Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BRTTTTTTTT Thailand’s 5th Air Defense Artillery Battalion has released additional footage showing M163 VADS units providing combat support across multiple fronts along the Thai–Cambodian border. HellHeight Lewis RK ( Mechalomania ) Lee Ann Quann Army Military Force T-55AM1

wuthi11_'s profile picture

Нем🥖

4,840 subscribers

59,203 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

HellHeight Lewis RK ( Mechalomania ) Lee Ann Quann Army Military Force T-55AM1 This is probably the first video showing a close-up of a destroyed Cambodian T-55. I’m not saying it’s the same one as in the clip above.
0:22

HellHeight Lewis RK ( Mechalomania ) Lee Ann Quann Army Military Force T-55AM1 This is probably the first video showing a close-up of a destroyed Cambodian T-55. I’m not saying it’s the same one as in the clip above.

Нем🥖

19,705 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

HellHeight Lewis RK ( Mechalomania ) Lee Ann Quann Army Military Force T-55AM1 Thailand’s M60A3 TIFCS, upgraded by Elbit Systems with a 3rd-generation thermal sight. You can see many M426 APFSDS shells inside the tank, This APFSDS round can penetrate any Cambodian T-55s like a hot knife through butter.
1:18

HellHeight Lewis RK ( Mechalomania ) Lee Ann Quann Army Military Force T-55AM1 Thailand’s M60A3 TIFCS, upgraded by Elbit Systems with a 3rd-generation thermal sight. You can see many M426 APFSDS shells inside the tank, This APFSDS round can penetrate any Cambodian T-55s like a hot knife through butter.

Нем🥖

28,581 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The M48A5 took out T-55s. This clash between the two is a very classic matchup, but the Cambodian side was at a serious disadvantage due to being in lower ground. HellHeight Lewis RK ( Mechalomania ) Lee Ann Quann Army Military Force T-55AM1
3:45

The M48A5 took out T-55s. This clash between the two is a very classic matchup, but the Cambodian side was at a serious disadvantage due to being in lower ground. HellHeight Lewis RK ( Mechalomania ) Lee Ann Quann Army Military Force T-55AM1

Нем🥖

600,290 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

💢 Hezbollah published footage from its May 19 FPV drone strike on an Israeli Iron Dome battery in Misgav Am, an Israeli border town directly across from the Lebanese border town of Adaisseh. The new footage comes amid a broader campaign of Hezbollah FPV drone attacks targeting Israeli air defense systems and military vehicles and troops in occupied areas of Lebanon and along the northern front. Hezbollah has now claimed at least 10 separate strikes on Iron Dome systems in recent weeks, including multiple attacks on the heavily fortified Biranit Barracks, an Israeli military command base near the Lebanon border west of Misgav Am. A montage circulating online (see below) compiles confirmed Hezbollah FPV drone strikes carried out over roughly the past six weeks, showing repeated attacks on Israeli military positions, surveillance systems, armored vehicles, and air defense infrastructure across northern Israel and the occupied border region.
0:57

💢 Hezbollah published footage from its May 19 FPV drone strike on an Israeli Iron Dome battery in Misgav Am, an Israeli border town directly across from the Lebanese border town of Adaisseh. The new footage comes amid a broader campaign of Hezbollah FPV drone attacks targeting Israeli air defense systems and military vehicles and troops in occupied areas of Lebanon and along the northern front. Hezbollah has now claimed at least 10 separate strikes on Iron Dome systems in recent weeks, including multiple attacks on the heavily fortified Biranit Barracks, an Israeli military command base near the Lebanon border west of Misgav Am. A montage circulating online (see below) compiles confirmed Hezbollah FPV drone strikes carried out over roughly the past six weeks, showing repeated attacks on Israeli military positions, surveillance systems, armored vehicles, and air defense infrastructure across northern Israel and the occupied border region.

Drop Site

16,360 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇹🇭🇺🇸 THAILAND EYES HIMARS AFTER ROCKET THREATS, ARMY MOVES TO UPGRADE FIREPOWER Tensions in Southeast Asia are pushing Thailand toward a major military upgrade. The Royal Thai Army is planning to procure advanced rocket artillery under its 2027 defense budget, following concerns over heavy rocket attack capabilities from across the Cambodian border. At the center of the discussion is the US made M142 HIMARS, a highly mobile, precision strike system that has gained global attention in modern conflicts. 🚩 Why HIMARS is leading: • Long-range precision strike capability • Rapid “shoot-and-scoot” mobility • Proven effectiveness in real combat scenarios A selection committee is currently comparing it with China’s SR-5 Multiple Rocket Launcher and Thailand’s domestic DTi D11A. However, Thai media reports suggest HIMARS is the most likely choice, hinting at a possible strategic lean toward Western systems. ◽Bigger picture: This move isn’t just procurement, it’s about deterrence and staying ahead in a rapidly evolving regional security environment. If approved, Thailand would join a growing group of countries investing in precision rocket systems as the dynamics of warfare continue to shift.
1:13

🇹🇭🇺🇸 THAILAND EYES HIMARS AFTER ROCKET THREATS, ARMY MOVES TO UPGRADE FIREPOWER Tensions in Southeast Asia are pushing Thailand toward a major military upgrade. The Royal Thai Army is planning to procure advanced rocket artillery under its 2027 defense budget, following concerns over heavy rocket attack capabilities from across the Cambodian border. At the center of the discussion is the US made M142 HIMARS, a highly mobile, precision strike system that has gained global attention in modern conflicts. 🚩 Why HIMARS is leading: • Long-range precision strike capability • Rapid “shoot-and-scoot” mobility • Proven effectiveness in real combat scenarios A selection committee is currently comparing it with China’s SR-5 Multiple Rocket Launcher and Thailand’s domestic DTi D11A. However, Thai media reports suggest HIMARS is the most likely choice, hinting at a possible strategic lean toward Western systems. ◽Bigger picture: This move isn’t just procurement, it’s about deterrence and staying ahead in a rapidly evolving regional security environment. If approved, Thailand would join a growing group of countries investing in precision rocket systems as the dynamics of warfare continue to shift.

Defence Index

16,120 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The advance of two armies and a tank division of the Russian armed forces was repelled: forces of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine destroyed dozens of units of equipment and a large number of occupier personnel. On July 22, the occupiers, using forces of the 8th and 41st Armies along with the 90th Tank Division, attempted an assault in the sector held by the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, involving dozens of units of armored and light vehicles. The 41st Guards Combined Arms Army and the 90th Guards Vitebsk-Novgorod Tank Division of the Russian armed forces advanced from the area of the settlement of Novoekonomichne, while forces of the 8th Guards Combined Arms Army simultaneously advanced from the area of the village of Vozdvyzhenka. For four hours, they attempted to enter settlements in the area of the village of Shakhove. The enemy attempted to deny the sky to Ukrainian forces using "Gerbera" and "Lancet" strike drones. A modern Russian "Tornado-S" MLRS, which was being used to support the assault, was also destroyed. Forces of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, together with attached units, blocked the path of the advancing mechanized columns. Mine-explosive obstacles were laid on the approaches to the positions of the Ukrainian Defense Forces, and bridges were damaged by tactical aviation. During the assault, the Russians attempted to restore the crossings using pontoons, but these were destroyed by tactical aviation of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU). As a result of the professional actions of all units involved under the command of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, using barrel artillery, multiple launch rocket systems, and attack drones, the following were destroyed: 7 tanks, 6 armored combat vehicles, 1 BM-21 "Grad" MLRS, 1 "Tornado-S" MLRS, 3 units of special equipment, and 47 units of light vehicles. 123 occupiers were eliminated, and 29 were wounded. The mechanized assault was repelled. We thank the units of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, the SBU's "A" Special Operations Center, the Unmanned Systems Forces, the Air Force of the AFU, units of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, in particular the Main Department of Unmanned Aerial Systems "Fenix," units of the National Guard of Ukraine, and units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for their professional and courageous actions. Always ready to repel the enemy's assault through joint efforts!
2:34

The advance of two armies and a tank division of the Russian armed forces was repelled: forces of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine destroyed dozens of units of equipment and a large number of occupier personnel. On July 22, the occupiers, using forces of the 8th and 41st Armies along with the 90th Tank Division, attempted an assault in the sector held by the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, involving dozens of units of armored and light vehicles. The 41st Guards Combined Arms Army and the 90th Guards Vitebsk-Novgorod Tank Division of the Russian armed forces advanced from the area of the settlement of Novoekonomichne, while forces of the 8th Guards Combined Arms Army simultaneously advanced from the area of the village of Vozdvyzhenka. For four hours, they attempted to enter settlements in the area of the village of Shakhove. The enemy attempted to deny the sky to Ukrainian forces using "Gerbera" and "Lancet" strike drones. A modern Russian "Tornado-S" MLRS, which was being used to support the assault, was also destroyed. Forces of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, together with attached units, blocked the path of the advancing mechanized columns. Mine-explosive obstacles were laid on the approaches to the positions of the Ukrainian Defense Forces, and bridges were damaged by tactical aviation. During the assault, the Russians attempted to restore the crossings using pontoons, but these were destroyed by tactical aviation of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU). As a result of the professional actions of all units involved under the command of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, using barrel artillery, multiple launch rocket systems, and attack drones, the following were destroyed: 7 tanks, 6 armored combat vehicles, 1 BM-21 "Grad" MLRS, 1 "Tornado-S" MLRS, 3 units of special equipment, and 47 units of light vehicles. 123 occupiers were eliminated, and 29 were wounded. The mechanized assault was repelled. We thank the units of the First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine, the SBU's "A" Special Operations Center, the Unmanned Systems Forces, the Air Force of the AFU, units of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, in particular the Main Department of Unmanned Aerial Systems "Fenix," units of the National Guard of Ukraine, and units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for their professional and courageous actions. Always ready to repel the enemy's assault through joint efforts!

First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine

498,325 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. House Oversight has agreed to let Bill and Hillary Clinton testify virtually from their home in Chappaqua regarding their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. 2. FedEx has sued the Trump administration seeking a full refund for tariffs recently struck down by the Supreme Court, arguing the costs significantly impacted the company. 3. Reports indicate the likely new head of CJNG is 29-year-old Abraham Ambriz Cano, known as “El Yogurt,” who previously led special forces operations under El Mencho and survived a Mexican Navy raid. 4. xAI has signed a deal with the U.S. Department of Defense to integrate Grok into classified systems, marking a major step for AI use within secure military environments. 5. Footage from Tapalpa, Jalisco shows Mexican Army forces surrounding CJNG elements, with reports of dozens killed and arrests across multiple states. 6. Secretary Hegseth said he did not anticipate overseeing full UFO and UAP file declassification, responding to questions about aliens with, “We’ll see… I get to find out right along with you.” 7. Peter Mandelson was reportedly arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office following allegations he leaked confidential UK government memos to Epstein. 8. Peter Attia has stepped aside from CBS News after his name appeared repeatedly in newly released Epstein documents. 9. The Mexican warship Usumacinta has docked in Puerto Vallarta carrying 400 military personnel and operational vehicles, while the Air Force deployed tactical aircraft as part of a major security operation. 10. Sec. Hegseth met with Anthropic’s CEO at the Pentagon regarding the use of Claude within classified systems, as defense officials review AI guardrails and future deployment parameters.
0:47

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. House Oversight has agreed to let Bill and Hillary Clinton testify virtually from their home in Chappaqua regarding their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. 2. FedEx has sued the Trump administration seeking a full refund for tariffs recently struck down by the Supreme Court, arguing the costs significantly impacted the company. 3. Reports indicate the likely new head of CJNG is 29-year-old Abraham Ambriz Cano, known as “El Yogurt,” who previously led special forces operations under El Mencho and survived a Mexican Navy raid. 4. xAI has signed a deal with the U.S. Department of Defense to integrate Grok into classified systems, marking a major step for AI use within secure military environments. 5. Footage from Tapalpa, Jalisco shows Mexican Army forces surrounding CJNG elements, with reports of dozens killed and arrests across multiple states. 6. Secretary Hegseth said he did not anticipate overseeing full UFO and UAP file declassification, responding to questions about aliens with, “We’ll see… I get to find out right along with you.” 7. Peter Mandelson was reportedly arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office following allegations he leaked confidential UK government memos to Epstein. 8. Peter Attia has stepped aside from CBS News after his name appeared repeatedly in newly released Epstein documents. 9. The Mexican warship Usumacinta has docked in Puerto Vallarta carrying 400 military personnel and operational vehicles, while the Air Force deployed tactical aircraft as part of a major security operation. 10. Sec. Hegseth met with Anthropic’s CEO at the Pentagon regarding the use of Claude within classified systems, as defense officials review AI guardrails and future deployment parameters.

Mario Nawfal

90,274 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

UAE-Backed Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed) Circulates New Video Humiliating Civilians The UAE-backed Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed) circulated a new video this morning showing its fighters insulting and humiliating a large group of unarmed civilians, forcing them to sit on the ground while being made to chant slogans under threat. The militiamen can be heard shouting racist and degrading insults, calling the victims “slaves,” and boasting about entering areas that once belonged to the Sudanese Armed Forces’ 6th Infantry Division. It is still unclear what happened to these civilians after the video was recorded, raising serious fears that they may have been tortured or executed by the militia. This footage reflects the militia’s deeply rooted culture of violence and humiliation, a scene that has been repeated in every city or village it has entered across Darfur and beyond. It also explains why El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, has stood firm for more than 550 days, because its people know that wherever the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed) advances, it tortures, humiliates, and terrorizes the residents of that land. According to military sources, the Sudanese Armed Forces confirmed that some units had tactically repositioned from limited areas around the city while continuing to engage the enemy on other fronts and maintain defensive lines to protect civilians under extremely difficult humanitarian conditions. Meanwhile, the militia released new footage this morning from inside the army garrison in El Fasher in an attempt to create a false image of victory and instill fear among the population. At the same time, hundreds of civilians fled the city toward the Golo area in search of safety, before the terrorist militia deployed a force from the north and surrounded them in the open desert, where gunfire was later heard. This new display of brutality and false propaganda once again exposes the true nature of the UAE-backed Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). It is a terrorist organization that thrives on spreading fear and humiliation, targeting innocent people to intimidate and subdue them. Despite this, the protection of civilians remains an urgent priority and a moral responsibility for the entire international community in the face of the ongoing atrocities in Darfur. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism
1:27

UAE-Backed Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed) Circulates New Video Humiliating Civilians The UAE-backed Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed) circulated a new video this morning showing its fighters insulting and humiliating a large group of unarmed civilians, forcing them to sit on the ground while being made to chant slogans under threat. The militiamen can be heard shouting racist and degrading insults, calling the victims “slaves,” and boasting about entering areas that once belonged to the Sudanese Armed Forces’ 6th Infantry Division. It is still unclear what happened to these civilians after the video was recorded, raising serious fears that they may have been tortured or executed by the militia. This footage reflects the militia’s deeply rooted culture of violence and humiliation, a scene that has been repeated in every city or village it has entered across Darfur and beyond. It also explains why El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, has stood firm for more than 550 days, because its people know that wherever the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed) advances, it tortures, humiliates, and terrorizes the residents of that land. According to military sources, the Sudanese Armed Forces confirmed that some units had tactically repositioned from limited areas around the city while continuing to engage the enemy on other fronts and maintain defensive lines to protect civilians under extremely difficult humanitarian conditions. Meanwhile, the militia released new footage this morning from inside the army garrison in El Fasher in an attempt to create a false image of victory and instill fear among the population. At the same time, hundreds of civilians fled the city toward the Golo area in search of safety, before the terrorist militia deployed a force from the north and surrounded them in the open desert, where gunfire was later heard. This new display of brutality and false propaganda once again exposes the true nature of the UAE-backed Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). It is a terrorist organization that thrives on spreading fear and humiliation, targeting innocent people to intimidate and subdue them. Despite this, the protection of civilians remains an urgent priority and a moral responsibility for the entire international community in the face of the ongoing atrocities in Darfur. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

Sudanese Echo

37,283 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH IRAN - Reporting Window: Last 24 Hours The last 24 hours reinforce the structure that has been developing across the war. Activity remained steady across Iran, Israel, Lebanon, and the Gulf, with no single breakthrough moment but continued pressure applied across every layer of the conflict. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRIKES INSIDE IRAN Strikes continued across multiple areas inside Iran, including Tehran, Shiraz, Kermanshah, and Ahvaz. The targeting profile remains consistent with recent days, focused on systems tied to weapons development and military sustainment. In Tehran, reporting points to continued strikes on military-industrial infrastructure, including: *⃣ Weapons production and research facilities *⃣ Infrastructure around Mehrabad Airport *⃣ Sites linked to Iran’s advanced weapons programs, including SPND-related supply nodes There are also indications that some of these locations had secondary roles, including use by Basij-linked personnel. That aligns with the broader pattern of targeting not just hardware, but the networks that support it. The key point in this 24 hour window is continuity. The same categories of targets are being hit repeatedly, suggesting an effort to ensure these systems are not just damaged, but unable to recover quickly. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN RESPONSE Iran continues to respond. Current intelligence assessments indicate that roughly half of Iran’s missile launchers remain intact, along with a large drone inventory. At the same time, the operational pattern remains limited. Iran is still launching missiles and conducting attacks, but still not at the scale seen earlier in the war. The response appears to rely on: *⃣ Smaller salvos rather than sustained barrages *⃣ Continued willingness to strike civilian-adjacent targets *⃣ Expansion of pressure beyond Israel itself This reflects pressure on launch systems and coordination, not a lack of overall capability. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 LEBANON FRONT The Lebanon front remained active during this window, with both ground and air components continuing. Israeli forces carried out a targeted ground operation in southern Lebanon, resulting in direct engagement with Hezbollah fighters. Reporting indicates: *⃣ Israeli troops pushed deeper into southern لبنان *⃣ Hezbollah operatives were killed in close-quarters combat *⃣ Additional strikes were carried out against infrastructure using air, naval, and ground assets This is consistent with ongoing efforts to shape the immediate border area and reduce launch capability from southern Lebanon. At the same time, the front remains contained geographically, but active in terms of daily engagement. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 GULF AND REGIONAL ACTIVITY Regional expansion continues to be one of the most consistent elements of the war. Over the last 24 hours, Iranian attacks again targeted Gulf infrastructure, including: *⃣ A Kuwaiti oil refinery and desalination facility *⃣ Additional aerial threats across UAE airspace, including ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones *⃣ Civilian injuries linked to interception and debris in the UAE These are functional targets tied to energy and water systems, reinforcing the broader strategy of applying pressure beyond Israel. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚓ STRAIT OF HORMUZ Hormuz remains central to the strategic picture. Developments in this window include: *⃣ Ongoing discussions among multiple countries regarding how to reopen and secure the strait *⃣ Continued Iranian signaling around its ability to influence maritime traffic *⃣ Early indications of mediation channels involving Oman There is no resolution here yet, but the focus on Hormuz is becoming more operational and less theoretical. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ IRAQ Iraq emerged more clearly in this window the last 24 hours as a continued potential point of escalation. The U.S. embassy issued a warning that Iran-aligned militias could conduct attacks in Baghdad within 24 to 48 hours, with potential targets including: *⃣ Diplomatic facilities *⃣ Commercial and infrastructure sites *⃣ Areas frequented by U.S. personnel This aligns with the broader pattern of pressure expanding through proxy channels when direct options are constrained. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW The structure of the war remains stable, but fully active: *⃣ Inside Iran, strikes continue to focus on production and sustainment systems *⃣ Iran retains significant capability, but is operating under constraints *⃣ Lebanon remains an active front with ongoing ground and air operations *⃣ The Gulf is consistently targeted, particularly energy and infrastructure systems *⃣ Iraq is showing early signs of becoming more active through proxy activity ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 MY ASSESSMENT This 24-hour window of time does not introduce a new dynamic. It confirms the current one. Israel is continuing to apply pressure across the systems that allow Iran to produce and coordinate military activity. Iran is continuing to respond within its constraints while expanding pressure across the region where it can. The result is a conflict that is not concentrated in one place, but distributed across multiple active fronts at once. That remains the defining characteristic of the war right now.
0:26

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH IRAN - Reporting Window: Last 24 Hours The last 24 hours reinforce the structure that has been developing across the war. Activity remained steady across Iran, Israel, Lebanon, and the Gulf, with no single breakthrough moment but continued pressure applied across every layer of the conflict. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRIKES INSIDE IRAN Strikes continued across multiple areas inside Iran, including Tehran, Shiraz, Kermanshah, and Ahvaz. The targeting profile remains consistent with recent days, focused on systems tied to weapons development and military sustainment. In Tehran, reporting points to continued strikes on military-industrial infrastructure, including: *⃣ Weapons production and research facilities *⃣ Infrastructure around Mehrabad Airport *⃣ Sites linked to Iran’s advanced weapons programs, including SPND-related supply nodes There are also indications that some of these locations had secondary roles, including use by Basij-linked personnel. That aligns with the broader pattern of targeting not just hardware, but the networks that support it. The key point in this 24 hour window is continuity. The same categories of targets are being hit repeatedly, suggesting an effort to ensure these systems are not just damaged, but unable to recover quickly. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN RESPONSE Iran continues to respond. Current intelligence assessments indicate that roughly half of Iran’s missile launchers remain intact, along with a large drone inventory. At the same time, the operational pattern remains limited. Iran is still launching missiles and conducting attacks, but still not at the scale seen earlier in the war. The response appears to rely on: *⃣ Smaller salvos rather than sustained barrages *⃣ Continued willingness to strike civilian-adjacent targets *⃣ Expansion of pressure beyond Israel itself This reflects pressure on launch systems and coordination, not a lack of overall capability. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 LEBANON FRONT The Lebanon front remained active during this window, with both ground and air components continuing. Israeli forces carried out a targeted ground operation in southern Lebanon, resulting in direct engagement with Hezbollah fighters. Reporting indicates: *⃣ Israeli troops pushed deeper into southern لبنان *⃣ Hezbollah operatives were killed in close-quarters combat *⃣ Additional strikes were carried out against infrastructure using air, naval, and ground assets This is consistent with ongoing efforts to shape the immediate border area and reduce launch capability from southern Lebanon. At the same time, the front remains contained geographically, but active in terms of daily engagement. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 GULF AND REGIONAL ACTIVITY Regional expansion continues to be one of the most consistent elements of the war. Over the last 24 hours, Iranian attacks again targeted Gulf infrastructure, including: *⃣ A Kuwaiti oil refinery and desalination facility *⃣ Additional aerial threats across UAE airspace, including ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones *⃣ Civilian injuries linked to interception and debris in the UAE These are functional targets tied to energy and water systems, reinforcing the broader strategy of applying pressure beyond Israel. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚓ STRAIT OF HORMUZ Hormuz remains central to the strategic picture. Developments in this window include: *⃣ Ongoing discussions among multiple countries regarding how to reopen and secure the strait *⃣ Continued Iranian signaling around its ability to influence maritime traffic *⃣ Early indications of mediation channels involving Oman There is no resolution here yet, but the focus on Hormuz is becoming more operational and less theoretical. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ IRAQ Iraq emerged more clearly in this window the last 24 hours as a continued potential point of escalation. The U.S. embassy issued a warning that Iran-aligned militias could conduct attacks in Baghdad within 24 to 48 hours, with potential targets including: *⃣ Diplomatic facilities *⃣ Commercial and infrastructure sites *⃣ Areas frequented by U.S. personnel This aligns with the broader pattern of pressure expanding through proxy channels when direct options are constrained. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW The structure of the war remains stable, but fully active: *⃣ Inside Iran, strikes continue to focus on production and sustainment systems *⃣ Iran retains significant capability, but is operating under constraints *⃣ Lebanon remains an active front with ongoing ground and air operations *⃣ The Gulf is consistently targeted, particularly energy and infrastructure systems *⃣ Iraq is showing early signs of becoming more active through proxy activity ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 MY ASSESSMENT This 24-hour window of time does not introduce a new dynamic. It confirms the current one. Israel is continuing to apply pressure across the systems that allow Iran to produce and coordinate military activity. Iran is continuing to respond within its constraints while expanding pressure across the region where it can. The result is a conflict that is not concentrated in one place, but distributed across multiple active fronts at once. That remains the defining characteristic of the war right now.

Inside_Israel_Intel

49,879 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Republic of Balochistan’s Open Joint Letter to the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China Urging an End to Military Assistance and Financial Aid to Pakistan To: The Honorable Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America and His Excellency Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China 15 August, 2026 Pakistan’s military establishment has lied to the world and deliberately spread disinformation by denying the air strikes carried out in Surab on 12 August 2026, which resulted in the killing of 30 innocent Baloch civilians, including women and children. Pakistan’s lies are nothing new. Its military establishment previously misled the three U.S. administrations of George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump regarding the presence and activities of Osama bin Laden. Pakistan is also misleading China about the grim situation in Balochistan and about the CPEC (China Pakistan Economic Corridor), where Pakistan’s own military is unable to travel by road after 6 p.m. Pakistan has lost ground control across Balochistan. Now, Islamabad’s military is deliberately targeting Baloch civilians by conducting air strike using US and Chinese produced fighter Jets and technology. The Trump administration must not trust Pakistan or provide relief to its corrupt and terrorist state, which supports terrorism and has been involved in the killing of thousands of U.S. servicemen in Afghanistan. in post 9/11. The Republic of Balochistan urges the United States to reconsider its longstanding military assistance to Pakistan. Under the Peace Gate I and II programs, Washington provided Pakistan with 40 F-16A/B fighters between 1983 and 1987. In 2006, the United States approved a further package including 18 F-16C/D Block 52s, modernization of 34 existing F-16s under the MLU program, AIM-120C missiles, and maintenance, technical, and engine-support assistance, with the broader package valued at approximately $5 billion. These capabilities must not be used against Baloch civilians. China has likewise provided Pakistan with extensive military assistance since the 1960s, including approximately 165 MiG-19 fighters and other weapons and equipment valued at around $200 million by the early 1970s. These aircraft were used against the Balochistan freedom movement in Kohistan Marri and Jhalawan. China later became Pakistan’s principal defense partner, supplying F-7s, A-5s, K-8s, missiles, naval systems, and the jointly developed JF-17 Thunder. In 2015, China agreed to supply Pakistan with eight Yuan-class submarines in a deal reportedly worth approximately $5 billion. The Republic of Balochistan urges Beijing to ensure that its military assistance and technology are not used to suppress the homegrown liberation movement of Balochistan. The Republic of Balochistan urges the United States to reconsider its longstanding military assistance to Pakistan. Under the Peace Gate I and II programs, Washington provided Pakistan with 40 F-16A/B fighters between 1983 and 1987. In 2006, the United States approved a further package including 18 F-16C/D Block 52s, modernization of 34 existing F-16s under the MLU program, AIM-120C missiles, and maintenance, technical, and engine-support assistance, with the broader package valued at approximately $5 billion. These capabilities must not be used against Baloch civilians. China has likewise provided Pakistan with extensive military assistance since the 1960s, including approximately 165 MiG-19 fighters and other weapons and equipment valued at around $200 million by the early 1970s. These aircraft were used against the Balochistan freedom movement in Kohistan Marri and Jhalawan. China later became Pakistan’s principal defense partner, supplying F-7s, A-5s, K-8s, missiles, naval systems, and the jointly developed JF-17 Thunder. In 2015, China agreed to supply Pakistan with eight Yuan-class submarines in a deal reportedly worth approximately $5 billion. The Republic of Balochistan urges Beijing to ensure that its military assistance and technology are not used to suppress the homegrown liberation movement of Balochistan. For decades, successive Pakistani governments and military administrations have possessed and employed military equipment, aircraft, weapons, technology, and logistical capabilities obtained primerily from foreign partners in offensive operations and state terrorism against the Baloch nation. The Republic of Balochistan maintains that Pakistan and Balochistan are separate nations and that Pakistan has no legitimate authority over Balochistan’s territory, sea and air space. The Republic therefore urges the United States and China two of the world’s most powerful states and permanent members of the UNSC (United Nations Security Council) to recognize the consequences of continuing military assistance to the rogue state of Pakistan, particularly where such assistance is being massively utilized against Baloch civilians. We are deeply concerned by video footage and reports showing Pakistan Air Force air strikes recently in the Surab area of Balochistan in which civilians, including women and children, are massacred. The Republic of Balochistan regards attacks deliberately directed against civilians as grave violations of international humanitarian law and, where established by the facts, as acts that fall within the legal definition of war crimes. The Republic of Balochistan further emphasizes that it is not opposed to legitimate international investment, economic cooperation, trade, or development. However, if the United States, China, or any other state seeks access to Balochistan’s natural resources, infrastructure, ports, air bases, critical minerals, energy, or markets, such engagement should take place through dialogue with only the Baloch people and their legitimate political representatives not through military, financial, or technological support for invading entity of Pakistan. If foreign governments provide Pakistan with military capabilities while simultaneously pursuing economic interests in Balochistan, the Republic considers this unacceptable and calls for an immediate reassessment of such policies. No external power should be permitted, in our view, to use military assistance to strengthen the occupational forces of Pakistan in a disputed political conflict while simultaneously benefiting from the territory and resources of the Republic of Balochistan. The Republic of Balochistan therefore calls upon Washington and Beijing to stop providing military assistance that could contribute to violations against Baloch civilians, establish transparent mechanisms to ensure that transferred weapons and aircraft are not used to suppress the homegrown liberation movement and against civilian populations. We further urge international community and our immediate neighbours to formally recognize Balochistan as a free and sovereign country and to pursue trade, investment, defense, and other relations with the Baloch people on the basis of political dialogue, mutual respect, economic partnership, and the principles of international law rather than through military support to the roque state of Pakistan. THE REPUBLIC OF BALOCHISTAN Donald J. Trump Hyrbyair Marri Secretary Marco Rubio Marco Rubio The White House U.S. Central Command People's Daily, China CHINA MFA Spokesperson 中国外交部发言人
2:51

The Republic of Balochistan’s Open Joint Letter to the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China Urging an End to Military Assistance and Financial Aid to Pakistan To: The Honorable Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America and His Excellency Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China 15 August, 2026 Pakistan’s military establishment has lied to the world and deliberately spread disinformation by denying the air strikes carried out in Surab on 12 August 2026, which resulted in the killing of 30 innocent Baloch civilians, including women and children. Pakistan’s lies are nothing new. Its military establishment previously misled the three U.S. administrations of George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump regarding the presence and activities of Osama bin Laden. Pakistan is also misleading China about the grim situation in Balochistan and about the CPEC (China Pakistan Economic Corridor), where Pakistan’s own military is unable to travel by road after 6 p.m. Pakistan has lost ground control across Balochistan. Now, Islamabad’s military is deliberately targeting Baloch civilians by conducting air strike using US and Chinese produced fighter Jets and technology. The Trump administration must not trust Pakistan or provide relief to its corrupt and terrorist state, which supports terrorism and has been involved in the killing of thousands of U.S. servicemen in Afghanistan. in post 9/11. The Republic of Balochistan urges the United States to reconsider its longstanding military assistance to Pakistan. Under the Peace Gate I and II programs, Washington provided Pakistan with 40 F-16A/B fighters between 1983 and 1987. In 2006, the United States approved a further package including 18 F-16C/D Block 52s, modernization of 34 existing F-16s under the MLU program, AIM-120C missiles, and maintenance, technical, and engine-support assistance, with the broader package valued at approximately $5 billion. These capabilities must not be used against Baloch civilians. China has likewise provided Pakistan with extensive military assistance since the 1960s, including approximately 165 MiG-19 fighters and other weapons and equipment valued at around $200 million by the early 1970s. These aircraft were used against the Balochistan freedom movement in Kohistan Marri and Jhalawan. China later became Pakistan’s principal defense partner, supplying F-7s, A-5s, K-8s, missiles, naval systems, and the jointly developed JF-17 Thunder. In 2015, China agreed to supply Pakistan with eight Yuan-class submarines in a deal reportedly worth approximately $5 billion. The Republic of Balochistan urges Beijing to ensure that its military assistance and technology are not used to suppress the homegrown liberation movement of Balochistan. The Republic of Balochistan urges the United States to reconsider its longstanding military assistance to Pakistan. Under the Peace Gate I and II programs, Washington provided Pakistan with 40 F-16A/B fighters between 1983 and 1987. In 2006, the United States approved a further package including 18 F-16C/D Block 52s, modernization of 34 existing F-16s under the MLU program, AIM-120C missiles, and maintenance, technical, and engine-support assistance, with the broader package valued at approximately $5 billion. These capabilities must not be used against Baloch civilians. China has likewise provided Pakistan with extensive military assistance since the 1960s, including approximately 165 MiG-19 fighters and other weapons and equipment valued at around $200 million by the early 1970s. These aircraft were used against the Balochistan freedom movement in Kohistan Marri and Jhalawan. China later became Pakistan’s principal defense partner, supplying F-7s, A-5s, K-8s, missiles, naval systems, and the jointly developed JF-17 Thunder. In 2015, China agreed to supply Pakistan with eight Yuan-class submarines in a deal reportedly worth approximately $5 billion. The Republic of Balochistan urges Beijing to ensure that its military assistance and technology are not used to suppress the homegrown liberation movement of Balochistan. For decades, successive Pakistani governments and military administrations have possessed and employed military equipment, aircraft, weapons, technology, and logistical capabilities obtained primerily from foreign partners in offensive operations and state terrorism against the Baloch nation. The Republic of Balochistan maintains that Pakistan and Balochistan are separate nations and that Pakistan has no legitimate authority over Balochistan’s territory, sea and air space. The Republic therefore urges the United States and China two of the world’s most powerful states and permanent members of the UNSC (United Nations Security Council) to recognize the consequences of continuing military assistance to the rogue state of Pakistan, particularly where such assistance is being massively utilized against Baloch civilians. We are deeply concerned by video footage and reports showing Pakistan Air Force air strikes recently in the Surab area of Balochistan in which civilians, including women and children, are massacred. The Republic of Balochistan regards attacks deliberately directed against civilians as grave violations of international humanitarian law and, where established by the facts, as acts that fall within the legal definition of war crimes. The Republic of Balochistan further emphasizes that it is not opposed to legitimate international investment, economic cooperation, trade, or development. However, if the United States, China, or any other state seeks access to Balochistan’s natural resources, infrastructure, ports, air bases, critical minerals, energy, or markets, such engagement should take place through dialogue with only the Baloch people and their legitimate political representatives not through military, financial, or technological support for invading entity of Pakistan. If foreign governments provide Pakistan with military capabilities while simultaneously pursuing economic interests in Balochistan, the Republic considers this unacceptable and calls for an immediate reassessment of such policies. No external power should be permitted, in our view, to use military assistance to strengthen the occupational forces of Pakistan in a disputed political conflict while simultaneously benefiting from the territory and resources of the Republic of Balochistan. The Republic of Balochistan therefore calls upon Washington and Beijing to stop providing military assistance that could contribute to violations against Baloch civilians, establish transparent mechanisms to ensure that transferred weapons and aircraft are not used to suppress the homegrown liberation movement and against civilian populations. We further urge international community and our immediate neighbours to formally recognize Balochistan as a free and sovereign country and to pursue trade, investment, defense, and other relations with the Baloch people on the basis of political dialogue, mutual respect, economic partnership, and the principles of international law rather than through military support to the roque state of Pakistan. THE REPUBLIC OF BALOCHISTAN Donald J. Trump Hyrbyair Marri Secretary Marco Rubio Marco Rubio The White House U.S. Central Command People's Daily, China CHINA MFA Spokesperson 中国外交部发言人

Mir Yar Baloch

20,675 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

🚨🚨🚨 The Chinese military has simulated battles near Mexico and Cuba during a wargaming exercise — revealed toward the end of a report aired on state television CCTV on Dec 19 (lower right video; CCTV seems to have taken down the original video from its website but I’ve managed to stitch together one that’s practically the same except some on-screen captions.) Cuba, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, along with the Sea of Okhotsk and Taiwan, were among the locations of conflict scenarios visible on screens in the report showing PLA wargaming exercises. Despite closer economic ties with countries in the region, China has a minimal military presence in Latin America. But the fact that the PLA is modelling potential conflicts there suggests a shift in the Chinese military’s global ambitions. One screen in the report showed red and blue opposing unit “indicators” — represented by aircraft and ships — manoeuvring near the coasts of Cuba and Mexico. Some of the blue side congregated near Houston, Texas, and headed southeast into the Gulf of Mexico, while the red side was seen in the Caribbean Sea. In a typical PLA drill, the red side usually represents the Chinese military while the blue side is the enemy. During the CCTV report, a close-up focused on Cuba showed the lines of trajectory of aircraft and ships in the region in what was likely a simulation of a tactical operation. Chinese researchers were seen pointing to the screen and discussing the situation. The footage was recorded at a PLA wargaming event held in Xuchang, Henan province, which was attended by 20 units from across the military and its academies. Dozens of simulation systems were demonstrated — all of them developed in China. The report did not provide further information about any of the conflict scenarios. In another map seen in the report, the red side was shown clustered near Russia’s far eastern coast while blue indicators were positioned over Hokkaido in Japan and the disputed Kuril Islands. Taiwan also featured at the center of a map in one of the wargaming systems shown in the report. Beijing sees the self-governed island as part of China, to be reunited by force if necessary. Most countries, including the United States, do not see Taiwan as an independent state, but many oppose any forcible change to the status quo. Washington is also committed to supplying Taiwan with weapons for its defense. With tensions rising in the region in recent years, the PLA has held frequent exercises around Taiwan and also conducted joint training with Russia in the Sea of Okhotsk and the Sea of Japan. The Chinese and Russian air forces held a joint patrol earlier this month, with two Russian Tu-95 bombers flying across the Sea of Japan to join two Chinese H-6 bombers over the East China Sea. That came after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi enraged Beijing by suggesting last month that Japan could intervene militarily in the event of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait. The CCTV report also showed the PLA simulating an air battle between Chinese J-16 fighters and French-made Rafale fighter jets. Details of PLA war games are rarely revealed – they are usually highly classified. According to the CCTV report, the wargaming event aimed to “help commanders learn how to fight without engaging in actual combat by creating a low-cost, immersive and repeatable adversarial environment”. It said the PLA’s wargaming systems covered land, sea, air, space and electromagnetic domains, with integrated cutting-edge technologies such as AI-powered models, big data analytics and real-time simulation engines.
7:26

🚨🚨🚨 The Chinese military has simulated battles near Mexico and Cuba during a wargaming exercise — revealed toward the end of a report aired on state television CCTV on Dec 19 (lower right video; CCTV seems to have taken down the original video from its website but I’ve managed to stitch together one that’s practically the same except some on-screen captions.) Cuba, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, along with the Sea of Okhotsk and Taiwan, were among the locations of conflict scenarios visible on screens in the report showing PLA wargaming exercises. Despite closer economic ties with countries in the region, China has a minimal military presence in Latin America. But the fact that the PLA is modelling potential conflicts there suggests a shift in the Chinese military’s global ambitions. One screen in the report showed red and blue opposing unit “indicators” — represented by aircraft and ships — manoeuvring near the coasts of Cuba and Mexico. Some of the blue side congregated near Houston, Texas, and headed southeast into the Gulf of Mexico, while the red side was seen in the Caribbean Sea. In a typical PLA drill, the red side usually represents the Chinese military while the blue side is the enemy. During the CCTV report, a close-up focused on Cuba showed the lines of trajectory of aircraft and ships in the region in what was likely a simulation of a tactical operation. Chinese researchers were seen pointing to the screen and discussing the situation. The footage was recorded at a PLA wargaming event held in Xuchang, Henan province, which was attended by 20 units from across the military and its academies. Dozens of simulation systems were demonstrated — all of them developed in China. The report did not provide further information about any of the conflict scenarios. In another map seen in the report, the red side was shown clustered near Russia’s far eastern coast while blue indicators were positioned over Hokkaido in Japan and the disputed Kuril Islands. Taiwan also featured at the center of a map in one of the wargaming systems shown in the report. Beijing sees the self-governed island as part of China, to be reunited by force if necessary. Most countries, including the United States, do not see Taiwan as an independent state, but many oppose any forcible change to the status quo. Washington is also committed to supplying Taiwan with weapons for its defense. With tensions rising in the region in recent years, the PLA has held frequent exercises around Taiwan and also conducted joint training with Russia in the Sea of Okhotsk and the Sea of Japan. The Chinese and Russian air forces held a joint patrol earlier this month, with two Russian Tu-95 bombers flying across the Sea of Japan to join two Chinese H-6 bombers over the East China Sea. That came after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi enraged Beijing by suggesting last month that Japan could intervene militarily in the event of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait. The CCTV report also showed the PLA simulating an air battle between Chinese J-16 fighters and French-made Rafale fighter jets. Details of PLA war games are rarely revealed – they are usually highly classified. According to the CCTV report, the wargaming event aimed to “help commanders learn how to fight without engaging in actual combat by creating a low-cost, immersive and repeatable adversarial environment”. It said the PLA’s wargaming systems covered land, sea, air, space and electromagnetic domains, with integrated cutting-edge technologies such as AI-powered models, big data analytics and real-time simulation engines.

Byron Wan

94,229 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: 3/11 to 3/12 • Iran widened pressure on the Gulf energy system, with tankers hit near Basra, a container vessel struck near the UAE, and fuel infrastructure targeted in Bahrain and Oman, sending oil back above $100. • Israel expanded its campaign inside Iran, striking IRGC command infrastructure, missile production sites, and drone launch networks in and around Tehran. • Hezbollah launched one of its largest rocket barrages of the war, triggering heavy Israeli strikes on command centers and weapons infrastructure in Beirut’s southern suburbs. • Iranian proxies and aligned forces continued attacks on U.S. positions across the region, bringing the total number of incidents targeting American sites or personnel to at least 25 since the war began. The central story of the last 24 hours is that the conflict is increasingly moving beyond the battlefield and into the systems that keep the region functioning. Iran continues to pressure shipping, energy infrastructure, and U.S. positions across the Middle East, while Israel is pushing deeper into the regime’s military and security architecture. The result is a war that now looks less like a contained exchange of strikes and more like a widening struggle over the region’s economic stability, military balance, and internal political control. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ PERSIAN GULF: IRAN CONTINUES TO PRESSURE THE ENERGY SYSTEM The Persian Gulf remained the most strategically significant theater over the last 24 hours. Multiple reports confirmed additional attacks affecting shipping and energy infrastructure across the region. Two oil tankers were reported burning in Iraqi waters near Basra after earlier strikes on vessels in the Gulf, while another container ship was reportedly hit near the UAE. Fuel and logistics infrastructure also came under pressure. Bahraini authorities reported that Iranian aggression targeted fuel tanks at a facility in Muharraq near Bahrain International Airport, while additional reports indicated that oil storage facilities at Oman’s Port of Salalah were struck. These attacks reinforce a clear pattern: Iran may not be able to fully close the Strait of Hormuz, but it is demonstrating that it can disrupt the broader logistical network surrounding the Gulf’s energy system. The market reaction was immediate. Oil prices moved back above $100 despite coordinated moves by the United States and its partners to release large volumes from strategic petroleum reserves. The International Energy Agency and several governments have moved to inject supply into the market, but these measures are temporary buffers. As long as shipping through the Gulf remains at risk, the global energy market will continue to price in disruption. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ TEHRAN: THE CAMPAIGN IS NOW HITTING THE REGIME’S CORE SECURITY NETWORK The latest strike waves inside Iran appear to be moving beyond general bombardment and toward a systematic dismantling of the regime’s security infrastructure. Israeli strikes reportedly targeted the IRGC Air Force headquarters in Tehran, ballistic missile storage and production facilities, Basij paramilitary command centers, and a compound at Imam Hossein University that functions as an operational hub for the Revolutionary Guards. Additional strikes were reported against Iranian intelligence ministry facilities and internal security infrastructure, indicating that the campaign is beginning to focus not only on missile capability but on the regime’s ability to control events inside the country. Separate strikes in western Iran reportedly hit drone launch teams preparing attacks toward Israel, suggesting that launch infrastructure is now being targeted dynamically as it emerges rather than only through preplanned strikes against fixed installations. Satellite imagery also confirmed damage to Iranian F-14 fighter aircraft at Isfahan’s 8th Tactical Air Base, further degrading an already aging Iranian air force that has struggled to contest Israeli and U.S. air superiority throughout the conflict. Taken together, the targeting pattern suggests that the coalition is increasingly focusing on the regime’s operational nervous system: command networks, launch infrastructure, and internal security forces that allow the government to coordinate and sustain military operations. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ LEBANON: ISRAEL IS NOW TARGETING HEZBOLLAH’S OPERATIONAL COMMAND STRUCTURE The northern front also escalated sharply over the last 24 hours. Hezbollah launched one of its largest barrages of the war, firing large numbers of rockets and drones toward northern Israel in coordinated strikes linked to Iran’s broader regional campaign. Israel’s response focused heavily on Hezbollah’s command and operational infrastructure rather than simply retaliating against launch sites. Israeli aircraft struck multiple facilities in Beirut’s southern suburbs (Dahieh), including command centers, operational headquarters, and weapons storage sites linked to Hezbollah’s Radwan forces, the elite unit responsible for cross-border operations against Israel. Additional strikes targeted missile launch infrastructure and militant positions across southern Lebanon, as well as logistical sites used to support ongoing rocket attacks. The concentration of strikes in Dahieh is significant. The area functions as Hezbollah’s central military and intelligence hub, and repeated attacks there suggest Israel is attempting to disrupt the group’s command-and-control structure rather than merely suppress individual launch cells. This shift indicates that the northern theater may be entering a new phase where Israel seeks to systematically degrade Hezbollah’s operational leadership and coordination networks, not just reduce the immediate rocket threat. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ REGIONAL SPILLOVER: U.S. POSITIONS AND GLOBAL SECURITY CONCERNS Regional spillover continues to grow. Iranian proxies and aligned groups have carried out repeated attacks targeting American facilities or sites hosting U.S. personnel across the Middle East. Analysts now count at least 25 attacks targeting U.S. sites or locations housing American personnel since the war began. One of the most significant recent incidents involved a drone strike on a large U.S. diplomatic facility near Baghdad International Airport. The attack caused damage but did not produce casualties, and U.S. officials suspect it was carried out by Iranian-aligned militias operating in Iraq. Beyond the Middle East itself, intelligence warnings suggest the conflict could reach further. U.S. authorities have warned about potential Iranian retaliation targeting American interests abroad, including scenarios involving drone launches from maritime platforms. Cyber activity linked to Iran has also been detected in Europe, including an attempted attack on a nuclear research facility in Poland that officials say bears multiple indicators of Iranian involvement. These developments show that while the war’s kinetic center remains in the Middle East, the broader confrontation between Iran and its adversaries is beginning to manifest across multiple domains: military, cyber, and economic. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW The key takeaway from the past 24 hours is that the war is continuing to widen in practice even as some political messaging suggests it could be nearing a conclusion. Iran is still capable of imposing meaningful costs through attacks on shipping, energy infrastructure, and proxy operations across the region. Israel, meanwhile, is expanding its strike campaign into deeper layers of Iran’s military and security architecture while escalating pressure on Hezbollah in Lebanon. Neither side appears close to a decisive breakthrough. Iran’s leadership structure remains intact despite heavy strikes, and its network of proxies continues to generate pressure across multiple fronts. At the same time, Israel and the United States retain overwhelming military superiority and appear committed to degrading Iran’s ability to sustain a prolonged conflict. For now, the trajectory remains clear: the war is evolving from a direct exchange of strikes into a broader contest over the region’s economic stability, military balance, and political future. --------------------------------- END REPORT
0:17

🚨OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: 3/11 to 3/12 • Iran widened pressure on the Gulf energy system, with tankers hit near Basra, a container vessel struck near the UAE, and fuel infrastructure targeted in Bahrain and Oman, sending oil back above $100. • Israel expanded its campaign inside Iran, striking IRGC command infrastructure, missile production sites, and drone launch networks in and around Tehran. • Hezbollah launched one of its largest rocket barrages of the war, triggering heavy Israeli strikes on command centers and weapons infrastructure in Beirut’s southern suburbs. • Iranian proxies and aligned forces continued attacks on U.S. positions across the region, bringing the total number of incidents targeting American sites or personnel to at least 25 since the war began. The central story of the last 24 hours is that the conflict is increasingly moving beyond the battlefield and into the systems that keep the region functioning. Iran continues to pressure shipping, energy infrastructure, and U.S. positions across the Middle East, while Israel is pushing deeper into the regime’s military and security architecture. The result is a war that now looks less like a contained exchange of strikes and more like a widening struggle over the region’s economic stability, military balance, and internal political control. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ PERSIAN GULF: IRAN CONTINUES TO PRESSURE THE ENERGY SYSTEM The Persian Gulf remained the most strategically significant theater over the last 24 hours. Multiple reports confirmed additional attacks affecting shipping and energy infrastructure across the region. Two oil tankers were reported burning in Iraqi waters near Basra after earlier strikes on vessels in the Gulf, while another container ship was reportedly hit near the UAE. Fuel and logistics infrastructure also came under pressure. Bahraini authorities reported that Iranian aggression targeted fuel tanks at a facility in Muharraq near Bahrain International Airport, while additional reports indicated that oil storage facilities at Oman’s Port of Salalah were struck. These attacks reinforce a clear pattern: Iran may not be able to fully close the Strait of Hormuz, but it is demonstrating that it can disrupt the broader logistical network surrounding the Gulf’s energy system. The market reaction was immediate. Oil prices moved back above $100 despite coordinated moves by the United States and its partners to release large volumes from strategic petroleum reserves. The International Energy Agency and several governments have moved to inject supply into the market, but these measures are temporary buffers. As long as shipping through the Gulf remains at risk, the global energy market will continue to price in disruption. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ TEHRAN: THE CAMPAIGN IS NOW HITTING THE REGIME’S CORE SECURITY NETWORK The latest strike waves inside Iran appear to be moving beyond general bombardment and toward a systematic dismantling of the regime’s security infrastructure. Israeli strikes reportedly targeted the IRGC Air Force headquarters in Tehran, ballistic missile storage and production facilities, Basij paramilitary command centers, and a compound at Imam Hossein University that functions as an operational hub for the Revolutionary Guards. Additional strikes were reported against Iranian intelligence ministry facilities and internal security infrastructure, indicating that the campaign is beginning to focus not only on missile capability but on the regime’s ability to control events inside the country. Separate strikes in western Iran reportedly hit drone launch teams preparing attacks toward Israel, suggesting that launch infrastructure is now being targeted dynamically as it emerges rather than only through preplanned strikes against fixed installations. Satellite imagery also confirmed damage to Iranian F-14 fighter aircraft at Isfahan’s 8th Tactical Air Base, further degrading an already aging Iranian air force that has struggled to contest Israeli and U.S. air superiority throughout the conflict. Taken together, the targeting pattern suggests that the coalition is increasingly focusing on the regime’s operational nervous system: command networks, launch infrastructure, and internal security forces that allow the government to coordinate and sustain military operations. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ LEBANON: ISRAEL IS NOW TARGETING HEZBOLLAH’S OPERATIONAL COMMAND STRUCTURE The northern front also escalated sharply over the last 24 hours. Hezbollah launched one of its largest barrages of the war, firing large numbers of rockets and drones toward northern Israel in coordinated strikes linked to Iran’s broader regional campaign. Israel’s response focused heavily on Hezbollah’s command and operational infrastructure rather than simply retaliating against launch sites. Israeli aircraft struck multiple facilities in Beirut’s southern suburbs (Dahieh), including command centers, operational headquarters, and weapons storage sites linked to Hezbollah’s Radwan forces, the elite unit responsible for cross-border operations against Israel. Additional strikes targeted missile launch infrastructure and militant positions across southern Lebanon, as well as logistical sites used to support ongoing rocket attacks. The concentration of strikes in Dahieh is significant. The area functions as Hezbollah’s central military and intelligence hub, and repeated attacks there suggest Israel is attempting to disrupt the group’s command-and-control structure rather than merely suppress individual launch cells. This shift indicates that the northern theater may be entering a new phase where Israel seeks to systematically degrade Hezbollah’s operational leadership and coordination networks, not just reduce the immediate rocket threat. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ REGIONAL SPILLOVER: U.S. POSITIONS AND GLOBAL SECURITY CONCERNS Regional spillover continues to grow. Iranian proxies and aligned groups have carried out repeated attacks targeting American facilities or sites hosting U.S. personnel across the Middle East. Analysts now count at least 25 attacks targeting U.S. sites or locations housing American personnel since the war began. One of the most significant recent incidents involved a drone strike on a large U.S. diplomatic facility near Baghdad International Airport. The attack caused damage but did not produce casualties, and U.S. officials suspect it was carried out by Iranian-aligned militias operating in Iraq. Beyond the Middle East itself, intelligence warnings suggest the conflict could reach further. U.S. authorities have warned about potential Iranian retaliation targeting American interests abroad, including scenarios involving drone launches from maritime platforms. Cyber activity linked to Iran has also been detected in Europe, including an attempted attack on a nuclear research facility in Poland that officials say bears multiple indicators of Iranian involvement. These developments show that while the war’s kinetic center remains in the Middle East, the broader confrontation between Iran and its adversaries is beginning to manifest across multiple domains: military, cyber, and economic. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ *⃣ WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW The key takeaway from the past 24 hours is that the war is continuing to widen in practice even as some political messaging suggests it could be nearing a conclusion. Iran is still capable of imposing meaningful costs through attacks on shipping, energy infrastructure, and proxy operations across the region. Israel, meanwhile, is expanding its strike campaign into deeper layers of Iran’s military and security architecture while escalating pressure on Hezbollah in Lebanon. Neither side appears close to a decisive breakthrough. Iran’s leadership structure remains intact despite heavy strikes, and its network of proxies continues to generate pressure across multiple fronts. At the same time, Israel and the United States retain overwhelming military superiority and appear committed to degrading Iran’s ability to sustain a prolonged conflict. For now, the trajectory remains clear: the war is evolving from a direct exchange of strikes into a broader contest over the region’s economic stability, military balance, and political future. --------------------------------- END REPORT

Inside_Israel_Intel

30,124 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: 3/9 - 3/10 • Hezbollah fighting intensifies around Khiam in southern Lebanon • Iranian cluster warhead missile kills one civilian in central Israel • Bahrain refinery strike triggers force majeure amid Gulf escalation • Oil briefly spikes toward $120 as Hormuz threats escalate The last 24 hours did not bring de-escalation. Instead they clarified the next phase of the war. Israel and the United States continue pressing deeper into Iran’s military infrastructure while Iran attempts to widen the battlefield through Hezbollah, Gulf energy pressure, and regional instability. The result is a war that may involve smaller missile salvos than the opening days, but is becoming broader, more economically strategic, and more dangerous regionally. Below is the operational picture. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRATEGIC AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN Israeli and U.S. strikes continued targeting military and strategic infrastructure inside Iran. Recent targets reportedly included: • missile infrastructure near Tehran • military aviation sites around Mehrabad Airport • IRGC logistical facilities • missile production and sustainment infrastructure Large explosions and fires were again reported near Tehran and around Mehrabad. But the most important shift is strategic, not tactical. The campaign increasingly appears aimed at preventing Iran from regenerating missile capability, not just destroying launchers currently in use. If the opening phase of the war was about suppressing immediate missile attacks, the current phase looks more like a systematic attempt to dismantle the infrastructure required for Iran to rebuild those forces. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN MISSILE ATTACKS ON ISRAEL Iran continued launching missiles toward Israel over the last 24 hours. However, the pattern of attacks continues to evolve. Recent observations indicate: • roughly 6–8 missile waves during the day • smaller salvos than earlier in the war • cluster munitions used to widen impact areas The most serious incident occurred when an Iranian cluster warhead missile struck central Israel, killing one person and injuring others. Cluster warheads disperse multiple submunitions over a wide area, meaning even a single missile can create several impact zones. Salvo trend: Early phase of the war • large coordinated barrages • dozens of missiles launched simultaneously Current phase • smaller groups of missiles • more frequent launch windows • cluster payloads increasing damage footprint This suggests Iran still retains strike capability, but the launcher network enabling large barrages is likely under increasing pressure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚔️ THE LEBANON FRONT: KHIAM BECOMES A FLASHPOINT The most notable battlefield development of the last 24 hours came from southern Lebanon. Fighting around the border town of Khiam intensified, with Hezbollah claiming direct hits on multiple Israeli Merkava tanks during clashes. While battlefield claims remain contested in real time, the fighting represents closer-range contact than most of the cross-border exchanges seen earlier in the war. Israel also confirmed the death of a second soldier in Hezbollah fighting in southern Lebanon. At the same time, Israel continued strikes on Hezbollah command centers and the Al Qard al Hassan financial network, which is used to fund Hezbollah activity. Why this matters: This front is no longer limited to rockets and airstrikes. It is increasingly showing signs of direct tactical engagement. That makes Lebanon potentially the most dangerous front of the war right now. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 IRAN IS PUSHING THE WAR INTO THE GULF Iran continues attempting to export the war into the broader region. The most significant development was a drone strike on Bahrain’s Bapco refinery, which forced the facility to declare force majeure on shipments. The refinery disruption followed earlier damage to desalination infrastructure in Bahrain. At the same time: • drone and missile alerts continued in Saudi Arabia and the UAE • Gulf air defenses remained active across multiple states Iran has also issued explicit threats regarding oil exports and the Strait of Hormuz, declaring that if the war continues it could prevent oil shipments from leaving the region. This reflects a clear Iranian strategy: If Tehran cannot win militarily, it will attempt to raise the economic cost of the war globally. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📉 GLOBAL MARKETS REACT Energy markets responded immediately to the Gulf escalation. Oil prices briefly surged toward $120 per barrel, reflecting fears that attacks on Gulf infrastructure or shipping lanes could disrupt global energy supply. Even when prices later stabilized, markets made clear they now see the Iran war as a systemic energy risk, not just a regional conflict. That gives Tehran a potential leverage point. Iran’s leadership appears to believe that threatening global energy stability could pressure Western governments to push for a ceasefire. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 THE WAR IS SPREADING ALONG THE PERIPHERY Beyond Iran and Israel, several additional fronts remain active. Recent developments include: • strikes on pro-Iranian militia positions in Iraq • tensions involving Kurdish regions near the Iran-Iraq border • diplomatic reactions following attacks on Gulf states The pattern increasingly resembles a regional pressure network, rather than a single bilateral war. Iran does not need every proxy front to win. It only needs enough instability across multiple fronts to complicate U.S. and Israeli strategy. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW Three developments define the war in the past 24 hours. 1️⃣ The Lebanon front may now be the most dangerous battlefield. The fighting around Khiam suggests Hezbollah is capable of imposing real tactical costs. 2️⃣ Iran is expanding the conflict through energy and Gulf instability. Strikes on refineries and desalination infrastructure show Tehran’s willingness to escalate economically. 3️⃣ The air campaign is shifting toward long-term denial of Iran’s missile capability. Israel and the U.S. appear increasingly focused on preventing Iran from rebuilding its strike infrastructure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ END OF REPORT
0:20

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: 3/9 - 3/10 • Hezbollah fighting intensifies around Khiam in southern Lebanon • Iranian cluster warhead missile kills one civilian in central Israel • Bahrain refinery strike triggers force majeure amid Gulf escalation • Oil briefly spikes toward $120 as Hormuz threats escalate The last 24 hours did not bring de-escalation. Instead they clarified the next phase of the war. Israel and the United States continue pressing deeper into Iran’s military infrastructure while Iran attempts to widen the battlefield through Hezbollah, Gulf energy pressure, and regional instability. The result is a war that may involve smaller missile salvos than the opening days, but is becoming broader, more economically strategic, and more dangerous regionally. Below is the operational picture. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ STRATEGIC AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN Israeli and U.S. strikes continued targeting military and strategic infrastructure inside Iran. Recent targets reportedly included: • missile infrastructure near Tehran • military aviation sites around Mehrabad Airport • IRGC logistical facilities • missile production and sustainment infrastructure Large explosions and fires were again reported near Tehran and around Mehrabad. But the most important shift is strategic, not tactical. The campaign increasingly appears aimed at preventing Iran from regenerating missile capability, not just destroying launchers currently in use. If the opening phase of the war was about suppressing immediate missile attacks, the current phase looks more like a systematic attempt to dismantle the infrastructure required for Iran to rebuild those forces. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN MISSILE ATTACKS ON ISRAEL Iran continued launching missiles toward Israel over the last 24 hours. However, the pattern of attacks continues to evolve. Recent observations indicate: • roughly 6–8 missile waves during the day • smaller salvos than earlier in the war • cluster munitions used to widen impact areas The most serious incident occurred when an Iranian cluster warhead missile struck central Israel, killing one person and injuring others. Cluster warheads disperse multiple submunitions over a wide area, meaning even a single missile can create several impact zones. Salvo trend: Early phase of the war • large coordinated barrages • dozens of missiles launched simultaneously Current phase • smaller groups of missiles • more frequent launch windows • cluster payloads increasing damage footprint This suggests Iran still retains strike capability, but the launcher network enabling large barrages is likely under increasing pressure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚔️ THE LEBANON FRONT: KHIAM BECOMES A FLASHPOINT The most notable battlefield development of the last 24 hours came from southern Lebanon. Fighting around the border town of Khiam intensified, with Hezbollah claiming direct hits on multiple Israeli Merkava tanks during clashes. While battlefield claims remain contested in real time, the fighting represents closer-range contact than most of the cross-border exchanges seen earlier in the war. Israel also confirmed the death of a second soldier in Hezbollah fighting in southern Lebanon. At the same time, Israel continued strikes on Hezbollah command centers and the Al Qard al Hassan financial network, which is used to fund Hezbollah activity. Why this matters: This front is no longer limited to rockets and airstrikes. It is increasingly showing signs of direct tactical engagement. That makes Lebanon potentially the most dangerous front of the war right now. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 IRAN IS PUSHING THE WAR INTO THE GULF Iran continues attempting to export the war into the broader region. The most significant development was a drone strike on Bahrain’s Bapco refinery, which forced the facility to declare force majeure on shipments. The refinery disruption followed earlier damage to desalination infrastructure in Bahrain. At the same time: • drone and missile alerts continued in Saudi Arabia and the UAE • Gulf air defenses remained active across multiple states Iran has also issued explicit threats regarding oil exports and the Strait of Hormuz, declaring that if the war continues it could prevent oil shipments from leaving the region. This reflects a clear Iranian strategy: If Tehran cannot win militarily, it will attempt to raise the economic cost of the war globally. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📉 GLOBAL MARKETS REACT Energy markets responded immediately to the Gulf escalation. Oil prices briefly surged toward $120 per barrel, reflecting fears that attacks on Gulf infrastructure or shipping lanes could disrupt global energy supply. Even when prices later stabilized, markets made clear they now see the Iran war as a systemic energy risk, not just a regional conflict. That gives Tehran a potential leverage point. Iran’s leadership appears to believe that threatening global energy stability could pressure Western governments to push for a ceasefire. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 THE WAR IS SPREADING ALONG THE PERIPHERY Beyond Iran and Israel, several additional fronts remain active. Recent developments include: • strikes on pro-Iranian militia positions in Iraq • tensions involving Kurdish regions near the Iran-Iraq border • diplomatic reactions following attacks on Gulf states The pattern increasingly resembles a regional pressure network, rather than a single bilateral war. Iran does not need every proxy front to win. It only needs enough instability across multiple fronts to complicate U.S. and Israeli strategy. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW Three developments define the war in the past 24 hours. 1️⃣ The Lebanon front may now be the most dangerous battlefield. The fighting around Khiam suggests Hezbollah is capable of imposing real tactical costs. 2️⃣ Iran is expanding the conflict through energy and Gulf instability. Strikes on refineries and desalination infrastructure show Tehran’s willingness to escalate economically. 3️⃣ The air campaign is shifting toward long-term denial of Iran’s missile capability. Israel and the U.S. appear increasingly focused on preventing Iran from rebuilding its strike infrastructure. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ END OF REPORT

Inside_Israel_Intel

28,875 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

QNOW: How would you describe the current situation on the Lebanese front? Answer (from the battleground, not Fake Hallucinations & Propaganda Fantasies) : What we’re witnessing right now is not a conventional escalation—it’s a structural shift in how the battlefield is being managed. On paper, Israel retains overwhelming firepower—air dominance, artillery, advanced armor. But in practice, it is failing to convert that superiority into decisive ground control. Why? Because the nature of the fight has changed. The resistance is not defending territory in the classical sense. It’s conducting what we would call an active, adaptive defense—absorbing Israeli advances and redirecting them into carefully prepared kill zones (killing traps). So instead of a linear battleground, you have a fragmented battlefield where every axis of advance becomes a potential point of attrition. This is why, despite deploying multiple divisions across several axes, Israel has not achieved a single operational breakthrough. Now, the second—and more critical—dimension is technological. We are seeing the rise of low-cost, high-impact systems, particularly FPV drones (cost $500), that are effectively neutralizing Israel’s traditional advantage in armored warfare. When a system that costs a few hundred dollars can disable a multi-million-dollar tank, you’re no longer dealing with a tactical imbalance—you’re looking at a doctrinal disruption. And this has consequences beyond the battlefield. Because once soldiers lose confidence in their technological edge, the entire psychological architecture of the army begins to erode. At the same time, Israel’s response—intensifying aerial bombardment and targeting infrastructure—suggests a shift away from maneuver warfare toward what I would describe as compensatory firepower. In other words, when you cannot advance effectively on the ground, you escalate destruction from the air to reshape the environment. But that comes with its own strategic limitation: destruction is not control. You can devastate terrain, but you cannot stabilize it without sustained ground dominance—and that is precisely where the difficulty lies. So the situation, in essence, is this: Israel is militarily engaged but strategically constrained. It faces a dilemma—advance and incur higher losses, hold position and absorb continuous attrition, or withdraw and accept a political and strategic setback. Meanwhile, the resistance is not seeking a rapid, decisive victory. It is operating on a different logic—one that focuses on prolonging the conflict, increasing its cost, and eroding the opponent’s operational and psychological resilience over time. And in modern conflicts, that kind of control—over time, cost, and pressure—often proves more decisive than firepower alone. So this is no longer just a battle over territory. It’s a contest over who can sustain the war—and on whose terms. Background info: The operational theater witnessed an exceptionally high combat tempo, marked by the execution of 52 diverse military operations by the Islamic Resistance. These operations combined intense firepower with tactical sophistication. In contrast, the Israeli occupation army is experiencing field disarray, remaining stalled along forward lines under sustained attrition. Unable to achieve results through ground maneuver, it has shifted toward indiscriminate aerial firepower and systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure and border villages, attempting to impose a fire-based buffer zone after failing to secure one through ground forces. This is no longer a war Israel can win through firepower. It is trapped in a multi-front attrition cycle where it cannot advance, cannot stabilize, and cannot disengage without loss. This battlefield shows a shift from: “Who has more firepower?” → “Who controls the tempo, cost, and psychology of war?” Right now, ground recent info indicates: the Resistance controls all three. #Lebanon
0:37

QNOW: How would you describe the current situation on the Lebanese front? Answer (from the battleground, not Fake Hallucinations & Propaganda Fantasies) : What we’re witnessing right now is not a conventional escalation—it’s a structural shift in how the battlefield is being managed. On paper, Israel retains overwhelming firepower—air dominance, artillery, advanced armor. But in practice, it is failing to convert that superiority into decisive ground control. Why? Because the nature of the fight has changed. The resistance is not defending territory in the classical sense. It’s conducting what we would call an active, adaptive defense—absorbing Israeli advances and redirecting them into carefully prepared kill zones (killing traps). So instead of a linear battleground, you have a fragmented battlefield where every axis of advance becomes a potential point of attrition. This is why, despite deploying multiple divisions across several axes, Israel has not achieved a single operational breakthrough. Now, the second—and more critical—dimension is technological. We are seeing the rise of low-cost, high-impact systems, particularly FPV drones (cost $500), that are effectively neutralizing Israel’s traditional advantage in armored warfare. When a system that costs a few hundred dollars can disable a multi-million-dollar tank, you’re no longer dealing with a tactical imbalance—you’re looking at a doctrinal disruption. And this has consequences beyond the battlefield. Because once soldiers lose confidence in their technological edge, the entire psychological architecture of the army begins to erode. At the same time, Israel’s response—intensifying aerial bombardment and targeting infrastructure—suggests a shift away from maneuver warfare toward what I would describe as compensatory firepower. In other words, when you cannot advance effectively on the ground, you escalate destruction from the air to reshape the environment. But that comes with its own strategic limitation: destruction is not control. You can devastate terrain, but you cannot stabilize it without sustained ground dominance—and that is precisely where the difficulty lies. So the situation, in essence, is this: Israel is militarily engaged but strategically constrained. It faces a dilemma—advance and incur higher losses, hold position and absorb continuous attrition, or withdraw and accept a political and strategic setback. Meanwhile, the resistance is not seeking a rapid, decisive victory. It is operating on a different logic—one that focuses on prolonging the conflict, increasing its cost, and eroding the opponent’s operational and psychological resilience over time. And in modern conflicts, that kind of control—over time, cost, and pressure—often proves more decisive than firepower alone. So this is no longer just a battle over territory. It’s a contest over who can sustain the war—and on whose terms. Background info: The operational theater witnessed an exceptionally high combat tempo, marked by the execution of 52 diverse military operations by the Islamic Resistance. These operations combined intense firepower with tactical sophistication. In contrast, the Israeli occupation army is experiencing field disarray, remaining stalled along forward lines under sustained attrition. Unable to achieve results through ground maneuver, it has shifted toward indiscriminate aerial firepower and systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure and border villages, attempting to impose a fire-based buffer zone after failing to secure one through ground forces. This is no longer a war Israel can win through firepower. It is trapped in a multi-front attrition cycle where it cannot advance, cannot stabilize, and cannot disengage without loss. This battlefield shows a shift from: “Who has more firepower?” → “Who controls the tempo, cost, and psychology of war?” Right now, ground recent info indicates: the Resistance controls all three. #Lebanon

Zeinab Al Saffar | زينـــب الصفّـــار

19,501 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

President Donald Trump last month directed the Pentagon and other federal agencies to identify and release government records regarding “alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.” The announcement comes after decades in which government agencies said they were no longer studying the phenomenon. “They were lying,” said John Greenewald, who has been requesting government documents on UFOs since the 1990s through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), in a new podcast. “It doesn’t matter if you’re a skeptic, a believer, or like us, somewhere in between. They were lying about their interest in UFOs after the 1969 closure of Project Blue Book. The Department of Defense, the NSA, the CIA, the DIA — they don’t want you to know the truth.” Project Blue Book was the Air Force’s public investigation of reports of UFOs. It ran from 1952 to 1969, but its origins date back to 1947, when Lt. General Nathan Twining, tasked with investigating the subject, sent a secret memo to the head of the Army Air Forces stating, “The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious.” Greenewald filed FOIA requests with the Navy for all photographs designated as UAP in its holdings. The Navy acknowledged possessing 78 such photographs. It released none of them. In an appeal decided just days before our conversation, the Navy reaffirmed that 100 percent of the imagery is classified. “They can do it if they want to,” Greenewald said. “You go back decades from these sensitive platforms over war zones that are releasing this imagery, redacting or blurring the sensitive coordinates or whatever heads up display information that they don’t want out there. You can easily redact or blur. It’s 2026. We can do that and do it relatively quickly and shield all that sensitive information.” He points to a video released by the Pentagon of a Russian jet spraying fuel on a US drone, a classified platform. Drone footage of strikes on Iranian targets, drug trafficking boats, and other military operations flows to the public regularly from sensitive platforms. “It is absolutely topic-specific on their cover-up of this information,” he said. “And then the question is, why is that?” The three famous UAP videos known as FLIR, Gimbal, and Go Fast were eventually released, partly because Greenewald’s FOIA requests forced the Navy to acknowledge that it considered them unclassified. Internal emails obtained through FOIA showed that his specific case number created the bind. The Navy then proactively released the videos and responded to his request the same day. When Greenewald requested all additional UAP videos beyond those three, the Navy responded that 100 percent of the remaining videos are classified. “You’ve already admitted that three UAP videos were unclassified and you finally released those. Now you’re claiming that 100 percent of the rest are all classified. That part didn’t make sense.” Among the most striking documents Greenewald has obtained is a briefing document from the UAP Task Force. The document lists potential explanations for UAP encounters. Some are visible. “Unknown weather or other natural phenomena” appears as one possibility. But the first and third potential explanations are blacked out.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
7:09

President Donald Trump last month directed the Pentagon and other federal agencies to identify and release government records regarding “alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.” The announcement comes after decades in which government agencies said they were no longer studying the phenomenon. “They were lying,” said John Greenewald, who has been requesting government documents on UFOs since the 1990s through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), in a new podcast. “It doesn’t matter if you’re a skeptic, a believer, or like us, somewhere in between. They were lying about their interest in UFOs after the 1969 closure of Project Blue Book. The Department of Defense, the NSA, the CIA, the DIA — they don’t want you to know the truth.” Project Blue Book was the Air Force’s public investigation of reports of UFOs. It ran from 1952 to 1969, but its origins date back to 1947, when Lt. General Nathan Twining, tasked with investigating the subject, sent a secret memo to the head of the Army Air Forces stating, “The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious.” Greenewald filed FOIA requests with the Navy for all photographs designated as UAP in its holdings. The Navy acknowledged possessing 78 such photographs. It released none of them. In an appeal decided just days before our conversation, the Navy reaffirmed that 100 percent of the imagery is classified. “They can do it if they want to,” Greenewald said. “You go back decades from these sensitive platforms over war zones that are releasing this imagery, redacting or blurring the sensitive coordinates or whatever heads up display information that they don’t want out there. You can easily redact or blur. It’s 2026. We can do that and do it relatively quickly and shield all that sensitive information.” He points to a video released by the Pentagon of a Russian jet spraying fuel on a US drone, a classified platform. Drone footage of strikes on Iranian targets, drug trafficking boats, and other military operations flows to the public regularly from sensitive platforms. “It is absolutely topic-specific on their cover-up of this information,” he said. “And then the question is, why is that?” The three famous UAP videos known as FLIR, Gimbal, and Go Fast were eventually released, partly because Greenewald’s FOIA requests forced the Navy to acknowledge that it considered them unclassified. Internal emails obtained through FOIA showed that his specific case number created the bind. The Navy then proactively released the videos and responded to his request the same day. When Greenewald requested all additional UAP videos beyond those three, the Navy responded that 100 percent of the remaining videos are classified. “You’ve already admitted that three UAP videos were unclassified and you finally released those. Now you’re claiming that 100 percent of the rest are all classified. That part didn’t make sense.” Among the most striking documents Greenewald has obtained is a briefing document from the UAP Task Force. The document lists potential explanations for UAP encounters. Some are visible. “Unknown weather or other natural phenomena” appears as one possibility. But the first and third potential explanations are blacked out.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

52,853 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

💢 REPORT | Israel Violating Ceasefire on Day One, Killing 3 Civilians and Pushing Into Villages in Lebanon In the first 24 hours after the U.S.-Iran deal was formally announced, Israel has repeatedly violated the U.S.-backed Lebanon ceasefire, killing civilians, shelling towns, and attempting ground incursions across south Lebanon despite the agreement’s stated clause of halting fighting “on all fronts, including Lebanon.” 🔸 The dead: ➤ Ismail Allam was killed in Yater (Bint Jbeil) in an explosion whose cause, whether an Israeli strike, unexploded ordnance, or another suspicious object, remains under investigation. L’Orient Today described him as the first person killed in Lebanon since the deal took effect overnight. ➤ An Israeli drone later struck a car at the Kfar Tibnit roundabout, killing a person whose body was reportedly left unrecognizable, according to L’Orient Today. ➤ Earlier, an Israeli drone dropped a stun grenade on civilians walking toward Mansouri (Sour), killing one person and wounding several others. 🔸 A journalist targeted: ➤ Press TV correspondent Hadi Hoteit was wounded in Kfar Tibnit after an Israeli drone dropped a grenade that exploded less than a meter from him while he was reporting. Speaking from the hospital, Hoteit said Israel had deliberately targeted him. Video appears to show deliberate targeting as well. ➤ Lebanon’s photojournalists’ syndicate later urged journalists not to rush back into frontline areas, warning that “nothing is guaranteed.” 🔸 Ground incursions and clashes: ➤ Hezbollah said it “repelled” an Israeli force, including an excavator and two Merkava tanks, advancing from Arnoun toward Kfar Tibnit at around 6:15 p.m., using guided missiles and Ababil attack drones. ➤ Drop Site sources in the south reported Israeli forces attempting to push into Bra’shit, with tanks audible and a massive explosion reported in the village. Israeli troops were also said to be positioned near homes on the outskirts toward Beit Yahoun and Kounine. ➤ Israeli soldiers advanced and carried out sweeping fire toward Bouyout al-Sayyed near a UNIFIL position in the Sour district 🔸 Shelling, drones, and blocked roads: ➤ Israeli artillery struck the Ali al-Taher hills and a road near Zawtar al-Sharqieh, while the army detonated a large explosive device in Aita al-Jabal and, according to Lebanon’s National News Agency and Drop Site sources, detonated car bombs on the Haris-Tibnin road. ➤ Quadcopter drones were reported “dropping bombs,” while roads around Haris, Kafra, Haddatha, and Tebnine were described as too dangerous to travel. The Lebanese Army closed multiple roads and warned displaced residents not to return to border villages. 🔸 The toll and the backdrop: ➤ Lebanon’s Health Ministry said Israeli attacks over the previous 24 hours killed 15 people and wounded 82, bringing the toll since March 2 to 3,798 killed and 11,781 wounded. ➤ Israeli leaders also made clear they do not consider themselves bound by the agreement. Netanyahu said the army would remain in Lebanon “as long as necessary” and, according to Israeli media, told Trump that Israel “does not consider itself bound by the Lebanon clause.” Defense Minister Israel Katz and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich likewise vowed to continue military operations, with Smotrich calling for the campaign in Lebanon to be intensified.
1:07

💢 REPORT | Israel Violating Ceasefire on Day One, Killing 3 Civilians and Pushing Into Villages in Lebanon In the first 24 hours after the U.S.-Iran deal was formally announced, Israel has repeatedly violated the U.S.-backed Lebanon ceasefire, killing civilians, shelling towns, and attempting ground incursions across south Lebanon despite the agreement’s stated clause of halting fighting “on all fronts, including Lebanon.” 🔸 The dead: ➤ Ismail Allam was killed in Yater (Bint Jbeil) in an explosion whose cause, whether an Israeli strike, unexploded ordnance, or another suspicious object, remains under investigation. L’Orient Today described him as the first person killed in Lebanon since the deal took effect overnight. ➤ An Israeli drone later struck a car at the Kfar Tibnit roundabout, killing a person whose body was reportedly left unrecognizable, according to L’Orient Today. ➤ Earlier, an Israeli drone dropped a stun grenade on civilians walking toward Mansouri (Sour), killing one person and wounding several others. 🔸 A journalist targeted: ➤ Press TV correspondent Hadi Hoteit was wounded in Kfar Tibnit after an Israeli drone dropped a grenade that exploded less than a meter from him while he was reporting. Speaking from the hospital, Hoteit said Israel had deliberately targeted him. Video appears to show deliberate targeting as well. ➤ Lebanon’s photojournalists’ syndicate later urged journalists not to rush back into frontline areas, warning that “nothing is guaranteed.” 🔸 Ground incursions and clashes: ➤ Hezbollah said it “repelled” an Israeli force, including an excavator and two Merkava tanks, advancing from Arnoun toward Kfar Tibnit at around 6:15 p.m., using guided missiles and Ababil attack drones. ➤ Drop Site sources in the south reported Israeli forces attempting to push into Bra’shit, with tanks audible and a massive explosion reported in the village. Israeli troops were also said to be positioned near homes on the outskirts toward Beit Yahoun and Kounine. ➤ Israeli soldiers advanced and carried out sweeping fire toward Bouyout al-Sayyed near a UNIFIL position in the Sour district 🔸 Shelling, drones, and blocked roads: ➤ Israeli artillery struck the Ali al-Taher hills and a road near Zawtar al-Sharqieh, while the army detonated a large explosive device in Aita al-Jabal and, according to Lebanon’s National News Agency and Drop Site sources, detonated car bombs on the Haris-Tibnin road. ➤ Quadcopter drones were reported “dropping bombs,” while roads around Haris, Kafra, Haddatha, and Tebnine were described as too dangerous to travel. The Lebanese Army closed multiple roads and warned displaced residents not to return to border villages. 🔸 The toll and the backdrop: ➤ Lebanon’s Health Ministry said Israeli attacks over the previous 24 hours killed 15 people and wounded 82, bringing the toll since March 2 to 3,798 killed and 11,781 wounded. ➤ Israeli leaders also made clear they do not consider themselves bound by the agreement. Netanyahu said the army would remain in Lebanon “as long as necessary” and, according to Israeli media, told Trump that Israel “does not consider itself bound by the Lebanon clause.” Defense Minister Israel Katz and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich likewise vowed to continue military operations, with Smotrich calling for the campaign in Lebanon to be intensified.

Drop Site

47,911 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten