正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Bret Weinstein and Aaron Siri discuss two paths for vaccine reform: 1. Reducing the recommendations (such as with today's CDC announcement) to match countries like Denmark, or 2. Ending the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act "...my feeling is I don't want this game anymore. Because as we said...

28,967 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

They might be in big trouble. Pfizer needed the covid injection recommended to children for liability protection. But the HHS Sec. Robert F Kennedy has just pulled the covid injection off the CDC schedule for healthy children. Pfizer are being exposed to more liability pressure AND Pfizer didn't report Maddie's injury to the FDA, who was in the children's clinical trial. TRANSCRIPT: Robert F Kennedy and Mikhaila Peterson: "So, what are your views on giving this COVID vaccine that they've made to kids? I know I'm from Canada, and I think that they're implementing that in order to go to school in Canada." Robert F Kennedy: "Well, they have to give it to kids because here's why": "They cannot market this vaccine without having an immunity shield. I mean, I sue pharmaceutical companies for a living, and I have enough criminal activity that I know about Pfizer at this point and Moderna that if they went ahead and marketed a vaccine where they end up killing people or injuring them, and I can sue them, they'd be through. So they're never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine, without getting liability protection. Now, the Emergency Use Authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and the CARES Act. So as long as you take an emergency use, you can't sue them. "Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children." Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children, get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine. That's why they're going after kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection." "And here's how they know that it's going to injure kids" "During the Pfizer study, they only tested it on 1,300 children, and one of those, we now know, was a girl called Maddie de Garay. And we only know about this because she and her family came forward and told us what happened.

Humanspective

52,425 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Bret Weinstein and Jeffrey Tucker expose the agenda to demonize Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine: “Every trick in the book was played.” “The idea is: you have to keep the population panicked.” “Hydroxychloroquine was taken off the map with a diabolical study in which people were wildly overdosed, and people died.” “It was made to look dangerous when it wasn't.” “You can't do that with Ivermectin because it's not toxic enough.” “It's almost impossible to give somebody enough to kill them.” “So they did other things.” “They ran studies in which they wildly underdosed.” “But the real question is, why would they bother if it's really useless?” “And I'm afraid that the answer has to be [that] if you allow people to use Ivermectin, they will discover how effective it is.” “Like hydroxychloroquine, it is generally useful against RNA viruses.” “At that point, when you introduce the vaccine, nobody will want it because there's a safe alternative.” “Why would I take something that turns out to be a gene therapy?” “There's an off-the-shelf drug that does it and costs nothing.” Tucker: “[There was] a phrase in there that drove Fauci and others crazy.” “Which was that we can get through this with natural immunity through exposure and recovery.” “That document came out about 3 weeks before the vaccine rollout.” “That was the reason they had to eliminate every possible alternative apart from injection as a solution.” Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute Bret Weinstein

Children’s Health Defense

188,736 次观看 • 4 个月前