Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Bridging assets between chains has always carried operational risk. That risk is a large part of why regulated institutions have stayed away. Simon Brooks, Principal Presales Engineer at R3, on the design choice behind the Corda bridge and what it means for settlement on Solana.
12,434 views • 20 days ago •via X (Twitter)
13 Comments

Should the $XRP and the $XDC communities take this news as R3 choosing Solana over XRP and XDC or is this another partnership that exists alongside of $XRP and $XDC?

R3 will use XRP and XDC... They can't even mention XRP cause they are under NDAs 😬 Everything will derive directly or indirectly from XRP

Lol NOT xrp

Did they miss the Trump meme coin debacle? Nothing against Solana, I even hold a little. But it got WAY bogged down that day with the spike in volume. Imagine the daily battering it will take settling the stock trades.

@beyond_broke

@beyond_broke …

Bridges are hack risks. Not a good choice at all.

@SMQKEDQG

👀👀👀👀

Shhh and don’t talk about xrp

Corda better stop. Rutter is scam artist pur sang

Horseshit. Exposing people to solana with 10000s of rugpulls everyday. Thats the real risk

A bridge should not ask an institution to surrender the controls that made the asset acceptable on its source network. The harder question is whether authority, history, and recovery rights remain verifiable after liquidity becomes portable.

