Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Building modern interfaces shouldn't mean complex libraries or poor performance. Introducing Ecliptix, a minimal, accessible UI library, designed for developers who care about smooth user experiences. Thanks Harkirat Singh for the inspiring projects video! Explore, link in comments👇

31,473 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We’re excited to introduce AgentAuth—the comprehensive auth solution designed for AI agents! We understand the pain every developer experiences regarding authentication—managing OAuth flows for Gmail, handling API keys for Linear, or setting up permissions across multiple services. It's complex enough with traditional apps. However, AI agents add an extra layer of complexity. Traditional auth solutions were not designed with this agent-specific requirement in mind. Think about it—say you're building an agent to pull data from Salesforce, send updates through Slack, and log issues in GitHub. Each service requires different authentication—OAuth2, API keys, you name it—and your agent needs to work seamlessly on your users' behalf. Building and managing all that is a massive headache, right? That’s precisely where AgentAuth by comes in. • It supports 250+ apps across categories such as CRMs, ticketing, productivity, etc. • Compatible with 15+ Agentic Frameworks, including , LlamaIndex 🦙, CrewAI etc • Offers self-hosting and white-labeling options. • Provides a unified dashboard to monitor user accounts. It takes care of all the complex authentication flows—OAuth, API Key, Basic, JWT, token refresh, and more—in the backend, so you can focus on building what truly matters for your users. This is ideal for AI developers building real-world AI automation involving multiple application interactions. Check out AgentAuth now -

Karan Vaidya

110,979 views • 1 year ago

AG-UI makes building agentic applications dramatically easier. Here's how it works. This is a model for a simple chatbot: User → LLM → Response But interactive agents that render UI, pause for approvals, and ask users for input need a much more complex model. When building these agents, a response from the LLM will include a series of state changes as the agent runs: • Agent started a task • Agent called a tool • Agent updated its state • Agent streams these tokens • Agent is waiting on a human • Agent is resuming the task The Agent-User Interaction Protocol (AG-UI) treats the LLM response as a stream of events rather than a text endpoint. In practice, here is what you get as an agent runs: 1. Lifecycle events so your UI knows where the agent is. 2. Text messages that stream tokens. 3. Tool calls so your UI can prefill a form with any required arguments. 4. State updates that keep your UI in sync with the agent. 5. Special events for human approvals, rich media, and custom needs. All of these events travel over standard transports (SSE, WebSockets, or plain HTTP) as JSON. As a result, you can build a frontend that stays in sync with the agent's progress without having to invent a custom process to make this happen. For example, building a human-in-the-loop workflow becomes an off-the-shelf component you can integrate rather than build from scratch. CopilotKit🪁 is the creator of AG-UI, and you can use it when building frontend applications pretty much anywhere: • React • Angular • Vue • React Native • Slack • Teams • Discord • WhatsApp • Telegram Here is the link for you to check it out: Thanks to the CopilotKit team for partnering with me on this post.

Santiago

17,438 views • 28 days ago

Introducing Automata Builder Grants ✧ ​ TEEs and remote attestation mechanisms are vital to building a Web3 with strong guarantees of confidentiality and integrity. ​ We're excited to announce the 2 Grant programs to provide targeted funding for projects building in these 2 verticals: ​ Automata Developer Grant ​ Aimed at builders who are using TEEs to push the boundaries of innovation. ​ Grant Details ​ ▶︎ Funding: Up to 50,000 USDC or its equivalent in ATA. ▶︎ Duration: Projects should aim for short to medium-term timelines (within six months). ▶︎ Support: Alongside funding, developers will receive marketing resources, visibility within the ecosystem, and optional technical support. ▶︎ Application Process: Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis, with projects broken down into milestones for incremental funding. ​ Automata Attestation Grant ​ Tailored for developers and teams that are actively working on attestation-enabled projects within the Automata ecosystem. ​ Grant Details ​ ▶︎ Funding: Up to 10,000 $ATA, distributed progressively based on attestation usage. ▶︎ Support: In addition to funding, the grant provides marketing resources, increased ecosystem visibility, and technical support for attestation-related projects. ▶︎ Application Process: Developers can apply by submitting their attestation use case and progress. Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis. ​ We're excited to announce the first round of Attestation Grant recipients: ​ 01node Validator 0Y Aestus Relay Bella Protocol BlockPI Chainbase Staking 🥩 (💜,💛) cp0x.com DAIC Capital DSRV Dogs with nodes EigenYields Everstake HashKey Cloud InfraSingularity InfStones Global KudasaiJP🇯🇵🧡 Kukis Global Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝 LinkPool MatrixedLink moonli.me Nodes.Guru P-OPS Team P2P.org Pier Two Ryabina validator stakefish Stakely @staketab staking4all ​ As the machine attestation layer built on the Superchain, developers, and teams building in the Automata ecosystem are also eligible to apply for Optimism Collective Grants: ​ Start shipping today ​ Interested developers can read the full announcement for further details on the application process: ​

Automata Network

32,718 views • 1 year ago

consistency ≠ uniformity: for those who haven't lived through this era – we used to have beautiful, precision interfaces. now they're replaced by a design language that originated from the Apple Watch, with icons that only fit in squircles. but that's not even the point. the point is we used to design the whole stack – the technology, the concepts, the interfaces. when designers only care about superficial consistency, platforms lose their uniqueness. apple used to design systems. skeuomorphism wasn't just about leather textures – it was about teaching people new mental models. the trash can empties because you understand what a trash can does. aqua's lickable buttons and sheets had depth because the OS had layers you could understand. the old apple designed the whole stack – from metal to pixels to concepts. teams weren't just shipping features in the same box, they were building coherent platforms each with opinions about what computing should feel like for the medium. liquid glass is fine on a phone. but on macOS it's unusable – lack of precision, visual noise everywhere. this is what happens when UI language designed for fingers bleed into macOS. we went from interfaces designed for a 27" cinema display with a precise cursor to interfaces designed for a 1.5" screen you tap with one finger. the Mac is for creation and precision work. it needs information density. it needs chrome you can grab. it needs UI that gets out of your way but gives you power when you need it. instead we got padding and whitespace and translucent blurs optimized for touch targets nobody's touching. the squircle icon mandate is a symptom. when you force every icon into the same shape, you're saying "brand consistency" matters more than "each app icon needs to communicate its function instantly." we traded clarity for uniformity. we traded precise design for cross-platform sameness. consistency means your system has coherent rules within itself. uniformity means everything looks the same regardless of context. the hardware team still gets it – that macbook pro + M-series chips, chef's kiss. but software design feels like it's chasing fat fingers instead of remembering what people do on a Mac.

Ryo Lu

716,685 views • 7 months ago