Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 BRITAIN’S SURRENDER CONTINUES Reports are now emerging that a draft treaty could see Gibraltar — the Rock itself — handed over to Spain. Let that sink in. Gibraltar is not just a territory. It is a symbol of British history, sacrifice, and sovereignty. For more than 300 years... it has stood as a strategic gateway and a reminder of Britain’s role as a maritime power. And now, under Keir Starmer, even that may be negotiable. This is not diplomacy. It looks like managed decline. From the Chagos Islands… to energy dependence… to borders left unsecured… and now potentially Gibraltar — the pattern is becoming impossible to ignore. Piece by piece, leverage by leverage, Britain’s strategic assets appear to be on the table. A government’s first duty is to protect the nation. Not dilute it. Not surrender it. Not negotiate it away. If Gibraltar is handed over, many will ask a simple question: Who is this government really serving?show more

Jim Ferguson

444,417 subscribers

95,339 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The idea that TTrump'sump's blockade is needed to get Iran to the table is bizarre - the blockade pushed Iran away from the table. Trump gambles that the blockade is a silver bullet that will force Iran to surrender. We have been here before - Iran will not capitulate, particularly not now, since it believes it handed the US a strategic defeat.

The idea that TTrump'sump's blockade is needed to get Iran to the table is bizarre - the blockade pushed Iran away from the table. Trump gambles that the blockade is a silver bullet that will force Iran to surrender. We have been here before - Iran will not capitulate, particularly not now, since it believes it handed the US a strategic defeat.

Trita Parsi

39,673 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

It was a privilege to speak to the Chagossians outside of Parliament. 🇮🇴 Giving away the Chagos Islands is anti-British. This shocking Labour government does not care about Britain’s interests or the interests of the Chagossian people. This Labour government is giving away a British territory and, disgracefully, making British taxpayers pay £35 billion for it.

It was a privilege to speak to the Chagossians outside of Parliament. 🇮🇴 Giving away the Chagos Islands is anti-British. This shocking Labour government does not care about Britain’s interests or the interests of the Chagossian people. This Labour government is giving away a British territory and, disgracefully, making British taxpayers pay £35 billion for it.

Priti Patel MP

32,067 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This government ARE traitors. It can’t be denied any more. Not content with handing over the Chagos islands they’ve now given the border control of Gibraltar to the Spanish and EU officials. Why? If you land at the airport or port, BRITISH territory, your entry and passport will now be checked and controlled by EU officials. It’s treachery. #Gibraltar #gibraltese #eu #spain #bordercontrol #traitors #treachery #davidlammy #keirstarmer

This government ARE traitors. It can’t be denied any more. Not content with handing over the Chagos islands they’ve now given the border control of Gibraltar to the Spanish and EU officials. Why? If you land at the airport or port, BRITISH territory, your entry and passport will now be checked and controlled by EU officials. It’s treachery. #Gibraltar #gibraltese #eu #spain #bordercontrol #traitors #treachery #davidlammy #keirstarmer

JohnHann0404🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

24,440 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We are opposed to Labour’s reckless Chagos Surrender Bill. •It gives away a British territory to a foreign government. •It will cost the British taxpayer £35 billion. •It puts British security and defence at risk. •The Chagossian people do not want it. Keir Starmer is weak, and his Labour government is failing to stand up for Britain and our place in the world.

We are opposed to Labour’s reckless Chagos Surrender Bill. •It gives away a British territory to a foreign government. •It will cost the British taxpayer £35 billion. •It puts British security and defence at risk. •The Chagossian people do not want it. Keir Starmer is weak, and his Labour government is failing to stand up for Britain and our place in the world.

Priti Patel MP

51,120 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: GREENLAND WAS JUST THE WARNING — CHAGOS IS NEXT After President Trump made it clear that strategic territory matters more than paper treaties, the spotlight is now swinging toward another critical outpost the globalists want to give away: the Chagos Islands. Retired British admirals, generals, and RAF commanders are now openly warning that Keir Starmer’s plan to hand Chagos to Mauritius is dishonest, reckless, and a direct threat to UK and U.S. security. Diego Garcia is not a postcard. It is one of the most important military bases on Earth — the backbone of Western power projection across the Indo-Pacific and Middle East. Trump understands what Starmer either doesn’t, or refuses to admit: You don’t defend leases. You defend ownership. After signaling that Greenland is too vital to leave in weak hands, Trump’s logic applies just as brutally to Chagos. A Britain that surrenders its strategic assets is not just weakening itself — it is weakening America, NATO, and the entire Western security architecture. While Starmer bows to lawyers and activist pressure, real military leaders are sounding the alarm. And now, with Trump back in the arena and drawing hard lines over territory, the global chessboard is shifting fast. Greenland showed the doctrine. Chagos may be the next test. And if Starmer keeps giving away the crown jewels, he won’t just be remembered as weak — he’ll be remembered as the man who sold out the West. Donald J. Trump

🚨 BREAKING: GREENLAND WAS JUST THE WARNING — CHAGOS IS NEXT After President Trump made it clear that strategic territory matters more than paper treaties, the spotlight is now swinging toward another critical outpost the globalists want to give away: the Chagos Islands. Retired British admirals, generals, and RAF commanders are now openly warning that Keir Starmer’s plan to hand Chagos to Mauritius is dishonest, reckless, and a direct threat to UK and U.S. security. Diego Garcia is not a postcard. It is one of the most important military bases on Earth — the backbone of Western power projection across the Indo-Pacific and Middle East. Trump understands what Starmer either doesn’t, or refuses to admit: You don’t defend leases. You defend ownership. After signaling that Greenland is too vital to leave in weak hands, Trump’s logic applies just as brutally to Chagos. A Britain that surrenders its strategic assets is not just weakening itself — it is weakening America, NATO, and the entire Western security architecture. While Starmer bows to lawyers and activist pressure, real military leaders are sounding the alarm. And now, with Trump back in the arena and drawing hard lines over territory, the global chessboard is shifting fast. Greenland showed the doctrine. Chagos may be the next test. And if Starmer keeps giving away the crown jewels, he won’t just be remembered as weak — he’ll be remembered as the man who sold out the West. Donald J. Trump

Jim Ferguson

60,356 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Starmer is desperate to attack the United States. But Vance, Rubio and Hegseth are fully aware of what he is. They know his regime is aligned with the CCP. They know he lied about Chinese opposition to the Chagos surrender. They know he handed over a vital strategic base and British sovereignty to facilitate it. The Chagos deal was a betrayal of the United Kingdom’s national interest and a gift to China. The Trump administration will not forget. Neither will the British people. Starmer has turned the “special relationship” into open hostility with our closest ally while grovelling to our greatest adversary. This is not leadership. This is treason dressed up as diplomacy.

Starmer is desperate to attack the United States. But Vance, Rubio and Hegseth are fully aware of what he is. They know his regime is aligned with the CCP. They know he lied about Chinese opposition to the Chagos surrender. They know he handed over a vital strategic base and British sovereignty to facilitate it. The Chagos deal was a betrayal of the United Kingdom’s national interest and a gift to China. The Trump administration will not forget. Neither will the British people. Starmer has turned the “special relationship” into open hostility with our closest ally while grovelling to our greatest adversary. This is not leadership. This is treason dressed up as diplomacy.

Right over Left Everytime

494,441 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Let me be absolutely clear: the greatest strategic threat we face today is China. It is acting in open defiance of international law, militarising vital sea lanes, threatening its neighbours and preparing for blockades that would choke global trade. The Chagos Islands sit at the heart of those east–west trade routes. At a moment when China is rapidly building a navy that will soon rival the United States, this Labour Government has chosen to give up one of our most critical strategic assets. That is not realism, it is recklessness. Handing Chagos to Mauritius, a country with close ties to Beijing, weakens our security and that of our allies. Worse still, Mauritius has made clear it will not allow nuclear weapons on the islands. Once sovereignty is transferred, that restriction applies in full. The Government’s ambiguity on this point is dangerous. The treaty is rushed, badly drafted and ignores the binding UK–US agreement that requires Chagos to remain under British sovereignty. You cannot quietly trade away a strategic base and hope no one notices. Let me also be clear about the human cost. What was done to the Chagossians in the past was wrong, morally wrong, and we must own that. But this treaty does not put them first. I would rather do a direct deal with the Chagossians themselves: allow them to return, restore their rights, and compensate them properly under continued UK control. If we allow this surrender to go through, we will look back and know that we gave away control of one of the most critical places on earth at the very moment the free world could least afford it.

Let me be absolutely clear: the greatest strategic threat we face today is China. It is acting in open defiance of international law, militarising vital sea lanes, threatening its neighbours and preparing for blockades that would choke global trade. The Chagos Islands sit at the heart of those east–west trade routes. At a moment when China is rapidly building a navy that will soon rival the United States, this Labour Government has chosen to give up one of our most critical strategic assets. That is not realism, it is recklessness. Handing Chagos to Mauritius, a country with close ties to Beijing, weakens our security and that of our allies. Worse still, Mauritius has made clear it will not allow nuclear weapons on the islands. Once sovereignty is transferred, that restriction applies in full. The Government’s ambiguity on this point is dangerous. The treaty is rushed, badly drafted and ignores the binding UK–US agreement that requires Chagos to remain under British sovereignty. You cannot quietly trade away a strategic base and hope no one notices. Let me also be clear about the human cost. What was done to the Chagossians in the past was wrong, morally wrong, and we must own that. But this treaty does not put them first. I would rather do a direct deal with the Chagossians themselves: allow them to return, restore their rights, and compensate them properly under continued UK control. If we allow this surrender to go through, we will look back and know that we gave away control of one of the most critical places on earth at the very moment the free world could least afford it.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

78,491 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

Redpill Drifter

104,419 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“Trump’s team wants to scrap it [Putin’s war against Ukraine ] from the agenda.” Lavrov. Lavrov is confirming what many have long feared: that the Trump presidency would serve Russian interests. “This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team, that does not reflect the philosophy of the incumbent US administration. I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda so as to eliminate obstacles for normal economic, technological and other relations. This will not be easy because the United States has a peculiar approach towards addressing and resolving economic issues.” Lavrov said. "This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team..." This statement is a complete inversion of reality. A blatant and self-serving lie, repeated daily by Trump. Russia feels it can openly lie about the origins of the war because the U.S. President is not a reliable bulwark against Russian disinformation. Putin’s war is not "artificial" or a creation of the Biden administration. It is a full-scale, unprovoked invasion, killing thousands of Ukranians. Russia's actions are driven by its own imperial ambitions and its long-standing desire to subjugate Ukraine and undermine its sovereignty. Lavrov is essentially saying "the war is artificial because we want it to be over on our terms, and now we have a fool who agrees.” The war is a reflection of putin’s “philosophy”, not Biden's. This is the most revealing and chilling part of the statement. Lavrov is essentially giving a back-handed compliment to Trump, confirming that the "philosophy" of the current U.S. administration is to abandon Ukraine. Lavrov is celebrating the fact that the U.S. is no longer committed to the principles of a sovereign, independent Ukraine and is instead more aligned with Russia's view on Ukraine and Europe. Trump's "philosophy" is not about peace, but about appeasement and capitulation, driven by a personal disdain for previous U.S. policy and a fascination with authoritarian strongmen like putin, Xi and Kim Jong Un. "I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda..." This is a direct admission of collusion. Lavrov openly stating that Russia and the U.S. are working together to end the war, but on Russia’s terms. "Scrapping it from the agenda" is a euphemism for forcing Ukraine to surrender territory, a position that would be an outrageous betrayal by Trump. Trump is not seeking a just peace, but rather a quick resolution that allows Russia to claim victory. It confirms that the primary obstacle to Russia's goals has been removed, and the path to a Russian-dictated peace is now open. It is not just propaganda; it is an open admission of a new strategic reality. It confirms that Russia has successfully exploited U.S. political divisions to find a partner in the White House, and that it now feels confident enough to publicly celebrate the unraveling of the West's collective front against Russian aggression.

“Trump’s team wants to scrap it [Putin’s war against Ukraine ] from the agenda.” Lavrov. Lavrov is confirming what many have long feared: that the Trump presidency would serve Russian interests. “This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team, that does not reflect the philosophy of the incumbent US administration. I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda so as to eliminate obstacles for normal economic, technological and other relations. This will not be easy because the United States has a peculiar approach towards addressing and resolving economic issues.” Lavrov said. "This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team..." This statement is a complete inversion of reality. A blatant and self-serving lie, repeated daily by Trump. Russia feels it can openly lie about the origins of the war because the U.S. President is not a reliable bulwark against Russian disinformation. Putin’s war is not "artificial" or a creation of the Biden administration. It is a full-scale, unprovoked invasion, killing thousands of Ukranians. Russia's actions are driven by its own imperial ambitions and its long-standing desire to subjugate Ukraine and undermine its sovereignty. Lavrov is essentially saying "the war is artificial because we want it to be over on our terms, and now we have a fool who agrees.” The war is a reflection of putin’s “philosophy”, not Biden's. This is the most revealing and chilling part of the statement. Lavrov is essentially giving a back-handed compliment to Trump, confirming that the "philosophy" of the current U.S. administration is to abandon Ukraine. Lavrov is celebrating the fact that the U.S. is no longer committed to the principles of a sovereign, independent Ukraine and is instead more aligned with Russia's view on Ukraine and Europe. Trump's "philosophy" is not about peace, but about appeasement and capitulation, driven by a personal disdain for previous U.S. policy and a fascination with authoritarian strongmen like putin, Xi and Kim Jong Un. "I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda..." This is a direct admission of collusion. Lavrov openly stating that Russia and the U.S. are working together to end the war, but on Russia’s terms. "Scrapping it from the agenda" is a euphemism for forcing Ukraine to surrender territory, a position that would be an outrageous betrayal by Trump. Trump is not seeking a just peace, but rather a quick resolution that allows Russia to claim victory. It confirms that the primary obstacle to Russia's goals has been removed, and the path to a Russian-dictated peace is now open. It is not just propaganda; it is an open admission of a new strategic reality. It confirms that Russia has successfully exploited U.S. political divisions to find a partner in the White House, and that it now feels confident enough to publicly celebrate the unraveling of the West's collective front against Russian aggression.

Yasmina

228,695 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

“The simplest acts of kindness are by far more powerful than a thousand heads bowing in prayer.” Day after day, #Sebaashray2 proves that kindness is not a ritual, not a performance, not a staged promise, it is a force that walks straight into the lives of the people. You can hear it in the steady hum of service that refuses to pause, even for a moment. Sebaashray is not just an initiative, it is a reminder that governance can have a heartbeat. That care can be limitless. That compassion can be organised, disciplined, and unshakeable. Wherever it reaches, it leaves behind a simple truth: dignity is not charity, and service is not sympathy. It is responsibility. It is duty. And it is the moral compass that guides this mission every single day. In each lane, under every tent, across every queue, Sebaashray embodies what true public service must look like: quiet, constant, and deeply human.

“The simplest acts of kindness are by far more powerful than a thousand heads bowing in prayer.” Day after day, #Sebaashray2 proves that kindness is not a ritual, not a performance, not a staged promise, it is a force that walks straight into the lives of the people. You can hear it in the steady hum of service that refuses to pause, even for a moment. Sebaashray is not just an initiative, it is a reminder that governance can have a heartbeat. That care can be limitless. That compassion can be organised, disciplined, and unshakeable. Wherever it reaches, it leaves behind a simple truth: dignity is not charity, and service is not sympathy. It is responsibility. It is duty. And it is the moral compass that guides this mission every single day. In each lane, under every tent, across every queue, Sebaashray embodies what true public service must look like: quiet, constant, and deeply human.

Abhishek Banerjee

253,696 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The Epic of Resistance 🎼 This is not just a symphony. This is what resistance sounds like. Composed by Majid Entezami, the Epic of Khorramshahr is not played… it is remembered. It carries the echo of the Battle of Khorramshahr during the Iran–Iraq War... when a city was shattered and occupied… then reclaimed by a people who refused to disappear. They believed fire would silence it. They believed steel would break it. They believed time would erase it. But they misunderstood something fundamental: You can destroy buildings… but not belief. You can occupy land… but not dignity. Listen. The violins do not mourn defeat— they rise like voices from beneath the dust. The drums are not war— they are the pulse of a nation that never stopped beating. The crescendo is not sound— it is return. Like Jerusalem… Khorramshahr fell— and then Khorramshahr rose — and so too will Jerusalem. And in its rising, a message was written into history: That oppression is loud… but resistance is eternal. Today, the same rhythm echoes— in every people who refuse humiliation, in every nation that stands when it is told to kneel, in every voice that says: enough. The oppressed the world over, do not hear this music as the past— but as a covenant. A promise carried across generations: That injustice exhausts itself. That arrogance overreaches. That truth, though tested, does not break. This is why the melody does not end. It advances— from rubble to resistance, from resistance to resurgence, from resurgence to victory. History has a pattern: Empires arrive with certainty. They leave with silence. But those who endure— write the final verse. And so the symphony continues… not as memory alone— but as prophecy. Victory is not a moment. It is a direction. And those who refuse to surrender are already moving toward it… They see victory—and joy and smiles— in Tehran and Gaza, in Beirut and Sana’a, in Baghdad and Jerusalem… in every city with a resisting soul and a tight fist... as candle by candle is rekindled, and as light by light is ignited across the world… until the darkness fades, until racism ends, and until supremacism dismantled.

The Epic of Resistance 🎼 This is not just a symphony. This is what resistance sounds like. Composed by Majid Entezami, the Epic of Khorramshahr is not played… it is remembered. It carries the echo of the Battle of Khorramshahr during the Iran–Iraq War... when a city was shattered and occupied… then reclaimed by a people who refused to disappear. They believed fire would silence it. They believed steel would break it. They believed time would erase it. But they misunderstood something fundamental: You can destroy buildings… but not belief. You can occupy land… but not dignity. Listen. The violins do not mourn defeat— they rise like voices from beneath the dust. The drums are not war— they are the pulse of a nation that never stopped beating. The crescendo is not sound— it is return. Like Jerusalem… Khorramshahr fell— and then Khorramshahr rose — and so too will Jerusalem. And in its rising, a message was written into history: That oppression is loud… but resistance is eternal. Today, the same rhythm echoes— in every people who refuse humiliation, in every nation that stands when it is told to kneel, in every voice that says: enough. The oppressed the world over, do not hear this music as the past— but as a covenant. A promise carried across generations: That injustice exhausts itself. That arrogance overreaches. That truth, though tested, does not break. This is why the melody does not end. It advances— from rubble to resistance, from resistance to resurgence, from resurgence to victory. History has a pattern: Empires arrive with certainty. They leave with silence. But those who endure— write the final verse. And so the symphony continues… not as memory alone— but as prophecy. Victory is not a moment. It is a direction. And those who refuse to surrender are already moving toward it… They see victory—and joy and smiles— in Tehran and Gaza, in Beirut and Sana’a, in Baghdad and Jerusalem… in every city with a resisting soul and a tight fist... as candle by candle is rekindled, and as light by light is ignited across the world… until the darkness fades, until racism ends, and until supremacism dismantled.

Sami Al-Arian

103,097 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Britain needs a Government now that understands the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.

Britain needs a Government now that understands the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.

Conservatives

14,460 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."

ANI

14,687 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Webb on dignified transfers: It is the role of the commander-in-chief to be there. It's not a choice, it is a role, it is something you have to do and that is the difference. Trump’s recognition as commander-in-chief..

Webb on dignified transfers: It is the role of the commander-in-chief to be there. It's not a choice, it is a role, it is something you have to do and that is the difference. Trump’s recognition as commander-in-chief..

Acyn

48,864 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

A woman is about to be executed for one “crime”, speaking out. That’s the reality of the Iranian regime. This is not a government that values freedom. This is not a regime moved by polite diplomacy. It silences dissent. It punishes courage. It fears its own people. And history has shown, they don’t respond to words. They respond to strength.

A woman is about to be executed for one “crime”, speaking out. That’s the reality of the Iranian regime. This is not a government that values freedom. This is not a regime moved by polite diplomacy. It silences dissent. It punishes courage. It fears its own people. And history has shown, they don’t respond to words. They respond to strength.

Rep. Wesley Hunt Press Office

84,133 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

ANI

48,501 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

🚨 RUBIO: “THIS WAR WILL NOT BE SOLVED MILITARILY” Marco Rubio just delivered a blunt assessment: No one is winning. Russia is losing 7,000–8,000 soldiers a week — dead and wounded. Ukraine’s infrastructure is being systematically destroyed. Rebuilding will take billions. Years. His conclusion? “This is a senseless war.” And here’s the key line: In the end, it will not be solved militarily. It will end in negotiation. Rubio says the United States may be the only nation capable of bringing both sides to the table — and that walking away from that responsibility is not an option. Not escalation. Not permanent war. Negotiation. Whether it succeeds or not remains uncertain. But this is the first clear admission from senior U.S. leadership that battlefield victory is not the objective — settlement is. The real question now: Who is prepared for compromise?

🚨 RUBIO: “THIS WAR WILL NOT BE SOLVED MILITARILY” Marco Rubio just delivered a blunt assessment: No one is winning. Russia is losing 7,000–8,000 soldiers a week — dead and wounded. Ukraine’s infrastructure is being systematically destroyed. Rebuilding will take billions. Years. His conclusion? “This is a senseless war.” And here’s the key line: In the end, it will not be solved militarily. It will end in negotiation. Rubio says the United States may be the only nation capable of bringing both sides to the table — and that walking away from that responsibility is not an option. Not escalation. Not permanent war. Negotiation. Whether it succeeds or not remains uncertain. But this is the first clear admission from senior U.S. leadership that battlefield victory is not the objective — settlement is. The real question now: Who is prepared for compromise?

Jim Ferguson

233,682 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten