Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 $BTC VOLATILITY INCOMING! Bitcoin has been extremely volatile after every Jackson Hole since 2022. Friday 10:00 AM ET, Kevin Warsh's first as Fed Chair. IF DOVISH → BITCOIN BREAKS $80,000 AND RUNS IF HAWKISH → STRAIGHT BACK TO $73,000 IF NEUTRAL → CHOP Be ready.

Crypto Rover

1,609,763 subscribers

112,473 views • 21 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Kevin Warsh has just been confirmed as GOVERNOR of the FED. Tomorrow he will possibly be confirmed as CHAIRMAN OF THE FED, if the Senate vote advances. The first PRO-BITCOIN FED CHAIR! 🚀

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Kevin Warsh has just been confirmed as GOVERNOR of the FED. Tomorrow he will possibly be confirmed as CHAIRMAN OF THE FED, if the Senate vote advances. The first PRO-BITCOIN FED CHAIR! 🚀

Crypto Rover

254,908 views • 4 months ago

HAS BITCOIN BOTTOMED AGAINST GOLD? In both the 2018 and 2022 cycles, the BTC/Gold ratio bottomed after exactly 10 red monthly candles from its peak. Since the November 2024 peak, BTC/Gold has now closed 10 red monthly candles. If the pattern holds, the bottom could be in. And the price action backs it up. Since February 2026, we've had a US-Iran war, high inflation, and Fed uncertainty, yet BTC/Gold is holding higher. That's a sign of strength. If history repeats, we could see money rotate out of Gold and into Bitcoin, a shift that could last the next 2-3 years.

HAS BITCOIN BOTTOMED AGAINST GOLD? In both the 2018 and 2022 cycles, the BTC/Gold ratio bottomed after exactly 10 red monthly candles from its peak. Since the November 2024 peak, BTC/Gold has now closed 10 red monthly candles. If the pattern holds, the bottom could be in. And the price action backs it up. Since February 2026, we've had a US-Iran war, high inflation, and Fed uncertainty, yet BTC/Gold is holding higher. That's a sign of strength. If history repeats, we could see money rotate out of Gold and into Bitcoin, a shift that could last the next 2-3 years.

Ash Crypto

53,801 views • 3 months ago

🚨SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG WITH BITCOIN This pump above $80K looks manipulated. Bitcoin is not ready for a real breakout. Even if BTC pushes to $83K, I expect rejection. Rejection → Move Lower There is too much liquidity sitting below. Most upside liquidity has already been taken. The roadmap is still clear: $83K → $60K → $54K → New Cycle Once BTC loses $60K, real fear should begin. That’s what we need for the final macro bottom. I expect new lows, but not a huge collapse. $54K remains my main bottom target. Don’t forget this: I track every major macro event daily. The next major Bitcoin warning gets posted here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

🚨SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG WITH BITCOIN This pump above $80K looks manipulated. Bitcoin is not ready for a real breakout. Even if BTC pushes to $83K, I expect rejection. Rejection → Move Lower There is too much liquidity sitting below. Most upside liquidity has already been taken. The roadmap is still clear: $83K → $60K → $54K → New Cycle Once BTC loses $60K, real fear should begin. That’s what we need for the final macro bottom. I expect new lows, but not a huge collapse. $54K remains my main bottom target. Don’t forget this: I track every major macro event daily. The next major Bitcoin warning gets posted here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

winkle.

47,131 views • 17 days ago

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:

Adam Livingston

66,707 views • 4 months ago

Ray Dalio is right about one thing: Bitcoin forces you to think harder. But zoom out. 1) “Bitcoin has no privacy.” Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. That’s by design. Transparency is what makes it auditable, trust-minimized, and globally verifiable. Privacy isn’t binary — it’s a spectrum. Second-layer solutions like Lightning Network improve transactional privacy, and self-custody + best practices eliminate counterparty surveillance. If your definition of “privacy” is “opaque like the banking system,” then yes — Bitcoin is different. It replaces institutional secrecy with mathematical transparency. 2) “Central banks don’t want to buy Bitcoin.” Correct. Central banks also didn’t want the internet, stablecoins, or gold leaving their vaults. Bitcoin isn’t competing for central bank approval. It’s competing as neutral collateral in a world of weaponized fiat. When sovereign debt hits structural limits, assets without counterparty risk win. That’s why individuals, institutions, ETFs, and even nation-states accumulate it — regardless of central bank preferences. 3) “Quantum computing issues.” If quantum breaks Bitcoin’s cryptography, it breaks the entire global financial system first — SWIFT, online banking, military communications. Bitcoin can upgrade via consensus long before that scenario materializes. Cryptography evolves. That’s not a flaw; that’s software. 4) “Relatively small and controlled market.” Every monetization process starts small. Gold was once a niche commodity. The internet was once “small and controlled.” Bitcoin’s market cap reflects 15 years of monetization — with no CEO, no marketing budget, and no state backing. And “controlled”? Try censoring a decentralized network running across tens of thousands of nodes worldwide. Dalio views Bitcoin through a macro-hedge lens. But Bitcoin isn’t just an asset. It’s: •Programmatic scarcity (21M hard cap) •Final settlement without intermediaries •Borderless value transfer •A hedge against monetary debasement The real question isn’t whether central banks want Bitcoin. It’s whether individuals want money that can’t be inflated, frozen, or diluted. History suggests they do.

Ray Dalio is right about one thing: Bitcoin forces you to think harder. But zoom out. 1) “Bitcoin has no privacy.” Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. That’s by design. Transparency is what makes it auditable, trust-minimized, and globally verifiable. Privacy isn’t binary — it’s a spectrum. Second-layer solutions like Lightning Network improve transactional privacy, and self-custody + best practices eliminate counterparty surveillance. If your definition of “privacy” is “opaque like the banking system,” then yes — Bitcoin is different. It replaces institutional secrecy with mathematical transparency. 2) “Central banks don’t want to buy Bitcoin.” Correct. Central banks also didn’t want the internet, stablecoins, or gold leaving their vaults. Bitcoin isn’t competing for central bank approval. It’s competing as neutral collateral in a world of weaponized fiat. When sovereign debt hits structural limits, assets without counterparty risk win. That’s why individuals, institutions, ETFs, and even nation-states accumulate it — regardless of central bank preferences. 3) “Quantum computing issues.” If quantum breaks Bitcoin’s cryptography, it breaks the entire global financial system first — SWIFT, online banking, military communications. Bitcoin can upgrade via consensus long before that scenario materializes. Cryptography evolves. That’s not a flaw; that’s software. 4) “Relatively small and controlled market.” Every monetization process starts small. Gold was once a niche commodity. The internet was once “small and controlled.” Bitcoin’s market cap reflects 15 years of monetization — with no CEO, no marketing budget, and no state backing. And “controlled”? Try censoring a decentralized network running across tens of thousands of nodes worldwide. Dalio views Bitcoin through a macro-hedge lens. But Bitcoin isn’t just an asset. It’s: •Programmatic scarcity (21M hard cap) •Final settlement without intermediaries •Borderless value transfer •A hedge against monetary debasement The real question isn’t whether central banks want Bitcoin. It’s whether individuals want money that can’t be inflated, frozen, or diluted. History suggests they do.

Asaf · Satoshi Signal ⚡ @SatoshiSignal

22,503 views • 6 months ago

Pep Guardiola revealed in an interview about his wife being the problem and not him and very much willing to take her back only if she wishes 🎙️Interviewer: so after everything that happened between you two are you still willing to take her back? 🗣️Pep: Look… she’s the problem, not me. I’ve said this quietly for a long time. I know where the issues come from. But yes,I am still willing to take her back. That has always been my prayer. From the first day until now. I never stopped wanting that. If she is ready to fix what needs to be fixed, I am here. I have never closed that door,I am still pissed but for the sake of the kids.

Pep Guardiola revealed in an interview about his wife being the problem and not him and very much willing to take her back only if she wishes 🎙️Interviewer: so after everything that happened between you two are you still willing to take her back? 🗣️Pep: Look… she’s the problem, not me. I’ve said this quietly for a long time. I know where the issues come from. But yes,I am still willing to take her back. That has always been my prayer. From the first day until now. I never stopped wanting that. If she is ready to fix what needs to be fixed, I am here. I have never closed that door,I am still pissed but for the sake of the kids.

𝔹𝕚𝔾 𝔻ℝ𝔼𝕐𝕐🫵

283,149 views • 21 days ago

I am destroyed today, I have no words... The premier spot for Crypto meet-ups in Puerto Rico just burned out today in a horrible fire. Everyone is safe but my friend lost his business, I have no words. I have never asked Web3 for anything, not a rug, not to invest in an nft nor a token, I've always been the first to engage & help... I ask you today please help me. I am raising money for 𝙎𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙣 🆅🅾🅻🆂 ᴾᵘᵉʳᵗᵒ ᴿⁱᶜᵒ. He is extremely well known in Solana & Bitcoin. If you can help here are two fresh wallets, I will be sending EVERY single penny to him to help him out. Sol: HDAWkpRbe31bxxiZ34f4qdyzT8UdckefBsBQFHPHERof BTC: 3FQqdyc9SpcPRzmefpgkZRuXQcngopYswx

I am destroyed today, I have no words... The premier spot for Crypto meet-ups in Puerto Rico just burned out today in a horrible fire. Everyone is safe but my friend lost his business, I have no words. I have never asked Web3 for anything, not a rug, not to invest in an nft nor a token, I've always been the first to engage & help... I ask you today please help me. I am raising money for 𝙎𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙣 🆅🅾🅻🆂 ᴾᵘᵉʳᵗᵒ ᴿⁱᶜᵒ. He is extremely well known in Solana & Bitcoin. If you can help here are two fresh wallets, I will be sending EVERY single penny to him to help him out. Sol: HDAWkpRbe31bxxiZ34f4qdyzT8UdckefBsBQFHPHERof BTC: 3FQqdyc9SpcPRzmefpgkZRuXQcngopYswx

ALLEN 🐺

90,195 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Fed Chair Warsh Says He’s “Not Waiting” To Introduce Innovation At The Federal Reserve. This comes after the Chinese hacked into the Federal Reserve systems. Ask yourself why a brand-new Chair would say that at Jackson Hole of all places. The plumbing is already built. Ripple has been stress-testing the rails for years. ISO 20022. ODL. Instant settlement. The Fed doesn’t need to invent a new network from scratch, they just need to flip the switch. Don’t be surprised if Ripple gets the Fed Master Account approval and performs FedNow payments and operations. JP Morgan already connected the XRP Ledger to Interbank Settlement with Ripple, Ondo and Mastercard. They waited until the Chair changed. Now the language shifted from “study” to “not waiting.” XRP isn’t a retail coin. It’s the settlement layer they already know works. That’s why there is abundant evidence that XRP was never meant for retail. Stack accordingly. The delay was never technical. It was political. That’s over.

Stellar Rippler🚀

19,885 views • 17 days ago

🚨IF THIS PATTERN HOLDS - MONDAY BLEEDS Jackson Hole just pressed the "WE'RE F#KED" button That wasn't a calm speech the market wanted And what almost nobody is connecting: Is that these 3 things stacked up together might actually beat the shi out of the recent profit SP500 made heres why. ONE: the Fed just turned hawkish, right into decision season. Warsh said he's "committed to fighting inflation." Called it above target. September hike odds spiked off that ONE speech. another Fed president backed him same day. The market wanted clarity. it got clarity, and the clarity was hawkish. TWO: rising yields already broke this market once this month. A yield spike caused a real selloff just last week. a hawkish Fed pushing yields higher again is the exact mechanism that hits expensive AI/tech names first. THREE: the leadership is already cracking. Nvidia and Intel dragged the Nasdaq lower the same day as the hawkish pivot. And this is happening in a market where the top 10 stocks are the most concentrated ever recorded. When the few stocks holding up the whole index start wobbling, into a hawkish Fed, into rising yields, that's not 3 separate stories. Thats 1 story with 3 symptoms. im not calling monday a generational crash. But if yields keep climbing and semis keep bleeding, this is exactly the setup that turns a quiet monday into a violent one. Follow me if you want to actually survive in the current market.

🚨IF THIS PATTERN HOLDS - MONDAY BLEEDS Jackson Hole just pressed the "WE'RE F#KED" button That wasn't a calm speech the market wanted And what almost nobody is connecting: Is that these 3 things stacked up together might actually beat the shi out of the recent profit SP500 made heres why. ONE: the Fed just turned hawkish, right into decision season. Warsh said he's "committed to fighting inflation." Called it above target. September hike odds spiked off that ONE speech. another Fed president backed him same day. The market wanted clarity. it got clarity, and the clarity was hawkish. TWO: rising yields already broke this market once this month. A yield spike caused a real selloff just last week. a hawkish Fed pushing yields higher again is the exact mechanism that hits expensive AI/tech names first. THREE: the leadership is already cracking. Nvidia and Intel dragged the Nasdaq lower the same day as the hawkish pivot. And this is happening in a market where the top 10 stocks are the most concentrated ever recorded. When the few stocks holding up the whole index start wobbling, into a hawkish Fed, into rising yields, that's not 3 separate stories. Thats 1 story with 3 symptoms. im not calling monday a generational crash. But if yields keep climbing and semis keep bleeding, this is exactly the setup that turns a quiet monday into a violent one. Follow me if you want to actually survive in the current market.

Frogify

34,448 views • 16 days ago

🚨 BITCOIN: ELON MUSK ON GOOGLE QUANTUM THREAT: "IF YOU FORGOT THE PASSWORD TO YOUR WALLET, IT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE IN THE FUTURE" Elon Musk responded to the escalating Google quantum computing debate with his characteristic humor after Max the VC summarized Google's position as: "We've cut the quantum resources needed to break Bitcoin's encryption by 20x. We can now break it. We can prove it. We're just not going to tell you how." Max was quote-tweeting Nic Carter's original thread on Google moving its post-quantum cryptography deadline to 2029. Musk quipped "On the plus side, if you forgot the password to your wallet, it will be accessible in the future" alongside a Grok response estimating the earliest plausible date for cracking ECC-256 (used by Bitcoin and Ethereum) at late 2028-2029 under aggressive scenarios, with conservative consensus pointing to early-to-mid 2030s. An estimated 6.9M BTC (~32% of supply) sits in wallets with exposed public keys. Ethereum has an active post-quantum roadmap. Bitcoin has no coordinated migration plan.

🚨 BITCOIN: ELON MUSK ON GOOGLE QUANTUM THREAT: "IF YOU FORGOT THE PASSWORD TO YOUR WALLET, IT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE IN THE FUTURE" Elon Musk responded to the escalating Google quantum computing debate with his characteristic humor after Max the VC summarized Google's position as: "We've cut the quantum resources needed to break Bitcoin's encryption by 20x. We can now break it. We can prove it. We're just not going to tell you how." Max was quote-tweeting Nic Carter's original thread on Google moving its post-quantum cryptography deadline to 2029. Musk quipped "On the plus side, if you forgot the password to your wallet, it will be accessible in the future" alongside a Grok response estimating the earliest plausible date for cracking ECC-256 (used by Bitcoin and Ethereum) at late 2028-2029 under aggressive scenarios, with conservative consensus pointing to early-to-mid 2030s. An estimated 6.9M BTC (~32% of supply) sits in wallets with exposed public keys. Ethereum has an active post-quantum roadmap. Bitcoin has no coordinated migration plan.

BSCN

50,075 views • 5 months ago

🚨 THIS COULD BE THE WORST MONDAY OF THE YEAR Every year has a "Black Monday" when the stock market is covered in red. Markets will be hit from ALL sides. → The US Iran peace deal is falling apart → Markets are now pricing in Fed rate hikes for 2026 → Investors are rotating out of high risk growth names as risk sentiment deteriorates If you hold any assets today, you MUST read this. When markets open next week, this won't be "just another dip." Stocks will dump. Bonds will dump. Gold and Silver will dump. Bitcoin will collapse. Keep in mind: I called BTC at $16K and the top at $126K When I exit, you'll see it here first. Turn notifications on.

🚨 THIS COULD BE THE WORST MONDAY OF THE YEAR Every year has a "Black Monday" when the stock market is covered in red. Markets will be hit from ALL sides. → The US Iran peace deal is falling apart → Markets are now pricing in Fed rate hikes for 2026 → Investors are rotating out of high risk growth names as risk sentiment deteriorates If you hold any assets today, you MUST read this. When markets open next week, this won't be "just another dip." Stocks will dump. Bonds will dump. Gold and Silver will dump. Bitcoin will collapse. Keep in mind: I called BTC at $16K and the top at $126K When I exit, you'll see it here first. Turn notifications on.

winkle.

108,102 views • 2 months ago

"You cannot treat a 15-year-old talent like a musical chair!" — Ravi Shastri absolutely fires up the commentary box after Vaibhav Suryavanshi gets dropped for the 5th T20I🚨😡🗣️ "Listen, if you are going to pick a 15-year-old boy based on an insane IPL season and throw him straight into English conditions against Jofra Archer, you have to be ready to back him through the storms! You cannot treat a generational talent like a game of musical chairs—dropping him after scores of 14, 13, and 15 makes no sense. International cricket is a different beast, the short-ball parameters are harsh, but how is he supposed to adapt if he's looking over his shoulder after every single failure? You either give the kid a secure 10-match rope to absorb the pressure, or you don't expose him to this level so early!"

"You cannot treat a 15-year-old talent like a musical chair!" — Ravi Shastri absolutely fires up the commentary box after Vaibhav Suryavanshi gets dropped for the 5th T20I🚨😡🗣️ "Listen, if you are going to pick a 15-year-old boy based on an insane IPL season and throw him straight into English conditions against Jofra Archer, you have to be ready to back him through the storms! You cannot treat a generational talent like a game of musical chairs—dropping him after scores of 14, 13, and 15 makes no sense. International cricket is a different beast, the short-ball parameters are harsh, but how is he supposed to adapt if he's looking over his shoulder after every single failure? You either give the kid a secure 10-match rope to absorb the pressure, or you don't expose him to this level so early!"

sportified

1,004,776 views • 2 months ago

THREE RED QUARTERS IN A ROW This signal has never been wrong Bitcoin is on track to close three consecutive red quarters That's only happened three times in history: 2014 → -74% 2019 → -69% 2022 → -67% This cycle BTC is already down over 53% Every single time this signal appeared, one final capitulation leg followed before the real bottom formed That leg may not be over yet I've called every major top and bottom for 15 years, including the $16K bottom and the $126K top both publicly, both before they happened The next call will be even more important I'll post it here publicly like I always do Turn notifications on if you're not following yet, you'll understand why that was a mistake later

THREE RED QUARTERS IN A ROW This signal has never been wrong Bitcoin is on track to close three consecutive red quarters That's only happened three times in history: 2014 → -74% 2019 → -69% 2022 → -67% This cycle BTC is already down over 53% Every single time this signal appeared, one final capitulation leg followed before the real bottom formed That leg may not be over yet I've called every major top and bottom for 15 years, including the $16K bottom and the $126K top both publicly, both before they happened The next call will be even more important I'll post it here publicly like I always do Turn notifications on if you're not following yet, you'll understand why that was a mistake later

ardizor 🧙‍♂️

37,846 views • 2 months ago

🚨 DUMP BELOW $80,000 WILL BE CRUEL I’ve been trading for more than 20 years and have never seen this much long-side liquidity stacked in a single zone. More than $5 billion in longs gets wiped out if the price loses $80,000. Do you understand what that means? $5 billion is about to get liquidated. Once it happens, the cascade will be unstoppable. Your favorite KOL who said, “Bitcoin has only one way to go: up,” is about to get liquidated. And here’s the part nobody wants to hear: This is the only right moment when you should buy. Exactly when it feels the most painful and brutal. When that liquidity gets taken, the best buying opportunity comes. This is how we make money in the market. For context: I’ve been trading markets for 20+ years. I’ve seen every kind of bubble, crash and liquidation. I only care about the moves that matter. When the next one comes, my followers will see it first. Follow and turn notifications on. You won’t get a second warning.

🚨 DUMP BELOW $80,000 WILL BE CRUEL I’ve been trading for more than 20 years and have never seen this much long-side liquidity stacked in a single zone. More than $5 billion in longs gets wiped out if the price loses $80,000. Do you understand what that means? $5 billion is about to get liquidated. Once it happens, the cascade will be unstoppable. Your favorite KOL who said, “Bitcoin has only one way to go: up,” is about to get liquidated. And here’s the part nobody wants to hear: This is the only right moment when you should buy. Exactly when it feels the most painful and brutal. When that liquidity gets taken, the best buying opportunity comes. This is how we make money in the market. For context: I’ve been trading markets for 20+ years. I’ve seen every kind of bubble, crash and liquidation. I only care about the moves that matter. When the next one comes, my followers will see it first. Follow and turn notifications on. You won’t get a second warning.

Mull Ⓜ️

73,063 views • 11 days ago

satoshi never existed. nobody writes code like that. not that clean, not that surgical. the early bitcoin codebase doesn’t read like code from some anonymous guy on the internet. bitcoin's early codebase looks like it was handed to us. the whitepaper came out six weeks after the 2008 crash. that's not enough time to dream up a working distributed consensus system, let alone build one. then there’s secp256k1. not secp256r1, the curve everybody used. k1 was obscure, weird, and a terrible choice if you were just following convention. but it also happened to be one of the hardest to backdoor. and then satoshi disappears. roughly a million btc, untouched. people don’t walk away from that kind of money unless the money was never the point. because maybe bitcoin was never just money. what it actually did was create a global incentive to build compute. millions of people, in every country, pouring capital into hardware and electricity to chase block rewards. no state could have coordinated it that fast. no company could have justified it. a protocol paying out internet money gets people moving. then nvidia happened. the same GPUs pushed into the world for mining turned out to be perfect for large-scale parallel compute. the same hardware appetite bitcoin created ended up helping make modern deep learning possible. bitcoin launches in 2009. imagenet breaks things open in 2012. three years. bitcoin was the bootloader. and we’ve been running the install script.

satoshi never existed. nobody writes code like that. not that clean, not that surgical. the early bitcoin codebase doesn’t read like code from some anonymous guy on the internet. bitcoin's early codebase looks like it was handed to us. the whitepaper came out six weeks after the 2008 crash. that's not enough time to dream up a working distributed consensus system, let alone build one. then there’s secp256k1. not secp256r1, the curve everybody used. k1 was obscure, weird, and a terrible choice if you were just following convention. but it also happened to be one of the hardest to backdoor. and then satoshi disappears. roughly a million btc, untouched. people don’t walk away from that kind of money unless the money was never the point. because maybe bitcoin was never just money. what it actually did was create a global incentive to build compute. millions of people, in every country, pouring capital into hardware and electricity to chase block rewards. no state could have coordinated it that fast. no company could have justified it. a protocol paying out internet money gets people moving. then nvidia happened. the same GPUs pushed into the world for mining turned out to be perfect for large-scale parallel compute. the same hardware appetite bitcoin created ended up helping make modern deep learning possible. bitcoin launches in 2009. imagenet breaks things open in 2012. three years. bitcoin was the bootloader. and we’ve been running the install script.

tetsuo

53,736 views • 5 months ago

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING TERRIBLE WILL HAPPEN ON MONDAY!! The U.S. just hit the panic button. The odds of a Fed rate hike in September have jumped to 70%. U.S. Treasury is launching a $1 TRILLION buyback program to prevent a market crash. 99% of people will lose everything next week. And it won't be “just another dip.” Stocks will crash. Metals will dump. Bitcoin will collapse even harder. Insiders already know what's coming. They are not “buying the dip.” They are raising cash, cutting risk, and positioning for a catastrophic market event. Meanwhile, alarm bells are ringing across the global financial system. China is dumping U.S. Treasuries at an alarming rate, with holdings dropping to the lowest levels since 2008. Japan's bond market volatility has forced the BOJ back into QE, but it's not enough to stem the tide. The odds of a Fed rate hike in September have jumped to 70%. In response, the U.S. Treasury is launching a $1 TRILLION buyback program to prevent a market crash. Kevin Warsh already sounds hawkish at the Jackson Hole conference. This means interest rates will stay higher for longer. And global liquidity is disappearing fast: → Japanese bond yields are surging → Foreign demand for U.S. Treasuries is weakening → Global bond markets are under heavy pressure → Volatility is spreading across asset classes → Liquidity is tightening worldwide It's already spiraling out of control. When this accelerates, there will be no time left to react. Risk assets won't “dip.” They will DUMP HARD. This is exactly how chain reactions begin. Because once markets start pricing prolonged instability, the entire framework changes. I have spent 10+ tracking macro and systemic market reactions like this. I will share my next move here publicly. Follow and turn notifications on. Because by the time it reaches the headlines, it will be too late.

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING TERRIBLE WILL HAPPEN ON MONDAY!! The U.S. just hit the panic button. The odds of a Fed rate hike in September have jumped to 70%. U.S. Treasury is launching a $1 TRILLION buyback program to prevent a market crash. 99% of people will lose everything next week. And it won't be “just another dip.” Stocks will crash. Metals will dump. Bitcoin will collapse even harder. Insiders already know what's coming. They are not “buying the dip.” They are raising cash, cutting risk, and positioning for a catastrophic market event. Meanwhile, alarm bells are ringing across the global financial system. China is dumping U.S. Treasuries at an alarming rate, with holdings dropping to the lowest levels since 2008. Japan's bond market volatility has forced the BOJ back into QE, but it's not enough to stem the tide. The odds of a Fed rate hike in September have jumped to 70%. In response, the U.S. Treasury is launching a $1 TRILLION buyback program to prevent a market crash. Kevin Warsh already sounds hawkish at the Jackson Hole conference. This means interest rates will stay higher for longer. And global liquidity is disappearing fast: → Japanese bond yields are surging → Foreign demand for U.S. Treasuries is weakening → Global bond markets are under heavy pressure → Volatility is spreading across asset classes → Liquidity is tightening worldwide It's already spiraling out of control. When this accelerates, there will be no time left to react. Risk assets won't “dip.” They will DUMP HARD. This is exactly how chain reactions begin. Because once markets start pricing prolonged instability, the entire framework changes. I have spent 10+ tracking macro and systemic market reactions like this. I will share my next move here publicly. Follow and turn notifications on. Because by the time it reaches the headlines, it will be too late.

0xNobler

328,658 views • 16 days ago

🚨 WARNING: $SPX IS ONE MOVE AWAY FROM A CRASH The S&P 500 has been DUMPING for three consecutive weeks. Most people still think this is just another healthy pullback. They have NO idea what will happen next. Wave 6 has already marked the local top. The final melt-up could be over. But the biggest warning is market concentration. Only five stocks have been carrying the entire index: → Apple → Nvidia → Amazon → Microsoft → Meta Now that weakness is spreading across mega caps, the entire structure is becoming extremely fragile. Meta has already dumped more than 15% in one month. If the remaining leaders follow: → Index concentration breaks → Dip buyers get trapped → Selling pressure accelerates → The correction turns into a major crash When the AI bubble finally bursts, there may be nothing left holding $SPX at these levels. I’ve studied macro for 10 years and called almost every major market top, including the October Bitcoin ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the next major move BEFORE it becomes obvious.

🚨 WARNING: $SPX IS ONE MOVE AWAY FROM A CRASH The S&P 500 has been DUMPING for three consecutive weeks. Most people still think this is just another healthy pullback. They have NO idea what will happen next. Wave 6 has already marked the local top. The final melt-up could be over. But the biggest warning is market concentration. Only five stocks have been carrying the entire index: → Apple → Nvidia → Amazon → Microsoft → Meta Now that weakness is spreading across mega caps, the entire structure is becoming extremely fragile. Meta has already dumped more than 15% in one month. If the remaining leaders follow: → Index concentration breaks → Dip buyers get trapped → Selling pressure accelerates → The correction turns into a major crash When the AI bubble finally bursts, there may be nothing left holding $SPX at these levels. I’ve studied macro for 10 years and called almost every major market top, including the October Bitcoin ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the next major move BEFORE it becomes obvious.

Wimar.X

186,485 views • 1 month ago

$BTC UPDATE My long on #BTC is closed My plan has changed: 1. First long zone – $64,700 (DONE) 2. Second long zone – $62,500/$61,200 (DONE) 3. There is a Head and Shoulders pattern on the 1D chart (DONE) 4. First target – $68,500/$69,400 (DONE) 5. Second target – $72K (DONE) 6. Third target – $76K (SEE EXPLANATION BELOW) 7. After that, I expect the final drop to begin in August/September. Bitcoin reached my targets within two days - this shows the strength of the market at the moment. Therefore, I’m considering the possibility of a new target. As I mentioned before, once $BTC reaches our targets, we should see an altcoin rally - and it has already started. As I said earlier, buying spot through DCA is not a bad idea. My $ETH long is still open, while my $BTC long was closed at $69K. To open a short, I need to see bearish structure first. I’m not going to try to catch a knife, so I haven’t opened a short yet. If anything changes, I’ll let you know! DYOR. REMINDER: I warned about the BTC bull trap at $82K, the summer drop, and the SPACE X decline before they even happened. MY NEXT CALL WILL BE THE BIGGEST ONE OF THIS CYCLE. TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS. MOST PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW ME TOO LATE.

$BTC UPDATE My long on #BTC is closed My plan has changed: 1. First long zone – $64,700 (DONE) 2. Second long zone – $62,500/$61,200 (DONE) 3. There is a Head and Shoulders pattern on the 1D chart (DONE) 4. First target – $68,500/$69,400 (DONE) 5. Second target – $72K (DONE) 6. Third target – $76K (SEE EXPLANATION BELOW) 7. After that, I expect the final drop to begin in August/September. Bitcoin reached my targets within two days - this shows the strength of the market at the moment. Therefore, I’m considering the possibility of a new target. As I mentioned before, once $BTC reaches our targets, we should see an altcoin rally - and it has already started. As I said earlier, buying spot through DCA is not a bad idea. My $ETH long is still open, while my $BTC long was closed at $69K. To open a short, I need to see bearish structure first. I’m not going to try to catch a knife, so I haven’t opened a short yet. If anything changes, I’ll let you know! DYOR. REMINDER: I warned about the BTC bull trap at $82K, the summer drop, and the SPACE X decline before they even happened. MY NEXT CALL WILL BE THE BIGGEST ONE OF THIS CYCLE. TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS. MOST PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW ME TOO LATE.

Tony Research

369,848 views • 25 days ago

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

Sama Hoole

24,136 views • 4 months ago