正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Bridge CEO Zach Abrams on how stablecoins will lower traditional card fees: "There will be the emergence of infrastructure that provides fraud and chargeback prevention and so on, but gets rid of all the bank fees because you no longer need a bank–you have a wallet." "You'll have a...

14,523 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Mohammad 的头像
Mohammad7 个月前

Lower fees are compelling. But removing banks also removes embedded guarantees. Cards scale because enforcement and liability are standardized across the network. Stablecoins will need shared, infrastructure-level fraud and dispute controls to reach the same level of institutional trust.

eric 的头像
eric7 个月前

@zcabrams this dude is the chad of all chads started the neobank meta on his own shoulders

Mikhail (adhd arc) 的头像
Mikhail (adhd arc)7 个月前

@zcabrams let’s have it 💪

DiversiFi 的头像
DiversiFi7 个月前

@zcabrams Settlement speed changes everything.

SHALEX 的头像
SHALEX7 个月前

@zcabrams I don’t really think this might be realistic but would love to see this fr

Dr. Toxic 的头像
Dr. Toxic6 个月前

@zcabrams Paying fees in 2026 is like paying for air. Except air is actually useful.

Satora (ex-Lendasat) 的头像
Satora (ex-Lendasat)7 个月前

@zcabrams large scale organizations will start to apply this as soon as they see the benefit. 10bp is a benefit.

Chinedu Jude 的头像
Chinedu Jude7 个月前

@zcabrams I need help please

Bruno | Rebanking 的头像
Bruno | Rebanking6 个月前

@zcabrams Sounds good. For most people, it only matters when it feels simple to use.

相关视频

Robinhood CEO: In the future there will be no distinction between crypto and traditional finance “I think that crypto technology has so many advantages over the traditional way we’re doing things that in the future there will be no distinction. It’s kind of how technology itself was viewed as a sector of the economy for a very long time… I think crypto will go through the same transition where we’re still thinking about it in its own bucket but eventually everything will be on-chain in some form or another and the distinction will disappear.” Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev explains why this transition is taking so long: “I think the challenge with traditional finance — particularly on the infrastructure layer — is they have a lot of stakeholders, and if you think about where they generate the bulk of their revenue, it’s not from crypto-related initiatives. And a lot of these stakeholders, because they’re quite big, are going to be resistant and slower to adopt technologies. They’re going to be late adopters. They’re going to wait until it’s proven before adopting it, and that’s why we [Robinhood] have had to do greater vertical integration than we would normally want to do in TradFi. We acquired Bitstamp. We have our own exchange. And we have our own chain because I don’t think — to be at the frontier of crypto — you can rely on traditional infrastructure providers. I think they’ll get there eventually but it will take a very long time.” Ethereum will be the global settlement layer for this new financial system, and ETH will be its money. ETH is the base pair for trading on The Robinhood Chain, the highest volume asset, and the gas token to pay for blockspace. Source: TOKEN2049 (Oct 2025)

Etherealize

132,487 次观看 • 2 个月前

Last week, Mastercard, Visa, Ripple & Coinbase 🛡️ all shipped payment rails for AI agents. Every one of them reached for stablecoins Instead of traditional cards. A choice that is the whole story 👇🏻 ◢ An unpriced problem Card networks are built around a human pressing approve. One purchase, one confirmation, a fee that only makes sense above a certain size. Agents don’t work like that. They pay continuously, programmatically, often in fractions of a cent, for things like an API call or a second of compute. A bot paying $0.004 a thousand times an hour is a transaction pattern the card model physically can’t process at a profit. The rails we built for people don’t fit the machines. ◢ Four giants, one answer On june 3 mastercard opened card settlement in stablecoins across eight chains. On june 10 it launched Agent Pay for Machines, letting agents settle in stablecoins with permissions recorded onchain. The same day, ripple shipped a toolkit putting RLUSD and the x402 standard under agent payments, visa announced an agentic commerce tie-up with openai, and coinbase switched on agentic trading. Four of the biggest names in payments moved in a single week and all landed on the same primitive. ◢ Why it had to be stablecoins Strip out the branding and the requirements are mechanical. The money has to be programmable, so code can hold and move it without a bank in the loop. It has to clear sub-cent payments, which card fees make impossible. It also has to settle in seconds with finality, because that’s the speed agents run at. And it has to be always on, because machines don’t take weekends. A dollar in a bank account fails most of those, while a dollar as a stablecoin passes all of them. ◢ Conclusive Insights For years stablecoins were pitched at consumers who already had working banks and mostly didn’t bite. The adoption story kept underdelivering because the product was aimed at the wrong buyer. The agent economy doesn’t have that problem. It has no legacy banking relationship, no human patience, and no other option that clears at machine speed. The demand that stablecoins were always promised is finally showing up, but not from the customer everyone expected. My take: the entire stablecoin debate was framed around human payments, which is why it kept stalling.

Onur

13,737 次观看 • 3 个月前