were filmed celebrating this move from Gvir.
0:25

The “Return to Gaza” conference in Israel is currently taking place with a plan to re-establish Israeli settlements in Gaza on top of recently destroyed Palestinian communities. This conference is being attended by Israelis from all over the state, and even 12 cabinet ministers and parliament officials from the Israeli government. Ben Gvir, the Minister of National Security of Israel, along with other ministers, signed a petition for “victory and renewal of the settlement in Gaza” during the event. Attendees were filmed celebrating this move from Gvir.

Middle East Eye

86,167 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Hugh Grant, "Politicians mistakenly believe that their entire careers and fate rely on sucking up to the owners of tabloid newspapers" "But such was the pressure of the big newspaper barons on government, and such was the cowardice of government, that they found a tiny technical loophole in the legislative process" "Here we are 12 years later, having waited 12 years for a Labour government, Labour said to victims of press abuse with their terrible stories. Labour said: its ok guys, the Tories are awful, once we're here we'll take care of this" "Suddenly as the election loomed last year, dead silence from Labour" "Since Labour have been in government, absolutely nothing" "On the contrary, what we're now seeing is a repetition of what happened under the Blair government" "Where you have a Labour government sucking up to the very organisations that perpetrated these abuses in the first place" "You have Keir Starmer the Prime Minister writing articles for The Sun. Having lunch with Lachlan Murdoch last year. Hiring the ex Chief Operating Officer of News UK, the Murdoch news company in this country, as the most important communications civil servant in Number 10" "Arranging for Rupert Murdoch to be at the big state banquet for Trump. And having him sit right next to Morgan McSweeney who is the PM's chief of staff" "And it's pretty hard to stomach for the families who were promised so much by Labour" Tom Bradby, "Are you saying to me that the pledge that Keir Starmer made to you and other victims was unequivocal, and that you feel personally betrayed by the fact they have done nothing about it" Hugh Grant, "Yeah, all the victims feel personally betrayed by all the politicians and most depressingly by this Labour government" "Labour were marvellous in opposition" "Labour politicians were very supportive to these families who were really brave, and then when push came to shove, they made this decision clearly. And it's a mistaken decision" "That it's more important for them, for their political careers. For the sake of their party, their bl**dy party, that they make nice with the big newspaper barons, than they do what's right for these families" "And lets face it, for the country" "And what Hacked Off if here to do right now is to try and put pressure on this government on this prime minister to finally do something that will protect those families" "We're asking the PM to do something, to create a law, that makes newspapers obey basic standards of decency" "And in doing that to create a press in this country that we can be proud of, that we can rely on. Which is absolutely essential in this day and age" "I watch, we all watch, liberal democracies that we have happily enjoyed for 30, 40, 50 years, gradually start to disappear" "If you don't have a reliable press, you're in real trouble. You're left to the cowboys of social media"
5:43

Hugh Grant, "Politicians mistakenly believe that their entire careers and fate rely on sucking up to the owners of tabloid newspapers" "But such was the pressure of the big newspaper barons on government, and such was the cowardice of government, that they found a tiny technical loophole in the legislative process" "Here we are 12 years later, having waited 12 years for a Labour government, Labour said to victims of press abuse with their terrible stories. Labour said: its ok guys, the Tories are awful, once we're here we'll take care of this" "Suddenly as the election loomed last year, dead silence from Labour" "Since Labour have been in government, absolutely nothing" "On the contrary, what we're now seeing is a repetition of what happened under the Blair government" "Where you have a Labour government sucking up to the very organisations that perpetrated these abuses in the first place" "You have Keir Starmer the Prime Minister writing articles for The Sun. Having lunch with Lachlan Murdoch last year. Hiring the ex Chief Operating Officer of News UK, the Murdoch news company in this country, as the most important communications civil servant in Number 10" "Arranging for Rupert Murdoch to be at the big state banquet for Trump. And having him sit right next to Morgan McSweeney who is the PM's chief of staff" "And it's pretty hard to stomach for the families who were promised so much by Labour" Tom Bradby, "Are you saying to me that the pledge that Keir Starmer made to you and other victims was unequivocal, and that you feel personally betrayed by the fact they have done nothing about it" Hugh Grant, "Yeah, all the victims feel personally betrayed by all the politicians and most depressingly by this Labour government" "Labour were marvellous in opposition" "Labour politicians were very supportive to these families who were really brave, and then when push came to shove, they made this decision clearly. And it's a mistaken decision" "That it's more important for them, for their political careers. For the sake of their party, their bl**dy party, that they make nice with the big newspaper barons, than they do what's right for these families" "And lets face it, for the country" "And what Hacked Off if here to do right now is to try and put pressure on this government on this prime minister to finally do something that will protect those families" "We're asking the PM to do something, to create a law, that makes newspapers obey basic standards of decency" "And in doing that to create a press in this country that we can be proud of, that we can rely on. Which is absolutely essential in this day and age" "I watch, we all watch, liberal democracies that we have happily enjoyed for 30, 40, 50 years, gradually start to disappear" "If you don't have a reliable press, you're in real trouble. You're left to the cowboys of social media"

Farrukh

374,166 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Serious allegations have been made concerning the conduct of Labour MP Willie Jackson and the Manakau Urban Māori Authority (MUMA). In the Cam Slater interview Matthew McCarten alleges Willie Jackson was appointed as an employee advocate for his wife - the CEO of MUMA. In this role he allegedly told the Chair of the board to make a report that detailed complaints and bullying by Jackson’s wife to disappear, despite having no offical position at MUMA. If true, Jackson’s position as an MP in the Labour Party is untenable.
4:09

Serious allegations have been made concerning the conduct of Labour MP Willie Jackson and the Manakau Urban Māori Authority (MUMA). In the Cam Slater interview Matthew McCarten alleges Willie Jackson was appointed as an employee advocate for his wife - the CEO of MUMA. In this role he allegedly told the Chair of the board to make a report that detailed complaints and bullying by Jackson’s wife to disappear, despite having no offical position at MUMA. If true, Jackson’s position as an MP in the Labour Party is untenable.

Suit and tie

21,684 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

“We’ve got a current Labour government headed by Keir Starmer at the moment and potentially in future headed by Andy Burnham makes no difference because both of them appear to have the same view on this and therefore the Labour government’s view won’t change and that is that they’ve decided that they can ban 16 year olds from accessing social media due to the vulnerability of their minds and how social media may well indeed manipulate their minds and due to that vulnerability. The Labour Party doesn’t want 16 or under accessing social media. Meanwhile, an 11 year old, according to the Labour Party, does have the mental capacity to decide that they are not a boy or that they are not a girl, that they’ve been born in the wrong body and that they can irreversibly alter the way that their body grows their sexual organs by stopping and blocking puberty chemically. So an 11 year old can make that decision. But at the same time, a 16 or 15 year old can’t access social media. It is a very, very strange position that the Labour government has taken, explained by the facts, of course, as you saw Andy Burnham there giving £100,000 as a grant as mayor of Manchester to an organisation that was lobbying for this change. Also explained by the fact that Keir Starmer and the Labour government clearly don’t care about the mental wellbeing of children, otherwise they wouldn’t be allowing 11 year olds to block their own puberty. And so this online safety in 16 year olds, what that’s really about is introducing digital ID for every single citizen by stealth, using the name of the children and protecting the children as the excuse.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED
1:41

“We’ve got a current Labour government headed by Keir Starmer at the moment and potentially in future headed by Andy Burnham makes no difference because both of them appear to have the same view on this and therefore the Labour government’s view won’t change and that is that they’ve decided that they can ban 16 year olds from accessing social media due to the vulnerability of their minds and how social media may well indeed manipulate their minds and due to that vulnerability. The Labour Party doesn’t want 16 or under accessing social media. Meanwhile, an 11 year old, according to the Labour Party, does have the mental capacity to decide that they are not a boy or that they are not a girl, that they’ve been born in the wrong body and that they can irreversibly alter the way that their body grows their sexual organs by stopping and blocking puberty chemically. So an 11 year old can make that decision. But at the same time, a 16 or 15 year old can’t access social media. It is a very, very strange position that the Labour government has taken, explained by the facts, of course, as you saw Andy Burnham there giving £100,000 as a grant as mayor of Manchester to an organisation that was lobbying for this change. Also explained by the fact that Keir Starmer and the Labour government clearly don’t care about the mental wellbeing of children, otherwise they wouldn’t be allowing 11 year olds to block their own puberty. And so this online safety in 16 year olds, what that’s really about is introducing digital ID for every single citizen by stealth, using the name of the children and protecting the children as the excuse.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

18,378 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce