Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 BRITAIN’S DEFENCE EXPOSED: THREE WEEKS TOO LATE This interview wasn’t just uncomfortable… it was a warning. A nation once defined by naval power — reduced to excuses, deflection, and confusion. Three weeks. That’s how long it took to get ONE British warship into position. While allies moved faster....

16,097 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 THIS IS WHO YVETTE COOPER REALLY IS — AND WHY THIS IS A DISGRACE While 35 nations sign onto President Trump’s peace initiative, Britain has chosen to stand aside. And the decision comes from Yvette Cooper — a woman who has spent years publicly attacking Donald Trump and everything he represents. Let’s remind people who she is. Yvette Cooper has previously described President Trump as: • “dangerous” • “reckless” • “a threat to global stability” She openly opposed his presidency. She mocked his diplomacy. She dismissed his leadership — even when he delivered historic peace agreements. Now she sits in Keir Starmer’s Cabinet, lecturing the world about morality while rejecting a peace framework supported by dozens of nations. That is not neutrality. That is prejudice. This isn’t about Putin. This isn’t about legality. This isn’t about constitutional caution. This is ideological hatred overriding Britain’s national interest. While others move toward de-escalation, Britain chooses permanent conflict. While others engage to shape peace, Britain sulks on the sidelines. And the result? Less influence. Less relevance. Less voice at the table. A Home Secretary who cannot separate personal hostility toward President Trump from Britain’s strategic interests is unfit for the responsibility she holds. Peace is not endorsement. Dialogue is not surrender. Diplomacy is not weakness. But refusing to engage — because you dislike the man proposing it — is disgraceful. This government is not leading Britain. It’s shrinking it.

Jim Ferguson

161,726 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 STARMER HIDES WHILE ALLIES DEFEND GLOBAL SHIPPING In an astonishing display of weakness, the government of Keir Starmer is refusing to send British warships to help secure the Strait of Hormuz — even as global energy supplies and international shipping come under threat. While President Donald Trump has called on allies to step up and help escort tankers through one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints, the response from Downing Street has been hesitation, excuses, and political cowardice. When pressed by GB News journalist Mark White, Labour minister Pat McFadden tried to justify the government’s refusal by claiming Britain does not want to be a “protagonist” in the conflict. But this argument collapses immediately under scrutiny. Escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz is not joining a war. It is a defensive mission to protect global commerce, energy supplies, and international shipping routes that Britain itself depends on. The reality is stark. While American forces move to stabilise the region and protect maritime trade, Britain — once the world’s leading naval power — now appears unwilling to stand alongside its closest ally. At a time when leadership is required, Starmer’s government is choosing passivity. Oil prices are surging. Global supply chains are under threat. And yet the British Prime Minister appears determined to sit on the sidelines while others carry the burden of defending the world’s most vital sea lane. For decades the United Kingdom stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States in defence of global security. Under Starmer, that tradition now appears dangerously uncertain.

Jim Ferguson

396,040 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 STARMER LOOKS OUT OF HIS DEPTH — AND THE WORLD CAN SEE IT This was not leadership. This was damage control. Keir Starmer standing in front of the cameras, repeating safe lines about “national interest” while the geopolitical ground shifts beneath his feet. Let’s be honest: This is a Prime Minister reacting… not leading. • Mocked openly on the world stage • Dodging direct questions • Hiding behind generic talking points • Offering no clear strategic direction This is not how serious leaders operate during a global crisis. At a time when alliances are being tested, wars are expanding, and power blocs are shifting… Britain needs strength. Instead, we’re getting hesitation. Instead of projecting authority, Starmer sounds like an administrator trying to manage optics — not a statesman shaping outcomes. And here’s the real problem: The “special relationship” with the United States is not maintained through polite statements and careful wording. It requires: Clarity. Strength. Decisiveness. Right now, none of those are on display. While President Trump applies pressure publicly, Starmer responds defensively — not strategically. That sends a message. Not just to Washington… but to the world. Britain looks uncertain. Britain looks reactive. Britain looks weak. And in geopolitics, perception becomes reality very quickly. This is bigger than a disagreement. This is about whether the UK still has serious leadership at the top — or whether it’s being managed rather than led.

Jim Ferguson

25,873 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад