正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

463,790 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

Les Nessman 的头像
Les Nessman6 天前

The dipshittery is strong with this one.

JoeyC 的头像
JoeyC6 天前

No. That is not how any of this works. 😂 There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution saying impeachment “nullifies” a president’s term. Impeachment by the House is the bringing of charges; acquittal by the Senate simply means the president is not removed through that impeachment proceeding. It does not erase the years they served, undo their election, or magically reset the presidential term-limit counter. The 22nd Amendment is remarkably clear: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” Trump was elected in 2016 and 2024. Twice. His two previous impeachments and Senate acquittals did not erase his first term, and another impeachment wouldn't erase this one either. There is no constitutional “impeachment = two bonus lives” rule. Someone simply made that up. 😏

Snickel ⚡️ 的头像
Snickel ⚡️6 天前

lol, want to blow a MAGAs mind? This is FAKE NEWs..

m.cowles 的头像
m.cowles6 天前

the Constitution does not say that. Impeachment by the House without conviction in the Senate has no effect on a president's term or their eligibility under the 22nd Amendment, which limits a president to two terms total regardless of impeachment history.

Original SuzayQ 的头像
Original SuzayQ6 天前

You really think he’s going to live 10 more years? You want a 90 year old running our country? He’s old. No thank you!

Zach Tate 的头像
Zach Tate6 天前

I fact checked this and it is not true. This interpretation of the U.S. Constitution is inaccurate; the 22nd Amendment strictly limits presidents to two elected terms, and impeachment proceedings do not reset or nullify term counts as confirmed by constitutional experts and fact-checks. Trump needs a vacation in any regard, and Vance and/or Rubio are now both well qualified to take the MAGA Mantle.

Ian Tickle 的头像
Ian Tickle6 天前

The two-term rule is the 22nd Amendment: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” It counts elections, not impeachment outcomes. Nothing in its text, or in the impeachment clauses, says an unconvicted impeachment wipes a term and resets the count.

Brendan Makidon 的头像
Brendan Makidon6 天前

Show me where it says this in this, in this document.

Darrell W. Cook 的头像
Darrell W. Cook6 天前

Fucking moron. The U.S. Constitution does not state that impeachment by the House without Senate conviction nullifies a president's term or allows them to run for two more terms. The 22nd Amendment limits any person to being elected president no more than twice.

Fitzbizzel 的头像
Fitzbizzel6 天前

Must be in the Cherry Pickers Constitution. I’ll have to find it cause I misplaced it next to my Cherry Pickers Bible.

klusterfk10 的头像
klusterfk106 天前

That is simply a false statement about the Constitution.

Chandler Calloway 的头像
Chandler Calloway6 天前

From @grok No. That meme is made up. Nothing in the Constitution nullifies a term because the House impeached and the Senate didn’t convict. The 22nd Amendment is plain: no one gets elected president more than twice. A person who has already served more than two years of someone else’s term can only be elected once. Impeachment isn’t in that math. Impeachment is just the House charging you. Conviction and removal take a two-thirds vote in the Senate. Trump was impeached twice and acquitted both times. Those terms still counted. He served 2017–2021, and the current term is the second election. That’s the limit. Acquittal doesn’t erase the calendar, and it doesn’t hand out extra runs. The mountain doesn’t care what a TikTok says either.

Matthew Stark 的头像
Matthew Stark6 天前

This is the Dems dream to have this guy run again in 2028. That’s how they would get AOC in.

Ma Frt 的头像
Ma Frt6 天前

100% false House impeachment alone does not remove a president, end a term, or reset eligibility. Only a Senate conviction can remove someone from office (and the Senate may separately bar them from future office). Trump was impeached by the House twice (2019 and 2021) and acquitted by the Senate both times; those proceedings did not nullify either term or create extra eligibility.

Scott 的头像
Scott6 天前

Someone slept thru 4th grade civics

debra martino 的头像
debra martino6 天前

Ok!

Nicholas Vigue 的头像
Nicholas Vigue6 天前

You've never actually read the thing, have you? This is where I make a disparaging joke about the questionable intellect of blondes... Otherwise:

Jim Young 的头像
Jim Young6 天前

You can't be this stupid but yet here you are

Bob Marshall 的头像
Bob Marshall6 天前

Geez, let him run. It would seal the fate of the Republican Party.

@hartleyh11 的头像
@hartleyh116 天前

Total bullshit. If that's the case then Clinton would have run again in 2000 and beat Bush.

Rhiannon Welles 的头像
Rhiannon Welles6 天前

Morons. Term limits come from the 22nd Amendment: no one may be elected president more than twice. Impeachment without conviction does not alter how terms are counted or create any extra bar.

libertarianass 的头像
libertarianass6 天前

Yeah...the Constitution says no such thing.

norhoc 的头像
norhoc6 天前

Stunning how fucking stupid some people are. Critical thinking is going extinct.

Ju man-XRP! 的头像
Ju man-XRP!6 天前

You're retarded aren't you?

Patrick Spurlock 的头像
Patrick Spurlock6 天前

READER'S NOTE: The Constitution does not say that a President's first term is nullified merely because the House impeaches him or her and the Senate never conducts a trial. The key distinction is between impeachment and conviction/removal, and there's nothing about "nullifying" a term The Constitution contains no provision saying: "If a President is impeached but not convicted, the President's term—or first term—doesn't count." So the constitutional issue isn't whether an impeachment "erases" a term. Rather, it is whether impeachment, removal, or some other event affects whether a completed presidency counts as an "election" to the presidency for purposes of the 22nd Amendment.

🔴🟡🟢 yo-fak 的头像
🔴🟡🟢 yo-fak6 天前

Where do you people come up with this shit? Completely false. Read the Constitution.

Vivian O'Shea 的头像
Vivian O'Shea6 天前

Makes me laugh. He is doing a horrible job running this country and his followers still dream about keeping him in. If this isn’t a cult then I’ve never seem one before. The normal person would judge him by his actions and what he is doing to help this country. They are not.

SGBraphog 的头像
SGBraphog6 天前

literally where in the entirety of all the united states written documents does it say that

kk 的头像
kk6 天前

It doesn't matter no one wants another boomer presidency

John Ross 的头像
John Ross6 天前

None of that is remotely true

frank🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 的头像
frank🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿6 天前

Great news for the free world, democrats was bad for all, we all felt the ripple effect

Steve P 的头像
Steve P6 天前

Annnndd that’s not true. Fucking idiots out this morning heavy

Sapient Hominid 的头像
Sapient Hominid6 天前

I dare you to reproduce the part of the Constitution that says this.

Eldritch Cob 的头像
Eldritch Cob6 天前

That's not remotely true. Anyone that believes this is a moron.