正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

#BREAKING:🔥Rampell: “…but the bigger problem is that this is Trump’s modus operandi. He uses emergencies all the time as an EXCUSE for every imaginable violation of laws and norms. He wanted to deport people with no due process so he declared an immigration emergency. He wanted to tariff everything...

27,364 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

These are the facts. Yesterday, he explicitly stated that declaring a state of emergency doesn’t remove the governor. Today, he’s claiming that the president is in a precarious situation. Watch the entire video until the end. He said expressly no be can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor but Pres.Tinubu did, so why can’t he say Expressly President Tinubu was wrong. He stated boldly no body can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor he said if anyone tried it they will fail. So when Tinubu tried it 2 hours why didn’t he say Tinubu is operating an illegal law! He then said the president was pushed to declare state of emergency? Based on his argument yesterday why didn’t he say the president has no powers to declare state of emergency and suspend the governor He then pushes the argument to the National Assembly to decide which is a grand pivot mechanism. I have been in this business for 20 years so I know a pivot. The same 1961 law that he claimed didn’t exist ( he called it an antiquated law/ an illegal law)yesterday is now the same law he claims some lawyers informed him is still active. Before I intervened today, I watched the video multiple times and noticed that the speaker had pivoted. If he adheres to the constitution he quoted the previous day, why can’t he explicitly condemn President Tinubu in the same manner as he condemned Obasanjo in his previous intervention? It’s evident that he’s playing a strategic game. All the other things he said were to prolong the situation and ultimately support President Tinubu while citing the opinions of some lawyers, the same law he discarded the previous day. I’ve shared the entire video for accountability. We’re also aware of other events that transpired yesterday.

oseni rufai

41,098 次观看 • 1 年前

🇺🇸🚨Alastair Crooke: The Supreme Court striking down Trump’s tariffs would spark MAJOR CRISIS with geopolitical consequences ‘The Constitution says that the revenue raising in the United States is a prerogative of Congress, not of the President. The President contends he has the right to set tariffs on whom he wants, when he wants, as he wants, for as long as he wants under the one provision which is the act of declaring an emergency. But the Emergency Act says nothing about tariffs. It just says that in the case of an emergency, special measures are permitted. So what the Supreme Court will do, it could even order the repayment of all those tariffs, which are about $90 billion, that had been raised mostly from Americans. It would be a major crisis. The legal experts, many of them think that there’s a good chance that the court will side against the President on tariffs and return the authority to Congress. Imagine then the geopolitical consequences to this, because the whole of his geopolitical structure framework has been based on tariffs and using tariffs as a sort of weaponised, forcing agent to get more money, to shake down states in Southeast Asia or in Gulf states or anywhere he can, to modify the deficit a little.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, joins us for Saturday’s episode of Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

25,179 次观看 • 8 个月前