Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Bunting for a hit is extremely valuable. It’s a weapon. I’ve always believed that players who can consistently bunt for hits can raise their batting average by 50–100 points over the course of a season, get on base more, and score more runs. Here, I share the purpose and... show more

Dirt Bro Diamond Training

18,162 subscribers

94,865 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Sports

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Bunting for a hit is very valuable. s a weapon and I have always said good bunt for hit bunters can add 50 to 100 points to their season average, get on base more and score more runs. Here I share techniques and purpose of a push bunt.

Bunting for a hit is very valuable. s a weapon and I have always said good bunt for hit bunters can add 50 to 100 points to their season average, get on base more and score more runs. Here I share techniques and purpose of a push bunt.

Trent Mongero

98,168 views • 3 years ago

Drag bunt! Just imagine any player doing this against any type of modified shift. It’s there all day long! In my opinion, every hitter from HS and above should have this in their “tool box.” Never know when it might be the solution to a particular game situation. I have always said HS hitters can boost their batting average over .100 points if they know how to drag and push bunt. I would say the same is true for college players…At least .50 points. Not being able to bunt is about as bad as a LH pitcher with a bad pick-off move to 1B. No excuse for it. JS

Drag bunt! Just imagine any player doing this against any type of modified shift. It’s there all day long! In my opinion, every hitter from HS and above should have this in their “tool box.” Never know when it might be the solution to a particular game situation. I have always said HS hitters can boost their batting average over .100 points if they know how to drag and push bunt. I would say the same is true for college players…At least .50 points. Not being able to bunt is about as bad as a LH pitcher with a bad pick-off move to 1B. No excuse for it. JS

Trent Mongero

520,817 views • 2 years ago

🗣️ Martin Odegaard on wanting more from himself this season: “After last season, to miss so many games because of injuries is really frustrating. “What I’ve done is use that as motivation for this year, to come back stronger and use all those experiences in a positive way. “Hopefully I can do that.” 🗣️ on his goal and adding more numbers “Yeah, for sure. It was good to get a goal. “Obviously I want to help the team score more goals, get more assists and all that. “So yeah, it’s a good way to start the season and I’m really happy to help the team.”

🗣️ Martin Odegaard on wanting more from himself this season: “After last season, to miss so many games because of injuries is really frustrating. “What I’ve done is use that as motivation for this year, to come back stronger and use all those experiences in a positive way. “Hopefully I can do that.” 🗣️ on his goal and adding more numbers “Yeah, for sure. It was good to get a goal. “Obviously I want to help the team score more goals, get more assists and all that. “So yeah, it’s a good way to start the season and I’m really happy to help the team.”

Connor Humm

20,774 views • 1 month ago

1ST & 3RD ONE OUT BUNT IMO this was intended to be a bunt for a hit to 3B to score the runner from 3B. Because of its direction, it turned into more of a safety squeeze. Most safety squeezes with runners on 1B & 3B are directed to 1B. Option ‘B’ would be to make the 3B field the

1ST & 3RD ONE OUT BUNT IMO this was intended to be a bunt for a hit to 3B to score the runner from 3B. Because of its direction, it turned into more of a safety squeeze. Most safety squeezes with runners on 1B & 3B are directed to 1B. Option ‘B’ would be to make the 3B field the

Jerry Weinstein

20,291 views • 2 years ago

Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.” “We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.” Marc continues: “A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.” He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: “Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?” Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: “The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.” Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook: “What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.” Video source: a16z (2026)

Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.” “We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.” Marc continues: “A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.” He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: “Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?” Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: “The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.” Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook: “What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.” Video source: a16z (2026)

Startup Archive

423,269 views • 9 months ago

"There are two types of coaches, those who do nothing and those who do a lot of damage. I prefer to be one of those who do nothing. The game belongs to the players, always ⚽. You can introduce them to a certain strategy that we have to implement, and they have to be convinced that they can do it. Then, there is the quality of the player, there is the attitude, the commitment. What a coach can do is make the players understand what teamwork is 🤝. Because we have the quality, Bayern Munich has it, Paris Saint Germain has it. Where is the difference? Where do you want to put this quality? If you want to put it in for yourself, it's not right ❌. If you put it in for the team, you can win 🏆."

"There are two types of coaches, those who do nothing and those who do a lot of damage. I prefer to be one of those who do nothing. The game belongs to the players, always ⚽. You can introduce them to a certain strategy that we have to implement, and they have to be convinced that they can do it. Then, there is the quality of the player, there is the attitude, the commitment. What a coach can do is make the players understand what teamwork is 🤝. Because we have the quality, Bayern Munich has it, Paris Saint Germain has it. Where is the difference? Where do you want to put this quality? If you want to put it in for yourself, it's not right ❌. If you put it in for the team, you can win 🏆."

Keepitonthedeck

22,374 views • 1 year ago

🚨⛳️🏆 Jordan Spieth on trying to complete the career grand slam: "If I can win one more tournament in my life, it would obviously be this one for that reason. But the easiest way to do that is to not try to, in a weird way, you know." Will Spieth do it?

🚨⛳️🏆 Jordan Spieth on trying to complete the career grand slam: "If I can win one more tournament in my life, it would obviously be this one for that reason. But the easiest way to do that is to not try to, in a weird way, you know." Will Spieth do it?

NUCLR GOLF

464,532 views • 5 months ago

Slappers 🤩 I chose to make the entire reel of Aliyah Andrews to show you exactly how much of a threat one slapper can be. If you can do it all (bunt, soft, chopper, power) the defense will have no idea how to play you.

Slappers 🤩 I chose to make the entire reel of Aliyah Andrews to show you exactly how much of a threat one slapper can be. If you can do it all (bunt, soft, chopper, power) the defense will have no idea how to play you.

Megan Rembielak

97,053 views • 3 years ago

SCORE MORE POINTS? I feel like during the recruiting process players and parents feel this immense pressure to score points bc they know that the more points they score the better chance they have to be seen. Scoring will increase your chance of being seen/talked about. That is a fact. But how you go about it will ultimately decide your future. Sadly, too many players and parents are pushing the scoring aspect and it makes the player play selfish basketball. If you out scoring ahead of winning and doing the things necessary to win (guarding, passing, rebounding, etc.), it doesn’t matter how many points you score. Selfish players eventually end up on selfish teams or sitting the bench on good teams. Lock in, play the right way, play hard, score the crap out of it, and you’ll be good.

SCORE MORE POINTS? I feel like during the recruiting process players and parents feel this immense pressure to score points bc they know that the more points they score the better chance they have to be seen. Scoring will increase your chance of being seen/talked about. That is a fact. But how you go about it will ultimately decide your future. Sadly, too many players and parents are pushing the scoring aspect and it makes the player play selfish basketball. If you out scoring ahead of winning and doing the things necessary to win (guarding, passing, rebounding, etc.), it doesn’t matter how many points you score. Selfish players eventually end up on selfish teams or sitting the bench on good teams. Lock in, play the right way, play hard, score the crap out of it, and you’ll be good.

Steve Dagostino

16,942 views • 1 year ago

“It’s ok if you’re just average right now. I just want to know whether you want to become great. Because there are a lot of people who are ok accepting average. They think it’s safer and more comfortable. They think trying to be great comes with a lot of risk. They think it’s too hard and they might get exposed. People think it’s easier to be average than to go try to be great. There’s more friends, more acceptance, more comfort among the average. But I’ll tell you the real truth: Being average is only safe and comfortable for a small window of time. Because at the end of the regular season, when that final whistle blows, and you’re not playing for a championship? How comfortable is that?”

“It’s ok if you’re just average right now. I just want to know whether you want to become great. Because there are a lot of people who are ok accepting average. They think it’s safer and more comfortable. They think trying to be great comes with a lot of risk. They think it’s too hard and they might get exposed. People think it’s easier to be average than to go try to be great. There’s more friends, more acceptance, more comfort among the average. But I’ll tell you the real truth: Being average is only safe and comfortable for a small window of time. Because at the end of the regular season, when that final whistle blows, and you’re not playing for a championship? How comfortable is that?”

Brian Kight

212,837 views • 3 years ago

Winning baseball. Check the box ✅ A guy with 23 home runs and 73 RBI lays down a safety squeeze in the College World Series to score a huge run. That’s winning baseball. How many tools are in your toolbox? How many different ways can you impact the game and hurt the opponent? Or are you one-dimensional? Or worse… selfish? “I don’t bunt, I hit bombs.” Championship teams and championship players can do it all. Team-first mentality. Beautiful. Refreshing.

Winning baseball. Check the box ✅ A guy with 23 home runs and 73 RBI lays down a safety squeeze in the College World Series to score a huge run. That’s winning baseball. How many tools are in your toolbox? How many different ways can you impact the game and hurt the opponent? Or are you one-dimensional? Or worse… selfish? “I don’t bunt, I hit bombs.” Championship teams and championship players can do it all. Team-first mentality. Beautiful. Refreshing.

Dirt Bro Diamond Training

25,183 views • 5 months ago

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on how difficult it was leaving out Gabriel Jesus, Ethan Nwaneri and Gabriel Martinelli: “No, just technical decisions. “I’ve been trying to persuade the Premier League and the clubs to be able to extend the number of players that we can have, especially the outfield players in the squads, because we play more and more games and the load is unreal. “Not giving those players the chance to be here and participate, because maybe the game demands the qualities of one of those players and you don’t have them available, it’s just a shame. “It’s the most difficult part of the job, but there’s nothing else to it. “It’s just a fact that we can bring 18 outfield players, and we believed that for today’s game these were the options that we needed, especially with the physical condition of certain players.”

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on how difficult it was leaving out Gabriel Jesus, Ethan Nwaneri and Gabriel Martinelli: “No, just technical decisions. “I’ve been trying to persuade the Premier League and the clubs to be able to extend the number of players that we can have, especially the outfield players in the squads, because we play more and more games and the load is unreal. “Not giving those players the chance to be here and participate, because maybe the game demands the qualities of one of those players and you don’t have them available, it’s just a shame. “It’s the most difficult part of the job, but there’s nothing else to it. “It’s just a fact that we can bring 18 outfield players, and we believed that for today’s game these were the options that we needed, especially with the physical condition of certain players.”

Connor Humm

80,765 views • 1 month ago

“A” is for Ally. I’ve always been one. I’ll always be one. And I know there’s always more to learn. Grateful for the work of Equality California and the Los Angeles LGBT Center and I look forward to what we can achieve together.

“A” is for Ally. I’ve always been one. I’ll always be one. And I know there’s always more to learn. Grateful for the work of Equality California and the Los Angeles LGBT Center and I look forward to what we can achieve together.

Eric Swalwell

19,504 views • 7 months ago

I’ve made a league for my mates to predict scores for the World Cup. It’s not betting or anything like that. It’s a free app that me and my mates are in. Here the link to join it :- It’s a laugh and if you predict correct scores you get points. The aim is to beat me. The more games you predict on; the more points you get. And I’ll sort out a little prize for the winner. So come play and join me and my mates. Bosh❤️

I’ve made a league for my mates to predict scores for the World Cup. It’s not betting or anything like that. It’s a free app that me and my mates are in. Here the link to join it :- It’s a laugh and if you predict correct scores you get points. The aim is to beat me. The more games you predict on; the more points you get. And I’ll sort out a little prize for the winner. So come play and join me and my mates. Bosh❤️

Thomas Skinner ⚒

63,136 views • 3 months ago

I want to put a worthy project before you and explain why I’m backing it, and why I may eventually have some personal involvement in it. “Deceived: The Ruin of the Modern Woman: A Christian Exploration and Confrontation of Feminism.” Here’s the Kickstarter: There is a longer trailer on the Kickstarter, but I've also attached the shorter conceptual trailer. First, the project itself: it’s a documentary by a Christian director examining the history and consequences of feminism and offering a biblical alternative. Second, here’s why I’m backing it. I’ve known Les Lanphere, the director, for a while, and I know him to be both a talented filmmaker and a principled Christian man. I trust him to tackle this subject biblically and with intensity, but without unnecessary harshness or shock-jockery. I also believe this is one of the defining issues of our day, and it’s one I’ve worked hard to address for most of my adult life. Feminism has obviously affected men and society as a whole, but now that I’m the father of three daughters and have a daughter-in-law, I’ve become even more concerned about what it has robbed women of: the beauty of their unique, God-given design and purpose in His world. So, for me, this is a trustworthy creator tackling a crucial subject in which I’m personally invested. I’m not yet sure to what extent I’ll eventually be involved in the documentary itself, but I backed the project for $300 today, and I’ll probably increase that once I’ve had a little more time to consider it. In the meantime, I want to challenge 50 of you to back the project for at least $5 each. That may not sound like much, but it helps. And the more people who get behind the project and follow its progress, the more attention it can gain. Even if you can only give a few dollars, you can play a real part by backing it, following it, and helping get the word out.

I want to put a worthy project before you and explain why I’m backing it, and why I may eventually have some personal involvement in it. “Deceived: The Ruin of the Modern Woman: A Christian Exploration and Confrontation of Feminism.” Here’s the Kickstarter: There is a longer trailer on the Kickstarter, but I've also attached the shorter conceptual trailer. First, the project itself: it’s a documentary by a Christian director examining the history and consequences of feminism and offering a biblical alternative. Second, here’s why I’m backing it. I’ve known Les Lanphere, the director, for a while, and I know him to be both a talented filmmaker and a principled Christian man. I trust him to tackle this subject biblically and with intensity, but without unnecessary harshness or shock-jockery. I also believe this is one of the defining issues of our day, and it’s one I’ve worked hard to address for most of my adult life. Feminism has obviously affected men and society as a whole, but now that I’m the father of three daughters and have a daughter-in-law, I’ve become even more concerned about what it has robbed women of: the beauty of their unique, God-given design and purpose in His world. So, for me, this is a trustworthy creator tackling a crucial subject in which I’m personally invested. I’m not yet sure to what extent I’ll eventually be involved in the documentary itself, but I backed the project for $300 today, and I’ll probably increase that once I’ve had a little more time to consider it. In the meantime, I want to challenge 50 of you to back the project for at least $5 each. That may not sound like much, but it helps. And the more people who get behind the project and follow its progress, the more attention it can gain. Even if you can only give a few dollars, you can play a real part by backing it, following it, and helping get the word out.

Michael Foster

157,629 views • 1 month ago

those of you that always drag artistes on the tl,the Next Afrobeats Star is here again,come and show us what you can do .😂🫵🏿 I avidly followed last season,it was a hit and this season promises to be more fun and rewarding !! #NextAfrobeatsStar #MTNxNASSeason2

those of you that always drag artistes on the tl,the Next Afrobeats Star is here again,come and show us what you can do .😂🫵🏿 I avidly followed last season,it was a hit and this season promises to be more fun and rewarding !! #NextAfrobeatsStar #MTNxNASSeason2

𝓳𝓸𝓼𝓱🧸

11,286 views • 2 months ago

Vinod Khosla on the right way to execute a business plan Vinod Khosla, who founded Sun Microsystems and Khosla Ventures, likes to say: “Be obstinate about your vision, but be really flexible about your tactics.” He explains what he means by this: “It’s important to have a vision of where you’re trying to go, but how you get there is a series of experiments… What entrepreneurs do is effectual reasoning. They have a big vision, but they don’t try and get there in one leap… You take a step in the right direction so you can garner more resources and then try the next experiment… You try and garner resources for the next step, every step — not do the whole thing in one step.” This, Vinod believes, is one of the reasons raising too much money can lead founders astray: “People who raise too much money get too much confidence in their own plan, which is normally BS. The right way to do a business plan is flex-planning: have a vision, but plan the next 3-6 months to test every assumption you have. A business plan is about testing every assumption. Even if you’re sure it’s true, test it if you can in the marketplace by running an experiment.” He gives another analogy for the point he’s trying to make: “You want to shoot for Mount Everest, but nobody ever got to Mount Everest without getting to base camp first. You build a base camp of a stable place where you’ve learned a lot and where you can tread water for a while… Maybe you get to cash flow breakeven at base camp. But you want to set up base camp where it helps you scope out the path to Mount Everest.” Video source: Startup Grind (2015)

Vinod Khosla on the right way to execute a business plan Vinod Khosla, who founded Sun Microsystems and Khosla Ventures, likes to say: “Be obstinate about your vision, but be really flexible about your tactics.” He explains what he means by this: “It’s important to have a vision of where you’re trying to go, but how you get there is a series of experiments… What entrepreneurs do is effectual reasoning. They have a big vision, but they don’t try and get there in one leap… You take a step in the right direction so you can garner more resources and then try the next experiment… You try and garner resources for the next step, every step — not do the whole thing in one step.” This, Vinod believes, is one of the reasons raising too much money can lead founders astray: “People who raise too much money get too much confidence in their own plan, which is normally BS. The right way to do a business plan is flex-planning: have a vision, but plan the next 3-6 months to test every assumption you have. A business plan is about testing every assumption. Even if you’re sure it’s true, test it if you can in the marketplace by running an experiment.” He gives another analogy for the point he’s trying to make: “You want to shoot for Mount Everest, but nobody ever got to Mount Everest without getting to base camp first. You build a base camp of a stable place where you’ve learned a lot and where you can tread water for a while… Maybe you get to cash flow breakeven at base camp. But you want to set up base camp where it helps you scope out the path to Mount Everest.” Video source: Startup Grind (2015)

Startup Archive

13,930 views • 9 months ago

QUICK TIP: If you get hit by incendiary bullets and have the fire stuck on your screen you can clear it by inspecting your weapon or running through a smoke. If you do it by inspecting weapon and then get in and out of a car, the fire will come back and you have to do it again. If you do it with a smoke the fire is gone permanently.

QUICK TIP: If you get hit by incendiary bullets and have the fire stuck on your screen you can clear it by inspecting your weapon or running through a smoke. If you do it by inspecting weapon and then get in and out of a car, the fire will come back and you have to do it again. If you do it with a smoke the fire is gone permanently.

AG Fifakill

60,538 views • 1 month ago