Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

bumassburner

Best_Leaks0's profile picture

BestLeaks

13,479 subscribers

586,738 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Election Special 4: The Conservatives.
4:51

Election Special 4: The Conservatives.

Jonathan Pie

9,436,541 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Congrats to Megan Rapinoe on one of the most unhinged, dishonest statements ever made on The View. That's quite an accomplishment!
5:40

Congrats to Megan Rapinoe on one of the most unhinged, dishonest statements ever made on The View. That's quite an accomplishment!

Brandi Kruse

28,401 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

NFL legend Marshawn Lynch had the whole room CONFUSED after randomly pulling out a bottle of HENNESSY from his pocket while he was in the middle of explaining how he became a World Cup photographer 💀🤣🍾 “My Uncle told me ‘drink some Hennessy and do some sh*t you never done before.’” “Where did you spawn a bottle of Hennessy from?” 😭
2:40

NFL legend Marshawn Lynch had the whole room CONFUSED after randomly pulling out a bottle of HENNESSY from his pocket while he was in the middle of explaining how he became a World Cup photographer 💀🤣🍾 “My Uncle told me ‘drink some Hennessy and do some sh*t you never done before.’” “Where did you spawn a bottle of Hennessy from?” 😭

Slime🐍

1,206,395 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

BANNON (Nov 2020): “Second term kicks off with firing Wray, firing Fauci. Now, I actually wanna go a step farther. I’d actually like to go back to the old times of Tudor England. I’d put the heads on pikes. I’d put them on the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats. Either get the program or you’re gone.”
0:54

BANNON (Nov 2020): “Second term kicks off with firing Wray, firing Fauci. Now, I actually wanna go a step farther. I’d actually like to go back to the old times of Tudor England. I’d put the heads on pikes. I’d put them on the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats. Either get the program or you’re gone.”

Grace Chong, MBI

12,660 görüntüleme • 13 saat önce

Nic: "I didn't tell anyone." 😂 Luke: "You told me the first day we met." 😌 Why is he so😭😭😭
0:29

Nic: "I didn't tell anyone." 😂 Luke: "You told me the first day we met." 😌 Why is he so😭😭😭

luna

51,856 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

💥Peak 80s action at its finest! 🔥 Nothing beats the legendary combat scenes in Rambo: First Blood Part II.
4:56

💥Peak 80s action at its finest! 🔥 Nothing beats the legendary combat scenes in Rambo: First Blood Part II.

🎬Bailey🇺🇸💙

112,128 görüntüleme • 10 saat önce

Clinical 🔥 Taylor Fritz reaches his third #MubadalaDCOpen quarter-final with a 6-3 6-4 victory over Majchrzak.
0:43

Clinical 🔥 Taylor Fritz reaches his third #MubadalaDCOpen quarter-final with a 6-3 6-4 victory over Majchrzak.

Tennis TV

16,057 görüntüleme • 8 saat önce

"I think he won the point three times!" 🤯 Rafael Jodar refused to lose this point #MubadalaDCOpen
1:00

"I think he won the point three times!" 🤯 Rafael Jodar refused to lose this point #MubadalaDCOpen

Tennis TV

196,470 görüntüleme • 4 saat önce

You pop into the donut place and you see this from the woman and 2 boys ahead of you. Do you say something or do you mind your business? Now let me ask: Should people START confronting this kind of lack of parenting more often? 🤔
0:45

You pop into the donut place and you see this from the woman and 2 boys ahead of you. Do you say something or do you mind your business? Now let me ask: Should people START confronting this kind of lack of parenting more often? 🤔

Croxxed Out

3,199,021 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

Hey? Grok verify this real or AI.
0:44

Hey? Grok verify this real or AI.

Gems Of Railway

112,197 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

Ronaldo was not a good dribbler🤫
1:26

Ronaldo was not a good dribbler🤫

37

1,335,489 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Musetti magic 💫 Lorenzo Musetti with the feathery touch at #MubadalaDCOpen
0:24

Musetti magic 💫 Lorenzo Musetti with the feathery touch at #MubadalaDCOpen

Tennis TV

16,707 görüntüleme • 11 saat önce

Bronny getting chants in Brooklyn 🔥
0:25

Bronny getting chants in Brooklyn 🔥

Legion Hoops

125,869 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

My colleague from South Dakota suggests here that the talking filibuster hasn’t been used in a century, and that it was not used to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He’s mistaken. As I’ve explained to the entire Senate GOP on multiple occasions, the talking filibuster *was* used effectively to break the weeks-long filibuster mounted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Leader Thune and others point out that the Senate ultimately invoked cloture on the Civil Rights Act, and on that basis wrongly conclude that the talking filibuster was *not* the tool used to achieve that victory. This argument ignores the fact that this is *how* the Senate closed a staggering 30-vote cloture deficit in 1964. After many weeks of fighting a losing battle, filibustering senators predictably started to lose their resolve to hold up the bill indefinitely, especially when they realized how hard they’d have to work to keep the effort alive. So they started proposing and supporting amendments to the bill to make it more palatable and help them save face. I still maintain that this is a viable approach that could work well—even better—in the context of the SAVE America Act, especially considering that the bill is less complicated and less controversial with voters than was the Civil Rights Act, and currently has a cloture deficit of only 10 votes—tiny compared to the 30-vote deficit faced by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. My colleague also mistakenly suggests that Senate Republicans would have to vote to enforce the talking filibuster. That simply isn’t true; no vote is required for this step. All we need is a majority leader willing to announce that we’re getting on the bill and that we will continue to debate it until it passes—all with the understanding that if filibustering senators fail to show up to debate it, we can “call the question” and pass it with a simple majority. That understanding, in turn, is what motivates the filibustering senators to show up and speak, but it’s also what naturally causes them to tire of the exercise after a few weeks, at which point they start looking for a face-saving off-ramp. Finally, Leader Thune suggests that the talking filibuster would be thwarted by being “reset” every time Democrats offered an amendment. There’s a valid point in there, but it’s not a good reason not to invoke the talking filibuster. It appears he’s referring indirectly to paragraph 1(a) of Senate Rule 19 (the two-speech rule). While offering a new amendment can create a new question under longstanding practice, the September 25, 1986 precedent narrowed how rigidly the two-speech rule is applied by clarifying that many procedural actions do not count as speeches at all. Particularly in light of that 1986 clarification, it’s been a long time since I’ve suggested we consider rigid enforcement of Rule 19’s two-speech limit as part of a talking filibuster strategy for the SAVE America Act. We don’t need it! Nor was that rule aggressively enforced during the Senate’s consideration of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Majority Leader Mike Mansfield correctly focused on requiring actual debate from filibustering senators rather than looking for technical ways to shut the debate down. To give credit where it’s due, I appreciate what Leader Thune said in this interview about the possibility of passing some iteration of SAVE America using budget reconciliation—a procedure in which there is no 60-vote cloture hurdle. I’ve been skeptical of this approach in the past, but I’m starting to believe the SAVE America Act has more budgetary features than I initially considered possible. That said, reconciliation is fraught with all kinds of problems, challenges, risks, and uncertainties. Also, failure can be far too easy to blame on the parliamentarian. I’m open to considering the reconciliation path, but we should make this decision with our eyes open. To do that, we need to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the talking filibuster.
0:55

My colleague from South Dakota suggests here that the talking filibuster hasn’t been used in a century, and that it was not used to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He’s mistaken. As I’ve explained to the entire Senate GOP on multiple occasions, the talking filibuster *was* used effectively to break the weeks-long filibuster mounted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Leader Thune and others point out that the Senate ultimately invoked cloture on the Civil Rights Act, and on that basis wrongly conclude that the talking filibuster was *not* the tool used to achieve that victory. This argument ignores the fact that this is *how* the Senate closed a staggering 30-vote cloture deficit in 1964. After many weeks of fighting a losing battle, filibustering senators predictably started to lose their resolve to hold up the bill indefinitely, especially when they realized how hard they’d have to work to keep the effort alive. So they started proposing and supporting amendments to the bill to make it more palatable and help them save face. I still maintain that this is a viable approach that could work well—even better—in the context of the SAVE America Act, especially considering that the bill is less complicated and less controversial with voters than was the Civil Rights Act, and currently has a cloture deficit of only 10 votes—tiny compared to the 30-vote deficit faced by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. My colleague also mistakenly suggests that Senate Republicans would have to vote to enforce the talking filibuster. That simply isn’t true; no vote is required for this step. All we need is a majority leader willing to announce that we’re getting on the bill and that we will continue to debate it until it passes—all with the understanding that if filibustering senators fail to show up to debate it, we can “call the question” and pass it with a simple majority. That understanding, in turn, is what motivates the filibustering senators to show up and speak, but it’s also what naturally causes them to tire of the exercise after a few weeks, at which point they start looking for a face-saving off-ramp. Finally, Leader Thune suggests that the talking filibuster would be thwarted by being “reset” every time Democrats offered an amendment. There’s a valid point in there, but it’s not a good reason not to invoke the talking filibuster. It appears he’s referring indirectly to paragraph 1(a) of Senate Rule 19 (the two-speech rule). While offering a new amendment can create a new question under longstanding practice, the September 25, 1986 precedent narrowed how rigidly the two-speech rule is applied by clarifying that many procedural actions do not count as speeches at all. Particularly in light of that 1986 clarification, it’s been a long time since I’ve suggested we consider rigid enforcement of Rule 19’s two-speech limit as part of a talking filibuster strategy for the SAVE America Act. We don’t need it! Nor was that rule aggressively enforced during the Senate’s consideration of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Majority Leader Mike Mansfield correctly focused on requiring actual debate from filibustering senators rather than looking for technical ways to shut the debate down. To give credit where it’s due, I appreciate what Leader Thune said in this interview about the possibility of passing some iteration of SAVE America using budget reconciliation—a procedure in which there is no 60-vote cloture hurdle. I’ve been skeptical of this approach in the past, but I’m starting to believe the SAVE America Act has more budgetary features than I initially considered possible. That said, reconciliation is fraught with all kinds of problems, challenges, risks, and uncertainties. Also, failure can be far too easy to blame on the parliamentarian. I’m open to considering the reconciliation path, but we should make this decision with our eyes open. To do that, we need to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the talking filibuster.

Mike Lee

418,200 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

First teaser for ‘THE LAST OF US’ Season 2. Releasing in 2025 on HBO.
0:21

First teaser for ‘THE LAST OF US’ Season 2. Releasing in 2025 on HBO.

DiscussingFilm

8,997,185 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump Announces Immediate Withdrawal from WHO 🚨 In a fiery statement today, President Donald J. Trump declared the United States would withdraw immediately from the World Health Organization (WHO), calling it a "corrupt Globalist SCAM" dominated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and global elites like Bill Gates. The WHO has become nothing more than a tool for the CCP and the Globalists to strip away medical autonomy, silence dissent, and control your lives. They want to crush your freedom of speech, dictate your health choices, and enslave you to their agenda. WE WILL NOT STAND FOR IT! - President Trump 🔥 Trump’s defiant stance against the WHO’s overreach marks a bold escalation in the fight against globalist agendas. He pledged to defund and abolish the organization, vowing to create an alternative alliance that prioritizes sovereignty, freedom, and truth over corruption and coercion. We will no longer allow the CCP or their billionaire puppets to dictate the future of our great nation. This is a fight for freedom, and America will LEAD THE CHARGE! 👊 The fightback has begun. With this move, Trump draws a line in the sand: It’s Globalists vs. Patriots, and the battle for the soul of America AND THE WORLD is here.
3:09

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump Announces Immediate Withdrawal from WHO 🚨 In a fiery statement today, President Donald J. Trump declared the United States would withdraw immediately from the World Health Organization (WHO), calling it a "corrupt Globalist SCAM" dominated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and global elites like Bill Gates. The WHO has become nothing more than a tool for the CCP and the Globalists to strip away medical autonomy, silence dissent, and control your lives. They want to crush your freedom of speech, dictate your health choices, and enslave you to their agenda. WE WILL NOT STAND FOR IT! - President Trump 🔥 Trump’s defiant stance against the WHO’s overreach marks a bold escalation in the fight against globalist agendas. He pledged to defund and abolish the organization, vowing to create an alternative alliance that prioritizes sovereignty, freedom, and truth over corruption and coercion. We will no longer allow the CCP or their billionaire puppets to dictate the future of our great nation. This is a fight for freedom, and America will LEAD THE CHARGE! 👊 The fightback has begun. With this move, Trump draws a line in the sand: It’s Globalists vs. Patriots, and the battle for the soul of America AND THE WORLD is here.

Jim Ferguson

2,247,306 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

If you forgot your iPhone password here is How to unlock a locked iPhone. Share this and save for future
2:25

If you forgot your iPhone password here is How to unlock a locked iPhone. Share this and save for future

AYO💡💡

20,728 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

🚨 WATCH: Andy Burnham says carers should be the "best paid people in society, not the worst" "Many people from other countries have been caring for my dad. I want those carers to know that we appreciate you"
0:52

🚨 WATCH: Andy Burnham says carers should be the "best paid people in society, not the worst" "Many people from other countries have been caring for my dad. I want those carers to know that we appreciate you"

Politics UK

2,238,578 görüntüleme • 20 saat önce

Asian Girl Burps Compilation #Burping、#ゲップ、#트림、#打嗝
7:25

Asian Girl Burps Compilation #Burping、#ゲップ、#트림、#打嗝

ChadesBan

820,774 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

तो अब ये है BJP की Strategy. Students vs Police.
2:19

तो अब ये है BJP की Strategy. Students vs Police.

Dinesh Chauhan

158,780 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce