Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BREAKING: Putin implies that Russia suspects that Ukraine could have ordered the Moscow attack. He said the attack is “a link in a series of attempts by those who have been fighting Russia since 2014 at the hands of the neo-Nazi Kiev regime.” He also stated it will be... show more

Visegrád 24

2,012,190 subscribers

1,297,820 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

Lost2 years ago

Putin just making up nonsense as he goes. Failing in Ukraine. Now he's failing to keep Russians safe within their own borders. The dictator must be replaced.

Mor Hogeg2 years ago

Waiting for a two-state-solution between Russia and ISIS. #MoscowAttack

Olga Nesterova2 years ago

Interested “who ordered the massacre?” Someone pass on a mirror to the guy

Brian 🏴‍☠️🦍💯2 years ago

He lies and lies and lies….anything to keep Russians from hanging him

|HãŸ WhŸ 🦁2 years ago

Trying to put the blame on Ukraine 🇺🇦 smh

DavidEng 🇺🇸2 years ago

Putin always accuses others of what he is doing. Putin is the modern day Hitler.

SHIBKIND 🔥2 years ago

You know very good who ordered it,don't you?What do you see when you look to mirror?Yes that's the guy who ordered massacre to blame Ukraine and announce mobilization!!!

WORLD AT WAR2 years ago

It is a big failure for Russia that they were not able to prevent the attack and then they look for scapegoats! It also favors Putin in blaming Ukraine. He can thereby increase his mobilization against Ukraine! 🇺🇦

(ساخر) محمود عباس מחמוד עבאס2 years ago

He is absolutely not wrong there. Ukraine in coordination with Israel and the USA

Related Videos

🚨BREAKING "Russia won't leave." Elon Musk stated that simply demanding that Moscow end the war in Ukraine is pointless. He believes that concessions to Russia are necessary to end the fighting and prevent it from continuing for several more years.🇷🇺

🚨BREAKING "Russia won't leave." Elon Musk stated that simply demanding that Moscow end the war in Ukraine is pointless. He believes that concessions to Russia are necessary to end the fighting and prevent it from continuing for several more years.🇷🇺

Aleksey The Great 🇷🇺🎖

62,014 views • 17 days ago

Dmitry Peskov, Putin's press secretary, claimed that the price of oil is irrelevant to the continuation of Russia's aggression against Ukraine. He stated that the only factors that matter are Russia's so-called "security" (despite no one threatening it) and the "protection" of Russians in Ukraine (who have been killed in enormous numbers by Russia itself). He added that Putin is open to contact with Trump, and Moscow is awaiting signals.

Dmitry Peskov, Putin's press secretary, claimed that the price of oil is irrelevant to the continuation of Russia's aggression against Ukraine. He stated that the only factors that matter are Russia's so-called "security" (despite no one threatening it) and the "protection" of Russians in Ukraine (who have been killed in enormous numbers by Russia itself). He added that Putin is open to contact with Trump, and Moscow is awaiting signals.

WarTranslated

187,128 views • 1 year ago

Putin once again stated that Russia does not intend to attack Europe. Well, before launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, he said the same thing. He added that if Europe were to start a war, a situation could quickly arise in which Russia would have no one to negotiate with. The video has subtitles.

Putin once again stated that Russia does not intend to attack Europe. Well, before launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, he said the same thing. He added that if Europe were to start a war, a situation could quickly arise in which Russia would have no one to negotiate with. The video has subtitles.

WarTranslated

56,231 views • 8 months ago

Putin was stunned by an uncomfortable question. It seems the dictator has forgotten how to answer them An Indian journalist caught Putin off guard with a question about Russian-speaking Ukrainians. Geeta Mohan asked the Russian leader what he could say to those Russian-speaking residents of Ukraine who, at the start of the invasion, were asking: “Why is Putin doing this to us?” Many of them spoke Russian, did not consider Russia an enemy, and never expected Russians to start destroying their homes. Putin was clearly confused and interrupted her: “I didn’t understand the question — shocked by what?” Mohan clarified that people were shocked that it was Russia that destroyed their homes. After a pause, Putin delivered a standard set of propaganda talking points: 📌 that these people supposedly lived in areas controlled by Kyiv, which the “Kyiv regime” was “destroying”; 📌 that Moscow was “forced” to launch the operation and “support” the occupation administrations; 📌 that “everyone could have left” if they didn’t want to “be with Russia”; 📌 and that the “referendums” were allegedly “open”. He never answered the main question — why Russia struck those it claimed it intended to protect.

Putin was stunned by an uncomfortable question. It seems the dictator has forgotten how to answer them An Indian journalist caught Putin off guard with a question about Russian-speaking Ukrainians. Geeta Mohan asked the Russian leader what he could say to those Russian-speaking residents of Ukraine who, at the start of the invasion, were asking: “Why is Putin doing this to us?” Many of them spoke Russian, did not consider Russia an enemy, and never expected Russians to start destroying their homes. Putin was clearly confused and interrupted her: “I didn’t understand the question — shocked by what?” Mohan clarified that people were shocked that it was Russia that destroyed their homes. After a pause, Putin delivered a standard set of propaganda talking points: 📌 that these people supposedly lived in areas controlled by Kyiv, which the “Kyiv regime” was “destroying”; 📌 that Moscow was “forced” to launch the operation and “support” the occupation administrations; 📌 that “everyone could have left” if they didn’t want to “be with Russia”; 📌 and that the “referendums” were allegedly “open”. He never answered the main question — why Russia struck those it claimed it intended to protect.

NEXTA

548,620 views • 8 months ago

President Lula explains to Macron who is to blame for the escalation of the war in Ukraine. 'I am worried now because last week there was an attack by Ukraine on some airfield, I don't know exactly where. And I see that Trump wrote in the 'X' that he spoke to Putin and their conversation was bad. And that Putin said that he will avenge the attack on Ukraine.'

President Lula explains to Macron who is to blame for the escalation of the war in Ukraine. 'I am worried now because last week there was an attack by Ukraine on some airfield, I don't know exactly where. And I see that Trump wrote in the 'X' that he spoke to Putin and their conversation was bad. And that Putin said that he will avenge the attack on Ukraine.'

Zlatti71

54,307 views • 1 year ago

🚨BREAKING: UKRAINE ATTACKS KEY RUSSIAN BRIDGE AND CLAIMS RESPONSIBILITY | U.S INVOLVEMENT? The longest bridge in Europe, a major strategic asset for Russia connecting them to Crimea, was attacked early in the morning, and Ukrainian Intelligence has acknowledged that Ukraine was responsible for the attack. In 2016, Putin celebrated the opening of the bridge by calling it “a miracle”. Ukraine attacked the Kerch Bridge overnight using unmanned drones on the water surface. UKRAINE PUBLICLY TAKES RESPONSIBILITY: The Ukrainian admission of the attack is surprising, as it could result in a brutal retaliation by Russia. Putin called the attack on the bridge "an act of terror" by Kyiv. In the past, when Russia has referred to any attack as 'terrorism', it has been indicative of a strong response including mass rocket and missile attacks. US & BRITISH INVOLVEMENT? The Russians also claimed that the attack involved the "direct participation" of American and British intelligence and politicians. The aircraft tracking website FlightRadar appeared to show a U.S reconnaissance aircraft in Black Sea waters around the time of the attack. In a video, Donetsk People's Republic advisor Yan Gagin stated “this happened with the help of fire ships. These are boat drones. Most likely produced in NATO countries ...During the attack a US reconnaissance drone was in the sky over the Black Sea, most likely guiding the drones" GRAIN DEAL ENDED: GLOBAL INFLATION AND FAMINE The Black Sea grain deal is an agreement between Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, and the United Nations to allow the safe export of grain from Ukraine. The deal was brokered in July 2022, after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine blocked the export of grain from Ukraine’s Black Sea ports. The deal allows for the export of grain from three Ukrainian ports: Odesa, Chornomorsk, and Yuzhny. The deal had been credited with helping to reduce global food prices, which have been rising since the start of the war in Ukraine. After the attack, the Russians announced it will be TERMINATED with no indication if there will be talks to renew it. The impact of losing the grain deal will be significant, as it will lead to higher food prices, food shortages, and even famine in some parts of the world. MY THOUGHTS: This is serious for 4 reasons: 1. The attack was in Crimea, a RED LINE for Putin 2. Ukraine publicly claimed responsibility, very rare 3. The U.S could be directly involved 4. Sweden about to join NATO It is well known that the US and the UK have been actively providing intelligence that allows the Ukrainians to conduct attacks on the frontlines. At the same time, it is no secret that Putin made it clear that attacking Crimea or attempting to retake it are a RED LINE that should not be crossed. And Ukraine promptly admitting they are behind the attack demonstrates yet another escalatory step and confidence from Kiev. I’m not saying Ukraine doesn’t have the right to attack Crimea. I understand that Russia invaded Ukrainian territory and illegally annexed Crimea, something I would never condone. But remember, Putin is getting INCREASINGLY CORNERED by NATO and likely fuming after Sweden got the green light to join NATO. He also clearly stated Crimea is a RED LINE for him and that Russia would "never give up" Crimea. Because of these reasons, I think Ukraine and NATO should seriously consider some compromise to avoid this war spilling into a global nuclear conflict. I have called for URGENT DE-ESCALATION for months, by BOTH SIDES, but things seem to only be getting worse. Just yesterday Putin said Russia has ‘sufficient’ cluster munitions and may retaliate if Ukraine uses them, only days after Ukraine received a delivery cluster munitions from the U.S. WHY IS THE WORLD OK WITH THIS?? HOW DO YOU EXPECT PUTIN WILL RESPOND NOW?

🚨BREAKING: UKRAINE ATTACKS KEY RUSSIAN BRIDGE AND CLAIMS RESPONSIBILITY | U.S INVOLVEMENT? The longest bridge in Europe, a major strategic asset for Russia connecting them to Crimea, was attacked early in the morning, and Ukrainian Intelligence has acknowledged that Ukraine was responsible for the attack. In 2016, Putin celebrated the opening of the bridge by calling it “a miracle”. Ukraine attacked the Kerch Bridge overnight using unmanned drones on the water surface. UKRAINE PUBLICLY TAKES RESPONSIBILITY: The Ukrainian admission of the attack is surprising, as it could result in a brutal retaliation by Russia. Putin called the attack on the bridge "an act of terror" by Kyiv. In the past, when Russia has referred to any attack as 'terrorism', it has been indicative of a strong response including mass rocket and missile attacks. US & BRITISH INVOLVEMENT? The Russians also claimed that the attack involved the "direct participation" of American and British intelligence and politicians. The aircraft tracking website FlightRadar appeared to show a U.S reconnaissance aircraft in Black Sea waters around the time of the attack. In a video, Donetsk People's Republic advisor Yan Gagin stated “this happened with the help of fire ships. These are boat drones. Most likely produced in NATO countries ...During the attack a US reconnaissance drone was in the sky over the Black Sea, most likely guiding the drones" GRAIN DEAL ENDED: GLOBAL INFLATION AND FAMINE The Black Sea grain deal is an agreement between Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, and the United Nations to allow the safe export of grain from Ukraine. The deal was brokered in July 2022, after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine blocked the export of grain from Ukraine’s Black Sea ports. The deal allows for the export of grain from three Ukrainian ports: Odesa, Chornomorsk, and Yuzhny. The deal had been credited with helping to reduce global food prices, which have been rising since the start of the war in Ukraine. After the attack, the Russians announced it will be TERMINATED with no indication if there will be talks to renew it. The impact of losing the grain deal will be significant, as it will lead to higher food prices, food shortages, and even famine in some parts of the world. MY THOUGHTS: This is serious for 4 reasons: 1. The attack was in Crimea, a RED LINE for Putin 2. Ukraine publicly claimed responsibility, very rare 3. The U.S could be directly involved 4. Sweden about to join NATO It is well known that the US and the UK have been actively providing intelligence that allows the Ukrainians to conduct attacks on the frontlines. At the same time, it is no secret that Putin made it clear that attacking Crimea or attempting to retake it are a RED LINE that should not be crossed. And Ukraine promptly admitting they are behind the attack demonstrates yet another escalatory step and confidence from Kiev. I’m not saying Ukraine doesn’t have the right to attack Crimea. I understand that Russia invaded Ukrainian territory and illegally annexed Crimea, something I would never condone. But remember, Putin is getting INCREASINGLY CORNERED by NATO and likely fuming after Sweden got the green light to join NATO. He also clearly stated Crimea is a RED LINE for him and that Russia would "never give up" Crimea. Because of these reasons, I think Ukraine and NATO should seriously consider some compromise to avoid this war spilling into a global nuclear conflict. I have called for URGENT DE-ESCALATION for months, by BOTH SIDES, but things seem to only be getting worse. Just yesterday Putin said Russia has ‘sufficient’ cluster munitions and may retaliate if Ukraine uses them, only days after Ukraine received a delivery cluster munitions from the U.S. WHY IS THE WORLD OK WITH THIS?? HOW DO YOU EXPECT PUTIN WILL RESPOND NOW?

Mario Nawfal

2,442,001 views • 3 years ago

President Putin: In the western part of Ukraine, there are lands that Stalin gifted to Ukraine after WW2. Yes, it was Stalin who gifted those lands to Ukraine. But he gifted them within the framework of a single state. Apparently, it never occurred to him that a situation like today's could arise. By the way, I am sure that sooner or later, Ukraine will lose these western lands. What belonged to Poland, Hungary, and Romania will eventually, historically, return to its place. There was only one guarantor of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and that was Russia. But they found it necessary, possible, and beneficial for themselves to declare Russia their enemy

President Putin: In the western part of Ukraine, there are lands that Stalin gifted to Ukraine after WW2. Yes, it was Stalin who gifted those lands to Ukraine. But he gifted them within the framework of a single state. Apparently, it never occurred to him that a situation like today's could arise. By the way, I am sure that sooner or later, Ukraine will lose these western lands. What belonged to Poland, Hungary, and Romania will eventually, historically, return to its place. There was only one guarantor of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and that was Russia. But they found it necessary, possible, and beneficial for themselves to declare Russia their enemy

Open Source Intel

261,146 views • 15 days ago

At the SCO summit, Putin claimed that “Russia did not attack Ukraine.” According to his version, the “Ukrainian crisis” is supposedly the result of a “coup provoked by the West.” He also said that the war allegedly began “because of attempts to suppress Ukraine’s dissenting regions by force.” Putin: “The war happened because NATO wanted to drag Ukraine in.” Okay, NATO, can you DRAG us faster already? We’re tired of waiting.

At the SCO summit, Putin claimed that “Russia did not attack Ukraine.” According to his version, the “Ukrainian crisis” is supposedly the result of a “coup provoked by the West.” He also said that the war allegedly began “because of attempts to suppress Ukraine’s dissenting regions by force.” Putin: “The war happened because NATO wanted to drag Ukraine in.” Okay, NATO, can you DRAG us faster already? We’re tired of waiting.

Maria Drutska 🇺🇦

49,669 views • 11 months ago

Putin said that Ukraine intends to use nuclear weapons against Russia. "By the way, the enemy is not shying away from any other means. Reports have already appeared in the media about their attempts, or intentions, to use some kind of nuclear component," he said. PM Starmer already said there is no ground behind these statements (obviously). This could be Russia's plan for raising the stakes of nuclear blackmail Putin also stated that there is information about possible attempts to sabotage the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea. Usually, when Russia announces sabotage suspicions, it means that Russia is planning false flag operations of this kind.

Putin said that Ukraine intends to use nuclear weapons against Russia. "By the way, the enemy is not shying away from any other means. Reports have already appeared in the media about their attempts, or intentions, to use some kind of nuclear component," he said. PM Starmer already said there is no ground behind these statements (obviously). This could be Russia's plan for raising the stakes of nuclear blackmail Putin also stated that there is information about possible attempts to sabotage the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea. Usually, when Russia announces sabotage suspicions, it means that Russia is planning false flag operations of this kind.

Anton Gerashchenko

160,502 views • 5 months ago

A journalist from India Today said that even Russian-speaking Ukrainians in eastern Ukraine were shocked by the actions of the Russians, to which Putin said that he "gave them the opportunity to express their will in a referendum," and those who didn’t want to, he claimed, "were free to leave." (So it's their own fault that Russia is destroying them, according to war criminal Putin?)

A journalist from India Today said that even Russian-speaking Ukrainians in eastern Ukraine were shocked by the actions of the Russians, to which Putin said that he "gave them the opportunity to express their will in a referendum," and those who didn’t want to, he claimed, "were free to leave." (So it's their own fault that Russia is destroying them, according to war criminal Putin?)

Anton Gerashchenko

67,785 views • 8 months ago

On April 12th 2014, the Russian GRU agent Igor Girkin and 60 other heavily armed men crossed into Ukraine from Russia and took control of the city of Sloviansk, starting the War in the Donbas. The former “People's Governor of Donbas” who was in charge of the “separatist forces” Pavel Gubarev has now admitted that their “uprising” was fully controlled by Russia and would have been crushed by the Ukrainian Army had Russian regular forces crossed into Ukraine in August 2014. The Russian Army has been fighting against Ukraine in the Donbas since 2014. It was all planned, coordinated and funded by Russia. Once the Russians realized that the “separatists” were about to be defeated, Moscow sent in the Russian Army in August 2014. Russia is the aggressor. Russia started the war in the Donbas. Video via Anton Gerashchenko

On April 12th 2014, the Russian GRU agent Igor Girkin and 60 other heavily armed men crossed into Ukraine from Russia and took control of the city of Sloviansk, starting the War in the Donbas. The former “People's Governor of Donbas” who was in charge of the “separatist forces” Pavel Gubarev has now admitted that their “uprising” was fully controlled by Russia and would have been crushed by the Ukrainian Army had Russian regular forces crossed into Ukraine in August 2014. The Russian Army has been fighting against Ukraine in the Donbas since 2014. It was all planned, coordinated and funded by Russia. Once the Russians realized that the “separatists” were about to be defeated, Moscow sent in the Russian Army in August 2014. Russia is the aggressor. Russia started the war in the Donbas. Video via Anton Gerashchenko

Visegrád 24

40,860 views • 3 months ago

🕯 Dissident on Why Ukraine Is a Painful Question for Russia Dissident (a political prisoner of Soviet regime concentration camps) Opanas Zalyvakha: “The question of Ukraine is painful for Russia, because without Ukraine, Russia loses 90% of the history that Russians have appropriated for themselves. They need to start thinking in a new way… ”

🕯 Dissident on Why Ukraine Is a Painful Question for Russia Dissident (a political prisoner of Soviet regime concentration camps) Opanas Zalyvakha: “The question of Ukraine is painful for Russia, because without Ukraine, Russia loses 90% of the history that Russians have appropriated for themselves. They need to start thinking in a new way… ”

Devana 🇺🇦

34,475 views • 7 months ago

🚨INTERVIEW: “NO NATO COUNTRY IS GOING TO ATTACK RUSSIA - ON THE CONTRARY, RUSSIA WILL” "The first attack on Ukraine in 2022, and then Russia’s failures that same year to achieve their goals, created an opening for Finland and then Sweden to join NATO. Once Finland joined NATO, the length of the border between Russia and NATO countries doubled. NATO effectively moved to the outskirts of Putin’s native city of Saint Petersburg. So, if Russia were truly concerned about a NATO attack, it would be reasonable to expect that at least half of the army fighting in Ukraine would have been moved to Saint Petersburg to protect northern Russia from a possible NATO offensive. On the contrary, troops that were near Saint Petersburg were moved to Ukraine. And there is a conviction that no NATO country is going to attack Russia. On the contrary, it is Russia that is attacking a future NATO country." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

🚨INTERVIEW: “NO NATO COUNTRY IS GOING TO ATTACK RUSSIA - ON THE CONTRARY, RUSSIA WILL” "The first attack on Ukraine in 2022, and then Russia’s failures that same year to achieve their goals, created an opening for Finland and then Sweden to join NATO. Once Finland joined NATO, the length of the border between Russia and NATO countries doubled. NATO effectively moved to the outskirts of Putin’s native city of Saint Petersburg. So, if Russia were truly concerned about a NATO attack, it would be reasonable to expect that at least half of the army fighting in Ukraine would have been moved to Saint Petersburg to protect northern Russia from a possible NATO offensive. On the contrary, troops that were near Saint Petersburg were moved to Ukraine. And there is a conviction that no NATO country is going to attack Russia. On the contrary, it is Russia that is attacking a future NATO country." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

42,126 views • 8 months ago

🇷🇺 A Former Russian Vice Prime Minister on Russia’s Inevitable End Former Russian Vice Prime Minister Poltoranin says that death for Russia will come in any case. He believes that Putin will definitely not win this “special operation”. This will lead to the death of Russia. And even if Putin were to win, that would also provoke the death of Russia. Fascism would begin in Russia. But it is beneficial for Russians for Ukraine to win. He also says that Russia needed to invent a reason to attack Ukraine, which is why they fabricate various lies about nationalists — and Russians swallow this lies without any problem, while the main enemy of the Russian people is Putin himself.

🇷🇺 A Former Russian Vice Prime Minister on Russia’s Inevitable End Former Russian Vice Prime Minister Poltoranin says that death for Russia will come in any case. He believes that Putin will definitely not win this “special operation”. This will lead to the death of Russia. And even if Putin were to win, that would also provoke the death of Russia. Fascism would begin in Russia. But it is beneficial for Russians for Ukraine to win. He also says that Russia needed to invent a reason to attack Ukraine, which is why they fabricate various lies about nationalists — and Russians swallow this lies without any problem, while the main enemy of the Russian people is Putin himself.

Devana 🇺🇦

126,505 views • 7 months ago

Putin said that it wasn't Russia that started and wages the war in Ukraine. Russia, according to Putin, has been trying to stop the war during all this time. Such incredible lies. What Putin says is directed primarily at millions of fooled Russians who believe him and do not use other sources of information. Putin said: "By the way, we don't have unfriendly countries, we have unfriendly elites in some countries...the propaganda is working there, of course, they brainwash and say that it was us who started the war, and forget that it was them who started the war in 2014... that's when the war started, and we're doing all we can to stop it." (Sorry, I was too tired for subtitles)

Putin said that it wasn't Russia that started and wages the war in Ukraine. Russia, according to Putin, has been trying to stop the war during all this time. Such incredible lies. What Putin says is directed primarily at millions of fooled Russians who believe him and do not use other sources of information. Putin said: "By the way, we don't have unfriendly countries, we have unfriendly elites in some countries...the propaganda is working there, of course, they brainwash and say that it was us who started the war, and forget that it was them who started the war in 2014... that's when the war started, and we're doing all we can to stop it." (Sorry, I was too tired for subtitles)

Anton Gerashchenko

190,576 views • 11 months ago