Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

#Bunia, DRC: Anti-Tutsi Hate Speech Targeting Somali Drivers as Armed Congolese Soldier Issues Chilling Death Threats. This is further evidence that hate speech in the #DRC has reached alarming levels, and that Tutsis and those who resemble them are not safe under President Tshisekedi’s leadership.

110,421 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

📍#DRC🇨🇩 In 2023, after being received repeatedly by EU and U.S. embassies, Congolese Tutsi refugee Nsengiyera John said: "28 years in refugee camps is too much… If you choose to remain silent now, then stay silent when we decide to solve this problem ourselves." His message, delivered in Kinyarwanda, reflected deep frustration with the international community’s silence regarding the persecution of Congolese Tutsis. In the videos below, Nsengiyera John describes the suffering endured by Congolese Tutsi refugees living in camps for nearly three decades. Today, in 2025, the young Nsengiyera John is reportedly on the front lines with #M23, saying he is defending his rights after feeling abandoned by the international community — just as many felt in 1994 during the genocide against the Tutsis in Rwanda. In the DRC, Congolese Tutsis have been lynched, burned, and subjected to horrific violence by individuals claiming to defend the country's territorial integrity against so-called “Tutsi invaders.” At the same time, the Congolese government has mobilized, reorganized, and armed armed groups hostile to Tutsis, who continue to carry out systematic attacks against Congolese Tutsi communities in both rural and urban areas. Meanwhile, those responsible for these atrocities and anti-Tutsi militias are often described as “patriotic resistance fighters” defending their land and communities — according to statements from the President of the DRC, the Supreme Commander of the FARDC.

Kivu Info/24

10,577 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Point of No Return: DRC Army Calls for the Mass Killing of the Tutsi in DRC On Dec 29, speaking on behalf of the Congolese army, General Sylvain Ekenge delivered an official communication on the public TV channel RTNC.CD, in which he designated the Tutsi as the ultimate enemy to eliminate, including women and children. ➡️The FARDC Officiel SCIFA spokesperson indeed: 1) defines the Tutsi as the "Nilotic" foreigner/invader (from Abyssinia) who have come to "colonize" the Great Lakes, following the Hamitic conspiracy theory which led to the near-extermination of Tutsi in Rwanda from 1959 to 1994 (Video 1), 2) links the term Ubwenge (which means intelligence), to the notions of maliciousness, dishonesty, manipulation, deceitfulness, immorality, infidelity, perfidy, betrayal... which he attributes to the Tutsi as a definite, immutable moral characteristic (Video 1), 3) defines the Tutsi children as equally evil and morally corrupt (Video 1, 2), 4) establishes a symbolic link between the Washington agreement signed between DRC and Rwanda, and a "civil marriage" between a non-Tutsi Congolese man and a Tutsi woman (he describes as the primary tool of manipulation, betrayal, and deceit), thus comparing the Washington agreement to a "contract of betrayal" similar the infidelity of a Tutsi woman (Video 1, 2), ➡️ FARDC spokesperson then CALLS FOR ACTION against the designated Tutsi enemy. He says: "we need to keep our eyes open and to give the signal to begin..." ("nous devons ouvrir l'oeil et le ban"). By "we", he refers to FARDC and its coalition forces (#FDLR, Wazalendo, Mai-Mai, FDNB) and all non-Tutsi Congolese. His use of the expression "ouvrir le ban" constitutes, from a military terminology standpoint, and in the context of the DRC war, an open incitement to eliminate all Tutsi in the country. ➡️This analysis follows the notion of "DANGEROUS SPEECH" defined by speech expert Susan Benesch who has demonstrated that all the genocides have been preceded and accompanied by "dangerous speech" (which is harmful and calls for violent action against the targeted group), as opposed to hate speech (which is hurtful but not harmful). ➡️Benesch indicates that the most dangerous speech is the one pronounced by "a person of authority" who "has access to troops" in a context where the audience has been exposed, through repetition and over a period of time, to the same dehumanizing, discriminatory, harmful rhetoric against the targeted group. ➡️The FARDC spokesperson in his position of authority, under the highest command of the president of DRC Felix Tshisekedi, and owing to his "access to troops", constitutes a green light, and by extension a direct call, to all FARDC personnel and their coalition forces, as well as simple non-Tutsi Congolese civilians, TO ELIMINATE ALL the Congolese Tutsi, including infants.

Conspiracy Tracker Great Lakes

14,679 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten