正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Build the ultimate money printer! 💸✨ Plink Lab Trigger chain reactions, multiply balls, and watch billions explode! Pure visual spectacle, so addictive you can't stop. 🎰🔥 🎮 Check it out on Steam👇 #PlinkLab #IncrementalGame #IndieGame

Gamersky Daily Giveaways

6,676 subscribers

14,547 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

游戏 #PlinkLab #IncrementalGame #IndieGame

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Create a cozy paradise for adorable birds! 🐦🌳 Tiny Birdtopia Build habitats, relax, and collect feathered friends in this ultimate healing game! ✨ 🎮 Check it out on Steam👇 #TinyBirdtopia #CozyGames #IndieGame

Create a cozy paradise for adorable birds! 🐦🌳 Tiny Birdtopia Build habitats, relax, and collect feathered friends in this ultimate healing game! ✨ 🎮 Check it out on Steam👇 #TinyBirdtopia #CozyGames #IndieGame

Gamersky Daily Giveaways

19,632 次观看 • 1 个月前

Thought I'd have a check in Ladbrokes, see if any of the migrants are gambling, especially when it's Ramadan, and it's also against their religion to gamble. But as you can see by this video, four migrants on the gambling machines, spending taxpayers' money. So they come over here, get everything for free, all paid for by the taxpayer, and then they go and gamble it. You can't make this up. Watch the full video on YouTube channel bb_media_uk 👇 #fyp #migrants #Braintree #share

Thought I'd have a check in Ladbrokes, see if any of the migrants are gambling, especially when it's Ramadan, and it's also against their religion to gamble. But as you can see by this video, four migrants on the gambling machines, spending taxpayers' money. So they come over here, get everything for free, all paid for by the taxpayer, and then they go and gamble it. You can't make this up. Watch the full video on YouTube channel bb_media_uk 👇 #fyp #migrants #Braintree #share

BB_MEDIA

326,101 次观看 • 5 个月前

The gaming industry is growing at an exponential rate📈And the standards have grown as well!👌 Gamers want more(undeniably💪); more control of their assets, to be direct*⚡ So imagine the freedom to move hard earned assets across games & to be able to buy, sell, and trade with ease, on your terms...🪄 ... We are doing this on-chain RIGHT NOW in a way designed to make it a breeze for any gamer to just "do what they want" with their gaming assets as it should be🤷🏼‍♂️ Check it out below!🎮🔥 Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇 John cryptic NEO TOKYO Aether Studios Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin #GamingRevolution #Web3Tech

The gaming industry is growing at an exponential rate📈And the standards have grown as well!👌 Gamers want more(undeniably💪); more control of their assets, to be direct*⚡ So imagine the freedom to move hard earned assets across games & to be able to buy, sell, and trade with ease, on your terms...🪄 ... We are doing this on-chain RIGHT NOW in a way designed to make it a breeze for any gamer to just "do what they want" with their gaming assets as it should be🤷🏼‍♂️ Check it out below!🎮🔥 Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇 John cryptic NEO TOKYO Aether Studios Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin #GamingRevolution #Web3Tech

Warp Capital Guild

22,616 次观看 • 1 年前

David Tepper on why you never fight the money printer: "i don't love the us markets on a value standpoint, but i sure as heck won't be short... you can't be short anything." most guys love to play the hero. they see a chart that looks overbought, read some doom threads, and step right in front of a moving train just to prove they are smart they will sit there in a massive underwater short, paying heavy fees, while central banks literally print cash and hand it to buyers Tepper built his track record on knowing when to step aside. he knows that when governments push easy money into the system, you do not overthink the valuations when the liquidity taps turn on, you do not stand in the way. you either buy the cheapest assets on the board, or you just stay out stop trying to short a market that is floating on free cash. do not fight the fed bookmark and watch the archive here

David Tepper on why you never fight the money printer: "i don't love the us markets on a value standpoint, but i sure as heck won't be short... you can't be short anything." most guys love to play the hero. they see a chart that looks overbought, read some doom threads, and step right in front of a moving train just to prove they are smart they will sit there in a massive underwater short, paying heavy fees, while central banks literally print cash and hand it to buyers Tepper built his track record on knowing when to step aside. he knows that when governments push easy money into the system, you do not overthink the valuations when the liquidity taps turn on, you do not stand in the way. you either buy the cheapest assets on the board, or you just stay out stop trying to short a market that is floating on free cash. do not fight the fed bookmark and watch the archive here

ludoonchart

236,681 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jordan Peterson just delivered a 32-second reality check on relationships, kids, and the future that cuts straight through modern excuses: “Every single one of your ancestors reproduced in an unending procession lasting three and a half billion years… and they’re all wrong, and you’re right? I don’t think so.” He lays it out plainly: You want someone you can trust completely, tie your life to, grow old with, and (if you’re honest with yourself) build a family with. The idea that “the planet has too many people” as a reason to opt out? Peterson calls it delusion or immaturity — your entire lineage of billions succeeded at reproduction across 3.5 billion years, and now the chain stops with you? No fluff, no apologies — just a stark reminder that biology and history don’t care about current trends or talking points. What hits harder for you — the “unending procession” of ancestors, or the blunt challenge to opting out of kids?

Jordan Peterson just delivered a 32-second reality check on relationships, kids, and the future that cuts straight through modern excuses: “Every single one of your ancestors reproduced in an unending procession lasting three and a half billion years… and they’re all wrong, and you’re right? I don’t think so.” He lays it out plainly: You want someone you can trust completely, tie your life to, grow old with, and (if you’re honest with yourself) build a family with. The idea that “the planet has too many people” as a reason to opt out? Peterson calls it delusion or immaturity — your entire lineage of billions succeeded at reproduction across 3.5 billion years, and now the chain stops with you? No fluff, no apologies — just a stark reminder that biology and history don’t care about current trends or talking points. What hits harder for you — the “unending procession” of ancestors, or the blunt challenge to opting out of kids?

Camus

22,344 次观看 • 5 个月前

i watched gemma 4 12b build something genuinely impressive today, and then loop itself to death right in front of me. the full run is in the video, sped up but completely uncut, watch it to the end and you will catch the exact moment it stops building and starts looping right in the middle of the work. the task was clean, build a single file gravity simulator, n-body physics, orbits, collisions, running locally on one 3090 through an agent. and for ten minutes it was a joy to watch. it reached for a symplectic integrator on its own, the correct one, the kind that keeps orbits stable instead of spiralling out. real gravity with softening, proper orbital velocities, momentum conserved on collision. the physics was right. the thing actually worked. then on the very last step, writing a few tests to prove its own code, it fell into a loop. not a crash, a loop. it started repeating itself and would not stop. ten more minutes, thirty four thousand tokens into a single answer, the same fragments over and over, until i killed it myself. so it's not that gemma can't code. it did the hard part beautifully. it cannot finish. it cannot hold a long task together without unravelling, and finishing is the entire job in agentic work. here's the part that stings. i run this exact task, same harness, same card, on the chinese open models, qwen especially, and i never see this. they build it, they test it, they stop. every single time. google has the raw capability, you can see it sitting right there in the code, and then the model loops itself to death on a task a 27b from alibaba finishes clean. open weights, apache 2.0, so much to love on paper. i just need it to know when to stop talking.

i watched gemma 4 12b build something genuinely impressive today, and then loop itself to death right in front of me. the full run is in the video, sped up but completely uncut, watch it to the end and you will catch the exact moment it stops building and starts looping right in the middle of the work. the task was clean, build a single file gravity simulator, n-body physics, orbits, collisions, running locally on one 3090 through an agent. and for ten minutes it was a joy to watch. it reached for a symplectic integrator on its own, the correct one, the kind that keeps orbits stable instead of spiralling out. real gravity with softening, proper orbital velocities, momentum conserved on collision. the physics was right. the thing actually worked. then on the very last step, writing a few tests to prove its own code, it fell into a loop. not a crash, a loop. it started repeating itself and would not stop. ten more minutes, thirty four thousand tokens into a single answer, the same fragments over and over, until i killed it myself. so it's not that gemma can't code. it did the hard part beautifully. it cannot finish. it cannot hold a long task together without unravelling, and finishing is the entire job in agentic work. here's the part that stings. i run this exact task, same harness, same card, on the chinese open models, qwen especially, and i never see this. they build it, they test it, they stop. every single time. google has the raw capability, you can see it sitting right there in the code, and then the model loops itself to death on a task a 27b from alibaba finishes clean. open weights, apache 2.0, so much to love on paper. i just need it to know when to stop talking.

Sudo su

39,574 次观看 • 2 个月前

We sat down with two brothers living the new reality of college football. One is at Ohio State. One is at Georgia… and they’re getting paid. But the money part isn’t the full story — and Luke Montgomery and Ryan Montgomery share that story with tremendous depth. What stuck with me from our conversation was what happens when you’re 17 and the world starts treating you like a business. Who do you trust? How do you not get played? How do you build the right circle before the wrong people build it for you? If you’re an athlete, a parent, a coach, or you’re just trying to understand what NIL actually changed behind the scenes… this one’s for you. Watch the latest Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth episode as it is fueled by our founding sponsor 76 — keeping you on the GO GO GO so you never miss a beat. Be sure to visit Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth and check out the full episode on YouTube 🔗👇

We sat down with two brothers living the new reality of college football. One is at Ohio State. One is at Georgia… and they’re getting paid. But the money part isn’t the full story — and Luke Montgomery and Ryan Montgomery share that story with tremendous depth. What stuck with me from our conversation was what happens when you’re 17 and the world starts treating you like a business. Who do you trust? How do you not get played? How do you build the right circle before the wrong people build it for you? If you’re an athlete, a parent, a coach, or you’re just trying to understand what NIL actually changed behind the scenes… this one’s for you. Watch the latest Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth episode as it is fueled by our founding sponsor 76 — keeping you on the GO GO GO so you never miss a beat. Be sure to visit Y-Option Podcast: College Football with Yogi Roth and check out the full episode on YouTube 🔗👇

Yogi Roth

37,176 次观看 • 2 个月前

Introducing Buccaneer. Ethereum's first and only private currency. Watch how it breaks a trail and funds a brand new wallet with ETH, without paying gas fees in ETH, all in under 5 minutes. Most importantly of all, this is happening completely on-chain. No L2s, no roll-ups. Just an ERC20 token and some contracts. This project has achieved what every other privacy project could only dream of, funded with just $750k years ago from a loyal, tight knit community to accomplish this. Nobody even knows this exists yet. Ethereum is no longer an open, transparent network. This protocol cannot be taken down or stopped, it lives entirely within Ethereum alongside a DApp capable of running on IPFS. This is the ultimate censorship resistance. It is impossible to stop the flow of money in and out of this. The possibilities and implications of this technology are only just beginning to be explored. The protocol is live and fully operational. Check it out: Welcome to privacy.

Buccaneer VSTARK

16,143 次观看 • 1 年前

We have been chasing the most violent storms on earth together for over 25 years. Now, we are bringing the ultimate intercept to the BIG SCREEN. 🌪️🎥 I am beyond excited to announce that NEVER STOP CHASING is hitting theaters nationwide on August 21! Huge thanks to Deadline for breaking the news this morning. You can read the exclusive announcement and watch the full official trailer here: Directed by my longtime chase partner Ken Cole, this documentary takes you directly inside the bear's cage. We mastered the entire film in Dolby Vision and immersive Dolby Atmos sound so you can actually feel the roar of a massive wedge tornado right in your theater seat. This is the real deal, and I can't wait for you to experience it with us. Check out for updates and theater info! #NeverStopChasing #StormChasing #Dominator #Tornado#Dominator #Tornado

We have been chasing the most violent storms on earth together for over 25 years. Now, we are bringing the ultimate intercept to the BIG SCREEN. 🌪️🎥 I am beyond excited to announce that NEVER STOP CHASING is hitting theaters nationwide on August 21! Huge thanks to Deadline for breaking the news this morning. You can read the exclusive announcement and watch the full official trailer here: Directed by my longtime chase partner Ken Cole, this documentary takes you directly inside the bear's cage. We mastered the entire film in Dolby Vision and immersive Dolby Atmos sound so you can actually feel the roar of a massive wedge tornado right in your theater seat. This is the real deal, and I can't wait for you to experience it with us. Check out for updates and theater info! #NeverStopChasing #StormChasing #Dominator #Tornado#Dominator #Tornado

Reed Timmer, PhD

641,146 次观看 • 1 个月前

I tracked a Polymarket wallet that turned $42K into $450K in hours. 🤯 I reverse-engineered their exact strategy, cloned their trades, and made $87,000. Stop gambling based on news. Insiders are already front-running you. Give me 2 minutes, and I’ll teach you the exact 4-step framework to track smart money. Bookmark this so you don't lose it: 🧵👇 1️⃣ Filter the Sharks 🦈 Don't look at luck; look at 30-day consistency. Target wallets with >55% win rates and massive PnL ratios in high-liquidity markets. 2️⃣ Decode the Entries 🔍 Track the Top Holders. Are they building huge positions before the news breaks? Positions are information. Early, aggressive sizing is your ultimate signal. 3️⃣ Identify the Edge 🧠 Pure luck is random. Structural edge is organized. Look for wallets that dominate one specific niche and exit precisely to lock in trends, not marginal gains. 4️⃣ Track the Anomalies 🚨 Cross-reference fund flows, gas spikes, and sudden volume in dead markets. Combine on-chain data with real-world flight trackers or schedules. On-chain data is public, but the alpha is hidden in the patterns. Master this, or stay exit liquidity.

I tracked a Polymarket wallet that turned $42K into $450K in hours. 🤯 I reverse-engineered their exact strategy, cloned their trades, and made $87,000. Stop gambling based on news. Insiders are already front-running you. Give me 2 minutes, and I’ll teach you the exact 4-step framework to track smart money. Bookmark this so you don't lose it: 🧵👇 1️⃣ Filter the Sharks 🦈 Don't look at luck; look at 30-day consistency. Target wallets with >55% win rates and massive PnL ratios in high-liquidity markets. 2️⃣ Decode the Entries 🔍 Track the Top Holders. Are they building huge positions before the news breaks? Positions are information. Early, aggressive sizing is your ultimate signal. 3️⃣ Identify the Edge 🧠 Pure luck is random. Structural edge is organized. Look for wallets that dominate one specific niche and exit precisely to lock in trends, not marginal gains. 4️⃣ Track the Anomalies 🚨 Cross-reference fund flows, gas spikes, and sudden volume in dead markets. Combine on-chain data with real-world flight trackers or schedules. On-chain data is public, but the alpha is hidden in the patterns. Master this, or stay exit liquidity.

Shawn

60,299 次观看 • 5 个月前

Everyone ranks L2s by TVL. But it’s the laziest scoreboard in crypto. It tells you where money is sitting, not who’s actually winning. Here’s what I look for 👇🏻 ◢ TVL = Vanity Metric Parked capital is not a business. A chain can hold billions in deposits and still bleed money every month covering its own costs. TVL measures where liquidity is camping today, not whether the chain earns, profits, or survives a real bear. for years we ranked these networks by the one number that says the least about their survival. ◢ The Pie Is Shrinking Here’s the part nobody says out loud. Total L2 revenue has been falling, not growing. After Dencun crushed data costs in 2024, fees collapsed with them, and the money these chains collectively earn dropped hard from its peak. So, this stopped being a land grab a while ago. It’s now a fight for share of a market that’s actively getting smaller, which changes everything about who actually wins. ◢ Rented Users Don't Count In a shrinking market, only one question matters: can you get users without paying for them. Incentives, airdrops, points farms, none of that is growth, it’s renting volume by the day. The second the rewards stop, the mercenaries leave and the chain goes silent. We already watched it happen to 50+ rollups that are functionally dead now, billions in “TVL” that vanished the moment emissions dried up. ◢ Distribution Beat Tech The one chain that actually solved this didn’t out-engineer anyone. The tech is good, not magic. What it really did was plug into a userbase it already owned and route millions of verified accounts onto the chain by default, at zero acquisition cost. Distribution beat technology, again. It's the most repeated lesson in this entire industry and still the one founders refuse to learn. ◢ The Real Ranking Stack the three majors up by who earns, who profits, and who keeps their users, instead of who has the most money parked on them, and the ranking flips from the one everyone repeats. I put them side by side in the video with the revenue, the profit, the users, and a flat verdict on each. So, in a market that’s contracting, would you rather own the chain with the most capital sitting on it, or the one that still earns when every incentive in crypto finally switches off?

Everyone ranks L2s by TVL. But it’s the laziest scoreboard in crypto. It tells you where money is sitting, not who’s actually winning. Here’s what I look for 👇🏻 ◢ TVL = Vanity Metric Parked capital is not a business. A chain can hold billions in deposits and still bleed money every month covering its own costs. TVL measures where liquidity is camping today, not whether the chain earns, profits, or survives a real bear. for years we ranked these networks by the one number that says the least about their survival. ◢ The Pie Is Shrinking Here’s the part nobody says out loud. Total L2 revenue has been falling, not growing. After Dencun crushed data costs in 2024, fees collapsed with them, and the money these chains collectively earn dropped hard from its peak. So, this stopped being a land grab a while ago. It’s now a fight for share of a market that’s actively getting smaller, which changes everything about who actually wins. ◢ Rented Users Don't Count In a shrinking market, only one question matters: can you get users without paying for them. Incentives, airdrops, points farms, none of that is growth, it’s renting volume by the day. The second the rewards stop, the mercenaries leave and the chain goes silent. We already watched it happen to 50+ rollups that are functionally dead now, billions in “TVL” that vanished the moment emissions dried up. ◢ Distribution Beat Tech The one chain that actually solved this didn’t out-engineer anyone. The tech is good, not magic. What it really did was plug into a userbase it already owned and route millions of verified accounts onto the chain by default, at zero acquisition cost. Distribution beat technology, again. It's the most repeated lesson in this entire industry and still the one founders refuse to learn. ◢ The Real Ranking Stack the three majors up by who earns, who profits, and who keeps their users, instead of who has the most money parked on them, and the ranking flips from the one everyone repeats. I put them side by side in the video with the revenue, the profit, the users, and a flat verdict on each. So, in a market that’s contracting, would you rather own the chain with the most capital sitting on it, or the one that still earns when every incentive in crypto finally switches off?

Onur 🍌🦍

17,447 次观看 • 2 个月前

Wall Street burns billions trying to predict Bitcoin. A 28-year-old self-taught coder in Warsaw made $377,000 by not even trying. He'd lost money on three trading bots before this one. Each looked perfect on paper, then started losing money the moment he ran it for real market. So he built bot that doesn't trust itself. His wallet: The truth is simple: you can't predict the next five minutes of Bitcoin. It's a coin flip. Anyone selling you a "prediction" is selling you nothing. So he stopped predicting. The bot hunts the moments the crowd is wrong instead. Here's the part that makes the money, and it's the opposite of what everyone builds. Any strategy can be made to look amazing on past data. On a 5-minute chart, most of them are just lucky, not real - and they stop working fast. So the bot treats every strategy it finds as fake until it proves otherwise. Each one has to pass a hard test: > test it on old data → test it on data it's never seen → try to break it on purpose → cut it down to the one thing that matters → run it forward → keep it only if it still works Last round, 10 of its 12 "winning" strategies turned out to be fake. It kept the 2 that actually worked and dropped the rest. And it never stops - building, testing, and dumping strategies around the clock. What worked yesterday can stop working today, so the second one starts losing, it gets cut before it costs you a thing. The result: $433,000 across 2,955 trades All his old bots tried to be right. This one just tries to catch itself being wrong - and that's why it's still alive. Bookmark this article below - it's the breakdown that explains why your last bot died. It's pruning and trading right now. Copy its wallet and skip to the edges that survived:

Wall Street burns billions trying to predict Bitcoin. A 28-year-old self-taught coder in Warsaw made $377,000 by not even trying. He'd lost money on three trading bots before this one. Each looked perfect on paper, then started losing money the moment he ran it for real market. So he built bot that doesn't trust itself. His wallet: The truth is simple: you can't predict the next five minutes of Bitcoin. It's a coin flip. Anyone selling you a "prediction" is selling you nothing. So he stopped predicting. The bot hunts the moments the crowd is wrong instead. Here's the part that makes the money, and it's the opposite of what everyone builds. Any strategy can be made to look amazing on past data. On a 5-minute chart, most of them are just lucky, not real - and they stop working fast. So the bot treats every strategy it finds as fake until it proves otherwise. Each one has to pass a hard test: > test it on old data → test it on data it's never seen → try to break it on purpose → cut it down to the one thing that matters → run it forward → keep it only if it still works Last round, 10 of its 12 "winning" strategies turned out to be fake. It kept the 2 that actually worked and dropped the rest. And it never stops - building, testing, and dumping strategies around the clock. What worked yesterday can stop working today, so the second one starts losing, it gets cut before it costs you a thing. The result: $433,000 across 2,955 trades All his old bots tried to be right. This one just tries to catch itself being wrong - and that's why it's still alive. Bookmark this article below - it's the breakdown that explains why your last bot died. It's pruning and trading right now. Copy its wallet and skip to the edges that survived:

cvxv666

27,854 次观看 • 1 个月前

🌉✨ Bridging made EASY on #PulseChain! In this tutorial we show how to use Liberty Swap | C.R.O.P.S. on PulseChain + OKX Wallet to bridge USDC (BSC → PulseChain) in just a few clicks 🔥 LibertySwap = the BIGGEST cross-chain swaps on PulseChain 💪 And the best part? You can now swap USDC (BASE/ARB/BSC/ETH) or USDT (BSC/ETH) straight into $MOONX 🚀🌕 Shoutout to the LibertySwap team for building nonstop 🙌 ⚡ Don’t just watch—try it out yourself. You can now bridge your assets over in MINUTES! ⏱️💸 👉 Start bridging today & join the #MOONX movement! #PulseChain #PLS #DeFi #AsianOnPulse #MOONX

🌉✨ Bridging made EASY on #PulseChain! In this tutorial we show how to use Liberty Swap | C.R.O.P.S. on PulseChain + OKX Wallet to bridge USDC (BSC → PulseChain) in just a few clicks 🔥 LibertySwap = the BIGGEST cross-chain swaps on PulseChain 💪 And the best part? You can now swap USDC (BASE/ARB/BSC/ETH) or USDT (BSC/ETH) straight into $MOONX 🚀🌕 Shoutout to the LibertySwap team for building nonstop 🙌 ⚡ Don’t just watch—try it out yourself. You can now bridge your assets over in MINUTES! ⏱️💸 👉 Start bridging today & join the #MOONX movement! #PulseChain #PLS #DeFi #AsianOnPulse #MOONX

AsianOnPulse｜PulseChain

25,638 次观看 • 11 个月前

🟠Stop holding stablecoins - WATCH THIS INSTEAD Buidlpad just announced the 4th community sale project - @FalconStable Falcon Finance ( $FF ). It is designed to make your digital dollars actually productive 💸 Here’s why I’m so excited: ✨ It’s backed by DWF Labs, a HUGE crypto market maker 💰 You can see their reserves ($654M+) on a public dashboard. Total transparency 🚀 The staking system is super simple to use 🔒 You can lock your stake to boost your returns even higher The subscription opens on 19th Sep, just 2 days to go, so you need to be ready for this 🗓️ 🟠Check it out on here: #DeFi #Stablecoin #YieldFarming #CryptoStaking #PassiveIncome #CryptoInvesting #FalconFinance #Buidlpad #USDF #DWFLabs #CryptoYield #DecentralizedFinance #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #Blockchain #Investing #Finance #MoneyHacks #Fintech #Tech #Altcoin #FalconFinance #BUIDLPAD #Launchpad

🟠Stop holding stablecoins - WATCH THIS INSTEAD Buidlpad just announced the 4th community sale project - @FalconStable Falcon Finance ( $FF ). It is designed to make your digital dollars actually productive 💸 Here’s why I’m so excited: ✨ It’s backed by DWF Labs, a HUGE crypto market maker 💰 You can see their reserves ($654M+) on a public dashboard. Total transparency 🚀 The staking system is super simple to use 🔒 You can lock your stake to boost your returns even higher The subscription opens on 19th Sep, just 2 days to go, so you need to be ready for this 🗓️ 🟠Check it out on here: #DeFi #Stablecoin #YieldFarming #CryptoStaking #PassiveIncome #CryptoInvesting #FalconFinance #Buidlpad #USDF #DWFLabs #CryptoYield #DecentralizedFinance #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #Blockchain #Investing #Finance #MoneyHacks #Fintech #Tech #Altcoin #FalconFinance #BUIDLPAD #Launchpad

𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙰🩵

24,247 次观看 • 11 个月前

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

TBPN

384,058 次观看 • 6 个月前

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

TBPN

34,529 次观看 • 5 个月前

1 screenshot → Millions $ He feeds one screenshot into Claude and gets hypnotic bunker videos that dominate feeds. The method is stupidly clean: He screenshots a viral reference → feeds it into Claude Code → gets 10 refined prompts + images from Nano Banana → tells Claude to run it on Kling 3.0 → and out comes a hypnotic bunker build video that people watch on repeat. No face. No filming. No complex editing. Just pure satisfying AI content that hooks millions. While most people are still making basic explainer videos... Smart bros are dominating with these hyper-addictive transformation niches that YouTube and TikTok push like crazy. This exact style is quietly becoming one of the strongest faceless money printers in 2026. Most will watch this, think “cool”, and do nothing. If this gave you that “I need to test this” rush… smash like and follow me. I only drop this level of raw, working alpha here.

1 screenshot → Millions $ He feeds one screenshot into Claude and gets hypnotic bunker videos that dominate feeds. The method is stupidly clean: He screenshots a viral reference → feeds it into Claude Code → gets 10 refined prompts + images from Nano Banana → tells Claude to run it on Kling 3.0 → and out comes a hypnotic bunker build video that people watch on repeat. No face. No filming. No complex editing. Just pure satisfying AI content that hooks millions. While most people are still making basic explainer videos... Smart bros are dominating with these hyper-addictive transformation niches that YouTube and TikTok push like crazy. This exact style is quietly becoming one of the strongest faceless money printers in 2026. Most will watch this, think “cool”, and do nothing. If this gave you that “I need to test this” rush… smash like and follow me. I only drop this level of raw, working alpha here.

Frogify

54,608 次观看 • 2 个月前

Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale reveals exact chain of events after 9/11 that made him and Peter Thiel realize they had to build Palantir "At PayPal we had to stop the Chinese and Russian mafia from stealing all of our money. So we got to know all the guys who were helping us arrest the bad guys, the Secret Service and the FBI. And right after this happened, it was 9/11" "These guys were spending billions of dollars on stuff that we thought didn't make any sense. They kept asking us for advice. They were confused about how to do things" "When you create a new department, people can't really fire people in government easily, so sometimes they'll have a lot of people they wanted to fire and then instead they just pushed them into the new department. So it was a bit of a mess" "It became really obvious to us that Silicon Valley, Google, PayPal, all these things were just way ahead technically of where the government was at that point" "The government was spending $38 billion a year gathering data, looking at the data, failing to stop the terrorists, but also abusing our civil liberties" "We said, there's actually a really important problem here to solve. I'd like to stop the bad guys from attacking us again. And I don't want everyone in the government seeing all of my data without any controls. That's crazy"

Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale reveals exact chain of events after 9/11 that made him and Peter Thiel realize they had to build Palantir "At PayPal we had to stop the Chinese and Russian mafia from stealing all of our money. So we got to know all the guys who were helping us arrest the bad guys, the Secret Service and the FBI. And right after this happened, it was 9/11" "These guys were spending billions of dollars on stuff that we thought didn't make any sense. They kept asking us for advice. They were confused about how to do things" "When you create a new department, people can't really fire people in government easily, so sometimes they'll have a lot of people they wanted to fire and then instead they just pushed them into the new department. So it was a bit of a mess" "It became really obvious to us that Silicon Valley, Google, PayPal, all these things were just way ahead technically of where the government was at that point" "The government was spending $38 billion a year gathering data, looking at the data, failing to stop the terrorists, but also abusing our civil liberties" "We said, there's actually a really important problem here to solve. I'd like to stop the bad guys from attacking us again. And I don't want everyone in the government seeing all of my data without any controls. That's crazy"

Jaynit

92,768 次观看 • 1 个月前

Wow. Classic Jensen style, he ended the Nvidia vs. custom ASIC competition for good. 🫡 The level of confidence with which he explains. 🎯 He was answering to UBS research analyst question on how custom ASICs will affect NVIDIA or how they are going to compete with custom ASIC. Basically he says - Your custom chip is a science project in a world where NVIDIA is building revenue-generating AI factories. While the competition is still desperately trying to copy Nvidia's last generation, their roadmap is already at the limits of physics. They don't just sell silicon; they deliver the entire, impossibly complex platform that the industry has already surrendered to and standardized on. When you must bet hundreds of billions on your company's future, there is no alternative—they are the only platform to build on, and everyone knows it. Full transcript below. Question by the Analyst - "Jensen, I wanted to ask about customer ASIC. And I ask because if, you know, we listen to some of the same CSPs that you put up on that slide, and we listen to some of the companies who are making custom ASICs, some of the deployment numbers sound pretty big. So, I wanted to just hear your position, how you're going to compete with custom ASICs, how they can possibly compete with you, and maybe how some of your conversations with these same customers would sort of form your view in terms of how competitive custom ASIC will be to you." Jensen's response "First of all, just because something gets built doesn't mean it's great. Number two, if it's not great, all of those companies are run by great CEOs who are really good at math. And because these are AI factories, it affects your revenues, not just your costs. It affects your revenues, not just your cost. It's a different calculus. Every company only has so much power. You just have to ask them. Every single company only has so much power, and within that power, you have to maximize your revenues, not just your cost. So this is a new game. This is not a data center game, this is an AI factory game. So when the time comes, that simple calculus, as I was using yesterday, that simple math that I was showing yesterday, still has to be done. Which is the reason why so many projects are started and so many are not taken into production. Because there's always another alternative. We are the other alternative, and that alternative is excellent. Not normal excellent, as you know. Everybody's still trying to catch up to Hopper. I haven't seen a competitor to Hopper yet. And here we're talking about 40x more. And so our roadmap is at the limits of what's possible. Not to mention we're really good at it and completely dedicated to it. A lot of people have a lot of businesses to do. I've got this one business to do. And we're all in on this. 35,000 people doing one job. Been doing it for a long time. The depth of capability, the scope of technology, as you saw yesterday, is pretty incredible. And it's not about building a chip; it's building an AI factory. We're talking about scale up, scale out. We're talking about networking and switches and software. We're talking about systems, and these system architectures are insane. Even the systems themselves. Notice, 100% of the computer industry, 100% of the computer industry has standardized on NVIDIA's system. Why? Because try to build an alternative. Building the alternative is not even thinkable because look at how much investment we put into building this one. And so even the system's hard. What people used to think, system is just sheet metal. Hardly sheet metal. 600,000 parts, it's hardly sheet metal. And so all of the technology is hard. We're pushing every single dimension to the limit because we're talking about so much money. The world is going to lay down hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in the next just a couple of two, three years. Let's do the thought experiment. Let's say you want to stand up a data center and you want it to be fully operational in two years' time. When do you have to place the PO on that? Today. So let's suppose you have to place a hundred billion dollar PO on something. What architecture would you place it on, literally based on everything you have today? There's only one. You can't reasonably build out giant infrastructures with hundreds of billions of dollars behind it, hoping to turn it back on and to get the ROIC on it, unless you have the confidence that we are able to provide you. And we can provide you complete confidence. And singularly so. We're the only technology company where if I had to go place a hundred billion dollars on an AI factory... Oh, that's interesting, I did. Literally the only company who's willing to place hundred billion dollar POs across the industry to go build it out. And you guys know, that's our, that's the depth of our supply chain. And we are, and we have. Give me another. Give me another one that has that depth and that length. And now to the point where we've got to go and work with the supply chain upstream and downstream to prepare the world for hundreds of billions of dollars working towards trillions of dollars of AI infrastructure build-out. Our partnerships with power companies and all of the cooling companies, the Vertivs, the Schneiders, our partnerships with BlackRock... The partnership network necessary to prepare the world to go build out trillions of dollars of AI infrastructure, that's undergoing as we speak. What architecture and what ASIC chip do you go select? That doesn't even make sense. It's a weird conversation even. And so, I think that one, the game is quite large. The investment level, therefore the risk level, is quite high. And so the certainty that you're selecting the best is quite important. And the certainty that you can execute, vital. We are the company you can build on top of. We're the company, we're the platform that you can build your AI infrastructure on. And we're the company that you can build your AI infrastructure strategy on. And so, I think it includes chips, but it's much, much more than that." --- From 'GTC Financial Analyst Q&A' session (full link in comment)

Wow. Classic Jensen style, he ended the Nvidia vs. custom ASIC competition for good. 🫡 The level of confidence with which he explains. 🎯 He was answering to UBS research analyst question on how custom ASICs will affect NVIDIA or how they are going to compete with custom ASIC. Basically he says - Your custom chip is a science project in a world where NVIDIA is building revenue-generating AI factories. While the competition is still desperately trying to copy Nvidia's last generation, their roadmap is already at the limits of physics. They don't just sell silicon; they deliver the entire, impossibly complex platform that the industry has already surrendered to and standardized on. When you must bet hundreds of billions on your company's future, there is no alternative—they are the only platform to build on, and everyone knows it. Full transcript below. Question by the Analyst - "Jensen, I wanted to ask about customer ASIC. And I ask because if, you know, we listen to some of the same CSPs that you put up on that slide, and we listen to some of the companies who are making custom ASICs, some of the deployment numbers sound pretty big. So, I wanted to just hear your position, how you're going to compete with custom ASICs, how they can possibly compete with you, and maybe how some of your conversations with these same customers would sort of form your view in terms of how competitive custom ASIC will be to you." Jensen's response "First of all, just because something gets built doesn't mean it's great. Number two, if it's not great, all of those companies are run by great CEOs who are really good at math. And because these are AI factories, it affects your revenues, not just your costs. It affects your revenues, not just your cost. It's a different calculus. Every company only has so much power. You just have to ask them. Every single company only has so much power, and within that power, you have to maximize your revenues, not just your cost. So this is a new game. This is not a data center game, this is an AI factory game. So when the time comes, that simple calculus, as I was using yesterday, that simple math that I was showing yesterday, still has to be done. Which is the reason why so many projects are started and so many are not taken into production. Because there's always another alternative. We are the other alternative, and that alternative is excellent. Not normal excellent, as you know. Everybody's still trying to catch up to Hopper. I haven't seen a competitor to Hopper yet. And here we're talking about 40x more. And so our roadmap is at the limits of what's possible. Not to mention we're really good at it and completely dedicated to it. A lot of people have a lot of businesses to do. I've got this one business to do. And we're all in on this. 35,000 people doing one job. Been doing it for a long time. The depth of capability, the scope of technology, as you saw yesterday, is pretty incredible. And it's not about building a chip; it's building an AI factory. We're talking about scale up, scale out. We're talking about networking and switches and software. We're talking about systems, and these system architectures are insane. Even the systems themselves. Notice, 100% of the computer industry, 100% of the computer industry has standardized on NVIDIA's system. Why? Because try to build an alternative. Building the alternative is not even thinkable because look at how much investment we put into building this one. And so even the system's hard. What people used to think, system is just sheet metal. Hardly sheet metal. 600,000 parts, it's hardly sheet metal. And so all of the technology is hard. We're pushing every single dimension to the limit because we're talking about so much money. The world is going to lay down hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in the next just a couple of two, three years. Let's do the thought experiment. Let's say you want to stand up a data center and you want it to be fully operational in two years' time. When do you have to place the PO on that? Today. So let's suppose you have to place a hundred billion dollar PO on something. What architecture would you place it on, literally based on everything you have today? There's only one. You can't reasonably build out giant infrastructures with hundreds of billions of dollars behind it, hoping to turn it back on and to get the ROIC on it, unless you have the confidence that we are able to provide you. And we can provide you complete confidence. And singularly so. We're the only technology company where if I had to go place a hundred billion dollars on an AI factory... Oh, that's interesting, I did. Literally the only company who's willing to place hundred billion dollar POs across the industry to go build it out. And you guys know, that's our, that's the depth of our supply chain. And we are, and we have. Give me another. Give me another one that has that depth and that length. And now to the point where we've got to go and work with the supply chain upstream and downstream to prepare the world for hundreds of billions of dollars working towards trillions of dollars of AI infrastructure build-out. Our partnerships with power companies and all of the cooling companies, the Vertivs, the Schneiders, our partnerships with BlackRock... The partnership network necessary to prepare the world to go build out trillions of dollars of AI infrastructure, that's undergoing as we speak. What architecture and what ASIC chip do you go select? That doesn't even make sense. It's a weird conversation even. And so, I think that one, the game is quite large. The investment level, therefore the risk level, is quite high. And so the certainty that you're selecting the best is quite important. And the certainty that you can execute, vital. We are the company you can build on top of. We're the company, we're the platform that you can build your AI infrastructure on. And we're the company that you can build your AI infrastructure strategy on. And so, I think it includes chips, but it's much, much more than that." --- From 'GTC Financial Analyst Q&A' session (full link in comment)

Rohan Paul

208,032 次观看 • 9 个月前

Andrew Huberman & David Goggins drop a brutal truth on wealth, friction & willpower: Huberman: "The children of wealthy people are a case study in how not having enough friction can destroy a life." Too much comfort → no need to grind → lives that dwindle or plateau at "successful enough." The engine runs on the stick, the haunt, the internal fire. Give that up and you're done. Goggins fires back: "Everything I've ever done, I didn't want to do. Every day. I'm a lazy piece of shit... and one of the hardest-working people on earth." He built unbreakable willpower by forcing himself through what he hated. Now it won't let him stop—even at 49 with broken knees. The body says "you still can," so he runs. Stop once, and that muscle dies. "Most people don't want to build it because it's scary—it unlocks who you really are... and it's not a pretty journey." Friction isn't the enemy. It's the forge. Remove it (money, safety nets, no consequences) and you stay soft. Embrace it deliberately, and you become something most people can't even comprehend. 3:54 clip of two titans breaking down why comfort kills and pain builds legends 👇 What's the one piece of "friction" in your life that keeps you sharp? Or the comfort you're tempted to drop that might actually be holding you back?

Andrew Huberman & David Goggins drop a brutal truth on wealth, friction & willpower: Huberman: "The children of wealthy people are a case study in how not having enough friction can destroy a life." Too much comfort → no need to grind → lives that dwindle or plateau at "successful enough." The engine runs on the stick, the haunt, the internal fire. Give that up and you're done. Goggins fires back: "Everything I've ever done, I didn't want to do. Every day. I'm a lazy piece of shit... and one of the hardest-working people on earth." He built unbreakable willpower by forcing himself through what he hated. Now it won't let him stop—even at 49 with broken knees. The body says "you still can," so he runs. Stop once, and that muscle dies. "Most people don't want to build it because it's scary—it unlocks who you really are... and it's not a pretty journey." Friction isn't the enemy. It's the forge. Remove it (money, safety nets, no consequences) and you stay soft. Embrace it deliberately, and you become something most people can't even comprehend. 3:54 clip of two titans breaking down why comfort kills and pain builds legends 👇 What's the one piece of "friction" in your life that keeps you sharp? Or the comfort you're tempted to drop that might actually be holding you back?

Camus

307,567 次观看 • 7 个月前