Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 BREAKING: Scientists just learned how to control magnetism at the atomic level. Not materials. Not circuits. Individual spin patterns. Read that again. Instead of using electric charge… they’re using the spin of electrons to store and process data. And it gets crazier: They can create tiny magnetic whirlpools...

CharlesMullins2's profile picture

TheNewPhysics

55,966 subscribers

672,799 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING: Scientists just created a non-toxic, low-cost conductive polymer This could unlock a new era of biocompatible electronics Think about it • Circuits that move like skin • Implants the body doesn’t reject • Medical tech that feels alive We’re not just building better devices… We’re starting to merge technology with biology The line between human and machine is about to disappear Follow me I break down the future of physics, tech, and reality itself
0:15

🚨 BREAKING: Scientists just created a non-toxic, low-cost conductive polymer This could unlock a new era of biocompatible electronics Think about it • Circuits that move like skin • Implants the body doesn’t reject • Medical tech that feels alive We’re not just building better devices… We’re starting to merge technology with biology The line between human and machine is about to disappear Follow me I break down the future of physics, tech, and reality itself

TheNewPhysics

283,815 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

At OptimAI Network, we believe the true power of AI Agent comes from the data behind it—and that power shouldn’t rest in the hands of just a few. That’s why we’re building a decentralized ecosystem with you, our community, at its core. Using EVM Layer-2, DePIN, and your collective efforts, we’re creating smarter, faster, and continuously evolving AI agents. Through our DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure) Network, your nodes are the backbone. You provide the computing power, data sourcing, storage, and bandwidth that keep this system resilient, scalable, and truly distributed. It’s not just infrastructure—it’s a movement powered by all of us. Then there’s the DeHIN (Decentralized Human Intelligence), where your insights shine. As a global community, you validate and refine data, ensuring our AI models stay accurate, diverse, and grounded in real-world perspectives. This isn’t about top-down control; it’s about harnessing the intelligence of many to make AI better for everyone. We’re not just dreaming of a decentralized AI future—we’re building it, together. This is your network, your impact, and your chance to redefine what AI can be. Let’s keep pushing forward. Learn more at:
0:14

At OptimAI Network, we believe the true power of AI Agent comes from the data behind it—and that power shouldn’t rest in the hands of just a few. That’s why we’re building a decentralized ecosystem with you, our community, at its core. Using EVM Layer-2, DePIN, and your collective efforts, we’re creating smarter, faster, and continuously evolving AI agents. Through our DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure) Network, your nodes are the backbone. You provide the computing power, data sourcing, storage, and bandwidth that keep this system resilient, scalable, and truly distributed. It’s not just infrastructure—it’s a movement powered by all of us. Then there’s the DeHIN (Decentralized Human Intelligence), where your insights shine. As a global community, you validate and refine data, ensuring our AI models stay accurate, diverse, and grounded in real-world perspectives. This isn’t about top-down control; it’s about harnessing the intelligence of many to make AI better for everyone. We’re not just dreaming of a decentralized AI future—we’re building it, together. This is your network, your impact, and your chance to redefine what AI can be. Let’s keep pushing forward. Learn more at:

OptimAI Network

21,362 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 SCIENTISTS MAY HAVE FOUND A REAL “LOOPHOLE” FOR WARP DRIVES. And for the first time, the math may not completely break physics. For decades, warp drives were considered impossible because they seemed to require massive amounts of “exotic negative energy” that doesn’t exist in usable quantities. But new theoretical models suggest there may be ways to reshape spacetime using far less exotic energy or in some versions, almost none at all. Why this matters: • A warp drive doesn’t actually move the ship faster than light • It compresses spacetime in front of the craft and expands it behind • The ship stays inside a stable bubble while the universe itself moves around it • Einstein’s speed limit remains intact the ship never locally exceeds c The deeper implication is mind-bending: If spacetime can be engineered like this, distance itself becomes programmable. Interstellar travel would stop being an impossible energy problem… and turn into a geometry problem. The universe may not be blocking faster-than-light travel. We may simply be too primitive to shape spacetime correctly yet. What happens when humanity learns to engineer gravity itself? Follow for more frontier physics and reality-bending breakthroughs.
0:16

🚨 SCIENTISTS MAY HAVE FOUND A REAL “LOOPHOLE” FOR WARP DRIVES. And for the first time, the math may not completely break physics. For decades, warp drives were considered impossible because they seemed to require massive amounts of “exotic negative energy” that doesn’t exist in usable quantities. But new theoretical models suggest there may be ways to reshape spacetime using far less exotic energy or in some versions, almost none at all. Why this matters: • A warp drive doesn’t actually move the ship faster than light • It compresses spacetime in front of the craft and expands it behind • The ship stays inside a stable bubble while the universe itself moves around it • Einstein’s speed limit remains intact the ship never locally exceeds c The deeper implication is mind-bending: If spacetime can be engineered like this, distance itself becomes programmable. Interstellar travel would stop being an impossible energy problem… and turn into a geometry problem. The universe may not be blocking faster-than-light travel. We may simply be too primitive to shape spacetime correctly yet. What happens when humanity learns to engineer gravity itself? Follow for more frontier physics and reality-bending breakthroughs.

TheNewPhysics

89,623 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 WTF. Ketanji Brown Jackson at the Supreme Court of the United States just said: “We are now looking at the definition of a girl and we’re saying only people who were girl assigned at birth qualify.” Read that again. Slowly. This is the level of confusion sitting on the highest court in the country. Basic reality reduced to ideological word games. Common sense thrown out the window so activists can feel validated. How do ANY of them take this seriously. This is what happens when DEI replaces merit. This is what happens when ideology replaces biology. This is what happens when feelings override facts. The court is supposed to interpret the Constitution. Not rewrite reality. DEI is not a buzzword. It is a massive problem.
0:19

🚨 WTF. Ketanji Brown Jackson at the Supreme Court of the United States just said: “We are now looking at the definition of a girl and we’re saying only people who were girl assigned at birth qualify.” Read that again. Slowly. This is the level of confusion sitting on the highest court in the country. Basic reality reduced to ideological word games. Common sense thrown out the window so activists can feel validated. How do ANY of them take this seriously. This is what happens when DEI replaces merit. This is what happens when ideology replaces biology. This is what happens when feelings override facts. The court is supposed to interpret the Constitution. Not rewrite reality. DEI is not a buzzword. It is a massive problem.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

483,234 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 The Media’s Favorite Trick 🚨 Let’s call it what it is: There’s no real news anymore — just opinion dressed up as journalism. But the most dangerous part? It’s not just the spin. It’s the silence. 🛑 When they choose what to report and what to bury… 🛑 When they ignore massive stories that don’t fit the narrative… That’s not journalism — that’s manipulation. This kind of “reporting” isn’t just misleading — it’s lying by omission. And it’s fueling division, confusion, and chaos in our country. 🚨 Our government and our press are long overdue for a truth detox. Because without honesty, there’s no trust. And without trust, there’s no democracy. 📣 Enough is enough. #LiesByOmission #MediaCorruption #TruthMatters #RealNewsNow #WeSeeThroughIt
0:18

🚨 The Media’s Favorite Trick 🚨 Let’s call it what it is: There’s no real news anymore — just opinion dressed up as journalism. But the most dangerous part? It’s not just the spin. It’s the silence. 🛑 When they choose what to report and what to bury… 🛑 When they ignore massive stories that don’t fit the narrative… That’s not journalism — that’s manipulation. This kind of “reporting” isn’t just misleading — it’s lying by omission. And it’s fueling division, confusion, and chaos in our country. 🚨 Our government and our press are long overdue for a truth detox. Because without honesty, there’s no trust. And without trust, there’s no democracy. 📣 Enough is enough. #LiesByOmission #MediaCorruption #TruthMatters #RealNewsNow #WeSeeThroughIt

Project Constitution

12,676 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The difference between SEALSQ silicon-based spin-qubit QPUs and quantum processors built on superconducting circuits or trapped ions comes down to physics, manufacturability, and long-term industrial scalability. SEALSQ’s approach uses electron spins confined in silicon semiconductor structures—essentially quantum dots fabricated with CMOS-compatible processes—where the qubit is the spin state of an electron rather than a macroscopic electrical current or a free ion. This makes spin qubits orders of magnitude smaller, potentially allowing millions of qubits on a single silicon wafer, and critically aligns the technology with existing semiconductor fabs, supply chains, and design tools. In contrast, superconducting qubits rely on exotic materials and microwave resonators that are physically large, wiring-heavy, and difficult to scale beyond a few thousand qubits without massive cryogenic and control overhead. Trapped-ion systems achieve excellent qubit coherence but depend on ultra-high vacuum chambers, precision lasers, and optical alignment, making them closer to scientific instruments than manufacturable chips. Silicon spin qubits also benefit from long intrinsic coherence times (especially in isotopically purified silicon), low power dissipation, and a natural path to tight integration with classical control, cryogenic electronics, and security primitives—an area where SEALSQ’s semiconductor and hardware-security DNA becomes a strategic advantage. The trade-off is that spin qubits are technically harder to control at the single-qubit level and are earlier in large-scale deployment than superconducting systems, but if solved, they offer the most credible route to industrial-scale, cost-effective, secure quantum processors, rather than lab-scale demonstrations.
0:18

The difference between SEALSQ silicon-based spin-qubit QPUs and quantum processors built on superconducting circuits or trapped ions comes down to physics, manufacturability, and long-term industrial scalability. SEALSQ’s approach uses electron spins confined in silicon semiconductor structures—essentially quantum dots fabricated with CMOS-compatible processes—where the qubit is the spin state of an electron rather than a macroscopic electrical current or a free ion. This makes spin qubits orders of magnitude smaller, potentially allowing millions of qubits on a single silicon wafer, and critically aligns the technology with existing semiconductor fabs, supply chains, and design tools. In contrast, superconducting qubits rely on exotic materials and microwave resonators that are physically large, wiring-heavy, and difficult to scale beyond a few thousand qubits without massive cryogenic and control overhead. Trapped-ion systems achieve excellent qubit coherence but depend on ultra-high vacuum chambers, precision lasers, and optical alignment, making them closer to scientific instruments than manufacturable chips. Silicon spin qubits also benefit from long intrinsic coherence times (especially in isotopically purified silicon), low power dissipation, and a natural path to tight integration with classical control, cryogenic electronics, and security primitives—an area where SEALSQ’s semiconductor and hardware-security DNA becomes a strategic advantage. The trade-off is that spin qubits are technically harder to control at the single-qubit level and are earlier in large-scale deployment than superconducting systems, but if solved, they offer the most credible route to industrial-scale, cost-effective, secure quantum processors, rather than lab-scale demonstrations.

Carlos Creus Moreira

19,616 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Dawn of a New Era on $SUI (9) Still in the festive spirit, let’s look at Tusky , Tusky is a storage service that's not controlled by one company. It uses something called WalrusProtocol to keep your data safe. Your data is encrypted from start to finish, so only you can see it. Instead of one place, your data goes to many different spots. This setup makes your data less likely to be lost or stolen. It helps keep your information safe and always available. Tusky gives you control over your files. You can easily manage them with the tools provided. You decide who gets to see your data. This makes it great for personal storage or working with others. It works with SuiNetwork for even more privacy. You can log in without sharing personal info, keeping everything more secure. This means only you can get to your data, with no third party involved. It is growing fast, with 100,000 uploads already. This indicates its increasing acceptance in the tech community focused on data sovereignty. It's good at managing lots of data safely. In tech, where you want to own your data, TuskyTools is popular. It gives users control over their information. This platform helps keep your data secure and gives you freedom.
0:11

The Dawn of a New Era on $SUI (9) Still in the festive spirit, let’s look at Tusky , Tusky is a storage service that's not controlled by one company. It uses something called WalrusProtocol to keep your data safe. Your data is encrypted from start to finish, so only you can see it. Instead of one place, your data goes to many different spots. This setup makes your data less likely to be lost or stolen. It helps keep your information safe and always available. Tusky gives you control over your files. You can easily manage them with the tools provided. You decide who gets to see your data. This makes it great for personal storage or working with others. It works with SuiNetwork for even more privacy. You can log in without sharing personal info, keeping everything more secure. This means only you can get to your data, with no third party involved. It is growing fast, with 100,000 uploads already. This indicates its increasing acceptance in the tech community focused on data sovereignty. It's good at managing lots of data safely. In tech, where you want to own your data, TuskyTools is popular. It gives users control over their information. This platform helps keep your data secure and gives you freedom.

Kaboom.sui🐽 🌊,⛵

18,167 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There’s a reason the LimeWire name still hits people instantly. If you were around in the early internet days, LimeWire was everywhere. Music discovery, file sharing, chaos, excitement. It shaped how a whole generation interacted with the web. That kind of brand memory doesn’t fade and LimeWire is proving it can be reused in a serious way. What’s different now is the foundation. LimeWire Network is the decentralized storage layer of LimeWire, built on BNB Chain. It is not a nostalgia project. It is infrastructure. Storage, transfers, and usage are happening on chain, designed to scale for real applications rather than demos. The growth backs that up. Looking at recent data on lmwrscan, LimeWire Network has already moved into tens of terabytes of stored data, with tens of thousands of uploads and consistent daily activity. Network usage keeps climbing, not spiking once and disappearing. That kind of curve usually shows real users, not incentive farming. And the economics are clear. The $LMWR token sits at the center of the system. Users pay in LMWR to use storage. Node operators earn LMWR for providing resources. Rewards and payments stay inside the ecosystem instead of leaking out to third parties. That loop matters. Most decentralized storage networks struggle because nobody knows they exist. LimeWire doesn’t have that problem. The brand alone opens doors, pulls attention, and lowers the friction for new users to try the product. When you combine that with live usage data and a functioning token economy, the upside starts to look asymmetric. Built on BNB Chain, LimeWire Network also gets the scalability needed if adoption keeps accelerating. That choice signals intent to grow, not just experiment. This feels like a rare case where nostalgia is not the product, it is the distribution layer. Curious how you see it. Are you watching LimeWire because of the brand comeback, the LimeWire Network growth, or the role of the LMWR token in the long run?
0:15

There’s a reason the LimeWire name still hits people instantly. If you were around in the early internet days, LimeWire was everywhere. Music discovery, file sharing, chaos, excitement. It shaped how a whole generation interacted with the web. That kind of brand memory doesn’t fade and LimeWire is proving it can be reused in a serious way. What’s different now is the foundation. LimeWire Network is the decentralized storage layer of LimeWire, built on BNB Chain. It is not a nostalgia project. It is infrastructure. Storage, transfers, and usage are happening on chain, designed to scale for real applications rather than demos. The growth backs that up. Looking at recent data on lmwrscan, LimeWire Network has already moved into tens of terabytes of stored data, with tens of thousands of uploads and consistent daily activity. Network usage keeps climbing, not spiking once and disappearing. That kind of curve usually shows real users, not incentive farming. And the economics are clear. The $LMWR token sits at the center of the system. Users pay in LMWR to use storage. Node operators earn LMWR for providing resources. Rewards and payments stay inside the ecosystem instead of leaking out to third parties. That loop matters. Most decentralized storage networks struggle because nobody knows they exist. LimeWire doesn’t have that problem. The brand alone opens doors, pulls attention, and lowers the friction for new users to try the product. When you combine that with live usage data and a functioning token economy, the upside starts to look asymmetric. Built on BNB Chain, LimeWire Network also gets the scalability needed if adoption keeps accelerating. That choice signals intent to grow, not just experiment. This feels like a rare case where nostalgia is not the product, it is the distribution layer. Curious how you see it. Are you watching LimeWire because of the brand comeback, the LimeWire Network growth, or the role of the LMWR token in the long run?

ryu 龙

25,416 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

AI is not accelerating nearly fast enough to cure cancer. That is the problem. And it literally cannot without actually seeing what’s happening inside the cell. There’s this new project claiming their models will “solve” cancer by predicting drug responses at scale. Cool story. Except their entire approach still treats the cell like a black box. They’re optimizing for binding affinity while having zero idea what the drug actually does once it’s inside a real, living cell. Meanwhile we’re over here building the tools to watch the cell in real time. No staining or sequencing. Just direct observation of mechanism. You can simulate all you want. But if you can’t see the actual cellular response, you’re just making very confident guesses about something you’ve never actually looked at. We’ve spent two years proving this. The data is there. The difference is night and day. AI is a tool. It’s not the microscope. If your model can’t tell you why a drug is killing the wrong cells or why resistance is forming in real time… it’s not ready to cure cancer. It’s ready to waste another billion dollars. We’re not competing with AI. We’re giving it eyes. Goodbye.
0:16

AI is not accelerating nearly fast enough to cure cancer. That is the problem. And it literally cannot without actually seeing what’s happening inside the cell. There’s this new project claiming their models will “solve” cancer by predicting drug responses at scale. Cool story. Except their entire approach still treats the cell like a black box. They’re optimizing for binding affinity while having zero idea what the drug actually does once it’s inside a real, living cell. Meanwhile we’re over here building the tools to watch the cell in real time. No staining or sequencing. Just direct observation of mechanism. You can simulate all you want. But if you can’t see the actual cellular response, you’re just making very confident guesses about something you’ve never actually looked at. We’ve spent two years proving this. The data is there. The difference is night and day. AI is a tool. It’s not the microscope. If your model can’t tell you why a drug is killing the wrong cells or why resistance is forming in real time… it’s not ready to cure cancer. It’s ready to waste another billion dollars. We’re not competing with AI. We’re giving it eyes. Goodbye.

Parmita Mishra

47,943 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

I was working through Steam Early Access requirements for VRUnderground and I had a really spooky realization. The whole conversation around training images and videos is not the important part. The media itself is just a bridge. What is actually being extracted is cognitive patterning. Models learn how people think, not just how they draw. The images are only the residue of the process. The real map is of the minds that created them. It reminds me of poker. A great poker player is not "stealing your cards". They are reading the patterns in your behavior and mapping your decision space. In that sense, training AI on human-created data is not about automating tasks. It is about mapping cognition through metadata and behavior trails. If that is true, then the internet starts looking a lot more like a poker table. And nobody wins a hand against someone who can read their mind.
0:13

I was working through Steam Early Access requirements for VRUnderground and I had a really spooky realization. The whole conversation around training images and videos is not the important part. The media itself is just a bridge. What is actually being extracted is cognitive patterning. Models learn how people think, not just how they draw. The images are only the residue of the process. The real map is of the minds that created them. It reminds me of poker. A great poker player is not "stealing your cards". They are reading the patterns in your behavior and mapping your decision space. In that sense, training AI on human-created data is not about automating tasks. It is about mapping cognition through metadata and behavior trails. If that is true, then the internet starts looking a lot more like a poker table. And nobody wins a hand against someone who can read their mind.

VRUnderground

26,437 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The future of footwear may not be manufactured in bulk. It may be fabricated around you. That is what makes this shift so interesting to me. 3D-printed footwear is moving from novelty to a real industrial model, with market forecasts pointing to rapid growth over the next decade. At the same time, brands and manufacturers are using additive manufacturing, digital design, and custom-fit workflows to shorten development cycles and make more personalized products viable. What is new here is not just the printer. It is the system around it: → scan the foot → model the fit digitally → print the part on demand → produce closer to the customer That matters. Because once footwear becomes data-driven and locally fabricated, several things change fast: → fit gets more personal → prototyping gets faster → waste drops because you do not overproduce → inventory pressure falls because you do not need to guess demand the same way To me, that is the bigger signal. This is not just about a better sneaker. It is about a different manufacturing logic. Formlabs notes that 3D printing already enables customized orthotics with better biomechanical precision, lower material waste, and simpler digital workflows. McKinsey has also pointed to digitization and 3D design as a way to shorten design cycles and reduce sampling iterations in apparel and footwear. And once that logic matures, the use cases get much bigger: → custom athletic footwear built from gait and pressure data → hospitals producing orthotics faster and closer to the patient → micro-factories making products on demand instead of stocking shelves → footwear designed for one body, not an average body That is why I think this matters now. The question is no longer whether personalized fabrication is possible. It is whether brands move fast enough before customers start expecting every product to fit like it was made only for them. Would you actually wear a shoe fabricated around your own biometric data? #AI #3DPrinting #Footwear #Manufacturing #Innovation #FutureOfWork #RetailTech #Customization #Technology
0:15

The future of footwear may not be manufactured in bulk. It may be fabricated around you. That is what makes this shift so interesting to me. 3D-printed footwear is moving from novelty to a real industrial model, with market forecasts pointing to rapid growth over the next decade. At the same time, brands and manufacturers are using additive manufacturing, digital design, and custom-fit workflows to shorten development cycles and make more personalized products viable. What is new here is not just the printer. It is the system around it: → scan the foot → model the fit digitally → print the part on demand → produce closer to the customer That matters. Because once footwear becomes data-driven and locally fabricated, several things change fast: → fit gets more personal → prototyping gets faster → waste drops because you do not overproduce → inventory pressure falls because you do not need to guess demand the same way To me, that is the bigger signal. This is not just about a better sneaker. It is about a different manufacturing logic. Formlabs notes that 3D printing already enables customized orthotics with better biomechanical precision, lower material waste, and simpler digital workflows. McKinsey has also pointed to digitization and 3D design as a way to shorten design cycles and reduce sampling iterations in apparel and footwear. And once that logic matures, the use cases get much bigger: → custom athletic footwear built from gait and pressure data → hospitals producing orthotics faster and closer to the patient → micro-factories making products on demand instead of stocking shelves → footwear designed for one body, not an average body That is why I think this matters now. The question is no longer whether personalized fabrication is possible. It is whether brands move fast enough before customers start expecting every product to fit like it was made only for them. Would you actually wear a shoe fabricated around your own biometric data? #AI #3DPrinting #Footwear #Manufacturing #Innovation #FutureOfWork #RetailTech #Customization #Technology

Pascal Bornet

47,443 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

When a nuclear reactor powers on for the first time, the core fills with a deep blue glow that feels almost unreal as it rises through the water in a quiet surge of energy. The light is Cherenkov radiation, created when charged particles move through the water faster than light can travel in that medium, a discovery made in the 1930s that revealed a new way to see high energy reactions. Every appearance of this glow is a reminder of how powerful atomic reactions can be, showing a rare moment where raw physics becomes something visible and strangely beautiful.
0:13

When a nuclear reactor powers on for the first time, the core fills with a deep blue glow that feels almost unreal as it rises through the water in a quiet surge of energy. The light is Cherenkov radiation, created when charged particles move through the water faster than light can travel in that medium, a discovery made in the 1930s that revealed a new way to see high energy reactions. Every appearance of this glow is a reminder of how powerful atomic reactions can be, showing a rare moment where raw physics becomes something visible and strangely beautiful.

Today In History

383,805 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

## Romania is using blockchain to count Presidential electoral votes today. The Permanent Electoral Authority in Romania (ROAP - Romania Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă) is using blockchain technology to count and validate today's (Nov 24) presidential electoral votes. People from all over the world can follow the data in real-time at leveraging the use of a public ledger to offer more transparency and data immutability. The tool is offered in partnership with Romania's Special Telecommunication Service (STS - Serviciul de Telecomunicații Speciale, in Romanian), although it is not clear which infrastructure the country is using. ### Anybody has more information about that? What blockchain are they using? Since when was this implemented? Who else was responsible for implementing it? Really groundbreaking use case, given the usual electoral concerns, which illustrates how deep into the blockchain technology Romania is and some opportunities for blockchain developers surging in the country. --- Sources: - Dr. X 🧬 ( - damian (
0:16

## Romania is using blockchain to count Presidential electoral votes today. The Permanent Electoral Authority in Romania (ROAP - Romania Autoritatea Electorală Permanentă) is using blockchain technology to count and validate today's (Nov 24) presidential electoral votes. People from all over the world can follow the data in real-time at leveraging the use of a public ledger to offer more transparency and data immutability. The tool is offered in partnership with Romania's Special Telecommunication Service (STS - Serviciul de Telecomunicații Speciale, in Romanian), although it is not clear which infrastructure the country is using. ### Anybody has more information about that? What blockchain are they using? Since when was this implemented? Who else was responsible for implementing it? Really groundbreaking use case, given the usual electoral concerns, which illustrates how deep into the blockchain technology Romania is and some opportunities for blockchain developers surging in the country. --- Sources: - Dr. X 🧬 ( - damian (

Vini B |「 thecoding 」

13,963 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This Huawei ad I just walked by at Munich airport hit me like a ton of bricks. Huawei watch? HUAWEI HEALTH? Delivering your intimate, real-time location, behavioral & physiological data (heart rate??) directly to the CCP is absolutely insane. I hadn't even considered how many of these watches must be on people hands right now, and how powerful a tool of espionage (the next-level invasive data gathering!) the CCP has at its disposal. Grok, what countries have the biggest usage per capita of huawei watch? Also, considering what I wrote earlier in this post, and given that Huawei is bound by Chinese law to share all data it has access to with the the Chinese government (and not disclose it is doing so), what impact is there for personal privacy and security for users of Huawei watch?
0:16

This Huawei ad I just walked by at Munich airport hit me like a ton of bricks. Huawei watch? HUAWEI HEALTH? Delivering your intimate, real-time location, behavioral & physiological data (heart rate??) directly to the CCP is absolutely insane. I hadn't even considered how many of these watches must be on people hands right now, and how powerful a tool of espionage (the next-level invasive data gathering!) the CCP has at its disposal. Grok, what countries have the biggest usage per capita of huawei watch? Also, considering what I wrote earlier in this post, and given that Huawei is bound by Chinese law to share all data it has access to with the the Chinese government (and not disclose it is doing so), what impact is there for personal privacy and security for users of Huawei watch?

Jan Jekielek

149,648 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 STARMER’S WAR ON FREE SPEECH: WHY HE WANTS X SILENCED AND BRITAIN CONTROLLED Keir Starmer’s government is rapidly becoming one of the most despised in modern British history — and for good reason. This is not a cabinet that rose on hope. It is a cabinet that rose on fear, censorship, and managed decline. In just a short time, Starmer’s Labour government has managed to alienate almost every pillar of British society: Working people crushed by taxes and energy costs. Farmers facing land grabs and inheritance raids. Veterans watching Britain give up strategic territory. Families struggling while billions are sent abroad. And citizens silenced for daring to speak out. This is not incompetence. It is ideology. Starmer governs as if Britain is an obstacle to be managed, not a nation to be defended. His cabinet speaks the language of global institutions, not the language of the British people. They treat borders as optional, sovereignty as outdated, and free speech as dangerous. And nothing exposes that more clearly than their obsession with shutting down X. They do not fear “misinformation.” They fear information. X is one of the last platforms where ordinary people can still challenge power in real time — where whistleblowers, journalists, dissidents and citizens can bypass the gatekeepers of the BBC, the Guardian, and the permanent political class. That is why Starmer wants it controlled, regulated, or banned. Because control of speech is control of reality. The same government that is prepared to hand away the Chagos Islands, weaken Britain’s strategic position, and bend to foreign pressure now wants to decide what you are allowed to read, say, and share. They are not governing. They are managing decline. They are not protecting democracy. They are containing it. And the public knows it. Polls show historic distrust. Protests are growing. Support is evaporating. Starmer’s cabinet is not unpopular because it failed to communicate. It is unpopular because people can see exactly what it is doing. And what it is doing to Britain is unforgivable.
0:13

🚨 STARMER’S WAR ON FREE SPEECH: WHY HE WANTS X SILENCED AND BRITAIN CONTROLLED Keir Starmer’s government is rapidly becoming one of the most despised in modern British history — and for good reason. This is not a cabinet that rose on hope. It is a cabinet that rose on fear, censorship, and managed decline. In just a short time, Starmer’s Labour government has managed to alienate almost every pillar of British society: Working people crushed by taxes and energy costs. Farmers facing land grabs and inheritance raids. Veterans watching Britain give up strategic territory. Families struggling while billions are sent abroad. And citizens silenced for daring to speak out. This is not incompetence. It is ideology. Starmer governs as if Britain is an obstacle to be managed, not a nation to be defended. His cabinet speaks the language of global institutions, not the language of the British people. They treat borders as optional, sovereignty as outdated, and free speech as dangerous. And nothing exposes that more clearly than their obsession with shutting down X. They do not fear “misinformation.” They fear information. X is one of the last platforms where ordinary people can still challenge power in real time — where whistleblowers, journalists, dissidents and citizens can bypass the gatekeepers of the BBC, the Guardian, and the permanent political class. That is why Starmer wants it controlled, regulated, or banned. Because control of speech is control of reality. The same government that is prepared to hand away the Chagos Islands, weaken Britain’s strategic position, and bend to foreign pressure now wants to decide what you are allowed to read, say, and share. They are not governing. They are managing decline. They are not protecting democracy. They are containing it. And the public knows it. Polls show historic distrust. Protests are growing. Support is evaporating. Starmer’s cabinet is not unpopular because it failed to communicate. It is unpopular because people can see exactly what it is doing. And what it is doing to Britain is unforgivable.

Jim Ferguson

57,442 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🐝 I just saw a drone the size of a fly and it honestly made me pause. Not because it’s futuristic, but because it’s already here. Scientists are now building AI-powered micro-drones that look and move like real insects. Each one can fly, record, and transmit data — all while being almost invisible to the human eye. What’s truly new is the combination of biomimicry and artificial intelligence. They don’t just fly; they think like insects — adjusting to wind, avoiding obstacles, and navigating spaces too small for any traditional drone. Imagine what this unlocks: → Search and rescue in disaster zones → Environmental monitoring without disturbance → Precision agriculture and crop tracking → Real-time surveillance anywhere on Earth It’s an incredible leap in engineering and a powerful reminder that innovation often starts small. But as our machines learn to see everything, can we still decide what should remain unseen? #AI #Innovation #Drones #Technology #Future #Ethics #Surveillance
0:14

🐝 I just saw a drone the size of a fly and it honestly made me pause. Not because it’s futuristic, but because it’s already here. Scientists are now building AI-powered micro-drones that look and move like real insects. Each one can fly, record, and transmit data — all while being almost invisible to the human eye. What’s truly new is the combination of biomimicry and artificial intelligence. They don’t just fly; they think like insects — adjusting to wind, avoiding obstacles, and navigating spaces too small for any traditional drone. Imagine what this unlocks: → Search and rescue in disaster zones → Environmental monitoring without disturbance → Precision agriculture and crop tracking → Real-time surveillance anywhere on Earth It’s an incredible leap in engineering and a powerful reminder that innovation often starts small. But as our machines learn to see everything, can we still decide what should remain unseen? #AI #Innovation #Drones #Technology #Future #Ethics #Surveillance

Pascal Bornet

120,798 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Time, as the Rolling Stones said, is on my side. The Iranian side, that is. Iran is on land, commanding the Strait of Hormuz. The 'United States' is out at sea, and all of its base belong to us. Iran can break the imperial economy with its weapon of Mass Economic Destruction (MED), but the White Empire can't break them because they're used to it. The ships that didn't leave a month ago are not arriving just now and Iran just has to wait for the imperial economy to blow. Any minute now. Iran is not in a hurry to make (or break) this ceasefire. Their shots have already been fired and they just need to wait a little bit for 'America' to realize it. They can delay this day a bit using the futures market, but eventually the future becomes the present, and then what? All 'America' can do, in its furore, is close the strait even more, which just makes the straitjacket even tighter. 'America' has to move mountains to change their fate, but all Iran has to do is not move.
0:14

Time, as the Rolling Stones said, is on my side. The Iranian side, that is. Iran is on land, commanding the Strait of Hormuz. The 'United States' is out at sea, and all of its base belong to us. Iran can break the imperial economy with its weapon of Mass Economic Destruction (MED), but the White Empire can't break them because they're used to it. The ships that didn't leave a month ago are not arriving just now and Iran just has to wait for the imperial economy to blow. Any minute now. Iran is not in a hurry to make (or break) this ceasefire. Their shots have already been fired and they just need to wait a little bit for 'America' to realize it. They can delay this day a bit using the futures market, but eventually the future becomes the present, and then what? All 'America' can do, in its furore, is close the strait even more, which just makes the straitjacket even tighter. 'America' has to move mountains to change their fate, but all Iran has to do is not move.

indi.ca

19,844 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🚨 BREAKING – PAY ATTENTION 🚨🚨 If someone inside the FBI illegally leaked ICE operational data, they are facing criminal charges, loss of pension, and prison time. That part is obvious. But here’s the part people are pretending not to understand 👇 If you knew the information was stolen… If you knew it came from inside federal law enforcement… And you published it anyway to warn communities, disrupt operations, or obstruct enforcement… You are NOT protected. That crosses into aiding and abetting and potentially conspiracy. The First Amendment does NOT cover participation in an illegal scheme ⚖️ Stealing the data is a crime. Knowingly using stolen data to interfere with law enforcement is also a crime. This isn’t politics. This isn’t opinion. This is black-letter federal law. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
0:18

🚨🚨 BREAKING – PAY ATTENTION 🚨🚨 If someone inside the FBI illegally leaked ICE operational data, they are facing criminal charges, loss of pension, and prison time. That part is obvious. But here’s the part people are pretending not to understand 👇 If you knew the information was stolen… If you knew it came from inside federal law enforcement… And you published it anyway to warn communities, disrupt operations, or obstruct enforcement… You are NOT protected. That crosses into aiding and abetting and potentially conspiracy. The First Amendment does NOT cover participation in an illegal scheme ⚖️ Stealing the data is a crime. Knowingly using stolen data to interfere with law enforcement is also a crime. This isn’t politics. This isn’t opinion. This is black-letter federal law. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

171,657 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Did you know that in 1947, GE (General Electric) scientists were involved in a secret government program called Project Cirrus that seeded hurricanes to steer them? After seeding, the hurricane took an immediate sharp turn towards the southeast US. They did this 80 years ago... Did you also know there was another program called Project Stormfury from 1962-1983 that seeded hurricanes to a substantially higher degree to "learn whether the force of the storms can be diminished"? It's completely rational to think that they also learned more about how they can impact their trajectory towards landmass and increase it's destructive power. What if the government is just creating a human trauma farm and disaster economy so they can continue to make you more and more reliant on them and profit from it at the time? If still you're struggling to comprehend that kind of malice from these orgs, you must have been dead asleep for the past 4 years. To quote Richard Spinrad from a 2009 memo to HSARPA, who was the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) assistant administrator for the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR). "While OAR recognizes that weather modification, in general, is occurring through the funding of private enterprises, NOAA does not support research that entails efforts to modify hurricanes" Read this part very slowly - "is occurring through the funding of private enterprises" Geoengineering and weather modification is reality and you have to be blind or dishonest not to believe it at this point. The government can create, diminish, and steer hurricanes, and they've had the capacity to do so for decades. So yet again, you must now ask yourself... Would they do such a thing and willfully cause destruction and harm to their own citizens for a nefarious or profit motivated purpose? The answer is a resounding and undeniable YES, they would.
0:12

Did you know that in 1947, GE (General Electric) scientists were involved in a secret government program called Project Cirrus that seeded hurricanes to steer them? After seeding, the hurricane took an immediate sharp turn towards the southeast US. They did this 80 years ago... Did you also know there was another program called Project Stormfury from 1962-1983 that seeded hurricanes to a substantially higher degree to "learn whether the force of the storms can be diminished"? It's completely rational to think that they also learned more about how they can impact their trajectory towards landmass and increase it's destructive power. What if the government is just creating a human trauma farm and disaster economy so they can continue to make you more and more reliant on them and profit from it at the time? If still you're struggling to comprehend that kind of malice from these orgs, you must have been dead asleep for the past 4 years. To quote Richard Spinrad from a 2009 memo to HSARPA, who was the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) assistant administrator for the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR). "While OAR recognizes that weather modification, in general, is occurring through the funding of private enterprises, NOAA does not support research that entails efforts to modify hurricanes" Read this part very slowly - "is occurring through the funding of private enterprises" Geoengineering and weather modification is reality and you have to be blind or dishonest not to believe it at this point. The government can create, diminish, and steer hurricanes, and they've had the capacity to do so for decades. So yet again, you must now ask yourself... Would they do such a thing and willfully cause destruction and harm to their own citizens for a nefarious or profit motivated purpose? The answer is a resounding and undeniable YES, they would.

Inversionism

1,579,824 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Tokenization is quickly becoming one of the most talked-about ideas in crypto. This year we’re aiming much higher. We don’t just want to tokenize miner revenue; we want to bring entire productive ecosystems on-chain. That means tokenizing baskets of assets, real energy infrastructure, AI agents, compute power, data centres, and even the cooling systems that keep high-performance hardware running at scale. All of it connected and interoperable with DeFi. Thats what we have been building throughout. A single on-chain framework that unlocks something genuinely powerful: real ownership, real yield, and real coordination between digital and physical infrastructure. From backend systems and front-end interfaces to smart contracts, AI, physical infrastructure, oracles, and autonomous agents, the stack keeps expanding and compounding. It’s about building the foundation for how value will be owned, deployed, and earned in the next generation of the on-chain economy. Simplified by PinLink.
0:15

Tokenization is quickly becoming one of the most talked-about ideas in crypto. This year we’re aiming much higher. We don’t just want to tokenize miner revenue; we want to bring entire productive ecosystems on-chain. That means tokenizing baskets of assets, real energy infrastructure, AI agents, compute power, data centres, and even the cooling systems that keep high-performance hardware running at scale. All of it connected and interoperable with DeFi. Thats what we have been building throughout. A single on-chain framework that unlocks something genuinely powerful: real ownership, real yield, and real coordination between digital and physical infrastructure. From backend systems and front-end interfaces to smart contracts, AI, physical infrastructure, oracles, and autonomous agents, the stack keeps expanding and compounding. It’s about building the foundation for how value will be owned, deployed, and earned in the next generation of the on-chain economy. Simplified by PinLink.

PinLink

14,339 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten