Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Brian Armstrong On The Failed Clarity Act 0:25 Why the final Clarity Act draft was a good bill 1:43 What actually killed the Clarity Act 5:25 Is the Clarity Act dead for good? 7:42 Did the banks shoot themselves in the foot on stablecoin rewards? 9:26 What the SEC... show more
132,854 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)
11 Comments

"This was about politics" relative to what killed the bill. I mean, if you want to call folks being concerned that the POTUS has already rugged people twice on two meme coins, and who has shown a clear disregard for the emoluments clause his entire second term and the fact that the UAE bought $100M of WLFI and Quatar owns nearly half of WLFI which reeks of quid pro quo at best, OK.

Politicians voting for an Act that they know nothing about.

The gap between rulemaking and actual law is the key point here.

the bill is one thing. who gets the first compliant product live is the real race

Appreciate the Clarity Act breakdown. Builders need clearer rails more than another cycle of guessing. The agentic finance bit at the end is especially interesting for where crypto and AI actually meet.

Thanks for this masterpiece

Worth reading twice.

Today's outcome gave me a very real burst of confidence. I'm still having little bursts of excitement about it.

banks tanking stability with rewards, whats your take?

The interesting bottleneck may be distribution, not tokenization: if accredited-investor rules remain the gatekeeper, putting stocks onchain changes the rail without changing who can access the market.

The 2012 giveaway aged better than any bill

