Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Brilliant performance, Ibraheemspider ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‘‘ He dethrones Ibrahim Nadim to become English Super Featherweight Champion ๐Ÿ‘ 100-90, 100-90, 98-92 ๐Ÿ“ #PadleyFiaz

23,484 views โ€ข 1 month ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

NEW LONG FORM VIDEO: The rise and fall of Intel: The collapse of Americaโ€™s chip champion In 2007, Steve Jobs called Intelโ€™s CEO with a proposal that could have changed the future of computing. Apple needed a new chip for an upcoming device called the iPhone. At the time, Intelโ€™s CEO, Paul Otellini, reviewed the numbers and didnโ€™t like what he saw. He didnโ€™t believe the device would sell in the volumes required to justify building a custom chip. So he said no. Looking back, Otellini admitted he regretted the decision. He said his gut told him to take the deal, but he followed the numbers instead. The problem was that the forecast was wrong, and not just slightly wrong. It was off by a factor of 100. Apple chose to go with ARM-based chips instead, a completely different architecture from Intelโ€™s. Since that fateful call, nearly 2 billion ARM chips have shipped in smartphones, while PC shipments during that same period totaled only about 250 million units. But that missed iPhone deal wasnโ€™t even Intelโ€™s biggest mistake. In 2000, Intel was worth over $500 billion and controlled 90% of the global PC market. Fast forward 25 years, and by November 2024, Intel was removed from the S&P 500 and replaced by Nvidia, a company that was once considered an afterthought. How does a company that dominant lose its edge? Was it leadership failures, market shifts, technological disruption, or something deeper? This is the rise and fall of Intel.

Michael Girdley

33,571 views โ€ข 4 months ago

Congrats to Ryan Ward for having his contract selected and being placed on the Dodgers' 40 Man Roster. Wardo was awarded as the Most Valuable Player in the PCL this past season after hitting .290, with an OPS of .937. He posted a WRC+ of 132, and his 36 home runs led ALL of the Minor Leagues During this season he also became the ALL-TIME home runs leader (90) and RBIs (318) in the history of the Bricktown Ballpark Era for OKC baseball. On a personal note, I've been going to AAA OKC games since 1975. That dates back to All-Sports stadium, and 6 different affiliation changes, 5 of which have been in my lifetime, and that I remember VERY well. So, to see this with my own eyes was truly historical on a personal level for me as well. #89ERS And, to have it happen in the first year of the new branding was a real "page turner" of OKC baseball, so that's SUPER cool too. Ward also drove in 122 runs, which is the most of ANY player in the PCL since 2010, and racked up the most total bases (315) of any player in the PCL since 2001. Ward also set single-season records for the Bricktown era in hits (164), runs (113), and RBIs (122). As per his defense... His outfield play has gotten better and better as each year has passed, and, while his bat will likely always be the"show stealer", he is a good athlete and has become a very solid outfielder. He can also play 1st base, and dabbled in a touch of 2nd base while at Bryant Baseball Speaking of Bryant, he's the only Bulldog ever to hit over .400 for a single season, and he struck out just 1 time his senior Season at Millbury, so the "hit tool" is NOT a new thing for him. As an aside, he graduated with fewer than 100 kids in his High School, and he is not shy to show pride in his "small town" work ethic. With all the home runs over the fence, his highlight of last year was an at-bat where he kept the ball IN the park. Wardo knocked an INSIDE-the-park WALKOFF home run back at the beginning of May. Congrats, Wardo, I could type ALL DAY about this dude, but that will do it for NOW. #dodgers

Dodgers Daily

21,255 views โ€ข 8 months ago

sua and suhyeon from billie mentioned #yeonjun on ebs fm ๐Ÿ‘ค suhyeon, do you know the word b.l.t? ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ b.l.t? what is that? is that a food? ๐Ÿ‘ค no! itโ€™s bighitโ€™s legendary trainee! do you not know him? ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ ah! is it perhaps that guy? ๐Ÿ‘ค thereโ€™s someone who feels like heโ€™ll chew and chomp on gum right away and overseas, heโ€™s called โ€˜it boyโ€™ because of his cool gaze! itโ€™s idol yeonjun! ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ heโ€™s someone with amazing talent! ๐Ÿ‘ค something he says is, โ€œyou just have to do it till you make itโ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ sua, what korean word comes to your mind when you think of yeonjun? ๐Ÿ‘ค i think heโ€™s someone thatโ€™s extremely passionate ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ passion. wow. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ the word he reminds me of isโ€ฆspirit? ๐Ÿ‘ค i think โ€˜spiritโ€™ perfectly suits him ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ i think โ€˜passionโ€™ and โ€˜spiritโ€™ fit him really well ๐Ÿ‘ค when heโ€™s on stageโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ heโ€™s really good at performing, isnโ€™t he? ๐Ÿ‘ค heโ€™s so good ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ yeonjun also released his solo mixtape, ggum, right? ๐Ÿ‘ค ggum~ ggum jilgeong~ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ what did you think of that? ๐Ÿ‘ค i watched the performance, the song and the music video and i think the song perfectly fit yeonjun ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ absolutely ๐Ÿ‘ค i think itโ€™s the epitome of yeonjun himself ๐Ÿ‘ค i think the performance was also full of โ€˜passionโ€™ and โ€˜spiritโ€™ ๐Ÿ‘ค it made me thinkโ€ฆhow can he perform that well? i think heโ€™s extremely confident and i think heโ€™s confident for a reason ๐Ÿ‘ค the performance made me think about a lot of things ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ i like โ€œconfident for a reasonโ€ cfr! ๐Ÿ‘ค cfr~ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ but since he always ranked #1 when he was a trainee, i do wonder if he also feels pressure ๐Ÿ‘ค if it were meโ€ฆi think iโ€™d always have that pressure but i saw an interview that yeonjun did and i donโ€™t think he said that he feels pressure ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ really? wow ๐Ÿ‘ค i think he said that since he was always #1, he wants to maintain that ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ wow i really respect him for that ๐Ÿ‘ค right? thatโ€™s also a type of confidence ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ i wonder how he has such a strong mindset ๐Ÿ‘ค exactly, i think that was cfr as well ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ cfr~ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ i feel like this could become a slang word ๐Ÿ‘ค cfr~ confident for a reason! ๐Ÿ‘ค what is the super skilled, yeonjunโ€™s secret? ๐Ÿ‘ค itโ€™s โ€œjustโ€ ๐Ÿ‘ค โ€œto just do itโ€ to just do something ๐Ÿ‘ค just do it~ itโ€™s about just doing it! note: this is a new segment on their show where theyโ€™ll introduce โ€œ100 idols that make korea shineโ€ and yeonjun was the first idol they introduced ๐Ÿค

๐Ÿ’ฌ

139,345 views โ€ข 1 year ago

๐Ÿšจ WARNING: THE SPACEX IPO IS THE BIGGEST TRAP OF 2026 Read this post carefully before buying SpaceX shares In 4 days, $SPCX will debut on Nasdaq The biggest IPO in history, with a valuation of around $1.8 trillion You may have noticed that demand has already exceeded $150 billion, while the public float is only 4-5% And I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the stock could easily jump 20-50% in the first days or weeks purely because of FOMO and the limited share supply But after that, the picture could change dramatically! 1. SpaceX didn't use the standard 180-day lock-up Instead, the S-1 includes a phased unlock schedule Insiders, employees, and early investors will be able to sell shares in stages starting in August: - August 21 (70 days) - +7% - September 10 (90 days) - +7% - September 25 (105 days) - +7% - October 10 (120 days) - +7% - October 25 (135 days) - +7% 2. On top of that, they removed the profitability requirement and are adding SpaceX to major indexes just 5 days after the IPO, while the usual waiting period is 90 days That forces 401(k) pension funds and passive index funds to buy SpaceX shares at inflated IPO prices and keep holding them throughout any decline 3. On top of that, there are major share releases after the Q2 earnings report (August) and Q3 earnings report (November) If the stock is trading 30% above the IPO price after Q2, a performance bonus will kick in and another +10% will be unlocked This staggered selling structure reduces the chance of one massive crash, but it creates several waves of selling pressure between August and November For comparison: when Meta went public in 2012 (one of the top 3 largest IPO in U.S. history, with a $104 billion valuation) The stock fell more than 60% within a few months after the IPO due to lock-up expirations and market concerns about its ability to monetize its business And there's one very important thing you need to remember! 4. The company is still unprofitable, posting roughly a $4.9 billion net loss in 2025 Passive funds (Nasdaq-100) will become forced buyers, but at the first sign of bad news they'll become forced sellers That's why I'm warning you not to become exit liquidity for insiders and VCs who have already made huge money from private funding rounds In the short term, the IPO looks very attractive for traders who know how to speculate But if you're planning to hold, you need to clearly understand this: August through November could bring serious volatility and a major correction I've said this before, and the cycle is still playing out exactly according to plan Turn on notifications and drop your thoughts below The next phase is gonna be very important

Leni

202,306 views โ€ข 1 month ago

Your trading strategy didn't break. The market it was built for quietly stopped existing. Read that twice. It's most of why 89% of retail finished 2025 in the red. There's now an app that does the entire job of a $400,000 quant. You type a trading idea in plain English. It writes the code, backtests 5 years in 12 seconds, runs thousands of simulations, and tells you cold whether your edge is dead or the regime just changed. No code. No Python. No $25,000 terminal. 20,000 already inside. Waitlist stops at 25,000: That distinction is the whole game, and you never had a way to see it. Every strategy is a bet that one thing stays true. Momentum bets trends continue. Mean reversion bets ranges hold. When the regime flips, the assumption dies and your strategy bleeds with nothing wrong in the code. You stare at the logic for a month and never find the bug, because there isn't one. So you delete it, or refit it to the last drawdown and build something that would have survived the pain you already felt and nothing coming next. The desks never had that problem. 92% of institutional volume is automated. Only 45% of retail is. They test 100 strategies for every 1 you test by hand, and kill 97 of them on purpose, because they can tell a dead edge from a normal drawdown. Now that exact loop costs $0. One hypothesis used to cost a fund $87,500 to test. With Horizon you get unlimited, in seconds, and a winner deploys live in 90 seconds and runs without your hands on it.

cvxv666

39,933 views โ€ข 1 month ago

A 67-year-old grandfather in Vermont built a trading bot during retirement - it earned him $290,000 in a single year without losing a single trade. 168 trades. 100% win rate. Zero drawdown across 365 days. The strategy is so safe it's basically a bond ladder - but with AI doing the probability math instead of credit ratings. His wallet: Here's how it actually works: He only takes bets the model is >85% sure of. Everything else? Killed. 188 events scanned per day. ~12 pass the filter. ~1 actually deploy. AI algo waits. Most days he doesn't trade at all. The probability model is stolen from weather forecasting: 31 models vote on every outcome. 28 out of 31 saying "yes" = 90% conviction. Below 26 = automatic reject. That's the entire edge. Polymarket is full of 87-92ยข markets that almost always settle at $1. Most traders ignore them - upside per dollar looks tiny. The math: edge = model_p โˆ’ market_p kelly = edge / (1 โˆ’ token_price) size = bankroll x kelly x 0.15 The stack runs free: Polymarket Gamma API for discovery, ClickHouse + Redpanda for the pipeline, paper mode validation before live capital. Brier score 0.041 across all 168 predictions. Anything under 0.10 is institutional-grade. He's printing the academic numbers. Most boring account on Polymarket. Also the most profitable - so save this post. And if youโ€™ve been looking for the most safest strategy to copy - youโ€™ve definitely found it. Get started:

cvxv666

113,458 views โ€ข 2 months ago

A 67-year-old grandfather in Vermont built a trading bot during retirement - it earned him $290,000 in a single year without losing a single trade. 168 trades. 100% win rate. Zero drawdown across 365 days. The strategy is so safe it's basically a bond ladder - but with AI doing the probability math instead of credit Here's how it actually works: He only takes bets the model is >85% sure of. Everything else? Killed. 188 events scanned per day. ~12 pass the filter. ~1 actually deploy. AI algo waits. Most days he doesn't trade at all. The probability model is stolen from weather forecasting: 31 models vote on every outcome. 28 out of 31 saying "yes" = 90% conviction. Below 26 = automatic reject. That's the entire edge. Polymarket is full of 87-92ยข markets that almost always settle at $1. Most traders ignore them - upside per dollar looks tiny. The math: edge = model_p โˆ’ market_p kelly = edge / (1 โˆ’ token_price) size = bankroll x kelly x 0.15 The stack runs free: Polymarket Gamma API for discovery, ClickHouse + Redpanda for the pipeline, paper mode validation before live capital. Brier score 0.041 across all 168 predictions. Anything under 0.10 is institutional-grade. He's printing the academic numbers. Most boring account on Polymarket. Also the most profitable - so save this post. And if youโ€™ve been looking for the most safest strategy to copy - youโ€™ve definitely found it. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment Your thoughts . 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan

Marry Evan

16,352 views โ€ข 2 months ago

๐ŸšจUnder no circumstances should you attend Trumpโ€™s July 4th event He is aware that temperatures may be literally *deadly* but is doing a โ€œreally long speech just to show that I could do anythingโ€ at 9:45PM *before* fireworks. Also, CBS did NOT air his event much less make it โ€œone of the highest rated fights in history.โ€ It was Paramount+ only. He lives in a world where the planet will suddenly change the weather for himโ€”where events that never happened become precedent for the future. Heโ€™s relying on his divine powers to prevent people from dying on July 4th. Read it. โ€œOn July 4th, it's going to be approximately 107 degrees out. And I'm going to go and I'm going to make a really long speech just to show that I could do anything. It's going to be 107. But you know what? They also predicted the fight that we had three weeks ago was unbelievable at the White House. They said, "A week before, six days, five days, four days, three days, two days, one day." They said, "It was going to rain. It's going to be horrible. You're going to have to cancel the fight." Sure, we're going to have to count. This was a big event. This was one of the highest rated fights in history. It was on CBS National on a Sunday night. That is Saturday night. Saturday night's called Death Valley, for television. I know a lot about ratings. But Sunday night's very good and it was broadcast on CBS and network. And it got among the highest ratings, any fight has ever gotten. But they said it was going to rain. And I talked to Dana white I said, "Dana, I don't know. This is bad." Sir, it's 100 percent chance of rain. I said, "You sure? Like maybe 90?" No, 100 percent, sir. So it was seven o'clock and it wasn't raining. And it started at eight o'clock and we were going to delay it till 12 o'clock midnight. I said, "That's not good." But it wasn't raining at eight o'clock. It wasn't raining at eight o'clock. And we had the fight on time and it never rained. Never. So you never know about whether forecasting do you, the only money we spend, we spend all that money. That's happened before. We had a big march in Washington. You remember that? That was going to be rained out, sir. We're going to have to change it. Rained out, never rained. So we're getting pretty good at that.โ€

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

114,852 views โ€ข 26 days ago

A 67-year-old grandfather in Vermont built a trading bot during retirement - it earned him $290,000 in a single year without losing a single trade. 168 trades. 100% win rate. Zero drawdown across 365 days. The strategy is so safe itโ€™s basically a bond ladder - but with AI doing the probability math instead of credit ratings. Hereโ€™s how it actually works: He only takes bets the model is >85% sure of. Everything else? Killed. 188 events scanned per day. ~12 pass the filter. ~1 actually deploy. AI algo waits. Most days he doesnโ€™t trade at all. The probability model is stolen from weather forecasting: 31 models vote on every outcome. 28 out of 31 saying โ€œyesโ€ = 90% conviction. Below 26 = automatic reject. Thatโ€™s the entire edge. Polymarket is full of 87-92ยข markets that almost always settle at $1. Most traders ignore them - upside per dollar looks tiny. The math: edge = model_p โˆ’ market_p kelly = edge / (1 โˆ’ token_price) size = bankroll ร— kelly ร— 0.15 The stack runs free: Polymarket Gamma API for discovery, ClickHouse + Redpanda for the pipeline, paper mode validation before live capital. Brier score 0.041 across all 168 predictions. Anything under 0.10 is institutional-grade. Heโ€™s printing the academic numbers. Most boring account on Polymarket. Also the most profitable - so save this post. And if youโ€™ve been looking for the safest strategy to copy - youโ€™ve definitely found it. You only need Claude + Device + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free Dm for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment What Ever you think about it. ( Mandatory ) 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan

Marry Evan

12,266 views โ€ข 1 month ago

American-made drone smashes performance metrics at Chinese prices | Loz Blain, New Atlas A new drone company has exploded out of stealth mode in the USA with incredible claims about its first product, saying it'll fly 4X longer, 10X further, 10X quieter and carry 5X more payload than leading competitors โ€“ while competing with China on cost. Let's start with the numbers. Silicon Valley-based SiFly has announced two industrially targeted models with some absolutely ludicrous stats attached. The smaller Q12 platform carries up to 10 lb (4.5 kg) of payload. It can hover for a remarkable two hours - or manage three hours in forward flight, for an operational range of 90 miles (145 km). The company says it's radically quieter than anything in its class as well, and "nearly silent at 100 meters" (328 ft). Deliveries are slated to begin at the end of the year. The larger Q250 platform is built for heavy lift, and capable of carrying a 200 lb (90.7-kg) payload for 100 minutes of endurance. Set for launch in 2026, it's designed for fire suppression, cargo missions and crop spraying at a fraction of what the usual helicopter would cost. "Commercial drones have long forced organizations to compromise between flight duration, payload capacity, and operational range," said Brian Hinman, Founder and CEO of SiFly, in a press release. "We eliminated those trade-offs. SiFly drones are transforming emergency response, infrastructure inspection, and logistics โ€“ delivering helicopter-class performance at drone economics." The company says it's validated its performance claims in real-world operations, naming California's Amaral Ranches as an early pre-launch deployment partner. The question of course is ... how? Drones are a well-understood technology now that's been dominated from the very beginning by Chinese companies. If SiFly's figures hold up and this company truly puts 4-10X multiples on these key performance stats, it's sitting on some revolutionary technology advances in energy storage, propulsion, aerodynamics and/or materials โ€“ areas that are already highly optimized after more than a decade of commercial and industrial drone development. Annoyingly, there's nothing particularly revolutionary-looking in the renders, and SiFly has yet to explain exactly how it's achieved such a radical leap in performance โ€“ not to mention how it's managed to design and manufacture in the USA at prices competitive with Chinese competition. Or indeed, what these prices are. Which would give this company a strong whiff of vapor... But former NASA Chief Technologist for On-Demand Mobility and current Whisper Aero CEO Mark Moore (who knows a thing or two about quiet propulsion systems at the very least) lends this group some third-party credibility in a LinkedIn post: "SiFly's reveal today is kinda breathtaking in terms of capabilities," he writes. "I've personally been able to see this drone develop through the years, and know the principals as serious players. The specifications they've achieved are really impressive, from the empty weight fraction to the cruise Lift/Drag - this is the best multicopter out there, by far. And while they don't hype it up, they've designed this product to be affordable so that it can be used en masse as a swarming solution. Well worth a watch. Well worth the money. Awesome job!" Read more:

Owen Gregorian

72,742 views โ€ข 1 year ago

This AI whistleblower just EXPOSED Sam Altman for manipulating his way into becoming OpenAIโ€™s CEO. Everyone who helped him build it has left because they felt used. Karen Hao interviewed 300 people including 90 current and former OpenAI employees. And she just told Steven Bartlett what she discovered: In 2015, Altman needed Elon Musk to co-found OpenAI. Problem was, Musk was obsessed with AI as an existential threat. So Altman wrote a blog post calling AI "probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity." Before that blog post? Altman's biggest fear was engineered viruses. Not AI. He literally rewrote his worldview overnight to mirror Musk's language word for word. Musk bought in. Donated millions. Co-founded the company. Then Altman stabbed him in the back. When OpenAI needed a CEO for its new for-profit arm, the co-founders Ilia Sutskever and Greg Brockman initially chose Musk. Altman went directly to Brockman, a personal friend, and said: "Do we really want someone this erratic and unpredictable to control a technology that could be super powerful?" Brockman flipped. Then convinced Ilia to flip. Musk found out he wasn't getting the role and left. That's how the biggest rivalry in tech actually started. Not over ideology... Over a backroom power play. But here's where it gets darker: Every single person who built OpenAI alongside Altman eventually felt the same thing Musk felt. Used. Manipulated. Discarded. Dario Amodei, VP of Research, thought Altman shared his vision. Over time he realized Altman was on "exactly the opposite page" and had used his intelligence to build things he fundamentally disagreed with. He left and founded Anthropic. Ilia Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist, tried to get Altman fired. He told colleagues: "I don't think Sam is the guy who should have the finger on the button for AGI." He was pushed outounded Safe Super Intelligence. That name alone tells you everything. Mira Murati, CTO, left and started Thinking Machines Lab. No other tech company in history has had every single co-builder leave and start a direct competitor. Not Google. Not Meta. Not Apple. NOBODY. 300 interviews exposed one consistent pattern: If you align with Altman's vision, you think he's the Steve Jobs of AI. If you don't, you feel like you were manipulated by someone who will say whatever is needed to whoever is listening. When talking to Congress? AGI will cure cancer and solve poverty. When talking to consumers? It's the best digital assistant you'll ever have. When talking to Microsoft? AGI is a system that generates $100 billion in revenue. Three completely different definitions of the same technology sold to three completely different audiences. And if you publicly disagree with any of it? OpenAI subpoenaed 7 nonprofit organizations that criticized them. Sent a sheriff to a 29yo nonprofit lawyer's door during dinner demanding every text, email, and document he'd ever sent about OpenAI. A one-man watchdog nonprofit got papers demanding all communications with anyone who questioned the company. OpenAI's own head of mission alignment publicly said "this doesn't seem great." That's the guy whose literal job is making sure OpenAI BENEFITS humanity. Former employees who spoke up about secret non-disparagement clauses that threatened to strip their equity described the psychological pressure as "crushing." This is the company that tells us it's building technology "for the benefit of humanity." Same company that mirrors whatever language gets them funded. Same company where every builder eventually walks away feeling deceived. Same company sending law enforcement to silence critics. The biggest AI company on Earth wasn't built on technology. It was built on one man's ability to tell everyone exactly what they needed to hear. And the scariest part is that it worked.

Ricardo

385,180 views โ€ข 4 months ago