正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Bringing in professional analysis ⚡️😤 Seth Dillard - Aerodynamics/CFD Engineer for RFK Racing - gave us a full breakdown from this CFD of Lightning McQueen.

248,805 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

iRacing 的头像
iRacing1 年前

A+ content

SVG’s Rugby Ball 的头像
SVG’s Rugby Ball1 年前

Analysis on Chick Hick’s moustache next please

Bozi Tatarevic 的头像
Bozi Tatarevic1 年前

This is awesome.

Zach Steinmetz🌽🌪️ 的头像
Zach Steinmetz🌽🌪️1 年前

Seth I respect your expertise but I suspect that Lightning’s tires blowing out had more to do with the fact that he ran at least 207 laps (and likely many more) on them at their version of Bristol, while also spinning out and navigating a wreck on that set of tires.

Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing 的头像
Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing1 年前

Can someone analyze Francesco? We like cars without fenders.🤷

RFK Racing 的头像
RFK Racing1 年前

Cars 2 didn’t exist

Dr Obbs 的头像
Dr Obbs1 年前

Admin unaware this CFD analysis would turn into a banger.

ahmed baokbah 🇸🇦 🏎️🛩️ 的头像
ahmed baokbah 🇸🇦 🏎️🛩️1 年前

Best aero analysis of all time

Spectral 的头像
Spectral1 年前

stop body shaming mcgroomer

Nick DeMers 的头像
Nick DeMers1 年前

Haha. This is cool. However, please tell the aero guy to spend more time analyzing RFK cars. Us RFK fans are starving for a W.

Aaron World of Cars 的头像
Aaron World of Cars1 年前

I’m curious what the difference is in his Cars 2 design. Has he has a different spoiler, a covering underneath, and different sidescurts

maddie 😀👍 的头像
maddie 😀👍1 年前

Can we get a CFD scan of Cars 2 mcqueen now, with the different rear wing?

Trav 的头像
Trav1 年前

I work in Technology. I bet working with this guy is awesome

Troy Shear 的头像
Troy Shear1 年前

Let’s check aero with Lightning McQueen in yaw, the way Doc Hudson taught him to drive…

Paul Grey 的头像
Paul Grey1 年前

@LiamLawson30

𝙬𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙨 的头像
𝙬𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙨1 年前

Yes but this doesn’t take into account him arching his back for dynamic aero control

Ranger The Destroyer 的头像
Ranger The Destroyer1 年前

@AZSportsCar80

Lugnut 的头像
Lugnut1 年前

I mean... call me crazy... if I were in charge at RFK I would have this dude working around the clock to make the cars competitive. not wasting time on Lightning McQueen... but what do I know... I don't care about social media traffic... I care more about on track performance.

kyle murphy 的头像
kyle murphy1 年前

@dr_obbs care to weigh in?

Andey E 的头像
Andey E1 年前

This is epic. As good as social content gets.

Name 🪐 的头像
Name 🪐1 年前

Yall hiring 👀

Brendengnzls 的头像
Brendengnzls1 年前

The mold they used for the 2006 line is different from the mold they’ve used from 2017 onwards. Anyway we can get this redone with the original diecast mold?

Nima 的头像
Nima1 年前

@F430str do a counter

MrBNSFtrain 的头像
MrBNSFtrain1 年前

So Lightning McQueen was designed with some realism in mind! Dusty Crophopper in the Planes movies was also animated realistically to his design

Ray Zapata 的头像
Ray Zapata1 年前

Give this man a raise

Fola 的头像
Fola1 年前

😹😹no way this just got more real , need Matt Armstrong to buy a salvaged corvette and turn it into A McQueen project now

Thalezzzzzzzzz 的头像
Thalezzzzzzzzz1 年前

@KevinNicolasPF1 @canaleffe

d̶m̶c̶s̶h̶i̶n̶o̶b̶i̶ 🦥🛸 的头像
d̶m̶c̶s̶h̶i̶n̶o̶b̶i̶ 🦥🛸1 年前

so this is how I find out Cars was fiction this whole time? 😔

CLM 🇵🇸 的头像
CLM 🇵🇸1 年前

Think we’re all greed cars 2 is the worst.

FUNHAVER 的头像
FUNHAVER1 年前

This is cool and all but shouldn’t you be trying to make RFKs cars faster and better handling

The 900HP car NASCAR is afraid of🏳️‍🌈🇿🇦 的头像
The 900HP car NASCAR is afraid of🏳️‍🌈🇿🇦1 年前

We need a Jackson Storm CFD

Aaron Nastaskin 的头像
Aaron Nastaskin1 年前

Is surprising how separate is the flow in the back for a fastback design. Only for know, what speed or conditions do you use for simulation?

Cristian 的头像
Cristian1 年前

Hey, why dont you use this time and resources to improve the real cars, 3 cars and no playoff, no wins no nothing

׺°”˜`”°º× (Green MSN Guy) ×º°”˜`”°º× 的头像
׺°”˜`”°º× (Green MSN Guy) ×º°”˜`”°º×1 年前

He needs some vortex generators on the roof, or to squint when he's driving. Few strakes on the floor wouldn't hurt either

相关视频

New policy at CFD, and it's a doozy. Under a new order, CFD responding to all residential fires at buildings under 7 stories are to approach the art of fighting fires in the most risk-averse way. This new order places restrictions under which CFD can enter a burning building. In sum, the new guidelines state CFD must observe a victim inside or have confirmation from an OEMC dispatcher or on-scene witness a victim remains inside a burning structure before entering the building. This new policy means CFD, who under ordinary circumstances would have likely entered the burning structure to aggressively battle the fire and search for occupants of the home, are now essentially spectators to structures burning to the ground. This is what CFD now refers to as "Defensive Operations." In other words, if you are trapped in a fire in Chicago and you are not visible to CFD, you'll have to fend for yourself. The video attached captures a blaze on the NW Side of Chicago today. This fire is believed to have started on a back porch, but there was no report of residents trapped in the home. Note the number of CFD watching the inferno from the street. This new guideline is motivated by the City of Chicago's desire to reduce the number of injuries or duty-deaths sustained by CFD. Bad policy, while no one wishes CFD to suffer grievous injury or death, there are hazards to the profession firefighters willingly accept when they are inducted into CFD. Like CPD, the firefighting profession requires men and women willing to put themselves in peril. This new policy will reduce risk to CFD but increase the risk to citizens in burning buildings. Aside from the risk to civilians, this new policy exposes Chicago to extraordinary liability. The cost in court is immeasurable. The City Council must address this. This new policy places our family members, neighbors and residents are now at greater risk and it is turning CFD into curious onlookers as buildings burn.

Chicago Contrarian

49,101 次观看 • 1 年前